WHY ISN'T ANYBODY SERIOUSLY INVESTIGATING THIS ?
TruNews reported that one of the names that showed up in the flight
logs of Mr. Epstein’s plane was a “John Roberts.”
The timing of the Flight bring my suspicious mind to ask the question .. Hmm.. was this the reason why Roberts switched his vote on Obamacare?
Was this another "Insurance Policy"?
The Supreme Court chief
justice as you will read was blackmailed before according to wikileaks.. see the article below!
Yes there is another well-known man by the name John Roberts.
The FOX News chief White House correspondent had this to say on
Twitter:
“To anyone who thinks this might be me, I did not know Epstein, never met him, and certainly never flew on any of his aircraft.”
But there is a John Roberts on a flight February 2011. According to the logbook entry, “John Roberts” flew February 10, 2011, on a Gulfstream II jet from Palm Beach, Florida, to Teterboro Airport just outside New York City.
We know it was not the Lolita Express... but all attempts by TruNews and others to determine its actual ownership have been thwarted. Hell The FAA has made the registration history for the aircraft secret. WHY ? WHAT ARE THEY HIDING!
I
told you in my earlier blogs that John Roberts is gay and his sham
marriage and child adoption were part of the cover to make him eligible
as " Chief Justice of the Supreme Court"
The
Leftist Cabal including the New York Times and Soros and the Obama Gang
knew all this and they held it in abeyance to use at the right time.
From 2016....
THEY
BLACKMAILED JUSTICE ROBERTS IN MORE WAYS THAT ONE ! THEY WERE PLANNING
TO DO IT AGAIN ACCORDING TO WIKI LEAKS. This is proof positive of that!
In one of the more remarkable Wikileaks exchanges, Clinton operatives Neera Tanden and Jennifer Palmieri took credit for “scaring off” Chief Justice John Roberts by threatening to make the Supreme Court’s decision in the first Obamacare case, NFIB v. Sebelius, a campaign issue. These are the players on the email thread:
Center for American Progress (CAP): a left-wing activist organization that was an arm of the Obama administration and now is an arm of the Clinton campaign.
Neera Tanden: President of CAP.
John Podesta: Former President of CAP, now Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.
Jennifer Palmieri: Former White House Communications Director for Barack Obama, now communications director for the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Jake Sullivan: Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff when she was Secretary of State, now foreign policy adviser to the Clinton campaign.
In the main email in the thread, Neera Tanden harkens back to the first Obamacare case, decided on a 5-4 vote in 2012, and says that she believes the White House was able to “scared off” Chief Justice John Roberts by politicizing the case and using blackmail as well.
She suggests that the Clinton campaign should do the same with regard to the then-pending second Obamacare case, King v. Burwell. She identifies Justices Roberts and Anthony Kennedy as most vulnerable to political pressure:
"I mentioned this to John some time back, but think it’s a bit more current now."
It is most likely that this decision has already been made by the Court, but on the off chance that history is repeating itself, then it’s possible they are still deciding (last time, seems like Roberts went from striking the mandate to supporting it in the weeks before. If that sounds familiar look no further than James Come of the FBI who contorted like a pretzel to exonerate Hillary Clinton. Then when all else fails look what happened to Justice Scalia. HE WAS MURDERED).
As Jennifer will remember, it was pretty critical that the President threw the gauntlet down last time on the Court, warning them in the first case that it would politicize and use blackmail too if the court and Justice Roberts in particular ruled against the ACA.
This is how thugs who call themselves Democrats act. This is how progressives and Hillary would threaten the Supreme Court and the Conservatives who sit on it, if the Court rules against the government. It’s not that you wish that happens. But that would be the necessary consequence of a negative decision…the Court itself would become a hugely important political issue. Hillary will appoint A KANGAROO Court. AMERICA will be over as a Republic with the final nail in the coffin of the rule of LAW.
At CAP Action, we can get that story started. But kinda rests on you guys to make it stick.
What do you think? If you want to proceed, we should move soon.
Tanden then added this in a separate email:
And to clarify, the candidate wouldn’t have to do anything. I think we could move the story with just a nod from the campaign on the strategy.
Note how CAP seamlessly coordinates with the Clinton campaign, taking directions on whether to “move the story” from campaign officials. Tanden makes no pretense of independence.
Jake Sullivan responded that he is “into it,” but would “defer to Jen on this one.” Palmieri gave the green light:
She has already been making this an issue. Not sure how in depth you are suggesting but seems like this should be manageable.
