The bullshit being spewed now to cover for Obama is that...Hillary is the one to blame for Benghazi!! THE REAL TRAITOR IS OBAMA!
The story being hidden is that Obama and the Cabal did not do anything
about the attack BECAUSE...... it would blow the lid off the "Other"
story.....
The "Other" story which is more potent than the current story and is being hidden is that The Obama
Cabal was running guns through Libya to Syria Rebels. Ambassador Stevens was part
of the plan.
Early in Leon Panneta's testimony they created a
road block by him lying under oath that Obama was briefed at 5 pm and he went to bed.
WATCH THE VIDEO HERE....
WHAT A LIAR!!
PANETTA & DEMPSEY
TAKING PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY
TO THE NEXT LEVEL
http://youtu.be/P4enyBcNFNs
Then without even asking about anything he just mosied off went off to a fund
raiser in Vegas....
YEAH RIGHT !!! My sources tell me that he
was on top of the story and was part of covering it up... helped with the " Video Story".... but needed "Plausible Deniability" and so their
official story is that he just went to bed.
NOW EVERYONE INCLUDING THE CONSERVATIVE MEDIA IS JUST PARROTING THAT LINE... that "Obama did not know anything about anything cuz he went to bed."
Look they strategised that going to bed was a better story than Gun Running to Syrian Rebels....
WAKE UP... EXPOSE THE REAL STORY !!!Sources confirm U.S. gun-running to jihadists
Center of Benghazi scandal still ignored by media!
PETRAEUS WAS SET UP
SO HE COULD NOT TESTIFY !!!
We must track the story as to why Panneta was so vehement about Obama
ONLY have one meeting at 5 pm and then did nothing. That is insanity
even for a Kenyan. Just curiosity would dictate that he would at least
want to know what the heck is going on!!!
Unless it was a cover
up. " You go hide Mr. President... we cannot have you exposed to the
stuff... so we will fall on the sword..if the coverup fails"
Thats how it went down !! GUARANTEED !!
WND has reconfirmed with multiple knowledgeable Middle Eastern
security sources that the U.S. special mission in Benghazi was used to
coordinate Arab arms shipments and other aid to the so-called rebels
fighting in Libya and later in Syria.
WND first broke the story on the Benghazi gun-running issue just 13 days after the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks.
The scandal has garnered more news media attention since Sen. Rand
Paul asked outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about the claims
during hearings over the Benghazi affair two weeks ago.
Clinton claimed she did not know whether the U.S. special mission was involved in gun-running.
Paul asked Clinton: “Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of
weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring
weapons to Turkey out of Libya?
“To Turkey?” Clinton asked. “I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.”
Continued Paul: “It’s been in news reports that ships have been
leaving from Libya and that may have weapons, and what I’d like to know
is the annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring,
buying, selling, obtaining weapons, and were any of these weapons being
transferred to other countries, any countries, Turkey included?”
Clinton replied, “Well, senator, you’ll have to direct that question
to the agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is
available.”
“You’re saying you don’t know?” asked Paul.
“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”
That section of the exchange with Paul was almost entirely ignored by
media, which instead focused on the Republican senator’s earlier
statement that if he were president he would have relieved Clinton of
her post.
Reconfirmed
Now knowledgeable security sources have reconfirmed WND’s original
reporting on the use of the Benghazi mission in aiding the rebels who
are known to be saturated by al-Qaida and other Islamic terrorist
groups.
In September,
WND broke the story
that the slain U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a central
role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria,
according to Egyptian security officials.
In November, Middle Eastern security sources further described both
the U.S. mission and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi as the main
intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels that was
being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Among the tasks performed inside the building was collaborating with
countries, most notably Turkey, on the recruitment of fighters –
including jihadists – to target Assad’s regime, the security officials
said.
While the White House has been largely mum on the alleged use of the
Benghazi mission to aid the rebels, Obama administration officials did
claim the White House rejected a plan to supply arms to the Syrian
rebels.
