Sunday, March 31, 2019


    TWITTER HAS SHUT ME DOWN COMPLETELY 

     THIS IS CENSORSHIP OF CONSERVATIVES!






  1. John Gaultier

    John Gaultier

    @JohnGaltier

    I AM A FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE.American Patriot. 100% for
    San Antonio, TX
    facebook.com/TPFAR
    Joined December 2011
    1,796 Photos and videos
    Your Tweet activity
    Your Tweets earned 3,209 impressions over the last 24 hours
    7PM
    7PM
    View your top Tweets

    ·
    · View all


    Find people you know Import your contacts from Gmail

    Trends for you

    · Change Change trend settings

    Tweets

    1. 1h1 hour ago
    John Gaultier Retweeted John Gaultier
    Friends..READ AND RE TWEET!
    John Gaultier added,

    🤯🤯🤯🤯 EXPLOSIVE NEW INFO ! WOW ! 🤯🤯🤯🤯 …
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
  3. 4h4 hours ago

    4. The noose is tightening.. Hillary will have to squeal and make a deal.. I THINK HILLARY WILL COMMIT SUICIDE PRETTY SOON ( Yeah they will do to her what her thugs did to so many other people. Then they will Eulogize her and Cover their tracks. The powers are bigger than her!
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  5. 4h4 hours ago

    6. John Gaultier Retweeted Fox News
    EXACTLY! This is what emboldened assholes do in any country that gives them a break. Its the same with Muslims all over Europe. ARE WE AS STUPID AS THE EUROPEANS? I THINK NOT!
    John Gaultier added,


    8:29
    .: “Citizenship is a privilege. We don’t grant it to people because they think they deserve it.”
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  7. Retweeted
    6h6 hours ago

    8. Replying to
    yes--exactly correct. Rosenstein is aiding & protecting the guilty DOJ/FBI. And what's worse AG Sessions has defended Rosenstein as being "a good man" FIRE THEM BOTH ASAP Pres, Trump..
    0 replies 1 retweet 1 like





  9. 6h6 hours ago

    10. Rod Rosenstein should not have any position in President Trump’s administration, let alone one with so much power to harm the Office of the Presidency.
    1 reply 0 retweets 1 like





  11. 6h6 hours ago

    12. Loretta Lynch As Attorney General used a Bogus email name JUST LIKE OBAMA!
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  13. 7h7 hours ago

    14. FACEBOOK & TWITTER CENSORS CONSERVATIVES. CONGRESS MUST BREAK IT UP UNDER MONOPOLIES ACT! We must ask CONGRESS & Trump Admin to file an Anti Monopoly Lawsuit against Facebook & TWITTER
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  15. 7h7 hours ago

    16. Who is John Podesta? Here's everything you need to know! THIS IS JOHN PODESTA! Handmaiden to George Soros Paid whore and Leftist Money Raker!
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  17. 7h7 hours ago

    18. Breaking News. Hillary Clinton broke the same Campaign Laws that Dinesh Desouza did. He was locked up Shouldn't she be ? LOCK HER UP JEFF SESSIONS!
    0 replies 3 retweets 4 likes





  19. 7h7 hours ago

    20. Rod Rosenstein SECRETLY EXPANDED THE SCOPE of Mueller Probe? Where is Jeff Sessions?
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  21. 7h7 hours ago

    22. SHADOW BANNING ... HOW FACEBOOK AND THE SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS CENSOR CONSERVATIVES EXPOSED: FACEBOOK IS SHADOW BANNING ME AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER CONSERVATIVES.
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  23. 7h7 hours ago

    24. THE DACA CON:
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  25. 7h7 hours ago

    26. THE OBAMA CLINTON FBI DOJ CONNECTION. Once you understand it everything makes sense.
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  27. 7h7 hours ago

    28. Yes take America Back to the Good Old Days when America was "AMERICA" I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS.
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  29. Retweeted
    11h11 hours ago

    30. Headline.ws Retweeted Scott Baio
    A male Hollywood actor supporting & movement is prime target. We live in social media era where accused is guilty on accusation alone. Do your own research & hear both sides before casting judgment. Better yet, let courts & God cast judgment.
    Headline.ws added,

