Saturday, March 25, 2023

The facts about The Fake Indictment of Donald Trump

 THE SOROS HOUSE NEGRO AND THE SOCIALIST FORCES IN MANHATTAN ARE PART OF THE BIGGER "GET TRUMP"  ARMADA WHO ARE TERRIFIED THAT ANY CANDIDATE THAT THE DEMOCARTS BRING OUT AGAINST TRUMP WILL LOSE IN 2024 EVEN WITH THEIR MASSIVE CHEAT MACHINES AND CROOKED MEDIA. ( NO LONGER JUST FAKE NEWS! )

SO HOUSE NEGRO ALVIN BRAGG IS THE LATEST VOLLEY.


So they are coming out from the shadows with their long knives and crooked schemes and throwing out the rule of Law in concert with the sorry weak pathetic specimen of an Attorney General Merrick Garland ( who was the fuck that left Actually nominated as their Stooge to the Supreme Court just before Hussein left his post as the Illegal President) who nods in agreement and endorses and signs off on every illegal act perpetrated on Donald Trump in the hope that they can stave off the tidal wave of support for America that a huge majority of Patriotic Americans are projecting through Donald Trump who in our opinion is the only man who can actually fight back and WIN.

So their plan this week is to indict  Donald Trump and handcuffed him on Camera to make a cheezy statement.  

We do know that Trump is the subject of a grand jury investigation in Manhattan. That's a city that voted against Donald Trump by almost 80% in the last presidential election. Its the City that regular Folks are fleeing in droves. Its the City where the new Mayor is begging the Tax Payer Class to stay because they need the revenue. 

We also know that the grand jury was impaneled by a Soros funded D.A. called Alvin Bragg.

This Negro comes from the Leftist Class of Victimhood Negroes who believe that getting even with Constitutional America is their Life's Mission and they are recruited by the Soros and Leftist pool who look for these sorry ass creatures that are under many rocks in Democrat controlled areas of America. He looks and acts like a Tawana Brawley-era Al Sharpton. So, we would assume, on the basis of that evidence, that it's pretty likely Trump does get charged with something at some point because his Political MASSA.. George Soros and the Anti Constitutional America Brigades that hide behind the curtain requires that Trump be taken down. They fear Trump because, whatever the Rinos and the Anti Trumpers on all sides might say.. FCAT IS THAT ALTHOUGH TRUMP BE MANY THINGS.. HE IS NOT ANTI AMERICAN AND HE IS NOT A CROOK. So they have to get Trump bay any means possible.

But what do you think this Fat Black House Negro and his ideology Driven team can charge Trump with ?? What law can they pull out of their asses?

That's the question that should matter in a country that has a Constitution and Rules of Law. Laws or universal laws that apply to all citizens equally, precisely because all citizens are considered equal. Thats how Negro Bragg got to wear a suit in the first place. For generations, this was very obvious to American liberals even when they were support Stalin and the Soviet Union and Fidel Castro. 

In fact, it was the basis of their pretend worldview until they had enough power to pull the curtain back and expose themselves for who they are without impunity in Democrat parts of the Country.. Justice must be blind, or else it is tyranny.

So here is what happened. Just the facts!
Eight years ago, as he was running for president, Trump paid a porn actress called Stormy Daniels $130,000. Daniels alleged that she and Trump had at one point had sex. Trump denied that. He still denies it. But in exchange for promising not to repeat that claim in public, Trump, through his then attorney, Michael Cohen, sent Stormy Daniels a check.  

Was that legal? Well here is the legal answer.
Because there was a campaign in progress at the time, officials at the Federal Election Commission later examined the transaction between Trump and Stormy Daniels. Federal investigators concluded that nothing criminal had taken place and in fact, settlements like this, whatever you think of them, are common both among famous people, celebrities and in corporate America. The result is usually known as an NDA, a nondisclosure agreement. 

ideIn this case, you can believe whatever side you want to believe, but paying people not to talk about things, hush money, is ordinary in modern America. According to the FEC, there was no need for Donald Trump to report his payments to Stormy Daniels. Nor was the money that he sent or through his attorney subject to campaign finance limitations. The FEC determined the entire thing was a personal expenditure. 

