How to remove a Activist Federal Judge!

 (y) How To Remove a Federal Judge (y)

Donald J. Trump should get his team to look at this...



Most everyone assumes that impeachment is the only means of removing federal judges and that the Constitution's grant of good-behavior tenure is an implicit reference to impeachment. This Article challenges that conventional wisdom. Using evidence from England, the colonies, and the revolutionary state constitutions, the Article demonstrates that at the Founding, good-behavior tenure and impeachment had only the most tenuous of relationships. Good-behavior tenure was forfeitable upon a judicial finding of misbehavior. There would have to be a trial, the hearing of witnesses, and the introduction of evidence, with misbehavior proved by the party seeking to oust the tenured individual. Contrary to what many might suppose, judges were not the only ones who could be granted good-behavior tenure. Anything that might be held--land, licenses, employment, etc.--could be granted during good behavior, and private parties could grant good-behavior tenure to other private individuals. Impeachment, by contrast, referred to a criminal procedure conducted in the legislature that could lead to an array of criminal sanctions. In England and in the colonies, impeachment was never seen as a means of judging whether someone with good-behavior tenure had forfeited her tenure by reason of misbehavior. Whether a landholder, employee, or government officer with good-behavior tenure had misbehaved would be determined in the ordinary courts of law. Moreover, the vast majority of state constitutions did not equate good-behavior tenure with impeachment either. To the contrary, many distinguished them explicitly. Taken together, these propositions devastate the conventional conflation of good-behavior tenure with impeachment. More importantly, they indicate that the original Constitution did not render impeachment the only possible means of removing federal judges with good-behavior tenure. Given the long tradition of adjudicating misbehavior in the ordinary courts, Congress may enact necessary and proper legislation permitting the removal of federal judges upon a finding of misbehavior in the ordinary courts of law.

READ MORE HERE.. EXCELLENT ARTICLE!! WRITTEN BY YALE SCHOLARS!!

http://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/how-to-remove-a-federal-judge

The Judges’ obligation is to obey the Constitution

Precedent or The Constitution - which is higher?SO STOP THE KANGAROO COURTS FILLED WITH KANGAROO JUDGES PERVERTING THE CONSTITUTION!

 

 

The Judges’ obligation is to obey the Constitution – not other federal judges. Precedent is FINE when it’s correct. But when it’s incorrect, it should be overturned.

 

Now let me see if I can briefly explain Precedent. It is a very valuable tool for lawyers and their clients. Say you come to me with a civil dispute and you are thinking of asking me to file a lawsuit for you. And you ask me, “do I have a good case?” Well, the only way I can advise you on whether you have a good case is by seeing how courts have ruled in other cases similar to yours. So I am able to predict pretty well how they are likely to rule in your case. This is REALLY important to you because you don’t want to file a lawsuit unless we are pretty sure you will win. So in most of the civil disputes people have (torts, negligence cases, breach of contract, defamation, construction defects, etc.) the lawyers LIVE & DIE BY PRECEDENT.

 

The same goes for criminal cases. If you are being prosecuted for possession of this or that, my FIRST inquiry is, “was the search legal”? So I read the cases – the precedent – to see how the Courts have ruled in search & seizure cases like yours. This is extremely valuable information for us – and it guides us in deciding whether your best bet is to fight it or whether I should seek a good deal (with the prosecution) for you.

 

Now – you will note that I have been talking about litigation (civil or criminal) which affects individual people in their personal lives.

 

What about “constitutional issues”? 

 

The Supreme Court has perverted Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. Those opinions where they used Section 1 to overturn state statutes criminalizing abortion and sodomy – and legalizing homosexual “marriage” – are absurd & silly and are usurpations of powers not delegated to the federal courts. Any Judge who honors his Oath [which is to obey the Constitution, not other judges] would see that the decisions in those cases need to be overturned. These are issues reserved by the States or The People. THEY are the ones who decide how their State will handle these issues.

 

So the correct answer is: I will honor my Oath to obey the Constitution. When the precedent is right, I will follow it. But when there is a conflict between precedent and the Constitution, I will decide in favor of the Constitution.

SO STOP THE KANGAROO COURTS FILLED WITH KANGAROO JUDGES PERVERTING THE CONSTITUTION!

GOD'S HAND IN AMERICA: THE AMAZING MIRACLE OF DONALD TRUMP AND SQUANTO!

IS THIS A CONCIDENCE?
Once you read these two stories you will at least wonder if God touches America in time of need.

❤️❤️❤️❤️💫

So was it a Coincidences or Providence..
YOU TELL ME!
 
Please take the time to read this
Read and then Share!

Ya'll know the story of how the Pilgrims arrived at our shores on the Mayflower—and how a friendly Patuxet native named Squanto showed them how to plant corn, using fish as fertilizer—is well-known. His story is astonishing, even raising profound questions about God’s role in American history.

Every Thanksgiving we remember that, to escape religious persecution, the Pilgrims sailed to the New World, landing at Plymouth Rock in 1620. But numerous trading ships had visited the area earlier. Around 1608 an English ship dropped anchor off the coast of what is today Plymouth, Mass., ostensibly to trade metal goods for the natives’ beads and pelts. The friendly Patuxets received the crew but soon discovered their dark intentions. A number of the braves were brutally captured, taken to Spain and sold into slavery.

