EXPOSED. Comey And Mueller Had Private Conversations on Tactics Days After He Was Fired

EXPOSED!

 

Comey And Mueller Had Private Conversations Days After He Was Fired

Now will Jeff Sessions look into this Collusion? Demand that Jeff Sessions fire Mueller! There is a Huge Conflict of Interest for Mueller.

The corruption allegations of the special counsel’s ‘legal team’ received more evidence as conversations were reported during the eight day gap between the firing and the appointment.

Jeff Sessions knows that this has nothing to do with the Russia Collusion that he recused himself from. This is plain BLACK LETTER LAW!. If Sessions does not fire Mueller he is either a POLITICAL EUNUCH or a Deep State State Trojan Horse. Time to call him out!

Comey’s own personal security detail ratted him out with hard evidence proving the corruption allegations that have been floating around for months.

Over the weekend, Trump-supporting top officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation spouted a fountain of leaks sure to rival the earthshaking power of Yellowstone’s Steamboat Geyser. The whole Russia “collusion” collaboration seems to have been blown wide open. James Comey was on the phone with his old pal Robert Mueller hours after being fired by President Trump. The former Director of the FBI then privately colluded and conspired with Mueller for an entire week before Mueller was appointed Independent Counsel.

Comey’s own personal security detail ratted him out with hard evidence, confirming allegations that the Russian probe is a corrupt witch hunt. At the end of the newly infamous “eight-day gap,” during which the conspiracy was plotted in retaliation, Mueller was appointed Grand Inquisitor and started gathering firewood to burn President Trump at the stake.

That is something Comey failed to mention in his recent “tell-all” book.

“High-level FBI sources” are spilling their guts about Comey’s flight home from Los Angeles in disgrace. “Insiders with direct knowledge” warmed things up by divulging confidential details of the in-flight phone call that Comey made to Mueller from his DOJ chartered Gulfstream.

Mueller never disclosed any talks with Comey either. Especially none occurring in the eight days that elapsed between Comey’s termination and Mueller’s appointment as Special Counsel to lead the Trump-Russia investigation.

The only people besides Comey and Mueller who could possibly know of the clandestine call on May 9, are five male FBI agents, who were part of the ex-Director’s security detail, and the civilian flight crew. The Justice Department chartered the twin-engine “Aerospace” from a private corporation.

Exactly a week after Comey flew home from the Los Angeles field office after being dismissed, his leak about rear-end covering memos was published by the New York Times. He led the press to believe he had proof that President Trump asked him to “rig the Michael Flynn investigation.”

Comey never expected his memos to actually see the light of day. He made the determination himself that some of them were classified. Now that they were made public, they prove no such thing ever happened.

Hours after the article based on Comey’s classified, misleading information, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as U.S. Special Counsel. The move was made specifically to show the American public they can “have full confidence in the outcome.”

Because of all the public interest, someone “who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command,” Rosenstein explained, must head the investigation. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was not in charge because he exercised an abundance of caution and “recused himself.”

Federal law forbids individual DOJ officials from investigating any political campaign that they participated in and Sessions helped campaign for President Trump. What nobody knew until now is that Mueller was hand-picked to lead the probe in the direction they wanted it to go, against President Trump.

Nobody said a word about the hours Comey and the so-called “independent investigator” had their heads together plotting the best way to do in Donald Trump. Rosenstein didn’t even run the idea past Sessions before announcing the decision Mueller had been hired.

That was a busy week for the FBI branch of the Hillary Clinton fan club. They worked out their “next moves” quietly, behind the scenes.

Even though the first thing that Mueller did after being appointed was coach Comey on what to tell the Senate Intelligence Committee, not a single lawmaker has asked him if he talked to Mueller before his appointment.

Just the fact the grand inquisitor himself was advising Comey on how to answer congressional questions is suspicious all by itself.

Looking back with the 20-20 vision of hindsight, it appears that Comey leaked his memos at Mueller’s suggestion, virtually engineering Mueller’s subsequent Special Counsel appointment.

