Sunday, October 13, 2019

CLIMATE CHANGE LIARS.. 50 YEARS OF HOAXES. ARE SCIENTISTS REALLY STUPID OR JUST PAID LACKEYS?

Wrong Again& Again & Again: 

50 Years of Failed "Eco-pocalyptic" Predictions

 

 

ARE THE DOOMSDAY SCIENTISTS STUPID OR ARE THEY PAID LACKEYS FOR A CORRUPT GANG OF SCAMMERS TRYING TO STOP CAPITALISM SO THAT COMMUNISM CAN TAKE ROOT ?

ALWAYS ASK WHY THE FERVOR AND PASSION FOR A BOGUS PREDICTION

THE PRIZE IS 
$10,000,000,000,000

Ten trillion dollars. That’s the conservative estimate of the amount of money Barack Obama, Albert Gore Jr., and a whole cast of criminals stand to make yearly (gross) off of the greatest scam in human history: "global warming." "Climate Change"  or whatever the shit you want to call it today. Its all about the money! 



Before we look at the 50 years of scams.. lets revisit why The Green New Deal is louder than ever!

If you have ever sat back, scratching your head and wondering why the Marxists are pushing for a "cap and trade" bill that would not only make energy costs "necessarily skyrocket," to quote Barack Obama, but do absolutely nothing to effect fictional "climate change, " one way or the other, you are about to find out.

We have long known this Marxist idea was nothing more than a continuation of the communist desire to "spread the wealth" by forcibly stealing from those who create and earn, and giving to those that don’t. This is an inbred mental defect that can’t be cured, only contained, the most effective way being: not to elect these evil, corrupt bastards in the first place!
WATCH THIS
 




When we first learned of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) we smelled a rat. No one has been more radical than Barack Obama when it comes to pushing the "global warming" hoax, and the "cap and trade" scheme. Being based in Chicago, common sense told us that Obama was somehow involved, and it was as corrupt as the day is long.
It took Glenn Beck to put it all together, and he has done a remarkable job of spelling it all out. In the videos below, Glenn documents Obama’s ties to the multi-trillion dollar carbon trading scam, Goldman Sachs, the Joyce Foundation, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers' brother, Al Gore, George Soros, Maurice Strong and a whole cast of nerdowells.

Beck does a great job of connecting the dots here, as well as spelling out the scam itself. It’s quite interesting to note that all of the Marxist-democrats were pounding Goldman Sachs in their "show trial" for their handling of derivatives, a "synthetic" financial product, created out of thin air. Never mind it was the Marxist-democrat Party controlled Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac who were involved in the creation of this product, and President Bill Clinton who sanctioned it.

Even Obama’s boss, George Soros, got in on the act writing an essay on his website speaking to the dangers of derivatives.



And yet, this is what carbon trading is, in a way. You are not buying a real product, or producing a benefit. Trading carbon credits can best be described as a "sin tax" with the "sinner" being able to purchase the ability to continuing "sinning," without stopping the "sinful behavior" in any way whatsoever. You are simply redistributing wealth. In this case, those who actually produce will be forced to purchase the right to continue to produce from those who don’t produce. A real triumph for the glorious communist revolution!




But stealing money from the producers, and giving it to the non-producers is only half the story. These carbon credits will have to be tracked and traded. These credits will be treated as any other commodity, and traded on the open market. This is where the Chicago Climate Exchange comes in. They will be the only exchange for trading these credits and will make hefty commissions buying and selling these credits. (They get paid coming and going)

Energy prices will "necessarily skyrocket" because of two factors. One, because producers will have to purchase these credits, adding to the cost of doing business, a cost that will be passed on to the consumer, and two, these producers will be forced to buy the privilege of continuing to produce, from the Chicago Climate Exchange, which will raise the cost of doing business even more, again this will be passed on to the consumer.

This is where Obama, and the rest of what Beck is calling Crime, Incorporated come in. Conservative estimates are Obama, Gore and the other scam artists involved in this deal will gross ten trillion dollars yearly, selling nothing but thin air.

They are lengthy, about 10 minutes each, but watch Glenn as he systematically spells out the entire scam. Pay particular attention to the "shadowy figure" he introduces partway into all of this.

As you see it’s pretty easy to understand why, despite mounting evidence that every single "scientific calculation" declaring the existence of "global warming" is fraudulent, much of it deliberately skewed to show a result that doesn’t exist, Obama, Gore, and a whole host of corrupt-o-crats are pushing harder than ever for a "fix" to a non-existent problem.

Ten trillion dollars is a whole lot of money to be made for essentially doing nothing.

Obama’s involvement in Chicago Climate Exchange—the rest of the story
Good news to know that the truth will always out—even when you’re Barack Obama.




"Obama Years Ago Helped Fund Carbon Program He Is Now Pushing Through Congress" is a FOXNews story by Ed Barnes. In short, "While on the board of a Chicago-based charity, Barack Obama helped fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the cap-and-trade carbon reduction program he is now trying to push through Congress as president."
The charity was the Joyce Foundation on whose board of directors Obama served and which gave nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were "instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself "North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide."
And that’s only the beginning of this tawdry tale, Mr. Barnes.
The "privately-owned" Chicago Climate Exchange is heavily influenced by Obama cohorts Al Gore and Maurice Strong.
For years now Strong and Gore have been cashing in on that lucrative cottage industry known as man-made global warming.
Strong is on the board of directors of the Chicago Climate Exchange, Wikipedia-described as "the world’s first and North America’s only legally binding greenhouse gas emission registry reduction system for emission sources and offset projects in North America and Brazil."




Gore, self-proclaimed Patron Saint of the Environment, buys his carbon off-sets from himself—the Generation Investment Management LLP, an independent, private, owner-managed partnership established in 2004 with offices in London and Washington, D.C., of which he is both chairman and founding partner. The Generation Investment Management business has considerable influence over the major carbon credit trading firms that currently exist, including the Chicago Climate Exchange.




Strong, the silent partner, is a man whose name often draws a blank on the Washington cocktail circuit. Even though a former Secretary General of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (the much hyped Rio Earth Summit) and Under-Secretary General of the United Nations in the days of an Oil-for-Food beleaguered Kofi Annan, the Canadian born Strong is little known in the United States. That’s because he spends most of his time in China where he he has been working to make the communist country the world’s next superpower. The nondescript Strong, nonetheless is the big cheese in the underworld of climate change and is one of the main architects of the failing Kyoto Protocol.
Full credit for the expose on the business partnership of Strong and Gore in the cap-and-trade reduction scheme should go to the investigative acumen of the Executive Intelligence Review (EIR).
The tawdry tale of the top two global warming gurus in the business world goes all the way back to Earth Day, April 17, 1995 when the future author of "An Inconvenient Truth" travelled to Fall River, Massachusetts, to deliver a green sermon at the headquarters of Molten Metal Technology Inc. (MMTI). MMTI was a firm that proclaimed to have invented a process for recycling metals from waste. Gore praised the Molten Metal firm as a pioneer in the kind of innovative technology that can save the environment, and make money for investors at the same time.
"Gore left a few facts out of his speech that day," wrote EIR. "First, the firm was run by Strong and a group of Gore intimates, including Peter Knight, the firm’s registered lobbyist, and Gore’s former top Senate aide."
(Fast-forward to the present day and ask yourself why it is that every time someone picks up another Senate rock, another serpent comes slithering out).
Second, the company had received more than $25 million in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research and development grants, but had failed to prove that the technology worked on a commercial scale. The company would go on to receive another $8 million in federal taxpayers’ cash, at that point, its only source of revenue.
With Al Gore’s Earth Day as a Wall Street calling card, Molten Metal’s stock value soared to $35 a share, a range it maintained through October 1996. But along the way, DOE scientists had balked at further funding. When in March 1996, corporate officers concluded that the federal cash cow was about to run dry, they took action: Between that date and October 1996, seven corporate officers—including Maurice strong—sold off $15.3 million in personal shares in the company, at top market value. On Oct. 20, 1996—a Sunday—the company issued a press release, announcing for the first time, that DOE funding would be vastly scaled back, and reported the bad news on a conference call with stockbrokers.
On Monday, the stock plunged by 49%, soon landing at $5 a share. By early 1997, furious stockholders had filed a class action suit against the company and its directors. Ironically, one of the class action lawyers had tangled with Maurice strong in another insider trading case, involving a Swiss company called AZL Resources, chaired by Strong, who was also a lead shareholder. The AZL case closely mirrored Molten Metal, and in the end, Strong and the other AZL partners agreed to pay $5 million to dodge a jury verdict, when eyewitness evidence surfaced of Strong’s role in scamming the value of the company stock up into the stratosphere, before selling it off.
In 1997, Strong went on to accept from Tongsun Park, who was found guilty of illegally acting as an Iraqi agent, $1 million from Saddam Hussein, which was invested in Cordex Petroleum Inc., a company he owned with his son, Fred.
These are the leaders in the Man-made Global Warming Movement, who three years later were to be funded by the man who was to become President of the United States of America.
If we follow the time line on where Obama was during the funding of the Chicago Climate Exchange, he was still a professor at the University of Chicago Law School teaching constitutional law, with his law license becoming inactive a year later in 2002.
It may be interesting to note that the Chicago Climate Exchange in spite of its hype, is a veritable rat’s nest of cronyism. The largest shareholder in the Exchange is Goldman Sachs. Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley is its honorary chairman, The Joyce Foundation, which funded the Exchange also funded money for John Ayers’ Chicago School Initiatives. John is the brother of William Ayers.
What a flap when it was discovered that the senator from Chicago had nursed on Saul Alinsky’s milk, had his political career launched at a coffee party held by domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, and sat for 20 years, uncomplaining in front of the "God-dam-America" pulpit of resentment-challenged Jeremiah Wright.
Folk were naturally outraged that the empty suit who would go on to become TOTUS was spawned from such anti-American activism.
But the media should have been hollering, "Stop Thief!" instead.
The same Chicago Climate Exchange promoting public rip-off was funded by Obama before he was POTUS.
Even as man-made global warming is being exposed as a money-generating hoax, Obama is working feverishly to push the controversial cap-and-trade carbon reduction scheme through Congress.
Obama was never the character he created for himself in the fairy-tale version in "Dreams of My Father". He’s the agent of Change and Hope for cohorts making money down at the Chicago Climate Exchange.
The Barbarians are pushing at the gate of the Global Warming fraud, and to borrow a line from children playing Hide and Seek, Here they come, ready or not!




