AN ALMOST DEAD HILLARY PROPPED UP TO MAKE SURE THE OLIGARCHS WIN THE PRESIDENCY IN 2016!

Hillary's Mysterious Handler Reappears on Her Plane--Then People Flip Out Over What's In His Hand

---

Poor Hillary Clinton. She doesn't seem to be catching a break, what with all the people rumor-mongering about her alleged ill health. 

If it's not former Obama doctors casting doubt on her, it's the American public pointing out her coughing fits, which she has repeatedly chalked up to allergy season. Cough cough.
Four minute coughing bouts at campaign events and fits at so-called "'press conferences" have done nothing to quiet the baseless gossip about her physical fitness, which Hillary supporters are quick to point out are nothing but "conspiracy theories." 

The relentless harassment of Hillary Clinton has extended well beyond coughing and into questions about her being able to make it up stairs...

Supposed trances at campaign rallies...
And seizures in front of reporters. (Well, alleged seizures.)

There has even been hushed word at conservative speakeasies about a purported "handler" who has shown up at Hillary's side, in case the worst case scenario become realized.
Here he is by her side at a campaign rally.

Image credit: Screenshot/ABC News

Stronger together? I think she is.

Image credit: Twitter/@PiratePigeon

There he is.

Again.

Image credit: Twitter/@BobfromThere

Always watching.

Image credit: Twitter/@BobfromThere

Secret Service?

Image Credit: Conservative Treehouse

Don't make us laugh.

Image credit: Conservative Treehouse

Was he in the car with Bill Clinton when Hillary got out of the hospital in 2013?

Image Credit: 70News

Check your speed, bro.
Where was he when she was going up those stairs?

Image credit: Mark Makela/Getty Images

Oh, yeah.

Image Credit: Mark Makela/Getty Images

He's with her.
Chill, Hill.

Image Credit: Conservative Treehouse

You've got this.
So, who is this guy? A neurologist dressed up to look like a Secret Service agent?

Reddit says, "keep looking." That's not our guy.
But the dude is always prepared.

Image Credit: Gateway Pundit

What is that in his hand?

Image Credit: Gateway Pundit

Let's take a closer look.

Image Credit: Gateway Pundit

Zoom in and brighten.

Image Credit: Gateway Pundit

Mike Cernovich thinks he knows.

Image Credit: Gateway Pundit

Diazepam? Isn't that for seizures?
Might it be... a flashlight?

Image Credit: Metabunk.org

Blogger Mick West argues it is.

Image Credit: Metabunk.org

Let's see if he's using it here while on duty:

That's certainly weird use of a diazepam pen. Maybe we just need to take a "chill pill."
So where is our mystery man nowadays? Aboard Hillary's new plane?

Image Credit: Fox 10/Screenshot

Gotcha.

Image Credit: Fox 10/Screenshot

So, is this mysterious man a handler, a medical professional disguised as a Secret Service agent, an actual Secret Service agent, or her "brainwasher"?

FACT IS HILLARY IS ONE SICK HUMAN .. BEING PROPPED UP TO ATTEMPT TO TAKE THE PRESIDENCY SO THAT THE CABAL CAN RUN IT.. WITHOUT ANY INTERFERENCE.

THE OBAMA CLINTON DEN OF THIEVES!

JUST AS STUNNING AS THE UNENDING STREAM OF REPORTS OF SCANDAL AND SUBTERFUGE THAT HAS COME TO DEFINE HILLARY CLINTON’S TENURE AS SECRETARY OF STATE.... IS THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S TIRELESS EFFORT TO KEEP A LID ON IT BECAUSE IF THEY DON'T THE TRUTH ABOUT ITS OWN INVOLVEMENT IN THE THUGGERY AND MONEY STEALING WILL BE EXPOSED.

Look....Obama knows that if Crooked Hillary doesn’t win, virtually all of his “accomplishments” will be wiped away by Trump like a street sweeper washes away dog shit on a hot summer Kenyan sidewalk.

So he is using every aspect of his Executive office to shield Hillary from prosecution, from reporters, her failing health, and from scrutiny of any kind. Will it be enough to give her the Oval Office in November. Anyone who does not see it needs to be euthanized and his brain used for testing on how idiots are created.


Whether it’s the Justice Department taking a pass when afforded the opportunity to investigate or the State Department steadfastly defending every controversy, President Obama’s administration has emerged as a first line of defense for the woman who would carry on his legacy.