So, what is the crime here? Well, the Crooked media who are hell bent on staving off Trumps possible win in 2024 are all in to destroy Trump and the MAGA MOVEMENT AT ANY COST. THERY CANNOT ALLOW 2016 TO HAPPEN ALL OVER AGAIN. This is Donald Trump. He's a criminal they lie since they cannot find any other way to stop him. 80 Million Americans do not believe what they are say but the have the Bullhorns and most of the airwaves. So everything he does is a crime. 

So why are they desperately trying to indict and  handcuff Donald Trump? They believe in Optics and the hope that a few Supporters can be peeled off with every lie, every fake accusation of a man they cannot take down as they in the past with all Republican Front Runners. From John McCain to Shitt Romney and  Paul Ryan and so many others. Liberals and Useful Idiot Democrats  don't seem to care at all as long as it happens, as long as Trump gets handcuffed, but in fact, there's plenty of evidence that Trump committed no crime in sending money to Stormy Daniels. We don't have to guess.  

Consider the case of former North Carolina Senator John Edwards. Edwards was often described as a fiery liberal, but in fact, he was a populist. He ran for president twice and in the process infuriated the leaders of the Democratic Party by talking way too much about income inequality. They really hated him for that. Long after Edwards left office, Barack Obama's DOJ charged him with federal finance violations. The premise of the case against John Edwards was that he had received $1,000,000 in gifts and that he spent that money in hush money payments to his mistress, with whom he later had a child. 

Obama's DOJ argues that the money that Edwards sent to his girlfriend amounted to campaign contributions. Edwards never reported that money, so Obama's DOJ tried to send him to prison. Well, in the end, the case fell apart under the weight of its own incoherence. Obama's lawyers argued that any payment that could conceivably help a political candidate politically is by definition a campaign expenditure. There's no law that says that, by the way, they just made it up. But if you think about it for a second, it doesn't make sense. If that were true, flip it around. It would mean that candidates could use donor money and also taxpayer money in the form of federal matching funds to pay for any personal expense, as long as that expense could conceivably benefit them politically. 

placeholderCandidates could take federal matching funds, tax dollars to buy Ferraris as long as they argued those Ferraris would appear in campaign ads, etc., etc. It's nonsensical.  

So, not surprisingly, John Edwards was acquitted in that case. It was a humiliating defeat for the Obama administration, but it also sent a clear message and set a precedent, which Alvin Bragg apparently is being directed to ignore by his whip cracking Massas including George Soros. 

So if Trump is indicted for sending money to Stormy Daniels, well, you'll be watching the abuse of law enforcement power in the name of getting Trump who is face of the MAGA REVOLUTION THAT REFUSES TO GO AWAY. WE WANT TO TAKE AMERICA BACK! 

Remember the "IMPEACH 45" NEGRO HAG WITH A WIG...Maxine Waters who explained, political protests staged on behalf of Donald Trump are not constitutionally protected. They're domestic terrorism. When their Negroes chant about killing Cops and Killing whites in the BLM Movement its OK but WE ARE TERRORISTS!  

HERE'S WHAT MAD MAXINE WATERS SAID: This is Donald Trump sending messages out to domestic terrorists that he's worked with and he helped to organize for the invasion of the Capitol on January 5th. He's sending out a message to them to get ready to protest any arrests, indictments, etc., that he may have. So, he's basically talking to the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, QAnon and the KKK.  

Though January 6, the only really organized group on January 6 was the FBI, of course, but consider the idea and where it's coming from. This is Maxine Waters. This is the lady who cheered on the L.A. race riots three decades ago. This is the very same person just a few years ago said, "If you see anybody from the Trump cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store at a gasoline station. "Get out and create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore anywhere." Basically, necklace them or is it "Garland" them. Oh, yeah Maxine Waters? But she's a Democrat. So, this is just a civil rights exercise. She's protected from domestic terrorism charges and Alvin Bragg is, too. 

placeholderHe's a Democrat and you should know we don't want to impugn his character or anything. We don't want to suggest that there's a connection between politics and the indictment of Donald Trump, but Alvin Bragg did run for office, promising as a campaign promise to indict Donald Trump. We're not guessing. He gave televised interviews about it. Here's what he said 

REPORTER: All right. So, newspaper reports today say we could expect to see an indictment to be handed down against Donald Trump soon. Any thoughts on how you would handle such a high-profile case?  

