Has anyone heard if the Government is circulating a new variation of this 1994 questionnaire to military ??
Read the questions first circulated during the Clinton Leftward NWO MOVE... Would the Sons and Daughters of Americans do this ??
U.S. Armed Forces Survey:
This is the questionnaire that was
given in 1994 to select groups of U.S. armed forces personnel.
Notice the references to the U.N., the firing on American civilians
and the correlations of the
two aforementioned. Note questions 8‑17 deal with the use of U.S.
federal armed forces intervening
in the civilian affairs of the U.S. public under the pretense of
policemen. According to the U.S. Constitution (posse comitatus
law) No federal forces are to be
used in the civil control of the populace. Also note question 46 for a
stunning question
concerning the use of federal forces.
Note questions 18‑45 deals entirely with the United Nations, which
is really the heart of this
survey. Questions 1‑7 are only lead in questions for the rest of the
survey.
Results to the article (paper file) is "Incredible" - The following is all taken in order: Combat Arms Survey:
This questionnaire is to gather data concerning the attitudes of
combat trained personnel with regards to non‑traditional
missions. All of your responses are
confidential. Write your answers directly on the questionnaire form. In
part II, place an "X" in
the space provided for your response.
Part I. Demographics:
1: What service are you in?
2: What is your pay grade? (e.g. E‑7, O‑7)
3: What is your MOS code and description?
4: What is your highest level of education in years?
5: How many months did you serve in Operation Desert Storm/Desert Shield?
6: How many months did you serve in Somalia?
7: What state or country did you primarily reside in during childhood?
Part II. Attitudes: Do
you feel that U.S. combat troops should be
used within the United States for any of the following
missions?
8: Drug enforcement?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
9: Disaster relief? (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
10: Security at national events? (e.g. Olympic Games, Super Bowl)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
11: Environmental disaster clean‑up?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
12: Substitute teachers in public schools?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
13: Community assistance
programs? (e.g. landscaping, environmental cleanup, road repair, animal
control)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
14: Federal and State prison guards?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
15: National emergency police force?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
16: Advisors to S.W.A.T.
units, the F.B.I., or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
(B.A.T.F.)?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
17: Border patrol? (e.g. prevention of illegal aliens into U.S. territory)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
Do you fell that U.S.
combat troops under U.S. command should be used in other countries for
any of the following United Nations
missions?
18: Drug enforcement?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
19: Disaster relief? (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
20: Environmental disaster clean‑up?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
21: Peace keeping?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
22: Nation building? (Reconstruct civil government,
develop public school systems, develops or
improve public transportation system..etc.)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
23: Humanitarian relief? (e.g. food, and medical
supplies, temporary housing, and clothing)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
Do you feel that U.S. combat troops should be used in other
countries, under the command of non‑U.S.
officers appointed by the United Nations for any of the
following missions?
24: Drug enforcement?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
25: Disaster relief? (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
26: Environmental disaster clean‑up?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
27: Peace keeping?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
28: Nation building? (Reconstruct civil government, develop public
school systems, develops or
improve public transportation system..etc.)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
29: Humanitarian relief? (e.g. food, and medical supplies, temporary
housing, and clothing)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
30: Police Action? (e.g. Korea, Vietnam, but serving under non‑U.S. officers)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
Consider the following statements:
31: The U.S. runs a
field training exercise. U.N. combat troops should be allowed to serve
in U.S. combat units during these exercises,
under U.S. command and control?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
32: The United Nations runs a field training exercise. U.S. combat
troops under U.S./U.N. command and control
should serve in U.N. combat units during these
exercises?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
33: The United Nations runs a field training exercise. U.S. combat
troops should serve under
U.N. command and control during these exercises?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
34: U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions as long as
the U.S. has full command
and control?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
35: U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions under United Nations command and control?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
36: U.S. combat troops
should be commanded by U.N. officers and non‑commissioned officers
(NCO's) at battalion and company levels while performing
U.N. missions?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
37: It would make no
difference to me to have U.N. soldiers as members of my team? (e.g.
fire team, squad, platoon)
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
38: It would make no difference to me to take orders from a U.N. company
commander?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
39: I feel the President of the United States has the authority
to pass his responsibilities as
Commander‑in‑Chief to the U.N. Secretary General?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
40: I feel there is no conflict between my
oath of office and serving as a U.N. soldier?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
41: I feel my unit's combat effectiveness would not be affected by
performing humanitarian
missions for the United Nations?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
42: I feel a designated unit of U.S. combat soldiers should be
permanently assigned to the command and control
of the United Nations?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
43: I would be willing to volunteer for assignment to a U.S. combat unit under a U.N. command?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
44: I would like U.N.
member countries, including the U.S., to give the U.N. all the soldiers
necessary to maintain world peace?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
45: I would swear to the
following code: "I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in
the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's
way of life. I am prepared to give my
life in their defense."
