Emails obtained by the House....reveal secret Obamacare deal with drug compnaies!!

‎*** THE LYING SACK OF SHIT OBAMA IS BUSTED AGAIN!!****
                                    FIRE HIS ASS

You look into this man's eyes and you see deceit. Pure unadluterated lying and deceit!!

ONLY CROOKS AND LIARS . ....AND SOCIOPATHS!!!  COULD ADMIRE THIS MAN

Remember how Pelosi and Obama and Reid pushed Obama Care? Also how transparent it was suposed to be.... ON C-SPAN ..well what Obama mean was ( C-SPIN = CROOK SPIN!! )
Emails obtained by the House....reveal secret Obamacare deal with drug compnaies!! Yes side deals to make sur ethey played ball with our money!! FUCKERS ALL OF THEM! We the people are being hoodwinked again !! AND AGAIN... AND AGAIN... SHARE THIS INFORMATION PATRIOTS...

>>>>>>> In a June 2009 email, President Obama’s point person on health care promised the pharmaceutical industry it would be protected against efforts to allow cheap drugs to be re-imported from Canada, because drug lobbyists had been “constructive” in their secret negotiations with White House officials.

The email is just one of thousands that House Republicans mined through as part of a more than a year-long investigation into Obama’s closed-door deal making with PhRMA, the drug industry lobbying group.

Though it was previously known that Obama had cut a deal with drug companies, a memo released today by the House Energy and Commerce Committee provides more specific details than have been previously reported.

The disclosures provide further evidence that once in office, Obama tossed aside his promises to be transparent and stand up to special interest groups.

Between May and August 2009, as the White House officials and key players in Congress were formulating the national health care law, the Obama administration held ongoing negotiations with PhRMA to secure industry support for the health care law as well as other policy concessions.

Nancy DeParle, then director of the White House Office of Health Reform, wrote the following email to PhRMA’s chief lobbyist on June 3, 2009: “Yes – I pushed this to everyone (Messina, Rahm) is in Egypt with POTUS but Phil Schrillo, Dana Singlser and I made decision, based on how constructive you guys have been, to oppose importation on this bill.”

At the time, Rahm Emanuel was White House Chief of Staff, Jim Messina was deputy chief of staff, Phil Schrillo was Obama’s legislative affairs director and Dana Singlser was his special assistant to the president for legislative affairs.

That September, top PhRMA lobbyist Bryant Hall reported in an email that he “had a good call w Messina,” and wrote: “Confidential: WH is working on some very explicit language on importation to kill it in health care reform. This has to stay quiet.”

Drug re-importation never made it into the final legislation.

As part of the final deal, PhRMA agreed to support health care legislation, spend millions on ads promoting it, and agree to $80 billion in savings and taxes to help finance the bill.

In exchange, PhRMA not only ended up with a law that promised to provide it with millions of new customers, but protected it against policies contemplated by Democrats that would have been harmful to their profits, such as introducing a government plan into the Medicare prescription drug program, allowing rebates for drug purchases through the program and drug re-importation.

Taken together, the emails paint a picture of insider deal making with a powerful special interest – something that stands in stark contrast to Obama’s campaign pledges.

In 2008, Obama ran an ad titled “Billy,” blasting then PhRMA president Billy Tauzin and the art of deal making in Washington. “I don’t want to learn how to play the game better, I want to put an end to the game playing,” Obama vowed.

Yet months into his presidency, Obama cut a deal with Tauzin’s lobbying group, and did so behind closed doors – a violation of his pledge to broadcast all health care negotiations on C-SPAN.
>>>>>>>

HERE IS THE LOWDOWN..... http://energycommerce.house.gov/news/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=9560

OBAMA SPOUTS A LOT OF BULLSHIT... HE IS THE TRAITOR IN CHIEF. HE IS UNPATRIOTIC

Four years ago today, Candidate Obama said it was "irresponsible" and "unpatriotic" to add $4 trillion in debt. But in just one term, President Obama has added a record $5 trillion in new debt, more than any president in American history. Change direction at http://www.gop.com/

LETS FIRE HIS ASS

OBAMA IS HELL BENT ON KILLING THE COUNTRY BY THE COAL INDUSTRY

U.S. Coal and the U.S. Economy

More Sharing ServicesShare | Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on print

FAST FACTS AT A GLANCE
Coal Powers the U.S. Economy

Coal mining provides jobs for the long-term.

• According to the National Mining Association, coal mining will need 50,000 new employees over the next 10 years, because of increasing demand for coal and retiring coal workers.¹
• Surface mining alone provides about 60,000 good jobs in Appalachia.²

Coal mining jobs fuel other jobs.

• For every coal mining job, an additional 3.5 jobs are created elsewhere in the economy.³
• In other words, coal mining keeps about 500,000 people – including an estimated 134,000 coal miners – on the job and earning a paycheck, so they can support themselves and their families.⁴

Coal mining jobs are well paid.

• The average mining wage is more than $66,000 per year, approximately 57 percent higher than the average wage for other industrial jobs.⁵
• U.S. coal mining generated $8.1 billion in personal income and payroll taxes in 2007⁶ – and billions more in property and other taxes – which are ultimately returned to taxpayers through vital government services such as K-12 education.

Surface mining is an economic driver.

• About 70 percent of U.S. coal production is mined using surface mining methods.
• The National Mining Association estimates the direct value of surface mining activity at more than $5 billion.  Billions more come from the purchase of mining equipment, costs for coal transportation, use of engineers and consultants, and tax payments to government.⁷

Coal is abundant and affordable.

