Obama actions on Amnesty Constitute a Federal Crime. Who will act ? Who will Bitch and Whine?

Obama Amnesty May Be a Federal Crime

(from Judicial Watch) 

THE BIGGER QUESTION IS THE BLAH 

BLAH BLAH FACTOR. WILL ANYONE .. I 

MEAN ANYONE DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT

 EXCEPT BITCH AND WHINE??

So, just how much money is being spent in response to executive actions taken to house and accommodate illegal aliens? Your Judicial Watch is calling on members of Congress to take a hard look at the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and the Deferred Action to Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program.  These programs are two key parts of Obama's illegal amnesty effort and involve violations of law that carry civil and criminal penalties.  Yesterday, as Obama's Democrat allies (with silent support, I'm sure, from more than a few Republican colleagues) mounted a filibuster in the United State Senate to prevent funding of the Department of Homeland Security in order to enable Obama's continued lawlessness, we urgently put out an action item for your elected representatives:

"Judicial Watch calls upon Congress, its committees, or its members to request that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigate, analyze, and opine on the following issues:

"Whether Congress has specifically appropriated the funds or has specifically authorized the assessment of fees necessary for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to implement the plans to extend Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (DACA) and establish Deferred Action to Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA);

"To the extent no funds have been specifically appropriated, whether USCIS is using funds appropriated, including any monies raised by fees assessed by USCIS, for a different, designated purpose to fund the implementation the plans to extend DACA and establish DAPA;

"To the extent any funds, including any monies raised by fees assessed by USCIS, are being used to implement the plans to extend DACA and establish DAPA, whether the use of such funds is unauthorized or prohibited.

"Whether USCIS is using property or employees designated for a specific purpose to implement the plans to extend DACA and establish DAPA, regardless of such designation.

"The legal issues involving the improper use of taxpayer dollars are urgent given that the USCIS may have already entered into or imminently will enter into contracts and/or do so. This unauthorized spending may be a direct violation of the Antideficiency Act, which makes it a violation of law, with potential civil and criminal penalties, for government officials to spend monies that have not been appropriated by Congress.  President Obama's nullification of immigration law is broad and involves numerous policies in multiple federal agencies, but the center of the storm is in USCIS, where monies are being misspent in ways contrary to the fundamental purpose of that law enforcement agency."

Our legal team reports that the Antideficiency Act generally prohibits an officer or employee of the U.S. government from:

[M]aking or authorizing an expenditure from, or creating or authorizing an obligation under, any appropriation or fund in excess of the amount available in the appropriation or fund unless authorized by law; involving the government in any obligation to pay money before funds have been appropriated for that purpose, unless otherwise allowed by law; accepting voluntary services for the United States, or employing personal services not authorized by law, except in cases of emergency involving the safety of human life or the protection of property; making obligations or expenditures in excess of an apportionment or reapportionment, or in excess of the amount permitted by agency regulations.

To the extent an officer or employee may be in violation of the Antideficiency Act, Congress mandates that the Comptroller General, the head of GAO, conduct an investigation of the matter. The Obama gang was most recently found to have violated this law by the GAO in the scandalous release of terrorists in the Bergdahl swap scandal. 

The GAO warns that violators of the Antideficiency Act:

"[S]hall be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office."

In addition, an officer or employee who "knowingly and willfully" violates [the law] "shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both."

Some in the U.S. Senate seem to understand the legal stakes. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) joined with Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Homeland Security Chairman Ron Johnson (R-WI.) to write a letteraddressed to Joseph Moore, Chief Financial Officer for the USCIS, that asks for highly pertinent financial information. The letter correctly points out that Obama's directives "will redirect scarce resources away" from the USCIS's "core mission" for activities Congress never approved. And, it makes the following, very pointed, request:

To assist us in our constitutional oversight responsibilities, we are asking you, as Chief Financial Officer, to provide a detailed accounting of all expenditures by USCIS to date and a projection of all temporary and permanent expenditures for these executive actions, including the source of the funds to be used and the specific accounts in which the funds are located, in dollar amounts. Please also indicate the amount USCIS is projected to spend on these programs from FY2015 through FY2025 on a monthly and annual basis.

Instead of doing the public's business to enforce immigration law, the USCIS has been hijacked by President Obama and his appointees to aid, abet, and harbor illegal aliens - in absolute violation of the law.  Obviously, Congress never appropriated money for the lawlessness.  The strict enforcement of the Antideficiency Act against this egregious misappropriation of government monies (your tax dollars) is one more "rule of law" tool that may help to bring the administration's illicit actions to a halt.

TIME FOR REVOLUTION.... THIS IS 

SOLVED ONLY BY 

DRASTIC ACTION..

Obama demands Marines disarm in Yemen. Time to REMOVE OBAMA

DISGRACEFUL.. UNACCEPTABLE... READ AND SHARE!!
MARINES ITS TIME TO REMOVE THE CIC

 

Hussein Obama State Department Forces Marines to Disarm:

Gives into Yemen Rebels Demands and turns tail and runs!
This is the worst cases of trying to destroy the morale of our military that I’ve ever seen, U.S. Marines were forced to disarm because the U.S. State Department bowed down to Yemen Rebel’s demands.