If, indeed, President Obama rejected the arms plan, as reported last
weekend by the New York Times, it would mean the White House went
against the recommendations of outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta;
Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton; and then-CIA Director David Petraeus.
The plan was said to have been generated by Petraeus and Clinton.
In Senate hearings on Benghazi last week, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.,
asked Panetta and Dempsey whether they had supported a plan “that we
provide weapons to the resistance in Syria.”
“We do,” Panetta replied.
“You did support that?” McCain asked again.
“We did,” added Dempsey, who was sitting next to Panetta.
Neither Dempsey nor Panetta elaborated on their positions.
The New York Times reported the White House rebuffed the
Clinton-Petraeus plan developed last summer to arm and train Syrian
rebels.
The Times, citing unnamed Obama administration officials, reported
the White House rejected the Clinton-Petraeus proposal over concerns it
could draw the U.S. into the Syrian conflict and the arms could fall
into the wrong hands.
The plan reportedly called for vetting rebels and arming a group of fighters with the assistance of Arab countries.
WND reported Stevens himself was leading the vetting efforts, working
with the Saudis to send names of potential jihadi recruits to U.S.
security organizations for review. Names found to be directly involved
in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq and Afghanistan,
were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria.
The scheme appears to mirror the Petraeus-Clinton plan as described by the New York Times.
Secret activities
According to
the 39-page report released last month
by independent investigators probing the attacks at the diplomatic
facility, the U.S. mission in Benghazi was set up without the knowledge
of the new Libyan government,
as WND reported.
“Another key driver behind the weak security platform in Benghazi was
the decision to treat Benghazi as a temporary, residential facility,
not officially notified to the host government, even though it was also a
full-time office facility,” the report states. “This resulted in the
Special Mission compound being excepted from office facility standards
and accountability under the Secure Embassy Construction and
Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (SECCA) and the Overseas Security Policy
Board (OSPB).”
The report, based on a probe led by former U.S. diplomat Thomas Pickering, calls the facility a “Special U.S. Mission.”
During the Libyan revolution against Moammar Gadhafi’s regime, the U.S. admitted to directly arming the rebel groups.
Stevens himself first arrived in Libya on a cargo ship to serve as
the official U.S. liaison to Libyan opposition, reportedly working
directly with Abdelhakim Belhadj of the al-Qaida-tied Libyan Islamic
Fighting Group.
At the time of the U.S. aid to the Libyan fighters, rebel leader
Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi acknowledged in an interview that a significant
number of the Libyan rebels were al-Qaida fighters, many of whom had
fought U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He insisted his fighters “are patriots and good Muslims, not
terrorists,” but he added that the “members of al-Qaida are also good
Muslims and are fighting against the invader.”
Consulate?
From the beginning, U.S. media reports on the events in Benghazi have been misleading.
The vast majority of media coverage worldwide refers to the U.S.
facility that was attacked as a “consulate,” even though the government
itself has been careful to call it a “mission.”
A consulate typically refers to the building that houses a consul,
who is the official representative of the government of one state in the
territory of another. The U.S. consul in Libya, Jenny Cordell, works
out of the embassy in Tripoli.
Consulates at times function as junior embassies, providing services related to visas, passports and citizen information.
On Aug. 26, about two weeks before his was killed, Ambassador Stevens
attended a ceremony marking the opening of consular services at the
Tripoli embassy.
The main role of a consulate is to foster trade with the host and
care for its own citizens who are traveling or living in the host
nation.
Diplomatic missions, on the other hand, maintain a more generalized
role. A diplomatic mission is simply a group of people from one state or
an international inter-governmental organization present in another
state to represent matters of the sending state or organization in the
receiving state.
However, according to the State Department investigation, the
building was a “U.S. Special Mission” set up without the knowledge of
the Libyan government.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/sources-confirm-u-s-gun-running-to-jihadists/
Posted on Thursday, November 01, 2012 8:00:54 PM by Katechon
It is becoming increasingly clear that the Obama régime has been
running guns and armaments and munitions to the Muslim Brotherhood and
its affiliate jihadist groups, including
heat-seeking
shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles designed to shoot down
jetliners. The American Mission in Libya was apparently trying to buy
back man-portable anti-aircraft missiles that the Obama Régime sold or
gave to the Muslim Brotherhood and then went "
missing." The Administration was also trying to buy back weapons previously owned by the
Gaddafi Régime that
spread everywhere after the "revolution."