• Coal supplies half the electricity consumed by Americans.⁸
• Surface mining operations alone provide enough energy to power more than 25 million American homes.⁹
• Electricity from coals costs Americans about 6 cents per kilowatt/hour, among the lowest electricity rates in industrialized nations.¹⁰ The national average price of electricity from all fuel sources is nearly 10 cents per kilowatt/hour.

Surface mining makes economic sense.

• Surface mining is safer and more efficient than underground mining.
• Surface mining has created much needed level land in Appalachia, while preserving the natural beauty of our mountains.
• Today, communities benefit from commercial developments such as shopping malls, airports and recreational facilities – all built as part of highly regulated, government-approved restoration and reclamation plans – leading to a higher quality of life and greater economic diversity and prosperity in the region.
  
  http://www.facesofcoal.org/index.php?u-s-coal-and-the-u-s-economy

Print this PDF document  and pass it around

http://www.facesofcoal.org/assets/files/flyer_stop_the_war.pdf

Private Jobs Down 4.6 Million From January 2008; Federal Jobs Up 11.4%

PATRIOTS... TEACHING YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT THE FACTS IS YOUR ROLE IN OVERTURNING THIS KENYAN'S RULE OF ECONOMIC TERRORISM!!
PLEASE SHARE.... EVERYWHERE! HERE ARE THE FACTS FROM THE GOVERNMENTS OWN STATISTICS!

Private Jobs Down 4.6 Million From January 2008; Federal Jobs Up 11.4%
By Ed Carson
... Fri., June 08, 2012 8:18 PM ET

President Obama’s statement Friday that the private sector is “doing fine” drew so much ridicule that he was forced to backtrack hours later. But it’s clear that Obama and many other Democrats see job problems — and solutions — starting and stopping with government employment.

A quick look at payroll stats shows that’s not the case.See More

Private-sector jobs are still down by 4.6 million, or 4%, from January 2008, when overall employment peaked. Meanwhile government jobs are down just 407,000, or 1.8%. Federal employment actually is 225,000 jobs above its January 2008 level, an 11.4% increase. That’s right, up 11.4%.

Private payrolls have been trending higher in the last couple of years while government has been shedding staff. But that’s because governments did not cut jobs right away. Overall government employment didn’t peak until April 2009, 16 months after the recession started. It didn’t fall below their January 2008 level until September 2010.

The recession was boomtime for federal employment, especially after Obama took office. Federal jobs kept rising (excluding a temporary Census surge in early 2010) until March 2011 — more than three years after overall payrolls peaked.

Obama’s 2009 stimulus did little to revive private jobs, but did funnel massive funding to state and local governments. That, however, only delayed the day of reckoning for states and cities to curb spending. They finally did significantly slash jobs in 2010 and 2011. But those layoffs have slowed to a crawl in recent months — averaging less than 3,500 job cuts a month since November.

It’s easy to argue that Obama’s tunnel vision on government employment reflects his complete lack of experience in the business world. But it’s also mainstream Democratic thinking.

The Wisconsin recall election was about liberals’ zeal to maintain government employees’ privileges far and above those of struggling private sector workers who pay their salaries.

Payroll change since January 2008

Total: -5.01 million -3.6%

Private: -4.61 million -4%

Government: -407,000 -1.8%

Federal Government: (excluding post office) +225,000 11.4%

Sources: Labor Department, Datastream

Update: Why does Obama think the private sector is "doing fine"? "We've seen record profits in the corporate sector." And high corporate profits are good for tax revenues to pay for government programs and government jobs. That's the main reason Obama cares about the private sector.

Follow Ed Carson on Twitter: @EdCarson1

http://blogs.investors.com/capitalhill/index.php/home/35-politicsinvesting/7190-private-jobs-down-46-million-from-january-2008-federal-jobs-up-114

Obama THE LIAR IN CHIEF.... promises during the campaign, guess how many he kept???...

OK THIS NEEDS TO BE PLAYED ON EVERY AMERICANS PC... CHECK OFF WHICH OF THESE PROMISES HE KEPT.
NOW.... THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GEORGE BUSH OR HIS WIFE'S BUSH... JUST WHAT IS COINING OUT OF HIS FILTHY LYING AFRI-FUCKING-CAN MOUTH !!

Just listen to all the blind, ignorant sheep clapping and yelling. The sheep are ripe for the slaughter! Instead of having him actually talking you should have the sound of the teacher from the Charlie Brown specials.

FIRE HIS ASS IN 2012...

 

George Sorros Home Address with Co-ordinates !!

INTERESTED IN GEORGE SORROS HOME ADDRESS ??
George Soros’s Home Address
Location:

136 Cantitoe St. Katonah, NY 10536-3804
...
Lat: 41.2374910 Lon: -73.6520730

HERE ARE PICTURES !!

http://virtualglobetrotting.com/map/george-soros-house/ 

 

See More

Google Maps Birds Eye Yahoo Maps
By:	tlp333 @ 2007-09-10 23:41:04 map #38727
Description:	This is the $9.8M property of the financial speculator, stock investor, philanthropist and political activist.
More Info:	en.wikipedia.org
Location:	Katonah, New York (NY), US @ 41.23749100, -73.65207300

 

 

Obama Whines: "Most People Would Acknowledge That I've Tried Real Hard"

Obama Whines: "Most People Would Acknowledge That I've Tried Real Hard"

Yes!  you have you freaking Kenyan Creep !! You have worked hard to destroy all that America stands for ...IN OUR WORLD...
SO NOW WE ARE GOING TO WORK "REAL HARD" TO FIRE YOUR FUCKING ASS!!

