HILLARY CAMP BUSTED AGAIN..Polling Numbers are a scam. NBC Pollsters paid by Hillary. Please read understand and share it.

THE CLINTON MEDIA MACHINE (NBC & WALL STREET JOURNAL ) WHICH HAS BEEN TOTALLY CORRUPTED  ARE NOW FUDGING THE POLLS TOO.

LIES DECEIT CORRUPTION NOW IN POLLING TOO!

WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT FRAUDULENT POLLS ONLY MAKES US STRONGER AND MORE DETERMINED TO COME OUT AND VOTE.

BUT SERIOUSLY THE FRAUD IS BREATHTAKING!

Now lets take this polling business and deconstruct it so you know how to evaluate it.

1. To poll someone to get their opinion you have to get their names from voter roles which means they would have to have voted before in a Presidential Election...like in 2012?
( as you know Donald Trump has brought almost 13 Million New Voters to vote in 2016 ..New as in never have voted before so they are never polled! These people bring a 8% advantage to Trump. Then there are the Blacks who will vote for Trump add another 3-5% for Trump)

2. The Poll has to be done with a reasonable number of voters representing a reasonable cross section of the electorate. Percentage of Democrats, Republicans, Independents
( If you skew the percentage of these groups and take a small sample, then you get a skewed result)



3. The Questions asked are a way to bias the answers of the people being polled. 
4. The real polls should take into account "likely voters" who are motivated to vote. To evaluate that all you need to see is the size of the Donald Trump Rallies and compare them with the Hillary Clinton crowds of paid union craigslist paid crowds.

SO BASED ON THAT I URGE PEOPLE NOT TO REACT TO THE POLLS WHICH ARE DONE TO CREATE A PSYCHOLOGICAL ATTACK ON TRUMP SUPPORTERS.


Now...what you are about to read (and see) below is a fully cited example of something I have discussed frequently on my facebook page. The lefty media will try to obfuscate the facts but as you and I know and Donald Trump has said again and again...THEY ARE COMPLETE FRAUDS


THIS WILL EXPOSE THE WHOLE DAMN FRAUD OF POLLING THE WAY THE CORRUPT HILLARY SCHILLING MEDIA IS DOING IT.

Why do you think they are doing it? Its because they all stand for the same long term goal. THE NEW GLOBAL SOCIALIST OLIGARCHY.

Everything below is fully linked and cited. DO THE FACT CHECKING IS YOU WANT. ITS ALL TRUE.

You have probably seen the latest example of the media claiming a released presidential poll from NBC and The Wall Street Journal as an example of Hillary Clinton expanding to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the “controversial” leaked tape of Donald Trump.

First of all remember that NBC is a Obama Propaganda arm along with its cable entity MSNBC.

The Wall Street Journal is a corrupt PRO BIG BUSINESS NEWS PAPER OWNED BY RUPERT MURDOCH who despises Donald Trump. The Wall Street Journal is also a Group that advocates open borders since1984.
See Story... http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/28/rupert-murdochs-open-borders-wall-street-journal-warns-bad-sign-trump-is-following-jeff-sessions-lead/
The claim that Hillary Clinton expanding her lead to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the “controversial” leaked tape of Donald Trump.is complete and utter nonsense.

Here’s the proof.
We begin with a google search showing hundreds of gleeful and almost masturbatory excitement in media citations referencing the NBC/WSJ Poll:

And here’s the NBC link to the poll, and the NBC Link to the pdf of the poll, and the NBC Poll itself in a scribed pdf:

View this document on Scribd

Transparently the poll is manipulated with:

a) a small sample (500); and 
b) the following ideological make-up:

♦ Republican and Republican leaners 36%
♦ Democrat and Democrat leaners 43%
♦ Independents 12%

By itself that ideological snapshot is silly. 

Nationally the party registration is roughly 
27% (R), 
32% (D), and 
40% (I) – SEE HERE – 

However, the polling sample is the least of the issues for this deconstruction.

Arguing about the construct or methodology of the poll is typically what most people do when they are refuting a media poll.  

That aspect alone is not the big story.
Lets look at who the hell the polling organization is and what their ideology is.

Do you see: Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies?

Hart Research Associates is headed up by Peter D Hart (founder), and Geoff Garin (President) – SEE HERE

Now look at what role Geoff Garin, Hart Research Associate President, is currently occupying (link here):


OK, so Mr. Geoff Garin, the President of Hart Research and Associates”, is currently working as “a strategic adviser for Priorities USA in support of Hillary Clinton’s election“.  

Gee, I wonder why the CROOKED LYING SACK OF SHIT LEFTY MEDIA HIDES THIS RIGHT??
See the issue?

Wait, we’re not even close to finished.  

It gets better.

Let’s take a look at the recent financial connection between, Geoff Garin, Hart Research Associates and Hillary Clinton’s Priorities USA Super-PAC.

For that information we turn to FEC filings -HERE-.  What do they indicate?

On Page #118 of the September 2016 (most recent) filing we find a payment for $178,500 (screen grab above)

On Page #92 of the same September 2016 (most recent) filing, we find another payment for $42,000 (screen grab below)


♦ $220,500.00 in the month of September alone paid by Hillary Clinton’s Priorities USA Super-PAC to Hart Research Associates.
♦ The President of Hart Research Associates, Geoff Garin, is working for Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
♦ NBC (S Burke) and The WSJ (Murdoch) contact Geoff Garin (Hart Research Associates) for the post-debate poll data they will use on the day following the debate.
SO THEN THE PAID WHORES AT Hart Research Associates provides a small national poll sample (500) result, with skewed party internals, showing Hillary Clinton +11 points.

HILLARY EMAILS SECRETLY TRASHED BLACKS AND MUSLIMS .. WIKILEAKS

Hillary SECRETLY TRASHES African Americans in leaked emails!.

From the email leaked..

"The main reason behind successful immigration should be painfully obvious to even the most dimwitted of observers: Some groups of people are almost always highly successful given only half a chance (Jews*, Hindus/Sikhs and Chinese people, for example), while others (Muslims, blacks** and Roma***, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances."


