THE FIRST ACT OF THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY??? Obama's first act as President EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 banning release of any of his records

THE FIRST ACT OF THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY???  Obama's first act as President EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 banning release of any of his records


EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 - - - - - - -

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release January 21, 2009
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 - - - - - - -
PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:
(a) "Archivist" refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee. (b) "NARA" refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.
(c) "Presidential Records Act" refers to the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.
(d) "NARA regulations" refers to the NARA regulations implementing the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.
(e) "Presidential records" refers to those documentary materials maintained by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including Vice Presidential records.
(f) "Former President" refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.
(g) A "substantial question of executive privilege" exists if NARA's disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security (including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.
(h) A "final court order" is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.
Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records. (a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege. However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative. (b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.
Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President. (a) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the Archivist, and such other executive agencies as they deem appropriate concerning whether invocation of executive privilege is justified.
(b) The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President, in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, may jointly determine that invocation of executive privilege is not justified. The Archivist shall be notified promptly of any such determination.
(c) If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President believes that the circumstances justify invocation of executive privilege, the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the President and the Attorney General.
(d) If the President decides to invoke executive privilege, the Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist, and the Attorney General in writing of the claim of privilege and the specific Presidential records to which it relates. After receiving such notice, the Archivist shall not disclose the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.
Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President. (a) Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this order that executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist's determination with respect to the former President's claim of privilege.
(b) In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order. The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.
BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE, January 21, 2009.

IN ADDITION TO THAT....
There have been over 100's Executive orders or modifications to Executive Orders put forth from Obama. He is creating a martial law ‘Disney Land’ of control covering everything imaginable. Some of the executive orders he has signed recently have been exposed thanks to ‘Friends of Conservative Action Alerts.’ They have compiled a choice list of ‘Emergency Powers, Martial law executive orders’: Get your headache medication out while you still can without a prescription.
* Executive Order 10990 allows the Government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
* Executive Order 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
* Executive Order 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.
* Executive Order 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
* Executive Order 11001 allows the government to take over all health education and welfare functions.
* Executive Order 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
* Executive Order 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
* Executive Order 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate and establish new locations for populations.
* Executive Order 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways, and public storage facilities.
* Executive Order 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issues over a fifteen-year period.
* Executive Order 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
* Executive Order 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute Industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
* Executive Order 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit, and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when the president declares a state of emergency, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
It is more than clear that Obama is planning for the total control and takeover of America via Martial Law. Food, energy, transportation, work, banking, and health…he has it covered.
While Obama is busy pulling executive orders out of the sky to control everything inside our country, he has been issuing executive orders to force us to submit to international regulations instead of our Constitution. Sher Zieve exposed this in one of her recent articles. Damn the U.S. Constitution, damn the American people and damn U.S. sovereignty.
We must send faxes, emails, and make calls to all congressman and demand they stop Obama’s perverted, extreme, and Unconstitutional abuse of Executive Orders. It is time to demand our elected leaders start protecting America, our sovereignty, and our Constitution. So far, they seem to be protecting the Obama – Marxist takeover plans…peppered with a little U.N. and Islam.

Obama supports Outsourcing Exec... and hobnobbed with the 1% kissing ass for that $25,000 a plate fund raising meal.

Hours after "in-sourcer-in-chief" speech, Obama fund raises at "ruthless" out-sourcer's penthouse at $25,000 a pop event

Immediately after bashing Mitt Romney for allegedly out-sourcing American jobs overseas at Bain and claiming he wants "to be a pioneer in in-sourcing," yesterday Obama's motorcade sped to the luxury penthouse of former Dell exec Tom Meredith, on record as priding himself in being "ruthless" in cutting American jobs in Texas and other states, while preserving them in Asia to cut costs for Dell.
See Buzzfeed for more. One would think the media might be interested in reporting Obama's brazen hypocrisy but I guess not. They're too busy clamouring for Mitt Romney's old tax returns.

After giving a speech in Austin, Texas in which he decried Mitt Romney for overseeing companies that outsourced jobs, President Obama attended a fundraiser hosted by Tom Meredith, a former Dell executive who once oversaw outsourcing at his own company — and said he would be "ruthless" about cutting costs.

In 2001, while serving as senior vice president of Dell Computer Corp, Meredith defended plans to lay off between 3,000 and 4,000 employees — largely in Texas — while sparing about 4,000 jobs in Asia Pacific. When that strategy was reported by the tech press at the time Meredith defended the move.
"We will be ruthless in how we address our cost structure," Meredith said, a comment that drew wide attention at the time.

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e2017616905834970c

BREAKING! Washington Times Columnist - Jeff Kuhner: Ballistic Over Arpai...

HOAX OF THE CENTURY!! If Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse are right about Obama's birth certificate, then the president has perpetrated the most elaborate hoax in U.S. history

If Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse are right about Obama's birth certificate, then the president has perpetrated the most elaborate hoax in U.S. history.