Peter Bouckaert,
Human Rights Watch
emergencies director, told CNN he has seen the same pattern in armories
looted elsewhere in Libya, noting that "in every city we arrive, the
first thing to disappear are the
surface-to-air missiles." He said such missiles can fetch many thousands of dollars on the black market. "We are talking about some
20,000 surface-to-air missiles in all of Libya,
and I've seen cars packed with them." he said. [...] The United States
has spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to buy them back [...]
“The rebels came from all over the western mountains, and
they just took what they wanted,” said Riyad, a supervisor of the ruined arsenal’s small contingent of rebel guards.
A
report by the UN Support Mission in Libya (PDF) said that Gaddafi had accumulated a
large stockpile of MANPADs, and that although thousands were "destroyed" during the 2011 military intervention in Libya, there were "
increasing
concerns over the looting and likely proliferation of these portable
defence systems, as well as munitions and mines, highlighting the
potential risk to local and regional stability." As soon as islamic organizations outside Libya realized that there were
Manpads available, they tried to get them.
When the Obama Régime discovered that thousands of MANPADs had "
disappeared" and were "
on the loose in Libya" it turned around and stuck a LOT of cash in the CIA "annex", or "
safehouse" in order to BUY those weapons back. (I wrote about the CIA annex
here.)
Fox News Bureau Chief of Intelligence
Catherine Herridge
said that the role being played by the U.S. Mission in Libya is to
control the movement of weapons out of Libya to Syrian rebels fighting
to bring down the Bashar Al-Assad régime. The Benghazi mission played a
key role in “engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists
who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East,” said
the president of the
Center for Security Policy.
From there, we can infer that Ghadaffi was overthrown in order to use
Libya as the doorway to get the arms in for distribution to Syria,
Yemen, Jordan, Egypt and eventually Saudi Arabia. Especially Syria, for
now.
That's the big picture.
The State Department and the
CIA were somehow, some way running or heavily involved in this armament
pipeline. But what was Stevens' function inside this apparatus? What do
we know about it? I suggest that we use this thread to aggregate facts,
data and sources in order to help answering that question.
Only
when we will get to see more clearly what role Stevens played in the
running of this armament pipeline (to the incipient Caliphate) will we
begin to learn "
Why the Obama régime wanted him dead?," or at least:
a) Why was the security protection for the Benghazi Mission prior to the 9/11 anniversary attack
stripped?, and
b) Why did the Obama régime refuse to send (or even permit) local help on the night of the attack.
How did Ambassador Stevens help in the gun and armament running?
We
know that Benghazi was staffed by CIA operatives, working for the State
Department, whose job was a) to secure and destroy dangerous weapons
(like RPGs and SAMs) looted from Gaddafi’s stockpiles during and after
the 2011 revolution, and b) to facilitate the onward shipment of those
weapons to Syria.
Was Ambassador Stevens' job to cover for all of this?
We know that Obama signed an
intelligence finding in early 2012 authorizing U.S. support for the Syrian rebels, and that this summer
CIA operatives
were on the Turkish-Syrian border helping to steer weapons deliveries
to selected Syrian rebel groups, most of them “hard-line Islamic
jihadists.”
One of those jihadis was Abdelhakim Belhadj.
Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military
Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, "met
with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with
Turkey," said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. "Mustafa
Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there. -- Ruth Sherlock in Tripoli, 27 Nov 2011, for the Telegraph
Belhadj’s contact with the Syrian Free Army was part of a Lybian
delegation to Turkey offering arms and fighters to the Turkish-backed
Syrian jihadis.