These are world class crooks we are dealing with here, and these plans have been in motion for quite some time. As you can easily see, hyping the "global warming" scam is nothing more than a scheme by a very few über corrupt Marxists who want to gain unbelievable wealth for themselves and their cronies, as well as the complete and total domination over all mankind.

This is nothing short of pure evil, and this group wishes to build a worldwide power base that absolutely no one will be able to escape the reach of. It’s a diabolical scheme that will not only destroy the United States, but every civilized nation on earth. It will wipe out the very concept of personal Liberty and Freedom world wide. The entire world will be little more than slaves to the whims of a few deranged sociopaths whose desire for wealth and power is without limit.

Investors Business Daily has also addressed this incredible mess:



The $10 Trillion Climate Fraud
Cap-And-Trade: While senators froth over Goldman Sachs and derivatives, a climate trading scheme being run out of the Chicago Climate Exchange would make Bernie Madoff blush. Its trail leads to the White House.
Lost in the recent headlines was Al Gore's appearance Monday in Denver at the annual meeting of the Council of Foundations, an association of the nation's philanthropic leaders.
"Time's running out (on climate change)," Gore told them. "We have to get our act together. You have a unique role in getting our act together."



Gore was right that foundations will play a key role in keeping the climate scam alive as evidence of outright climate fraud grows, just as they were critical in the beginning when the Joyce Foundation in 2000 and 2001 provided the seed money to start the Chicago Climate Exchange. It started trading in 2003, and what it trades is, essentially, air. More specifically perhaps, hot air.
The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) advertises itself as "North America's only cap-and-trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide." Barack Obama served on the board of the Joyce Foundation from 1994 to 2002 when the CCX startup grants were issued. As president, pushing cap-and-trade is one of his highest priorities. Now isn't that special?





Few Americans have heard of either entity. The Joyce Foundation was originally the financial nest egg of a widow whose family had made millions in the now out-of-favor lumber industry.
After her death, the foundation was run by philanthropists who increasingly dedicated their giving to liberal causes, including gun control, environmentalism and school changes.
Currently, CCX members agree to a voluntary but legally binding agreement to regulate greenhouse gases.
The CCX provides the mechanism in trading the very pollution permits and carbon offsets the administration's cap-and-trade proposals would impose by government mandate.
Thanks to Fox News' Glenn Beck, we have learned a lot about CCX, not the least of which is that its founder, Richard Sandor, says he knew Obama well back in the day when the Joyce Foundation awarded money to the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University, where Sandor was a research professor.
Sandor estimates that climate trading could be "a $10 trillion dollar market." It could very well be, if cap-and-trade measures like Waxman-Markey and Kerry-Boxer are signed into law, making energy prices skyrocket, and as companies buy and sell permits to emit those six "greenhouse" gases.
So lucrative does this market appear, it attracted the attention of London-based Generation Investment Management, which purchased a stake in CCX and is now the fifth-largest shareholder.
As we noted last year, Gore is co-founder of Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offsets of dubious value that let rich polluters continue to pollute with a clear conscience.
Other founders include former Goldman Sachs partner David Blood, as well as Mark Ferguson and Peter Harris, also of Goldman Sachs. In 2006, CCX received a big boost when another investor bought a 10% stake on the prospect of making a great deal of money for itself. That investor was Goldman Sachs, now under the gun for selling financial instruments it knew were doomed to fail.
The actual mechanism for trading on the exchange was purchased and patented by none other than Franklin Raines, who was CEO of Fannie Mae at the time.
Raines profited handsomely to the tune of some $90 million by buying and bundling bad mortgages that led to the collapse of the American economy. His interest in climate trading is curious until one realizes cap-and-trade would make housing costlier as well.
Amazingly, none of these facts came up at Senate hearings on Goldman Sachs' activities, which may be nothing more than Ross Perot's famous "gorilla dust," meant to distract us from the real issues.
The climate trading scheme being stitched together here will do more damage than Goldman Sachs, AIG and Fannie Mae combined. But it will bring power and money to its architects.

recap:

The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) is projecting a $10 trillion a year gross profit if the Obama regime’s cap and tax scheme passes. It will destroy the nation’s economy. When Trump became President  they LOST THIS LONG TERM PROSPECT TO RAPE AMERICA. YOU CAN SEE WHY THE DEMOCRATS WANT TRUMP OUT! HE STANDS IN THE WAY OF HUGE PAYOUTS FOR THE "DEMOSOACIALIST" OLIGARCHY CLASS OF CROOKS

Barrack Obama, while a board member of the Joyce Foundation, provided the funding for the formation of the CCX. Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s top adviser, still sits on the board. The money to form the CCX was funneled by Obama to the brother of a murdering domestic terrorist, who declared war on the United States and set off bombs in the Capitol, the Pentagon, as well as police stations, Army recruiting centers, and other government buildings nationwide.

London-based Generation Investment Management (GIM), realizing this was a license to print money, purchased a significant stake in CCX. (fifth largest shareholder) GIM was founded by none other than former Vice President, and chief "global warming" hoaxer, Albert Gore, Jr., along with a cabal of former and present Goldman Sachs people such as David Blood, a former Goldman executive, as well as Mark Ferguson, and Peter Harris, who are still part of Goldman Sachs, just to name a few. Read more here.

Franklin Raines, perhaps one of the most crooked men alive, the man who stole $90 million dollars, for himself, while head of Fannie Mae...by cooking the books, a deed that most certainly helped cause the housing collapse and economic hardships we are in now, used taxpayer money to buy the technology to measure and manage "carbon." The "big board." The patent for this nonsense was granted the day after Obama won the presidential election. More reading here.

GIM, the collaboration between Al Gore and the Goldman Sachs people owns 10 percent of CCX, and it’s potential $10 trillion yearly take, Goldman Sachs also owns 10 percent of CCX. This is an incredible weave of corruption, deceit, and greed. Remember when Obama said last week that at some point one has "made enough money" ? Obviously this vile concept doesn’t apply to Obama himself or his crooked friends.

There is only one way to stop this nightmare from reaching it’s full potential, and the destruction of civil society as we know it, and that is to make sure no legislation mandating cap and tax, or any other "climate change" tomfoolery ever comes to fruition.

With the enviro-moonbattery that is being ginned up over the tragedy in the Gulf, you can bet Obama and his co-conspirators will be working at breakneck speed to get the legislation in place that will make them wealthy beyond all description, and enslave mankind to their will for all eternity.

This must be stopped and stopped now. In a just society, men like Al Gore, George Soros, Barack Obama and the rest of this criminal enterprise, would be thrown in a dark prison to rot, never to see the light of day again.

I’m not sure we can make that happen, but we can expose these people and make sure none of their plans come to fruition. We can then start voting all of those who sympathize with this nonsense out of office until there are no more Marxists, progressives, or any other corrupt beings serving in any elected office, at any level. This is the only way we can save the nation, and the world.


Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today.
None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.
What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science.
More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science.
While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited.


1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975.’
1969: ‘Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989.’
1970: Ice age by 2000
1970: ‘America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.’
1971: ‘New Ice Age Coming’
1972: New ice age by 2070
1974: ‘New Ice Age Coming Fast’
Source: The Guardian, January 29, 1974
1974: ‘Another Ice Age?’
Source: TIME, June 24, 1974
1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’
But no such ‘great peril to life’ has been observed as the so-called ‘ozone hole’ remains:

Sources: Headline
NASA Data | Graph
1976: ‘The Cooling’
Source: New York Times Book Review, July 18, 1976
1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’
Noblesville Ledger (Noblesville, IN) April 9, 1980
But 10 years later, the US government program formed to study acid rain concluded:
Associated Press, September 6, 1990
1978: ‘No End in Sight’ to 30-Year Cooling Trend
Source: New York Times, January 5, 1978
But according to NASA satellite data there is a slight warming trend since 1979.
Source: DrRoySpencer.com
1988: James Hansen forecasts increase regional drought in 1990s
But the last really dry year in the Midwest was 1988, and recent years have been record wet.
Source: RealClimateScience.com
1988: Washington DC days over 90F to from 35 to 85
But the number of hot days in the DC area peaked in 1911, and have been declining ever since.
Source: RealClimateScience.com
1988: Maldives completely under water in 30 years
Source: Agence France Press, September 26, 1988
1989: Rising seas to ‘obliterate’ nations by 2000
Source: Associated Press, June 30, 1989
1989: New York City’s West Side Highway underwater by 2019
Source: Salon.com, October 23, 2001
1995 to Present: Climate Model Failure
Source: CEI.org
2000: ‘Children won’t know what snow is.’
Source: The Independent, March 20, 2000
2002: Famine in 10 years
Source: The Guardian, December 23, 2002
2004: Britain to have Siberian climate by 2020
Source: The Guardian, February 21, 2004
2008: Arctic will be ice-free by 2018
Source: Associated Press, June 24, 2008
2008: Al Gore warns of ice-free Arctic by 2013
But… it’s still there:
Source: WattsUpWithThat.com, December 16, 2018
2009: Prince Charles says only 8 years to save the planet
Source: The Independent, July 9, 2009
2009: UK prime minister says 50 days to ‘save the planet from catastrophe’
Source: The Independent: October 20, 2009
2009: Arctic ice-free by 2014
Source: USA Today, December 14, 2009
2013: Arctic ice-free by 2015
Source: The Guardian, July 24, 2013
The paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02550-9 (open access)
Gas hydrate dissociation off Svalbard induced by isostatic rebound rather than global warming
Abstract
Methane seepage from the upper continental slopes of Western Svalbard has previously been attributed to gas hydrate dissociation induced by anthropogenic warming of ambient bottom waters. Here we show that sediment cores drilled off Prins Karls Foreland contain freshwater from dissociating hydrates. However, our modeling indicates that the observed pore water freshening began around 8 ka BP when the rate of isostatic uplift outpaced eustatic sea-level rise. The resultant local shallowing and lowering of hydrostatic pressure forced gas hydrate dissociation and dissolved chloride depletions consistent with our geochemical analysis. Hence, we propose that hydrate dissociation was triggered by postglacial isostatic rebound rather than anthropogenic warming. Furthermore, we show that methane fluxes from dissociating hydrates were considerably smaller than present methane seepage rates implying that gas hydrates were not a major source of methane to the oceans, but rather acted as a dynamic seal, regulating methane release from deep geological reservoirs.

2013: Arctic ice-free by 2016
Source: The Guardian, December 9, 2013
2014: Only 500 days before ‘climate chaos’
But…
Sources: Washington Examiner

MORE HOAXES AND PREDICTIONS!
In 1974, there was unanimous consensus among scientists that earth had been cooling since the 1940s.


Fast forward forty-five years. A small group of people, many of whom who were not alive in 1974, have determined they know more about the weather in 1974 than the scientists who lived through it and studied it at the time.

Zeke Hausfather, who openly brags about being a left-wing activist, is one of those people. He believes that adding tens of thousands of very low quality fragmented records into the database, has improved the quality of the temperature record.

It is simple enough to test out which version of the pre-1980 temperature record is better. The version made by the people who lived through it, or the younger people now who are paid to generate graphs which show a lot of warming.  We can compare the two versions vs. historical accounts of ice and other observations.
It’s amazing how many people even today use a computer to do something you can do with a pencil and paper in less time.
– Richard P. Feynman
“Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, “Is it reasonable?”
– Richard P. Feynman
“The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific truth.”
– Richard P. Feynman
Glaciers and sea ice were rapidly shrinking during the first half of the 20th century.


ftp://ftp.library.noaa.gov/docs.lib/htdocs/rescue/mwr/064/mwr-064-02-c1.pdf









The Changing Face of the Arctic; The Changing Face of the Arctic – The New York Times
But a few years before 1960, things changed. Earth started cooling rapidly, and ice started expanding.




We have a number of historical data points. Let’s plot them on the different graphs and see which make sense. In the 1974 NCAR graph, ice melts at high temperatures, and forms at low temperatures.
But in the current NASA graph, Ice melts at low temperatures, and forms at high temperatures. This makes no sense and shows us that the graph is bogus.
Climate scientists colluded to make these worthless graphs.

If we look at only high quality temperature data from Australia, the graph makes sense.

But the official BOM graph makes no sense.

The 1979 US temperature graph from NASA made sense.

The current version makes no sense.
It is crystal clear that current official temperature graphs are nonsense.
“No government has the right to decide on the truth of scientific principles, nor to prescribe in any way the character of the questions investigated.”
– Richard Feynman
Government funded scientists say the Arctic is warming at an astonishing rate.
Scientists released this year’s Arctic Report Card on Tuesday, and it is a dismal one. Researchers say the Arctic continues to warm up at rates they call “astonishing.”

Arctic Is Warming At ‘Astonishing’ Rates, Researchers Say : The Two-Way : NPR
Almost 70 years ago, experts used the exact same words.
Dr. William S. Carlson, an Arctic expert, said last night that Polar icecaps were melting at an astonishing and unexplained rate and threatening to swamp seaports by raising ocean levels.
“The glaciers of Norway and Alaska,” he said, “are only half the size they were 50 years ago.”

Zeke seems to think his poor data practices supersede the historical record.
The exact same thing was done by Michael Mann to the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.




  


There was a time when climate scientists did actual science.  We need to return to that.
Dr. Roberts was spot on.

The summer of 1976 was the warmest and driest on record in England.

By 1977, California was experiencing their worst drought on record.




In 1936, the Australian Medical Congress was certain about the relationship between sunspots and natural disasters.

In 1932, scientists showed a close correspondence between sunspot cycles and past climate.

In 1994, astronomers showed a correlation between the length of sunspot cycles and Earth’s temperature.

The relationship between sunspots and grain prices has long been known.

This idea was first proposed by British astronomer William Herschel in 1801, and confirmed 200 years later.


Dr. Willett was spot on. We need real scientists like Willet and Walter Orr Roberts – not arrogant hacks like Mann and Hausfather.

Scientists now claim that a 0.0001 mole fraction increase in CO2 over the past century controls the climate.  This is because the Sun can’t be controlled, scientists can’t pretend they know how to prevent bad weather, and politicians can’t use sunspots as an excuse to raise taxes and control energy policy.

The 1:10,000 increase in atmospheric CO2 over the past century is equivalent to packing an extra two people into Madison Square Garden

People like Hausfather have been using bad data to promote imaginary climate change for over 150 years. Time to bring this episode to an end.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

New Video : “A Crime Against The Community”

Posted on October 12, 2019 by tonyheller
Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Record Cold In Boulder

Posted on October 12, 2019 by tonyheller
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Smoking Gun Of Fraud And Collusion

Posted on October 12, 2019 by tonyheller
Zeke claims that there was no cooling in the Southern Hemisphere from 1940-1960, and he uses NASA temperature graphs as his evidence.
He also says every group of government researchers around the world agrees about this.

This is in direct contradiction to what NOAA said in 1978, when they showed peak surface cooling in the Southern Hemisphere
This is easy to test, because there is only one country in the southern hemisphere with coherent long term data. Australia has twenty locations where temperatures have been continuously recorded back to the 1880s.
This group of stations shows that Australian temperatures peaked about a century ago, and reached their minimum during the 1970s. All metrics show the same thing.

