OBAMA SHREDS THE CONSTITUTION EVERYDAY..
No president has the power to violate constitutional restraints of power,”
“The Constitution is the rule of law, and it is the job of Good Patriots in Government to uphold the rule of law.”
THIS BUNCH OF POLITICIANS ARE MONEY GRUBBING SELF SERVING OPPORTUNISTS IN WASHINGTON. WE MUST READ AND BE EDUCATED IN OUR SYSTEM.
American
political institutions presuppose certain convictions about human
nature, the worth and prerogatives of persons, the meaning of life, the
distinction between right and wrong, and the destiny of the individual.
The Colonists came to their understanding of these matters as heirs of
the intellectual and religious heritage of Christendom—the culture whose
shaping forces sprang from ancient Israel, Greece, and Rome.
Given
the consensus of two centuries ago—which regarded man as a sovereign
person under God—it was only logical to structure government so as to
expand opportunities for the exercise of personal freedom. The
Constitution is clearly designed to maximize each individual’s equal
right to pursue his own peaceful goals and enjoy the benefits and
responsibilities of ownership.
The
Declaration of Independence put into words what nearly everyone was
thinking, that personal rights and immunities are ours because we are
created beings, that is, we manifest a major purpose and intent of this
universe. This implies a firm rejection of the alternative, which is to
assume that we are the mere end products of natural and social forces,
adrift in a meaningless cosmos. For if the universe is meaningless, then
no way of life is any more meaningful than any other; in which case
Power has no limits.
Our forebears had firm convictions about the purpose of life, and knew that in order to achieve life’s transcendent
end Power must be limited: "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God,"
they declared. If life is viewed in these terms, how shall we conceive
the proper scope and competence of government? What is its role in
society? What functions should we assign to it?
Government
is the power structure of a society. This is the first and most
important fact about the political agency, that it has the legal
authority to coerce. The second thing is to inquire whether the power
wielded by government is self-sprung, or delegated by a more
comprehensive authority than the merely political. Does government rule
autonomously or by divine right; or is the real power located elsewhere
and merely loaned to government? The Constitution is clear on this
point; the power is in the people to lay down the laws which Power must
obey. They set it up; they tell it what to do.
"We,
the People of the United States," reads the Preamble, "do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Specific Limitations
The
people empower an agency to do certain things for them as a nation, but
if we isolate the provisions they laid down to limit government the
prevailing intent or consensus which made the Constitution its political
tool becomes clearer.
The
powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,
or to the people. Amendment X.
The people, furthermore, possess a body of rights by native endowment above and beyond those mentioned in the Constitution.
The
enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment IX
These sovereign people shall be free to worship, speak, and publish freely.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom . . . of the press. Amendment I
Voluntary association is the corollary of individual liberty, and this is emphasized, as well as the right of petition.
Congress shall make no law . . . abridging . . . the right of the people peaceably to assemble. Amendment I
Congress
shall make no law abridging . . . the right of the people . . . to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Amendment I
The old world divisions of mankind into castes and orders of rank are to be no more.
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States. Article I, 9
Every
citizen shall have a right to participate in the processes by which the
nation is governed; and, should he desire to run for public office he
shall not be put to a creedal test.
The right of the citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged. . . . Amendments XV and XIX
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. Article VI
Freedom to Trade; No Special Privilege
Commerce makes for a free and prosperous people, so restraints on trade shall be removed.
No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any State. . . . Article!, 9
No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one State over those of another. Article I, 9
Progressive
taxation violates the principle of equal treatment under the
law—penalizes ability, and lowers productivity, so it is forbidden.
No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census. . . . Article I, 9
The public treasury shall be inviolate; government shall not confer economic privilege on some at the expense of others.
No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law. Article I, 9
Personal privacy shall be respected and jealously guarded.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects . . . shall not be violated.
Amendment IV
Conflict
is a built-in feature of human action, and when collisions of interest
do occur in society, the rights of the individual must be maintained.
No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. Amendment V
Nor shall private property be taken for
public use without just compensation. Amendment V
Strings on the Military
In
some nations, the civilian life is a mere appendage to the military.
This will not happen here because civilians control the purse strings.
No appropriation of money (to raise and support military and naval forces) shall be for a longer term than two years. Article I, 8
As
a further safeguard against any future militarization of this nation,
the civilian sector must have the means for defending itself.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment II
In
some countries, criminal proceedings are used to entrap citizens, whose
guilt is assumed; the burden of proof is on them to show their
innocence. Here, the innocence of the accused is assumed, until his
guilt is proved. The law shall not reach backward to designate as
criminal an action which until then was innocent.
No … ex post facto law shall be passed. Article I, 9
There shall be no Star Chamber proceedings.
No
person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury. Amendment V
Protecting the Accused
The accused is protected against illegal imprisonment, and must be informed of the charges against him.
The privilege of the write of habeas corpus shall not be suspended.
Article I, 9
Punishment shall fit the crime; it shall not mean extinction of civil rights, forfeiture of property, or penalties against kin.
No bill of attainder . . . shall be passed. Article I, 9
The accused is entitled to be tried by his peers. . . . the right of trial by jury shall be preserved. Amendment VII
There is to be no – forced self-incrimination.
Nor shall [he] be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. Amendment V
The rights of the accused are summarized:
1. . . . a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury;
2. Within the district wherein the crime shall have been committed;
3. . . . to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;
4. . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him;
5. . . . to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor;
6. . . . and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Amendment VI
Even when found guilty, the accused is protected.