The kid-glove treatment of Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, has helped shield her from bad headlines . The left wing media do their part like desperate mongrels shielding a bitch in heat.

THE ADMINISTRATION’S PROTECTIVENESS TOWARD MRS. CLINTON HAS OUTRAGED REPUBLICANS AND RAISED EYEBROWS AMONG ETHICISTS.

Aine Donovan, director of the Ethics Institute at Dartmouth College, said the Obama administration definitely has a problem that it has failed to pursue questions of misconduct by Mrs. Clinton.
“We don’t want people let off the hook just because they have a public name. I think it is very important that we follow up,” said Ms. Donovan.

SHE STRESSED THAT QUESTIONS OF ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, SUCH AS THOSE DOGGING MRS. CLINTON BECAUSE OF FOREIGN DONATIONS TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION WHILE SHE WAS SECRETARY OF STATE, INVOLVED “GRAY AREAS” BETWEEN PROPER AND IMPROPER BEHAVIOR. THESE TYPES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE COMMONPLACE IN VARIOUS PROFESSIONAL SETTINGS, SHE SAID, BUT HOW THE CONFLICT IS MANAGED OFTEN BECOMES MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE CONFLICT ITSELF.

“The higher up you go in public perception, the more important it is to make sure that there is transparency, that even a perception [of impropriety] is immediately eradicated,” she said. “This becomes a problem for Hillary Clinton. She’s battling issues of trustworthiness as it is without this latest issue and that just kind of compounds matters.”

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS  TAKEN MRS. CLINTON’S SIDE EVERY TIME ETHICAL QUESTIONS ARISE. YOU KNOW WHY RIGHT ? THE FLEAS ARE ON OBAMA'S PUBES AS WELL.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch last month closed the case on Mrs. Clinton’s secret email setup as secretary of state, declining to press charges despite the mishandling of classified information by the former first lady and U.S. senator.

The Justice Department also put the kibosh on requests from three FBI field offices for a public corruption probe into the Clinton Foundation and the State Department under Mrs. Clinton, according to multiple reports last week.

The FBI field offices made the request this year after being alerted by banks to suspicious transactions involving the Clinton Foundation, which has been the focus of accusations of cronyism and pay-to-play dealmaking when Mrs. Clinton ran the State Department from 2009 to 2012.
The Obama administration also has gone to bat for Mrs. Clinton in court, trying to block her from having to testify under oath about her secret email server. In documents filed last month, the State and Justice departments said the former secretary has already said enough publicly about why she chose to use the secret server and why she failed to properly store her emails.

Mrs. Clinton has said she thought she had permission to use her secret account, though nobody at the State Department has acknowledged giving her approval — a discrepancy that Judicial Watch, which sued to get a look at the emails, says must be settled by Mrs. Clinton in sworn testimony. The Obama administration, though, said that’s not enough of a reason to force the former secretary to go under oath.

All sides are still awaiting a judge’s ruling in that case.

WORKING TOGETHER

State Department emails obtained by Judicial Watch and released last week further exposed the interplay between the agency and the Clintons’ family foundation:

? Mrs. Clinton’s State Department chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, performed work simultaneously for the agency and the Clinton Foundation. Ms. Mills’ attorney and the Clinton campaign insisted her work for the foundation was strictly voluntary, but questions about the arrangement persist.

? Clinton Foundation official Doug Band communicated with Ms. Mills and top Clinton aide Huma Abedin in April 2009 about arranging for Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire Gilbert Chagoury, who is a major donor to the foundation, to talk to the agency’s “substance person” on Lebanon.

? Mr. Band emailed Ms. Mills and Ms. Abedin about finding a State Department job for someone whose name was redacted from the email but whom Mr. Band described as someone “important to take care of.”

Repeatedly confronted by the press about these incidents, State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau dismissed questions on virtually everything that transpired under Mrs. Clinton’s leadership.

“The department’s actions under Secretary Clinton were taken to advance administration policy as set by the president and in the interests of American foreign policy,” she said. “The State Department is not aware of any actions that were influenced bythe Clinton Foundation.”

Leon E. Panetta, who served as head of the CIA and the Pentagon in Mr. Obama’s first term, also came to the defense of Mrs. Clinton on Sunday when questioned about the ties between her aides and the Clinton Foundation.