Here is the list of stations used in this analysis.
ASN00040842.dly BRISBANE AERO   -27.3917 153.129
ASN00040223.dly BRISBANE AERO   -27.4178 153.114
ASN00040214.dly BRISBANE REGIONAL OFFICE   -27.4778 153.031
ASN00031011.dly CAIRNS AERO   -16.8736 145.746
ASN00031010.dly CAIRNS POST OFFICE   -16.9333 145.783
ASN00090015.dly CAPE OTWAY LIGHTHOUSE   -38.8556 143.513
ASN00044021.dly CHARLEVILLE AERO   -26.4139 146.256
ASN00044221.dly CHARLEVILLE AERO COMPARISON   -26.4147 146.261
ASN00044022.dly CHARLEVILLE POST OFFICE   -26.4025 146.238
ASN00048237.dly COBAR AIRPORT AWS   -31.5389 145.796
ASN00048244.dly COBAR COMPARISON   -31.4861 145.828
ASN00048027.dly COBAR MO   -31.484 145.829
ASN00048030.dly COBAR POST OFFICE   -31.5 145.8
ASN00014015.dly DARWIN AIRPORT   -12.4239 130.893
ASN00014040.dly DARWIN AIRPORT COMPARISON   -12.4227 130.884
ASN00014016.dly DARWIN POST OFFICE   -12.4 130.8
ASN00014161.dly DARWIN REGIONAL OFFICE   -12.4667 130.833
ASN00074128.dly DENILIQUIN (WILKINSON ST)   -35.5269 144.952
ASN00074210.dly DENILIQUIN AERO   -35.5333 144.967
ASN00074258.dly DENILIQUIN AIRPORT AWS   -35.5575 144.946
ASN00074039.dly DENILIQUIN FALKINER MEMORIAL   -35.3667 145.05
ASN00035264.dly EMERALD AIRPORT   -23.5694 148.176
ASN00035027.dly EMERALD POST OFFICE   -23.5267 148.162
ASN00065016.dly FORBES (CAMP STREET)   -33.3892 148.008
ASN00065103.dly FORBES AIRPORT AWS   -33.3627 147.921
ASN00055202.dly GUNNEDAH AIRPORT AWS   -30.9537 150.249
ASN00055023.dly GUNNEDAH POOL   -30.9841 150.254
ASN00055024.dly GUNNEDAH RESOURCE CENTRE   -31.0261 150.269
ASN00094029.dly HOBART (ELLERSLIE ROAD)   -42.8897 147.328
ASN00094008.dly HOBART AIRPORT   -42.8339 147.503
ASN00056242.dly INVERELL (RAGLAN ST)   -29.7796 151.112
ASN00056017.dly INVERELL COMPARISON   -29.7783 151.111
ASN00056018.dly INVERELL RESEARCH CENTRE   -29.7752 151.082
ASN00091218.dly LAUNCESTON (ELPHIN)   -41.45 147.167
ASN00091123.dly LAUNCESTON (MOUNT PLEASANT)   -41.4667 147.15
ASN00091049.dly LAUNCESTON (PUMPING STATION)   -41.5 147.2
ASN00091179.dly LAUNCESTON (RADIO STATION 7EX)   -41.45 147.15
ASN00091237.dly LAUNCESTON (TI TREE BEND)   -41.4194 147.122
ASN00091311.dly LAUNCESTON AIRPORT   -41.5492 147.214
ASN00091104.dly LAUNCESTON AIRPORT COMPARISON   -41.5397 147.203
ASN00033045.dly MACKAY AERO   -21.1706 149.179
ASN00033297.dly MACKAY COMPARISON   -21.1183 149.215
ASN00033119.dly MACKAY M.O   -21.1172 149.217
ASN00033046.dly MACKAY POST OFFICE   -21.15 149.183
ASN00086282.dly MELBOURNE AIRPORT   -37.6655 144.832
ASN00086384.dly MELBOURNE AIRPORT COMPARISON   -37.675 144.842
ASN00086071.dly MELBOURNE REGIONAL OFFICE   -37.8075 144.97
ASN00076031.dly MILDURA AIRPORT   -34.2358 142.087
ASN00076077.dly MILDURA POST OFFICE   -34.1833 142.2
ASN00026105.dly ROBE AIRFIELD   -37.1776 139.805
ASN00026026.dly ROBE COMPARISON   -37.1628 139.756
ASN00066062.dly SYDNEY (OBSERVATORY HILL)   -33.8607 151.205
ASN00066037.dly SYDNEY AIRPORT AMO   -33.9465 151.173
ASN00066196.dly SYDNEY HARBOUR (WEDDING CAKE W   -33.8414 151.263
ASN00066195.dly SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK (SYDNEY OL   -33.8521 151.065
ASN00072151.dly WAGGA WAGGA (KOORINGAL)   -35.1333 147.367
ASN00073127.dly WAGGA WAGGA AGRICULTURAL INSTI   -35.0517 147.349
ASN00072150.dly WAGGA WAGGA AMO   -35.1583 147.457
ASN00074114.dly WAGGA WAGGA RESEARCH CENTRE   -35.1311 147.309
ASN00052088.dly WALGETT AIRPORT AWS   -30.0372 148.122
ASN00052026.dly WALGETT COUNCIL DEPOT   -30.0236 148.122
The only plausible explanation for how all the agencies got it wrong, is that they colluded to produce the same graphs – as indicated in this Climategate e-mail

The Australian temperature graph from the Bureau of Meteorology is not only fake, but it hides all of the hot temperatures before 1910. It in no way represents Australia temperatures

January, 1896 was the hottest month on record in New South Wales, and BOM hides the heat.






It was also hot in Europe in 1896.

A ten day heatwave during August 1896 killed thousands of people in the US, many of them in New York.

Arizona’s record heatwave over 120F occurred in 1896.

1896 was also a momentous year for climate science, when it started down the path of junk science, superstition and hiding and manipulating data
As early as in 1896, Swedish physicist Arrhenius proposed that the presence of atmospheric greenhouse gases may result in warmer surface temperatures on Earth than a simple radiative balance would imply. A comparison between measured surface temperatures and estimated effective temperatures (assuming the planets behave like black bodies and are at radiational equilibrium) of the planets in our solar system has later revealed that planets with thick atmospheres, such as Venus and Earth, have a warmer surface than a simple radiation equilibrium can explain (Houghton 1991). The high surface temperature can be attributed to the greenhouse effect proposed by Arrhenius
The climate science was an actual science, its participants would want to understand the heat of the past – rather than hide it.
Posted in Uncategorized | 17 Comments

New Green Deal Beta Testers

Posted on October 12, 2019 by tonyheller
Posted in Uncategorized | 17 Comments

Balls Of Fire Fell Like Meteors

Posted on October 12, 2019 by tonyheller
On October 8, 1871 the worst fires in US history occurred. Chicago burned to the ground, as did many other towns around Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. Peshtigo, Wisconsin was hardest hit, with more than 1,000 dead.
Balls of fire were observed to fall like meteors in different parts of the town.
It seemed as if the love of God had been withdrawn from the place, and the fury fiends of hell had been loosened to wantonly vex and torment the people.
Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

New Video : A Very Ugly Rewrite Of Climate History

Posted on October 11, 2019 by tonyheller
Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

The Worthless Temperature Record From South America

Posted on October 11, 2019 by tonyheller
Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Time Travelling Climate Scientists

Posted on October 11, 2019 by tonyheller
Zeke Hausfather has determined that he knows more about the weather of the 1970s, than all of the scientists who were studying it at the time.
By definition, the temperatures recorded 40+ years ago are at least 40 years old.  Zeke is arguing that history should be ignored, because it is old. He thinks he knows better than the scientists who actually observed the global cooling in the 1970s, like NCAR, the National Academy of Sciences, and NOAA.
NOAA showed cooling in both hemispheres from both surface and radiosonde measurements.

NOAA
There was no question earth was cooling sharply after the 1940s. Ice was increasing. Ice doesn’t lie, but climate scientists do.






Forty-two top American and European researchers sent a letter to the president warning that the current rate of cooling would lead to a new ice age in about a century.

This Climategate email shows that scientists at multiple agencies and different countries colluded to remove the warmth of the 1940s, and subsequent cooling.

Zeke brags that they are using a lot more stations now, but note that there has been essentially no change in historical coverage.  All they have done is add a lot of fragmented, low quality data which scientists 40 years ago were wise enough to ignore. In the 1970s they used only high quality data, because they were actual scientists.

The only thing Zeke has accomplished is he has added a huge number of broken, fragmented stations.  Here is every single daily temperature record for Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay in the GHCN database. The vast majority of these stations should never have been used.
Zeke claims they have millions of ocean temperatures from the “mid-century period”

In this Climategate e-mail, Phil Jones said much of the Southern Hemisphere data was “made up.”

NASA didn’t even pretend to have usable pre-1950 ocean data until about 15 years ago.
The methodology for collecting ocean data has created an error bar which is much greater than the claimed trend.
Zeke claims that all of these independent agencies agree, but when Gavin Schmidt at NASA was confronted obviously fraudulent temperatures in Iceland, he responded by saying his data comes from NOAA. There is nothing independent about the data.

Senator Malcolm Roberts confronted Schmidt about this data tampering.

Gavin responded with this ad hominem attack.
Then he responded by saying that NASA data actually comes from NOAA. So there is nothing independent about the data sets.
Zeke claims there were no cooling outside of the Northern Hemisphere higher-latitude regions

The US is the only large area with a high quality long term temperature record, and it shows sharp cooling into the 1970s, and temperatures no warmer now than 80 years ago.
Summers were much hotter in the US 80 years ago.

Courtesy of https://realclimatescience.com/

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Thursday, October 10, 2019

UKRAINE & THE POLITICAL CLASS! Obama, Soros, Biden, Romney, Kerry, McCain, Pelosi, Schiff, Mueller & Clinton are tied to sketchy Ukraine deals. READ UP!

Follow the Money. Obama and his Justice Department approved of all of these deals for a CUT of the proceeds.

Obama, Biden, Romney, Kerry, McCain, Pelosi, Schiff, Mueller & Clinton are tied to so many sketchy Ukraine deals. But it does not stop there. Look for the money trail to lead to Romania, Kazakhstan and other corrupt despotic countries.

Its how Corrupt Politicians work.

Romney, Kerry, Biden, McCain, Pelosi, Schiff, Mueller & Clinton are all tied to sketchy Ukraine deals. No wonder they want to impeach President Trump!

Anytime you have Politicians getting overly aggressive about shady deals by one of their own... all you have to do is Follow the Money!

Here are some irrefutable facts. The simple question to ask is... did any of these fools go to college and get any kind of training in Oil and Gas Exploration? Did any of them have a resume with expertise in this field?

Answer is HELL NO!. They were all connected someone who knew someone who was an influential Politician.
Take Mitt Romney's top adviser, Joseph Cofer Black. He joined the board of the Ukraine energy firm, Burisma, while Hunter Biden was also serving on the board. Hunter Biden was taking a salary of $50,000 per month from Burisma, and was simultaneously engaged in a relationship with John Kerry's stepson, Chris Heinz, and mobster Whitey Bulger's nephew, in a private equity firm, that allegedly appeared to be laundering millions of dollars in foreign money from China & the Ukraine, through Latvia, and back to the US. 

Romney's adviser, Joseph Cofer Black, trained for covert operations and eventually became the director of the National Counterterrorism Center. After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks perpetrated by al-Qaeda, Black was appointed ambassador at large and coordinator for counterterrorism in December 2002 by President George W. Bush. John Brennan succeeded Black in his job as director of the National Counterterrorism Center. Cofer Black left the CIA in 2006 to join Blackwater, the huge contractor for services related to military and intelligence action, where he served as Vice Chairman until 2008. See all the ties that bind?

