Showing posts with label ECONOMY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ECONOMY. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Obama..THE DEFINITION OF A SOCIALIST!!... Hardwork does not pay....The governement is your Benefactor!

Obama Believes that Government who gets money from Hardworking people..by way of TAXES.... is the great benefactor!
THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF A SOCIALIST DICTATOR!!


Check out these facts:
TAKE WALMART FOR EXAMPLE OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE:...

A PRIVATE GLOBAL COMPANY .... Vs... THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING MONEY!!

1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day.


2. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute!

3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. Patrick's Day (March 17th) than Target sells all year.


4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target +Sears + Costco + K-Mart combined.


5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people, is the world's largest private employer, and most speak English.


6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the world.


7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger and Safeway combined, and keep in mind they did this in only fifteen years.


8. During this same period, 31 big supermarket chains sought bankruptcy.


9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world.


10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had five years ago.


11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur at Wal-Mart stores. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.)


12. 90% of all Americans live within fifteen miles of a Wal-Mart.


You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the ground work for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to fix the economy.


This should be read and understood by all Americans… Democrats, Republicans, EVERYONE!!


To President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature


It is now official that the majority of you are corrupt morons:


a.. The U.S.
 Postal Service was established in 1775.  You have had 234 years
to get it right and it is broke.
 


b.. Social Security was established in 1935.  You have had 74 years to get it
right and it is broke.
 

c.. Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 71 years to get it right
and it is broke.


d.. War on Poverty started in 1964.  You have had 45 years to get it right;
$1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the
poor" and they only want more.


e.. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965.  You have had 44 years
to get it right and they are broke.


f.. Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 39 years to get it right
and it is broke.


g.. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence
on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion
a year and we import more oil than ever before.  You had 32 years to get it right
and it is an abysmal failure.


You have FAILED in every "government service" you have shoved down our
throats while overspending our tax dollars.


AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED
WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? 


Folks, keep this circulating. It is very well stated.  Maybe it will end up in the e-mails of some of our "duly elected' (they never read anything) and their staff will clue them in on how Americans feel.


AND


I know what's wrong.  We have lost our minds to "Political Correctness" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Someone please tell me what the HELL's wrong with all the people that run this country!!!!!!




We're "broke" & can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless etc.,???????????


We are providing aid to Haiti , Chile , and Turkey..And now Pakistan and even the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD!

Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!!










Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed income' receive no aid nor do they get any breaks…

AMERICA: a country where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed hungry, elderly going without 'needed' meds, and mentally ill without treatment -etc,etc.





Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave 'US' the same support they give to other countries. Sad isn't it?

 OBAMA ONLY GIVE HIS BUDDIES "OBAMA MONEY"..THAT TOO FROM YOUR TAXES.... NOT FROM HIS OWN POCKET



Monday, July 16, 2012

The Big Failure: Obama By The Numbers. Intentional KILLING OF AMERICA... THIS IS NO STUPID MISTAKE!

The Big Failure: Obama By The Numbers. Intentional KILLING OF AMERICA... THIS IS NO STUPID MISTAKE!

THESE ARE HIS NUMBERS AND THE LEFTY MEDIA AND THE BIG LOSER BLAMES EVERYONE BUT HIS ACTIONS. OH NO THE MAGIC NEGRO IS ALWAYS TOO CLEAN. ITS ALL SOMEONE ELSES FAULT !!