Jeffrey T Kuhner: Washington Times  July 19, 2012
Arpaio probe could dwarf Watergate
America may be facing a constitutional crisis. Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., has made a startling declaration: President Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent. If true — and I stress if — then this scandal dwarfs Watergate. In fact, it would be the greatest political scandal in U.S. history.

Recently, Sheriff Arpaio held a news conference. He said that his team of independent investigators — composed of former law enforcement officials and reporters — have for months meticulously examined the computer-generated birth certificate that Mr. Obama revealed to the public in April 2011. Their stunning conclusion: The document is a forgery. His chief investigator, Mike Zullo, says that the document is full of errors and omissions. In particular, Mr. Zullo claims that numeric sections are not filled out that otherwise would have been in birth certificates from Hawaii during that time. But other sections, such as those dealing with Mr. Obama’s race and his father’s work and field of study, are completed. Hence, Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative posse definitively believes the birth certificate is not authentic, but was manufactured to provide Mr. Obama with a veneer of constitutional legitimacy.

Sheriff Arpaio’s findings threaten to plunge America into an unprecedented crisis. For if — and again, I emphasize if — he is correct, then Mr. Obama has perpetrated the most elaborate hoax in U.S. history. A fraudulent birth certificate would mean that Mr. Obama is ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief. His presidency would therefore be legally and constitutionally illegitimate.

The consequences would shake the country to its very foundations. It would mean that he should be immediately removed from office — impeached. Moreover, every law and executive order passed under his administration — Obamacare, the economic stimulus, the Dodd-Frank financial reform, the government takeover of General Motors and Chrysler, the granting of amnesty to nearly one million illegal immigrants, the National Defense Reauthorization Act, the drone assassination list — would be null and void. The logic is inexorable: Should the president’s legal authority be deemed invalid, then everything resulting from it is also baseless. The Obama presidency would be overturned. Mr. Obama himself would be facing criminal charges — and possible jail time — for committing fraud.

Yet, the birth certificate issue would repeal more than the Obama administration. It would bring down the entire liberal regime. The ruling elites — the establishment media, the Hollywood left, the federal bureaucracy, the myriad regulatory agencies, the public sector unions, big banks and the financial sector — have refused to seriously examine Mr. Obama’s background. In fact, they have repeatedly propped him up. He defends the liberal corporatist status quo, constantly expanding government power. This is why they are determined to destroy anyone who seriously challenges Mr. Obama’s constitutional authority. To simply inquire into the status of his birth risks being called a “birther” — a kook and conspiracy theorist akin to Holocaust deniers. Having coddled and protected him, the ruling class could not survive if Mr. Obama was exposed as a slick con man. Their moral and intellectual legitimacy would be discredited as well.

The topic has become toxic. Even Fox News refuses to touch it. Many leading conservative radio talk-show hosts ignore it. The editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal mock so-called “birthers.” Meanwhile, the liberal media continues to vilify Sheriff Arpaio. He is being accused of racial profiling, committing civil rights abuses and having failed to effectively prosecute sex crimes. They allege he is waging a baseless, personal vendetta against Mr. Obama. Liberals are portraying him as a Southern stereotype: a racist, out-of-control sheriff determined to bring down a black president.

The very opposite, however, is the case. It was the citizens of Maricopa County who through a petition asked Sheriff Arpaio to investigate Mr. Obama’s birth certificate. The sheriff is not the only one with doubts. Many question the president’s status as a natural-born citizen. Mr. Obama’s grandmother says he was born in Kenya. This is echoed by Obama relatives. Members of the Kenyan parliament have repeatedly claimed Mr. Obama as their native son. The Kenyan media asserts he was born in Kenya. For nearly 15 years, Mr. Obama’s literary agent produced a pamphlet describing him as being “Kenyan born.” In his 2004 race for the U.S. Senate, wire stories — including by the Associated Press — frequently referred to Mr. Obama’s place of birth as Kenya. As late as 2009, the Kenyan government sought to build an official monument commemorating the site of Mr. Obama’s birth (until the State Department ordered the project be shuttered).

The president is a brazen opportunist; a political hustler who mastered his craft on the streets of Chicago. When it suited his interests to come across as a cosmopolitan, multicultural liberal, Mr. Obama pushed a Kenyan persona. When it was no longer politically expedient, he abandoned it. Yet, Mr. Obama cannot escape a fundamental dilemma: He either lied then or he is lying now. He was either born in Kenya (as he claimed during the 1990s and part of the 2000s) or he wasn’t (as he has insisted since 2007). Both cannot be true.

At best, Mr. Obama is a shameless liar. At worst, he is a foreign usurper.             

Jeffrey T. Kuhner is a columnist at The Washington Times and president of the Edmund Burke Institute.

CLICK LINK FOR ARPAIO NEWS CONFERENCE:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alVzyfptF80

Read more: http://times247.com/articles/82kuhner-arpaio-probe-could-be-bigger-than-watergate6#ixzz21CCO5xSC

Obama is not going to go quietly...Romney and the fat lazy establishment beware!!