THE LEFTY MEDIA WILL NOT REPORT THIS.. SO IT IS UP TO US TO EXPOSE THIS TO THE BLACKS SHE TRASHES!

LIST OF REPUBLICAN TURNCOATS WHO PREFER HILLARY TO DONALD TRUMP.

Patriots: These are  Republican Figures who have hidden behind the name of a Republican Party that has lost its balls. These are the list of people who prefer Hillary Clinton in the White House to Donald Trump. 

In other words... these "Fraudulent creatures" prefer

To have Hillary place the next 3 Supreme Court Justices!

To have Hillary place the next 100 or so Federal Judges

To have open Borders where anyone can enter and become a citizen over a short period of time and change the voting dynamic of the country so that only Democarts will be elected as President for the next 100 years.

To have Hillary who has proven that she is a Thief and a Crook.

To have Hillary who attacks women when it serves her purpose.

Hillary Clinton took money from Foreign Governments and padded her own pockets.

OH THE LIST IS LONG.. YOU KNOW .. 

BUT THESE FUCKING ASSHOLES (LISTED BELOW)  WOULD PREFER HILLARY TO WIN THAN DONALD TRUMP BECAUSE HE IS A LOUD MOUTH.

THIS IS THE NEXT GENERATION OF LILY LIVERS COWARDS WHO WANTED A GEORGE PATTON TO BE OUSTED AS GENERAL EVEN THOUGH HE WAS WINNING THE WAR.. WHEN HE DID SOME POLITICALLY INCORRECT THINGS.

The assholes then preferred Germans winning to Patton sweeping through Europe and on to Berlin. So they pulled him out of the war.

History is filled with cowards who will end up in the dustbin and History is filled with Brave men who will be remembered. Does anyone remember the names of the cowardly Congressmen and Politicians who wanted Patton out? Same way when the dust settles...no one will even remember these assholes names!



I WILL ADD MORE TO THIS LIST...

But let us ALL remember. for everyone of these traitors to America... there ate 1,000,000 of us who vote. Their vote only counts for ONE VOTE. The LEFTIST MEDIA WILL HAVE YOU BELIEVE OTHERWISE.

Kelly Ayotte, Senator of New Hampshire

William Bennett, Former secretary of education under Ronald Reagan

Robert Bentley, Governor of Alabama

Jaime Herrera Beutler, Representative of Washington

Bradley Byrne, Representative of Alabama

Jason Chaffetz, Representative of Utah

Mike Coffman, Representative of Colorado

Barbara Comstock, Representative of Virginia

Michael D. Crapo, Senator of Idaho

Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota

Rodney Davis, Representative of Illinois

Carly Fiorina, Former chief executive of Hewlett-Packard and candidate for Republican nomination

Deb Fischer, Senator of Nebraska

Jeff Flake, Senator of Arizona

Jeff Fortenberry, Representative of Nebraska

Darryl Glenn, Running for Senate from Colorado

Cory Gardner, Senator of Colorado

Scott Garrett, Representative of New Jersey

Kay Granger, Representative of Texas

Cresent Hardy, Representative of Nevada

Bill Haslam, Governor of Tennessee

Joe Heck, Representative of Nevada, running for Senate

Gary R. Herbert, Governor of Utah

Jon M. Huntsman Jr., Former governor of Utah

Will Hurd, Representative of Texas

David Jolly, Representative of Florida

John Kasich, Governor of Ohio

John Katko, Representative of New York

Steve Knight, Representative of California

Mike Lee, Senator of Utah

Frank A. LoBiondo, Representative of New Jersey

Mia Love, Representative of Utah

Susana Martinez, Governor of New Mexico

John McCain, Senator of Arizona

Patrick Meehan, Representative of Pennsylvania

Lisa Murkowski, Senator of Alaska

George E. Pataki, Former governor of New York

Erik Paulsen, Representative of Minnesota

Tim Pawlenty, Former governor of Minnesota

Rob Portman, Senator of Ohio

Condoleezza Rice, Former secretary of state under George W. Bush

Martha Roby, Represenative of Alabama

Tom Rooney, Representative of Florida

Brian Sandoval, Governor of Nevada

Arnold Schwarzenegger, Former governor of California

Mike Simpson, Representative of Idaho

Chris Stewart, Representative of Utah

Dan Sullivan, Senator of Alaska

John Thune, Senator of South Dakota and chairman of the Republican Conference

Fred Upton, Representative of Michigan

Ann Wagner, Representative of Missouri

DAMN THEM ALL TO HELL...

Why Paul Ryan does not like Trump. He is married to a Democrat, Dated a "Black Lives Matter" Woman and is for Open Borders!

EXPOSED: PLEASE SHARE ! KNOW THE FACTS!!

 PROOF THAT PAUL RYAN IS A CLOSET DEMOCRAT... OR AT THE VERY LEAST A RINO AND AN ESTABLISHMENT ANTI "WE THE PEOPLE", ANTI TRUMP DWEEB.

EXPOSED! NOTHING BUT FACTS HERE. Read and Share and know why Paul Ryan like so many other Rino Republicans are terrified of Donald Trump.
Now it all makes sense. Nothing is random in life. Its all cause and effect!
He is married to a Democrat, Dated and almost married a "Black Lives Matter" Woman and is for Open Borders! READ UP


Here is WHY PAUL RYAN VOTES LIBERAL.. HIS WIFE IS A DEMOCRAT. 


Mrs. Janna Little Ryan: A Liberal DEMOCRAT is running the show from the Ryan family bedroom!

The marriage between a man and a woman is a mutual political-spiritual co-joining of forces and ideologies including love. The man will support and encourage his wife and the wife her husband.

So to fully understand a man and or a woman in their decision making processes one must first understand that its a team effort working together for the good of the family unit. This includes all external decision making processes too. A solid marriage will have the man supporting the wife’s decision’s and vice versa.