$45.4 Trillion:  
Total Federal Spending Proposed By Obama’s FY2013 Budget Through 2022. (CBO, 3/16/12)
$25.9 Trillion:  
Projected Federal Debt In 2022 Due To Obama’s Binge Spending. (OMB, 2/13/12)
$15.7 Trillion:  
Current National Debt ($15,724,907,364,995.04). (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 6/2/12)
$10.3 Trillion:  
Amount Obama’s FY2012 Budget Would Add To The Debt Through FY2022. (OMB, 2/13/12)
$6.4 Trillion:  
Cumulative Deficits Over FY2013-2022. (CBO, 3/16/12)
$5.10 Trillion:  
Added To The National Debt Since Obama Took Office. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 6/2/12)
$4.8 Trillion:  
Total Interest Payments On The National Debt Due To Obama’s Proposed Budget, FY2013-2022. (CBO, 3/16/12)
$2.6 Trillion:  
True Cost Of ObamaCare Once Fully Implemented. (Office Of The Speaker Of The U.S. House Of Representatives, Report, 1/6/11)
$1.9 Trillion:  
Higher Taxes In Obama’s Budget. (OMB, 2/13/12)
$1.75 Trillion:  
Annual Cost Of Federal Regulations. (Small Business Administration, September 2010)
$1.416 Trillion:  
Federal Budget Deficit For FY2009 – Highest In U.S. History. (CBO, 10/7/10)
$1.298 Trillion:  
Federal Budget Deficit For FY2011 – Second Highest In U.S. History. (CBO, 10/7/11)
$1.294 Trillion:  
Federal Budget Deficit For FY2010 – Third Highest In U.S. History. (CBO, 10/7/10)
$1.253 Trillion:  
Projected Federal Budget Deficit For FY2012. (CBO, 3/16/12)
$1.18 Trillion:  
Total Cost Of Obama’s First Stimulus With Interest.  (CBO, 1/31/12, CBO, 1/27/09)
$1.17 Trillion:  
American Debt Held By China. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 6/4/12)
$831 Billion:  
Price Tag Of Obama’s First Failed Stimulus. (CBO, 1/31/12)
$575 Billion:  
Amount Of Medicare Cuts In ObamaCare. (CMS Chief Actuary Richard S. Foster, Memo, 4/22/10)
$491.7 Billion:  
Amount Of Taxes In ObamaCare. (Letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, 3/18/10; Joint Committee On Taxation, 3/2/10)
$447 Billion:  
Price Tag Of Obama’s Second Stimulus. (The White House, 9/8/11)
$347.1 Billion:  
Debt Service Costs For Borrowing To Pay For Obama’s First Stimulus. (CBO, 1/27/09)
$231 Billion:  
Burden Of New Regulations Imposed In 2011. (American Action Network, 1/2/12)
$175 Billion:  
Increased Spending In Obama’s Second Stimulus. (CBO, 10/5/11)
$150 Billion:  
Taxpayer Funds For Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac. (Reuters, 3/25/12)
$116 Billion:  
Amount Of Regulatory Burden For 2012, At The Current Pace. (American Action Forum, 5/29/12)
109.6 Million:  
Amount Of Paperwork Burden Hours Imposed By Federal Government Regulations Since January 1, 2012.  (American Action Forum, 5/29/12)
$24 Billion:  
Stimulus Funds Sent To Tax Cheats. (Government Accountability Office, April 2011)
$21.7 Billion:  
Amount Government Expects To Lose On Bailouts Of Auto Industry. (Treasury Department, 5/10/12)
$1.3 Billion:  
Amount Taxpayers Will Not Recover From Bailout Of Chrysler. (FactCheck.org, 6/6/11)
$535 Million:  
Stimulus Loan To The Failed Solar Company Solyndra. (The Oakland Tribune, 11/4/10)
133 Million:  
Annual Paperwork Burden Hours Imposed By Regulators In 2011. (American Action Network, 1/2/12)
49.1 Million:  
Number Of Americans Living In Poverty (Supplemental Poverty Measure). (US Census Bureau, 11/7/11)
46.4 Million:  
Record Number Of Americans Receiving Food Stamps. (Department Of Agriculture, Accessed 6/4/12)
46.2 Million:  
Record Number Of Americans Living In Poverty (Official Measure). (U.S. Census Bureau, 9/13/11)
$18 Million:  
Cost Of The Stimulus Website Recovery.org. (ABC News’ “The Note,” 7/8/09)
12.7  Million:  
Unemployed Americans. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
8.1 Million:  
Americans Working Part-Time For Economic Reasons. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
6.3 Million:  
Number Of Americans That Fell Into Poverty Since Obama Took Office.  (U.S. Census Bureau, 9/13/11)
5.6 Million:  
As Of March 2012, Number Of Mortgages Either 30 Days Delinquent Or In Foreclosure. (Lender Processing Services, 5/22/12)
5.4 Million:  
Americans Unemployed 27 Weeks Or Longer. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
4 Million:  
Workers Granted Waivers So That ObamaCare Would Not Outlaw Their Health Care Plan. (HHS.gov, Accessed 4/10/12)
2.3 Million:  
Foreclosure Starts During 2011. (Lender Processing Services, 1/20/12)
1.59 Million:  
Personal Bankruptcies In 2010. (United States Courts, 2/15/11)
$1.5 Million:  
Stimulus Funds Sent To Indonesia To Discourage Air Pollution In Jakarta. (The Daily Caller, 7/7/11)
1.35 Million:  
Personal Bankruptcies In 2011. (Los Angeles Times, 1/5/12)
1,042,000:  
Construction Jobs Lost Since Obama Took Office. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
830,000:  
Americans That Have Given Up Looking For Work. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
599,000:  
Manufacturing Jobs Lost Since Obama Took Office. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
552,000:  
Jobs Lost Since Obama Took Office. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
$278,000:  
Cost Per A Stimulus Job. (The Weekly Standard, 7/6/11)
97,000:  
New Foreclosures Filed In May. (Politifact, 5/28/12)
89,000:  
The Number Of Stimulus Checks Sent To Dead Or Incarcerated People. (The Wall Street Journal, 10/7/10)
81,405:  
Record Number Of Pages Added To The Federal Register In 2010. (Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2011)
76,300:  
Number Of Heavy And Civil Engineering Construction Jobs Lost Since The Stimulus Was Passed. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
$50,932:  
Your Share Of The National Debt. (U.S. Treasury Department Accessed 6/4/12; U.S. Census Bureau, Accessed 6/4/12)
45,696:  
Pages Of New Rules Added To The Federal Register During Obama’s First Two Years In Office. (Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2011)
23,000:  
The Number Of Jobs Obama Knew His Drilling Moratorium Would Kill. (The Wall Street Journal, 8/21/10)
$16,512:  
Increase In Your Share Of The National Debt Since Obama Took Office. (U.S. Treasury Department Accessed 6/4/12; U.S. Census Bureau, Accessed 6/4/12)
$15,500:  
Annual Cost Per Household From Federal Regulations. (Small Business Administration, September 2010)
        $11,300:  
Negative Effect Of Debt On Gross National Product Per Person In 2035. (CBO, 6/22/11)
$10,585:  
Cost Per Employee That Federal Regulations Place On Small Businesses. (Small Business Administration, September 2010)
3,700:  
Number Of Tax Delinquents Who Received Stimulus Funds. (Government Accountability Office, April 2011)
2060:  
Year Federal Spending Will Reach 50 Percent Of GDP. (CBO, 6/22/11)
2037:  
Year That Federal Debt Will Reach 200 Percent Of GDP. (CBO, 6/22/11)
2036:  
Year That The Social Security Trust Fund Will Be Exhausted. (The Trustees Of Social Security & Medicare, 5/10/11)
2022:  
Year That The CBO Predicts Medicare’s Trust Fund Will Be Exhausted. (CBO, 4/10/12)
1,722:  
Number Of Waivers Granted To Unions And Businesses So That ObamaCare Would Not Outlaw Their Health Care Plans. (HHS.gov, Accessed 6/4/12)
1,603:  
Number Of Regulations That Would Impact Small Businesses Proposed By Obama Administration In First Two Years In Office. (Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2011)
1,137:  
Days Since Harry Reid’s Senate Has Passed A Budget Resolution. (S. Con. Res. 13, Roll Call 173; 4/29/09)
408:  
Number Of Regulations Proposed By Obama During First Two Years That Have An Economic Impact Of Over $100 Million. (Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2011)
360:  
Individuals In The Obama Administration Have Been Through The Revolving Door. (Center For Responsive Politics, Opensecrets.org, Accessed 6/4/12)
106.2%:  
Federal Debt As A Share Of GDP At The End Of 2013. (CBO, 2/13/12)
92:  
Number Of Bank Failures In 2011. (FDIC, Accessed 6/4/12)
83%:  
Percent Of Americans Who Describe The Economy Negatively. (ABC News/Washington Post Poll, 1,004A, MoE 3.5%, 5/17-20/12)
80%:  
Small Businesses That Could Be Forced To Change Health Care Plans As A Result Of ObamaCare. (NFIB, 7/11)
80%:  
Percent Of Americans Who Say Obama Has Either Made The Deficit “Worse” Or “Not Made much Difference.” (NBC News/Wall Street Journal, 1000A, MoE 3.1%, 5/16-20/12)
79%:  
Stimulus Funds For Wind, Solar And Geothermal Energy Projects That Went To Foreign Firms. (Investigating Reporting Workshop/ABC’s World News Tonight/Watchdog Institute, 2/8/10)
72.5%:  
Federal Debt Held By The Public As Share Of GDP By End Of The Year. (CBO, 1/31/12)
66%:  
Percent Of Americans Say That Barack Obama Has Either Made The Economy “Worse” Or “Not Made Much Difference.” (NBC News/Wall Street Journal, 1000A, MoE 3.1%, 5/16-20/12)
52%:  
Percent Of Americans Who Disapprove Of Obama’s Handling Of The Economy. (NBC News/Wall Street Journal, 1000A, MoE 3.1%, 5/16-20/12)
49.1%:  
“Percent Of The Population That Lives In A Household Where At Least One Member Received Some Type Of Government Benefit In The First Quarter Of 2011.” (The Wall Street Journal, 5/26/12)
40:  
Record Number Of Straight Months With Unemployment Rate Above 8 Percent. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
39.7:  
Number Of Weeks That It Takes To Find A Job. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
31.0%:  
Unemployed Workers Out Of Work For Over A Year. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
18%:  
Amount GNP Would Be Lowered Due To Debt’s Effect On Economic Growth By 2035. (CBO, 6/22/11)
17%:  
Cut To Medicare Benefits When Trust Fund Is Exhausted. (House Ways & Means Committee Hearing, 6/22/11)
15.1%:  
Americans Living In Poverty. (U.S. Census Bureau, 9/13/11)
8.2%:  
Unemployment Rate. (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Accessed 6/4/12)
4.11%:  
Percent Of Mortgage Loans In Foreclosure During December 2011. (Lender Processing Services, 1/27/12)
4:  
Record +$1 Trillion Deficits On Obama’s Watch. (OMB, 2/13/12)
3.8%:  
Decline In Home Prices In The Past Year. (CNN Money, 3/27/12)
2.5%:  
Decline In Median Home Sale Price In The Last Year. (National Association Of Realtors, 1/20/12)
2.3%:  
Decline In Median Household Income In 2010. (U.S. Census Bureau, 9/13/11)
0:  
Other People Obama Will Have Left To Blame For The Failures Of His Economic Policies In 2012. (The American People, 11/6/12)