    My Facebook live statement about the claims.
    8 replies 104 retweets 166 likes





  31. 8h8 hours ago

    32. John Gaultier Retweeted John Gaultier
    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 GAME ON... and arrest the illegals!
    John Gaultier added,

    👮🏼👮🏼👮🏼 GAME ON !! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 Pelosi threatens to bring 'Dreamers' to the State of the Union, Trump fires back that he will bring ICE agents…
    0 replies 1 retweet 3 likes





  33. 8h8 hours ago

    34. 👮🏼👮🏼👮🏼 GAME ON !! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 Pelosi threatens to bring 'Dreamers' to the State of the Union, Trump fires back that he will bring ICE agents GAME ON 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
    1 reply 4 retweets 10 likes





  35. 9h9 hours ago

    36. Working with Democrats is like working with the Camel. Once you figure that out... negotiations can be adjusted. are you listening??
    0 replies 1 retweet 1 like





  37. 9h9 hours ago

    38. John Gaultier Retweeted Tom Fitton
    It's a race against the Trump Removal Clock. They have a plan to remove Trump and anything that inhibits that progress will be handed over very very slowly.
    John Gaultier added,

    " knew there were text messages to be had. We sued back in Sept for texts of the # two at the FBI, Andrew McCabe. And they just told us this week they gave us everything they were gonna give us and not one text message was turned over."
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  39. 9h9 hours ago

    40. John Gaultier Retweeted Ava Armstrong
    John Gaultier added,

    Organizing For Action A nice name for sedition, treason. This sick bastard is dangerous.…
    0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    (1) This is . He is in his 40s. He works for the . He was the only person to interview , with no recording, on her investigation .
    219 replies 1,679 retweets 1,687 likes










  41. Jan 18
    42. (2) How many family members are there? There are only 100 total Americans out of 300 million with this name . You can Google this. must be unique in such a small family, right?
    9 replies 194 retweets 233 likes










  43. Jan 18
    44. (3) The father of (ii) is Peter Strzok Sr, and he was in the Army core of engineers. Oh, he was actually a career expert in sanctions and nuclear activity in .
    6 replies 247 retweets 280 likes










  45. Jan 18
    46. (4) The younger brother of Sr is who works for - They are world leaders in big cranes, with a speciality in moving nuclear Reactors.
    4 replies 220 retweets 253 likes










  47. Jan 18
    48. (5) The son of is , who is a coast guard graduate and now also lives in DC .
    1 reply 146 retweets 191 likes
Posted by at No comments:

Friday, March 29, 2019

THE FUTILE CASE FOR THE DEMS IN THE HOUSE TO TRY AND IMPEACH TRUMP

PATRIOTS.. BE PREPARED TO TAKE UP ARMS!

 THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO PUSH THROUGH AN ILLEGAL IMPEACHMENT PROCESS!

IMPEACHMENT DOES NOT MEAN REMOVAL FROM THE PRESIDENCY. Impeachment is a 3 Part Process. Understand it!


HERE IS THE INFO ON HOW 

 

IMPEACHMENT ACTUALLY WORKS!.

 

The Impeachment Process
A common misconception is that impeachment of an official means his or her removal from office. In fact, impeachment functions as an indictment of a public official; it allows the legislature to bring formal charges against a civil officer of government. After an official has been impeached, or formally charged, a trial is held to determine whether or not the official will be removed from office.
In the US Federal Government, the House of Representatives impeaches government officials and the trial takes place before the Senate. The House votes on the articles of impeachment, requiring a simple majority to pass them. Upon passage of the articles, an individual has been impeached.

Impeachable Offenses
According to the US Constitution, "Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors" justify impeachment, although the exact definition of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" is often the subject of debate. 
Usually, impeachment is reserved for serious offenses and abuses of power, and it is up to the impeaching body to determine whether or not an offense is impeachable. Offenses do not have to violate criminal law in order to be impeachable.
UNLESS THE SENATE TRIES HIM... THERE IS NO REMOVAL FROM OFFICE.