It appears that Romney, Kerry, Biden, McCain, Pelosi, Clinton, Mueller and Schiff all have ties to Ukrainian firms. VP Biden bragged on camera that he was able to force the former Ukraine President to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son, Hunter, by threatening to withhold $1 BILLION in US loans from Ukraine - all with approval from Obama!
While Communist China ran $1.5 BILLION through the Biden/Heinz private equity firm to purchase US companies with military ties, John Kerry, as Secretary of State, approved questionable acquisitions that threatened national security, but enriched his family and friends.
Kurt Volker, who served as the U.S. Ambassador to NATO under Obama, and was just fired from the Trump White House as special envoy to Ukraine, is the executive director of the John McCain Institute.
Nancy Pelosi's son, Paul Pelosi Jr., is involved in oil importing from Ukraine and his company, Viscoil, is under investigation for securities fraud. In 2015, Pelosi used the Air Force to fly her entire family to Ukraine at a cost of over $185,000. Nancy Pelosi's legislative aide, Ivanna Voronovych, is from Ukraine and is connected to the Ukrainian Embassy, the Ukrainian military, the Ukrainian government and Ukrainian party life. Pelosi and Schiff are also both connected to a Ukrainian arms dealer. 

We also know that Ukraine was involved in helping the Clinton campaign fabricate evidence against Paul Manafort to smear the Trump campaign and the firm the DNC used to "inspect" Hillary's email server, Crowdstrike, is funded by anti-Russian Ukrainian Oligarchs and run by a man who used to work for Mueller at the FBI!

Most concerning of all, the former CEO of Danske Bank in Estonia, Aivar Rehe, a bank known for money laundering during the years Obama and Biden were in office, was just found dead in his yard. He was a witness for the prosecution in a $220 BILLION money laundering scandal involving transfers to Latvia.

Rudy Giuliani intimated that this corrupt banking network was likely used by Biden & pals to launder foreign $ from the Ukraine & China - to Latvia, Cyprus and on to America. Records show that some 10,000 "non-resident" accounts were involved. Giuliani says he began investigating Joe Biden before he announced his run for President and that more "corroborating" evidence is forthcoming.
Rudy Giuliani, who was once James Comey's boss, and the former Mayor of New York during 9/11, took down the mob and runs one of the biggest private investigation firms in the world. Don't underestimate Rudy. He already has videotaped interviews of the Ukraine prosecutor that Biden forced out of office. 

It appears that Obama's administration was helping George Soros, the defacto head of the Democrat party, control & take over the former Soviet state of Ukraine to steal her wealth & resources. Soros also used Obama's DOJ & Mueller's pal, Andrew Weissmann, to prosecute & seize assets from Soros' foreign competitors under guise of corruption.
We shall hopefully soon see all the rest of the ties that bind.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-25/police-reassess-search-as-ex-danske-ceo-in-estonia-feared-dead

https://nationalfile.com/breaking-nancy-pelosis-son-was-exec-at-gas-company-that-did-business-in-ukraine/

https://www.baltictimes.com/trump_s_attorney_giuliani_mentions_latvia_while_accusing_biden_and_his_son_in_corruption/

https://nypost.com/2019/09/23/giuliani-accuses-ukraine-of-laundering-millions-to-bidens-son/

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/26/top-romney-adviser-worked-with-hunter-biden-on-board-of-ukrainian-energy-company/

https://www.dcclothesline.com/2019/09/30/bombshell-pelosi-and-schiff-connected-to-a-ukrainian-arms-dealer/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7494633/Rudy-Giuliani-claims-Ukraine-laundered-3-million-Bidens-son-VP-prosecutor-fired.html

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2019/09/26/mccain-institute-head-kurt-volker-center-trump-ukraine-probe-asu-arizona-state-university/3776962002/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/breaking-update-speaker-pelosi-and-adam-schiff-connected-to-prominent-ukrainian-arms-dealer-photos/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/26/former-mitt-romney-adviser-sits-on-burisma-board-of-directors/

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3023025/senator-wants-inquiry-whether-conflict-interest-led-us

https://newspunch.com/crowdstrike-analyst-dnc-servers-mueller/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/exclusive-obamas-state-and-justice-departments-assisted-billionaire-and-democrat-donor-george-soros-in-attempt-to-control-ukraines-oil-and-gas-industry/
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Did You Know There’s a Treaty Between the USA & Ukraine Regarding Cooperation For Prosecuting Crimes signed by Bill Clinton?


Did You Know There’s a Treaty Between the USA & Ukraine Regarding Cooperation For Prosecuting Crimes signed by Bill Clinton?
It does not say this treaty is null and void if a corrupt person is running for Political office !


CLICK HERE AND GET THE DETAILS!
https://dcwhispers.com/doh-did-you-know-theres-a-treaty-between-the-usa-ukraine-regarding-cooperation-for-prosecuting-crimes/

Additionally. A President would be derelict in his duty as the Chief Executive if he did not execute his duties as President.
Lefty Ideologues hell bent on trying to steal America and "Fundamentally Transform" it into a George Soros envisioned Social Oligopoly ignore the Rule of Law and argue pathetic impeachment theories including that Donald Trump "used his office" to investigate a Corrupt Joe Biden's pay for play scheme in the Ukraine.

Article Two of the United States Constitution states

The president must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the Constitution imposes a duty on the president to enforce the laws of the United States and is called the Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause or Faithfully Executed Clause.

It must be noted that the fact that Joe Biden was possibly corrupt was already known... with no actual investigation done. 

Once this possible crime was known to the President.. based on the Treaty with Ukraine and on the fact that  Biden actually boasted about it.. it is required he investigate!

 SO THERE ! MORONS WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS!



 




 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Saturday, September 28, 2019

DEEP STATE ANTI AMERICA OPERATIVES WITHIN THE DEEP STATE Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed.

BREAKING: DEEP STATE ANTI AMERICA OPERATIVES WITHIN THE DEEP STATE Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed.

WHO THE FUCK IS "THE INTEL COMMUNITY"? These people involved MUST BE BROUGHT UP AND WATER BOARDED IF NECESSARY TO GET|THE TRUTH AS TO WHO MODIFIED THE FORM !


This is a major, major development in the Trump-Ukraine saga and it points exactly at what a lot of people suspected.


The Federalist’s Sean Davis has discovered that the intel community secretly changed the rules governing whistle-blowers, including amending the required form, in order to allow 2nd hand information to suffice. This happened just days before the Trump-Ukraine whistle-blower filed his complaint.
The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”
The internal properties of the newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” form, which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) requires to be submitted under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), show that the document was uploaded on September 24, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public. The markings on the document state that it was revised in August 2019, but no specific date of revision is disclosed…
…A previous version of the whistleblower complaint document, which the ICIG and DNI until recently provided to potential whistleblowers, declared that any complaint must contain only first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing and that complaints that provide only hearsay, rumor, or gossip would be rejected.
“The [Intelligence Community Inspector General] cannot transmit information via the ICPWA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing,” the previous form stated under the bolded heading “FIRST-HAND INFORMATION REQUIRED.” “This includes information received from another person, such as when an employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing.”
“If you think that wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions, [the Intelligence Community Inspector General] will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA,” the form concluded.
Many have been baffled by the ability of the whistle-blower to file a complaint and force the release of a classified transcript based on nothing but 2nd and 3rd hand, illegal leaks. Now we know how that was possible. The Intel Community changed the rules at the same time the complaint was being written.
Trending


Here’s the biggest red flag with that. That complaint was so well written, so thorough, that there’s noway it wasn’t done over the course of weeks with involvement of others. Yet, it was submitted just days after this rule change was finalized and the news forms revised. That points directly at the whistle-blower and his team not only being aware the rule change would happen, but that the rule change was made specifically for them.
Here’s another issue that’s going to be pressed in the coming days. Was the form even really revised in August? Because the actual form that claims an August revision was only actually released two days ago on September 25th. It looks like it could be back-fill to cover up the intel community originally breaking the rules by allowing the complaint.
This complaint is looking more and more like a coordinated hit. The way it was written, the timeline involved, the way Adam Schiff knew about it weeks before it was even filed, and now this rule change which made it even possible. It’s all too much to be coincidence.
Certainly, the mainstream media will ignore this as they always do. The real test will be whether certain conservatives who’ve been defending all this the past few days will now begin to question their presumptions.
For all the gnashing of teeth and sneering condemnations hurled at those who have used the term “deep state,” that’s what this is. This is un-elected, secret government officials trying to remove a President and being willing to do whatever it takes to accomplish that.
It’s out in the open now and it has to be reckoned with.

AG BARR MUST GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS QUICKLY AND PROSECUTE THE TRAITORS NOW . WE DEMAND IT!
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

There is a Civil War coming! America's 2nd Civil War will be fought in the MegaCity Centers. MAGA BATTALIONS MUST BE FORMED AND READY! They will uses all the alphabet agencies to attack us!

 The Socialist Leftists and Oligopolists have been preparing to steal America for years! They were doing it a little piece at a time right in plain sight! 

I predict that they will use the all the tools at their disposal to attack the fabric of American life using their Negro Hordes and the Antifa Thugs as their front line of attack and the Democrat run Cities like Chicago and Baltimore and New York will become hell holes of looting and violence. The Politicians will do nothing and will work to destabilize America.

Mark my words they will not start it. They will incrementally take away our freedoms a little at a time hope that most will not notice until it is too late to fight back.

We must start the counter attack incrementally as well. A protest here... a beating of an Alphabet Agency goon there. Asymmetrical warfare is the only way we have a chance to counter the intelligence gathering apparatus of the Illegal Government forces! Will we be ready or will whine as usual? Will our Conservative talking heads do more than write books and whine on radio and TV?