As conditions worsened in Yemen, The Obama State Department forced U.S. Marines to surrender their weapons as they evacuated the U.S. Embassy in Yemen. Who gave the exact order is not yet clear, but Army Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, confirmed the Marines handed over their M-9 pistols and M-4 carbines before evacuating.
A senior defense official has confirmed to Fox News that Marines were directed to turn over their weapons after leaving the U.S. embassy in Yemen. The Marine Corps doesn’t deny that they were disarmed, but say the Marines removed each bolt from their weapons body and rendered them inoperable by smashing them with a sledgehammer.
The Marine Corps does not dispute the reporting that CENTCOM is outraged over weapons being rendered inoperable. They released the following statement:
The Marine Security Force left the American embassy in Yemen for the movement to the airfield as part of the “ordered departure” with only personal weapons. All crew served weapons were destroyed at the embassy prior to movement. None of them were ‘handed over’ in any way to anyone. The destruction of weapons at the embassy and the airport was carried out in accordance with an approved destruction plan.
Upon arrival at the airfield, all personal weapons were rendered inoperable in accordance with advance planning. Specifically, each bolt was removed from its weapons body and rendered inoperable by smashing with sledgehammers. The weapons bodies, minus the bolts, were then separately smashed with sledgehammers. All of these destroyed components were left at the airport — and components were scattered; no usable weapon was taken from any Marine at Sana’a airport.
Read the Marine Rifle Creed..
Since World War II Marines have learned to recite the Rifleman’s Creed…
This is my rifle. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
My rifle is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life.
My rifle, without me, is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless. I must fire my rifle true. I must shoot straighter than my enemy who is trying to kill me. I must shoot him before he shoots me. I will…
My rifle and myself know that what counts in this war is not the rounds we fire, the noise of our burst, nor the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count. We will hit…
My rifle is human, even as I, because it is my life. Thus, I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weaknesses, its strength, its parts, its accessories, its sights and its barrel. I will ever guard it against the ravages of weather and damage as I will ever guard my legs, my arms, my eyes and my heart against damage. I will keep my rifle clean and ready. We will become part of each other. We will…
Before God, I swear this creed. My rifle and myself are the defenders of my country. We are the masters of our enemy. We are the saviors of my life.
So be it, until victory is America’s and there is no enemy, but peace!
**************************
Now tell me why a Marine should stand by Hussein Obama/ He has never served.. he hates the Military and he is trying his best to humiliate them.
THIS MUST NOT STAND... RRR

Hussein Obama you are a Fraud perpetrated on the American People by your Socialist Masters. WE KNOW !

HUSSEIN OBAMA... YOU ARE A FRAUD..

 

THE DAY WILL COME WHEN THE MILITARY WILL COME TO ARREST YOU.

 

THE JIG WILL FINALLY BE UP!

 

There isn’t a soul in Congress that doesn’t know Barry is not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency of the United States as an Indonesian-born child. For those that want to laugh, point fingers, and say the word “birther” SEVEN times in every sentence they use (getting louder with each one) trying refute me, this post, or the VOLUMES of proof supporting this post…save your breath. Seriously. 

 

Using the word “Birther” is about as asinine as calling Obamacare “affordable.” Rather than use silly name calling, try doing some research. For even the most basic starting point, one just needs a SHRED of common sense (which excludes most liberals). No one spends MILLIONS hiding their past if there is nothing to hide. Remember what Professor Gruber said about the STUPIDITY of the American Voters? If you voted for this clown, with a sealed background, YOU are THE STUPID VOTERS Gruber was referring to. 

 

Furthermore, you might want to know it was LAW ENFORCEMENT, not Right-Wing Tea-Baggers who proved the birth certificate Obama presented was a fraud when they set out to SHUT UP the “Birthers” by proving the birth certificate was AUTHENTIC. Sheriff Arpaio was SICK of hearing about it, so he figured to prove the authenticity and silence the “Birthers” once and for all. As it turns out, not only did Arpaio’s team prove the birth certificate is a fraud, it is a REALLY bad one from what they say.  

 

For additional proof there have been FAKED birth certificates, look to the lawsuit that took place in Alabama! Team Obama was so careless with the fakes, they accidentally turned in THREE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT VERSIONS of his alleged birth certificate to Alabama in his run for President. Good luck getting liberals to conjure up anything that sounds even remotely intelligent to support that screw up. If there wasn't forgery going on, how could there be THREE different versions? Could that happen to you? Me? NO! That about says it all right there anyway… but there is WAY more. They won’t. You’ll be called a racist in minutes of even beginning THAT debate. Recently the ALABAMA SUPREME COURT PUNTED ON THE ISSUE BY ESSENTIALLY RULING NOT TO RULE ON THE MATTER. Uh, ok… who did they get a visit from? Probably the SAME PEOPLE WHO VISITED JUSTICE STEVENS OF THE SUPREME COURT!

 

Many intervals of the “Birther” investigation are laid out in the post titled: ALABAMA SUPREME COURT PASSES THE BUCK, RULES “NO OPINION” IN OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE. I suggest taking a look before you say anything stupid. The most damning of the links in my opinion is: SHERIFF ARPAIO’S LEAD INVESTIGATOR DROPS BOMB ON WHITE HOUSE. At some point, even with liberals, common sense simply has to prevail. Truthfully, the “Birther” issue is far from the minds of most conservatives these days. TREASON is a word heard much more frequently. The birth certificate is old news. 

 

IF CONGRESS KNOWS, WHY HAVEN’T THEY DONE ANYTHING THEN?

 

 

What a great question! I’m glad you asked. If you read my post titled: CONGRESS NOT NEEDED! OBAMA MUST BE ARRESTED FOR IMPERSONATING A PUBLIC OFFICER, you will find the following:

 

The fact is that Obama is illegitimate and any attempt to impeach him would be an unlawful attempt to validate his “presidency” — nothing can be done to validate him as “the President,” so he cannot be lawfully impeached… If the House of Representatives unlawfully impeaches Obama, then they will also say that everything Obama has signed is legal. If the House acknowledges that Obama is a USURPER and therefore cannot be impeached, they will for the first time be formally acknowledging the fact that Obama has USURPED the Office of the President.

 

Congress has been avoiding the word “USURPER,” because they knew he was ineligible in 2008 and 2012 when they counted the electoral votes without objecting to his ineligibility. For the members of Congress to come to the conclusion now that Obama is a usurper would be like putting the rope around their own necks. DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH FOR THIS ONE!