So if you are scratching your head and rubbing your rabbit foot in an expression of confusion and lack of understanding of Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and his blatant liberal agenda and decision making processes all you have to do is look into his family unit. Then you will learn that he supporting his wife’s ideology. As a man should and probably to remain in good graces in a supportive marriage.

Paul Ryan is married to Janna Little a liberal, left wing progressive, anti-Constitutional, big government George Soros supporter who voted for Barack Hussein Obama twice.

Heavy.com’s Stephanie Dube Dwilson in an October 2015 column titled “Janna Ryan, Paul’s Wife: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know” reported:

Janna comes from a Democratic family. Her cousin, Dan Boren, was a Democratic Representative for Oklahoma from 2005 to 2013. Dan’s father, David Boren, was the 21st governor of Oklahoma from 1975 to 1979. Dan’s grandfather, Lyle Boren, was a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1937 to 1947. Janna’s grandfather, Reuel Little, helped found a third party called the American Party in Oklahoma in 1968. He ran for governor in 1970 but didn’t win, ABC News reported.

Janna herself has lobbied for liberal movements, such as marching in Washington in college for women’s rights, The New York Times reported. Janna rarely gives interviews, CNN reported, and doesn’t speak publicly about her political views.

Speaker Paul Ryan will not operate his family unit and make decisions that will cause friction and go against the will of his wife.

This is how most marriages operate unless your wife is a Florida Gator fan and you are a FSU fan, then that would be another battle to work through. But the woman will always win. Even if you are right.

So if you want to understand why Speaker Ryan funded Obamacare and Planned Parent Hood, I suggest you ask his wife. She is wearing the pants in the family metaphorically speaking. In my humble opinion.

If you want to know why Paul Ryan is using taxpayer money to fund 100,000 un-vetted Syrians for a free taxpayer funded ride in cities across the United States ask his wife…. the bleeding heart liberal that she is. She is pro-open borders.

Paul Ryan’s decisions and thought processes are a reflection of his personal and also his spouse’s mindset. Mrs. Ryan is a life long Democrat who is pushing Obama’s agenda through her husband. And of course a happy life is a happy wife.

Paul Ryan also had a penchant for dating Democrats which allows him to embrace his real honest true to heart Democrat values. 

Paul Ryan is not a conservative my friends… if he was he would never have married Jenna Little.

Then there is this woman Paul Ryan is close to...

Paul Ryan’s ex-flame and last love of his life before getting married to Janna Little was his ex-girl friend and black American Democrat Daneeta Pope. 

She too voted for Obama twice and also supports his Communist Agenda.

The Daily Mail’s Belinda Robinson, Emily Anne Epstein. Toby Harnden and Hugo Guy in 2012 reported:

Paul Ryan’s African-American college sweetheart has spent time in prison for wire fraud, it emerged today.

Deneeta Pope hit headlines after MailOnline revealed that she was the Republican vice-presidential candidate’s ex-girlfriend who opened his eyes to the evils of racism.

She served five months in prison after defrauding her employer Ernst & Young out of $77,000 in 1999, according to the federal Bureau of Prisons.

Ms Pope admitted claiming funds from work to attend an educational course which did not exist.

Mr Ryan has stayed in touch with his ex over the two decades since they broke up – he even attended Ms Pope’s wedding in May this year.

Paul Ryan just can’t seem to stay away from females who are Democrats. Apparently Paul Ryan can fake being a Republican to muster through a Liberal agenda to please not only his liberal left wing Obama supporting wife; but also his former girl friends in the Democrat Party.

Paul Ryan is a massive threat to the U.S. Constitution and the national security of this nation, not only militarily. Our nation, our children and our future as a nation depend upon it. Speaker Paul Ryan is a Charlie Crist Republican, who is perhaps being manipulated by a Liberal wife.

And just as my former Executive Officer told me while I was forward deployed in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea with a Navy SEAL Unit in Operation Desert Storm:

Ross, never forget shipmate, the biggest threat to our national security is a dependent wife running her mouth at the grocery store bitching about something after getting a letter from a deployed husband. That’s why nobody is gonna be sending any letters home until we take out Saddam.

The same is true in politics….. lose lips sink ships. You want nooky tonight you vote with the Democrats!

Politics makes for strange bedfellows, in this case it is Janna and Paul Ryan.
Paul Ryan’s ex-flame and last love of his life before getting married to Janna Little was his ex-girl friend and black American Democrat Daneeta Pope. She too voted for Obama twice and also supports his Communist Agenda.
Paul Ryan’s African-American college sweetheart has spent time in prison for wire fraud... ( Ryan knows this )
Deneeta Pope hit headlines after MailOnline revealed that she was the Republican vice-presidential candidate’s ex-girlfriend who opened his eyes to the evils of racism.
She served five months in prison after defrauding her employer Ernst & Young out of $77,000 in 1999, according to the federal Bureau of Prisons.
Ms Pope admitted claiming funds from work to attend an educational course which did not exist.
Mr Ryan has stayed in touch with his ex over the two decades since they broke up – he even attended Ms Pope’s wedding.
Paul Ryan just can’t seem to stay away from females who are Democrats. Apparently Paul Ryan can fake being a Republican to muster through a Liberal agenda to please not only his liberal left wing Obama supporting wife; but also his former girl friends in the Democrat Party.
WARNING RYAN IS UP FOR RE ELECTION THIS PRIMARY.. GET HIM OUT!!
Paul Ryan is another TROJAN HORSE AS SPEAKER!

THEN THERE IS HIS POSITION ON OPEN BORDERS!

Paul Ryan’s Open Borders Push With Luis Gutierrez Exposed in 2013

 

 

From Breitbart

Rep. Luis Gutierrez’s endorsement of Paul Ryan for Speaker of the House has drawn new attention to Ryan’s two-decade history of pushing for open borders immigration policies. A previously little noticed 2013 video of Ryan and Gutierrez stumping for Sen. Marco Rubio’s amnesty bill—in which the two make a candid pitch for unlimited immigration—shows just how far Ryan is willing to go to push for open borders policies.