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok may have been part of Comey’s “legal team” at the time. We already know that the lovers exchanged Trump hate tweets and came up with some kind of “insurance policy” in Deputy FBI Director “Andy” McCabe’s office.

Comey’s second in command was just as nervous as they were. By then it was obvious that President Trump had a viable chance of getting elected.

Comey and Mueller “are career bureaucrats and very slick,” one of the sources warns. “They both know the system’s ins and outs and on top of that, they are friends.”

As Comey sat under the hot lights for grilling by the Senate, over and over again he told the committee how well Robert Mueller would fit the job description of investigating the new President on charges of election tampering with Russian help.

“Bob Mueller is one of this country’s great pros and I’m sure you’ll be able to work it out with him to run it in parallel,” he testified.

Just because he worked together with Mueller since the early ‘90’s and the fact they are close friends is no reason to think the recommendation could be, in any way, biased. In his book, Comey tries very hard to shove Mueller off at arm’s length. Even though the two shared dinners and played golf, “he and I are not close friends.”

They may not be close, but Comey called Mueller before he called his wife, someone on the plane security detail says. Now we wait for the letters followed by subpoenas for “any and all” phone or email records for both Comey and Mueller that week.

 

THEY NEVER EXPECTED THEIR SCHEME TO FAIL. THEY NEVER EXPECTED HILLARY TO LOSE !

THEY NEVER EXPECTED THEIR SCHEME TO FAIL. THEY  NEVER EXPECTED HILLARY TO LOSE !

THE WHOLE DEEP STATE COUP PLAN EXPOSED !

SO NOW THEY GET CAUGHT.. WILL JEFF SESSIONS DID NOTHING ABOUT IT.. HE  WAS TOO TERRIFIED TO ! HE DID NOT WANT TO JOING THE DEAD POOL OF OBAMA AND HILLARY "DEAD PEOPLE SOCIETY!"

He was useless as a  Law and Order Attorney General. He was a cowardly Establishment TROJAN Horse.. OR A SIMPLE POLITICAL EUNUCH..

The FOOL WAS ELEVATED WAY ABOVE HIS PAY GRADE BY DONALD TRUMP?

FBI Never Investigated Abedin/Clinton Laptop Emails In October 2016…

As many people are aware, CTH has decided to go back through two years of documents, releases, reports, testimony, media interviews; including interviews with fired FBI Director James Comey; question all prior assumptions; re-examine the entire framework within all the known granular DOJ and FBI activity; and finally contrast it all against the full scope of released messaging between FBI Agent Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
Within this project some breakout discoveries need to be highlighted. One of those discoveries pertains to the Fox News interview with James Comey and Bret Baier.
Within the interview Mr. Comey is questioned about the announcement of re-opening of the Hillary Clinton email investigation on October 28th, 2016.  In his response to why there was a delay between the FBI being notified by New York on September 28th, and waiting until October 28th, James Comey revealed a very important nugget.
The New York U.S. Attorney (SDNY) called Main Justice in DC to ask about why they were not receiving authority for a search warrant. We knew that call took place on October 21st, 2016.  Now we know “why” and who New York called at DOJ HQ.
Listen closely to James Comey at 06:06 to 07:30 of the interview (prompted):

Baier: “Did you know that Andrew McCabe, your deputy, had sat on that revelation about the emails”?
Comey: “Yeah, I don’t know that, I don’t know that to be the case. I do know that New York and FBI headquarters became aware that there may be some connection between Weiner’s laptop and the Clinton investigation, weeks before it was brought to me for decision – and as I write in the book I don’t know whether they could have moved faster and why the delay”
Baier: “Was it the threat that New York Agents were going to leak that it existed really what drove you to the ‘not conceal’ part?
Comey: “I don’t think so. I think what actually drove it was the prosecutors in New York who were working the criminal case against Weiner called down to headquarters and said ‘are we getting a search warrant or not for this’?  That caused, I’m sorry, Justice Department Headquarters, to then call across the street to the FBI and poke the organization; and they start to move much more quickly. I don’t know why there was, if there was slow activity, why it was slow for those first couple of weeks.”

