EYE FOR AN EYE.... ANJEM CHOWDRY.. YOU BETTER HIDE!. SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!

THE MUSLIMS CALL THEIR CALL FOR MURDER AND MAYHEM.. "FATWAS".. I WOULD NOT LOWER MYSELF TO USE THEIR LANGUAGE!  

WE CALL FOR A DEATH SENTENCE FOR ANJEM CHOWDRY ...TO BE CARRIED OUT BY WHO EVER CAN CLOSE ENOUGH TO HIM.  WE FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE...

Here is what he said on the Hannity Show this week...

This is a rush transcript from "Hannity," January 7, 2015. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: At least 12 people are dead following a horrific terror attack against a satirical newspaper in Paris, France.  Now, the attack, carried out by heavily armed hooded gunmen, appears to have been in reaction to that paper's depiction of the Muslim Prophet Mohammed. And radical London imam, a guy by the name of Imam Choudary, Anjem Choudary, took to Twitter after the slaughter, tweeting, quote, "Freedom of expression does not extend to insulting the prophets of Allah, whatever your views on the events in Paris today are. #Parisshooting." He also tweeted, ''Muslims love the messenger Mohammed more than their parents, children, even themselves. Why don't people understand?''

Here now to explain his comments is-- London imam Anjem Choudary is with us. You sound like you basically support what happened today.

ANJEM CHOUDARY, LONDON IMAM: No, what I'm saying is that these things need to be put into context. We're talking about a French government who have banned the (INAUDIBLE) they refuse Muslims to build mosques now in Paris.  They are engaged in an occupation of Muslim land and even killing Muslims now in Syria and Iraq. And on top of that-- they insult the profit

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: You're making-- you're justifying this. They went in and slaughtered a newspaper, a satirical newspaper that makes fun of the pope and makes fun of Catholics and all religions and politicians and everybody.  But you do have in France many no-go zones, where non-Muslims are not allowed to go, and police and fire departments are not allowed to go. And you do have sharia courts in those areas. So your characterization is not exactly accurate about the treatment of Muslims in France.

CHOUDARY: Well, I think that the political landscape in Europe has, in fact, shifted. As you know, many right-wing organizations are now to-- are now allowed to espouse their own anti-Islamic, you know, ideas very openly.  And in fact, we could have a government in places like France which are very anti-Islam and anti-Muslims.

HANNITY: Yeah. So what you're basically saying-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: So what you're basically saying is freedom of expression does not extend to insulting the prophets of Allah, whatever your views on what happened in Paris. So you're saying you do not believe in freedom of speech. You don't believe in freedom of religion. You don't believe in freedom of expression. You believe in Islamic fascism, that people must abide by your laws!

CHOUDARY: Actually, as a Muslim, we believe sovereignty and supremacy belongs to God. And therefore, we believe in submitting to the commands of God--

HANNITY: Well, you're demanding-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: But you're not-- no, you're demanding everybody else submit to what you believe--

CHOUDARY: No. No, what we say-- 

HANNITY: --and it should be-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: Well, that's what you said. You said freedom of expression-- 

CHOUDARY: What we say is that-- 

HANNITY: Go ahead.

CHOUDARY: Well, what we say is that freedom of expression has a responsibility by those people who espouse it in the West, in particular non-Muslims. But as you know, it is, you know, changed. It is curtailed for things like incitement of hatred. And as you know, you have laws which allow, you know, the curtailment of freedom of expression for your own national security.

HANNITY: So you're saying that-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: I get what you're saying. You're saying anything offensive about the Prophet Mohammed should be illegal, and you believe that should be worldwide. Every country should adopt that law.

CHOUDARY: Well, you know, you need to understand that in Islam, this carries capital punishment. We saw before with Theo Van Gogh-- 

HANNITY: Right.

CHOUDARY: --and Salman Rushdie-- 

HANNITY: But you're not answering. You're saying that every country-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: --people should be aware about this already. 

HANNITY: But every country should adopt that, and it's convert or die.  It's either you agree with us or we will go into your newspaper-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: --and we will slaughter you. We will put a fatwa out on you.

CHOUDARY: No. What we're saying-- what we're saying is that, you know, a quarter of the world's population revere the messenger Mohammed (INAUDIBLE) and you know, for them, they'll prefer to die themselves than to allow anyone to insult the prophet.