In the wide-ranging 53 minute video, which took place in Chicago, both Gutierrez and Ryan outline their shared plan for adopting open borders: that is, a national policy of allowing companies to bring in and hire as many foreign workers as they would like. This “free movement” of people across national boundaries is the centerpiece of the open borders ideology to which Ryan has devoted much of his career.
The video is entitled: “Rep. Paul Ryan and Rep. Luis Gutierrez Push For Immigration Reform.” The two Congressional partners lay out an immigration plan that is far more radical in scope than many would have imagined, and absent from virtually all major media coverage of the Ryan speakership push. The video gives fresh insight into what legislation Paul Ryan would advance— and what legislation he would block—if given the Speaker’s gavel.
In the video, Ryan begins by adopting a left-wing narrative about GOP voters and suggesting that their opposition to mass migration is fueled by “ignorance.” Ryan rejects the idea that America is “a country”— i.e. a land with a fixed border and heritage—but instead an “idea” since ideas don’t have borders.
Ryan says:

[America] is not just a country. America is an idea. It’s an idea that people from all over the world to aspire to achieve… There is no other economic system, no other immigration system that has done more to lift people out of poverty than the American free enterprise system, and American immigration system that we have here. That’s what makes us proud. So the question is: what do we do to restore this? […] We’ve had plenty of waves of immigration that have always been met with resistance in the past—the Irish wave is just but one of them. Each wave is met with some ignorance, is met with some resistance.

Ryan appears to be taking a page from his mentor Jack Kemp, who— as Ann Coulter has written— had a habit of smearing blue-collar voters of his own party if they opposed his expansionist agenda.
Ryan’s retelling of history leaves out critical facts. The history of the United States is not one of immigration but assimilation.
After the immigration wave from 1880-1920, immigration was cut off.  There was no net immigration increase for fifty straight years in order to melt European immigrants into society. Ignoring this history, Ryan is arguing that the unprecedentedly-large non-European wave of the last fifty years should be followed by an even bigger wave that is already happening.
In fact, as Breitbart News reported, Ryan was integral in derailing a 1990s bipartisan push to cut immigration – thereby repudiating the historical assimilation policy of the United States.
Gutierrez praises Ryan’s history of sabotaging conservative immigration reforms and embracing progressive ones.
As Gutierrez said in his introduction of Ryan:

I want to share something… I saw Paul— Congressman Ryan— and we were talking. And he— I just want you to know that when he worked for Kemp, and he was a staffer there, they were against Proposition 187 in California. I want you to know— because people think, ‘Oh, he just showed up lately on the scene on immigration’— No, he has a history on this issue. And I want you to know that in 2005 when [Jeff] Flake and I introduced comprehensive immigration bill… and Kennedy and McCain was the first bipartisan, bi-cameral bill… Paul Ryan was an original cosponsor of comprehensive immigration reform. And I want to share one last thing with you. There was a day that we were in his office, and I’ll apologize to him later, and he said to me, ‘Well, Luis, I don’t want to do it because it’s the political thing to do, I want to do it cause it’s the right thing to do.’ And he said, ‘You know, you and I are Catholics and our Catholic values do not allow us to create a permanent underclass.’ And you know what? My heart soared that day. I mean I could walk so much easier that day. I felt strengthened that day by his words.

Ryan confirmed Gutierrez’s assertion.
“Luis is right,” Ryan declared. “I’ve worked on this issue back since the early 90s. And many Republican and Democrat coalitions trying to make this system work.”
Ryan’s work in the 90s helped add another 10 million immigrants to the United States, according to the President of NumbersUSA Roy Beck.
In the video, Ryan seemed proud of the role he was playing in completing the Rubio-Schumer amnesty push:

For the first time in a long time I really believe that we have an opportunity to have a real, long-term solution… and it’s because like Luis Gutierrez, and Paul Ryan [i.e. referring to himself in third person], and everybody in between are talking to each other in a sincere way, to come together, to find common ground to once and for all get this done… I really think we are the farthest on the path ever since I’ve been looking at this issue and I’ve been in Congress for 15 years.

The Rubio-Schumer bill would have issued 33 million green cards in ten years—or 33 new immigrants for every one South Carolina GOP voter. South Carolina is significant because one of Ryan’s other partners in trying to push an immigration expansion is Congressman Mick Mulvaney.
Ryan and Gutierrez then proceeded to lay out their plan for open borders. Again, open borders refers to a policy of allowing people to freely and legally enter the a country without any firm limits. For instance, for European countries within the European Union, people are entitled to move freely from one country to another. Ryan lays out how the same legal structure could be adopted for the United States and all the foreign countries of the world.
Ryan describes this “open” immigration system and how it will replace American workers:

We need to let legal immigrants come here legally. We can’t have a system where we pay homage and adherence to the rule of law if we don’t have an open system where people can come here in search of their American dream, where the work that won’t be done by people who are already here can be filled by the people who want to come here and do those jobs.

National Review’s Rich Lowry once declared that Republican politicians who argue there are jobs Americans won’t do—or to use Ryan’s words “work that won’t be done by people who are already here”— “that person should be shot, he should be hanged, he should be wrapped in a carpet and thrown in the Potomac River.”
Moreover, Ryan’s statement is simply not logical—the United States already has the most expansive immigration policy in the world, letting tens of millions of foreign nationals legally enter the U.S., vote in U.S. elections, and claim U.S benefits.
The Kennedy-pushed 1965 immigration rewrite eliminated President Calvin Coolidge’s immigration caps and opened up American immigration visas to almost anyone in the world. Year after year, as a result of our current policy, the United States admits one million plus foreign nationals on green cards, one million guest workers, dependents and refugees, and half a million foreign youths sought by college administration. Because of our vast admissions policy, America has four times more immigrants living here than has any other country on the planet. Yet Ryan is arguing that this is not enough, that the United States should effectively have a legal free movement clause with the world.
“We need to clear the backlog of green cards,” Ryan declared.
But the backlog is a term invented by immigration expansionists to say anyone who wants a U.S. green card should be giving the green card. Ironically, most of the people who have applied for the millions of green cards Ryan wants expedited come from poor countries are likely to favor big government policies like Obamacare.
Ryan then outlined his plan to grant amnesty to the illegal aliens, in addition to all the foreign nationals to whom Ryan wants to give expedited admission slips:

We have to offer people a path to earned legalization. We have to invite people to come out of the shadows… We need to make sure that the children who are here, who are brought here, who did not choose to come here, who were brought by their parents– that they have an ability to earn citizenship in a far faster way. These are the things that we think are the principles that Republicans and Democrats can come together on.