ALVIN BRAGG: Certainly throughout my career, I've gone wherever the facts have taken me and the types of allegations that have been reported publicly, valuation of assets, perhaps the use of shell companies, tax fraud. I did. I've done all these sort of cases. I've tried a mortgage fraud case. I've tried one of the most significant money laundering cases in the New York region. So, of all the candidates, I sort of stand at the ready with all the tools and a tool kit.  

Yeah, we're going to go after Trump and by the way, he listed some real crimes there, and they have spent years trying to pin those crimes on Trump, even get his tax returns illegally, and they found none of them.

But what's interesting is, even as Bragg has been single-mindedly focused (Bragg is a graduate of Harvard College ) on Donald Trump and his crimes – sending money to a porn star – he has been not only ignoring real crimes, but downgrading felonies to misdemeanors and letting actual violent criminals out of jail as quickly as possible. 

On his first day in office, first day, Bragg consistent with the ideas of the man who paid for his campaign George Soros, issued a memo explaining his office will "not seek a cursory sentence except in cases involving homicides, economic crimes and a small number of felonies." 

In another case, a career criminal who was arrested three times in four months for serious crimes, including assault and aggravated harassment, skipped court and when police finally found him and hauled him to court, Bragg's office let him go in January of last year. Guess what he did when he got out? He murdered a woman.  

Here you have a D.A. who treats violent felonies like they're misdemeanors, even when it gets people killed, who's unleashing criminals on the population, but then spending all of his time trying to destroy his political opponents, in this case, elevating a misdemeanor charge to a felony for the purpose of taking down Trump.

Now, here's what we think, if there is an indictment, will form the core of the charge. Bragg seems to be alleging that Trump violated New York's Business Record Act by falsely reporting the payout to Stormy Daniels as "legal fees." Now, if this were true, it would constitute a misdemeanor, and the statute of limitations has already run out for that for the bookkeeping error, assuming it even happened. But Bragg apparently is thinking about charging Trump under a felony version of the Business Records Law, one that punishes businesses for falsifying records as a way to commit another separate crime. 

MANHATTAN DA BRAGG DECRIES TRUMP'S ATTEMPT TO 'INTIMIDATE' HIS OFFICE IN PRIVATE MEMO 

So, what's behind this? Is he acting alone? We may soon find out. Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio sits in the House Judiciary Committee, is calling on Bragg to testify before the Congress under oath. He wants to hear Bragg explain whether or not he's had any contact with the White House or the Biden DOJ, and if he has, maybe that will explain these charges. He also wants to know whether this prosecution will use any federal funds. Let's hope Alvin Bragg was committed to the rule of law, complies or is forced to comply very soon.

Alvin Bragg chickened out and did not show up! No Surprise. Because Massa Soros could not be there to protect his sorry fat black ass!

But no matter what happens if this indictment arrives, no matter who you voted for, I plan on voting for it. Make no mistake, this is a turning point for the country. WE MUST NOT LET IT HAPPEN. STORM MANHATTAN!  

Now, the headline here is not that they're being unfair to Donald Trump again, though. Of course, they are. Or even that Trump is the former president of the United States. Who cares? I mean, though, as long as we are indicting retired presidents, where are the charges against George W Bush for invading Iraq under false pretenses and giving permanent normal trade relations to China, which completely wrecked our economy? Where are those charges? 

Don't hold your breath. In Washington, wrecking your own country is not considered a crime and of course, George W Bush knows that well, which is why he doesn't seem worried at all. Criticizing the ruling class, that's what they indict you for. But either way, Donald Trump's former job as president of the United States is not really the point here.  

Yes, of course, you can indict former presidents if they've done something wrong. That's not what this is about. The headline here is that there is, as noted, a presidential race in progress right now, and if you check the polls, you will find that Trump is leading the Republican field. That's the unprecedented thing, taking out your opponent, using the justice system. 

