IT IS ILLEGAL TO FORCE ANYONE TO TAKE THE COVID JAB THROUGH COERCION OF ANY KIND
NUREMBERG CODE
Article 6, section 3:
ARREST THE ENFORCERS!
BE AWARE THAT ANY AUTHORITY AT THE STATE, LOCAL OR FEDERAL LEVEL THAT USES COERCION OF ANY KIND BE IT PHYSICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL OR UNDER THREAT OF LOSS OF LIVELIHOOD OR TRANSPORTATION OR HOUSING IS IN VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE AND THE US CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND THE 1964 HELSINKI DECLARATION.
IT TAKES A GROUP OF CITIZENS PREPARED TO RESIST AND TO PERFORM "CITIZENS ARREST" ENSHRINED IN OUR CONSTITUTION AND ARREST THE COMMANDING AUTHORITIES LIKE FAUCI AND BIDEN AND CORPORATE HOSPITALS AND STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEADS AND OTHERS AND HOLD THEM AND RESIST THE FEDERAL THUGS WHO WILL TRY TO RESCUE THESE WAR CRIMINALS.
The more this is in the news the more Good Americans will join the movement and we can overthrow this criminal cadre of Anti America Forces trying to steal our Freedoms and install a Socialist Oligarchy in our Great Land!
NO MORE!
START A LOCAL "ANTI VACCINE" CELL TO ORCHESTRATE ARRESTS IN YOUR CITY.
We can create 1000 cells across America!
DON'T WAIT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO START IT.
Federal Law Prohibits Mandates of Emergency Use COVID Vaccines, Tests, Masks — 3 Resources You Can Use to Inform Your School or Employer!
Under federal law, employers and universities cannot legally mandate COVID vaccines because they are unlicensed Emergency Use Authorization products which are, by definition, experimental.
The bottom line is this: mandating products authorized for Emergency Use Authorization status (EUA) violates federal law as detailed in the following legal notifications.
All COVID vaccines, COVID PCR and antigen tests, and masks are merely EUA-authorized, not approved or licensed, by the federal government. Long-term safety and efficacy have not been proven.
EUA products are by definition experimental, which requires people be given the right to refuse them. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.”
Earlier this year, Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel, and attorney Greg Glaser stated that federal law prohibits employers from mandating EUA COVID vaccines (or EUA COVID-19 tests or masks).
Holland and Glaser wrote:
“If a vaccine has been issued EUA by the FDA, it is not fully licensed and must be voluntary. A private party, such as an employer, school or hospital cannot circumvent the EUA law, which prohibits mandates. Indeed, the EUA law preventing mandates is so explicit that there is only one precedent case regarding an attempt to mandate an EUA vaccine.”
What to do if your school or employer says you must get the COVID vaccine
The Children’s Health Defense legal team has written three legal notifications that anyone faced with a COVID vaccine, COVID test or mask mandate can use to inform employers and universities that they are violating federal law. You can download the three notifications here.
All of the notifications include this language:
“Federal law, Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, states the following about products granted emergency authorization usage:
Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
Any entity or organization that requires EUA COVID-19 vaccinations, COVID-19 tests or masks are in violation of federal law, and will likely face lawsuits if they don’t allow exemptions or alternatives.”
Submitting the notices prepared by Children’s Health Defense is the first step prior to seeking an exemption or taking legal action.
Vaccine exemption laws vary by state. Go to the National Vaccine Information Center to learn more about your state exemptions.
It’s critical to stand against mandates and preserve legally protected, fundamental human rights on issues related to health freedom. Don’t fall prey to coercion and pressure, use the resources available to protect your legal rights.
Nuremberg Code of 1947 – refuse the vaccine
The right to avoid the imposition of human experimentation is fundamentally rooted in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. has been ratified by the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and further codified in the US. Code of Federal Regulations. In addition to the US regarding itself as bound by these provisions, these principles were adopted by the FDA in its regulations requiring the informed consent of human subjects for medical research. It is unlawful to conduct medical research even in the case of an emergency unless steps are taken to secure. informed consent of all participants.
Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent. Clearly, mandatory Covid-19 vaccinations fail this test on multiple fronts.
In Doe #1 versus Rumsfeld 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (2003) a federal court held that the United States military could not mandate Emergency Use vaccines for soldiers :”The United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs”
10 Core Declarations of the Nuremberg Code
The Nuremberg Code Makes 10 Declarations
There are ten points to the code, which was published in the section of the verdict entitled “Permissible medical experiments”:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is a must. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should
be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the
physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to
him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge
must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has
probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior
skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the
experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the
experimental subject.
No ‘Novel’ Covid Vaccine has been proven to be Independently Studied and identified as 1. Safe and 2. Effective (long term and with people already on Poly Pharmacy/Infirm/OAP’s or with comorbidities) and 3. You cannot even sue the manufacturer assuming you or family member was injured due to the ‘effects’ of the chemicals injected into your body. 4. in fact 20-30% of all healthcare workers won’t take it.
Connecticut Public Health Committee : please vote no on Bill 7199 : read the speech that one brave American woman gave to the state’s public health committee. Item 1 of the Nuremberg Code protects our right to informed consent. All vaccine mandates are in violation of this code. Study finds COVID variant affects vaccinated individuals more than unvaccinated. Vaccinated people spread the virus just as fast as the unvaccinated. Ivermectin = Powerful Antiviral Treatment this alone should have prevented the FDA from granting either EUA or full approval to either of the mRNA Covid vaccines.
Since Covid hit big changes have been made to the very definition of the word vaccine !
In 2019, Meriam-Webster’s definition of a vaccine was “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.”. Just after the pandemic hit, in early 2021, they had changed the definition to “A preparation that is administered as by injection to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious disease”:
- A: an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)
- B: a preparation of genetic material (such a a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)” spike proteins never fit the standard definition !
If vaccination is a public health measure meant to protect and benefit the collective, then it must: render immunity to the inoculated individual and Inhibit transmission of the disease from the vaccinated person.
But the mRNA vaccines do not do these things. As such, they cannot even qualify for use as a public health measure capable of providing collective benefit that supersedes individual risk.
However the opposite is true ! The only one benefiting from the vaccine is that person alone, since all they are designed to do is lessen clinical symptoms associated with one spike protein (new variants have NEW spike proteins); to accept the risks “for the greater good” of the community is nonsense.
Marketing mRNA Therapy as Vaccine Violates Federal Law
Since
mRNA vaccines do not meet the standard medical and/or legal definition
of a vaccine, referring to them as vaccines, and marketing them as such,
is a deceptive practice that violates 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act,10 the law that governs advertising of
medical practice.
ARE YOU MAD ENOUGH TO FIGHT BACK ? ARE YOU BRAVE ENOUGH TO SAY NO ! THIS IS A POLITICAL WEAPON UNLEASHED ON US DISGUISED AS A HEALTH CRISIS. THE SOONER YOU REALIZE THIS AND WORK TO ARRESTS THE CRIMINALS...THE SAFER YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN WILL BE INTO THE FUTURE!
IF NOT WE ARE DOOMED. PREPARE FOR A FASCIST SOCIETY WHER YOU WILL HAVE NO FREEDOMS YOU CHERISH.