 

I suspect that most people in Cincinnati would acknowledge that I've tried real hard, and we haven't gotten the Republicans to engage on a whole range of issues that, I wish had happened," Obama said in an interview with WLWT-TV in Cincinnati, Ohio.

"Part of what I think needs to happen in this election is the voters once again have to send a message, 'We want common sense ideas. We don't folks who are just saying no to everything. Even stuff, traditionally [they] were in favor of," Obama said.


I SAY ....FIRE HIS ASS.... OR WORSE !!

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/07/07/obama_most_people_would_acknowledge_that_ive_tried_real_hard.html

HEY AFRICAN AMERICANS.... Are you smarter than a Third Grader? Dr. King was smart...how about you ??

Black Pastors Group: Pride in Obama Has Turned to Shame:
Obama has no history as being part of a family of slaves. He is the sone of a white trash communist and a Kenyan Socialist turned Muslim. So what do African American decendants of plantation slaves and Obama have in common... SKIN COLOR ..thats it !!

Friday, 06 Jul 2012 11:25 PM

By Todd Beamon

A coalition of African-American pastors is calling on blacks to boycott President Barack Obama and sign a petition demanding that the administration withdraw support for gay marriage.

The group, the 1,300-member Coalition of African-American Pastors, says it was snubbed by Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder when it demanded a meeting to discuss same-sex unions. The group had requested the meeting last month.

Rev. William Owens. (Getty Images)

“By embracing gay marriage, President Obama is leading the country down an immoral path,” Rev. William Owens, president of the Memphis-based coalition, said on Friday, The Washington Examiner reports. “Some things are bigger than the next election.”

The pastors are angered with Obama’s recent endorsement of gay marriage. But the president has not suggested that he would back federal legislation permitting same-sex marriage.

The coalition supports African-American pastors who believe marriage should be between a man and a woman.

“The black church has always been the conscience of America, and today we are calling on black pastors and black Christians to withhold support from President Obama until he corrects course,” Owens said.



“We were once proud of President Obama, but our pride has turned to shame,” Owens said.
© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Black Pastors Group: Pride in Obama Has Turned to Shame


HE IS NOT BLACK NOW IS HE ??? NOW HE IS HALF WHITE ???

Obama's Brethren....Suicide Bomber Auction for Syria in Saudi Arabia

An unbelievable leaked video of an auction for a suicide bomber against Syria!

Obama's MUSLIM  Brethren....Check this out...Suicide Bomber Auction for Syria in Saudi Arabia!!
This is how fucked up tye Musliim mind is across the world....!!
An unbelievable leaked video of an auction for a suicide bomber against Syria! This takes place in a hotel conference room in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The atmosphere is festive, and the audience has children in it. But the merchandise auctioned is human flesh and blood!
The video shows the father, Abu-Salah, attending the auction and offering his son
Khaled as a sacrifice This is his SECOND son to be sold as a suicide bomber.The father receives 1.5 million Riyals ($400,000) as
future compensation for his son's demise in Syria.At one point in the video, the father is elated at the high bids.
What kind of father sells his son? What kind of person pays to have a stranger blow himself up?

ONLY A MUSLIM !!!  FREAKING DOUCHEBAG RAG HEAD NUTJOBS!

**********************************************

TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY.... BALLOTS OR BULLETS ???

MALCOLM X  ( Obama's real Father ??? )  asked a simple question...in the 60's
NOW THE TABLES ARE TURNED AND WE PATRIOTS WILL ASK THE SAME QUESTION BACK...
TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY.... BALLOTS OR BULLETS ???
Your Comments !!

OBAMA'S ROOTS... RADICAL AS ALL HELL... ASK A NEWSPAPER REPORTER ABOUT THIS...! PLEASE SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE TO SWAY A MIND

PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE AGAIN.... IT PISSED ME OFF ABOUT THE PRESS IN 2008.... ITS STILL THE SAME. I WISH ALL OF US WOULD SEND THIS ARTICLE AS AN EMAIL TO EVERY NEWSPAPER IN AMERICA... AND ASK THEM...
"Have any of your reporters ever covered any of this material?"
July 8, 2008
What Barack Obama learned from the Communist Party
By Andrew Walden
American voters must make up their minds about what Barack Obama really believes in, if anything. His recent rhetorical concessions to the center further muddy the waters. So we must look to his past teachers and associates for help in understanding the inner Obama.

In his first series of national campaign commercials since securing the delegates needed to win the Democratic presidential campaign, Barack Obama struggles to re-introduce himself.  Images focus on the story of lessons learned from his grandparents and his mother, described in his book Dreams from my Father as "a girl from Kansas.... dab-smack, landlocked center of the country," in towns "too small to warrant boldface on a roadmap."  Speaking in Independence, Missouri, Obama tells his audience: "patriotism can never be defined as loyalty to any particular leader or government or policy."   ...
PLEASE READ AND SHARE THE REST OF THIS LONG REFERENCED ARTICLE !!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/07/what_barack_obama_learned_from.html

EXPOSED AGAIN !! OBAMA...Communists to the left of him Socialists to the right!! DAVID AXELROD'S COMMUNIST ROOTS.

David Axelrod’s Red Roots: Obama Adviser’s Communist Ties Exposed

From the cover story of the March print edition of The American Spectator!