One of them, a young man named Tisquantum, or Squanto, was bought by a group of Catholic friars, who evidently treated him well and freed him, even allowing him to dream of somehow returning to the New World, an almost unimaginable thought at the time. Around 1612, Squanto made his way to London, where he stayed with a man named John Slany and learned his ways and language. In 1618, a ship was found, and in return for serving as an interpreter, Squanto would be given one-way passage back to the New World.
After spending a winter in Newfoundland, the ship made its way down the coast of Maine and Cape Cod, where Squanto at last reached his own shore. After 10 years, Squanto returned to the village where he had been born. But when he arrived, to his unfathomable disappointment, there was no one to greet him. What had happened?

It seems that since he had been away, nearly every member of the Patuxets had perished from disease, perhaps smallpox, brought by European ships. Had Squanto not been kidnapped, he would almost surely have died. But perhaps he didn’t feel lucky to have been spared. Surely, he must have wondered how his extraordinary efforts could amount to this. At first he wandered to another Wampanoag tribe, but they weren’t his people. He was a man without a family or tribe, and eventually lived alone in the woods.

But his story didn’t end there. In the bleak November of 1620, the Mayflower passengers, unable to navigate south to the warmer land of Virginia, decided to settle at Plymouth, the very spot where Squanto had grown up. They had come in search of religious freedom, hoping to found a colony based on Christian principles.
Their journey was very difficult, and their celebrated landing on the frigid shores of Plymouth proved even more so. Forced to sleep in miserably wet and cold conditions, many of them fell gravely ill. Half of them died during that terrible winter. One can imagine how they must have wept and wondered how the God they trusted and followed could lead them to this agonizing pass. They seriously considered returning to Europe.

But one day during that spring of 1621, a Wampanoag walked out of the woods to greet them. Somehow he spoke perfect English. In fact, he had lived in London more recently than they had. And if that weren’t strange enough, he had grown up on the exact land where they had settled.

Because of this, he knew everything about how to survive there; not only how to plant corn and squash, but how to find fish and lobsters and eels and much else. The lone Patuxet survivor had nowhere to go, so the Pilgrims adopted him as one of their own and he lived with them on the land of his childhood.

No one disputes that Squanto’s advent among the Pilgrims changed everything, making it possible for them to stay and thrive. Squanto even helped broker a peace with the local tribes, one that lasted 50 years, a staggering accomplishment considering the troubles settlers would face later.

So the question is: Can all of this have been sheer happenstance, as most versions of the story would have us believe? The Pilgrims hardly thought so. To them, Squanto was a living answer to their tearful prayers, an outrageous miracle of God. Plymouth Colony Governor William Bradford declared in his journal that Squanto “became a special instrument sent of God” who didn’t leave them “till he died.”

Indeed, when Squanto died from a mysterious disease in 1622, Bradford wrote that he wanted “the Governor to pray for him, that he might go to the Englishmen’s God in heaven.” And Squanto bequeathed his possessions to the Pilgrims “as remembrances of his love.”


These are historical facts. 


NOW Take another Miracle that happened in 2016:
For over 20 years America had been spiraling downward into a cesspool of Corruption and Evil and was on the verge of being taken over by a Socialist Oligarchy hell bent on FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORMING AMERICA! 

The forces of Evil had been steadily stealing the Country. The Courts, The schools, the Media, the Entertainment Industry, the Political power. All of it had been usurped. Hussein Obama had started the Fundamental transformation of America. He was to pass the baton on to Hillary Clinton. They used every tool at their disposal to ensure the outcome. the Courts, The Media, The Money the Trojan horses the FBI, The IRS THE DOJ and others.
She was assured a win, The DOJ, The FBI, THE IRS, DHS all had been corrupted to assure that Hillary had a clear path to Victory.
That would be the End of the Republic. She would choose 2 -3 Supreme Court Justices who would rip up the Constitution and America as the Founders had made it would all but vanish.
The Promise of a New Country encapsulated in the story of Squanto being on the shore to make sure the Pilgrims on the Mayflower would survive, would have been dashed. AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT WOULD HAVE ENDED!

But the Almighty works miracles when we so need them.
He delivered to us a Brave, Bold, Brash, imperfect Man in DONALD TRUMP who believed in the PROMISE of America and what it stood for and AGAINST ALL ODDS, WON THE PRESIDENCY and re-pointed America in the right direction again. He was loud and proud and kept his promises and is working to RESTORE AMERICA.

WAS THIS IS THE SECOND MIRACLE PATRIOTS?
LET US THANK GOD AND RAISE OUR BATTLE FLAG AND JOIN THE FIGHT AND LET US NOT LET A MIRACLE GO TO WASTE.

Your thoughts? Agree then share and let your neighbors know that GOD is on our side!

MAKE SURE YOU VOTE IN THE MID TERMS OF 2018 AND SAVE THE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY IN CONGRESS...

GOD HAS WORKED THUS FAR ON OUR BEHALF...  IT IS UP TO YOU TO DO THE REST.. AND BRING IT HOME AND SAVE AMERICA