Read more: http://www.gop.com/index.php/briefing/comments/the_big_fail_obama_by_the_numbers1#ixzz1xkKEcz4A

BARACK THE MAGIC NEGRO

Obama is driving us hard into the ravine of Poverty and "Third Worldism". Its the dream of his Father and all his Mentors!

The Obama Watch

THE DEATH OF AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT!

A Second Term Will Be Terminal

Another four years of Obamanomics and Argentina will be crying for us.
With a second term for Obama, the world-leading America we have known and hoped to leave to our children will be gone. Last Friday's jobs report confirms that Obama is well on his way to transforming America into a third world country, with declining living standards and perpetual economic stagnation.
Argentina enjoyed the world's fourth highest per capita GDP in 1929, on par with America at the time. But then the nation lost its way in embracing a leftist, union allied government, which took control of the economy and imposed wildly irresponsible taxes, spending, deficits, and debt. After World War II, the hugely popular Juan Peron came to power and institutionalized the madness. It has been all downhill for Argentina ever since. Do you recognize the pattern?
Today, Argentina ranks 53rd in the world in per capita GDP, according to the International Monetary Fund, 57th in the CIA World Factbook, at a level less than one third that of America. But its national debt at 51% of GDP is actually less than that of the United States under the Obama administration, where we are rocketing towards 100% of GDP by the end of this year, and 200% in 25 years, according to CBO.
The Worst Economic Recovery Since the Great Depression: ConfirmedLast Friday's jobs report indicated the most commonly cited U3 unemployment rate remains stuck at 8.2%. That makes 41 straight months of unemployment over 8%, which the Joint Economic Committee of Congress confirms is the worst recovery from a recession since the Great Depression almost 75 years ago. The total number of Americans unemployed actually rose over the last 3 months by 76,000, 54 months after the recession started, and 3 years after it was supposedly over. Since the Great Depression, and before this last recession, recessions in America have lasted 10 months on average, with the longest previously lasting 16 months.
Indeed, the last time before Obama that unemployment was even over 8% was December 1983, when Reaganomics was bringing it down from the Keynesian fiasco of the 1970s. It didn't climb back above that level for 25 years, a generation, which is a measure of the spectacular success of Reaganomics. That success was centrally based on reducing tax rates, which our ignorant Marxist President says was tried but didn't work.
Moreover, Obama's June unemployment rate was not much, much higher only because over 7.2 million working people have given up even looking for work as a hopeless waste of time under President Obama, so they are not counted as unemployed in the U3 unemployment rate. Including these workers, who still exist and still do not have jobs, the unemployment rate would be 11%.
Besides the 12.7 million Americans who are counted as unemployed, another 8.2 million were employed part-time for economic reasons. "These individuals were working part-time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job," the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported. Another 2.5 million workers were marginally attached to the labor force, as they "wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months," but "[t]hey were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the [prior] 4 weeks."
That leaves the total army of the unemployed and underemployed at 23.4 million Americans. Counting these workers, the BLS reports the U6 unemployment rate as rising to 14.9% in June. If we add in the long-term discouraged workers that the BLS does not even count anymore, the Shadow Government Statistics website reports the total unemployment rate increasing to 22.8% in June.
In contrast, Obama promised us when he first entered office that if his nearly $1 trillion in stimulus spending passed, the unemployment rate would never exceed 8%, and would decline to 5.8% by May of this year, when in reality it was 8.2% and rising that month. The peak of the Obama Presidency came in February 2009, his first month in office, which is the last time he said something correct about the economic recovery, predicting to Matt Lauer on national television, "If I don't have this done in three years, then this is going to be a one-term proposition." We are now well past Obama's own self-imposed deadline.
The unemployment rate for African -Americans actually rose last month to 14.4%, and it has remained at such depression era levels for Obama's entire Presidency. Hispanics have suffered double digit unemployment throughout Bush's Presidency as well, at 11% again last month. For teenagers, the rate last month stood at 23.7%. For black teenagers, unemployment rose last month to 39.3%. For Hispanic teenagers, the unemployment rate rose to 31%.
Friday's labor report further indicated that the jobs picture has only been worsening under Obamanomics. A million more workers were suffering long-term unemployment of 27 weeks or longer in June than at the supposed end of the recession 3 years ago. Moreover, the median length of unemployment had risen to 19.8 weeks in June compared to 17.2 when the recession supposedly ended.
How Stupid Do They Think We Are?Obama tells us that the 80,000 jobs created last month (25,000 were mere temp jobs) were "a step in the right direction." A very tiny baby step at best, as the working age population grew by 191,000 in the same month. Moreover, 85,000 went on the disability rolls during the month, fleeing the Obama economy for their only alternative, taxpayer dependency. Another 275,000 applied for disability during the month.
Obama's chief economic policy advisor Alan Krueger actually boasted that private sector jobs have grown for "28 straight months for a total of 4.4 million payroll jobs during that period." But at the same point during the Reagan recovery, the economy had created 9.5 million new jobs.
Krueger thinks we are too stupid to know that job growth is the norm and not the exception for the American economy. In the 62 years from the end of World War II in 1945 until 2008, jobs grew in 86% of the months, or 640 out of 744. His statement is just a further example of the Obama administration's practice of Calculated Deception.
Reagan's recovery produced job growth in 81 out of its first 82 months, with 20 million new jobs created in those first 7 years alone, increasing the civilian work force at the time by 20%. That grew into 50 million new jobs over the entire Reagan 25 year boom from 1982 to 2007. Compare that to the disgrace of Obamanomics. While Obama tries to claim 4.4 million new jobs created, total jobs today are still half a million less than in January 2009 when he entered office. Even George Bush oversaw 52 consecutive months of job growth, including 8 million new jobs created after his 2003 capital gains and dividends tax rate cuts became effective (which Obama is dedicated to reversing).
Krueger also solemnly told the public, "it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." But as documented July 6 by Bryan Preston for PJMedia, the Obama Administration has said the exact same thing for each of the last 30 months. Do ya think 2 ½ years might constitute a trend?