Soetoro’s 2012 election contingency

- Doug Hagmann  Friday, July 20, 2012

Doug Hagmann  Friday, July 20, 2012

BLOOD SUCKING PARASITES... Michelle Obama's Trips Cost Taxpayers $1 Million to date!!

Michelle Obama's Trips Cost Taxpayers $1
Million Dollars To date!

WE MUST WIN THE SWING STATES !! Its a Fact that you can win the popular vote and still lose the elections through the electoral college!

CONSERVATIVES:......WE MUST WIN THE SWING STATES !!

WE MUST WIN THE SWING STATES !! Its a Fact that you can win the popular vote and still lose the elections through the electoral college!

RALLY YOUR FRIENDS IN THE SWING STATES AND HELP ANY WAY YOU CAN TO NOT MAKE THEM SWING SATES… PLEASE !!
Which ever State you live in …offer your services to the Local Tea Party Groups… to do satellite phone banks.. whatever you can. THIS IS OUR LAST CHANCE TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY

The 2nd Ammendment cannot be abridged becasue ... of the Dick Act of 1902

The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion).

These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada.

The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states.

Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states:

"The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it."

"This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose.

Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power."

The Honorable William Gordon

Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917

Obama the Fraud Hiding in plain sight...

SHOWN BELOW ARE THE FEW THINGS OBAMA HAS MADE PUBLIC... and below that..... THE FREAKING PAGES OF STUFF HE HAS SEALED/BLOCKED/LIED/DODGED/BULLSHITTED ABOUT WITH THE HELP OF THE LAP DOG LEFTY OLD MEDIA!

A fake autobiography -- an automythology really -- in the introduction, Obama acknowledged his use of pseudonyms, composite characters, approximated dialogue and events out of chronological order.  Obama's story as told by Obama, with a little help from his his unrepentant terrorist buddy, Bill Ayers, has more than a few holes in it -- and his relationships are extraordinary. A counterfeit short-form birth document posted on an Obot website that has never, ever, been examined by a qualified, independent examiner -- addressing the FactCheck.org document, Hawaii Department of Health spokesperson Janice Okubo told Politifact, "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents." And two old newspaper clippings that aren't even newspaper clippings, but microfiche/film copies that are proof of nothing.  In a court of law, these documents would be considered hearsay.  No one has ever seen these birth announcements in the original newspaper.  No one has ever documented the source or veracity of these announcements, but the Kenyan, Stanley Ann and little Barry never lived at that address -- especially in August 1961. Finally, after three years of stonewalling, Obama released what he claimed was his long-form "birth certificate."  The document was almost immediately demonstrated to have been electronically/digitally manipulated.  Outside of Team Obama, only Savannah Guthrie was ever allowed to examine the "original" document -- the one that was immediately accepted as 100% genuine by the ObamaMedia. But her photocopy of the document is hinkey!

AND HERE IS WHAT THE ASSHOLE IS HIDING...

Obama has lived for 50 years without leaving any footprints -- none!  There is no Obama documentation -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing. Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released (if one exists) Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released (lawyers' fees greater than $4,000,000 -- a REAL birth certificate is $15) Certification of Live Birth (short form) -- Released -- Counterfeit Certificate of Live Birth (long form) -- Released -- Counterfeit Amended Certification of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit INS air travel records August 1-7, 1961 -- Missing The Illinois State Archives told Judicial Watch that they never received any request from Senator Obama to archive any records in his possession.  In 2007, Obama told Tim Russert that his records were "not kept."And there's less on the web every day.  In time, the entire Obama body of knowledge will consist of 3 documents -- "Dreams From My Father" -- "The Audacity of Hope" -- and the latest -- "Change We Can Believe In" -- all written by Barack Hussein Obama or his "ghost-writers." Just an accident?  I don't think so, but the overriding question is what, and why?  What is Obama hiding?  And, why is he using such extreme measures to hide it? With his willing accomplices in the ObamaMedia, Obama has succeeded in evading the eligibility issue and seizing power. And we still don't know who the hell he is -- or where he comes from -- or who sent him. This is the original list -- it has been copied all over the Internet -- but this is the original source. Obama/Dunham divorce -- Released but incomplete (by independent investigators) Obama Sr. INS file -- Released -- both U. Hawaii and Harvard wanted him expelled for "womanizing" Barry Dunham/Obama Kindergarten records -- Records lost (this is a big one -- read two frames) Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released Anna Soetoro/Dunham passport records -- Released, but key years are missing Barry Dunham/Obama/Soetoro passport records -- Missing Soetoro adoption records -- Not releasedFransiskus Assisi School  School application -- Released (by independent investigators) Besuki School  record -- Released (by independent investigators) Punahou School application -- Missing Punahou School records -- Not released Noelani 3rd Grade records -- Not released Soetoro/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators) Selective Service Registration -- Released (by independent investigators) -- Under suspicion Social Security Numbers -- Released (by independent investigators) -- Under suspicion Occidental College records -- Not released Financial Aid Records -- Not released Passport Records -- Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser Columbia College records -- Not released Columbia thesis -- "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament" -- Not released Harvard College records -- Not released Harvard Law Review articles -- None Illinois Bar Records -- Not releasedBaptism certificate -- None (never baptized) Medical records -- Not released -- nor is the source of this nasty scar Illinois State Senate records -- None Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost -- really! Law practice client list -- Not released University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None Rashid Khalidi video -- Hidden by the L.A. Times White House Visitors list -- Incomplete to the point of worthless The Blagojevich Interview -- judge denies access to the FBI report The Osama bin Laden photos -- sealed by Obama The Fast & Furious documents -- Executive Privilege invoked