By arguing that speedy citizenship should be guaranteed to any illegal alien brought here by his or her parents, Ryan has made another argument for open borders. There are two billion youth in the world; under Ryan’s theory, if any of their parents smuggle them into the United States, the parents should be made voting citizens. As former USCIS Director Ken Palinkas has explained, granting amnesty to illegal immigrant minors, “extend[s] birthright citizenship in the future to include the foreign citizens of other countries” and represents a promise of “perpetual amnesty.”
Ryan explained that his position on immigration is in part motivated by his belief that American workers should be replaced: “We want an economic based immigration system where…  labor and supply and demand can meet each other so we can help fuel our economy and create jobs,” Ryan said.
The phrase “labor supply and demand can meet each other,” is a centerpiece of open borders thought. Under this global one-world theory, any willing employer should be able to hire any willing worker regardless of what country they live in. This view, that America is an “idea” and not a “nation” sees borders as an obstacle to commerce.
Demonstrating how outside-the-mainstream Ryan’s view is here, a recent poll from KellyAnne Conway’s The Polling Company found that only four percent of the entire country believes that American workers should not get preference for jobs over those applying from foreign countries.
However, Ryan goes even further than the four percent by suggesting there should be no limits at all – that employers should be able to legally hire foreigners whenever they want and in any quantity.
Even though there are currently 94 million Americans operating outside of the workforce, Paul Ryan argues that we need to increase low-skilled immigration so that foreign laborers can come and go to fill any job they please.

We want to have a system where people can come here and work– go back and forth if they want to… so that we have an open door to the people who want to come and contribute to our country, who want to come and make a difference in their families’ lives, and our economy… That’s why we have all of these various principles that we agree work if we put this together… and that’s why it’s very encouraging to see Republicans and Democrats coming together on this issue.

Again, Ryan is here articulating the open borders vision of the “free movement” of people across international boundaries.  What the EU has among solely European countries – over the objections of rising insurgent populist parties – Ryan would like America to have with every country on the planet.
Ryan also expressed his desire to give away coveted white-collar jobs: “You have to have a workable guest worker system. You have to have a system so that high-tech employers can get high-tech entrepreneurs.”
Gutierrez confirmed their plan to increase foreign labor to compete for middle class American jobs. When the two were asked about the next step in their legislative plans, Gutierrez answered for them as Ryan looked on sympathetically while Gutierrez attacked American workers who “do not have the talent” necessary to fill American jobs.

We’ve been working with our Republican colleagues in putting legislation together, and it will have some of the very elements that Congressman Ryan and I have described. I mean, if you collect together what he has said and I have said, you kind of the get the general out [of the plan]… We’re going to have a worker program and in the high tech industry we’re going to tell people, ‘Look, there are tens of thousands of jobs at Microsoft and Intel and the STEM industry needs. Tens of thousands that go unfilled because we do not have the talent graduating from our own universities, so this tells us that we have some work to do in terms of sending kids… so we’re going to invite people to come into the system that can fill [these jobs].

As Breitbart News has previously reported, there is in fact an 11-million person surplus of STEM-certified Americans. Many of these American workers have been forced to train their foreign replacements before the company lets them go, as one terminated Disney employee documented exclusively for Breitbart News. Gutierrez claims that Microsoft has thousands of jobs available, but in the last year, Microsoft actually announced plans to lay off more than 18,000 workers while simultaneously lobbying for legislation championed by Ryan, Gutierrez, and Rubio that would increase the number of low-wage tech workers brought in to take American jobs.
Ryan confirmed Gutierrez’s analysis: “What Luis and I are putting out there are the basic components of a system that we want to endure. We don’t want to be having this conversation five years from now because we just did piecemeal reform… so that’s why we’re talking about all of these things together.”
Throughout the entire exchange, it was clear that Ryan got along with Gutierrez personally and intimately. At one point during the discussion, after Ryan gently teased Gutierrez for making faces at him, Gutierrez stroked Ryan’s arm and then rested his head on Ryan’s shoulder as Ryan laughed comfortably. The two were clearly at ease with one another.
Gutierrez continued told audience members at the event that new arrivals are more entrepreneurial than those who have been in the United States for a longer period of time. Gutierrez seemed excited about the prospect of transforming America’s economy so that it more closely mirrored that of the street-vendors economy of developing countries in Latin America where wares are sold on street corners to impoverished families:

It seems to me that the closer you are to the moment you arrived in America, the more entrepreneurial you are… It just cause I see people in the neighborhood that just get here and I see a grown man and he’s forty, forty-five years old and he’s selling cotton candy on a long pole that’s maybe 10 feet up and he’s out there because he’s going to make a dollar doing that. I just see people on every corner just selling stuff and creating businesses, that entrepreneurial spirit is there, we want to bring it to the forefront.

Ryan nodded his head up and down with vigor in agreement.
Ryan explained to the audience, “This [i.e. immigration] is one of those unique issues where a Democrat and a Republican– and there are plenty others in Congress– see that this is important for the vitality of our economy.”
“It’s important,” Ryan declared:

To modernize our laws, so that we can maintain national security and if we meet this moment, all of the faith in divided government– I’m joking here, but there is no faith in our divided government, we haven’t gotten anything done of record, of seriousness, in a long time, that’s an uncertainty tax that I think is plaguing this economy, ‘Those guys in Washington can’t get anything right, they never get anything done’– this would be an opportunity to prove them [the American people] wrong. This would be an opportunity to prove that in this country divided government can actually work and make a difference.