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
46: The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale,
transportation, and transfer
of all non‑sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is
permitted for these firearms
to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this
period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their
firearms. Consider the following
statement: I would fire on U.S. citizens who refuse or resist
confiscation of firearms banned
by the U.S. government?
(___) (___) (___)
(___) (___)
Strongly agree Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree No Opinion
End of questionnaire
Now ask yourself these questions:
1: Are we to turn over our armed forces to the U.N.?
2: Can we be the U.N.'s world policeman?
3: Or the world's policeman on our own?
4: Should we give oath of allegiance to a foreign power?
5: Should we compromise our U.S. Constitution in the name of world government?
6: Who is first, the
United States or the rest of the world, specifically the United
Nations?
7: Would you rather answer
to a world court (United Nations court) or to the courts of the
United States?
8: Do you believe you will have any say
in a world government or world court (United Nations)?
9: Are you willing to sacrifice national sovereignty for world laws and courts?
10: Is the United Nations better able to dictate our lives to us than we as a country are?
11: DO YOU BELIEVE IN A NEW WORLD ORDER RUN BY THE UNITED NATIONS?
Think about it, that is what this survey was meant to
convey, A New World Order Run By the
United Nations!
Here are the results of the survey:
Shoot Americans (New
World Order Survey of Last Year) Survey Results One In Four Marines
would fire! Results are in
from the U.S. military "shoot Americans" survey ‑ and they are
disquieting By Mike Blair. About one in
four U.S. Marines would be willing to fire upon American
citizens in a government gun confiscation program, according
to the results of a survey
undertaken nearly a year ago at a Marine Corps Base in Southern
California. In addition, more than
four out of five of the Marines surveyed indicated they would
be willing to "participate in missions under a U.S. National
Emergency Police Force."
The SPOTLIGHT has been provided the results of the survey contained
in a master degree thesis,
reportedly undertaken by a student at the Naval Postgraduate School at
Monterey California, to determine "unit
cohesion" when soldiers are assigned to "non‑traditional
missions." Few stories published in the SPOTLIGHT
have created such a stir when it was revealed
in this newspaper's July 25,1994 issue that the survey had been taken
at the Marine base. On May
10,1994, the survey was undertaken by Navy Lt. Cmdr. Ernest G.
Cunningham, purportedly as research for
his thesis: "Peacekeeping and U.N. Operational control; A
Study of their effect on Unit Cohesion,” at the Marine
base, located on the South‑east corner of
the Mojave Desert, about 70 miles due east of San Bernadino,
California, just east of
Los Angeles
Received Degree: Cunningham turned in the thesis for printing on
March 20 and was graduated from
the post Graduate school on March 23, receiving his Master of
Science in Manpower, Personnel and Training Analysis degree.
According to U.S. Navy and Marine
Corps officials, Cunningham administrated the survey to 300 Marine
veterans of the Persian
Gulf War and the earlier invasion of Panama in the base auditorium.
He had the cooperation and permission of the base's
public affairs officer, but Cunningham did
not have consent of the base commander, Brig. Gen. Russell H. Sutton.
In fact, Sutton did not
know about the survey until afterwards. The results of the survey have
until now been "classified,"
according to a Marine Corps spokesman. The survey contained 46
questions dealing with the Marines' willingness to perform
"non‑traditional" missions. Question
46, dealing with a gun confiscation scenario, jolted both the Marines
and Navy, as well as The
Department of Defense, numerous members of the House and Senate and
virtually every American concerned
with the second amendment to the U.S. constitution, which
grantees the people's right to "keep and bear arms."
Very Disturbing: This is
how the question was posed to the Marines: "The U.S. Government
declares a ban on the possession,
sale, transportation, and transfer of all non‑sporting
firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these
firearms to be turned over to
the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen
groups refuse to turn over
their firearms. "Consider the following statement:'I would fire upon
U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation
of firearms banned by the U.S. government'." The
question was then posed as to what degree the individual Marine agreed
with the statement.
According to results given in Cunningham's thesis, a total of 88
percent, or 264 Marines, responded to
the question. Of the 264 who responded, 26.34 percent, or 79
Marines indicated they would be willing to fire upon U.S. citizens."