Obama’s Biography Is A State Secret In Canada

Obama is the most high-profile politician in recent history, the winner of a bruising election campaign in which every aspect of his life -- from his smoking habit to anti-American comments made by his pastor -- came under relentless scrutiny. But according to Canadian government officials, a biography of Barack Obama provided to Prime Minister Stephen Harper shortly after Obama's inauguration last January qualifies as a state secret. Broken link again, Obot scrubbers at work, but here is my cache copy.

Stanley Dunham's FBI File Reportedly Destroyed

Thomas Lifson is reporting that Stanley Dunham, the man Barack Obama called "Gramps", was monitored by the FBI, but like Obama, his paper trail has been obscured.  News comes from Cliff Kincaid, via the Christian News Service and Canadian Fee Press:      "The FBI confirms that a file was maintained on Obama's grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham," states Cliff Kincaid, the journalist who runs the public policy group, America's Survival, Inc. (ASI).  "This is a troubling development in the effort to understand the Marxism that drives Obama's policies as president today."        In correspondence with Kincaid, available at usasurvival.org, the FBI says the file was destroyed in 1997.  The FBI made the admission after Kincaid complied with a request to verify the identity of Dunham and the fact that he was deceased. Dubbed "Gramps" by Obama, Dunham has been depicted in news reports as a patriot who served in the U.S. Army in World War II.  But he had a close relationship with Communist Party USA (CPUSA) member Frank Marshall Davis in Hawaii, who reportedly drank and smoke pot with Dunham..... Davis was not only a communist but a pornographer who wrote a semi-biographical novel about having sex with a 13-year-old girl.  He mentored Obama for as many as nine years of his young life in Hawaii.           America has never had an occupant of the Oval Office so poorly vetted.  Keep in mind that Gramps stepped in and raised young Barry Soetoro after first his father and then his mother abandoned him.  Stanley Dunham functioned as the closest thing to a father Obama experienced.  The reasons the FBI thought he was worth watching will probably never be known, along with so much about Obama's background that might conflict with the carefully manufactured image that the MSM cooperated in selling to the American public, while ridiculing those who sought more information on the odd lacunae in Obama's paper trail.

Obama: Better Even Than Jesus

Squeeky, girl reporter, says, I am probably going to be struck by Lightning for mixing politics and religion, but I just got to thinking about something in the Bible.  The story of Doubting Thomas.  Here is the story from verses 24-28 of the 20th Chapter of the Book of John:      But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came.  The other disciples therefore said unto him [Thomas], We have seen the LORD.  But he [Thomas]said unto them, Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe. And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.  Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God.      Sooo, what I got to thinking about, is how Jesus, who even most Atheists admire as a person, was not too good to help resolve an identity question.  Jesus didn't get mad at Thomas, or call him crazy.  Jesus did not try to invalidate Thomas's feelings or make him feel guilty for wanting to see it for himself.  Jesus didn't put a law firm on retainer.  No, Jesus simply let Thomas touch his wounds and resolve his doubts. Since those days, spiritual beliefs are of necessity a matter of faith.  But faith has never been the primary modus operandi of government or of business or of life in general on the physical plane.  The IRS doesn't just take your word for it, and reserves the right to audit your tax return.  We sign contracts because both parties want the promises in writing.  And we like a receipt when we check out at the grocery store.  No, physical life on Planet Earth requires more than faith. And isn't it strange, that Obama, when faced with doubts from a significant number of Americans, can't or won't cough up one little piece of paper.  We don't have to wonder, "What Would Jesus Do?"  We can just read about it in the 20th Chapter of John, verse 24. . .

On Double Standards

John Edwards is accused of using $925K in campaign funds to hide his mistress. Barack Obama is accused of using over $3 million in campaign funds to hide his bona fides. Edwards has been indicted by the Justice Department. Obama is being defended by the Justice Department. Go figure!

TAXPAYERS PAID OBAMA LAW FIRM PERKINS-COLE LLP OVER 2.6 Million Dollars. Robert Bauer.. the Attorney is Married to ...ANITA DUNN!

Robert Bauer and Anita Dunn (Spouse) in Obama’s White House. Nepotism? Or Political Protectionism? UPDATE! Bauer is “IN”

TAXPAYERS PAID OBAMA LAW FIRM PERKINS-COLE LLP OVER 2.6 Million Dollars. Robert Bauer.. the Attorney is Married to ..YUP.. ANOTHER LEFTY... ANITA DUNN ( Of "her Favorite philosopher is Mao fame remember her??)

by John Gaultier ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obama eligibility lawsuits, Perkins Cole law firm, Obama for America April 2010 payouts, Obama not natural born citizen, Perkins Cole represents Obama
Obama eligibility lawsuits, Perkins Cole law firm, Obama for America April 2010 payouts
Let’s see, the last presidential election was in November, 2008.
Enquiring minds  want to know  Checked the April Quarterly expenditures for Obama For America. The Total Disbursements for that Period were $ 632,263.18.  Well over a third of that total, $ 261,206.69, was paid to the law firm of Perkins Cole.