If the Democratic Party is allowed to do this, allowed to crush the presidential front-runner, the main threat to their power, with a bogus criminal case, where does that leave us? We're done because that precedent will live forever and voters will never again determine the outcome of a presidential election. It's remarkable when you think about it. A

After all the yelling from permanent Washington about January 6 and how it was a threat to our democratic norms and the peaceful transfer of power, they've decided to completely short circuit our democratic norms, not to mention the peaceful transfer of power using the courts and prosecutors. What happens if they get away with this? No one seems to be thinking this through. Everyone's all spun up, but what happens if they get away with this? 

If they use the Justice Department in full view of everyone to settle a political score and to keep the White House just to take a guy out of the race who seems to be doing fairly well. We’ll destroy the justice system and that's not a small thing. A functioning justice system has kept this country peaceful for hundreds of years. The purpose of a justice system is to administer justice so that citizens don't have to do it themselves. You outsource that duty to the government. But what happens when you take that away, when there is no justice system? 

What happens when the Department of Justice decides that its goal is not justice, but protecting the ruling class at all costs? Think about that. People are still going to demand justice. The desire for justice is an inherent human desire. We are born with it. But if there's no neutral place to do it, some people will decide they're going to have to do it themselves. Now, we don't know exactly what that's going to look like, but we can say for certain it's going to be really ugly. 

So, they hate Donald Trump. Fine, but they don't get to destroy America's justice system because they do. We would never recover from that.  

FIGHT BACK NOW AMERICA.. TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE.


Excerpts from Tucker Carlson show.   

TUCKER CARLSON: The US would never recover from the destruction of the justice system over Trump | Fox News

Thursday, February 2, 2023

You should Know that Nimrata Randhawa AKA "NIKKI HALEY" IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.. YET SHE IS RUNNING SHAMELESLY FOR PRESIDENT

 




Neither of Haley’s parents was a citizen of the United States when she was born,”  “So she can never hold the office of president or the office of vice president in the United States.”
She was born a Sikh and only converted to Methodist after marrying her White Husband and started running for public office. (Convenient since
Haley grew up Sikh, in a place where both the landscape and the culture were dominated by evangelical Christian megachurches.)





Wait … what? Nothing wrong in being a proud daughter of Indian Parents. Nothing wrong at all. BUT SINCE THE INDIAN PARENTS WERE NOT CITIZENS WHEN SHE WAS BORN SHE DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A 'NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" SHE QUALIFIES AS A US CITIZEN BY BIRTH BASED ON THE 14th AMENDMENT. AN ANCHOR BABY. 

Haley’s parents did not apply for U.S. citizenship until the fall of 1977 – almost seven years after she was born – the former ambassador is not a “natural born citizen” per the terms of Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875).

“While we support the endeavors of the Nikki Haley, the facts is that she could never get on the ballot for president or vice president of the United States due to Constitutional disqualification.

Yes Kamala Harris and Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz and Bobby Jindall are all ineligible the same way.

( Some of you will argue so was Obama and you would be wrong. Hussein Obama Senior was NOT the "Real father" of Barrack ! He was a Cuckold set up to mask the true identity of the Communist Father. Stanley Dunham ( Hussein's Mother) was a porn model for a Black Communist living in Hawaii called Frank Marshal Davis who was a very good friend of Valerie Jarret's Father. 

As much as I hate the Islamic PIG HUSSEIN OBAMA... Even though he had a Fake Birth Certificate and was illegally placed in the President's seat against a Fucking asshole called John McCain.. he was secretly a US CITIZEN born in Kenya!!

Some of you will argue so was Obama was not a citizen and you would be wrong. Hussein Obama Senior was NOT the real father of Barrack ! He was a "Cuckold" set up to mask the true identity of the Father Frank Marshal Davis.

Stanley Dunham was a porn model for a Black Communist in Hawaii called Frank Marshal Davis who was a very good friend of Valerie Jarret's Father.

As much as I hated Hussein.. he had a secret "Out" He is as legal as John McCain was. Both were Children born outside the United States to Citizen parents. McCain born in Panama to Citizen parents and Hussein in Kenya. See his Mother was Stanley Dunham and his REAL FATHER was Frank Marshal Davis a US Citizen Communist who lived in Hawaii. Look it up!