Now, people in the West should understand that. We live in a very unstable and insecure world today, which you can see very well now in Paris--

HANNITY: OK-- 

CHOUDARY: --what the consequences of insulting the prophet are -- 

HANNITY: Let me ask you a question-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: And all we're saying is that the sensibilities and the emotions of Muslims must be taken into consideration in the context in which we live today.

HANNITY: Let me-- let me ask you quick questions and get answers. And I'm really holding my temper down because you really anger me and I know you anger a lot of our audience. But I think this is important. You want worldwide a law to be in every country that you cannot criticize the prophet. Is that accurate?

CHOUDARY: Well, we want the sharia, and the sharia says that-- 

HANNITY: In every country.

CHOUDARY: --this is completely prohibited.

HANNITY: OK. And to you-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: And to you, this-- I want short answers. To you, this is the true Islam. This is-- this is Islam.

CHOUDARY: Well, of course.

HANNITY: No criticizing the prophet.

CHOUDARY: Of course.

HANNITY: OK. And those that are apostates that once were Muslim but convert to, say, Christianity, you believe that those people should die, right?

CHOUDARY: Well, I believe that-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: --proven in a sharia court they are found guilty of apostating (ph), then there does-- this-- there does-- 

HANNITY: OK, so apostates should-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: The penalty for apostacism is death, in your view. You're agreeing.

CHOUDARY: This is correct, yes.

HANNITY: And infidels, non-Muslims, they should die, as well, right?  They-- they must abide-- 

CHOUDARY: No, nobody said that. Nobody said that.

HANNITY: But the Quran says-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: --take neither Christians nor Jews for your friends. The Quran says that.

CHOUDARY: The Christians and Jews can live side by side with the Muslims, as they did in the heart of Europe for over 800 years in Andalusia.

HANNITY: OK-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: --need to be killed.

HANNITY: What about jihad against infidels? And holy war?

CHOUDARY: Well, jihad is either to defend the life and property of Muslims, which is called jihad (INAUDIBLE) defensive jihad, or it is to remove the obstacles in the way-- 

HANNITY: Next question-- 

CHOUDARY: --of (INAUDIBLE) the sharia, outside of the frontiers of the Islamic state.

HANNITY: Let's talk about rights of women under sharia, which you said you want worldwide. Should every woman-- should they be mandated worldwide that they must cover themselves?

CHOUDARY: Well, we believe that either you abide by the criteria which is set out by God-- 

HANNITY: So the answer is yes.

CHOUDARY: --of how much you should cover your own body, or you know, that people will decide for themselves-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: We're running out of time.

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: I want people to know what you think true Islam is.

CHOUDARY: --should be determined by divine law.

HANNITY: OK, short answers.

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: These are yes or no questions. So women should cover, yes, right?

CHOUDARY: Of course.

HANNITY: OK. All women-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: Men and women should cover.

HANNITY: All right, no bikinis for anybody. No bikinis for anybody--

CHOUDARY: This is what we believe.

HANNITY: OK, I got it. All right. Adultery-- 

CHOUDARY: You know, what they do in their home is one thing, but not in the public arena.

HANNITY: Not in the public. Got it. Adulterers, women that commit adultery, you're OK with them being stoned to death?

CHOUDARY: Men and women who commit adultery for which there is sufficient evidence-- for example, four eyewitnesses who saw the actual-- 

HANNITY: But that's only for-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: That's only for men. That's only for women.

CHOUDARY: --be tried in a court-- no, it's for both men and women.

HANNITY: So adultery-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: The penalty for adultery should be death.

CHOUDARY: For both men and the women who-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: And what about gays and lesbians? Should they be killed, as well?

CHOUDARY: Well, if someone likes someone of the same gender, it's one thing. But if they are committing the-- you know, the-- the act of sodomy- -

HANNITY: If they're having sex.

CHOUDARY: --and are witnesses-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: They should die. OK-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: And you're OK with comics and satirists and critics of Islam-- for example, if somebody questions the age of Mohammed's wife, that they should be, what-- the penalty for them should be death, as well?

CHOUDARY: No, I mean, you can ask about the age of the wives of the prophet. You can criticize Islam in that you can have a debate and discussion. But there's a difference between insulting the honor of the messenger Mohammed-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: For example what this particular magazine did was portray him naked.