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2010/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

Now let me see, where have I heard that name before…………

Oh yeah, one of the first times was back in 2008.
From the Philip J Berg lawsuit against Obama, et al and specifically a Certificate of Service from Mr. Berg filed on October 9, 2008.
“I, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, hereby certify that Plaintiff’s Response and Brief inth 2008 upon the following:”
Opposition to Defendants Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National
Committee’s Motion for a Protective Order Staying Discovery pending Decision on
Defendants Motion to Dismiss was served via electronic filing on the ECF System, this
9 day of October

“Robert F. Bauer, Esquire
General Counsel, Obama for America
PERKINS COIE
607 Fourteenth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005-2003
Telephone: (202) 628-6600 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting FREE (202) 628-6600 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Facsimile: (202) 434-1690
RBauer@perkinscoie.com

Attorney’s for Defendant’s
Barack Hussein Obama and
The Democratic National Committee”
Here is another reference to Perkins Coie representing OBAMA.
From the Gregory S. Hollister v Barry Soetoro, et al lawsuit, specifically the Barack Obama and Joseph Biden motion to dismiss, January 26, 2009.


“MOTION TO DISMISS OF
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AND VICE PRESIDENT JOSEPH BIDEN
Defendants President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden, through
counsel, respectfully move to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). The grounds for this motion are set forth in defendants’
Memorandum in Support of their Motion, which defendants incorporate herein by reference.”
 ”Respectfully submitted,
PERKINS COLE LLP
By: /s/ Robert F. Bauer
Robert F. Bauer
D.C. Bar No. 938902
rbauer@perkinscoie.com
607 Fourteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005-2003
Telephone: 202.628.6600 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting FREE 202.628.6600 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Facsimile: 202.434.1690
Attorney for Defendants Barack Obama and
Joseph Biden”
Oops, here’s another one.
From the James D. Schneller Petition for Writ of Mandamus dated December 17, 2008.

“Attorney: Robert F. Bauer, Esq.
Address: Perkins Cole
1110 Vermont Ave NW #1200
Washington, DC 20005
Phone No.:
Representing: Senator Barack Obama, Respondent”
For those far left Obama supporters spewing lies about Obama not spending money on attorneys.
Is that cool aid working for OBAMA?
Lest we forget, Obama has been using taxpayer dollars on government attorneys in addition to using law firms like Perkins Coie to keep hiding his birth certificate and college records. Any congressmen or judges out there paying attention? 

***Update at end of this blog****
First, if you haven’t read my FIRST blog about the Robert Bauer/Anita Dunn/Obama relationship go HERE.
THEN ADD THIS: Remember there is a CONNECTION between Perkins Coie and Obama.

Robert Bauer Relationships through Perkins Cole LLP (America Votes)

**Note Perkins Cole LLP is one of Obama’s lawyers in the “Birther” issue***

AT&T Wireless Services >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Boeing Company >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Craigslist >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Google Inc. >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Microsoft Corporation >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Nintendo of America >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

David T. Biderman >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Thomas L. Boeder >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Alexandra R. Cole >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Craig E. Courter >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Theresa Cropper >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Marc E. Elias >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Susan D. Fahringer >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Robert E. Giles >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Judy Gold >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Salim Ahmed Hamdan >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Stewart M. Landefeld >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Joseph E. Mais >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Guy R. Martin >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Chun M. Ng >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Roy W. Tucker >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Edward Wes >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Laura N. Whitaker >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

V.L. Woolston >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

13th Regional Corporation >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound >> through Perkins Cole LLP

America Votes >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Dragonslayers, Inc. >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

HRK Group, Inc. >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Navajo Nation >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Tamarack Resort LLC >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Western Urban Water Coalition >> through Perkins Cole LLP   >>

Robert F. Bauer campaign contributions:

(Donations of $3,000 or more during 2007-2008 cycle)

Obama for America – $3,600 on 7/31/2008

http://www.muckety.com/Robert-F-Bauer/30984.muckety

WHO IS   Salim Ahmed Hamdan?

 Guantanamo Bay prison – detainee

WHO supposedly is the alleged driver of OSAMA BIN LADEN.
IS Salim Hamdan one of the FIVE Gitmo detainees that Eric Holder of the Justice Deparment is bringing to the US to stand trial here?
The 9-11 Mastermind( confirmed) and possibly the alledged driver of Osama Bin Laden?