The Trial
After the House of Representatives impeaches, the Senate tries the accused. Senators are sworn in as jurors and rules for the proceedings are established. When a US President is impeached, the Chief Justice of the United States presides; 
A two-thirds majority is required to convict; otherwise, the accused is acquitted. 

The Consequences
A conviction by the Senate brings immediate removal from office. If an official is convicted, the Senate may take a second vote to determine whether or not to bar the official from holding any public office in the future. The Senate trial does not constitute a criminal trial and the Senate decision does not have power beyond removal from office and barring of future public office. The impeached official is still subject to criminal prosecution for any criminal offenses that were included in the articles of impeachment.
ASK THE QUESTION WHY!
The Democrats are desperate to remove Trump before he exposes the Dirty Secrets yet to come out.
Secrets like how the Obama Gang and the Hillary Gang agreed to share the spoils of "Pay to play" so long as the Obama DOJ looked the other way while Hillary and the Clinton Foundation raked in all the money they could. They shared the spoils.

You really think that the Obama and the DOJ did not know about the Clinton Pay to Play? Really ?? Come on now. The Obama gang was the most suspicious and sneaky administration ever. They poked around about everyone and then used their knowledge to blackmail the offenders to get their own ends. They blackmailed the
Last Pope, Angela Merkel and even Chief Justice Roberts to get their ends.
So you really think that some vague Rouge DOJ and FBI heads acted without the implicit approval of the Obama Gang ? Really ? What planet are you from??
Obama despised Hillary and Bill. Why they got together is very simple. Billions and Billions of Dollars at stake to be stolen.

That is why this whole plan was hatched. To prevent the world from ever knowing what they had done during the 8 years of Obama's Crooked Rule! If Clinton won no one would have ever known.
They had to assure that Hillary won so then they could continue on the path to pillage the Treasury of America!

But Trump won and now they are trying to take him out before the path leads back to the Real crooks behind the scenes.


DON'T BE STUPID.. THAT'S WHY THE "Intelligence Idiots" got is wrong intentionally! If the same information given to the real Intelligence Community they would have figured it out in a heartbeat and also would have found themselves "Suicided"

 








WISE UP

ASK YOURSELVES WHY PEOPLE!





Now back to our discussion.

Can the Senate Decline to Try an Impeachment Case?

Does the Senate have an obligation to conduct a trial of the president if the House impeaches him? With the increased prospects for an impeachment inquiry now that the Democrats have taken control of the House of Representatives, most discussions of impeachment have assumed that, should the House vote to impeachment, the Senate will then hold a trial. 
This is the construction of the Constitution’s provisions setting out the impeachment process: If the House impeaches, then it would follow that the Senate tries the case. (This is what the Senate did on the two occasions, in the cases of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, that the House voted articles of impeachment.)
Do the current Senate Rules allow for variance? They contemplate that when the House has voted an impeachment, the Senate will be notified, the House managers will present their case and trial proceedings, which the rules prescribe in some detail, will begin. 
But it is also possible that, based on the Democrats own modification of the rules when Harry Reid made sure that he protected the Obama Presidency in every way he could... it eroded all institutional practices and norms, so...the current leadership of the Senate could choose to play the Harry Reid card as well and could attempt to prevent the trial of a House impeachment of Donald Trump.  A Constitutional scholar would not have to look far to find the constitutional arguments and the flexibility to revise Senate rules and procedures to accomplish this purpose.
The Constitution does not by its express terms direct the Senate to try an impeachment. In fact, it confers on the Senate "the sole power to try,”   ( Or NOT )  which is a conferral of exclusive constitutional authority and not a procedural command.

The Constitution couches the power to impeach in the same terms: it is the House’s “sole power.” The House may choose to impeach or not, and one can imagine an argument that the Senate is just as free, in the exercise of its own “sole power,” to decline to try any impeachment that the House elects to vote.
The current rules governing Senate practice and procedure do not pose an insurmountable problem for this maneuver. Senate leadership can seek to have the rules “reinterpreted” at any time by the device of seeking a ruling of the chair on the question, and avoiding a formal revision of the rule that would require supermajority approval. 