HANNITY: And you-- 

CHOUDARY: And they-- they-- they-- you know, they-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: And that's too bad. And you know what? You're going to have to get over it. There was a-- I'm a Catholic, and there was a picture-- an artist in the Brooklyn museum, elephant dung on the Virgin Mary. I didn't like it, but I didn't go in and shoot the people in the museum.

CHOUDARY: Yes, but that's your way of life, so-- 

HANNITY: Hang on!

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: But you're saying this is-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: I'm running out of time. You're saying this is true Islam, and you're also-- on the other hand, you say this is a peaceful religion. How is it peaceful if you believe-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: --all these people that you disagree with?

CHOUDARY: No, Islam does not mean peace, Sean, it means submission, submission to the commands of God.

HANNITY: OK, so you want worldwide-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: --peacefully with me, then we can live peacefully together. We can live peacefully together, but-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: If we submit to your will and we're your slave, then yeah-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

CHOUDARY: --as your own CIA admit, that's not peace-- 

HANNITY: So you want Islamofascism!

CHOUDARY: When you talk about Muslims, obviously, they will react (INAUDIBLE) 

HANNITY: Yeah, so you basically want Islamofascism. You want to control everybody. Everybody-- 

CHOUDARY: No, we want sharia.

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: I'm not disagreeing with you. I just want to make sure. You don't call it that, but ostensibly, when you take away everybody's freedom of choice and demand that they think like you do and practice the way you do, you have taken away all freedom of thought. All right, last question--

CHOUDARY: But we're not calling for that, though, are we, Sean. I mean, you can become, you know, a Muslim if you wish. You can remain a Christian or a Jew. You can live under the sharia. This is what we're saying.  We're talking about-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: --convert of die.

CHOUDARY: --the occupation of Muslim land.

HANNITY: Convert or die, basically.

CHOUDARY: What?

HANNITY: Convert or--

CHOUDARY: No. No. They can convert to Islam or they can live (INAUDIBLE) which is the non-Muslim living under the sharia, and-- 

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: --under sharia, if you have to follow your laws or die.

(CROSSTALK) 

HANNITY: The law of the land in America--

HANNITY: Listen-- 

CHOUDARY: You want people to abide by the law in America. So under the sharia, you will abide by sharia law.

HANNITY: All right. Anjem Choudary, I still think you're an evil SOB.

General James Mattis For Commander In Chief 2015

THIS IS GENERAL JAMES MATTIS.. AN AMERICAN WARRIOR.. AN AMERICAN HERO. 

 

 

This was sent to me by a Marine: ( did not want his name posted!! )

"I was a Corpsman in Iraq in 04 I flew in Fallujha on a CASEVAC, I flew on a Marine who was wounded. As, those Marines brought that wounded onto our bird, I had a hand on my should, i didn't pay attention. He said "You take care of my Marine" I looked up and saw his stars and his name tape Mattis. General Mattis on my bird, under fire, taking care of our Marines. I looked at him and said "Your Marine is with the best Corpsman in the Navy." I love Mattis, he will always be a hero to me and our Marines we fought with."
Semper Fi Brother
I will post it to honor you both!!

Friends... Voting in "ANOTHER POLITICIAN" HOWEVER SINCERE CANNOT RESOLVE THE DEEP UNDERLYING ISSUES! WE NEED A CATHARTIC RESTORATION OF THE COUNTRY AND ITS CONSTITUTION..
WE NEED AN INTERIM COMMANDER IN CHIEF!! THAT COULD BE GENERAL JAMES MATTIS.

WHY COMMANDER IN CHIEF AND NOT PRESIDENT YOU MIGHT ASK??

Because until we clean the political cesspool we do not need another Politician. We need a Commander who can make decisions without bowing to the progressive bureaucracies that are embedded with anti America Leftist, Pan African Anarchists, and Progressives.
We must restore the Constitution and it cannot be done without an interim time where a PATRIOTIC AMERICAN WITH THE STRONG BACKING OF THE MILITARY CAN HOLD AMERICA TOGETHER AND SET THE SHIP RIGHT..