1. Excessive bail shall not be required;
2. Nor excessive fines imposed;
3. Nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment VIII
Treason
Treason is a crime against the nation, so serious that it must be defined with special care.
Treason
against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against
them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Article III, 3
The
person judged guilty of treason is personally responsible for his
crime, and therefore his family and kin shall not be punished.
No attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood. Article III, 3
Impeachment is a special case.
The
Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments . . . and no
person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the
members present.
Judgment
. . . shall not extend further than to removal from office, and
disqualification to hold any office of honor, trust or profit under the
United States. Article I, 3
A blind spot in the original Constitution is corrected.
Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime . . . Amendment XIII
No state shall . . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Amendment XIV
The separate states are not wholly sovereign.
No state shall enter into any treaty . . . coin money . . . pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Article I, 10
The Method of Freedom
There
is a strong penchant in human nature which impels people who feel
strongly about something—a good cause, say—to group their forces and use
the power of government to fasten their panacea on those they’ve been
unable to persuade. The Constitution is a prime example of the
limitations placed upon governmental power so that people with a cause
to advance must resort to education, persuasion, and example only. This
is the method of freedom, and a people committed to the method of
freedom find the Constitution still an apt instrument for structuring a
society which maximizes freedom and opportunity for all persons. It was
designed to establish a national government internally controlled by
checks and balances between the separate powers. And government was to
be further limited by the federal structure itself, in which the
centripetal power of Washington was to be offset by the centrifugal
powers of the separate states. It was not a perfect document, but it
carried the means of its own correction, and it did embody the consensus
of the people for whom freedom was the prime political good. It was
workable. And it will work again whenever a significant number of people
have the force of intellect to comprehend sound ideas, and the force of
character to make them prevail.
2 comments:
Are really the Mexican and United States governments working mutually against illegal businesses?
What we can see it is that criminals are getting into the political power receiving huge amounts of bribes, illegal management businesses is more relevant than the economy and people of both countries, it seems that basic economic principles are forgotten in the underground of the legal businesses.
Using media, tax money, killing civilians, slavery children among others is only the peak of the iceberg. Bribes have increased given by the BRIC countries as well as supporting all kind of illegalities to increase the wealthiest of the Forbes richest men in the world using Free Trade Agreements when there is no scientific evidence that the accounting principles are even the same in all these countries wishing to increase their commerce, so financial, economic, engineering, accounting frauds are common in this global economy affecting millions of people in extreme poverty while the politicians are getting more and more money on their side all the time, they are using high school consultant coming from Indian origin (Muslim) through IT monopolies and Chinese cyber-attacks in the Cool War.
It is important that the education must be a priority for Latinos in general especially in USA as well as the priority of interest not allowing any more criminals to receive any kind of USA visa protecting our border. The Free Trade Agreements should be evaluated on bases of the comparison of prices for the same product, service or ideas among the participant countries; it should not be fair to receive them several times more expensive that the country of origin. Stop helping unplanned immigrates with our tax money, in other case the immigrates´ country has to invest at the same level in our economy.
Common people has to understand the economic mistakes done are planned, protecting extremist groups like the Opus Dei, the white supremacists (slavery-Nazis using Cold War techniques in LATAM), and other mafias around the world. They are creating a fantasy world that gives magical solutions using these criminal groups in business and government; nobody is impressible to solve scientifically all this situation and they are killed using the force of the Agencies, China and India with electronic weapons worldwide. Only the mafia people are the one defining our future while the BRIC countries are taken advantage, the dark side and the use of the force are better than scientific and technological knowledge for these unethical politicians.
It is important to legalize what it has to be legalized to be more focus in the real economy, and real problems, instead of being working in the unknown illegal businesses and Walt Disney´s fantasies. It is a waste of government time to continue in this unproductive path, and damaging people using the New Order technology (evil Chinese technology) at the same time.
We have to intensify the models of capitalism until all the scenarios are tested before trying to change the capitalist economic models. We cannot allow that BRIC ideas continue affecting the capitalist models we have been using successfully for long time
Found this interesting read and thought I'd share:
O.K., I've got me an idea. Let's say there was a fund set up and the contributions could randomly be sent to it from everywhere in the world. This fund would go to the one that expressly did the most absolutely radical, and officially patriotic, and extreme, and careless, and wild, and crazy thing to help America. In 'X' amount of time, this fund would grow and those of whom participate will remain in extreme secrecy, thrown into a voting pot. Then a group of whom will also remain anonymous will pick the winner, whether it is a group who goes together to do this freedom based thing, or a single person of whom shows more daring and cunning. The judging will strictly be based on popular theme, and/or importance of relative action. I would think it wise that ahead of time proof that this act or action was dubbed and instituted in code before the incident occurs. Odds could be sanctioned and updated for the gamblers among the participants and side action would most likely be another most likely lucrative goal. Monies would be placed in a off-shore distributation account and the winner would be given a secret account that would never show up. Of course in less you wanted the notoriety. Then that would certainly be an addition of play and up to you and/or your group. Huh, do I hear any takers? I do not think this would be considered illegal because there was no plot, no conspiracy, and no announced target goals with the exception of Liberty, and Justice, and Freedom, which is a constitutional right given us by our forefathers. After all, we are all free, aren't we?? Well aren't we???
Post a Comment