On a note of camaraderie, Ryan declared, “It’s very encouraging to see Republicans and Democrats coming together on this issue.”
Ryan also introduced a theme that would soon become Marco Rubio’s campaign theme. It offers a veiled allusion to how great life will be in a “New American Century” brought about by Rubio-Ryan Republicans:

When you take a look at the fact that America in the 20th century was the envy of the world economy, when you take a look at the fact that because of the creative, the hard work, and the entrepreneurship of our people, of our workers, you’ve got a lot of other countries that are looking and they’re trying to catch up with us. And, in fact, it’s a lot more competitive in the 21st century than it was in the 20th century. We can’t rest on our laurels. We can’t look back and just take our future success for granted. We need to make sure that we have an economy that is wired for the 21st century economy. And that means we need to keep the best and the brightest here in America. That means hard working people who want to contribute, work hard, get ahead, play by the rules and rise– that helps everybody in this country. That is what immigration is. We need to make sure that for the 21st century we are wired so that we can compete and survive and thrive in the 21st century just like we did in the 20th century.

HILLARY LOST THE 2nd DEBATE HANDS DOWN.. RINO REPUBLICANS NOW SMELL LIKE SHIT TOO

DONALD TRUMP WON THE DEBATE HANDS DOWN! IT WAS A KNOCK OUT!

I don't know if you saw it but as Hillary spoke the flies were swarming around her. One landed on her head and another on her blouse.

THE FLIES SMELLED THE BULLSHIT COMING OUT OF HER... ( or was it her full load in her adult diapers!)

TRUMP ALL THE WAY..

OBAMA 
ATTRACTS FLIES TOO

Obama used fake name on Clinton server. This is prosecutable under Espionage ACT. DOJ and FBI hid facts.

Donald Trump is now President and we have a new Attorney General. Jeff Sessions. Will the AG look the other way? Will he bring these crooks to justice? We will see.

So lets find out WHY Obama used a Fake name on Hillary's secret email server.

I will tell you why.. because of the money they were skimming off all the Clinton Deals.

I'd wager that Joe Biden and the rest of the Obama Regime used fake emails as well to steal from the country.

Why you might ask? Obama got a "piece of the action".. why else would his admin let it continue. 

He and his gang of thugs got a piece of the action on every illegal deal as part of the deal to look the other way on.

He was on Hillary's server check discussing the deals to make sure he got his cut! So was Biden and Kerry and Comey and Loretta Lynch and others.

Loretta Lynch is protecting Obama and Hillary because Obama is involved in this money scheme and if Hillary is Indicted she will squeal.

DOES IT ALL MAKE SENSE NOW? DID YOU KNOW THAT Clinton Campaign HQ was Just Two Floors Below Loretta Lynch in the same building? Yup!!

Why Comey kept quiet about these transactions? He got some of the cut too. Everyone in the Corrupt Obama Cabal was up to their eyeballs in making deals.

Lets list some of them: I am sure the readers will have others they can name.

1. All the Energy solar power bullshit deals like Solyndra. Van Jones chief front man.

2. Obamacare's $ 1 Bliion dollar website that was a bust. Key players Valerie Jarret's Daughter and Michelle Obama's College Room mate were the fronts for this crooked deal.

3. The $ 1 Billion dollar "Untraceable Money of  a Pallet" deal with Iran. Front man John Kerry and his Iranian Son In Law.

4. The Uranium Deal with Russia . Bill Clinton and Hillary as Fronts.

5. Cash for Bribing politicians in Afghanistan.

The list goes on on and on. here is all this money? In Dubai in encrypted accounts with no chance of getting teh info short of a threat of war!

 "Did Obama use phony name to communicate with you on private server"

UPDATE: 10/14/16
Wikileaks uncovers attempt to protect Obama in email scandal

'Hillary couldn't be proven guilty without proving the president guilty as well'

From World Net Daily:
One of the nation’s top legal minds, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, told WND the latest WIkileaks bombshell confirms his belief that Hillary Clinton wasn’t prosecuted for mishandling classified information because President Obama would have been implicated, too.
Wikileaks released an email on Friday from March 4, 2015, sent by Clinton’s eventual presidential campaign manager, John Podesta, to her attorney Cheryl Mills, asking if they should decline to turn over emails between Clinton and President Obama sent over her private server.
Podesta suggested invoking “executive privilege” to withhold the emails just one day after the House Benghazi Committee had told Clinton to provide all her emails.

Clinton campaign manager John Podesta

Podesta’s email read: “Think we should hold emails to and from potus [President of the United States]? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I(t) seems like they will.”
Mills did not answer Podesta’s email, but the emails between Obama and Clinton were never turned over to the Benghazi committee. Eighteen such emails were turned over the State Department, which has refused to release them.
McCarthy told WND, “This confirms what I have said all along: President Obama was engaged in the same reckless conduct as then-Secretary Clinton: engaging in exchanges of highly sensitive information — information that is presumptively classified under the president’s own executive order — over a non-secure, non-government system.”
He added, “That is why Huma Abedin was so stunned when she learned about it, asking as anyone with a security clearance would ask: ‘How is that not classified?’”

Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin

Indeed, the evidence is growing that Obama knowingly did what Clinton did, and transferred classified information over her unsecure and unauthorized private email system.
Emails between the president and his secretary of state with sensitive information are “born classified,” as McCarthy pointed out in his Sept. 26, article in National Review titled, “Obama’s Conflict Tanked the Clinton E-mail Investigation — As Predicted.”
Obama himself seemed keenly aware of that, because he used a fake name in those emails.
“Abedin knew,” wrote McCarthy, “as the FBI agents who were interviewing her surely knew, that at least some of Obama’s pseudonymous exchanges with Clinton had to have crossed into these categories.”
By “these categories,” McCarthy was referring to Obama’s own executive order — EO 13526, which states: “The unauthorized disclosure of foreign government information is presumed to cause damage to the national security,” which includes such categories as foreign relations, foreign activities of the United States, military plans, and intelligence activities.