Presidential historian Paul Kengor has dug up some fascinating facts about the background of David Axelrod, showing President Obama’s top political strategist to have deep ties to the American Communist Party (CPUSA) and other leftist individuals and organizations.
For example, Axelrod’s mother, Myril Bennett Axelrod, worked for the left-wing New York newspaper, PM. Although it lasted less than a decade (1940-48), PM became notorious because of its penetration by Stalinists and others who promoted the Communist Party line on issues both foreign and domestic. Kengor points out that PM‘s famed Washington correspondent, I.F. Stone, was subsequently identified as a Soviet agent both in the so-called “Venona” documents and also by a former top KGB official, Oleg Kalugin.
It is unclear where Axelrod’s mother fit in the orbit of Communists, Soviet sympathizers and other “progressives” who worked at PM, Kengor says, because despite “scouring reel upon reel of microfiche” copies of the newspaper, he was “unable to find a single article with Myril’s byline.” Nevertheless, her association with the paper locates her politics on the far-left fringe of the American politic spectrum in the 1940s, which would seem important to understanding her son’s later activities.
While a student at the University of Chicago in the early 1970s, David Axelrod began working as a political reporter for the Hyde Park Herald, which Kengor says brought Axelrod to the attention of Don Rose and David Canter. Both of these men were associated with the Communist Party and other far-left organizations.
Kengor explains that David Canter’s father, Harry Canter, was “an instructor at the Abraham Lincoln School, an infamous Chicago-based [CPUSA] front that instructed pupils in the teachings of Marx and Lenin.” David Canter followed in his Communist father’s footsteps, so that a 1970 congressional investigation report, “Guide to Subversive Organizations and Publications,” lists David Canter 25 times. His Chicago-based publishing company was believed to be partly subsidized by Soviet funds and in the 1960s, Kengor writes, “David Canter and Don Rose joined forces to start a [Chicago-area] community newspaper called Hyde Park-Kenwood Voices.”
This Canter-Rose publication “was on the far left,” Kengor writes. Hyde Park-Kenwood Voices editorialized for the abolition of the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC), whose investigations had exposed the pro-Soviet subversive activities of both David Canter and his father Harry. At a time when U.S. troops were fighting communism in Vietnam, Hyde Park-Kenwood Voices also published “pro-Hanoi screeds by [Students for a Democratic Society] members based in Chicago,” Kengor writes.
Don Rose was associated with SDS (the left-wing campus organization from which Bill Ayers’s terrorist splinter group Weather Underground spun off in 1969) and was also a member of the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam, commonly known by the slang term “the Mobe.”
Rose and Canter played a critical role as “mentors” to young David Alexrod, Kengor explains, citing numerous sources including David Canter’s son Marc Canter for the fact that it was a letter of recommendation from Don Rose that helped Axelrod land a job as a reporter for the Chicago Tribune. By 1987, all three of these men — Don Rose, David Canter and David Axelrod, who had left journalism to become a paid political adviser — were part of the campaign to re-elect Harold Washington as Chicago’s mayor.
Kengor’s American Spectator article is important because Axelrod’s background — like Obama’s associations with such left-wing figures as Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers — shows how ideas, policies and rhetoric originating in Marxist-Leninist doctrine and anti-American propaganda have been “mainstreamed” into Democratic Party politics.
Critics of Kengor’s investigative report will likely raise the charge of ”McCarthyism,” expecting us to miss the irony of that accusation because, of course, revelations from the Venona papers and other sources have largely vindicated Sen. Joseph McCarthy: There were Soviet agents in the U.S. government, and the American Communist Party was at all times an instrument of Soviet subversion.
What strikes me, in Kengor’s extensive account of Axelrod’s background (the article is more than 5,000 words long), is the remarkable degree to which Americans seem to have lost their horror of Communism in the post-Cold War era. There was a time when anyone with such clear connections to the world of Marxist subversion would have been regarded as an untouchable in mainstream American politics. But if a far-left agitator like Obama could be elected president, perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that no one is alarmed by the far-left background of his chief political strategist.

From: http://theothermccain.com/2012/03/04/david-axelrods-red-roots-obama-advisers-communist-ties-exposed/

OBAMA'S KISS OF DEATH.... STAY AWAY HE IS TOXIC !!

Friday, July 06, 2012

Ohio restaurant owner Ann Harris dies after Obama visit - Kind of like how our U.S. economy died after he was elected president.

Kind of like how Breitbart Died after he exposed Obama

Photo: Ann Harris, in a pink floral shirt, stands with her family

Friday morning, President Barack Obama ate a breakfast of eggs, bacon and wheat toast at Josephine "Ann" Harris' restaurant in Akron, Ohio. She met the president, and embraced him. A few hours later, she was dead. The Akron Beacon Journal said Harris, 70, apparently succumbed to a heart attack.

Obama, winging his way back to Washington aboard Air Force One, telephoned her daughter, Wilma Parsons, according to White House press secretary Jay Carney.

"The president expressed his sorrow and his condolences at the very sad event. He was honored to meet her this morning and passed on his feelings that the whole family is in his thoughts and prayers today," Carney told reporters. Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki read a statement from the campaign's Ohio director, Greg Schultz.

"We're extremely saddened by Ann's sudden passing this morning. Our sincere condolences go to Ann's family during this difficult time. As a small business owner, a mother, a grandmother, a great-grandmother, and a friend of many throughout the community, Ann led an exceptional life and will be missed by all who knew her. Ann and her family are in our thoughts and prayers." The President now wished he had paid for his meal.

"I'm sure this was her highlight," Frankie Adkins, Harris' sister, told the Akron Beacon Journal. "She loved Obama."


