Friday, October 7, 2016

Obama used fake name on Clinton server. This is prosecutable under Espionage ACT. DOJ and FBI hid facts.

Donald Trump is now President and we have a new Attorney General. Jeff Sessions. Will the AG look the other way? Will he bring these crooks to justice? We will see.

So lets find out WHY Obama used a Fake name on Hillary's secret email server.

I will tell you why.. because of the money they were skimming off all the Clinton Deals.

I'd wager that Joe Biden and the rest of the Obama Regime used fake emails as well to steal from the country.

Why you might ask? Obama got a "piece of the action".. why else would his admin let it continue. 

He and his gang of thugs got a piece of the action on every illegal deal as part of the deal to look the other way on.

He was on Hillary's server check discussing the deals to make sure he got his cut! So was Biden and Kerry and Comey and Loretta Lynch and others.

Loretta Lynch is protecting Obama and Hillary because Obama is involved in this money scheme and if Hillary is Indicted she will squeal.

DOES IT ALL MAKE SENSE NOW? DID YOU KNOW THAT Clinton Campaign HQ was Just Two Floors Below Loretta Lynch in the same building? Yup!!

Why Comey kept quiet about these transactions? He got some of the cut too. Everyone in the Corrupt Obama Cabal was up to their eyeballs in making deals.

Lets list some of them: I am sure the readers will have others they can name.

1. All the Energy solar power bullshit deals like Solyndra. Van Jones chief front man.

2. Obamacare's $ 1 Bliion dollar website that was a bust. Key players Valerie Jarret's Daughter and Michelle Obama's College Room mate were the fronts for this crooked deal.

3. The $ 1 Billion dollar "Untraceable Money of  a Pallet" deal with Iran. Front man John Kerry and his Iranian Son In Law.

4. The Uranium Deal with Russia . Bill Clinton and Hillary as Fronts.

5. Cash for Bribing politicians in Afghanistan.

The list goes on on and on. here is all this money? In Dubai in encrypted accounts with no chance of getting teh info short of a threat of war!

 "Did Obama use phony name to communicate with you on private server"

UPDATE: 10/14/16
Wikileaks uncovers attempt to protect Obama in email scandal

'Hillary couldn't be proven guilty without proving the president guilty as well'

From World Net Daily:
One of the nation’s top legal minds, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, told WND the latest WIkileaks bombshell confirms his belief that Hillary Clinton wasn’t prosecuted for mishandling classified information because President Obama would have been implicated, too.
Wikileaks released an email on Friday from March 4, 2015, sent by Clinton’s eventual presidential campaign manager, John Podesta, to her attorney Cheryl Mills, asking if they should decline to turn over emails between Clinton and President Obama sent over her private server.
Podesta suggested invoking “executive privilege” to withhold the emails just one day after the House Benghazi Committee had told Clinton to provide all her emails.

Clinton campaign manager John Podesta
Clinton campaign manager John Podesta
Podesta’s email read: “Think we should hold emails to and from potus [President of the United States]? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I(t) seems like they will.”
Mills did not answer Podesta’s email, but the emails between Obama and Clinton were never turned over to the Benghazi committee. Eighteen such emails were turned over the State Department, which has refused to release them.
McCarthy told WND, “This confirms what I have said all along: President Obama was engaged in the same reckless conduct as then-Secretary Clinton: engaging in exchanges of highly sensitive information — information that is presumptively classified under the president’s own executive order — over a non-secure, non-government system.”
He added, “That is why Huma Abedin was so stunned when she learned about it, asking as anyone with a security clearance would ask: ‘How is that not classified?’”

Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin
Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin
Indeed, the evidence is growing that Obama knowingly did what Clinton did, and transferred classified information over her unsecure and unauthorized private email system.
Emails between the president and his secretary of state with sensitive information are “born classified,” as McCarthy pointed out in his Sept. 26, article in National Review titled, “Obama’s Conflict Tanked the Clinton E-mail Investigation — As Predicted.”
Obama himself seemed keenly aware of that, because he used a fake name in those emails.
“Abedin knew,” wrote McCarthy, “as the FBI agents who were interviewing her surely knew, that at least some of Obama’s pseudonymous exchanges with Clinton had to have crossed into these categories.”
By “these categories,” McCarthy was referring to Obama’s own executive order — EO 13526, which states: “The unauthorized disclosure of foreign government information is presumed to cause damage to the national security,” which includes such categories as foreign relations, foreign activities of the United States, military plans, and intelligence activities.