Andrew McCarthy

Five days after the New York Times disclosed the existence of Clinton’s private email server, Obama told CBS News on March 7, 2015, that he learned about it at “the same time everybody else learned it, through news reports.”
That was not true, because Obama himself had exchanged emails with Clinton on the server. And, as noted, he even used a fake name, for reasons never explained.
The White House later claimed Obama meant to say he did know of the server, just not the details.
It is McCarthy’s contention that the FBI cleared Clinton not because she was innocent, but because the president was also guilty.
“Hillary couldn’t be proven guilty without proving the president guilty as well,” he wrote, adding, “Any possibility of prosecuting Hillary Clinton was tanked by President Obama’s conflict of interest.”
That is why, he asserted, “the Justice Department and the FBI effectively rewrote the relevant criminal statute in order to avoid applying it to Clinton.”
He imagined what would have happened had Clinton been indicted.
“The White House would have attempted to maintain the secrecy of the Obama-Clinton emails (under Obama’s invocation of a bogus ‘presidential communications’ privilege), but Clinton’s defense lawyers would have demanded the disclosure of the emails in order to show that Obama had engaged in the same misconduct, yet only she, not he, was being prosecuted.”
The revelation that Podesta was floating the concept “executive privilege” to withhold emails that could have implicated the president, yet that claim was not officially invoked, makes McCarthy’s words from two weeks ago look prescient.

“That is why,” he wrote, “as I argued in February, Obama is trying to get away with the vaporous claim that presidential communications must be kept confidential. He does not want to say ‘executive privilege’ because that sounds too much like Nixon.”
But the keen mind of the former federal prosecutor who obtained convictions of the first World Trade Center bombers and plotters saw even more layers of intrigue in that simple but damning one line email from Podesta disclosed Friday by Wikileaks.
“The new revelations, nevertheless, raise interesting issues,” McCarthy told WND.
“First, the context in which this conversation between John Podesta and Cheryl Mills arose was a subpoena from the House Benghazi Committee, so that raises the question whether there is some Benghazi relevance to the Obama-Clinton email exchanges that caused Podesta to raise the matter with Mills.”
In other words, were they hiding subpoenaed information relevant to a congressional investigation into the terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2012, that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens?
“Second,” McCarthy continued, “once again we find Ms. Mills smack in the middle of things — she’s a witness in the investigation, a subject of the investigation, a lawyer to the main subject of the investigation, a key participant in the sorting and destruction of e-mails, a possessor of a private laptop containing classified information, and now an adviser to the White House regarding executive privilege regarding the subject matter of the investigation. Oh, and she asked for and received immunity from prosecution.”

Cheryl Mills

The seemingly enormous potential for conflict of interest in Mill’s alternating roles as confidante, personal attorney for Clinton, and her chief of staff at the State Department was the subject of a piece McCarthy wrote on Sept. 2, titled, “Hillary Clinton’s Mind-Boggling FBI Interview – What Was Cheryl Mills Doing There?”
He wrote that he “nearly fell out of my chair” upon learning the Justice Department had allowed Mills to act as an attorney for Clinton at her FBI interview, when Mills herself was a “witness, if not a subject, of the investigation.”
That’s because the Justice Department allowed Mills “to invoke attorney-client privilege on behalf of Mrs. Clinton in order to thwart the FBI’s attempt to inquire into the procedure used to produce Clinton’s emails to the State Department.”
Furthermore, “Mills was a participant in that procedure – and it is the procedure in which, we now know, well over 30,000 emails were attempted to be destroyed, including several thousand that contained government-related business.”

Mills and Clinton

McCarthy further noted that when she worked for Clinton at the State Department, “Mills was not acting in the capacity of a lawyer – not for then-Secretary Clinton and not for the State Department. Moreover, as Clinton’s chief-of-staff, Mills was intimately involved in issues related to Clinton’s private email set up.”
The former prosecutor asserted that “Mills, after leaving the State Department, was barred by ethical rules from acting as Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee.”
He said there was no way Mills should have been permitted to participate as a lawyer in the process of producing Clinton’s emails to the State Department nearly two years after they’d both left.
“I thought it was astonishing that the Justice Department indulged her attorney-client privilege claim, which frustrated the FBI’s ability to question her on a key aspect of the investigation. But it is simply unbelievable to find her turning up at Mrs. Clinton’s interview – participating in the capacity of a lawyer under circumstances where Clinton was being investigated over matters in which Mills participated as a non-lawyer government official.”
He found it inexplicable and astonishing that the Justice Department allowed all of those irregularities in accommodating Mills.

WELL NOW YOU KNOW... Obama lied that he heard about the Hillary server from the media! Why ? Because of the Money Laundering and Benghazi. Yes but if he communicated with Hillary on that server he is in violation of the Espionage Act.the applicable sections are:

• Section 793, which applies to anyone who has been "entrusted" with information relating to the national defense, and to a federal official who "through gross negligence permits" information "to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed."
• Section 798, which applies to any government official who "knowingly and willfully communicates" information "to an unauthorized person."

IF HILLARY WENT DOWN.. OBAMA WOULD HAVE GONE DOWN AND COMEY WAS NOT GOING TO LET THAT HAPPEN..

Now the WHITE HOUSE CLAIMS EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE TO HIDE THE CRIME.... AND THE TOTALLY CORRUPT JUSTICE DEPARTMENT UNDER HIS BLACK LACKEY LORRETA LYNCH AND THE FEDERAL BUFFOON INVESTIGATORS ( FBI ) UNDER JAMES COMEY WILL PROTECT THE CORRUPTION.

THEY ALL DO THIS BECAUSE GEORGE SOROS AND THE CABAL HAVE GUARANTEED THEM A HILLARY WIN ... ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. SO THEY ALL ACT WITH IMPUNITY.. BECAUSE THEY HAVE ALL BEEN GUARANTEED A HILLARY WIN IN NOVEMBER AND NO PROSECUTION.