 

Our Constitution specifically provides that a president can be impeached. It does NOT provide for the impeachment of a usurper. Obviously a usurper is NOT a president. Dr. Vieira in Thought Must Precede Action states:

 

“Although Mr. Obama may have succeeded in gaining PHYSICAL ACCESS to the office-space a legitimate President of the United States occupies in the White House, he never acquired LEGAL ACCESS to “the Office of President,” because, not being “a natural born Citizen,” he was NEVER CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE, and is not now eligible, for that “Office”. For Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution declares (in pertinent part) that “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen * * * shall be eligible to the Office of President”. If words have any meaning, a “Person” whom the supreme law of the land declares not to be “eligible to the Office of President” can never “gain access to” that “Office” in the sense of legally holding it or asserting any claim to it.”

 

Definition of “Office”

 

“Office” is defined to be a right to exercise a public or private employment, and to take the fees and emoluments thereunto belonging.

 

NOTE: We KNOW that Obama’s father was never an American citizen, so the evidence proves that Obama is not a natural born Citizen and therefore he does not have the right to be a president of the United States of America. We need go no further to prove that Barack Hussein Obama II was never constitutionally eligible, and is not now eligible for the “Office of the President.”

 

FINALLY, IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHO IS IN THE OVAL OFFICE:

 

• Letter to the President of the United States – Senior Chief Geoff Ross USN 
• THE BEGINNING: Valerie Jarrett Exposed
• PART I: The Russians Are Coming!
• PART II: Putin, Obama, & The Banksters vs. All of Humanity
• PART III: How & Why Behind Obama’s Rise to the Presidency
• Barack Obama Admits to Being Born in Kenya 

  

[This is the fifth in a series of coordinated open letters since MAY 2014 designed to harness the national powers of Congress, American citizens, and a Boehner -Attorney Gowdy -O’Reilly political-media leadership to arrest Barry Soetoro for his Congress-and-reverse-discrimination-enabled presidential ID felonies and his foreign sympathy crimes against America].

 

All I want for Christmas 2015 is for America to see, on tunnel vision television, the spectacle of Paul Irving, US House Sergeant at Arms, approach you in the Oval Office, read you a US House-prepared statement of your crimes against America, then handcuff you and lead you off to a DC jail to begin your test for drugs/full life history identification/prosecution for treason/sentencing/execution of sentences.    

 

 

You and your enablers have conscientiously denied your full identity (ID) to some 318,000,000 Americans; and this premeditated robbery of The People’s presidential knowledge, this “Ignorance is Power”, will never be tolerated as such vigorous ID cover-up is indicative that you and your closest supporters know that you were never eligible to be a Constitutional President. As such, you remain a powerless covered-up fraud-ID “President” whose entire career under oath can only be rendered Constitutionally NULL and VOID as Congress has no Constitutional authority that would empower it to accept and fund any Presidential directives and Executive Orders from any president whom they know is not a Constitutional President!  Will the newly elected Republican Congressmen be stopped on the capitol steps in DC and be instructed by Boehner and McConnell to join them in continuing to cover-up your Constitutional ineligibility from legal Americans? Or will they revolt against this ID cover-up?

 

You are a covered-up Indonesian Muslim citizen and not a legal “natural-born [American] Citizen”; you are a former foreign exchange student, a cocaine-stained-brain adulterous homosexual with a felonious multi-layered computer-generated “birth certificate” posted on tax-paid-for whitehouse.gov!  

 

You have intentionally harmed and humiliated the United States of America with an endless parade of treasonous actions while political-media leaders stand by or actively assist. You have revealed yourself to be Public Enemy No. 1 to America’s personal freedoms, personal safety, and national security. As a supposed Constitutional scholar, you lied on your Illinois attorney application by stating that you had no former name of “Barry Soetoro.”  You are a foreign-sponsored Islamic operative attempting to control America’s collective thinking while improvising a tyranny of martial law, followed by the tyranny of highway-or-die-way sharia law, as reluctant alternatives to all-out Titanic panic national anarchy.

 

You are a carefully marketed product from an unholy alliance of unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, David Axelrod (whose dad committed gun-assisted suicide) and yourself (whose narrative dad committed car-assisted suicide at age 46, an angry drunkard who left behind some four wives and eight children.)

 

Since you were only in the presence of your visiting narrative Kenyan dad for a few weeks at age 10, your confusing life history in Dreams from My Father should be re-titled Father from My Dreams! Let history record that all you three clever anarchists ever did in this world was suck off American exceptionalism and trample on America’s flag at the same time!

 

The Mother of all your Lies to Americans is that you are our Constitutional President; and this lie is protected by the syndicated dereliction of duty and the Omerta-like silence of the nation’s oath-taking, tax-taking Congress (Speaker Boehner in particular), by the tipped-off prejudiced Courts (the Alabama Case in particular), by the complicit US military leaders (LTC Terrance Lakin’s court-martial in particular), by the biased corporate mainstream media, and by the racist Executive Branch of the federal government ( you and Contempt-of-Congress Holder in particular) and by other complicit associations.

 

It remains the rightful Constitutional duty of every legal American Citizen to remove any so-called President who acts to ignore his oath of office to faithfully execute the laws of Congress, who offers aid and moral support to America’s sworn enemies, and who actively, consciously, and insolently usurps the centuries-old duties and legal constraints of the Office of the President of the United States to perform, instead, as a disengaged crackpot (also see this).

 

Today’s deliberate Democratic stonewalling, dove-tailed with Republican foot-dragging, is intended to promote your criminal rule until 2017. So, your immediate arrest and removal, by any appropriate means, is the only path to return to secure rational national sovereignty.

 

“A lawless head-of-state can only lead to a lawless body politic!” – J Mooers 2014

 

Within our God-provided universe (+ 13 billion years old), transported and subsisting upon our God-provided planet Earth, living within our involuntary God-provided bodies, the only thing we humans control in this world is our thinking. I think, therefore, I am. - Descartes

 

In the universe of things, Barry, you are no more significant than a pondering ant; you are only a single body that is 70% water within a sea of humanity. Living in 2014 with your fraudulent identity covered-up by a virtual propaganda press, you are wrongly enabled to be the keeper of the keys of America’s nuclear arsenal; and you are Congressionally-enabled by EO 13489 to act outside the supreme law of the land (the US Constitution) while you conscientiously work to harm America’s body politic with your willful imposition of your innate foreign sympathies. This is wholly unacceptable.