Andrew McCarthy
Five days after the New York Times disclosed the existence of Clinton’s private email server, Obama told CBS News on March 7, 2015, that he learned about it at “the same time everybody else learned it, through news reports.”
That was not true, because Obama himself had exchanged emails with Clinton on the server. And, as noted, he even used a fake name, for reasons never explained.
The White House later claimed Obama meant to say he did know of the server, just not the details.
It is McCarthy’s contention that the FBI cleared Clinton not because she was innocent, but because the president was also guilty.
“Hillary couldn’t be proven guilty without proving the president guilty as well,” he wrote, adding, “Any possibility of prosecuting Hillary Clinton was tanked by President Obama’s conflict of interest.”
That is why, he asserted, “the Justice Department and the FBI effectively rewrote the relevant criminal statute in order to avoid applying it to Clinton.”
He imagined what would have happened had Clinton been indicted.
“The White House would have attempted to maintain the secrecy of the Obama-Clinton emails (under Obama’s invocation of a bogus ‘presidential communications’ privilege), but Clinton’s defense lawyers would have demanded the disclosure of the emails in order to show that Obama had engaged in the same misconduct, yet only she, not he, was being prosecuted.”
The revelation that Podesta was floating the concept “executive privilege” to withhold emails that could have implicated the president, yet that claim was not officially invoked, makes McCarthy’s words from two weeks ago look prescient.
“That is why,” he wrote, “as I argued in February, Obama is trying to get away with the vaporous claim that presidential communications must be kept confidential. He does not want to say ‘executive privilege’ because that sounds too much like Nixon.”
But the keen mind of the former federal prosecutor who obtained convictions of the first World Trade Center bombers and plotters saw even more layers of intrigue in that simple but damning one line email from Podesta disclosed Friday by Wikileaks.
“The new revelations, nevertheless, raise interesting issues,” McCarthy told WND.
“First, the context in which this conversation between John Podesta and Cheryl Mills arose was a subpoena from the House Benghazi Committee, so that raises the question whether there is some Benghazi relevance to the Obama-Clinton email exchanges that caused Podesta to raise the matter with Mills.”
In other words, were they hiding subpoenaed information relevant to a congressional investigation into the terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2012, that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens?
“Second,” McCarthy continued, “once again we find Ms. Mills smack in the middle of things — she’s a witness in the investigation, a subject of the investigation, a lawyer to the main subject of the investigation, a key participant in the sorting and destruction of e-mails, a possessor of a private laptop containing classified information, and now an adviser to the White House regarding executive privilege regarding the subject matter of the investigation. Oh, and she asked for and received immunity from prosecution.”

Cheryl Mills
Cheryl Mills
The seemingly enormous potential for conflict of interest in Mill’s alternating roles as confidante, personal attorney for Clinton, and her chief of staff at the State Department was the subject of a piece McCarthy wrote on Sept. 2, titled, “Hillary Clinton’s Mind-Boggling FBI Interview – What Was Cheryl Mills Doing There?”
He wrote that he “nearly fell out of my chair” upon learning the Justice Department had allowed Mills to act as an attorney for Clinton at her FBI interview, when Mills herself was a “witness, if not a subject, of the investigation.”
That’s because the Justice Department allowed Mills “to invoke attorney-client privilege on behalf of Mrs. Clinton in order to thwart the FBI’s attempt to inquire into the procedure used to produce Clinton’s emails to the State Department.”
Furthermore, “Mills was a participant in that procedure – and it is the procedure in which, we now know, well over 30,000 emails were attempted to be destroyed, including several thousand that contained government-related business.”