There’s some really sketchy stuff going on in that answer. Why would SDNY need to get authorization for a search warrant from DC, if this is about Weiner’s laptop?  Yes, you could argue it pertains to a tightly held Clinton investigation run out of DC but the Weiner prosecution issues shouldn’t require approval from DC.
But let’s take Comey at face-value…. So there we discover it was justice officials within SDNY (Southern District of New York) who called Main Justice (DOJ in DC) and asked about a needed search warrant for “this”, presumably Weiner’s laptop by inference.  Now, let’s go look at the Page/Strzok description of what was going on.
Here are the messages from Lisa Page and Peter Strzok surrounding the original date that New York officials notified Washington DC FBI.  It’s important to note the two different entities: DOJ -vs- FBI.
According to the September 28, 2016, messages from FBI Agent Peter Strzok it was the SDNY in New York telling Andrew McCabe in DC about the issue.  


Pay close attention to the convo:

(pdf source for all messages here)

Notice: “hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s attorney to SDNY”.
Pay super close attention.  This is not an outcome of a New York Police Dept. raid on Anthony Weiner.  This is Weiner’s attorney going to the U.S. attorney and voluntarily turning over emails. The emails were not turned over to the FBI in New York, the actual emails were turned over to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District.
Key point here: Weiner’s attorneys turned over “emails”.  Actual “emails”.
♦If the U.S. Attorney in New York has the actual physical emails on September 28th, 2016, why would they need a search warrant on October 21st, 2016? (Comey’s call explanation)
♦Why would Weiner’s attorney be handing over evidence?
Think about this carefully.  I’ll get back to the importance of it later; but what I suspect is that Weiner had physical material that was his “insurance policy” against anything done to him by Hillary Clinton.  Facing a criminal prosecution Weiner’s lawyer went to the U.S. Attorney and attempted to exploit/leverage the content therein on his client’s behalf.
Fast forward three weeks, and we go back to FBI in DC.
On October 21, 2016, this is the call referenced by James Comey in the Bret Baier interview.  Someone from New York called “Main Justice” (the DOJ National Security Division in DC) and notified DOJ-NSD Deputy Asst. Attorney General George Toscas of the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails via the “weiner investigation”.
[I would point out again, he’s not being notified of a laptop, Toscas is notified of “emails”]
George Toscas “wanted to ensure information got to Andy“, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe…. so he called FBI Agent Peter Strzok…. who told George Toscas “we know”.
Peter Strzok then tells Bill Priestap.
Of course, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe already knew about the emails since September 28th, 2016, more than three weeks earlier.
In his Bret Baier interview FBI Director James Comey says this call is about a search warrant.  There is no indication the call is actually about a search warrant.  [Nor would there be a need for a search warrant if the call was actually about the emails that Wiener’s attorney dropped off on 9/21].
However, that phone call kicks off an internal debate about the previously closed Clinton email investigation; and Andrew McCabe sitting on the notification from New York for over three weeks – kicks off an internal FBI discussion about McCabe needing to recuse himself.
Now it’s October 27th, 2016, James Comey chief-of-staff Jim Rybicki wants McCabe to recuse himself.  But Rybicki is alone on an island. Lisa Page is furious at such a suggestion, partly because she is McCabe’s legal counsel and if McCabe is recused so too is she.
At the same time as they are debating how to handle the Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton emails, they are leaking to the media to frame a specific narrative.
Important to note here, that at no time is there any conversation -or hint of a conversation- that anyone is reviewing the content of the emails.  The discussions don’t mention a single word about content… every scintilla of conversation is about how to handle the issues of the emails themselves.  Actually, there’s not a single person mentioned in thousands of text messages that applies to an actual person who is looking at any content.
Quite simply: there is a glaringly transparent lack of an “investigation”.
Within this “tight group” at FBI, as Comey puts it, there is not a single mention of a person who is sitting somewhere looking through the reported “600,000” Clinton emails that was widely reported by media.  There’s absolutely ZERO evidence of anyone looking at emails or scouring through laptop data…. and FBI Agent Peter Strzok has no staff under him who he discusses assigned to such a task…. and Strzok damned sure ain’t doing it.  So what gives?
Moving on – Note to readers. Click the graphics and read the notes on them too:
It’s still October 27th, 2016, the day before James Comey announces his FBI decision to re-open the Clinton investigation.  Jim Rybicki still saying McCabe should be recused from input; everyone else, including FBI Legal Counsel James Baker, is disagreeing with Rybicki and siding with Lisa Page.
Meanwhile the conversation has shifted slightly to “PC”, probable cause.  Read:

While Lisa Page is leaking stories to Devlin Barrett (Wall Street Journal), the internal discussion amid the “small group” is about probable cause.
The team is now saying if there was no probable cause when Comey closed the original email investigation in July 2016 (remember the very tight boundaries of review), then there’s no probable cause in October 2016 to reopen the investigation regardless of what the email content might be.
This appears to be how the “small group” or “tight team” justify doing nothing with the content received from New York.  They received the emails September 28th and it’s now October 27th, and they haven’t even looked at it.  Heck, they are debating if there’s even a need to look at it.
Then on October 28th, 2016, the FBI and Main Justice officials have a conference call about the entire Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton email issue.  Here’s where it gets interesting.
George Toscas and David Laufman from DOJ-NSD articulate a position that something needs to happen likely because Main Justice is concerned about the issue of FBI (McCabe) sitting on the emails for over three weeks without any feedback to SDNY (New York).
Thanks to Deputy Director McCabe, Main Justice in DC, specifically DOJ National Security Division, now looks like they are facilitating a cover-up operation being conducted by the FBI “small group”.  [which is actually true, but they can’t let that be so glaringly obvious].
As a result of the Top-Tier officials conference call, Strzok is grumpy agent because his opinion appears to be insignificant.  The decision is reached to announce the re-opening of the investigation.  This sends Lisa Page bananas…

…In rapid response mode Lisa Page reaches out to Devlin Barrett, again to quickly shape the media coverage.  Now that the world is aware of the need for a Clinton email investigation 2.0 the internal conversation returns to McCabe’s recusal.
Please note that at no time in the FBI is anyone directing an actual investigation of the content of the Clinton emails.  Every single second of every effort is devoted to shaping the public perception of the need for the investigation.  Every media outlet is being watched; every article is being read; and the entire apparatus of the small group is shaping coverage therein by contacting their leak outlets.
So let’s go back to that Comey interview:

♦What exactly would SDNY need a search warrant for?

♦Anthony Weiner’s lawyer has delivered SDNY actual emails.  Why would he do that?

Now lets connect those questions to an earlier report.

According to ABC News Comey writes in “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership,” that he became the public face of the investigation partly because of a mysterious development which he felt could cast “serious doubt” on Lynch’s independence.

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

On page six of the IG report on Andrew McCabe (point number 4) we find a conference call between Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and the FBI field office in New York where the subject of the Weiner/Abedin/Clinton email findings overlap with: the Clinton Foundation (CF) investigation; the Clinton Email investigation; pressure for Asst. Director McCabe to recuse himself, and Washington DC via Loretta Lynch using DOJ Main Justice leverage from the Eric Garner case against the NY FBI office and New York Police Department.

From the OIG report:

4. The Attorney General Expresses Strong Concerns to McCabe and other FBI Officials about Leaks, and McCabe Discusses Recusing Himself from CF Investigation (October 26, 2016)