YUP... THE HIGHLIGHT WAS DEATH HUH ??? OBAMA IS TOXIC....

OBAMA AND HIS AFRICAN AMERICAN PROGRESSIVES AND THE LEFTY LIBERAL ASSLICKERS CANT RUN AN ECONOMY !!

OBAMA'S OWN CONGRESSIONAL Budget Office SAYS: Obama's Stimulus Failed on Jobs

By Paul Scicchitano

In a blow to the Obama administration, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has concluded that the president’s economic stimulus plan created fewer jobs than expected and “crowds out” private investment.

A new report the CBO released on Tuesday finds that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act may have boosted the economy in the short run by sustaining some 700,000 jobs at its peak in 2010 but “will reduce output slightly in the long run — by between 0 and 0.2 percent after 2016.”

The report estimates that the total number of jobs the plan produced was far fewer than the 3.5 million the Obama administration predicted during the peak of spending.

The CBO estimates that the stimulus is responsible for sustaining between 600,000 to 1.8 million jobs during this quarter, which lowered the nation’s unemployment rate by as much as 1 percent.

In July, the conservative Weekly Standard estimated that Obama’s stimulus package had cost taxpayers $278,000 for every job it created.

There was no immediate comment from the White House on the CBO report, but officials haveinsisted in the past that the economy would have fallen into a depression without the jobs act..

In September, White House press secretary Jay Carney called it “uncontestable” that the infrastructure projects the act created “were very well managed, came in on budget or under budget and led to the creation of many, many jobs” that would not have been created otherwise.

CBO, a nonpartisan agency, has re-evaluated the stimulus every three months with varying estimates of the total price tag — from $787 billion, up to $862 billion and now $825 billion.

The agency also has changed its model for the spending's impact on the economy, and the new calculations show that the act did less than originally projected.

CBO’s latest report reveals that the top-end decline of two-tenths of a percent is deeper than the agency predicted before the stimulus passed in February 2009, according to a report in The Washington Times.

At the peak of spending from July through September 2010, the American economy sustained between 700,000 and 3.6 million jobs, which lowered the unemployed rate between four-tenths of a percent to 2 percent, The Times reports.

An opinion piece in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution acknowledges that the stimulus failed to keep unemployment below 8 percent, as the Obama administration had projected, but blamed the discrepancy on a greater decline in the gross domestic prodcut than previously estimated.

“In short, in early 2009 we thought the economy had fallen off a ladder,” the article says. “In reality, it had fallen off a six-story building.”

© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Read more on Newsmax.com:

ALL THE LEFTIES WANT MORE STIMULUS MONEY..WHAT HAPPENED TO THE FIRST $729 BILLION FREAKING DOLLARS??

ALL THE LEFTIES WANT MORE STIMULUS MONEY..WHAT HAPPENED TO THE FIRST $729 BILLION FREAKING DOLLARS??Here's How Obama Spent $792 Billion On Fiscal Stimulus

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-stimulus-spending-2010-9?op=1#ixzz1zurEjEZ5

With Obama pressing forward another major round of stimulus, the real question is how much the president and his political posse have spent already, and which initiatives the allocated money actually funded.

From the beginning of our president's well-publicized First Hundred Days to the beginning of his days taking personal hits at GOP members, Obama has left behind a Keynesian trail of stimulus spending that spans 20 months.

And the total is, according to the Congress: $792 billion.

$36.9 billion for Aid to People Affected by Economic Downturn (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: For food stamps, rural housing assistance, child care aid for low-income families, and farm loans
Sample Programs:

• Special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children ($500 million)
• State re-employment services for the jobless ($250 million) 

*Source: ProPublica

$48.4 billion for Education (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: For job training grants, aid for schools, Pell Grants, and education administration costs
Sample Programs:

• Dislocated worker job training ($1.25 billion)
• Pell Grants for higher education ($15.8 billion)
• Head Start programs ($1 billion)
• Education for the disadvantaged - elementary and secondary education ($10 billion)

*Source: ProPublica

$324 million for Accountability (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: Accountability funds were funneled into various government departments to oversee the disbursement of stimulus aid and for general division operations
Sample Programs:

• Department of Agriculture - Office of Inspector General ($22.5 million)
• Recovery Act Accountability and Transparency Board ($84 million)
• Government Accountability Office salaries and expenses ($25 million)

*Source: ProPublica

$58.4 billion for Aid to State and Local Governments (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: To fund various legal, crime prevention, community outreach, economic development, and disaster assistance programs
Sample Programs:

• State Fiscal Stabilization Fund to avoid cutbacks and layoffs ($53.6 billion)
• State administrative expenses to carry out increase in food stamp program ($295 million)
• Violence against women prevention and prosecution programs ($225 million)
• Community Oriented Policing Services grants ($1 billion)

*Source: ProPublica

$41.4 billion for Energy (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: To support weatherization procedures, green energy ventures, and modernization of existing utilities systems
Sample Programs:

• Modernize electricity grid ($4.4 billion)
• Innovative technology loan guarantee program ($6 billion)
• Federal building conversion to "high-performance green buildings" ($4.5 billion)

*Source: ProPublica

$13.1 billion for Science and Technology (Recovery Act)

NASARobonautvia Flickr

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: To fund R&D on the national level, support security and facilities upgrades in the innovation space, and aid education measures to improve research functions
Sample Programs:

• National Science Foundation research and related activities ($2.5 billion)
• National Telecommunications and Information Administration ($4.7 billion)
• NASA exploration ($400 million)