So using the obstructionist Harry Reid Rules in the Senate...The question presented in some form would be whether, under the relevant rules, the Senate is required or NOT to hold an impeachment “trial” fully consistent with current rules—or even any trial at all. A chair’s ruling in the affirmative would be subject to being overturned by a majority, not two-thirds, vote.
It can be argued.. that the rules also cannot constitutionally bind the Senate to a trial of a House impeachment if, in the exercise of its “sole power” to try, it decides against one. In this way, the Senate rule may be “reinterpreted.” 
The Senate has options for scuttling the impeachment process beyond a simple refusal to heed the House vote. The Constitution does not specify what constitutes a “trial,” and in a 1993 case involving a judicial impeachment, the Supreme Court affirmed that the Senate’s “sole power” to “try” means that it is not subject to any limitations on how it could conduct a proceeding. Senate leadership could engineer an early motion to dismiss and effectively moot the current rule’s call for the president or counsel to appear before the Senate. The rules in place provide at any rate only that “the Senate shall have power to compel the attendance of witnesses”: they do not require that any other than the president be called. Moreover, the Senate could adjourn at any time, terminating the proceedings and declining to take up the House articles. This is what happened in the trial of Andrew Johnson, in which the Senate voted on three articles and then adjourned without holding votes on the remaining eight.
This discussion does not engage in depth with all the parliamentary possibilities and intricacies. But it is sufficient to say for present purposes that, if the House of Representatives were to impeach the president, Senate Republicans would be in a position, if so inclined, to scuttle any trial and they should because what the Dems are attempting to do is to cover up for their leaders crimes. The Coup failed so now procedural methods are being tried.

Republicans have laid the groundwork for rejecting the legitimacy of a House impeachment. The president and his party’s leadership and supporters have repeatedly and vociferously characterized the strong Democratic criticisms of Trump as infected to the core by unremitting partisanship, personal hatred, anunrelenting refusal since Election Day to accept the result of the 2016 election andunlawful or unethical conduct by the Department of Justice, the FBI, the special counsel and the press. And whatever evidence eventually surfaces, Senate Republicans have already shrugged off the president’s appearance in a successful criminal prosecution as “Individual 1,” an allegedly active participant in a conspiracy to violate the campaign finance laws. As the debate over impeachment process plays out over 2019, and as the 2020 presidential campaign already underway intensifies, those advancing this case may argue for letting the voters decide.
All of this may seem academic in the extreme. The Mueller probe has already EXONERATED TRUMP. The Witch hunt was exhaustive in scope and attempt to undermine Trump..Mueller - the final tally:

675 days, 19 liberal lawyers, 40 FBI Agents, $50 million taxpayer  dollars, 28 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 500 + witnesses, 230 communication reports, 50 phone taps, 12 foreign government intelligent requests, There were Eight convictions on charges unrelated to the purpose of his investigation and unrelated to Trump or the Trump Campaign, a jailed attorney and 25 accused Russians laughing at the USA BUT NO COLLUSION. 
So..the  House has yet to even initiate an impeachment inquiry. Lets see if they dare take on WE THE PEOPLE THROUGH ANOTHER ILLEGAL MANEUVER.
IF THEY DO. DO NOT BE BYSTANDERS AGAIN! ITS TIME TO LOCK AND LOAD!


Posted by at 2 comments:
Labels: , ,

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

PROOF POSITIVE TRUMP DID NOT SAY WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN CHARLOTTESVILLE WERE GOOD PEOPLE. THE LIE EXPOSED

 

You have heard the endless Accusations that Donald Trump is a Racist and then you hear the word " Charlottesville, Virginia" in the same breath. It always the same Bullshit every time... The left wants to negate a lifetime of Donald Trump working with, dating and hanging out with Blacks and other Colored People by bringing up the words "dog whistle to his White supremacist base" with his "comments at Charlottesville, Virginia. Ask or listen to any Lefty Mob Idiot who is asked to give proof that Trump is Racist and they will race to the "Charlottesville, Virginia"  comment/ That's the only one they can find. But its a bit of edited fiction created by the left!