“Staff people trying to make connections in Washington is a pretty prevalent behavior by most people in Washington …,” Mr. Panetta told ABC’s “This Week.” “I really do think it’s time for the candidates and for the American people to move on and talk about the real issues.”

Most strikingly, the administration raced to Mrs. Clinton’s rescue despite the intense scrutiny of the relationship between Mr. Obama and the woman he appointed as secretary of state and now endorsed for president.

“Certainly there are some questions about independence when the same administration that appointed Mrs. Clinton is also investigating her,” said Scott H. Amey, general counsel for the nonpartisan Project on Government Oversight. “My hope is that there is enough integrity in the system to fight off any politicking and damage control, but that might be a heavy lift for some in federal government circles. Only time will tell.”

SHE SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED BASED ON THE FACT THAT SHE OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE. SHE FLAUNTED THE PRESERVATION ORDER OF DOCUMENTS.. BECAUSE SHE KNEW THAT SHE COULD MOST PROBABLY SURVIVE THE OBFUSCATION AND COVER UP WITH THE HELP OF HUSSEIN OBAMA ... GIVING UP THE DOCUMENTS WOULD HAVE EXPOSED THE TOTAL CORRUPTION OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.

IF HILLARY CLINTON CANNOT REMEMBER HER TIME AS SECRETARY OF STATE..SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT. PERIOD!

The 40 Things Clinton "Could Not Recall" During Her FBI Interview. She is Lying to stay out of jail or too incompetent top be President. 

NOW AT THE DEBATE IF SHE REMEMBERS ANYTHING IT COULD BE A FABRICATION.. OR SHE LIED THAT SHE CANNOT REMEMBER.

UPDATE JUDICIAL WATCH GAVE HER 25 QUESTIONS TO ANSWER UNDER OATH:

Hillary Answers Judicial Watch Under Oath - "Does Not Recall" Most Of Her Tenure As Secretary Of State. AND SHE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT? HOW CAN SHE USE ALL HER EXPERIENCE SHE CLAIMS IF SHE CANNOT REMEMBER ANY OF HER PAST? ( SHE IS A LIAR! )

Back in August, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch the right to ask 25 questions of Hillary Clinton about the creation of her private email server which she was required to answer under oath (we wrote about it here).  This morning Hillary filed her response to those 25 questions which can be best summarized by the following stats:

Occurrences of the phrase "Does Not Recall":  20
Occurrences of the word "Object" or "Objection":  84

To summarize the 23-page response, Hillary "does not recall" the majority of her tenure as Secretary of State and "objects" to everything that she does recall.
Another phrase that occurs throughout the document, well at least in response to the questions that she actually decided to answer, implies that she was under the illusion that all of her emails subject to FOIA requests would be captured on the email systems of her staffers who actually decided to follow the law and use "state.gov accounts."

"...her practice was to e-mail State Department staff on their state.gov accounts, her e-mail was being captured in the State Department’s recordkeeping systems."

Isn't it ironic that Hillary recognizes the legal basis for using "state.gov" accounts but then says that she "does not recall whether she had a specific expectation that the State Department would receive FOIA requests for or concerning her e-mail."  Of course, FOIA requests are such uncommon things...why should she expect to receive one?  The blatant disregard for maintaining federal records, in and of itself, is just astonishing. 
Moreover, what about emails that Hillary sent to people outside of the State Department?  Did she not send any "work-related" emails to people outside the government?
In response to a question on whether Hillary's 30,000 "personal emails" were retained, Hillary said she did not think they were kept but denied "any personal knowledge about the details" of their deletion.

"She believes that her personal e-mails were not kept, and she does not have any personal knowledge about the details of that process."

So we're supposed to honestly believe that some rogue staffer or techie unilaterally decided to delete 30,000 emails belonging to the former Secretary of State of the United States of America without first asking her permission to do so?  Really?

While the whole document is a total farce, here is a list of a couple of the questions to which Hillary actually replied:

Question:  After President Obama nominated you to be Secretary of State and during your tenure as secretary, did you expect the State Department to receive FOIA requests for or concerning your email?

Response:  Secretary Clinton does not recall whether she had a specific expectation that the State Department would receive FOIA requests for or concerning her e-mail.  She understood that, because her practice was to e-mail State Department staff on their state.gov accounts, her e-mail was being captured in the State Department’s recordkeeping systems.