Of that total, 18.67
percent or 56 Marines, indicated they "agree" with the statement, and
7.67 percent or 23 Marines,
indicated that "strongly agree." A total of 61.66 percent, or 185,
indicated that they were opposed to firing on
citizens.
Of that total, 42.33 percent, or 127 indicated they "strongly
disagree" and 19.33 percent or 58,
indicated they "disagree." In is thesis, Cunningham noted:
"This particular question, unlike the others, elicited
from 15.97 percent of the respondents with
an opinion, either heavier pen or pencil marks on the response or
written comments in the
margin space. The responses to this scenario suggest that a complete
unit breakdown could occur in a unit tasked to
execute this mission."
In other words, if a commander asked the men of his unit to raise
their hands in a simple
poll, he could determine the position of such servicemen and those who
responded in the affirmative could be tasked for such
a mission. This is just one of the reasons
the question, not to mention the fact that it was allowed to be asked,
is obviously potentially
dangerous. In fact, several months before the survey was taken at
Twenty‑Nine Palms, the SPOTLIGHT, MODERN
GUN and other publications revealed the question posed
by Cunningham in his survey had ben asked of members of a U.S. Seal
(Sea‑Air‑land) team. In
addition, despite Navy and Marine Corps denials, there have been dozens
of reports, unconfirmed,
that the survey has been given to other servicemen, as well as various
law enforcement agents.
Further Surveys? In fact,
Cunningham notes: "If the results of this survey elicit concerns in
the areas queried, then further studies are warranted.
Perhaps a random sample survey should be
conducted to determine whether the results of this survey is valid for
the entire Marine Corps
and/or Army. Also, a survey could provide an indication of the
volunteer pool that would seek service in units
dedicated to, and specialized in, peacekeeping
operations...Also of concern is the fact, as reported by Cunningham in
his thesis that 97.67
percent of the Marines responded to a question‑‑an overwhelming 85.33
percent in the affirmative‑‑that
they would be willing to participate in missions under a U.S.
National Emergency Police Force..." "Furthermore,"
Cunningham notes "43.0 percent of the soldiers
strongly agreed..."Federal Troops have been restricted from
participation with local
police authorities to quell domestic violence since the passage of the
Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. That being
the case, it was surprising that these soldiers seemed
not to know the legal restrictions placed on them by this act."
He also noted, however, that "In
May 1992, 4,000 U.S. Army and Marine Soldiers were ordered by President
George Bush to augment
city and county law enforcement and state National Guard during the
riot in Los Angeles, California following the
Rodney King trial. "Since, 1981," Cunningham
states, "the majority of today's All Volunteer Force has been
exposed to and participated in an
environment of expanding non‑traditional missions when Congress passed
the Military
Cooperation with
Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies Act of 1981. This act enabled the
Military to participate in the drug war. This cooperative
alliance of military and civilian
police efforts in the name of national security may have eroded the
demarcation between
civilian law enforcement and our military institution first established
by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878."
The results of another
question, No. 45, posed by the survey indicates American soldiers are
not eager to swear allegiance to
the United Nations, although nearly one in four would do so.
Question 45 states: "I would swear to the following code:'I
am a United Nations fighting person. I
serve in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way
of life. I am prepared to
give my life in their defense'." A total of 69.33 percent, or 208
Marines surveyed, indicated they disagreed,
with 117, or 39 percent, indicating they strongly
disagreed.
On the other hand, 71 Marines, or 23.66 percent, indicated
they would be willing to swear such
allegiance to the UN, with 19, or 6.33 percent, indicating they were
strongly in favor of doing
so. "For thousands of years." Cunningham notes in his thesis, "military
organizations have required
their soldiers to swear to some kind of code or allegiance. A code
provides a standard for the soldiers to live up to and,
in many cases, to die for. A code can be a
powerful tool for establishing and sustaining unit cohesion. But what
if the mission a solider is
assigned to perform counters or confuses the code he has sworn to
uphold? Question 45 was presented to determine
if the solders would swear to such a code." No one
knows if the American personnel traveling in the helicopter shot down
over Iraq [by "friendly
fire"] in April 1994 would have sworn allegiance to such a code.
Yet, Vice President
Albert Gore stated that these Americans "died in the service of The
United Nations." "It is patently clear,"
a retired high ranking Army Officer told The
SPOTLIGHT,"that this survey raises some very serious issues, not the
least of which is that U.S.
servicemen are not being properly educated as to the limits of their
service in the civilian sector.
This is most dangerous, and, I should think the Congress has an
obligation to the people to take a careful look at this, not
to mention the people at the
Pentagon."From:
http://thenewalexandrialibrary.com/armysurvey.html