 

Barry Soetoro-Obama, since you can never be a Constitutional President, you yourself cannot even pass E-verify,  and you are the target of a formal deportation petition, you and your leading sponsor, Nancy Pelosi (a political whore whose actions align with those of Mary Surratt and whose arrogance approaches that of  Elena Ceaușescu), will be making yourselves candidates for the gallows  for assassination of domestic fidelity, national security, and Constitutional correctness. Your continued failure to uphold representative Constitutional requirements is the modern-day equivalent of TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION, and our guilt-locked Congress has no Constitutional alternative except to defund and de-power your usurpation of the Oval Office!

THE ONLY SOLUTION IS REVOLUTION...

RRR

FROM http://www.thelastgreatstand.com/lgs/

Hillary Clinton and Obama Gun Running in Libya. DETAILES EXPOSED.. YET THEY REMAIN FREE!! ARREST THEM NOW. SHARE!

The Obama White House and the State Department under the directive and  management of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “changed sides in the war on terror” in 2011 by implementing a policy of facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated rebel militias in Libya attempting to oust Moammar Gadhafi from power, the Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded in its interim report.

General Petraeus at CIA was ordered to support this mission.
Obama cleans house to stall inquiries into scandals
Just two days after President Obama’s re-election, General David Petraeus, the CIA Director, has resigned from the administration over an extramarital affair. Petraeus was slated to testify before Congress next week on the murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, in Benghazi.

Now that the Obama administration has succeeded in winning a second term, they are cleaning house. The two figures most linked to the disaster in Benghazi, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Petraeus, are gone. The figure most linked with Fast and Furious, Eric Holder, will be gone. The figure most linked to the administration’s economic failures, Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner, will be gone.

Bret Baier of Fox News just tweeted, “With Petraeus’ resignation effective immediately, he will not testify next week & lawmakers are said to be ‘stunned’ by the announcement.”
He sent a letter to his colleagues stating:
Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked the President to be allowed, for personal reasons, to resign from my position. After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours …
This afternoon, the President graciously accepted my resignation.
President Obama issued this statement:
David Petraeus has provided extraordinary service to the United States for decades. By any measure, he was one of the outstanding General officers of his generation, helping our military adapt to new challenges, and leading our men and women in uniform through a remarkable period of service in Iraq and Afghanistan, where he helped our nation put those wars on a path to a responsible end. As Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, he has continued to serve with characteristic intellectual rigor, dedication, and patriotism. By any measure, through his lifetime of service David Petraeus has made our country safer and stronger.
Today, I accepted his resignation as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. I am completely confident that the CIA will continue to thrive and carry out its essential mission, and I have the utmost confidence in Acting Director Michael Morell and the men and women of the CIA who work every day to keep our nation safe. Going forward, my thoughts and prayers are with Dave and Holly Petraeus, who has done so much to help military families through her own work. I wish them the very best at this difficult time.
This is only the latest in a string of groundshaking events demonstrating that the Obama administration hid information vital to the American people during the last days of the 2012 election cycle. The fact that the most respected soldier of his generation, Petraeus, would be leaving the administration during an Obama second term, had to be known by the White House prior to the election. And they said nothing in order to run out the clock.
The fact that Attorney General Eric Holder was considering stepping down from the administration had to be known by the White House prior to the election. Meanwhile, during the election cycle, the Obama administration claimed executive privilege in order to shield Holder from questions about Fast and Furious.
The fact that an American drone was fired upon in international airspace by Iranian airplanes was hidden from the American public for a week in order to prevent the American public from recognizing the failure of the Obama Iranian foreign policy.

The facts in Benghazi were lied about by virtually every member of the Obama administration for weeks upon weeks.

The fact that the administration had been slow-walking reams of vital regulation to beyond the election in order to avoid scaring off voters was hidden from the public.
Now that the Obama administration has succeeded in winning a second term, they began cleaning house. The two figures most linked to the disaster in Benghazi, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Petraeus, are gone.

The figure most linked with Fast and Furious, Eric Holder, will be gone. The figure most linked to the administration’s economic failures, Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner, will be gone.

Only Obama remains. He ran out the clock on his scandals, and now throws anyone associated with them overboard.
The Petraeus resignation is only the most recent evidence that the Obama administration will lie to the American people to achieve its ends. But with all of his experts gone, Obama’s cabinet will now be staffed by the political C team in a time of crisis, both domestically and internationally

Now you can see why the Obama Cabal went into "Bullshit Mode" with the BOGUS Mohammed Video story. Susan Rice is also complicit. She was rewarded for her Loyalty to the regime.

The CIA station chief in Libya told his superiors that no protest occurred before the attack on the consulate in Benghazi.
This clearly implicates the White House and Susan Rice with misrepresenting the truth to the American public.
Obama lackey Susan Rice told five different news organizations that the Benghazi attack started as a protest over an obscure YouTube video. This was not true.
The Washington Times reported:

Before the Obama administration gave an inaccurate narrative on national television that the Benghazi attacks grew from an anti-American protest, the CIA’s station chief in Libya pointedly told his superiors in Washington that no such demonstration occurred, documents and interviews with current and former intelligence officials show.
The attack was “not an escalation of protests,” the station chief wrote to then-Deputy CIA Director Michael J. Morell in an email dated Sept. 15, 2012 — a full day before the White House sent Susan E. Rice to several Sunday talk shows to disseminate talking points claiming that the Benghazi attack began as a protest over an anti-Islam video.
That the talking points used by Mrs. Rice, who was then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, were written by a CIA that ignored the assessment by its own station chief inside Libya, has emerged as one of the major bones of contention in the more than two years of political fireworks and congressional investigations into the Benghazi attack.
What has never been made public is whether Mr. Morell and others at the CIA explicitly shared the station chief’s assessment with the White House or State Department.
Two former intelligence officials have told The Washington Times that this question likely will be answered at a Wednesday hearing of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence during which Mr. Morell is scheduled to give his public testimony.