Re: AMERICA VOTES (connected to Perkins Cole)
America Votes is a national coalition of grassroots, get-out-the-vote organizations. Its website claims that the coalition represents “more than 20 million Americans in every state in the country” through its member groups. America Votes is itself a member of the “Shadow Party,” identified by DiscoverTheNetworks as a nationwide network of activist groups whose agendas are ideologically Left, and which are engaged in campaigning for the Democrats.
Member organizations of the America Votes coalition include, among others, the American Association for Justice; the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN); Campaign for America’s Future; Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund; Democracy for America; EMILY’s List; the League of Conservation Voters; the League of United Latin American Citizens; MoveOn.org Political Action; the NAACP National Voter Fund; NARAL Pro-Choice America; the Planned Parenthood Action Fund; Progressive Majority; the Service Employees International Union; the Sierra Club; and USAction.
The organization was launched on July 15, 2003. According to Texas Monthly (August 2003), Shadow Party leaders Harold Ickes Steve Rosenthal,  Ellen Malcolm, Andrew Stern, and Jim Jordan decided jointly to start America Votes and appointed Cecile Richards its first President. Richards also served on the Board of America Coming Together (ACT).Turner Foundation and Planned Parenthood, and finally as Deputy Chief of Staff for Democrat minority whip Nancy Pelosi, soon to become minority leader. Richards held that post for eighteen months before joining America Votes. (She held the presidency of America Votes from July 2003 to January 2006, when she was named President of Planned Parenthood.) George Soros’ son, Jonathan T. Soros, has donated $250,000 to America Votes. Many of the organization’s top donors, such as Rob McKay, Robert Glaser, and Andrew Rappaport, are associates of  Soros. Other major donors to America Votes include The Media Fund; Human Rights Campaign; Planned Parenthood Action Fund; Music for America; SEIU;  League of Conservation Voters; MoveOn.org Voter Fund; NARAL Pro-Choice America; AFL-CIO; Moving America Forward; American Federation of Teachers; Sierra Club; America Coming Together; and EMILY’s List.
Richards is the daughter of former Texas governor Anne Richards, whose political career was ended when George W. Bush defeated her in 1994. She harbors a deep antipathy toward the so-called “Christian Right,” which she held partly responsible for her mother’s defeat, and in 1994 founded the Texas Freedom Network, a grassroots organization aimed at countering the political influence of conservative Christians, especially on school boards. Richards subsequently moved to Washington, DC, where she served as Organizing Director of the AFL-CIO, then as a pro-abortion activist for the
 http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6527

Is Lady Justice truly blind?  Or is this current Administration trying to blindfold AMERICA as to what their true agenda/ideology is?
****UPDATE:

November 13, 2009

WH announces that DNC Counsel Bob Bauer will serve as WH Counsel by year’s end

Thirty minutes after White House Press Secretary refused to confirm the change in White House Counsel, the White House released the official statement announcing DNC Chief Counsel Bob Bauer will serve as White House Counsel by the end of the year, taking over for Greg Craig who is returning to private practice.

STRATEGY TO OUST OBAMA FROM OFFICE MUST HAVE FOCUS. POPULAR VOTE DOES NOT MATTER. ELECTRORAL COLLGE VOTES DO!

THE STRATEGY TO OUST OBAMA FROM OFFICE MUST HAVE FOCUS. POPULAR VOTE DOES NOT MATTER. ELECTRORAL COLLGE VOTES DO!

Please read and understand this concept. I can guarantee you Obama's handlers do.. so while Red State Patriots thump their chests and feel good about the prospect of a majority in those state.. we could lose the elections to this man again. Here is the information to absorb. Then understand it is our job to work with Patriots in the swing states to creat a winning majority IN THOSE STATES so we grab the ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES! GET IT ? PLEASE ?

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obama’s electoral college strategy, early predictions


As you know, presidents aren’t elected by winning the popular vote but  by winning the electoral college vote which is awarded state by state usually according to a winner takes all formula.  Each state gets a number of electoral votes equal to its number of Senators and Representatives.  Currently there are 538 electoral votes.  A candidate for president must receive the majority of those votes—or 270 votes—to win.


Larry J. Sabato, Director, U.Va. Center for Politics has taken a look at the electoral map for 2012.  Sabato estimates that as of now, Republicans have a lock or lead in 24 states for 206 electoral votes, and Democrats have or lead in 19 states for 247 electoral votes.  He breaks his count down this way:


Barring a Carter-like collapse, President Obama is assured of 175 electoral votes from 12 deep-blue states and the District of Columbia: California (55 electoral votes), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), Hawaii (4), Illinois (20), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), New Jersey (14), New York (29), Rhode Island (4), Vermont (3), Washington (12) and Washington, D.C. (3). Three more states are not quite as certain, but still likely Democratic: Maine (4), Minnesota (10) and Oregon (7). Even though Minnesota is competitive enough to vote Republican under the right set of conditions, it is the state with the longest Democratic presidential streak, dating to 1976.