The terrified Conservatives will call anyone calling for the fight a "Fed" or a Government Tool. Its their defense to stay cowards and do nothing to fight back. Some of these Faux Conservatives are really the Government Propagandists themselves calling us names to cover their own propaganda. Call them out!

We are the ONLY line of defense there is! Unless we mobilize now we will be caught flat footed!
George Soros  https://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2019/04/read-why-george-soros-is-enemy-of.html  and his hundred of little companies names all kinds of different names all with the same purpose have been using his money and our laziness and ignorance to chip away at our freedoms and our Constitution. Read through my blog www.john-gaultier.blogspot.com and you will see all the various tricks they have used.  BUT enough of all that.

As you have seen with the roll out of the FAKE UKRAINE IMPEACHMENT SCHEME.. THIS IS WAR. DONALD TRUMP ACTUALLY SAID THAT!

Its time to mobilize!
Every city every town needs to start putting together MAGA BATTALIONS.  Patriotic former Military men who were colonels or higher rank with experience in fighting in cities need to step up and start meeting volunteers who have credibility and vouchability.. and train them. This battle will take place on city blocks and not battle fields.. it will be in places that feel like Falouja and not the Rice paddies of Vietnam. The techniques and tactics are different.

We will join active duty military to fight the Socialist Hordes!

How do we do that ? Here is a Primer>

What a MAGA BATTALION Megacities Unit Would Look Like!
 


(I have copied some excellent pointers from

Every year, more and more of the world’s population moves into cities. The number of megacities is growing exponentially. Both of these global patterns and their inevitable consequences for military operations are well documented. 

In an American Civil war to be fought for the Control of our destiny.. MAKE NO MISTAKE IT WILL BE FOUGHT IN THE CITIES. THE FARM LAND AND THE SUBURBS WILL BELONG TO THE PATRIOT BRIGADES.

But we still do not have units that are even remotely prepared to operate in megacities. If we want to find success on the urban battlefields the US Army and or Maga Battalions will inevitably find itself fighting on in the future, that needs to change.

Throughout history, military forces either sought to avoid or simply had no need to engage in urban combat. Most military doctrine, and the strategic theory it is built upon, encourages land forces to bypass, lay siege to, or—if required—isolate and slowly clear cities from the outside in. The great armies of the world have historically fought for cities rather than in cities, a distinction with a significant difference. In cases where military forces had no choice but to operate within cities, the environment, almost without exception, proved very costly in both military and civilian casualties. Today, many armies have accepted that global population growth and urbanization trends will increasingly force military operations into crowded cities, and military forces must therefore be capable of conducting the full range of operations in large, dense urban areas. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley recently remarked that the Army “has been designed, manned, trained and equipped for the last 241 years to operate primarily in rural areas.” But that is about to change. Milley continued:

In the future, I can say with very high degrees of confidence, the American Army is probably going to be fighting in urban areas. . . . We need to man, organize, train and equip the force for operations in urban areas, highly dense urban areas, and that’s a different construct. We’re not organized like that right now.
But despite the clear recognition that armed forces will increasingly be required to fight in urban areas, no army has committed to train, organize, and equip forces specifically to operate in cities. It is time for the US Army and Maga Batallions  to do just that.

A 2016 United Nations report estimated 54.5 percent of the world’s population lived in urban areas. By 2030, that percentage is projected to rise to 60 percent. As a result of this rural-to-urban migration, cities themselves are growing. In 2016, there were 512 cities with at least one million inhabitants globally. By 2030, a projected 662 cities will have at least one million residents. And the number of “megacities” in the world—those with ten million residents or more—is projected to grow from thirty-one to forty-one in the same period.
In 2014, the chief of staff of the Army’s Strategic Studies Group (SSG) chose megacities to be the organizing theme for its yearlong research projects. Concept teams looked at the unique characteristics and challenges of a megacity, future maneuver and mobility concepts, Army force design considerations, personnel talent management, and other topics, assessing the requirements for operating in megacities. The conclusions of the SSG research are clear: megacities are unavoidable, they are potentially the most challenging environment the Army has ever faced, and the Army is unprepared to operate in them. The SSG also recommended that the Army, charged with the mandate of preparing forces for sustained operations on land, take the lead in training, organizing, and equipping forces for megacities.
As William Adamson noted in his 2015 Parameters article, “Megacities and the US Army,” the research conducted by the SSG was not the first to take a long and hard look at the challenges of large urban areas. Adamson highlighted a 2000 Government Accounting Office report, which noted that “despite a growing unease that the urban environment is a known vulnerability of US forces, DoD has not made a major commitment to dramatically improve urban capabilities.” Shortly after this, the 2001 Defense Planning Guidance commissioned a study and eighteen-month project that resulted in the Joint Urban Operations (JUO) Master Plan 2012–2017.
Interest in the megacities problem did not stop after the SSG study. The Army’s 2014 Unified Quest wargames included megacities scenarios in its study of future operational environments. The US Army Training and Doctrine Command’s Mad Scientist project continues to look at technological solutions to the challenges posed by megacities. Multiple organizations and agencies continue to assess the Army’s capabilities gaps through the standard Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) framework.
But despite all of this study, no change has been made to the Army of today to prepare for tomorrow’s operations in megacities—a tomorrow that could be here very soon.
One ongoing military study of megacities is the NATO Urbanization Project. Initiated in 2014, it is a conceptual study of potential crisis situations in urban systems, consequences of urbanization, and the impact on NATO military operations. The project includes seventeen NATO nations, sixteen NATO Centers of Excellence, and representatives of academia and industry.
In the project’s most recent experiment, the NATO team conducted a wargame to determine the capabilities needed to achieve the goals of three likely missions in 2035: response to mass migration, natural disaster, and inner-city turmoil. Within these missions, the wargame specified that a brigade conduct three operations in a megacity—joint forcible entry, major combat, and subsequent stability operations—without unacceptable levels of military or civilian casualties. On top of identifying capabilities gaps in mobility, command and control, and intelligence, the study found that normal employment concepts and force packages for a brigade were wholly inadequate. In future experiments, game participants will be given 5,000 personnel (the high end of a conventional brigade’s manpower) and asked to design a force specifically for the urban environment.
Training, manning, and equipping a 5,000-soldier force to specialize in urban operations would be a novel concept; no military force in the world has attempted this endeavor despite the well-documented challenges of military operations in dense urban terrain.
The US Army purposely avoids specialization. The Army’s Brigade Combat Team (BCT) structure of light infantry, mechanized infantry, and armored formations are specifically designed for global deployment to conduct any and all missions. While these “general purpose forces” may be designed for major combat operations against near-peer adversaries, they are expected to be able to adapt their force structure to any enemy in any environment.
There are a few exceptions—like the Army’s 75th Ranger Regiment, designed for “large-scale joint forcible entry operations while simultaneously executing surgical special operations raids across the globe.” But the “general purpose” rule holds true for the bulk of Army units. For example, even BCTs that are given special peacetime missions, like those that serve as the opposing force at one of the Army’s three combat training centers or testing modernization concepts and equipment, are required to maintain readiness for wartime missions just like any other unit in the Army. But the degree of specialized training, manning, and equipment required to effectively fight in megacities is incompatible with the “general purpose” approach.
Of course, urban warfare is not exclusively a future phenomenon. Much has been learned from urban battles in recent history: the Siege of Sarajevo (1992–95); the Battle of Mogadishu (1993); Russian operations in Grozny (1994–95 and 1999–2000); US operations in Baghdad (2003) and Fallujah (2004); Lebanese operations in Nahr al-Bared, Lebanon (2007); and the Second Battle of Donetsk (2014–15). But the broad lessons of these cases have yet to truly inform Army training for urban combat, which for most units consists mainly of tactical training (e.g., room clearing drills with four-man teams). The Army would be much better served by the creation of an entire unit dedicated to preparing to operate in dense urban environments, particularly megacities.
The lessons from recent cases of urban warfare and the many studies on the unique requirements posed by operating in a megacity can be used to design such a unit today. Starting from scratch, a unit could be built based on the specific requirements we know a megacity would call for. The unit leadership would need extreme flexibility and authority in manning, staffing, and equipping. The first attempt will inevitably not be right. But it will be a starting point from which to examine remaining unanswered questions: What are the necessary skills of an urban warrior? What is the right mix of enablers and cross-trained soldiers? What are the best movement and maneuver techniques? If megacities represent a unique unit of analysis, how will that inform this new unit’s mission planning?
We know we will be fighting in megacities and that it will pose major new challenges. Successfully meeting these challenges requires bold action—and requires it now. A new unit would serve as the primary learning organization for the Army and the vanguard of development of planning and doctrine for fighting in megacities.
Both recent studies and global trends forecast the unavoidable deployment of military forces to achieve national objectives in megacities. Given this, committing 5,000 soldiers to man, train, and equip a unit designed specifically to prepare for such a deployment would be a bold insurance plan, and the right choice.