In WND interviews, several members of the commission have disclosed their finding that the mission of Christopher Stevens, prior to the fall of Gadhafi and during Stevens’ time as U.S. ambassador, was the management of a secret gun-running program operated out of the Benghazi compound.
The Obama administration’s gun-running project in Libya, much like the “fast and furious” program under Eric Holder’s Justice Department, operated without seeking or obtaining authorization by Congress.
WND reported Monday that in exclusive interviews conducted with 11 of the 17 members of the commission, it is clear that while the CCB is still enthusiastic to work with Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, and hopeful that Boehner is serious about the investigation, various members of the CCB, speaking on their own behalf and not as spokesmen for the commission, are expressing concerns, wanting to make sure the Gowdy investigation is not compromised by elements within the GOP.
The Citizen’s Commission on Benghazi’s interim report, in a paragraph titled “Changing sides in the War on Terror,” alleges “the U.S. was fully aware of and facilitating the delivery of weapons to the Al Qaeda-dominated rebel militias throughout the 2011 rebellion.”
The report asserted the jihadist agenda of AQIM, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Islamic terror groups represented among the rebel forces was well known to U.S. officials responsible for Libya policy.
“The rebels made no secret of their Al Qaeda affiliation, openly flying and speaking in front of the black flag of Islamic jihad, according to author John Rosenthal and multiple media reports,” the interim report said. “And yet, the White House and senior Congressional members deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress Al Qaeda.”
The report concluded: “The result in Libya, across much of North Africa, and beyond has been utter chaos, disruption of Libya’s oil industry, the spread of dangerous weapons (including surface-to-air missiles), and the empowerment of jihadist organizations like Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.”
Christopher Stevens: ’1st U.S. envoy to al-Qaida’
In the WND interviews, several members of the citizens’ commission, speaking for themselves, not for the commission, added important background to the interim report’s conclusion.
“In early 2011, before Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship, and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’ which basically means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,” explained Clare Lopez, a member of the commission who served as a career operations officer with the CIA and current is vice president for research at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy.
“At that time, Stevens was facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-related militia in Libya,” Lopez continued. “The weapons were produced at factories in Eastern Europe and shipped to a logistics hub in Qatar. The weapons were financed by the UAE and delivered via Qatar mostly on ships, with some possibly on airplanes, for delivery to Benghazi. The weapons were small arms, including Kalashnikovs, rocket-propelled grenades and lots of ammunition.”

Lopez further explained that during the period of time when Stevens was facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-affiliated militia in Libya, he was living in the facility that was later designated the Special Mission Compound in Benghazi.
“This was about weapons going into Libya, and Stevens is coordinating with Abdelhakim Belhadj, the leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, other al-Qaida-affiliated militia leaders and leaders of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood that directed the rebellion against Qadhafi as an offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood,” Lopez said. “Many of the individual members of the al-Qaida-related militias, including the LIFG, and the groups that would later become Ansar Al-Sharia, were Muslim Brotherhood members first.”
According to the interim report, as detailed by Lopez, a delegation from the UAE traveled to Libya after the fall of Gadhafi to collect payment for the weapons the UAE had financed and that Qatar had delivered to the TNC during the war.
“The UAE delegation was seeking $1 billion it claimed was owed,” the interim report noted. “During their visit to Tripoli, the UAE officials discovered that half of the $1 billion worth of weapons it had financed for the rebels had, in fact, been diverted by Mustafa Abdul Jalil, the Muslim Brotherhood head of the Libyan TNC, and sold to Qaddafi.”
According to information discovered during the UAE visit to Tripoli, when Jalil learned that Maj. Gen. Abdel Fatah Younis, Gadhafi’s former minister of the interior before his late February 2011 defection to the rebel forces, had found out about the weapons diversion and the $500 million payment from Gadhafi, Jalil ordered Abu Salim Abu Khattala, leader of the Abu Obeida Bin al-Jarrah brigade to kill Younis.
“Abu Khattala, later identified as a Ansar al- Shariah commander who participated in the 11 September 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, accepted the orders and directed the killing of Gen. Younis in July 2011,” the interim report noted.
Abu Khattala is currently in custody in New York awaiting trial under a Department of Justice-sealed indictment, after U.S. Delta Force special operations personnel captured him over the weekend of June 14-15, 2014, in a covert mission in Libya. Abu Khattala’s brigade merged into Ansar al-Shariah in 2012, and he was positively identified to the FBI in a cell phone photo from the scene of the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.
The language of the interim report made clear why the sequence of events is important.
“The key significance of this episode is the demonstration of a military chain-of-command relationship between the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood leadership of the TNC and the Al Qaeda-affiliated militia (Ansar al-Shariah) that has been named responsible for the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi,” the interim Rreport concluded.
“What we have here is the Muslim Brotherhood leadership of the revolution giving a kill order to a Muslim militia affiliated with al-Qaida, which then carried it out,” Lopez summarized. “This chain-of-command link is important even though it has not yet received enough attention in the media.
A big ‘oh no’ moment
“After Gadhafi is deposed and Stevens was appointed U.S. ambassador to Libya, the flow of weapons reverses,” Lopez noted. “Now Stevens has the job of overseeing the shipment of arms from Libya to Syria to arm the rebels fighting Assad, some of whom ultimately become al-Nusra in Syria and some become ISIS.”
Lopez distinguished that “al-Nusra in Syria still claims allegiance to al-Qaida, while ISIS has broken away from al-Qaida, not because ISIS is too violent, but out of insubordination, after Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, wanted to run his own show inside Syria as well as Iraq, thereby disobeying orders from al-Qaida leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri.”
She noted that in this period of time, after the fall of Gadhafi and before the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the Benghazi compound, Stevens was working with Turkey to ship weapons out of Libya into Syria for the use of the rebels fighting Assad.
According to the authors of the bestselling book “13 Hours,” on Sept. 11, 2012, before the attack on the Benghazi compound started, Stevens had dinner with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin. Stevens reportedly escorted the Turkish diplomat outside the main gate of the Benghazi compound to say good-bye to Akin at approximately 7:40 p.m. local time, before he returned to Villa C to retire for the evening.
Kevin Shipp, a former CIA counterintelligence expert who worked on the seventh floor at Langley as protective staff to then-CIA Director William Casey, again speaking for himself in his interview with WND, agreed with Lopez that the gun-running operation Stevens managed is a secret the Obama White House and Clinton State Department have sought to suppress from the public.
“The shocking part, maybe even a violation of international law that the Obama administration has been terrified to have fully revealed, is that Stevens as part of his duties as a State Department employee was assisting in the shipment of arms first into Libya for the al-Qaida-affiliated militia, with the weapons shipped subsequently out of Libya into Syria for use by the al-Qaida-affiliated rebels fighting Assad,” Shipp told WND.
“Very possibly, these gun-running activities could be looked at even as treasonable offenses,” he said.
Shipp further noted that in gun-running operations in which the CIA wants deniability, the CIA generally involves a third party.
“The way the CIA works is through a ‘cut-out,’ in that you get Qatar to transport the weapons and you facilitate the transport. So now the third party is to blame,” he explained.
“Qatar probably would have been able to pull this off without any attribution to the CIA if the Benghazi attack had not happened. The attack basically shed the light on this operation the White House, the State Department and the CIA were trying to keep quiet,” he said.