The Disgrace of ObamanomicsObama's tragic jobs record reflects the dismal economic growth under his Administration's perverse economic policies. For all of last year, the economy grew by a paltry real rate of only 1.7%, only about half America's long-term trend. The average so far this year has been no better.
In sharp contrast, in the second year of Reagan's recovery, the economy boomed by a real rate of 6.8%, the highest in 50 years. During the first 7 years alone, the economy grew by almost one-third, the equivalent of adding the entire economy of West Germany, the third largest in the world at the time, to the U.S. economy. Real per capita disposable income increased by 18% from 1982 to 1989, meaning the American standard of living increased by almost 20%. The poverty rate, which had started increasing during the Carter years, declined every year from 1984 to 1989, dropping by one-sixth from its peak.
But President Obama, following the exact opposite of the policies of Reagan in every detail, is on exactly the opposite course. The Census Bureau reports falling real wages under Obama, kicking median family income back over 10 years. Census also reports more Americans in poverty today than at any time in the more than 50 years that Census has been tracking poverty. That is why Obama can also boast an all-time record number of Americans on food stamps, which is why Newt Gingrich has rightly labeled him "the food stamp President."
Obama cannot explain away this disgrace of Obamanomics by arguing that the economy has performed so poorly under his Administration because the recession he inherited from Bush was so bad. That is exactly what he is arguing when he says "there are no quick fixes to the problems we face that were more than a decade in the making." But the American historical experience is that the worse the recession, the stronger the recovery, as the American economy snaps back to its world-leading, long-term, economic growth trend line. Based on this historical record, we should be enjoying the third year of a raging economic recovery boom right now.
This historical experience was reflected by the surging Reagan recovery boom from the deep 1981-1982 recession. And it is why Obama was confident enough to tell Matt Lauer and the nation in 2009 that if he doesn't have the economy hopping after 3 years, he is going to be a one-term President. If anything, because of the severity of the recession, Obama should have been blessed with an even more booming recovery than Reagan. But the dismal economic performance we have suffered instead, with no real recovery from the steep 2008-2009 recession at all, is the disgrace of Obamanomics.
The Coming Crash of 2013
For the first time on Monday, Obama indicated that the Bush tax cuts may not be made permanent for those making less than $200,000 a year. For why would he otherwise propose only a one-year extension of those tax cuts? If he terminates those tax cuts after one year, that would constitute yet another tax increase on the middle class, besides Obamacare.
This partial one-year extension of the Bush tax cuts will not do anything to promote the economy. Temporary tax relief does not work in any event to advance economic growth, because it is discounted by investors, consumers, and businesses as only a passing fad. But extending the Bush tax cuts for those making less than $200,000 per year would not be a tax cut from the current rates, but only an extension of the same rates that have been in force for 10 years or more. So there is no boost to the economy from that. Note that these are the tax cuts adopted by Bush and the Republicans for those making less than $200,000 per year, contrary to Obama's claims that Bush and the Republicans only cut taxes for "the rich," which are only despicable, manipulative lies so dishonest that they should disqualify Obama from office.
Indeed, instead of adopting tax cuts promoting the economy, Obama's tax proposal on Monday would terminate the Bush tax cuts for those making over $200,000. So it would only trash the economy, because it would involve a huge tax increase on the nation's small businesses, job creators, and investors. Counting the tax increases of Obamacare that will also go into effect next year under current law, the top two income tax rates would increase by nearly 20%, the capital gains tax rate would increase by nearly 60%, the tax on dividends would nearly triple, and the death tax would rise from the grave with a 55% top rate. While Obama says only 3% of small businesses would be affected, the tax increases would apply to close to two-thirds of small business income, which is the foundation for most jobs.
This is all on top of the corporate tax rate which under President Obama is the highest in the industrialized world at nearly 40%, counting state corporate rates on average. Even Communist China offers a 25% corporate rate. The social welfare states of the European Union are even lower on average, with formerly socialist Canada now featuring a 15% corporate rate, and economic powerhouse Germany not much higher.
American businesses are uncompetitive in the global economy with this tax burden. But under President Obama, there is no relief in sight. Instead, he has been barnstorming the country for the last two years calling for still more tax increases. Under his so-called Buffett Rule, which would double the capital gains tax, America would suffer the fourth-highest capital gains tax rate in the industrialized world, besides the world's highest corporate tax rate.
When you add up all those multiple tax rate increases on top of Obama's exploding regulatory costs, the result will be to push the economy back into recession next year, with unemployment soaring back over double digits, and the deficit soaring to new all time records over $2 trillion, the highest in world history. It is working people who will be hurt the most, because they are the ones who will lose the jobs they need for their basic standard of living. Even those with jobs will suffer further declining real wages and incomes because of the shredded demand for labor.
There is no economic theory under which increasing tax rates promotes economic growth and recovery, particularly rate increases on job creators and investors. Even under Keynesian economics, such tax increases are contractionary. Indeed, even Karl Marx would tell you that such tax rate increases would bring a market economy down, not up.
Obama falsely claims he is only restoring the Clinton era tax rates. But Obama is well beyond that now, because he is imposing the Obamacare tax increases next year as well, and he has been proposing still further tax increases. The top marginal income tax rates that drive the economy would consequently soar by well over 30%, probably close to 40% or more.
Obama says we tried the Bush tax cuts for "the rich" and they didn't work. So let's review how exactly they did work out. Bush cut the top income tax rate by 11.6%, from 39.6% to 35%, and the second highest rate by about 8%, from 36% to 33%. But he cut the lower rates by higher percentages, including slashing the bottom rate by 33%, from 15% to 10%. Then in 2003, he cut the tax rates on capital, reducing the capital gains tax rate by 25% from 20% to 15%, and the tax rate on corporate dividends to 15% as well.
These tax rate cuts first quickly ended the 2001 recession, despite the contractionary economic impacts of 9/11, and the economy continued to grow for another 73 months. After the rate cuts were all fully implemented in 2003, the economy created 7.8 million new jobs over the next 4 years and the unemployment rate fell from over 6% to 4.4%. Real economic growth over the next 3 years doubled from the average for the prior 3 years, to 3.5%.
In response to the rate cuts, business investment spending, which had declined for 9 straight quarters, reversed and increased 6.7% per quarter. That is where the jobs came from. Manufacturing output soared to its highest level in 20 years. The stock market revived, creating almost $7 trillion in new shareholder wealth. From 2003 to 2007, the S&P 500 almost doubled. Capital gains tax revenues had doubledby 2005, despite the 25% rate cut!
Consequently, the Bush tax cuts helped to extend the Reagan boom for 25 years, until 2008. By then, the government had induced the financial crisis, through regulations looting the banks for subprime mortgages demanded in the name of affordable housing for the poor and minorities, and through the Fed's cheap dollar monetary policies, which began the restoration of perverse Keynesian economics. Punishment for the results is now long overdue for the advocates of those policies.