Based on that logic... Obama IS A MUSLIM.. he said so himself.
Listen: to the video!

Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Joel Pollak dismantled the lie that President Donald Trump described white supremacists and neo-Nazis as “very fine people” following 2017’s demonstrations and riots in Charlottesville, VA.   

LISTEN TO IT UNEDITED




 Trump said (emphasis added):

"You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. …
 You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, — to them — a very, very important statute and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down statutes to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think about Thomas Jefferson? Do you like him? Are we going to take down his statute? Because he was a major slave-owner. Now are we going to take down his statute? You’re changing history. You’re changing culture, and you had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly."


Pollak continued, “But it is also upsetting that our media are determined to link President Donald Trump to any atrocity half a world away when he has repeatedly denounced white nationalism ( yes Morons there is a Difference!) neo-Nazis, the KKK, et cetera, et cetera, bigotry of every form. And they are determined to make this his fault somehow. Even our friends Fox News are playing along with this idea. I heard John Roberts today on Special Report cite the terrorist’s manifesto and some of the positive things he said about Donald Trump, leaving out the negative things he said about Donald Trump.”

Pollak noted the ubiquity with which news media outlet perpetuate the aforementioned false claim about Trump and its impact on the public’s perception of associated events.

“There is a determined effort by our media to link New Zealand to Donald Trump, and they can’t do so on any factual basis, so they’re obscuring parts of the truth and returning to a litany of complaints against Donald Trump that is by now familiar to many people,” stated Pollak. “At the top of that list — which to our media supposedly proves that Donald Trump is a racist — is the claim that he referred to neo-Nazis and white supremacists at the Charlottesville, Virginia, protests in August of 2017 as ‘very fine people, Those of you listening to this broadcast might actually believe he said that, and you can be forgiven for believing that because it has been drummed into our heads, collectively, by the mainstream media, and particularly CNN.”

“Donald Trump was not talking about those people [when he said very fine people]. In fact, Donald Trump specifically excluded those people from the people he was talking about as ‘very fine people.’ This lie has been repeated over and over again on CNN and it is a lie that intends to demonstrate to us that the president thinks white supremacists and neo-Nazis are good people., and that proves he’s a racist, proves he’s responsible for the violence in New Zealand and everywhere else. That is the purpose for which this lie is used an CNN keeps returning to it over and over again, and it’s spreading to other places.”

Listen again to what Trump actually said, because what you’re going to hear is he was talking about protesters around the issue of the removal of the statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee, and you’re also going to hear him say that the neo-Nazis and white supremacists are not the people he’s talking about when he says ‘very fine people.’ You’re going to want to hear this. You may not have hear it before. You may not remember it, because you’ve heard the fake version. The deceptively edited version so many times. But this is the actual clip of Donald Trump on that day, August 15, 2017, talking about ‘very fine people.’

A segment of Trump’s press conference (relevant portion begins at 12:05) regarding the Charlottesville protests and riots on August 15, 2017, was then played. Trump said (emphasis added):

You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. …

You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, — to them — a very, very important statute and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down statutes to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think about Thomas Jefferson? Do you like him? Are we going to take down his statute? Because he was a major slave-owner. Now are we going to take down his statute? You’re changing history. You’re changing culture, and you had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
“So now that you’ve heard it, you now know that everyone telling you that ‘very fine people’ refers to neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and white nationalists is lying to you, or they are ignorant or ideologues trained by spohisticated Anti American forces embedded deep inside the Framework of America working continuously like termites.. chewing on the fabric of America working in damp dark spaces working to bring America down. You know who they are. They are the Trojan Termites within our walls. No you have  heard it yourself. Donald Trump specifically used that phrase to refer to, firstly, the demonstrators that were there to protest the removal of a statue, and he also used it to refer to the peaceful counter-demonstrators on the left; those who came to protest racism, as they saw it.”
Trump similarly condemned the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis “in the strongest possible terms” on August 13, 2017, during a televised statement from the White House. A segment was shared:

As I said on Saturday, we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America, and as I have said many times before, no matter the color of skin, we all live under the same laws, we all salute the same great flag, and we are all made by the same almighty God. We must love each other, show affection for each other, and unite together in condemnation of hatred, bigotry, and violence. We must rediscover the bonds of love and loyalty that bring us together as Americans. Racism is evil, and those that cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans. We are a nation founded on the truth that all of us are created equal.
Pollak remarked, “Alright, so you heard him there denounce neo-Nazis and the KKK in the strongest possible terms as repugnant and contrary to the American ideal. He did it from the White House. You have not heard any of that in the last few days since the terror attacks in New Zealand. You haven’t heard one journalist cite that speech. You haven’t heard anybody recall it. That is partly because the press conference the next day was such a big deal, such a controversy. But it’s also because the media have willfully forgotten it. They have buried it. They do not want you to remember that Trump has already condemned these groups multiple times in the strongest possible terms.”
Pollak noted how Trump, unlike many other world leaders, directed action towards protecting Muslims in countries like Syria.
“The implication is that he hasn’t shown empathy for Muslims already, and that it also false, because Donald Trump has shown not just empathy, but action to protect Muslims from being killed,” Pollak commented. “Let me give you the best example. It’s one, again, the media are not talking about. When Donald Trump heard that Bashar al-Assad, the dictator of Syria — who is not Muslim, by the way — was using chemical weapons against civilians, most of whom are Muslims, Donald Trump because emotively angry, emotional. He became viscerally angry, and that’s when he ordered the airstrikes on Syria against the opposition of many conservative critics of interventionist foreign policy, including some critics at Breitbart.com. Donald Trump said, ‘I’m going to do something about this,’ because he was so moved by the death of those Muslim civilians.”
Pollak went on, “This is Donald Trump’s actual practical reaction to the death of innocent Muslim civilians. He is the only world leader who has done anything to protect those civilians, hundreds of thousands of whom were slaughtered in the Syrian Civil War by their government. All of these people coming out now and blaming Donald Trump and saying it’s his language about Muslims that somehow inspired the New Zealand terror attacks, I want to ask you something — and I want to put this question specifically to our two new Muslim members of Congress, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, they have said nothing — absolutely nothing — as a million Muslims in China have been herded into concentration camps, many dying there, many going to some unknown fate, the Trump administration has spoken out against it, vigorously, in the first ever international Ministerial on Religious Freedom, the Trump administration put out a statement condemning China for this.
The news media and broader left, observed Pollak, is more interested in the mass murder of Muslims when the perpetrator is a “crazy white nationalist terrorist.”
“Why is it only when a crazy white nationalist terrorist attacks and kills innocent Muslims that there’s an outcry,” asked Pollak. “Why is there not an outcry when Muslims are being killed by other people, by other Muslims? Where is the moral outrage? Is that Donald Trump’s fault, too? Donald Trump has done more to protect Muslims than any president of that last, well, you know what? I’ll give George Bush and Bill Clinton credit. George Bush argued, at least, that Muslims civilians deserve protection from Saddam Hussein, and Bill Clinton went to war in Kosovo. Donald Trump is in that tradition.”

Spread the truth and expose the lies!  Share and call them out!
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Sunday, March 17, 2019

New Zealand mass shooter is a far-Left “eco-fascist” who praised communist China.

New Zealand mass shooter is a far-Left “eco-fascist” who praised communist China. LEFTY FAKE NEWS US MEDIA LIED ABOUT HIS REAL AFFILIATIONS!

As usual, the lying mainstream media is busy plastering up fake headlines all over the place about the latest mass shooting incident that took place in New Zealand, describing the alleged shooter as a “Trump-supporting white supremacist” who hates Muslims for being brown. But the guy’s own 1,500-page manifesto, which Big Tech is actively trying to scrub from the web, by the way, tells a much different story.
Tarrant’s full manifesto is available for online viewing at this link. READ IT AND YOU CAN SEE FOR YOUR SELF..  This low IQ 28 year old stiff did not pen this manifesto. It was planned and put together by deep dark forces we are trying to identify. It was cveratinly not the work of a low level nut job. 