SO...
One of the principal counterarguments  is that any discussion of the Army’s future role in megacity operations is pointless. Operating in such a complex domain is an impossible mission and, therefore, not one we will undertake. But there are many scenarios, including natural disaster situations, that would—despite the most concerted efforts to avoid them—call for the use of military forces in megacities to protect national interests. Even Gen. Mark Milley has stated that the Army must be prepared to operate in dense urban terrain. Given the range of potential unforeseen events that could pull us into megacities and the service leadership’s views, the Army should organize, train, and equip units for these operations.
Megacities cannot be ruled no-go areas for military forces. The intent of the Army as outlined by U.S.C. Title 10 is to be “capable, in conjunction with the other armed forces, of—(1) preserving the peace and security, and providing for the defense, of the United States, the Commonwealths and possessions, and any areas occupied by the United States; (2) supporting the national policies; (3) implementing the national objectives; and (4) overcoming any nations responsible for aggressive acts that imperil the peace and security of the United States.” These are global requirements. And the globe is increasingly made up of megacities. As I pointed out in my first article, by 2030 there will be 662 cities around the world with at least one million inhabitants (compared to 512 today) and 60 percent of the world’s population will live in cities. The potential for operations in dense urban areas will rise correspondingly, presenting a challenge the Army cannot ignore.
Another counterargument is that the 5,000-soldier unit I proposed would never be enough—that a megacity operation is an Army corps-level mission or that a city of ten million inhabitants would swallow any size unit. These criticisms argue essentially that megacities are simply too challenging for military forces. I agree that for a range of missions and situations, a single brigade of 5,000 soliders would not be enough. But there is also an array of feasible missions where a single brigade could achieve military objectives. The point is that creating and experimenting with a unit focused on preparing for operations in a megacity would provide insights across the DOTMLPF-P (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy) framework that will inform the entire Army’s planning and training. During urban contingencies, the unit would serve as the vanguard of the opening phase of the operation.
I chose a 5,000-soldier unit because that is roughly equivalent to the largest US Army Brigade Combat Team (a Stryker BCT, with 4,500). I also chose it because the BCT is the major combat force element used as the “building block” for Army and joint operations in Defense Planning Scenarios or Strategic Choices and Management Reviews to determine force structure. The Army also uses BCTs in Unified Quest wargames and its Deep Futures exercises to identify capability gaps and solutions to future challenges. The BCT is the unit of measure.
One of the first steps towards imagining a megacity unit is to provide a probable scenario and define the missions the unit would be designed and trained to accomplish. The scenario used by the NATO Urbanization Project seminar wargame is a good start. The wargame envisioned three missions: joint forcible entry; combat operations (offensive and defensive) against conventional, hybrid, and unconventional threats; and security operations after a man-made disaster to stabilize, secure, and facilitate the transition of efforts to a follow-on force. These missions could be used to develop and prioritize the new unit’s mission essential task list.
By using a current brigade force package, each of the unit’s warfighting functions of mission command, movement and maneuver, intelligence, fires, sustainment, and protection can be tailored and assessed against the challenges of military operations in dense urban areas, particularly megacities. A Stryker Brigade Combat Team is an appropriate starting point to build out a megacities unit because it was designed to address many of the gaps between light infantry and heavier armor brigades. Many of the Stryker BCT’s design attributes—speed, deployability, robust infantry forces, mobile protected firepower, and advanced technologies—will be needed in a megacities unit. So what subordinate units would such a unit include?
3 Battalions of Mobile Infantry

Each battalion would be airborne to facilitate forcible entry operations when needed. (Drop zones in megacities are necessarily limited, but even the densest cities have airfields, parks, or even landfills.) Until a new infantry fighting vehicle is fielded for the urban environment, two battalions would have Strykers and one would have Bradley Fighting Vehicles. These platforms provide dismounted infantry the integrated high-angle protected firepower necessary to meet the extreme elevation requirements of urban terrain. These mobile firepower platforms should continue to be integrated with evolving guided, scalable (adjustable multi-purpose warheads) missile systems.

The ability to maneuver forces is one of the biggest challenges of the dense urban environment. New combat vehicle platforms will be needed. The Abrams tank, Bradley, and Stryker range in width from eight to twelve feet. Many of the developing cities of the world are built upon ancient infrastructure with narrow roads—like central Baghdad’s Adhamiyah District. Others have vast tracts of unplanned and chaotically organized networks of similarly narrow passageways—like Mumbai’s Dharavi slum. Such constraints require dismounted infantry to separate from their mobile protective fire. When I first heard hover bikes mentioned for military operations, I was extremely skeptical. But with highly trained soldiers, equipped with weaponry, and protection, these vehicles or others with similarly small size and high maneuverability would be measurably more valuable than current vehicles that are simply too big to operate in dense terrain.

The ability to communicate with the population will also become a requirement. The tactical use of social media, internet, and co-opted local networks (like emergency alert systems) will be needed, but equally important will be the skills to develop the right message—language, culture, narrative. Military Information Support Operations units have historically not been a component of maneuver units but should be made organic, instead of a requested enabler.

It is clear that megacities will require major changes to today’s fighting vehicles, weapons, and equipment. Every aspect of the “shoot, move, and communicate” framework is challenged by the urban environment. Current systems will have to be modified, new capabilities and technologies implemented. Depression and elevation capabilities of weapons will have to be increased. The paradigm of adaptable organizational design of fighting formations will be challenged in every aspect, from equipment design to the formations themselves.

1 Armor Battalion

A tank battalion trained for the specifics of urban warfare is crucial. Yes, they’re too big and too unwieldy for large sections of dense cities—but not entire cities. And where they can be brought to bear, they can offer the necessary decisive advantage on the urban battlefield. Historical urban warfare case studies repeatedly show the demand for mobile, protected firepower.

The ability to combine armor and infantry into decentralized fighting teams, with armor supporting infantry, infantry supporting armor, has been shown to be key to success in urban fighting. An army that can execute combined arms maneuver with precision indirect fire and air support overwhelms enemies even in urban terrain.


Israeli troops, supported by a tank, conduct operations in Nablus. (Credit: Israel Defense Forces)

Urban operations demand decentralized, small-unit operations at the tactical level, with junior leaders capable of operating independently. Much of the fighting in Iraq was by company- and platoon-level teams of infantry, armor, aviation, sniper, and intelligence, all combined at the lowest level under the command of captains and lieutenants.

The three infantry battalions and one armor battalion should be trained much like the combined-arms Armor Brigade Combat Teams (ABCTs) deployed to Iraq. These would be companies of Strykers, Bradley, and tanks platoons with organic intelligence teams and enablers to conduct independent operations within the cities.
1 Fires Battalion

Much has been learned and continues to be learned from the current fight in Mosul, Iraq about the integration of fire support to maximize effectiveness, while minimizing collateral damage, through the use of precision joint fires.

War in a megacity will also require protection systems. The counter–unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) mission is quickly becoming a vital capability requirement in urban warfare. Current conflict zones like Iraq and Ukraine show a growing use and weaponization of civilian UAS. Both members of the Army and members of Congress have recognized the immediate requirement for a new “highly maneuverable, short-range air defense system” to protect soldiers from enemy drones, helicopters, and attack aircraft.
1 Multifunctional Engineer Battalion

Engineers tailored for urban warfare must have enhanced capabilities for mobility and counter-mobility. In particular, they need to be able to emplace obstacles (e.g., concrete walls) to isolate enemy forces, canalize enemy movement to facilitate targeting, and deny access to critical or high-risk areas. Urban terrain also allows for complex obstacles to be emplaced. Doing so—and reducing obstacles—places engineers at the forefront of urban operations.


Army engineers emplace concrete T-walls along Main Supply Route Tampa in Iraq. (Credit: Spc. Kiyoshi Freeman, US Army)

The use of “mouse holing,” creating holes in walls to allow soldiers to move between adjacent buildings rather than exposing themselves on the street, has been seen in many urban battles. This is just one example of a mobility tactic unique to urban terrain, which an environment-specific engineer unit could further develop.

The battalion would also need licensed professional civil engineers. This qualification is an added individual development goal in existing engineer units, but not a unit capability. Knowledge of civil works will be critical to military operations in dense urban terrain. We learned the hard way in Iraq how infrastructure destruction hampers military efforts in population-centric conflicts. This will be even more true in megacities, where understanding and protecting immensely complex critical infrastructure networks could be as important as protecting the population.
1 Multifunctional Aviation Battalion

Operations in a megacity will require many of the same aviation capabilities of attack, reconnaissance, assault, and medical evacuation used in operations in less dense terrain, but with considerable constraints. Megacities offer limited landing and pickup zones. Flying close enough to soldiers on the ground to provide air support is made more difficult by powerlines, antennas and satellites on rooftops, and narrow flight patterns between buildings. There is high risk to slow-moving aircraft from small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades. Current developments in aviation armament systems and vertical lift for precision personnel and cargo resupply would be a significant addition to a standard aviation unit.


Rooftops in Cairo. (Credit: Myrna Machuca-Sierra)
1 Support Battalion

The complexities of a megacity are not confined to mobility and maneuver. Providing support, services, and maintenance to decentralized units will be difficult. It will require support organizations with more capabilities than they have today, such as rapid prototyping to allow the unit to evolve quickly as our understanding of the environment’s requirements change; on-demand additive manufacturing to increase self-sufficiency; and drone resupply and transport to make up for the restrictions on manned aviation platforms.
1 Military Intelligence Battalion

Wargames and studies demonstrate the heightened intelligence demands of military operations in megacities. The ability to understand the enemy, terrain, weather, and civilian considerations cannot happen without a robust military intelligence capability. With the increased density of both people and infrastructure, there is also an increased information density, creating unique intelligence challenges and more challenging intelligence requirements. For this reason, a megacities unit should have an entire intelligence battalion instead of the existing military intelligence company organic to BCTs.