This is the only explanation for the extreme level of corruption and obfuscation from the highest levels of Government.

GOD HELP US! I HOPE WE CAN PULL OFF A TRUMP VICTORY!

HERE'S THE BREAKING NEWS!

Obama Used A Pseudonym In Emails With Hillary, FBI Data Dump Reveals

FBI, when the agency released 189 pages of notes from its investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server, just three days before she squares off against Donald Trump in the first presidential debate.

The notes are from FBI's interviews with some of Clinton’s closest aides, such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills; senior State Department officials; and Marcel Lazar, also known as the Romanian hacker “Guccifer." A summary of the interviews had been released in the overall FBI report. Politically, Friday's release helps keep the issue relevant before Trump and Hillary hit the debate stage on Monday in what is set to be the most watched presidential debate in history with some 100 million expected to watch. The release also came hours after news that top Clinton aide Cheryl Mills had obtained a limited immunity deal from the FBI in order to cooperate with its investigation.
Much of the released information had already been made public. One notable exchange from the FBI's June 7, 2016 interview with "Guccifer" supposedly confirms FBI Director Comey's claim that Lazar falsely asserted to Fox News that he'd accessed Clinton's server.  "Lazar began by stating that he had never claimed to hack the Clinton server. [An FBI agent] then advised that Fox News had recently published an article which reported that Lazar had claimed to have to Clinton server. Lazar then stated that he recalled the interview with Fox News, and that he had lied to them about hacking the Clinton server." It remains unclear why he would have lied.

Among the other FBI interviewees whose reports were made public Friday included Jake Sullivan, Clinton's policy planning director; Bryan Pagliano, a former Clinton technology aide; Monica Hanley, a veteran Clinton aide who worked for her in the Senate and at State; and Sidney Blumenthal, Clinton’s longtime confidant.
In other interviews released Friday evening, Clinton aides seemed generally unconcerned about her use of a private email server and said she adhered to standard security measures - arguments they have made extensively in public. As CNN reported, one IT worker took a somewhat cavalier attitude, joking in one interview that a new 60-day retention policy was a "Hillary coverup operation" - which sparked the Trump campaign's anger.
"The fact an IT staffer maintaining Clinton's secret server called a new retention policy designed to delete emails after 60 days a 'Hillary coverup operation' suggests there was a concerted effort to systematically destroy potentially incriminating information," Trump spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement. "It's no wonder that at least five individuals tied to the email scandal, including Clinton's top State Department aide and attorney Cheryl Mills, secured immunity deals from the Obama Justice Department to avoid prosecution."
But perhaps the most interesting finding emerged from the "Miscellaneous" section in the Huma Abedin interview, in which it was revealed that none other than president Barack Obama had used a pseudonym in his communication with Hillary. In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was presented an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, dated June 28, 2012 with the subject "Re: Congratulations", Clinton's aide did not recognize the name of the sender.
"Once informed that the sender's name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: 'How is this not classified?'" the report says. "Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president's use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email."


State Department has refused to make public that and other emails Clinton exchanged with Obama. Lawyers have cited the "presidential communications privilege," a variation of executive privilege, in order to withhold the messages under the Freedom of Information Act. It is therefore unknown what the president's "alternative" email account was, or who hosted it.

Another curious discovery is the admission the Huma Abedin may have forward most if not all of her internal emails to her Yahoo email account "if she needed to print an email or document." In light of the recent revelation that half a billion Yahoo user accounts have been hacked definitively as of 2014 - and perhaps sooner - a quick scan through the dark web may reveal countless state department emails floating around in the hacked cloud, some perhaps originating from the president himself.


But going back to Obama's use of a psudonym to communicate with Hillary, this is especially notable because in a March 2015 interview with CBS, just after the NYT reported of Hillary's use of a private email server, the president said he had only learned about this from the press: in retrospect he may have known all along.

CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante asked Mr. Obama when he learned about her private email system after his Saturday appearance in Selma, Alabama. "The same time everybody else learned it through news reports," the president told Plante. "The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived," Mr. Obama said. "I'm glad that Hillary's instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed."

The president apparently had no problem that hillary would also delete some 15,000 emails despite a retention order, over which over 5,000 were work related.

At the time Hillary Clinton tweeted that "I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible." The president reiterated his support of these actions. Only later would it emerge that she deleted thousands of work-related and potentially confidential emails as part of the following infamous BleachBit purge.

As CBS quoted Obama then, "despite widespread criticism from Republicans who believe Clinton acted inappropriately, the president continued to defend his former Cabinet member's record. "Let me just say that Hillary Clinton is and has been an outstanding public servant. She was a great secretary of state for me," Mr. Obama said.

As it now emerges that Obama himself HAS lied when he told the AMERICAN PEOPLE.

He said that he did not know about Hillary's email server.. Like I said in my opening.

ITS TOME FOR DONALD TRUMP TO CALL FOR 200,000 People to Surround the White House and demand that Obama LEAVE... NOW!

THERE IS NO LAW FOR US TO FOLLOW.

The President lies.. His Department of Justice Covers up. His FBI obfuscates the Facts, His Military Leaders lie about the status of our forces, His IRS attacks Americans with impunity, His Secretary of State steals and obstructs Justice and gets away with it and the Congress is so scared and castrated that they watch it all happen and go along with the flow.

Congress should have resigned en mass at the first sign of this corruption. Instead they play the Kabuki Theater charade and bring shame to this GREAT COUNTRY.

Thomas Jefferson wrote about what needs to be done to William Stephens Smith

Paris Nov. 13. 1787.

the people can not be all, & always, well informed. the part which is wrong [. . .] will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. if they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. we have had 13. states independent 11. years. there has been one rebellion. that comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. what country before ever existed a century & half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms. the remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. what signify a few lives lost in a century or two? the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it’s natural manure.


PATRIOTS IT IS TIME FOR REBELLION...