Click the links below

The photos were apparently taken at Frank Marshall Davis’s home in Honolulu. The photos reveal an intimate relationship between Obama’s mother and his childhood mentor. 
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2012/06/20/oh-my-ann-dunham-pictures-surface-president-barack-obamas-mom/

Barack Hussien Obama’s real name is in fact Barry Davis.  He was conceived when his atheist White mother was only 17 years old while having an adulterous affair with hatefully-racist, Black Communist activist Frank Marshall Davis of Chicago.

Frank Marshall Davis is Hussein's real father.  In the end in spite of the fake Birth Certificate and Passport and even the fraudulent selective service application that I have written about... Obama was an anti American asshole but a Citizen! )


**********************************************************************

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” the amendment clearly states.  CITIZENS YES NATUTRAL BORN CITIZEN NO! THEY ARE WHAT WE CALL "ANCHOR BABIES"!

Haley was born as Nimrata Randhawa in Bamberg, South Carolina on January 20, 1972. Therefore, she is a citizen of the United States by right of birth – notwithstanding the citizenship status of her parents.



The attempt to allow Naturalized Citizens to run for and hold the position of President or Vice President has been argued and denied many times. 

SEE THIS GUY BELOW? HEARD OF HIM ? HE IS ANWAR AL-AWLAKI.  He was born in the US just like Nikki Haley was. Foreign Parents born in the US. Except he became a Terrorist. According to the logic used by the lefts and stupid Conservatives... he too could run for PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!

Yes people if it were truly permitted then Yemeni Anwar Al-Awlaki who was born in 1971 in New Mexico, where his Yemeni-born father was attending school and was in the US with his Yemeni wife was also eligible like Nikki Haley and Kamala Harris to be President of the USA,  The Mother and Father lived with him in the US until 1978. He left and came Back to the U.S. in 1991 to attend college in Colorado and remained here till he left for Yemen in the 2004. He was a Birthright US CITIZEN. Anyone who argues that Kamala Harris and Nikki Haley and the others I mention can be President should tell me they would be OK with Al Awlaki (who has since been killed by drone strike for being a terrorist) being President too? What's the freaking difference between Kamala Harris, Nikki Haley, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal and others and Terrorist Al Awlaki when it comes to status of immigration?

Read up about him>> 

Anwar al-Awlaki obituary Yemeni-American al-Qaida propagandist and terrorist leader


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

In 2003 Congress tried to amend the Constitutional Law!

H.J.Res.67 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit persons who are not natural-born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 20 years, to be eligible to hold the Office of President.

108th Congress (2003-2004)  

https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-joint-resolution/67/text

It has not passed. So if Congress has not passed the law it cannot the Law! So with Kamala Harris because of the cowardice of the law makers and the Courts of Law they looked the other way and waived that requirement. I believe that if challenged we could win.


READ UNDERSTAND AND SHARE! MORE PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW THIS AND SHARE IT WITH LAW MAKERS


Nikki Haley, Kamala Harris, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindall Ted Cruz are all NOT eligible to serve as President or Vice President. 


Nikki Haley is not a “natural born” citizen. Neither of her parents were American at time of her birth. Those 2 Offices are the only two that the Constitution says MUST be Natural Born Citizens!

There is no argument except the one that is used by defeatist Conservatives.. "well we let Hussein Obama do it"! OK But like I said Obama was most likely the bastard son of Frank Marshal Davis and Stanley Dunham  both US Citizens long before he was born. 


Status as a natural-born citizen of the United States is one of the eligibility requirements established in the United States Constitution for holding the office of president or vice president. This requirement was intended to protect the nation from foreign influence.
.... and please do NOT give me the "Wong Kim Ark" argument. The Supreme Court can rule on one case and make the term "Natural Born Citizen" vague for one case but they cannot Amend the Constitution. Read Article 5 of the Constitution.

Amending the Constitution requires a process. It needs 2/3 of the 50 States to vote in favor of the amendment. ( men in Black robes who are appointed for life do not make laws for the Country Period!)


Here is the Link..  Click on it!

Constitutional Amendment Process

IF YOU BELIEVE THAT WE MUST FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION.. THEN WE CANNOT ALLOW EXCEPTIONS.

Children of foreign nationals inherit the nationality of their foreign national parent(s).
Natural born citizen means born here of citizen parents.
People born with divided loyalties, allegiance and citizenship are not naturally Americans.
The children of foreign nationals are precisely who the founders were excluding from the office.
Only when one cannot be anything else can one be a natural born citizen.