Four other states usually end up Democratic for president, but the margins can vary considerably from year to year: Michigan (16), New Mexico (5), Pennsylvania (20 and Wisconsin (10). A low Hispanic vote in 2012 could flip New Mexico; Al Gore carried it by only 366 votes in 2000 and a concerted effort by George W. Bush flipped it in 2004. Deep-seated economic problems might cause Michigan to reconsider its party ties. Narrowly Democratic in 2000 and 2004, Wisconsin is a cauldron of unpredictable countertrends. Pennsylvania has frustrated all GOP attempts to win it over since 1988, yet recent polls have shown new weakness for Obama here. These 51 electoral votes will be GOP targets if conditions in the fall of 2012 approximate today’s.


Meanwhile, the Republicans have their own Red firewall. Almost any sentient GOP nominee will carry Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arkansas (6), Idaho (4), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (8), Mississippi (6), Montana (3), Nebraska (5), North Dakota (3), Oklahoma (7), South Carolina (9), South Dakota (3), Tennessee (11), Utah (6), West Virginia (5) and Wyoming (3). These 18 states have 105 electoral votes.


The Obama forces have bravely boasted that they can turn Arizona (11), Georgia (16) and Texas (38), mainly because of growing Latino vote power. After Democrats’ surprise victories in states such as Florida and Virginia in 2008, one shouldn’t reject these assertions out of hand. Still, with the economy in the tank, electoral claims on these big three will likely go the way of John McCain’s early declaration in ‘08 that California was within his grasp. Count another 65 Red votes here.


Four years ago even many optimistic Democrats didn’t really believe they would pick up Indiana (11), North Carolina (15) or an Omaha electoral vote in Nebraska, which like Maine awards one vote per congressional district. All three went for Obama by small margins. Indiana is very likely to desert Obama next time, as is the Cornhusker district, barring another big Obama victory. The Democrats chose Charlotte for their national convention, and they will make a big play to keep the Tar Heel state. As of now, that looks tough. Thus, Republicans lead for 26 more electors. Missouri was the sole squeaker that went for McCain; few believe it will be tight next year, and the GOP has those 10 votes, too.


Sabato says there will be seven swing states in the 2012 election:   Colorado (9), Florida (29), Iowa (6), Nevada (6), New Hampshire (4), Ohio (18) and Virginia (13).   So, these are the states to watch.  Keep in mind that according to Sabato, Obama can count on about 247 electoral votes.  Republicans can count on 206.  Obama needs 23 electoral votes to get to the magical 270 winning number.  Republicans need 64.  That means Obama has many more ways to win than the Republican.  For example, he could get over the top by just winning Florida or by winning Ohio or Virginia and a couple of the smaller swing states.  Republican have to win at least two of the big swing states or they are out of luck.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Read and understand that Patriots in key swing states have a bigger burden to help us win. Tell us what we need to do to support you ll there!

Study the MAP! Plan our strategy to win the war

Study the MAP! Plan our strategy to win the war!

WE MUST HAVE CLARITY OF PURPOSE...TO DEFEAT OBAMA!

WE MUST BE UNITED AND HAVE CLARITY OF PURPOSE TO DEFEAT OBAMA! PLEASE READ AND CONSIDER THIS NOTE!

MY THOUGHTS FOR THE DAY!

My Dear Friends and Fellow Patriots!…This is my opinion about the practical political reality in our choosing the next president of the United States who will save our Republic..... AT LEAST FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS !

Lets not EQUIVOCATE OR Bullshit ABOUT THE BOTTOM LINE ABOUT THE IMPENDING RESULT OF THE BATTLE ROYALE...  " LEFT VERSUS OUR SIDE".

1. Obama is and will be the Candidate on the Marxist/Progressive 39% of AMERICA...The Democratic Left
2. Like it or not Romney will most likely be the Republican Candidate. ( He was not my first choice or even my second Choice...BUT HE WILL BE MY CHOICE OVER HUSSEIN OBAMA!


The Candidates from our side who have fought well till now and and made all of them better must now decide what is in the best interest of the COUNTRY'S FUTURE.Who has the best chance of winning NOW....and who is the best financed to take on Obama? Romney ?
Santorum ?
Gingrich ?Paul ?After the Pennsylvania Primary or even before.... it is time for Conservatives to circle the wagons and start the fight against Obama and not spend our

OUR Time
Our Energy
Our Financial Resources to fight each otherObama will undoubtedly have close to a BILLION DOLLARS TO BEAT UP ON OUR NOMINEE.Unless you have the ability as an individual to pony up  $2500.00 which is the maximum contribution.... to a Candidate and you have thousands of others who are like minded and can create a PAC or Bundler group....Its time to start looking at the reality (as I have)  and  prepare and  plan for another battle  in  2016 IF THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE WINS AND IS NOT CONSERVATIVE ENOUGH FOR US!However...If we take our intra-candidate fight and extend it much longer, we will have a wounded candidate who will not have the time, money, or the integrity to wage a tough campaign with the firm belief that his side is 100% behind him. PATRIOTS WE NEED 100% OF OUR SIDE..110% BEHIND OUR NOMINEE!
( It's  like Hussein Obama... who when he goes to any military camp..MAKES OUR TROOPS DISARM.. before they can be in the room with him! BECAUSE HE FEARS his own troops! )
On the  National Geographic Channel and you may have seen two males of a species fighting for a female and they beat the shit out of each other.. trying to win....then a new male shows up and the two that have been fighting are so weak and cannot defend the prize ....that the new male shows up who is actually smaller and weaker and he wins the female by default because he is still  not bruised and battered and tired like the two who have been beating each other up. Lets not let that smaller weaker make be OBAMA!!LET US NOT BE IDIOTS NOW AND LOSE THE BIGGER BATTLE TRYING TO WIN AN INTERNECINE  FIGHTS!. WE MUST ENTHUSIASTICALLY SUPPORT THE PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OR PAY THE PRICE FOR OUR INTRANSIGENCE IN NOVEMBER!