Mills and Clinton
Mills and Clinton
McCarthy further noted that when she worked for Clinton at the State Department, “Mills was not acting in the capacity of a lawyer – not for then-Secretary Clinton and not for the State Department. Moreover, as Clinton’s chief-of-staff, Mills was intimately involved in issues related to Clinton’s private email set up.”
The former prosecutor asserted that “Mills, after leaving the State Department, was barred by ethical rules from acting as Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee.”
He said there was no way Mills should have been permitted to participate as a lawyer in the process of producing Clinton’s emails to the State Department nearly two years after they’d both left.
“I thought it was astonishing that the Justice Department indulged her attorney-client privilege claim, which frustrated the FBI’s ability to question her on a key aspect of the investigation. But it is simply unbelievable to find her turning up at Mrs. Clinton’s interview – participating in the capacity of a lawyer under circumstances where Clinton was being investigated over matters in which Mills participated as a non-lawyer government official.”
He found it inexplicable and astonishing that the Justice Department allowed all of those irregularities in accommodating Mills.

WELL NOW YOU KNOW... Obama lied that he heard about the Hillary server from the media! Why ? Because of the Money Laundering and Benghazi. Yes but if he communicated with Hillary on that server he is in violation of the Espionage Act.the applicable sections are:

  • Section 793, which applies to anyone who has been "entrusted" with information relating to the national defense, and to a federal official who "through gross negligence permits" information "to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed."
  • Section 798, which applies to any government official who "knowingly and willfully communicates" information "to an unauthorized person."



This is the only explanation for the extreme level of corruption and obfuscation from the highest levels of Government.



Obama Used A Pseudonym In Emails With Hillary, FBI Data Dump Reveals

FBI, when the agency released 189 pages of notes from its investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server, just three days before she squares off against Donald Trump in the first presidential debate.

The notes are from FBI's interviews with some of Clinton’s closest aides, such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills; senior State Department officials; and Marcel Lazar, also known as the Romanian hacker “Guccifer." A summary of the interviews had been released in the overall FBI report. Politically, Friday's release helps keep the issue relevant before Trump and Hillary hit the debate stage on Monday in what is set to be the most watched presidential debate in history with some 100 million expected to watch. The release also came hours after news that top Clinton aide Cheryl Mills had obtained a limited immunity deal from the FBI in order to cooperate with its investigation.
Much of the released information had already been made public. One notable exchange from the FBI's June 7, 2016 interview with "Guccifer" supposedly confirms FBI Director Comey's claim that Lazar falsely asserted to Fox News that he'd accessed Clinton's server.  "Lazar began by stating that he had never claimed to hack the Clinton server. [An FBI agent] then advised that Fox News had recently published an article which reported that Lazar had claimed to have to Clinton server. Lazar then stated that he recalled the interview with Fox News, and that he had lied to them about hacking the Clinton server." It remains unclear why he would have lied.

Among the other FBI interviewees whose reports were made public Friday included Jake Sullivan, Clinton's policy planning director; Bryan Pagliano, a former Clinton technology aide; Monica Hanley, a veteran Clinton aide who worked for her in the Senate and at State; and Sidney Blumenthal, Clinton’s longtime confidant.
In other interviews released Friday evening, Clinton aides seemed generally unconcerned about her use of a private email server and said she adhered to standard security measures - arguments they have made extensively in public. As CNN reported, one IT worker took a somewhat cavalier attitude, joking in one interview that a new 60-day retention policy was a "Hillary coverup operation" - which sparked the Trump campaign's anger.
"The fact an IT staffer maintaining Clinton's secret server called a new retention policy designed to delete emails after 60 days a 'Hillary coverup operation' suggests there was a concerted effort to systematically destroy potentially incriminating information," Trump spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement. "It's no wonder that at least five individuals tied to the email scandal, including Clinton's top State Department aide and attorney Cheryl Mills, secured immunity deals from the Obama Justice Department to avoid prosecution."
But perhaps the most interesting finding emerged from the "Miscellaneous" section in the Huma Abedin interview, in which it was revealed that none other than president Barack Obama had used a pseudonym in his communication with Hillary. In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was presented an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, dated June 28, 2012 with the subject "Re: Congratulations", Clinton's aide did not recognize the name of the sender.
"Once informed that the sender's name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: 'How is this not classified?'" the report says. "Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president's use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email."