About the Author

Peter Ferrara is Director of Entitlement and Budget Policy for the Heartland Institute and General Counsel of the American Civil Rights Union. He served in the White House Office of Policy Development under President Reagan, and as Associate Deputy Attorney General of the United States under the first President Bush. He is the author of America’s Ticking Bankruptcy Bomb (HarperCollins).

Obama The Dumb ASS.. never worked in Business so he puts Entrepreneurship down all the time... WHAT A SHITHEAD !!

Entrepreneurship means risk. The risk of walking away from security and career path to create something new. The risk of taking yourself and your family into an unfamiliar storm of stress and uncertainty. The risk that you've miscalculated an opportunity, or your own internal resources as you plunge into a new venture.

Friday, July 13, 2012

OBAMA OUTSOURCED... $ 95 THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS

Obama’s Outsourcing Far Worse Than Romney’s....  Taking our Tax money and paying European Banks 95 BILLION.... Is the WORST!!

CAN YOU Freaking Believe this shit ????
Thats $ 95 THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS

ONE TRILLION DOLLARS!! Obama on Track for Fourth Straight Year of Trillion-Dollar Deficit !

ONE TRILLION DOLLARS!! Obama on Track for Fourth Straight Year of Trillion-Dollar Deficit ! See what the staggering numbers are !!


US Debt Visualized in $100 Bills
United States owes a lot of money. As of 2012, US debt is larger than the size of the economy. The debt ceiling is currently set at $16.394 Trillion, estimated to be hit around Sep 14, 2012.


The U.S. budget deficit grew by nearly $60 billion in June, remaining on track to exceed $1 trillion for the fourth straight year.
Through the first nine months of the budget year, the federal deficit totaled $904.2 billion, the Treasury Department reported Thursday.
President Barack Obama is almost certain to face re-election having run trillion-dollar-plus deficits in each of his first four years in office. That would likely benefit his opponent, GOP presumptive nominee Mitt Romney.
Obama and congressional Republicans remain at odds over how to lower the deficit. Unless their disagreement is broken, a series of tax increases and spending cuts could kick in next year. Economists warn that could dramatically slow an already weak U.S. economy and even tip it back into a recession.
The Congressional Budget Office predicts the deficit for the full year, which ends on Sept. 30, will total $1.17 trillion. That would be a slight improvement from the $1.3 trillion deficit recorded in 2011, but still greater than any deficit before Obama took office.
One positive sign this year is the deficit is growing more slowly than last year.
In June it was 6.8 percent behind the pace for the same period in budget year 2011. And a key reason for that is that revenues are up 5.2 percent this year, while spending is down by 0.9 percent.
But the modest improvement has not cooled the budget debate in Washington.
Obama submitted a budget request to Congress in February that sought $4 trillion in deficit reduction over the next decade through a combination of spending cuts and tax hikes.
A key part of his proposal is to allow tax cuts to expire for couples earning more than $250,000. He has called for extending similar cuts for people earning less than that.
Obama would also set a 30 percent tax rate on taxpayers making more than $1 million.
Republicans have rejected the tax increases. They want more cuts in government programs. The GOP-controlled House has approved a budget that calls for deep cuts in Medicare and other programs and a new round of tax cuts that would favor wealthy Americans.
The House-approved spending plan has no chance of passing in the Senate, where Democrats hold a slim majority. That sets the stage for gridlock until after the November elections when lawmakers will be faced with a number of end-of-the-year deadlines.
Romney has proposed broad but largely unspecified spending cuts. He would reduce the federal work force by 10 percent and keep the tax cuts for all incomes, not just families making less than $250,000.
Romney also wants to drop all tax rates by 20 percent. He would curtail deductions, credits and exemptions for the wealthiest to pay for the lower rates, but he does not specify what tax breaks would be trimmed.
Tax cuts approved during President George W. Bush's administration are scheduled to expire at the end of December. In addition, a set of automatic spending cuts totaling about $1.2 trillion over 10 years are scheduled to kick in. Both parties oppose the automatic spending reductions because they include deep cuts in defense.
However, they have been unable to reach an agreement so far on alternative spending cuts or tax increases that would keep the automatic cuts from taking effect.
The International Monetary Fund warned that the U.S. economy could suffer another recession if Congress doesn't do something to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff." The impact could shave 4 percentage points off U.S. growth, the IMF said.
© Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Obamacare Headlines Are GROSSLY Misleading... A GREAT READ

 A GREAT READ !!!
Craig Andresen

Today’s Obamacare Headlines Are GROSSLY Misleading

By Craig Andresen on July 12, 2012 at 7:36 am

Yesterday, in the House, yet another vote to repeal Obamacare was held. It was the 33rd time such a vote was taken in the House since the passage of the bill nobody could know what was in until they passed it.
33 times in the house.
How many times has this been debated in the Senate?
Zero.
That’s because Harry Reid, just as he’s done with 30 some odd jobs bills passed in the House and all the various budgets passed in the House…Refuses to allow them to see the light of day in the Senate.
Liberals and socialists love to tell you that it’s the republicans obstructing congress or doing nothing in congress but, they’re lying.
The headlines today will read something to the effect of, “REPUBLICANS VOTE FOR OBAMACARE REPEALED…AGAIN” or…”REPUBLICANS PLAY POLITICS WITH BILL DEEMED CONSTITUTIONAL BY SUPREME COURT” or…”REPUBLICANS PASS SYMBOLIC VOTE INSTEAD OF DEALING WITH JOBS.”
There will be a great many variations of the headlines but, essentially, they’ll be talking about republicans voting for repeal and getting nowhere doing it.
That, however, should NOT be the headline.
HERE’S what the headline SHOULD be:

185 HOUSE LIBERALS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY – SENATE LIBERALS TO AFFIRM LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY BY NOT VOTING AT ALL!!!