McCabe told the OIG that during the October 2016 time frame, it was his “perception that there was a lot of information coming out of likely the [FBI’s] New York Field Office” that was ending up in the news. McCabe told the OIG that he “had some heated back-and-forths” with the New York Assistant Director in Charge (“NY-ADIC”) over the issue of media leaks.
On October 26th, 2016, McCabe and NY-ADIC participated in what McCabe described as “a hastily convened conference call with the Attorney General who delivered the same message to us” about leaks, with specific focus being on leaks regarding the high-profile investigation by FBI’s New York Field Office into the death of Eric Garner. McCabe told us that he “never heard her use more forceful language.” NY-ADIC confirmed that the participants got “ripped by the AG on leaks.”
According to NY-ADIC’s testimony and an e-mail he sent to himself on October 31, McCabe indicated to NY-ADIC and a then-FBI Executive Assistant Director (“EAD”) in a conversation after Attorney General Lynch disconnected from the call that McCabe was recusing himself from the CF Investigation.
(Page #6 and #7 – IG Report Link)

What makes this explosive is the timing, and what we now know about what was going on amid the FBI “small group” in DC.
On September 28th, 2016, Andrew McCabe was made aware of emails given to New York U.S. Attorney (SDNY) directly from Anthony Weiner’s lawyer.  Again, the information relayed to DC is not about a Weiner laptop, it’s about actual emails delivered by Weiner’s lawyer.  The laptop was evidence in the Weiner “sexting” case involving a minor; however, the laptop did, reportedly, also contained thousands of State Department documents from Hillary Clinton and her aide Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife.
When Weiner’s lawyer walked into SDNY to deliver his leverage emails, Preet Bharara, a Clinton-Lynch ally, was the United States Attorney.
Again, look at the text messages between FBI Agent Peter Strzok (Inbox) and FBI Special Counsel to Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page (Outbox):

[The letter to “Congress” at the end of the text exchange relates to notification of the re-opening of the Clinton investigation – Actual date of notification 10/28/16]
According to later reporting, FBI Director James Comey was not notified of the emails until after October 21st, 2016.  However, in late October and early November, there were reports from people with contacts in New York police and New York FBI, about Washington DOJ officials interfering with the Weiner investigation.
On the same date (October 26th, 2016) as the Lynch, McCabe and NY FBI phone call, former NY Mayor Rudy Giuilani was telling Fox News that an explosive development was forthcoming.   Two days later, October 28th, 2016, Congress was notified of the additional Clinton emails.
However, a few more days later, November 4th, 2016, an even more explosive development as Erik Prince appeared on radio and outlined discoveries within the Huma Abedin/Anthony Weiner/Hillary Clinton email issues that was being blocked by AG Lynch.

Prince claimed he had insider knowledge of the investigation that could help explain why FBI Director James Comey had to announce he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email server last week.
“Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, through a warrant, they searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing,” Prince claimed.
“They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said.
“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.
“I believe – I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said. (Link)

An earlier Grand Jury in New York had refused to return an indictment against the NYPD in the Garner case.  As an outcome of that grand jury finding, and as an outcome of their own investigation, the local FBI office and Eastern District of New York DOJ office was not trying to pursue criminal charges against the NYPD officers involved.  This created a dispute because federal prosecutors (EDNY) and FBI officials in New York opposed bringing charges, while prosecutors with the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department in Washington argued there was clear evidence to do so.
On October 25th, 2016, Loretta Lynch replaced the EDNY New York prosecutors:

New York Times (Oct. 25)  – The Justice Department has replaced the New York team of agents and lawyers investigating the death of Eric Garner, officials said, a highly unusual shake-up that could jump-start the long-stalled case and put the government back on track to seek criminal charges.

With that move – on Oct. 25th, 2016, AG Lynch was now in position to threaten criminal prosecutions against the NYPD, and repercussions against the NY FBI and EDNY using the Garner case as leverage, just like Erik Prince outlined in the phone interview above.
Additionally, we see confirmation from the IG report, the Garner case was brought up in the next day (Oct 26, 2016) phone call to the NY FBI field office; just as Erik Prince outlined.  Obviously Prince’s sources were close to the events as they unfolded.
The NY FBI and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) were threatened by Washington DC Main Justice and FBI, via Loretta Lynch and Andrew McCabe to drop the Clinton/Abedin/Weiner email investigation matters, or else the Garner DOJ Civil Rights Division would be used as leverage against the NYPD.  And Loretta Lynch had SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara as the enforcer waiting for her call.
And so it was…