READ MY OTHER BLOGS FOR THE GUN RUNNING ANGLE..

ONLY REVOLUTION CHANGES THE COURSE OF OUR COUNTRY'S FUTURE

RRR

Obama's Executive orders are actually "Stealth changes in the LAW" that tilts the country slowly towards a Federal Socialist Oligarchy

Barack Hussein Obama and his progressive lefty supporters tout the fact that he’s issued fewer executive orders than other recent presidents, suggesting Republicans are pushing a non-issue about his executive orders.
What is so frustrating to me is that Conservatives and Republicans are so incompetent in explaining why the number of executive orders is irrelevant;

Obama’s orders making new laws and breaking established law. Obama swore when he took the oath ...“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Yes every president issues executive orders, and commentators only open themselves to ridicule if they suggest there’s anything wrong with those orders as such. Presidents issue them to agencies or employees of the executive branch of the federal government–not the American people–regarding how to carry out specific duties or programs.  Obama's Executive orders are actually "Stealth changes in the LAW" that tilts the country slowly towards a Federal Socialist Oligarchy

WE ARE LIKE THIS FROG IN A POT OF BOILING WATER
 

The Take Care Clause of the Constitution in Article II commands each president to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” So long as he issues orders specifically directing his subordinates on how to administer or enforce some aspect of federal law, he’s fulfilling his constitutional duty.
But two things executive orders cannot do: They cannot make law, and they cannot stop laws from being carried out. This is where Obama is taking what may be unprecedented steps in violation of the Constitution.


For example, refusing to prosecute a class of drug crimes is failing to enforce the law as Congress wrote it. If laws such as the different punishments for powder cocaine versus crack cocaine are unjustified, then it is up to the Congress–the lawmaking branch of government–to decide whether to change that law.

Or voter intimidation. The Black Panthers intimidated white voters in Philadelphia in 2008. The federal government under the Bush administration won a court judgment against some of those responsible. When Obama took over, he ordered the Justice Department to drop the matter by not filing the final papers, even though the case was already won. 

Or Obamacare’s employer mandate, which Congress specified in the Affordable Care Act went into effect on Jan. 1, 2014. The impact was going to be politically disastrous for Democrats in the midterm elections, so Obama announced in a speech that the IRS would not enforce that provision of the ACA until 2015. 

Those are three of many instances of not enforcing the law; sometimes Obama puts it in a formal executive order, other times not. (For example, he had the employer mandate suspension announced by an assistant treasury secretary in a blog post.)

Even worse, some of Obama’s executive orders actually make substantive public policy. In other words, they actually make new law without Congress. 

Obama’s DACA program (not deporting “Dreamers”) is an example. He’s not just failing to enforce immigration law. Instead he’s created a new federal program, designating illegal aliens into four different categories and establishing new criteria for who can indefinitely stay in the United States and who cannot. 

Another is Obama’s executive order that organizations who do not support the LGBT agenda under the rubric of “nondiscrimination” cannot receive a business contract with the federal government. As a consequence, if Hobby Lobby or any other business wholly owned and operated by observant Evangelicals, Catholics, Mormons, Orthodox Jews, or even Muslims, denies spousal benefits to same-sex partners, or doesn’t want to bake wedding cakes for gay-marriage receptions, the federal government can refuse to do business with them. 

Frankly, even if Congress passed such a law it should be held unconstitutional under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The unconstitutional-conditions doctrine provides that no American can be required to forfeit their rights in order to do business with the federal government.
So even Congress cannot do this, but Obama did it anyway. 

Or again with Obamacare. Evidently to push back its job-killing effects, Obama has announced that he’s delaying the employer mandate yet again, but only for some businesses. 

Congress specified that companies with 50 or more full-time employees are subject to the mandate to offer health insurance. But Obama announced that for 2015 he’ll not enforce it against companies with 50 to 99 employees, but he will enforce it for 100 or more. 

That’s essentially making new law. Congress specified that the mandate starts at 50. Obama is essentially rewriting the law by saying it starts at 100. Congress can change that number at any time, but the president can never change it. 