THAT is what REALLY took place yesterday.
Obamacare IS a tax bill…So sayeth the United States Supreme Court. Were it anything BUT a tax bill, it would NOT have been found Constitutional…SO SAYETH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
To ALL conservatives running for seats in the House and to ALL conservatives running for a seat in the Senate…MAKE THE LIBERAL/SOCIALISTS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE OWN YESTERDAY’S VOTE!!!
If you are running for anything from the village DOG CATCHER to the WHITE HOUSE and you are a republican…what took place yesterday IS your platform!!!
At a time when the economy is stagnant, when unemployment hovers at 8.2 percent, when consumer confidence is down, while small business confidence is at its lowest point since Obama became the Emperor, when food stamp use is at its highest point and while our national debt is soaring to never before imagined levels…
185 HOUSE LIBERALS IN THE HOUSE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY AND LIBERALS IN THE SENATE WILL JOIN THEM BY REFUSING TO VOTE ON IT AT ALL.
THAT is a STUNNING reality but it’s not the ONLY reality.
YOU CAN ADD TO THAT THE FACT THAT OBAMA AND THE LIBERAL/SOCIALISTS IN CONGRESS ALSO WANT TO HIKE TAXES ON THOSE MOST LIKELY TO SPUR BUSINESS GROWTH AND PROVIDE HIRING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THOSE 8.2 % OF THE POPULATION “OFFICIALLY” UNEMPLOYED.
Here are some OTHER factual headlines you’ll never see anywhere but in The National Patriot…
“OBAMA WATERS DOWN JOB MARKET FOR AMERICANS BY DUMPING MORE THAN 800,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS INTO THE POOL!!!”
“ OBAMA WANTS TO EXTEND TAX BREAKS FOR 98% OF AMERICANS FOR ONLY 1 MORE YEAR AND THEN…KATY BAR THE DOOR…HE’LL JACK UP THEIR RATES TOO!!!”
“LIBERALS TO HIRE 16,500 NEW IRS AGENTS TO ENFORCE BILL THEY CLAIM IS NOT A TAX!!!”
“3RD CITY IN THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA RUNS OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY, DECLARES BANKRUPTCY!!!”
“OBAMA PANDERS TO BLUE COLLAR WORKERS IN CLEVELAND – HOURS LATER, ATTENDS $40,000 PER PLATE NY FUNDRAISER WITH HOLLYWOOD ELITES!!!”
“DEBBIE WASSERMAN SHULTZ ATTACKS ROMNEY’S SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS WHILE IGNORING HER OWN!!!”
“PARTY WHO VOTED AGAINST EMANCIPATION AND IN FAVOR OF JIM CROW LAWS CALLS PARTY WHO WON ENAMCIPATION AND FOUGHT AGAINST JIM CROW LAWS RACISTS!!!”
“OBAMA COVERS FOR FAST AND FURIOUS GUNS TO MEXICAN DRUG LORDS – NOW WANTS TO CEDE YOUR 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO U.N. AND IRAN!!!”
“ERIC HOLDER SAYS NO TO TEXAS VOTER ID LAW YET INSISTS PRESS SHOW VALID ID TO COVER HIS EVENT IN TEXAS!!!”
“LIBERALS WHO CLAIM SHOWING A VALID ID TO VOTE IS RACIST WILL REQUIRE EVERYONE TO HAVE AN OBAMACARE ID CARD!!!”
“DHS SECRETARY WHO SAYS SOUTHERN BORDER IS SAFER NOW THAN EVER BEFORE WILL NO LONGER SUPPORT ARIZONA LAW ENFORCEMENT OR EXISTING IMMIGRATION LAWS THERE!!!”
“BLACK AG, ERIC HOLDER, CLAIMS VOTER ID LAWS ARE RACIST AND SAYS IN PERSON VOTER FRAUD NONEXISTENT WHILE WHITE CONSERVATIVE REGISTERS TO VOTE AS…AG ERIC HOLDER!!!”
“OBAMA HIRES JOB CREATION ADVISER WHO SENT ENTIRE GE DIVISION TO CHINA THEN CALLS ROMNEY AN OUTSOURCER!!!”
“BIDEN DEMANDS TO SEE ROMNEY’S TAX “PAPERS” BUT FAILS TO DEMAND TO SEE OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE, SOCIAL SECURITY, SELECTIVE SERVICE OR COLLEGE “PAPERS!!!”
“OBAMA SAYS CONSTITUTION AND LAWS ON THE BOOKS PREVENT HIM FROM ENACTING DREAM ACT ON HIS OWN THEN, ENACTS DREAM ACT ON HIS OWN!!!”
These are but a smattering of factual headlines which SHOULD have been seen in print over the last 3 ½ years but have never been written.
We all know that far TOO many people ONLY read headlines and never read the articles. Of those who READ the articles, few bother to investigate them on their own. In today’s 24 hour news cycle and Twitter age, people tend to get their news in 140 characters or less and think they have the full story.
It’s all they need to know or, so they think.
A perfect example of the situation is the FACT that those who relied ONLY on NBC for their news, had NO idea of the Fast and Furious scandal UNTIL…the day Holder was found in contempt because, up to that moment, through more than a year and a half of congressional hearings, subpoenas, investigations and even the death of Agent Brian Terry, NBC had devoted exactly 15 seconds to the story.
So…Today, when you see or hear a headline stating that Obamacare was repealed in the house but it won’t mean a thing because the Senate will not take it up at all…Know the REAL headline…

185 HOUSE LIBERALS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY – SENATE LIBERALS TO AFFIRM LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY BY NOT VOTING AT ALL!!!

Monday, July 9, 2012

IN SEPTEMBER ...SMALL BUSINESSES NEED TO GO ON STRIKE....To flex our muscle with this Administration:

FLEX OUR SMALL BUSINESS MUSCLES!!!
EVERY SMALL BUSINESS SHOULD HOLD A MEETING WITH ITS EMPLOYEES AND EXPLAIN THAT WITH BUSINESS BEING TIGHT AND ALL.... YOU ARE GOING TO LAY OFF ONE EMPLOYEE THIS SEPTEMBER...THANKS TO OBAMA'S ANTI BUSINESS POLICIES:...

Obama Pledge: I Will Raise Taxes on the Rich... WHO ARE THE RICH ?? Businesses earning $ 250,000 a year? (Thats kills jobs you Kenyan Idiot!)

Obama Pledge: I Will Raise Taxes on the Rich

Monday, 09 Jul 2012 12:59 PM
By Newsmax Wires
More ways to share...

President Barack Obama will veto any congressional legislation that extends Bush-era tax cuts to wealthier Americans, the White House made clear on Monday.

"He would not support it. He would not sign that bill," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters when asked whether Obama would veto any bill passed by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives that keeps tax cuts in place across-the-board for all income levels.

Carney spoke after Obama called for a one-year extension of the Bush-era cuts for families earning less than $250,000 a year, seeking to put Republicans on the defensive and reinforce his re-election campaign mantra of being a middle-class champion.

Obama wants to let tax cuts enacted by Republican President George W. Bush, his predecessor, expire on Jan. 1 for higher income earners.

During his speech, Obama — eager to shift election-year attention away from the nation's lackluster jobs market — called on Congress to extend tax cuts for only low and middle income earners while allowing taxes to increase for families that make more than a quarter-million a year.