Question:  During your tenure as Secretary of State, did you understand that email you sent or received in the course of conducting official State Department business was subject to FOIA?

Response:  Secretary Clinton understood that e-mail she sent or received in the course of conducting official State Department business was subject to FOIA.  She further understood that, because her practice was to e-mail State Department staff on their state.gov accounts, her e-mail was being captured in the State Department’s recordkeeping systems.

Question:  During your tenure as Secretary of State, what, if any, effort did you make to inform the State Department’s records management personnel (e.g., Clarence Finney or the Executive Secretariat’s Office of Correspondence and Records) about your use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business?

Response:  Secretary Clinton does not recall specifically informing the State Department’s records management personnel about her use of her clintonemail.com e-mail account to conduct official State Department business; she did openly communicate via her clintonemail.com account with many people in the State Department.  Secretary Clinton does not recall interacting with Clarence Finney or employees of the Executive Secretariat’s Office of Correspondence and Records.  

Question:  In a November 13, 2010 email exchange with Huma Abedin about problems with your clintonemail.com email account, you wrote to Ms. Abedin, in response to her suggestion that you use a State Department email account or release your email address to the Department, “Let’s get a separate address or device.”  Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business after agreeing on November 13, 2010 to “get a separate address or device?”  Include in your answer whether by “address” you meant an official State Department email account (i.e., a “state.gov” account) and by “device” you meant a State Department-issued BlackBerry.  A copy of the November 13, 2010 email exchange with Ms. Abedin is attached as Exhibit B for your review.

Response:  Secretary Clinton recalls that her November 13, 2010 e-mail exchange with Huma Abedin attached as Exhibit B to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories was triggered by a problem with the State Department’s telephone system.  When Secretary Clinton wrote, “This is not a good system,” she was referring to the way in which the State Department would notify her of telephone calls.  Secretary Clinton does not recall what precisely she meant by the words “address” or “device.”  To the best of her recollection, she meant that she was willing to use a State Department e-mail account or device if it would resolve the problems with receiving telephone calls, so long as her personal e-mails with family and friends would not be accessible to the State Department.  Following this e-mail exchange, the State Department changed the way in which it notified Secretary Clinton of telephone calls, resolving the problem that triggered this e-mail.  

Question:  After you left office, did you believe you could alter, destroy, disclose, or use email you sent or received concerning official State Department business as you saw fit?  If not, why not?

Response:  Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 21 as outside the scope of permitted discovery in this case for the reason set forth in General Objection No. 3.  Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 21 on the ground that it requests information that is outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reason set forth in General Objection No. 5. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall considering after she left office whether she could alter, destroy, disclose, or use e-mails concerning official State Department business.  Secretary Clinton further refers Plaintiff to her Response to Interrogatory No. 22.

Question:  In late 2014, the State Department asked that you make available to the Department copies of any federal records of which you were aware, “such as an email sent or received on a personal email account while serving as Secretary of State.”  After you left office but before your attorneys reviewed the email in your clintonemail.com email account in response to the State Department’s request, did you alter, destroy, disclose, or use any of the email in the account or authorize or instruct that any email in the account be altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used?  If so, describe any email that was altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used, when the alteration, destruction, disclosure, or use took place, and the circumstances under which the email was altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used?  A copy of a November 12, 2014 letter from Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy regarding the State Department’s request is attached as Exhibit F for your review.

Response:  Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 22 as outside the scope of permitted discovery in this case for the reason set forth in General Objection No. 3.  Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 22 on the ground that it requests information that is outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reason set forth in General Objection No. 5.  Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 22 insofar as it requests information about all e-mail in her clintonemail.com account, including personal e-mail.  Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall altering, destroying, disclosing, or using any e-mails related to official State Department business from her tenure as Secretary of State in her clintonemail.com account or instructing anyone else to do so after she left office and before her attorneys reviewed the e-mails in her clintonemail.com e-mail account in response to the State Department’s request.

Question:  After your lawyers completed their review of the emails in your clintonemail.com email account in late 2014, were the electronic versions of your emails preserved, deleted, or destroyed?  If they were deleted or destroyed, what tool or software was used to delete or destroy them, who deleted or destroyed them, and was the deletion or destruction done at your direction?