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

The emails Anthony Weiner’s lawyer brought to Preet Bharara was Weiner’s leverage to escape prosecution.  Likely those emails were exactly as Eric Prince sources outlined.  However, the SDNY responding to upper level leadership buried those emails.
In DC the FBI (Comey and McCabe) created the appearance of a re-opening of the Clinton investigation to keep control and ensure the investigative outcomes remained out of the hands of the Eastern District (EDNY) and New York FBI field office.  They had no choice.
However, once the FBI opened the investigation October 28th, they did exactly the same thing they had done from September 28th to October 28th… they did nothing.
A few days later they declared the second investigation closed, and that was that.
They never expected her to lose.

SUPPORT TRUMP IF YOU LOVE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC :: CIA Whistleblower: Trump Is Doing What Kennedy Tried To

Via Greg Hunters' USA Watchdog blog,

Former CIA Officer and whistleblower Kevin Shipp says what is going on with Donald J. Trump “is an ongoing coup to remove a duly elected President.” Shipp contends, “This is a huge constitutional crisis like the country has never seen before. This makes Watergate look like a Sunday school class.”
On Friday, Shipp and other retired top officials at the CIA, FBI, DOJ and NSA held a press conference and demanded Attorney General Jeff Sessions prosecute top Obama era officials for obvious crimes against the incoming Trump Administration. Shipp says,

“We have a coup within our government right now at the senior levels at the CIA, DOJ and the FBI attempting to unseat a duly elected President who was elected by the American people and remove him from office...
This is, at worst, treason with senior officials in the shadow government or Deep State . . . to attack Donald Trump and remove him from office. . . . We have not seen anything like this since the Presidency of John F. Kennedy (JFK), when CIA Director Allen Dulles attacked him, and we saw what happened there...
There is crystal clear evidence that the CIA was, at least, involved with the cover-up of the JFK assassination.  Now, we have the same thing happening again...
Remember what Chuck Schumer said, and it was chilling.  He said, ‘If you cross the intelligence community, they can hit back at you six ways from Sunday.’  That’s what we are seeing now.  It’s collusion or a coup with senior officials at the FBI, DOJ and CIA along with Robert Mueller to unseat an elected president.”

Shipp goes on to explain, “There is essentially a civil war involving parts of senior management and upper parts of our government that is occurring in the United States. It’s between the ‘Dark’ side and the ‘Constitutional’ side."

"There has never been anything like this in history.  It is extremely serious, and this is an extremely serious hour for our government and especially for our constitutional freedoms...
This essentially is a global criminal cabal that has penetrated into our government and now has senior level officials colluding and, I would argue, conspiring to unseat this president.”

In closing, Shipp says, “People need to understand that the Democrat Party today is not the Democrat Party of John F. Kennedy."

"The Democrat Party with Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton is more Marxist than anything else.  They think the Constitution should be a ‘progressive’ document.  In other words, the Constitution is outdated and should be redone.  They are both directly connected into George Soros, who wants to destroy the sovereignty of the U.S. government...
The Democrat Party is now made up of Marxists and leftists that have penetrated that entire organization. . . . Their entire goal is to change our form of government and destroy our sovereignty.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with CIA whistleblower Kevin Shipp, founder of the website ForTheLoveofFreedom.net.

THE "INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES" were weaponized to ensure HILLARY CLINTON WON.

THE "INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES" Under the leadership of John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey and the Justice Department under Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch.. were weaponized to ensure HILLARY CLINTON WON.

It was as much the ideology of the these Lefty Bastards who came of age in the 1960's and believed that America should be taken down.. BUT IT ALSO WAS FOR THE FACT THAT ALL OF THEM GOT PAID OFF AND THEY NEEDED TO COVER THEIR TRACKS.

Remember back during the transition Sen. Chuck Schumer on one of the Sunday shows said that when President-elect Trump expressed concerned about the leaks he had to be careful. Remember, Schumer said, the intelligence community has six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.