A megacity-focused military intelligence package would need to include robust human intelligence collection capabilities, including social media. Enhanced tactical signals intelligence capabilities would allow for more rapid targeting, necessary in a highly dynamic urban environment. And dedicated reach back channels should be created where either collection or analysis resources cannot be pushed to the BCT level, so as to further speed the F3EAD process (find–fix–finish–exploit–analyze).

Decentralized small units would need intelligence capabilities currently in battalion and BCT headquarters. Intelligence officers should be assigned to every maneuver company. The creation of Company Intelligence Support Teams (COIST) demonstrated great results in Iraq. COISTs were discontinued in the current BCT modernization plans, but should be included in the BCT built for urban operations. The military intelligence battalion should therefore be organized in a modular fashion, so resources can be flexed to individual COISTs on a rapid, needs-based basis.
1 Cyber Electromagnetic Activities (CEMA) Battalion

The particulars of a CEMA unit is still in development, but the diverse capabilities being combined are the exact capabilities that will be needed at the tactical level in a hyper-connected complex city. Electronic Warfare capabilities to detect, jam, and deceive enemy sensors and communications, while protecting the unit’s own GPS, communications, and control technologies is critical. Offensive and defensive tactical cyber capabilities are also necessary.
1 Explosive Ordnance (EOD) Battalion

EOD will be present in all tactical operations of an urban unit, rather than an attached capability as it is today. The BCT’s survivability will depend on EOD capabilities in dense urban areas where improvised explosive devices and booby-trapped structures and drones have become common. Like the military intelligence battalion, this should be a modular unit, capable of operating centralized and in support of the BCT commander’s overall mission, or broken up to integrate fully with units down to the platoon and even squad level.
This force package would allow for the forming of multi-domain combat teams (infantry, armor, cyber, intelligence, information operations) all the way down to the company and platoon level needed to operate and win in megacities and dense urban terrain.
The urban BCT would be different in other important ways than today’s BCTs, specifically in their organizational commitment to three principles.
Rapid experimentation, structure changes, and equipment fielding. The urban BCT will provide an organizational base for rapid experimentation, equipment fielding, and structural change. The unit would need advanced capabilities from Army and Department of Defense labs, academia, and industry. Many of the proposed soldier and unit enhancements, such as robotics, population mapping, sensors, scalable-effects weapons and munitions, and soldier and command networked communication and control systems, could all be inserted for experimentation and testing while training for megacity operations.
The proposed urban BCT structure, outlined here, is only a starting point. Brigade combat teams are force packages that have, as one of their core design principles, the ability to adapt to a wide range of environments. A megacity unit must be designed with a capability one step further—not only to evolve in response to our constantly refined understanding of the unique requirements of big cities, but to evolve rapidly to fit the needs of each city’s unique characteristics once deployed. Unlike existing units that conduct experimentation, such as the brigade that until recently was permanently assigned to the Joint Modernization Command, which must maintain their BCT organization, a megacity unit would need authorities to radically and rapidly change its organization. The unit would also need addition funding lines in its authorizations to support changes.
Unit personnel management exceptions to policy. BCTs are not only the Army’s building blocks, but also a key Army leader development tool. Almost every officer in a brigade is doing on-the-job training because he or she has never held that particular position before. This practice is a great strength but also takes away from unit performance. In the 75th Ranger Regiment, officers are accepted for a position only after successfully executing that position’s duties in a previous unit. The need for this unit to quickly develop a capability not resident in the Army today means that it should have a similar policy.
The unit would also need compulsory release authority. Lessons from experiments like the Network Integration Evaluation and different battle lab experiments show that some soldiers thrive with new weapons, technology, and multiple feeds of information; others do not.
Study group. The complexities of megacities and the dilemma of military operations within them have been studied by the Army since 2013. Operations in urban terrain more broadly have been studied multiple times before that. Wargames, conferences, writing contests, tabletop discussions, and experiments have been conducted. But not much has actually been done with the fruits of these efforts. For a megacity unit to constantly adapt based on ongoing refinements of our understanding of the domain, it needs a small, diverse group of permanently assigned experts committed to studying, learning, capturing lessons, and developing doctrine for megacities.

* * *
One can only speculate about where the Army might be engaged next. But in all likelihood, given global trends in urbanization, the Army can count on being asked to conduct military operations in a megacity. When (not if) this happens, it is going to be ugly and costly. When we’ve faced other difficult domains and environments in the past, the Army hasn’t been afraid to adapt to meet them. We need to do the same now by committing one of our thirty-one BCTs to prepare for this mission.
 __________________________________________________
FYI Maj. John Spencer is a scholar with the Modern War Institute at the United States Military Academy in West Point, NY. A former Ranger Instructor, he has held the ranks of private to sergeant first class and lieutenant to major while serving in ranger, airborne, light, and mechanized infantry units during his 23 years as an infantryman.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Sunday, August 25, 2019

EXPOSED!! Justice John Roberts was on Epstein Flight in 2011. Another reason this weak man is totally Compromised. Remove him from the Supreme Court.

 

WHY ISN'T ANYBODY SERIOUSLY INVESTIGATING THIS ?

TruNews reported that one of the names that showed up in the flight logs of Mr. Epstein’s plane was a “John Roberts.”

The timing of the Flight bring my suspicious mind to ask the question .. Hmm.. was this the reason why Roberts switched his vote on Obamacare?  
Was this another "Insurance Policy"? 

The Supreme Court chief justice as you will read was blackmailed before according to wikileaks.. see the article below!  

Yes there is another well-known man by the name John Roberts. The FOX News chief White House correspondent had this to say on Twitter:

“To anyone who thinks this might be me, I did not know Epstein, never met him, and certainly never flew on any of his aircraft.”

But there is a John Roberts on a flight February 2011. According to the logbook entry, “John Roberts” flew February 10, 2011, on a Gulfstream II jet from Palm Beach, Florida, to Teterboro Airport just outside New York City. 

We know it was not the Lolita Express...  but all attempts by TruNews and others to determine its actual ownership have been thwarted. Hell The FAA has made the registration history for the aircraft secret. WHY ? WHAT ARE THEY HIDING!


I told you in my earlier blogs that John Roberts is gay and his sham marriage and child adoption were part of the cover to make him eligible as " Chief Justice of the Supreme Court" 

The Leftist Cabal including the New York Times and Soros and the Obama Gang knew all this and they held it in abeyance to use at the right time.

From 2016....

THEY BLACKMAILED JUSTICE ROBERTS IN MORE WAYS THAT ONE ! THEY WERE PLANNING TO DO IT AGAIN ACCORDING TO WIKI LEAKS.  This is proof positive of that!




Clinton Operatives Brag They “Scared Off” Chief Justice Roberts with blackmail and threats with regards to Obamacare!



In one of the more remarkable Wikileaks exchanges, Clinton operatives Neera Tanden and Jennifer Palmieri took credit for “scaring off” Chief Justice John Roberts by threatening to make the Supreme Court’s decision in the first Obamacare case, NFIB v. Sebelius, a campaign issue. These are the players on the email thread:

Center for American Progress (CAP): a left-wing activist organization that was an arm of the Obama administration and now is an arm of the Clinton campaign.
Neera Tanden: President of CAP.

John Podesta: Former President of CAP, now Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.
Jennifer Palmieri: Former White House Communications Director for Barack Obama, now communications director for the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Jake Sullivan: Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff when she was Secretary of State, now foreign policy adviser to the Clinton campaign.

In the main email in the thread, Neera Tanden harkens back to the first Obamacare case, decided on a 5-4 vote in 2012, and says that she believes the White House was able to “scared off” Chief Justice John Roberts by politicizing the case and using blackmail as well. 

She suggests that the Clinton campaign should do the same with regard to the then-pending second Obamacare case, King v. Burwell. She identifies Justices Roberts and Anthony Kennedy as most vulnerable to political pressure:

"I mentioned this to John some time back, but think it’s a bit more current now."
It is most likely that this decision has already been made by the Court, but on the off chance that history is repeating itself, then it’s possible they are still deciding (last time, seems like Roberts went from striking the mandate to supporting it in the weeks before. If that sounds familiar look no further than James Come of the FBI who contorted like a pretzel to exonerate Hillary Clinton. Then when all else fails look what happened to Justice Scalia. HE WAS MURDERED).
As Jennifer will remember, it was pretty critical that the President threw the gauntlet down last time on the Court, warning them in the first case that it would politicize and use blackmail too if the court and Justice Roberts in particular ruled against the ACA.

This is how thugs who call themselves Democrats act. This is how progressives and Hillary would threaten the Supreme Court and the Conservatives who sit on it, if the Court rules against the government. It’s not that you wish that happens. But that would be the necessary consequence of a negative decision…the Court itself would become a hugely important political issue. Hillary will appoint A KANGAROO Court. AMERICA will be over as a Republic with the final nail in the coffin of the rule of LAW.

At CAP Action, we can get that story started. But kinda rests on you guys to make it stick.
What do you think? If you want to proceed, we should move soon.
Tanden then added this in a separate email:

And to clarify, the candidate wouldn’t have to do anything. I think we could move the story with just a nod from the campaign on the strategy.

Note how CAP seamlessly coordinates with the Clinton campaign, taking directions on whether to “move the story” from campaign officials. Tanden makes no pretense of independence.
Jake Sullivan responded that he is “into it,” but would “defer to Jen on this one.” Palmieri gave the green light:

She has already been making this an issue. Not sure how in depth you are suggesting but seems like this should be manageable.



Posted by at 4 comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)