*Source: ProPublica

$18.8 billion for Health Care (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: For the provision of health care and rehabilitation services to disadvantaged sectors of society, and for health care research funding
Sample Programs:

• National Institutes of Health fund to support scientific research ($7.4 billion)
• Construction, renovation, equipment and information technology for health centers ($1.5 billion)
• Department of Health and Human Services Prevention and Wellness Fund ($1 billion)

*Source: ProPublica

$870 million for Business (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: Primarily to support small business ventures
Sample Programs:

• Small business loans ($636 million)
• Rural Business - Cooperative Service: rural business program account ($150 million)

*Source: ProPublica

$98.3 billion for Transportation and Infrastructure (Recovery Act)

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: Perhaps the most diverse of the Recovery Act measures, transportation and infrastructure measures encompassed the construction of highways and other mass transit options, national park service upgrades, tax breaks on housing, etc.
Sample Programs:

• Highway infrastructure investment ($26.7 billion)
• Additional capital investments in low-income housing tax credit projects ($2.25 billion)
• Safe drinking water capitalization grants ($2 billion)
• High speed rail capital assistance ($8 billion)

$2.1 billion for Miscellaneous Recovery Act Programs

Date: February 13, 2009
Purpose: A smattering of stimulus measures - everything from Americorps to Census funding
Sample Programs:

• Census Bureau programs ($1 billion)
• Filipino World War II veterans compensation ($198 million)
• National Endowment for the Arts grants ($50 million)

$3 billion for Cash for Clunkers

Date: July 27, 2009 (de facto start date for the program, initial aid ran out after a week and a second round of "Cash for Clunkers" was passed by Congress on August 6, 2009)
Purpose: To give folks cash for their "clunkers" (cars beyond a reasonable degree of use) in order to circulate money into the hands of consumers and ultimately stimulate some spending while giving a boost to the automobile industry

$48.3 billion for Infrastructure (Jobs for Main Street Act)

Date: December 16, 2010
Purpose: To poach previously allocated TARP funding and funnel the money into creating jobs in targeted sectors of the US economy. The infrastructure arm will improve mass transit, schools, public housing, and clean water initiatives while adding jobs in these fields.
Sample Programs:

• Amtrak ($800 million)
• Clean water subsidies ($2 billion)
• Housing trust fund to provide rental homes for low-income families ($1 billion)

*Source: http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/legislation?id=0351

$26.7 billion for Public Service Jobs (Jobs for Main Street Act)

Date: December 16, 2010
Purpose: To create and maintain jobs in the public sector
Sample Programs:

• Education Jobs Fund to support approximately 250,000 education jobs over the next 2 years ($23 billion)
• Summer youth employment ($500 million)
• Law enforcement jobs ($1.2 billion)

*Source: http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/legislation?id=0351

$79 billion for Emergency Relief for Families (Jobs for Main Street Act)

Date: December 16, 2010
Purpose: Primarily for unemployment benefits, child care, and small business support
Sample Programs:

• Unemployment insurance, 6-month extension of benefits ($41 billion)
• Help with health insurance for unemployed workers (COBRA) ($12.3 billion)
• Child care tax credit ($2.3 billion)

*Source: http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/legislation?id=0351

$34 billion for the Extension of Unemployment Benefits

Date: July 22, 2010
Purpose: To extend funding for a variety of unemployment programs already in existence, although the bill famously does not grant additional aid to workers who have been employed over the 99-week federal limit

$30 billion for Small Businesses in Obama's Second Round of Stimulus Spending

Date: Pending approval
Purpose: To provide tax relief to small businesses burdened with the cost of starting up in an uncertain economic environment and ultimately to incentivize these businesses to innovate, expand, and provide jobs for the unemployed

$50 billion for Infrastructure Spending

Date: Pending approval
Purpose: For the construction and upkeep of roads, railways, and runways

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-stimulus-spending-2010-9?op=1#ixzz1zutqwwsl

AND IT ALL PRODUCED JACK SHIT !!! ALMOST ALL THE MONEY WENT TO KEEP HIS VOTING BLOCK OF UNION FOLKS, FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEMOCRAT VOTING BLOCKS FAT AND HAPPY FOR THE LAST 3  1/2 YEARS WHILE MIDDLE CLASS AMERICA SUFFERED WITH 8% + .. A NUMBER CALCULATED BY COUNTING THOSE UNEMPLOYED WHO HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR WORK ONLY FOR THE PAST 4 WEEKS!! 
ALL THE UNFORTUNATE FOLKS UNEMPLOYED LONGER... TOO BAD FOR YOU... YOU ARE NOT COUNTED... SO OBAMA CAN MAKE HIS DISMAL RECORD LOOK BETTER!

A PLAGUE ON HIM AND HIS HOUSE!!

COMPARE OBAMA AND REAGAN !!

One Year Later, Another Look at Obamanomics vs. Reaganomics

( OBAMA RECORD IS A PIECE OF SHIT...! )

February 2, 2012 by Dan Mitchell

On this day last year, I posted two charts that I developed using the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank’s interactive website.
Those two charts showed that the current recovery was very weak compared to the boom of the early 1980s.

But perhaps that was an unfair comparison. Maybe the Reagan recovery started strong and then hit a wall. Or maybe the Obama recovery was the economic equivalent of a late bloomer.
So let’s look at the same charts, but add an extra year of data. Does it make a difference?
Meh…not so much.
Let’s start with the GDP data. The comparison is striking. Under Reagan’s policies, the economy skyrocketed.  Heck, the chart prepared by the Minneapolis Fed doesn’t even go high enough to show how well the economy performed during the 1980s.
Under Obama’s policies, by contrast, we’ve just barely gotten back to where we were when the recession began. Unlike past recessions, we haven’t enjoyed a strong bounce. And this means we haven’t recovered the output that was lost during the downturn.