Response:  Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 23 as outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reason set forth in General Objection No. 3.  Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 23 on the ground that it requests information that is outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reason set forth in General Objection No. 5.  Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 23 insofar as it requests information about all e-mail in her clintonemail.com account, including personal e-mail.  Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Secretary Clinton states that it was her expectation that all of her work-related and potentially work-related e-mail then in her custody would be provided to the State Department in response to its request.  Secretary Clinton believes that her attorneys retained copies of the e-mails provided to the State Department in December 2014, but she does not have any personal knowledge about the details of that process.  Secretary Clinton decided that, once her work-related and potentially work-related e-mails were provided to the State Department, she had no reason to keep her personal e-mails, which did not relate to official State Department business.  She believes that her personal e-mails were not kept, and she does not have any personal knowledge about the details of that process. 

The complete court document can be viewed here:

TAKE YOUR PICK! BOTH WAYS SHE IS DISQUALIFIED AND SHAME ON THE MEDIA FOR ALLOWING THIS TO CONTINUE!

 

BACK TO THE OLDER STORY ABOUT THE FBI....

The FBI just threw Clinton cautiously under the bus with the following statement which links Hillary's "inability" to "recall" her transition instructions with her 2012 concussion and blood clot (see "Smoking Gun? FBI Reveals Hillary Could Not Recall Briefings Due To Concussion, Clot"):



But it turns out Hillary "could not recall" a lot of things about her tenure as Secretary of State.  In fact, during her 3.5 hour interview with the FBI, Hillary couldn't recall at least 40 questions posed by the FBI, at least some of which were fairly material events during her service which probably should have stood out.  Below is a list of just a couple of the things Hillary "could not recall."

HOW THE HELL CAN A WOMAN WHO CAN'T REMEMBER EVENTS BE QUALIFIED TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF?
Below is the exchange with FBI investigators where Clinton apparently doesn't "recall" ever receiving any training from the State Department related to retention of federal records or handling of classified information...she doesn't even recall when she received her security clearance.



Well, per the Nondisclosure Agreement below, signed by Hillary, we would guess she received her "briefing or training by State" on or around January 22, 2009.  So that leads us to derive only 3 logical conclusions, either (1) Hillary committed perjury by signing the NDA below without receiving the training indicated, (2) Hillary lied to the FBI during her interview or (3) Hillary simply has no long-term recollection of many of the key moments of her term as Secretary of State which brings into question her mental competency.




Of course, training wasn't even that relevant because Clinton doesn't "recall" ever even receiving a single "classified" email on her private server.  And even if she did, it would be the fault of her staffers as she "relied on State officials to use their judgement when emailing her" on her "unclassified system."  Which begs the question, how else were people supposed to get her information since the only email she had was hosted on her "unclassified" private server?  We're sure Clinton does not recall. 


And here is Clinton not recalling the process for "nominating a target for a drone strike."  Why would that be important...that was more Obama's thing.


In total, Hillary "could not recall" the following 40 past events in her short interview the FBI. 

Here’s All 40 Times Hillary Clinton Told the FBI She Couldn’t Remember Something

 

All of the below quotes are taken verbatim from the FBI notes of their interview of Hillary Clinton released this Friday:
1.

“Clinton could not recall when she first received her security clearance and if she carried it with her to State via reciprocity from her time in the Senate.”

2.

“Clinton could not recall any briefing or training by State related to the retention of federal records or handling of classified information.”

3.

“Clinton was aware she was an Original Classification Authority (OCA) at State. Clinton could not recall how often she used this authority or any training or guidance provided by State.”

4.

“Clinton recalled being briefed on special access program (SAP) information but could not recall any specific briefing on how to handle information associated with SAP’s.”

5.

“Clinton was certain she signed an agreement memorializing her access to SAP material, but she could not recall specific detail.”

6.

“Clinton could not recall a specific process for nominating a target for a drone strike and recalled much debate pertaining to the concurrence process.”

7.

“When Clinton’s BlackBerry malfunctioned, her aides would assist in obtaining a new BlackBerry. After moving to the new device, her old SIM card was disposed of by her aides. Clinton did not recall how any data stored on the device was destroyed.”

8.

“While on international travel, Clinton never suspected her BlackBerry was tampered with, nor did she ever lose a BlackBerry while traveling. There were a few occasions where Clinton staff was provided with the secure cell phone, the Clinton did not recall the circumstances or frequency with which this event occurred.”

9.

