How Barack and Michelle Obama lost their law license
Why doesn’t the media and press put these people on the clothes
line? Do you realize if it were anyone else with any proposed clout or
status, they wouldn’t have a prayer with the media. I wonder, wonder
what or who is really in control that so much can be silenced on one
end, yet documented and have a total unraveling of another on the other
end and this person-persons get all the attention. Why doesn’t the
world hear this on World News Tonight with Diane Sawyer or any of the
national news commentators?.
I knew they had both lost their law license, but I
didn't know why until I read this.
This is 100% legit.
I check it out at https://www.iardc.org
Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary
Committee. It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and
they are very strict about the protocol.
Big Surprise.
Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up
Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.
Consider this:
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law
Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to
escape charges he lied on his bar application.
A "Voluntary
Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is
not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew
your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when
you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender"
your license five seconds before the state suspends you.
2 Michelle Obama" voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.
after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her
license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!
3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts. Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/
4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another.
Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the
University of
Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago
released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a
title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a at the University of Chicago School of Law. Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
sA spokepokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
6. "He did not hold the title of Professor of Law," said Marsha
Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in
Law!
7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S. Constitution the other night during his
State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of
Independence ... not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart..tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/
9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address
, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible
diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the
notion that we are all created equal.
10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Mr. President.
By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them
unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the
Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?
When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.
SHARE THIS PLEASE ???
1 comment:
Are really the Mexican and United States governments working mutually against illegal businesses?
What we can see it is that criminals are getting into the political power receiving huge amounts of bribes, illegal management businesses is more relevant than the economy and people of both countries, it seems that basic economic principles are forgotten in the underground of the legal businesses.
Using media, tax money, killing civilians, slavery children among others is only the peak of the iceberg. Bribes have increased given by the BRIC countries as well as supporting all kind of illegalities to increase the wealthiest of the Forbes richest men in the world using Free Trade Agreements when there is no scientific evidence that the accounting principles are even the same in all these countries wishing to increase their commerce, so financial, economic, engineering, accounting frauds are common in this global economy affecting millions of people in extreme poverty while the politicians are getting more and more money on their side all the time, they are using high school consultant coming from Indian origin (Muslim) through IT monopolies and Chinese cyber-attacks in the Cool War.
It is important that the education must be a priority for Latinos in general especially in USA as well as the priority of interest not allowing any more criminals to receive any kind of USA visa protecting our border. The Free Trade Agreements should be evaluated on bases of the comparison of prices for the same product, service or ideas among the participant countries; it should not be fair to receive them several times more expensive that the country of origin. Stop helping unplanned immigrates with our tax money, in other case the immigrates´ country has to invest at the same level in our economy.
Common people has to understand the economic mistakes done are planned, protecting extremist groups like the Opus Dei, the white supremacists (slavery-Nazis using Cold War techniques in LATAM), and other mafias around the world. They are creating a fantasy world that gives magical solutions using these criminal groups in business and government; nobody is impressible to solve scientifically all this situation and they are killed using the force of the Agencies, China and India with electronic weapons worldwide. Only the mafia people are the one defining our future while the BRIC countries are taken advantage, the dark side and the use of the force are better than scientific and technological knowledge for these unethical politicians.
It is important to legalize what it has to be legalized to be more focus in the real economy, and real problems, instead of being working in the unknown illegal businesses and Walt Disney´s fantasies. It is a waste of government time to continue in this unproductive path, and damaging people using the New Order technology (evil Chinese technology) at the same time.
We have to intensify the models of capitalism until all the scenarios are tested before trying to change the capitalist economic models. We cannot allow that BRIC ideas continue affecting the capitalist models we have been using successfully for long time
Post a Comment