The Daily Telegraph
on Saturday [November 26 2011] revealed that the new Libyan authorities
had offered money and weapons to the growing insurgency against Bashar
al-Assad. Mr Belhaj also discussed sending Libyan fighters to train
troops, the source said. Having ousted one dictator, triumphant young
men, still filled with revolutionary fervour, are keen to topple the
next. The commanders of armed gangs still roaming Tripoli's streets said
yesterday that "hundreds" of fighters wanted to wage war against the
Assad regime.
So we have the United-States, Libya and Turkey working together with
and through Al-Qaeda-linked jihadists like Belhadj to get weapons into
the hands of Syrian rebels, known to be dominated by Al-Qaeda and the
Muslim Brotherhood.
We know also that a
Libyan-flagged vessel, Al-Entisar, docked at the Turkish port of Iskanderun on September 6, 2012.
A mysterious Libyan ship [the Libyan-flagged vessel Al Entisar, which
means "The Victory,"] -- reportedly carrying weapons and bound for
Syrian rebels -- [...] was received in the Turkish port of Iskenderun --
35 miles from the Syrian border -- on Sept. 6 [...] On the night of
Sept. 11, [Ambassador] Stevens met with the Turkish Consul General Ali
Sait Akin, and escorted him out of the consulate front gate one hour
before the assault began at approximately 9:35 p.m. local time.
[A]
source told Fox News that Stevens was in Benghazi to negotiate a
weapons transfer, an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of
Libya-based extremists.
[...] According to an initial Sept. 14
report by the Times of London, Al Entisar was carrying 400 tons of
cargo. Some of it was humanitarian, but also reportedly weapons,
described by the report as the largest consignment of weapons headed for
Syria's rebels on the frontlines.
"This is the Libyan ship ...
which is basically carrying weapons that are found in Libya," said Walid
Phares, a Fox News Middle East and terrorism analyst. [...]
The
cargo reportedly included surface-to-air anti-aircraft missiles, RPG's
and Russian-designed shoulder-launched missiles known as MANPADS.
The
ship's Libyan captain told the Times of London that "I can only talk
about the medicine and humanitarian aid" for the Syrian rebels. It was
reported there was a fight about the weapons and who got what "between
the free Syrian Army and the Muslim Brotherhood."
"The point is
that both of these weapons systems are extremely accurate and very
simple to use," Fox News military analyst Col. David Hunt explained. He
said the passage of weapons from Libya to Syria would escalate the
conflict. "With a short amount of instruction, you've got somebody
capable of taking down any, any aircraft. Anywhere in the world."
[...]
In March 2011, the Reuters news service first reported that President
Obama had authorized a "secret order ... (allowing) covert U.S.
government support for rebel forces" to push the Libyan dictator Muammar
Qaddafi from office.
At a hearing on March 31, before the House
Foreign Affairs Committee, several lawmakers raised concerns about the
finding reported by the Reuters news service and whether the Obama
administration knew who constituted the rebel forces and whether
Islamists were among their ranks.
"What assurances do we have
that they will not pose a threat to the United States if they succeed in
toppling Qaddafi?" Republican Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla.,
asked. "There are reports that some opposition figures have links to Al
Qaeda and extremist groups that have fought against our forces in Iraq."
[...] A month after the October 2011 death of Qaddafi, Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton announced in Tripoli that the U.S. was
committing $40 million to help Libya "secure and recover its weapons
stockpiles." [...]
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/25/was-syrian-weapons-shipment-factor-in-ambassadors-benghazi-visit/
The group accused of moving the weapons is the Foundation for Human Rights, and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH).
U.S.
Ambassador Chris Stevens’ last meeting in Benghazi the night he was
killed was with the Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, who is
reported to have been there to discuss a weapons transfer or a warning
about the possible compromise of the Libyan weapons pipeline to Syria.
Whatever the topic of Ambassador Stevens’ discussion with Akin, he
clearly and knowingly put himself in harm’s way to be there, in
Benghazi, on the night of September 11.
PLEASE READ AND SHARE !!! OBAMA KNEW ... LETS NOT LET HIM GET AWAY SAYING HE WENT TO BED NOT KNOWING!!!