No foreign birth.
No foreign parent(s)
No foreign citizenship(s)
No foreign influence on the Presidency is what John Jay stated in a letter to George Washington as the reason for insisting on a natural born citizen.


  Preamble!The left has gotten the American people to reject one of the most valuable safeguards bequeathed to us by the founders.
The natural born citizen clause served us well until we allowed it to be ignored.



It does not matter if Nikki Haley was born in the US if at the time of her birth her parents were foreign nationals just like Kamala Harris.


Children of foreign nationals inherit the nationality of their foreign national parent(s).
Natural born citizen means born here of citizen parents.
People born with divided loyalties, allegiance and citizenship are not naturally Americans.
The children of foreign nationals are precisely who the founders were excluding from the office.
Only when one cannot be anything else can one be a natural born citizen.

No foreign birth.
No foreign parent(s)
No foreign citizenship(s)
No foreign influence on the Presidency is what John Jay stated in a letter to George Washington as the reason for insisting on a natural born citizen.


Who believes they would have thought the recently deceased King of Thailand was eligible to be President?
He was born in Cambridge MA.

Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009, happened with the complete cooperation of both parties.
They want the Constitution changed without the hassle of amending the Constitution.
Confuse people about the clear meaning of a three word phrase and voila, every anchor baby and Winston Churchill is eligible.

The bench was the reason the GOP went along with the fig leaf resolution for McCain that was used by the Democrats as cover for Obama.
Jindal, Rubio, Haley, George P. Bush and Cruz were all up and comers and the future of the party and ineligible.

See my blog how Nancy Pelosi Forged the Hawaii Document that put Obama on the Ballot

HOW OBAMA & NANCY PELOSI STOLE THE ELECTIONS IN 2008 BY FORGING THE HAWAII CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTS FOR OBAMA. ( FULL DETAILED EXPOSE. PLEASE READ AND SHARE ) ITS NEVER TOO LATE TO EXPOSE THE FACTS.

ELECTIONS?? ITS A SCAM NOW... ITS ALL BEEN RIGGED.
Stalin said it best: "It does not matter who votes in the election.. .. It matters who counts the VOTES!!!"

Click here for that detail https://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-obama-nancy-pelosi-scam-detailed.html

Let me explain as simply as I can!

FIRST YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" AND A "NATURALIZED CITIZEN"
 ( Please link to the blue links for reference articles!)  https://definitions.uslegal.com/n/naturalized-citizen/


Some other politicians including Kamala Harris (D) in the two major political parties who have been mentioned for election to high national political office, Harris and now Nikki Haley are poised to be president by default when "Biden the Demented" keels over!  They are not a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards are:  Marco Rubio (R)Ted Cruz (R)Bobby Jindal (R), and Nikki Haley (R). Both major political parties are choosing to ignore the founders and framers intent and understanding of what a “natural born Citizen” is in order to run candidates that they believe are very marketable political candidates. This started in a major way in the 2008 election cycle with Obama vs McCain.

For more information about the ‘natural born Citizen’ term read this White Paper essay – The Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How the Natural Born Citizen Term was Put Into Our U.S. Constitution as to eligibility for the office of the President of the United States.

Read the following essays regarding the presidential eligibility term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:
1.  Natural born Citizen and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

2.  Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution – The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same | by CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret):  http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-U-S-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same

3.  U.S. Constitution Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html … or …  http://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts


Cannot be President and Commander In Chief

Nikki Haley is NOT a ‘natural born Citizen‘ of USA – NOT Eligible to be President and Commander-in-Chief of Our Military per U.S. Constitution


As per ‘Principles of Natural Law‘ in place at the time of the founding of our country and when the founding documents including the U.S. Constitution were written, a ‘natural born Citizen’ is one born in the country to parents who are both Citizens (born Citizens or naturalized Citizens) of that country when their child is born in the country. See ‘The Three Legged Stool Test‘ for a graphic presentation of this constitutional requirement as to who can be President and Commander in Chief or our military. See the Euler Diagram shown to the right for a logic diagram presentation of this constitutional requirement.


SO YOU SEE?

WANT TO IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION AGAIN ?