State Department has refused to make public that and other emails Clinton exchanged with Obama. Lawyers have cited the "presidential communications privilege," a variation of executive privilege, in order to withhold the messages under the Freedom of Information Act. It is therefore unknown what the president's "alternative" email account was, or who hosted it.

Another curious discovery is the admission the Huma Abedin may have forward most if not all of her internal emails to her Yahoo email account "if she needed to print an email or document." In light of the recent revelation that half a billion Yahoo user accounts have been hacked definitively as of 2014 - and perhaps sooner - a quick scan through the dark web may reveal countless state department emails floating around in the hacked cloud, some perhaps originating from the president himself.

But going back to Obama's use of a psudonym to communicate with Hillary, this is especially notable because in a March 2015 interview with CBS, just after the NYT reported of Hillary's use of a private email server, the president said he had only learned about this from the press: in retrospect he may have known all along.

CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante asked Mr. Obama when he learned about her private email system after his Saturday appearance in Selma, Alabama. "The same time everybody else learned it through news reports," the president told Plante. "The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived," Mr. Obama said. "I'm glad that Hillary's instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed."

The president apparently had no problem that hillary would also delete some 15,000 emails despite a retention order, over which over 5,000 were work related.

At the time Hillary Clinton tweeted that "I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible." The president reiterated his support of these actions. Only later would it emerge that she deleted thousands of work-related and potentially confidential emails as part of the following infamous BleachBit purge.

As CBS quoted Obama then, "despite widespread criticism from Republicans who believe Clinton acted inappropriately, the president continued to defend his former Cabinet member's record. "Let me just say that Hillary Clinton is and has been an outstanding public servant. She was a great secretary of state for me," Mr. Obama said.

As it now emerges that Obama himself HAS lied when he told the AMERICAN PEOPLE.

He said that he did not know about Hillary's email server.. Like I said in my opening.

ITS TOME FOR DONALD TRUMP TO CALL FOR 200,000 People to Surround the White House and demand that Obama LEAVE... NOW!


The President lies.. His Department of Justice Covers up. His FBI obfuscates the Facts, His Military Leaders lie about the status of our forces, His IRS attacks Americans with impunity, His Secretary of State steals and obstructs Justice and gets away with it and the Congress is so scared and castrated that they watch it all happen and go along with the flow.

Congress should have resigned en mass at the first sign of this corruption. Instead they play the Kabuki Theater charade and bring shame to this GREAT COUNTRY.

Thomas Jefferson wrote about what needs to be done to William Stephens Smith

the people can not be all, & always, well informed. the part which is wrong [. . .] will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. if they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. we have had 13. states independent 11. years. there has been one rebellion. that comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. what country before ever existed a century & half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms. the remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. what signify a few lives lost in a century or two? the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it’s natural manure.



Chief_Ron said...

It all makes sense now. Why did Obama support Clinton in the email scandal? NOT because he was covering for her, but because he was protecting himself. And the FBI wasn't allowed to charge Clinton, an order that came down from The "Criminal" President.

Ben Ed said...

Does it ever stop? Soooo fed up with these people.

Hangdog said...

The complexity of this web of deception obfuscates the seriousness of the mishandling of classified information which is sufficient to jail the lot of them! When will justice prevail?

Anonymous said...

#doralgate awaits...and their fate is thus sealed

Anonymous said...

If Trump wins he won't live to do the job. The Clintons will see to that. Just look at all the government workers that must have been involved in this.

Anonymous said...


Unknown said...

The trash pile just gets deeper!!

cj said...

Drop the hammer on all now!


wow all of this corruption and crimes by obama and hillary yet they are walking free, DOES THIS MEAN THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAWS OF AMERICA??

Unknown said...

I still think that at the end of all this, even with all the evidence against all the participants, nothing will come of it. All of these criminals are too entrenched with all the rest of them, if not in action, in their inactions and possible, their knowledge of what was going on all the time. Everyone of these criminals knows what the other's involvement and to the extent they were involved. The only way anything will come of it, is to to break the hold the clintons have on everyone. They need one of the actors to give up and run for protection. Once that happens, the rest will come tumbling down. Whoever that one person is or will be, will not be easy to protect. Evil is all around us and they can get to them if anyone can.