"Let's not hold the vast majority of Americans and our economy hostage while we debate the merits of another tax cut for the wealthy," said Obama, flanked by a dozen people the White House said would benefit from the middle class-oriented tax cut extension.

Obama wants Congress to pass a one-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts for households making less than $250,000 before they expire at the end of the year. He said the outcome of his November election contest with Republican rival Mitt Romney would then determine the fate of the tax cuts for higher income earners.

"My opponent will fight to keep them in place. I will fight to end them," he said.

Obama has long supported expiration of the tax cuts for those making more than $250,000. But the White House and the president's re-election team are reviving his arguments now as a way to paint congressional Republicans as obstructionists and Romney as a protector of the wealthy, suggesting the GOP push for an across-the-board extension of the tax cuts puts the middle class at risk.

The president's announcement also follows Friday's dismal jobs report, which showed the nation's unemployment rate stubbornly stuck at 8.2 percent.

Romney supports extending the tax cuts for all income earners. His campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul said Monday that Obama's proposal amounted to a "massive tax increase" and proved that the president "doesn't have a clue how to get America working again and help the middle class."

The contours of the tax debate are largely the same as they were when the cuts were due to expire at the end of 2010. While Obama opposed an extension for higher income earners then as well, he ultimately agreed to full two-year extension, in part to win concessions for other legislation.

The president did not say whether he would veto legislation this year that again extended the whole range of tax cuts in full, leaving that to Carney to spell out.

Democrats see the tax debate as part of a larger coordinated attack on Romney, which includes intensifying calls for him to explain offshore bank accounts and release several years of tax returns.

The strategy is aimed at portraying Romney, whose personal wealth could exceed $250 million, as disconnected from middle-class voters.

Romney aides say the Democratic attacks on the presumptive GOP nominee's wealth an "unfounded character assault."

Romney hasn't shirked from his wealth in the face of renewed Democratic criticism. He held a $50,000 per person fundraisers Sunday in the Hamptons, New York's exclusive string of waterfront communities on Long Island's South Shore.

Romney aides also announced that the campaign and the Republican National Committee raised a combined $106 million in June, the former Massachusetts governor's biggest monthly haul so far. The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee raised $71 million last month.

Republican lawmakers immediately balked at Obama's call for a partial extension.

"No one should see an income tax hike next year — not families, not small businesses and other job creators," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

The president's pitch may also face some opposition from congressional Democrats. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Charles Schumer, of New York., a member of the Democrats' Senate leadership, have both advocated denying the tax cut extension to those making above $1 million annually.

Extending the tax cuts only for households making below $250,000 costs the government about $800 billion less over 10 years than extending them for everyone. The full cuts cost the government about $4.5 trillion over a decade.

Obama was to continue the tax debate Tuesday during a campaign trip to Iowa. His re-election team was also promoting the president's tax policy at a series of events this week in battleground states, including New Hampshire, Colorado and Nevada.

The Bush-era tax cuts are due to expire at the end of the year unless Congress votes to extend them. Economists worry that across-the-board tax increases, along with automatic spending cuts also scheduled to take hold at year's end, could be a blow to the shaky U.S. economy.
© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read more on Newsmax.com: Obama Pledge: I Will Raise Taxes on the Rich
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

HEY OBAMA DON'T LIE... YOU KNOW... The Real Unemployment Rate Is Nearly 15%

The Real Unemployment Rate Is Nearly 15%


Would you be shocked to learn that the unemployment rate the mainstream media reports does not actually reflect the true unemployment rate in the U.S.?
The reported unemployment rate is 8.2%.
This is the percentage of people who are out of work but are still pounding the pavement looking for a job in the PAST 4 WEEKS !!.
That is different from the more important number, called the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR). This number represents all of the people in the entire workforce who could look for work if they tried. When people give up looking for work, they exit the workforce.
Have a look at this graph, courtesy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
As you can see, the LFPR climbed from the 1960s on as women entered the workforce. Now, there are various periods of recession. From 1956 to late 1962, the LFPR fell from 60.2% to as low as 58.4%. This included two recessionary periods. The period from 1990-1991 saw the rate drop from 66.8% to 66.0%.

Now here’s the really bad news: The LFPR is now at its lowest level since 1983, at 63.8%, just off its low of 63.6%. It has fallen by 1.9% points (down from 2.1%) — the largest drop under any president and the largest drop in any period since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started keeping track.
Thus, the real unemployment rate isn’t anywhere close to 8.2% because the reported number doesn’t account for all those folks who have given up and left the workforce. The real number?  Are you ready?  It’s 14.8%.

Oh. My. Gosh. Wait — is this right?  Yes. Here’s how the math works:

Let’s say you’re in a town with 100 people. That’s your labor force, and everyone is looking for work. Let’s say 70 of those people are working, and 30 are not. So you have a Labor Force Participation Rate of 100%, employment of 70%, and an unemployment rate of 30%.
Now, 10 people get frustrated and give up looking for work. So you have a Labor Force Participation Rate of 90% since 70 people are working, 20 are not and 10 have given up. That gives you 77% employment and only 23% unemployment!
What about those 10 dejected people who aren’t being counted? 

THEY RE REDUCING THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FOR OBAMA...
YES THAT'S RIGHT STOP LOOKING FOR A JOB AND YOU HELP OBAMA REDUCE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES AND THAT GET HIM RE ELECTED!!

WHAT A PLAN !!

For starters, since real unemployment was a lot worse, it explains some of the spending recovery. Now, however, the easy recovery is over. The question is, where do we go from here?
One problem, as I’ve pointed out, is that there’s a capital strike. I believe this will continue as long as President Obama remains in office. So if you think the election will go his way, then I’d not count on much recovery from here.


THE GOVERNMENT BLUFFS THE REAL U-# UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: Real U-3 Unemployment Rate: 11.6%

Real U-3 Unemployment Rate: 11.6%

Tyler Durden's picture

Propaganda unemployment rate: 8.1%; Real unemployment rate: 11.6%. Reason for difference: organic growth of labor force which grows alongside the broader population. Don't be confused by cheap explanations on TV why the labor force should be declining (especially with ZIRP meaning pre-retirement workers have to stay in the labor force ever longer to supplant their meager fixed income): the widely accepted definition of the labor pool, that used by the CBO and all other government forecasting agencies, assumes a 90,000 growth in the labor force every month as it has to keep in line with the growth of the US population! The implication is simple: using a real labor force participation rate long-term average of 65.8%, the real unemployment rate in April was 11.6%, based on the 5.4 million additional workers that should be counted as part of the U-3 which then means that the real number of unemployed is not 12.5 million but 17.9 million, which in turn implies a 11.6% unemployment rate in the US. This also means that the spread between the propaganda, and the real number is now 3.5%: the most it has been since the early 1980s.