Yet Conservatives and Republicans fail to make this simple point:

“It makes no difference whether he issues fewer orders than past presidents. They issued orders about how to follow the law, but he’s issuing orders not to follow the law.”

HERE ARE SOME Violations of Law By HUSSEIN Obama and His Administration

1. Obama Administration uses IRS to target conservative, Christian and pro-Israel organizations, donors, and citizens.
   
2. In an unprecedented attack on the First Amendment, the Obama Justice Department ordered criminal investigations of FOX News reporters for doing their jobs during the 2012 election year.
   
3. President Obama, throughout his Presidency, has refused to enforce long-established U.S. immigration laws. For example . . .
   
   • More than 300,000 captured illegal aliens had been processed and were awaiting deportation. But, incredibly, Obama stopped these deportations and ordered the U.S. border patrol to release many of these illegal aliens in violation of law and without explanation.
   • Congress rejected Obama's so called DREAM ACT – which would have granted permanent residency to many illegal aliens. So Obama enacted his own version of the DREAM ACT by Executive Order, thus directly defying Congress. According to Obama's Executive Order, illegal aliens can stay in America if they are under the age of 30, have been in America for at least five years, are enrolled in school or have graduated from high school, and have committed no felonies.
4. Obama has refused to build a double-barrier security fence along the U.S.-Mexican border in direct violation of the 2006 Secure Fence Act. This law requires that "at least two layers of reinforced fencing" be built along America's 650-mile border with Mexico. So far, just 40 miles of this fence have been built – most of it during the Bush Administration.
   
5. Obama's unconstitutional assault on your Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
   President Obama issued, in one day, 21 separate Executive Orders that attack and undermine your Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
   Especially egregious is President Obama's Executive Orders amending the ObamaCare law to allow doctors and hospitals to investigate which patients own a gun. This outrageous Executive Order could allow the federal government to track and monitor law-abiding gun owners simply because they sought medical care.
   
6. Obama's assault on Christians and religious freedom.
   Obama's Health and Human Services Department has, on its own (without Congressional approval), issued a mandate that all health insurance plans must include coverage for abortion-inducing drugs. As a result, pro-life employers and taxpayers are now effectively required by law to pay for abortions.
   This mandate is an unconstitutional attack on the protections for freedom of religion and freedom of conscience in the First Amendment and the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act. This mandate also directly violates the ObamaCare law enacted by Congress, which prohibits any and all taxpayer funds from being used to pay for abortions.
   
7. Obama forced ObamaCare on an unwilling public through bribery and lying about its cost.
   Obama managed to secure passage of ObamaCare by one vote in the Senate by bribing senators. He bribed Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska with the notorious "Cornhusker Kickback." He bribed Senator Mary Landrieu with the infamous $300 million "Louisiana Purchase."
   In addition, Obama knowingly and blatantly lied to America and to Congress about how much ObamaCare would really cost. The cost of ObamaCare to the American people over the next 10 years will not be less than $1 TRILLION, as Obama promised in his nationally televised speech to the nation. Instead, the real cost of ObamaCare to the Federal Treasury is $2.4 TRILLION, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.
   But the true cost of ObamaCare is more like $10 TRILLION when you factor in the cost to the states, the cost to individual Americans who are now required to purchase Obama-approved health plans (the "Individual Mandate"), the cost of exploding health insurance premiums, the $716 billion ObamaCare steals from Medicare, and the increased cost to businesses of complying with ObamaCare mandates.
   
8. Operation Fast & Furious.
   "Operation Fast & Furious" was the Obama Administration's gun-running scheme that put thousands of American-made semi-automatic weapons in the hands of Mexican drug cartels and resulted in the death of at least one U.S. Border Patrol Agent, Brian Terry. Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress and the public, claiming he didn't know about his Justice Department's Fast & Furious operation.
   Congress has now held Holder in contempt for defying congressional subpoenas and refusing to turn over thousands of Justice Department documents on Fast & Furious. President Obama asserted Executive Privilege to try to protect Holder. But for Executive Privilege to apply, Obama would have had to have known about Fast & Furious, making the President as culpable as Holder.
   Investigators suspect that Fast & Furious was an effort by the Obama Administration to discredit lawful gun ownership in America by purposefully creating gun crimes, thus inducing public outcry for gun control. When it put thousands of semi-automatic weapons in the hands of Mexican drug cartels, the Obama Justice Department knew these guns would be used to commit crimes, perhaps even kill some Americans. Then Obama could say: "See how dangerous these guns are. We must ban them."
   
9. "Federal Communications Commission (FCC): Regulated the Internet despite a court order from the Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. stating that the FCC does not have the power to regulate the Internet." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
   
10. "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Imposed Cross-State Air Pollution Rules on the state of Texas at the last minute and without an opportunity for Texas to respond to the proposed regulation. EPA overreach was based on a dubious claim that air pollution from Texas affected a single air-quality monitor in Granite City, Illinois more than 500 miles and three states away from Texas." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
11. "Department of Justice (DOJ): Rejected state voter ID statutes that are similar to those already approved by the Supreme Court of the United States. DOJ ignored section 8 of the Voting Rights Act which calls for protections against voter fraud, and used section 5 to administratively block measures to protect the integrity of elections passed by state legislatures." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
12. "DOJ: In violation of 10th Amendment, sued to prevent Arizona from using reasonable measures to discourage illegal immigration within its borders. Arizona has a large number of illegal immigrants, compared to other states, and needs to be able to act to reduce the number." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
13. "DOJ: Went to court to stop enforcement of Alabama's immigration reform laws, which require collection of the immigration status of public school students, require businesses to use E-Verify, and prohibit illegal immigrants from receiving public benefits." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
14. "White House: Made "recess appointments" to the National Labor Relations Board and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau when Congress was NOT in recess. The Obama Administration has ignored the ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that the appointments are unconstitutional." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
15. "Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC): Interfered with a Michigan church's selection of its own ministers by trying to force the church to reinstate a minister who was discharged for her disagreement with the religious doctrine of the church." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
16. "Department of Energy (DOE): In 2009, the Obama Administration arbitrarily broke federal law, violated various contracts, and derailed the most studied energy project in American history at Yucca Mountain by denying it a license, thus costing the American people more than $31 billion." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
17. Department of the Interior (DOI): Forced Glendale, a family-oriented town in Arizona, to become another Las Vegas against its will by granting "reservation status" to a 54-acre plot in the town, where the Tohono O'odham Indian Nation plans to build a resort and casino." (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
    
18. Without Congressional approval, Obama gutted the work requirement for welfare recipients passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
    
19. In the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler, Obama illegally shortchanged bond holders in favor of Labor Unions, despite U.S. bankruptcy laws that specify that bond holders be first in line to be paid back.
    