Follow his money trail. New Zealand has no death penalty.. so he will not be put to death. He chose New Zealand because of this fact. Someone or some group close to him will be paid money. Just like Hamas pays suicide bombers for blowing themselves up in Israel.

 

He also traveled to many 3rd world countries including Muslim Pakistan. If he was a "White Supremacist" he would not be grunging around in Islamic Brown skinned people's countries! What a joke ! This was just teh Lefty media's narative !

Far from being a rally-attending apologist for President Donald Trump like the fake media is now claiming, 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant, the man whom Australian media outlets have named as the shooter, is a self-described “eco-fascist by nature” – meaning he’s a Leftist that’s more aligned with Democrats than Republicans.
Tarrant clearly wrote in his rambling manifesto, in response to a question he apparently posed to himself, that he certainly does not support President Trump. “As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no,” were Tarrant’s exact words, unequivocally indicating that, contrary to fake news claims, he likely wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a MAGA (Make America Great Again) hat.
Tarrant’s diary goes on to reveal that he’s anything but a conservative, and is actually more aligned with radical domestic terrorist groups like Antifa. In response to another question he posed to himself about where he aligns both politically and socially, Tarrant had this to say, in no uncertain terms:
“The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China.”

In other words, Tarrant is a full-fledged communist, just like Democrat Darling and failed 2016 presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, 


 For more news about how the fake news media routinely spins tragedies to paint conservatives in a negative light.

Brenton Tarrant says his intent was to spark civil war in America, claims Candace Owens “influenced me above all”

As to why Tarrant decided to carry out this particular attack, his manifesto reveals that one of his primary aims was to “create conflict” between opposing ideologies in the United States as it concerns legal gun ownership. His apparent hope was that this ongoing battle over the Second Amendment would result in another civil war, which he believes “will eventually balkanize the U.S. along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.”

Tarrant also bizarrely credited conservative pundit Candace Owens for being the person that “radicalized” him and “influenced me above all,” further describing Owens as someone whose insights and views “helped push me further and further into the belief of violence over meekness.” Candace Owens is BLACK. White Supremacists do not have Black mentors or heroes! Another Give away.

How come the fake news never clearly identifies Muslims whenever they carry out terror attacks?

Keep in mind that Candace Owens is a black woman, which suggests that Tarrant isn’t doing a very good job at being the “white supremacist” that the fake news media is claiming he is. Further, he describes himself as transitioning from communism, to anarchism, to libertarianism, to eco-fascist. This is a set up!

But almost none of this is being reported in the mainstream news, as fake headline after fake headline pushes the narrative that Tarrant is no different than you’re average Trump supporter. Even worse are the escalating Leftist dog whistles against white people, conservatism, patriotism, and gun rights – as if some deranged New Zealander has anything to do with these things here in the United States.
Had this incident been inverted, with a deranged Muslim storming into a Christian church and murdering several dozen innocent people, you can be sure that the mainstream media would be working overtime to conceal the shooter’s ethnic and religious identity. And anyone who actually told the truth in this hypothetical scenario would have been immediately labeled “Islamophobic.”
But because the shooter in this case has lighter skin and doesn’t claim that Allah is God, fake news outlets are having a heyday branding him with all sorts of anti-white, anti-Trump stereotypes in an attempt to foment more Leftist rage against Caucasians, while simultaneously fueling anti-Second Amendment sentiments.
“It’s like clockwork,” wrote one commenter at The Gateway Pundit about the fake news media’s tired and obvious tactic of exploiting tragedies like this to promote their anti-American agendas.
“The left immediately exploits tragedy and horror as a tool to bludgeon their opposition and critics and promote their agenda. The dead and dying have not even been moved from the scene before they start in with their hateful ideological harangue. They don’t mourn the victims, they cheer the political potential of their demise. That isn’t just sick, it’s evil.”

THIS IS A STAGED ATTACK!





Posted by at No comments:
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)