“Clinton requested a secure BlackBerry while at State, but could not recall why they were unable to provide one.”

10.

“Clinton did not recall receiving any emails she thought should not be on an unclassified system.”

11.

“Clinton did not recall her specific conversations regarding the creation of the clintonemail.com domain, but around January 2009, directed aides to create the email account.”

12.

“Clinton did not recall receiving guidance from State regarding email policies outlined in the Foreign Affairs Manual.”

13.

“Some aides had access to Clinton’s BlackBerry and email accounts, but she could not recall specifically who had access.”

14, 15.

“Additionally Clinton did not recall any specific routine for deleting emails from her account while Secretary of State, nor did she recall ever receiving any messages indicating her account was reaching a storage limit.

16.

“Huma Abedin also had an account on clintonemail.com because she frequently assisted client in with personal matters. Clinton did not recall any other individuals being offered an account on clintonemail.com.”

17.

“After reviewing an email dated June 4, 2011 with the subject line ‘RE: Google email hacking and woeful state of civilian technology,’ Clinton stated she did not recall the compromise of State employees’ Gmail accounts.”

18, 19.

“After reviewing a State communication dated June 28, 2011 with the subject line ‘Securing Personal Email Accounts,’ Clinton stated all cables of a certain policy nature went out under her name and she did not recall the specific cable. Additionally, Clinton did not recall this cable correlating with Brian Pagliano upgrading the clintonemail.com server.”

20.

“When Clinton had technical issues with her server, she contacted [Justin Cooper]. She could not recall ever contacting Pagliano for technical support.”

21.

“She did not recall using an iPad mini until after her tenure as Secretary of State and has never used a MacBook or other computer to access her email.”

22.

“After reviewing an email dated October 13, 2012 with the subject line ‘This am Green on Blue,’ Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

23.

“After reviewing an email dated [REDACTED] with subject line [REDACTED], Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

[Editor’s note: that exact phrase appears several time on this list. Each time is a separate instance.]
24.

“After reviewing an email dated [REDACTED] with subject line [REDACTED], Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

25.

“Clinton did not recall [Jacob Sullivan] using his Google email account for official business and could not say why it was used in this instance.”

26.

“After reviewing an email dated [REDACTED] with subject line [REDACTED], Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

27.

“Clinton did not recall a State policy on confirming classified information and media reports.”

28.

“After reviewing an email dated August 25, 2010, with subject line ‘FW: New York Times article on Salehi,’ Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

29.

“After reviewing email dated [REDACTED] with subject line [REDACTED], Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

30.

“After reviewing an email dated December 27, 2011, with the subject line ‘FW: SBU,’ Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

31.

“After receiving an email dated [REDACTED] with subject line [REDACTED] Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

32.

“After reviewing an email dated June 17, 2011, subject line [REDACTED], Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

33.

“Clinton had no recollection of actually receiving a ‘non-paper’ or a secure fax and this instance.”

34.

“[REDACTED] talking points are typically classified, but Clinton did not recall in this instance.”

35.

“After reviewing an email dated April 9, 2012, with subject line ‘Call to President Banda,’ Clinton stated she did not remember the email specifically.”

36.

“In December of 2012, Clinton suffered a concussion and then around the New Year had a blood clot. Based on her doctor’s advice, she could only work at State for a few hours a day and could not recall every briefing she received.”

37.

“After reviewing an email dated December 11, 2012 with the subject line ‘FW: Significant FOIA Request,’ Clinton stated she did not recall the specific request and was not aware of receiving any FOIA requests for information related to her email during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

38.

“Clinton did not recall being read-out of her clearance or any SAP’s by State personnel.”

39.

“Clinton’s email address was publicly disclosed in March 2013 when Sydney Blumenthal‘s email account was compromised. As a result Clinton was advised to change her email address and did so, but she did not recall specifically who made this recommendation.”

40.

“Clinton believed [REDACTED] was her primary BlackBerry phone number and she did not recall using a flip phone during her tenure at State, only during her service in the Senate.”

Unfortunately for him, it seems to be that the "Undisclosed PRN Staff Member,"  "The "Oh Shit" Moment: Hillary Wiped Her Server With BleachBit Despite Subpoena") who had the infamous "oh shit moment" and admitted to deleting Hillary's emails even though he was aware of a federal subpoena, is the only person around Hillary who isn't suffering from a severe case of amnesia.  Poor guy, sanity is a curse.