This is a damning indictment of Obamanomics
Indeed, I made this point several months ago when analyzing some work by Nobel laureate Robert Lucas. And it’s been highlighted more recently by James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute and the news pages of the Wall Street Journal.
Unfortunately, the jobs chart is probably even more discouraging. As you can see, employment is still far below where it started.
This is in stark contrast to the jobs boom during the Reagan years.

So what does this mean? How do we measure the human cost of the foregone growth and jobs that haven’t been created?
Writing in today’s Wall Street Journal, former Senator Phil Gramm and budgetary expert Mike Solon compare the current recovery to the post-war average as well as to what happened under Reagan.

If in this “recovery” our economy had grown and generated jobs at the average rate achieved following the 10 previous postwar recessions, GDP per person would be $4,528 higher and 13.7 million more Americans would be working today. …President Ronald Reagan’s policies ignited a recovery so powerful that if it were being repeated today, real per capita GDP would be $5,694 higher than it is now—an extra $22,776 for a family of four. Some 16.9 million more Americans would have jobs.

By the way, the Gramm-Solon column also addresses the argument that this recovery is anemic because the downturn was caused by a financial crisis. That’s certainly a reasonable argument, but they point out that Reagan had to deal with the damage caused by high inflation, which certainly wreaked havoc with parts of the financial system. They also compare today’s weak recovery to the boom that followed the financial crisis of 1907.
But I want to make a different point. As I’ve written before, Obama is not responsible for the current downturn. Yes, he was a Senator and he was part of the bipartisan consensus for easy money, Fannie/Freddie subsidies, bailout-fueled moral hazard, and a playing field tilted in favor of debt, but his share of the blame wouldn’t even merit an asterisk.
My problem with Obama is that he hasn’t fixed any of the problems. Instead, he has kept in place all of the bad policies – and in some cases made them worse. Indeed, I challenge anyone to identify a meaningful difference between the economic policy of Obama and the economic policy of Bush.

• Bush increased government spending. Obama has been increasing government spending.
• Bush adopted Keynesian “stimulus” policies. Obama adopted Keynesian “stimulus” policies.
• Bush bailed out politically connected companies. Obama has been bailing out politically connected companies.
• Bush supported the Fed’s easy-money policy. Obama has been supporting the Fed’s easy-money policy.
• Bush created a new healthcare entitlement. Obama created a new healthcare entitlement.
• Bush imposed costly new regulations on the financial sector. Obama imposed costly new regulations on the financial sector.

I could continue, but you probably get the  point. On economic issues, the only real difference is that Bush cut taxes and Obama is in favor of higher taxes. Though even that difference is somewhat overblown since Obama’s tax policies – up to this point – haven’t had a big impact on the overall tax burden (though that could change if his plans for higher tax rates ever go into effect).
This is why I always tell people not to pay attention to party labels. Bigger government doesn’t work, regardless of whether a politician is a Republican or Democrat. The problem isn’t Obamanomics, it’s Bushobamanomics. But since that’s a bit awkward, let’s just call it statism.

OBAMA THE DISMAL JOB MAKER...So now he will blame the Chinese??? Hel Who Knows!

Another Month of Data Re-Confirms Obama’s Horrible Record on Jobs

Posted by Daniel J. Mitchell

Remember back in 2009, when President Obama and his team told us that we needed to spend $800 billion on a so-called stimulus package?
The crowd in Washington was quite confident that Keynesian spending was going to save the day, even though similar efforts had failed for Hoover and Roosevelt in the 1930s, for Japan in the 1990s, and for Bush in 2008.
Nonetheless, we were assured that the stimulus was needed to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent.
Well, that claim has turned out to be hollow. Not that we needed additional evidence, but the new numbers from the Labor Department re-confirm that the White House prediction was wildly inaccurate. The 8.2 percent unemployment rate is 2.5 percentage points above the administration’s prediction.

Defenders of the Obama administration sometimes respond by saying that the downturn was more serious than anyone predicted. That’s a legitimate point, so I don’t put too much blame on the White House for the initial spike in joblessness.
But I do blame them for the fact that the labor market has remained weak for such a long time. The chart below, which I generated this morning using the Minneapolis Fed’s interactive website, shows employment data for all the post-World War II recessions. The current business cycle is the red line. As you can see, some recessions were deeper in the beginning and some were milder. But the one thing that is unambiguous is that we’ve never had a jobs recovery as anemic as the one we’re experiencing now.

Job creation has been extraordinarily weak. Indeed, the current 8.2 percent unemployment rate understates the bad news because it doesn’t capture all the people who have given up and dropped out of the labor force.
By the way, I don’t think the so-called stimulus is the main cause of today’s poor employment data. Rather, the vast majority of that money was simply wasted.
Today’s weak job market is affected by factors such as the threat of higher taxes in 2013 (when the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts are scheduled to expire), the costly impact of Obamacare, and the harsh regulatory environment. This cartoon shows, in an amusing fashion, the effect these policies have on entrepreneurs and investors.
Postscript: Click on this link if you want to compare Obamanomics and Reaganomics. The difference is astounding.

********************************************************************************

Send this man Hussein Obama to the gallows for the number suicides and hearbreaks he has caused while he chases his Socailist Cause!!