Sick of the BLS propaganda?


Then do the following calculation with us: using BLS data, the US civilian non-institutional population was 242,269 in January, an increase of 1.7 million month over month: apply the long-term average labor force participation rate of 65.8% to this number (because as chart 2 below shows, people are not retiring as the popular propaganda goes: in fact labor participation in those aged 55 and over has been soaring as more and more old people have to work overtime, forget retiring), and you get 159.4 million: that is what the real labor force should be. The BLS reported one? 154.4 million: a tiny 5 million difference. Then add these people who the BLS is purposefully ignoring yet who most certainly are in dire need of labor and/or a job to the 12.758 million reported unemployed by the BLS and you get 17.776 million in real unemployed workers. What does this mean? That using just the BLS denominator in calculating the unemployed rate of 154.4 million, the real unemployment rate actually rose in January to 11.5%. Compare that with the BLS reported decline from 8.5% to 8.3%. It also means that the spread between the reported and implied unemployment rate just soared to a fresh 30 year high of 3.2%. And that is how with a calculator and just one minute of math, one strips away countless hours of BLS propaganda.
Difference between Reported and Implied Unemployment Rate

And why the Labor Force Participation rate is not declining due to retirement.

HEY OBAMA THE MORON.. ...85,000 Americans went on disability benefit in June (while only 80,000 jobs were added in same period)

85,000 Americans went on disability benefit in June (while only 80,000 jobs were added in same period)

WTF ????  And this a great job recovery track ???

Sunday, July 8, 2012

The Wagon-Pullers are Getting Tired ! Are you a Wagon Puller or an Obama Wagon Rider?

ATTENTION...The Wagon-Pullers are Getting Tired ! Are you a Wagon Puller or an Obama Wagon Rider?

Got an over-the-table job? Paying taxes? Paying for your own health insurance? Well, you’re pulling the wagon. If you’ve been pulling it very long, you’ve noticed that it’s getting heavier. That’s because there are more people riding and fewer pulling. How long can this go on? Not forever, that’s for sure and the load is about to get even heavier – much heavier. How long before the wagon runs into the ditch and everybody falls off?

Do you know people who work, but make most of their money under the table? Who don’t pay taxes? Don’t pay medical insurance? If you’re like most of us you don’t just know them, you’re related to them. They’re everywhere. They ride the wagon when they get sick or injured, but they don’t take their turn pulling it. They walk alongside and snicker at the rest of us in the harness.

But you get your medical insurance free because your employer pays it, you say? There’s no such thing as free. For those with, say, an Anthem family policy, it costs more than $50 a day and it’s part of your compensation whether you know it or not. Your employer knows it because he figures it into the cost of employing you. He could give you the $50 and let you send the check to the insurance company, but then the government would take some of it too and you’d pay even more. Nothing is free. Somebody pays. The wagon-pullers pay.

How many people do you know who have gone on disability? How many of them are actually disabled and unable to work? How many have grossly exaggerated their ailments to “qualify” with the help of lawyers from Binder and Binder? I bet you’re related to some of them too. Most of us are.

“The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money,” said former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. The wagon-pullers either quit or collapse in harness and that’s happening already in the UK. It’s nearly bankrupt. With its enormous social programs and surging illegal immigrant population, so is California. The whole USA headed down the same road – and with “bailouts” of a trillion here and a trillion there, we’re picking up speed.

The $825 billion “economic stimulus” package is being shaped by the Democrats in control of Congress and the White House as I write. Obama’s chief economic advisor, Robert Reich, testified before Congress, saying: “I am concerned, as I’m sure many of you are, that these jobs not simply go to high-skilled people who are already professionals, or to white male construction workers.”

Hmm.

Not only will we have increasingly socialist tax policies, money raised will be spent according to race. I thought the Obama Administration was going to be the first “post-racial” presidency. Did I miss something? Reich went on to say: “Criteria can be set so that the money does go to others – the long-term, unemployed minorities, women – people who are not necessarily construction workers or high-skilled professionals.”

Hmm.

Obama says he wants to build roads and bridges and other infrastructure with all that money. He assures us that there are plenty of these projects “shovel-ready” all around the country, just waiting for the funds to go ahead. I can see myself now – being stopped by a chubby wagon-rider with an orange vest, a walkie-talkie, and a STOP sign on a pole in front of a government work crew standing around, leaning on those shovels and smoking cigarettes.

Later, when I drive over one of those “new-infrastructure” bridges, I’ll remember that there weren’t any “highly-skilled, white professionals” involved in building it and I’ll thank God if I make it to the other side.

President Obama told Joe the Plumber he would “spread the wealth around” by raising taxes on the “rich.” Trouble is, the “rich” are paying most of the taxes already and, if you’ve worked all your life and you’re still alive, you’re one of them. As a teacher with a wife and three kids 30 years ago, I was “poor” – officially under the federal poverty line. I’m still a teacher, but with two additional part-time jobs, a working wife and four grown-and-gone children – but now I’m “rich.” Rich and poor are not static categories and my story is not unusual. The top half of American earners pays 96% of federal income taxes. The bottom half pays less than 4%. If you factor in the “earned income tax credit,” most of that bottom half pay less than nothing; they get paid instead. Yet Obama and Pelosi want to give them a rebate! On what? You have to pay first to get money “back.” Let’s just call it what it is – a massive redistribution of income from wagon pullers to wagon riders.
Family Security Matters Contributing Editor Tom McLaughlin Tom is a history teacher and a regular weekly columnist for newspapers in Maine and New Hampshire. He writes about political and social issues, history, family, education and Radical Islam. E-mail him at tommclaughlin@fairpoint.netTwo Pictures that Perfectly Capture the Rise and Fall of the Welfare State
I often warn that the welfare state reaches a point-of-no-return when the number of people riding in the wagon begins to outnumber the number of people pulling the wagon.
To be more specific, if more than 50 percent of the population is dependent on government (employed in the bureaucracy, living off welfare, receiving pensions, etc), it becomes rather difficult to form a coalition to fix the mess. This may explain why Greek politicians have resisted significant reforms, even though the nation faces a fiscal death spiral.
But you don’t need me to explain this relationship. One of our Cato interns, Silvia Morandotti, used her artistic skills to create two images (click pictures for better resolution) that show what a welfare state looks like when it first begins and what it eventually becomes.
These images are remarkably accurate. The welfare state starts with small programs targeted at a handful of genuinely needy people. But as  politicians figure out the electoral benefits of expanding programs and people figure out the that they can let others work on their behalf, the ratio of producers to consumers begins to worsen.
Eventually, even though the moochers and looters should realize that it is not in their interest to over-burden the people pulling the wagon, the entire system breaks down.
Then things get really interesting. Small nations such as Greece can rely on permanent bailouts from bigger countries and the IMF, but sooner or later, as larger nations begin to go bankrupt, that approach won’t be feasible.