So Many Sincere and earnest Patriots talk about all kinds of ways... short of "Revolution" to Restore our Republic.
Things like the "States Convention" the "Countermand Convention" "Impeachment" etc etc...
All of these are "Intellectual Pipe Dreams" ... the Cabal is so firmly entrenched that the process will be sabotaged and will NEVER EVER COME TO FRUITION...
THE ONLY WE WAY TAKE BACK THE COUNTRY THIS LATE IN THE GAME IS REVOLUTION... IN SOME FORM OR ANOTHER!
No election of a Conservative Senate, Congress or President or Governors or Legislatures ...... is going to resolve the decayed underpinnings of the Constitutional Republic our country once was.
It needs a whole lot more work before a "President" can do any meaningful work.
FACT:
The Bureaucracy and the Federal Judiciary is loaded with leftist Progressives and Socialists and unless and until we remove all of them through a Radical Bloodless/bloody Revolt.. all we will do is spend the next 30 years fighting against people with legal authority to enforce the mandate created by these crooks and ideologues over the past 90 years ...who have diametrically opposite views of what America should be than we do..
FACT:
WE CANNOT CO-EXIST WITH IDEOLOGIES THAT ARE POLAR OPPOSITES TO OURS. NOTICE AS SOON AS THEY LOSE THEY TALK ABOUT US WORKING WITH THEM. WHEN THEY HAVE THE POWER THEY DO WHAT THE HELL THEY WANT.
Electing a Conservative Senate, Congress or President or Governors or Legislatures whose hands are tied by Federal Judges and by Bureaucracies like the EPA, THE IRS, THE HHS etc that are also loaded with enemies of the Constitutional Republic is a WASTE OF TIME...and energy UNTIL we have completed the catharsis first.
Thats a fact !! ONLY A REVOLUTION CLEANS THE SYSTEM. AN APOLITICAL GENERAL WHO TILL NOW HAS SHOWN NO LONG TERM POLITICAL ASPIRATIONS AND HAS SHOWN LOVE OF COUNTRY IS WHAT WE NEED.
DON'T YOU AGREE??
HELP US SHARE THE HELL OUT OF THIS POST
SO... MILLIONS SEE THAT THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE!!

 

 

From Legendary Marine General James Mattis

Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis is a legend in the military. Revered by Marines and non-Marines alike, Mattis has taken on the persona of a modern-day Patton — having the knowledge and insight to lead his Marines through combat, while standing behind them and taking the heat if things go bad. In short, Mattis is a hell of a leader.
In 2013 while serving as commander of Central Command in Tampa, Fla., Mattis retired after four decades of service. Since then, he’s been teaching at Stanford and Dartmouth, as well as speaking across the country on leadership. He’s also working on a book with author Bing West.
We looked back at some of the best insights he offered, through a great collection of quotes. Most apply strictly to military service, but some can be just as useful in the corporate boardroom.

“You cannot allow any of your people to avoid the brutal facts. If they start living in a dream world, it’s going to be bad.”

The “dream world” Mattis is talking about is one of denial and complacency — a mood in combat that can get you killed. And in corporate America, it can get you wiped out by the competition.

“If in order to kill the enemy you have to kill an innocent, don’t take the shot. Don’t create more enemies than you take out by some immoral act.”

Mattis, who co-wrote the manual for Counterinsurgency with Gen. David Petraeus, knows well that troops cannot win over the population to their side if they are killing the wrong people. His advice here to soldiers and Marines is spot on.

“I don’t lose any sleep at night over the potential for failure. I cannot even spell the word.”

Of course he can spell it but that’s not the point. Mattis wants to impress upon his troops that failure should not be an option.

“Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.”

Before his Marines deployed to Iraq in 2003, he told them this (along with many other great pieces of advice in a now-famous letter). His point here is to be a professional warfighter who can be polite with civilians, but always remember that if things go south, the dirty work needs to get done.

“The first time you blow someone away is not an insignificant event. That said, there are some sh–heads in the world that just need to be shot. There are hunters and there are victims. By your discipline, you will decide if you are a hunter or a victim.”

Recalling the mentality of the wolf, the sheep, and the sheepdog, Mattis understands that there is evil in the world. It’s important for his men to be prepared for whether they will be the hunter or the victim if they ever face it.

“There are some people who think you have to hate them in order to shoot them. I don’t think you do. It’s just business.”

One of his more controversial quotes, to be sure. But in Mattis’ view, to be a professional, you need to have a professional mindset. It’s not really necessary to get emotional about what you have to do. It just needs to get done.