OBAMA GUN CONTROL THROUGH THE UN... THIS ASSHOLE WILL DO EVERYTHING HE CAN TO UNDERMINE AMERICA!!

The Global Gun Control Threat
By DICK MORRIS
Published on DickMorris.com on July 6, 2012


Dear Friend,
Click Here to sign the petition to stop the US from signing the Arms Trade Treaty!
On July 27th, the nations of the world are scheduled to meet in New York to sign a global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).  Disguised as a way to prevent the proliferation of small arms throughout the world, it is, in fact, a backdoor way to legislate gun control in the United States and effectively repeal our Second Amendment.

The ATT will set up a global body which will require all nations to regulate firearms so that they can prevent their exportation to other countries.  Inevitably, this will require countries to inventory the guns in private hands and to register them.  A gun ban is not far away.

The ATT, under the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, would have the power of a constitutional amendment and would, effectively, repeal the Second Amendment guaranteeing us the right to bear arms.  We must fight to stop the US from signing the treaty and, if we fail, block Senate ratification.

Please sign the petition and include your name and address so we can send it to your Congressman and Senators.

Click Here to sign the petition to stop the US from signing the Arms Trade Treaty!

Thanks very much,

Dick Morris

FIGHT TO KEEP YOUR RIGHT

Government Pilot Program Testing Illegal Alien Amnesty !! WHO THE HELL IS THIS GOVERNMENT

FROM JUDICIAL WATCH: TOM FITTON

JW Sues DOJ for Records Detailing Government Pilot Program Testing Illegal Alien Amnesty

Many citizens in the cities of Baltimore and Denver might be surprised to learn that they provided a "testing ground" for the Obama administration's dangerous (and unlawful) policy of suspending the deportations of illegal aliens last year.

But that's exactly what happened. And Judicial Watch has initiated an investigation of the matter. On June 11, we filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Obama Department of Justice seeking records pertaining to this six-week pilot program designed to test the Obama administration's new "standards" for the dismissal of immigration charges against certain illegal aliens. The Obama administration tested the program first in the cities of Baltimore, Maryland and Denver, Colorado beginning on December 4, 2011.

Here's what we're after specifically pursuant to our original November 23, 2011 FOIA request to the Executive Office of Immigration Review ("EOIR"), a component of the Justice Department:

i. Any and all records regarding, concerning or related to the six-week pilot program in Baltimore and Denver that is scheduled to begin on December 4, 2011 and under which the immigration-related charges against certain undocumented residents may be subject to dismissal. This request includes, but is not limited to, any and all policy guidelines, implementation plans, training materials, and directives regarding the pilot program.

ii. Any and all records of communication between any official, employee or representative of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and any official, employee or representative of any other government agency, office or department (including, but not limited to, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Executive Office of the President, the City of Baltimore, and the City of Denver) regarding concerning or related to the pilot program.

The Justice Department acknowledged receiving our FOIA request on November 28, 2011 and was required by law to respond by January 11, 2012 at the latest. As of the date of our lawsuit, however, the Obama administration has failed to turn over any records responsive to the request, indicate which records are exempt from disclosure, or notify Judicial Watch when a response is forthcoming.

And so, we filed a lawsuit to prod them into action.

If you've been reading this space for some time, you know that this "suspended deportation" controversy has been unfolding now for over two years.

It all began on June 30, 2010, when John Morton, Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent a memo to all ICE employees instructing local immigration officials to use their discretion in "prioritizing" illegal immigration deportation cases. (The memo was leaked to the press and caused a massive uproar.)

On June 17, 2011, John Morton followed up with another memo to all field officers, special agents and to the chief counsel further defining the term "prosecutorial discretion," which, in essence, asked immigration officials to focus deportation proceedings on illegal aliens convicted of crimes. However, Judicial Watch uncovered documents proving immigration officials considered suspending the deportation of illegal aliens convicted of violent crimes.

In November 2011, as reported by CNN, the Obama administration announced that on December 4, 2011 it would begin a pilot program in Baltimore and Denver to "test the process for reviewing cases pending before the immigration court." Details regarding this program were sparse, prompting JW's investigation. 

The Obama administration has been playing games with its immigration policy from the beginning in its attempt to evade Congress and implement illegal alien amnesty. First Obama administration officials tried to implement stealth amnesty outside of the public eye, and then when the cat was out of the bag, they doubled down on the policy in open defiance of the law.  (An alien who fails to register after 30 days with ICE and keep registration papers on their person is in criminal violation of the law - and can be jailed for up to 30 days - in addition to being deported. This administration is ignoring and condoning this mass criminality.)  We know that any number of illegal aliens who receive "get out of jail free cards" from the Obama administration will go on to commit additional crimes, including murder.  Obama's stealth amnesty and sanctuary policies will result in the killing of innocent Americans as surely as night follows day.

And on Friday, June 15, 2012, the Obama administration doubled down again, announcing it would no longer deport unlawfully present immigrants under age 30 who came to the United States as children, a policy described by Politico's Steve Friess as "a temporary, de facto implementation of a part of the stalled DREAM Act," that sends "a loud message to Hispanic voters to remember Obama in November." 

The American people are tired of the obfuscation and gamesmanship from the Obama administration on such a serious issue: especially when they can plainly see this is all for political purposes. The message to the Obama administration is simple: No more secrecy. No more games. Obey the law. Release the records.

Until next week...



Tom Fitton
President

Obama- The road to Facism...Occupy/Takeover America

COMING SOON IF YOU DON'T ACT