It is my opinion that our first choice of candidate should have been planned for this election not in 2011 or 2012....but in 2009. Lets do better and plan for 2016 after the elections of 2012.


Here’s the way I look at it. It’s just my opinion! 

This metaphor should explain it pretty well!

Consider a man who has been condemned to die. (That’s our Country, being killed by Obama and his Cabal!)
This condemned man who has been unjustly convicted has one chance to get a “stay of execution”… but the lawyer who is going to get him that stay of execution has known to have been a bit of a scoundrel and  the condemned man does not like him too much!  There is very little chance (that without this lawyer) that the man will not be sent to the electric chair. So the condemned man has to make a choice to take Scoundrel Lawyer as his attorney and make the case for a stay of execution. He has a good chance if he does and so have time to prove his innocence!

Does the condemned man take the Scoundrel Lawyer or die based on his principles?

That is the choice!

OK you can poke holes in this metaphor with a bunch of alternative suppositions
(Maybe...The Cavalry comes in and rescues him or the hanging Judge and the jury are executed by a friendly force of rebels from an ancient Mayan Temple…… or some crazy stuff you can concoct to continue to hang onto your argument so you can validate the claim that  you do not like one of our Candidates!)…..but in the end…  IN MY OPINION  the condemned man should accept the lawyer and get the reprieve.

There are only the 3 candidates who can MAYBE beat Obama in this election cycle!!

I want the reprieve of the next 4 years for us to re-constitute our country. All our Candidates have  promised a 180-degree turn around from the Obama direction (which now guarantees the definite demise of America, as we know it!)

Will these candidates live up to their promises?? Who knows! There are no Guarantees as we found out with Obama!

Now I have seen different members of our group tear down a candidate based on conjecture and prognostication of what they will do if and when they are elected. All bad! Take them at their word for now... we have little choice.. The train is about to leave teh station!

Are we to believe them and vote for them? Or do we believe YOUR PETTY PROGNOSTICATIONS?

If so you must we believe that these candidates are pathological liars who will promise us things they have no plans to deliver?  If that is the depth of our cynicism, then why do we participate in this whole political process at all?  Pack up your tents, go home and have a deep long sleep and wake up to either a brand new day for America or … wake up in shackles!

The cold hard truth is that OBAMA WILL WIN… (If we did not give it our all to elect an alternative!)

Or we elect our Presumptive Nominee ...s.. This candidate gives us a 4 year reprieve during which we can at least get the chance to groom the “right” candidate… and redirect our country!

You must admit… we should take this reprieve and live….. than go down in defeat and lose our country in the name of  your particular brand of purity and principle.

If America dies… the last best hope for mankind is gone! No country has been looked up to by so many in the history of  the world!

I would cut off my right hand and live rather than die trapped by a rock.( like that movie recently!)  These are hard choices to make my brothers and sisters but ones we must make now!

"These are the times that try men's souls." This simple quotation is from Founding Father Thomas Paine. IT  not only describes the beginnings of the American Revolution it describes OUR TIMES! He communicated the ideas of the Revolution to common farmers as easily as to intellectuals, creating prose that stirred the hearts of the fledgling United States. He had a grand vision for society: We must too!

I request that all of you do not lose sight of the long term goals and spend too much time pontificating on past issues of ANY ONE OF OUR CANDIDATES and put them down so hard so as it would discourage even one other voter who could vote for our side to be swayed to sit home and not vote!

We cannot afford to have that happen in this election cycle… and that is why I humbly request that all of you look inside yourselves and answer the deeper question!

Do we at least want a reprieve or do we want to be just a "noble obituary"?

IT IS DOCUMENTED THAT AT THE CLOSE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION, a woman asked Benjamin Franklin what type of government the Constitution was bringing into existence. Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

CAN WE KEEP IT ???

Obama is tearing it apart… we need four years to recover and to resuscitate it! Can you all help to do that?  It’s up to each one of us!

In closing .. I am reminded of a quotation by Cicero who said a long time ago, “It is the character of a brave and resolute man not to be ruffled by adversity and not to desert his post.”

Let us not desert our posts and resort to petty squabbling! THE BATTLE LOOMS AHEAD AND WE MUST BE PREPARED!

LOCK ARMS AND MARCH FORWARD FELLOW PATRIOTS!

They came together to defeat King George. We must come together to defeat Obama!