20. Eager to use the killing of Osama bin Laden for political gain, Obama exposed the identity and method of operation of the Navy SEALs team that conducted the operation in Pakistan, thus exposing its members to a lifetime of risk because they have been targeted for assassination by Islamists. A short time after Obama exposed the Navy SEALs' method of operation, 22 SEALs were shot down and killed in Afghanistan. It is a violation of law for the President or any American to reveal classified military secrets.
    
21. President Obama established an extra-constitutional top secret "kill list" of people (including Americans) who can be summarily killed on sight – presumably by drones -- without due process. Once on Obama's kill list, an American citizen can be targeted and executed on the opinion of a single government bureaucrat. That's not how our legal system is supposed to work.
    
22. Obama Administration officials twisted the arms of defense contractors to not issue layoff notices in October of 2012 so as to avoid causing bad news for Obama right before the election — even though federal law (the "WARN Act") requires such notices. ; Not only is this a violation of the WARN Act, it's also an unlawful use of federal officials for campaign purposes.
    
23. President Obama intervened militarily in Libya in 2011 without the Congressional approval required by the War Powers Act.
    
24. Obama knowingly lied to Congress and the American people about the killing of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya. The President and his representatives repeatedly said an anti-Islamic video sparked a spontaneous uprising in Libya that resulted in the killings even though Obama knew that the attack was a well-planned military-style assault by al Qaeda on the anniversary of September 11.
    
25. Michelle Obama's family trip to Africa in June of 2011, including a private safari at a South African game reserve, cost American taxpayers $424,000 for air travel alone. Mrs. Obama brought along both her makeup artist and hairstylist, as well as her mother, a niece and nephew, and her daughters, who were listed as "senior staff members."
    
    THIS LIST IS ENDLESS... BUT SERVES THE POINT...
    
    ONLY REVOLUTION CAN CHANGE THE COURSE OF OUR HISTORY. WE ARE CAREENING TOWARDS A FEDERAL OLIGARCHY..
    
    Our Government is longer in power because of the "Consent of the Governed"...
    

    Consent of the Governed

     

    

    The Declaration of Independence says, “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” This means that government gets all its power from the people. The people set up the government.
    The people run the government. The government does not run the people. If people don’t like the government, they have the right to change it.
    
    Consider this...
    One question after another comes to mind. Must every person consent? If not, how many must, and what options do those who do not consent have? What form must the consent take — verbal, written, explicit, implicit? If implicit, how is it to be registered? Given that the composition of society is constantly changing, owing to births, deaths, and international migration, how often must the rulers confirm that they retain the consent of the governed? And so on and on. Political legitimacy, it would appear, presents a multitude of difficulties when we move from the realm of theoretical abstraction to that of practical realization.
    I raise this question because, in regard to the so-called social contract, I have often had occasion to protest that I haven't even seen the contract, much less been asked to consent to it. A valid contract requires voluntary offer, acceptance, and consideration. I've never received an offer from my rulers, so I certainly have not accepted one; and rather than consideration, I have received nothing but contempt from the rulers, who, notwithstanding the absence of any agreement, have indubitably threatened me with grave harm in the event that I fail to comply with their edicts.
    What monumental effrontery these people exhibit! What gives them the right to rob me and push me around? It certainly is not my desire to be a sheep for them to shear or slaughter as they deem expedient for the attainment of their own ends.
    Moreover, when we flesh out the idea of "consent of the governed" in realistic detail, the whole notion quickly becomes utterly preposterous. Just consider how it would work. A would-be ruler approaches you and offers a contract for your approval. Here, says he, is the deal.
    

    I, the party of the first part ("the ruler"), promise:
    (1) To stipulate how much of your money you will hand over to me, as well as how, when, and where the transfer will be made. You will have no effective say in the matter, aside from pleading for my mercy, and if you should fail to comply, my agents will punish you with fines, imprisonment, and (in the event of your persistent resistance) death.
    (2) To make thousands upon thousands of rules for you to obey without question, again on pain of punishment by my agents. You will have no effective say in determining the content of these rules, which will be so numerous, complex, and in many cases beyond comprehension that no human being could conceivably know about more than a handful of them, much less their specific character; yet if you should fail to comply with any of them, I will feel free to punish you to the extent of a law made by me and my confederates.
    (3) To provide for your use, on terms stipulated by me and my agents, so-called public goods and services. Although you may actually place some value on a few of these goods and services, most will have little or no value to you, and some you will find utterly abhorrent, and in no event will you as an individual have any effective say over the goods and services I provide, notwithstanding any economist's cock-and-bull story to the effect that you "demand" all this stuff and value it at whatever amount of money I choose to expend for its provision.
    (4) In the event of a dispute between us, judges beholden to me for their appointment and salaries will decide how to settle the dispute. You can expect to lose in these settlements, if your case is heard at all.
    In exchange for the foregoing government "benefits," you, the party of the second part ("the subject"), promise:
    (5) To shut up, make no waves, obey all orders issued by the ruler and his agents, kowtow to them as if they were important, honorable people, and when they say "jump," ask only "how high?"

    Such a deal! Can we really imagine that any sane person would consent to it?
    
    
    
    
                    This is where we are today people!!
    
    RRR