“You can overcome wrong technology. Your people have the initiative, they see the problem, no big deal … you can’t overcome bad culture. You’ve gotta change whoever is in charge.”

In a talk at Stanford, Mattis was relating how toxic culture can bring down an organization that has everything else right. The culture of an organization comes from the top, and if that part is screwed up, there are going to be problems.

“The most important six inches on the battlefield is between your ears.”

Mattis doesn’t want robots just mindlessly following his orders. As a leader, he gives broad guidance and lets his men use their own brains to decide how it gets accomplished.

“Find the enemy that wants to end this experiment (in American democracy) and kill every one of them until they’re so sick of the killing that they leave us and our freedoms intact.”

Amen.

“In this age, I don’t care how tactically or operationally brilliant you are, if you cannot create harmony — even vicious harmony — on the battlefield based on trust across service lines, across coalition and national lines, and across civilian/military lines, you need to go home, because your leadership is obsolete. We have got to have officers who can create harmony across all those lines.”

Mattis implores his officers to not get stuck in their own little boxes. Learning how to be brilliant on the battlefield is important, but it’s more important to be able to work with others to get the job done.

“PowerPoint makes us stupid.”

Military officers endure (and have to create) tons of PowerPoint briefings to inform their chain of command what’s going on. Mattis however, is not one of those officers. He actually banned PowerPoint since he saw it as a waste of time.

“You are part of the world’s most feared and trusted force. Engage your brain before you engage your weapon.”

Mattis wants his Marines to always be thinking before they take the shot. It’s advice that has no doubt saved lives.

“An untrained or uneducated Marine … deployed to the combat zone is a bigger threat to mission accomplishment … than the enemy.”

The biggest detriment to mission accomplishment is not from the competition, but from within. Having the right mindset and skills is what results in getting results.

“No war is over until the enemy says it’s over. We may think it over, we may declare it over, but in fact, the enemy gets a vote.”

Combat doesn’t happen in a vacuum. All the planning, meetings, and briefings on what potentially can happen in a given situation are good, but the bad guys will always react in uncertain ways. The key is to be prepared for anything.

“Be the hunter, not the hunted: Never allow your unit to be caught with its guard down.”

Just because you are at the top of your game doesn’t mean someone won’t come along to knock you down. Units (and individuals) need to be vigilant and make sure that doesn’t happen.

“Ultimately, a real understanding of history means that we face NOTHING new under the sun.”

Mattis is an avid reader. On all his deployments, the general brought along a ton of books that he thought may help him along the way. In an email that went viral (via Business Insider) on the importance of reading, Mattis wrote that it “doesn’t give me all the answers, but it lights what is often a dark path ahead.”

“You’ve been told that you’re broken. That you’re damaged goods … there is also Post-Traumatic Growth. You come back from war stronger and more sure of who you are.”

While giving a speech to veterans in San Francisco, Mattis tried to dispel the mindset that those leaving the service should be pitied. Instead, he told them, use your experiences as a positive that teaches you to be a better person.

Obama Declares War On "Extremism" – So...Are You An "Extremist"? If you are Conservative.. bet you are!!

TIME FOR A REVOLUTION:
CATHOLICS & CHRISTIANS ON SAME LIST AS THE KKK AND HAMAS! CHECK OUT THE LIST!!
Best one.. "ISLAMOPHOBES" ARE TERRORISTS ACCORDING TO OBAMA!!

 

Do you know what an “extremist” is?  In the wake of the horrible terror attacks on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in France, Barack Obama is speaking very boldly about the need to win the war against “extremists”, and he has announced plans to host a major global summit on “extremism” next month.  And on the surface that sounds great.  But precisely how are we supposed to determine whether someone is an “extremist” or not?  What criteria should we use?
As you will see below, your definition of an “extremist” may be far, far different from the definition that Barack Obama is using.  When you do a Google search, you will find that an “extremist” is defined as “a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.”  According to Wikipedia, “extremism” is “an ideology (particularly in politics or religion), considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of a society or to violate common moral standards.  Extremism can take many forms, including political, religious and economic.”  Please notice that neither of those definitions uses the word violence.  In this day and age, you can be considered an “extremist” simply based on what you believe, and as you will see later in this article there are now tens of millions of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” according to official U.S. government documents.
When you use the word “extremist”, you may have in your mind a picture of ISIS fighters or the terrorists from the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
But for elitists such as Barack Obama, the word “extremist” has a much broader meaning.  In recent years, it has become a code word for those that do not have an “enlightened” view of the world.  If your views on politics, religion or social issues are extremely different from the liberal, progressive views of “the mainstream” (as defined by the mainstream media and by “mainstream” politicians such as Barack Obama), then they consider you to be an extremist.
Early in the presidency of George W. Bush, we were told that Islamic terrorists were the enemy.  And so most of the country got behind the idea of the War on Terrorism.  But over the years that has morphed into a War on Extremism.  In fact, the Obama administration has gone so far as to remove almost all references to Islam from government terror training materials…

Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole confirmed on Wednesday that the Obama administration was pulling back all training materials used for the law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive.

“I recently directed all components of the Department of Justice to re-evaluate their training efforts in a range of areas, from community outreach to national security,” Cole told a panel at the George Washington University law school.

Now, much of the focus in law enforcement training materials is on “domestic extremists”.  We are being told that “domestic extremism” is just as great a threat to our national security as terror groups overseas are.
But exactly who are these “domestic extremists”?
Well, the truth is that you may be one of them.
I want to share with you a list that I have shared in a couple of previous articles.  It is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” or “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.  This list will really give you a good idea of what Barack Obama means when he uses the word “extremist”.  Each of these 72 items is linked, so if you would like to go see the original source document for yourself, just click on the link.  As you can see, this list potentially includes most of the country…

PLEASE CLICK ON EACH LINK FOR DOCUMENTATION!
1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. “Anti-Gay”
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Rightwing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians
Do you fit into any of those categories?
Personally, I fit into a couple dozen of them.
That is why alarm bells should go off whenever Barack Obama speaks of the need to crack down on “extremism”.
If Barack Obama wants to denounce Islamic terror, he should do so.  But because of his extreme political correctness, he goes out of his way to avoid any connection between Islam and terror.  Instead, he speaks of the need to recognize “Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings” and he insists that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
Meanwhile, our liberties and freedoms are being eroded a little bit more with each passing day.  In the name of fighting “terrorism” or “extremism”, our government is constructing a Big Brother police state control grid all around us.  I like the way that Ron Paul described what is happening to us just the other day…

If Americans were honest with themselves they would acknowledge that the Republic is no more. We now live in a police state. If we do not recognize and resist this development, freedom and prosperity for all Americans will continue to deteriorate. All liberties in America today are under siege.

It didn’t happen overnight. It took many years of neglect for our liberties to be given away so casually for a promise of security from the politicians. The tragic part is that the more security was promised — physical and economic — the less liberty was protected.

With cradle-to-grave welfare protecting all citizens from any mistakes and a perpetual global war on terrorism, which a majority of Americans were convinced was absolutely necessary for our survival, our security and prosperity has been sacrificed.

It was all based on lies and ignorance. Many came to believe that their best interests were served by giving up a little freedom now and then to gain a better life.

The trap was set. At the beginning of a cycle that systematically undermines liberty with delusions of easy prosperity, the change may actually seem to be beneficial to a few. But to me that’s like excusing embezzlement as a road to leisure and wealth — eventually payment and punishment always come due. One cannot escape the fact that a society’s wealth cannot be sustained or increased without work and productive effort. Yes, some criminal elements can benefit for a while, but reality always sets in.

Reality is now setting in for America and for that matter for most of the world. The piper will get his due even if “the children” have to suffer. The deception of promising “success” has lasted for quite a while. It was accomplished by ever-increasing taxes, deficits, borrowing, and printing press money. In the meantime the policing powers of the federal government were systematically and significantly expanded. No one cared much, as there seemed to be enough “gravy” for the rich, the poor, the politicians, and the bureaucrats.

The country that our forefathers founded is dying.
Now, individuals and organizations that attempt to restore the values that our founders once believed in so strongly are regarded as dangerous “extremists” that need to be watched carefully.
Sadly, most Americans don’t even realize what is happening to this nation.  As long as they are fed a constant diet of mindless entertainment, most Americans are perfectly content to let “the experts” do their thinking for them.
We are steamrolling toward oblivion, and most of the country is dead asleep.
So is there any hope for us?