Yup.. Chucky knew what was going on. He was the Selected Swamp creature that was placed to take over from Harry Reid! 

When I heard that statement, I said to myself.. "These fuckers are playing hardball exactly like they said they would"

Unelected bought and paid for assholes are getting back at folks who stood in front of the voters, name on the ballot, and were elected by we the people. Unless we hit back hard.. they get away with it!
Yes my friends..The Deep State is fighting to cover its tracks and hide the Hundreds of millions of dollars it has received in Bit Coin Crypto Currency, Book deals, Campaign Contributions, Speaking Fees, paid off homes etc etc. George Soros the Money Man God Father of the movement open his fat wallet and fed the Beast $ 5 Billion Dollars. 

Now three years after we learned about Hillary Clinton’s private email server, we still don’t have all of her emails. It’s almost two years since the FBI investigation ended. We still don’t have all of her emails, and we don’t have all the files related to the investigation. 

The government keeps slow walking. They keep obstructing. And so all we have are the leaks from the Deep State, and that’s a problem. The American public doesn’t know what to believe because we don’t have the full picture.

and to add to all of this. Jeff Sessions is no Elliot Ness. he is a weak kneed Nipple High Paid off Political Eunuch who will cover his sorry midget ass and protect all this because he wants to stay alive !

I AM TELLING YOU NOW PATRIOTS.. WE HAVE TO DRAIN THE SWAMP! NOW ! RUCK UP AND GET READY TO RUMBLE IN THE STREETS AGAINST THESE ASSHOLES !

How many Africans were taken to the United States during the entire history of the slave trade?

MORE FACTS THE SOCIALIST MEDIA AND THE PROGRESSIVES WILL NOT TELL YOU ABOUT THE SLAVE TRADE

Amazing Fact About the Negros brought to America. How many Africans were taken to the United States during the entire history of the slave trade?

The most comprehensive analysis of shipping records over the course of the slave trade is the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, edited by professors David Eltis and David Richardson. (While the editors are careful to say that all of their figures are estimates, I believe that they are the best estimates that we have, the proverbial "gold standard" in the field of the study of the slave trade.) Between 1525 and 1866, in the entire history of the slave trade to the New World, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.

And how many of these 10.7 million Africans were shipped directly to North America? Only about 388,000. That's right: a tiny percentage.

In fact, the overwhelming percentage of the African slaves were shipped directly to the Caribbean and South America; Brazil received 4.86 million Africans alone! Some scholars estimate that another 60,000 to 70,000 Africans ended up in the United States after touching down in the Caribbean first, so that would bring the total to approximately 450,000 Africans who arrived in the United States over the course of the slave trade.

THATS RIGHTS.... 450,000 Africans were brought to the United States over the course of the slave trade between 1525 and 1866.
In Comparison.. African slaves were brought into Brazil as early as 1530, with abolition in 1888. During those three centuries, Brazil received 4,000,000 Africans, over four times as many as any other American destination.
Here is a site to track the slave trade.

https://www.slavevoyages.org/

WANT A DETAILED TIME LINE ??

CLICK HERE  https://www.slavevoyages.org/voyage/database#animation

The Left is taking away our rights and freedoms a small little bit at a time...

CONSERVATIVE AMERICANS...If what the Left is doing does not affect you yet... do not be so smug!

Like Adolf Hitler, The Socialist Oligarchs who have usurped the political System in America have been taking away our rights and freedoms a small little bit at a time...


✅ First they came for our Privacy Rights as Citizens and we did nothing.. because it did not affect us much.

✅ Then they came for our right to teach the children our truth and we did nothing .... because our children were not affected directly.

✅ Then they came for our Healthcare system with a plan to ultimately have Universal Healthcare which is the Keystone of Socialism.. and all we did was complain.. because we were too involved with our daily lives to remove the perpetrators of this crime

✅ Then they came after the right to defend our borders but we did nothing... because we did not live that close to a border.

✅ Then they came after our way of voting with a ballot box and replaced it with electronic ballot machines and we did nothing... because we did not believe it would affect our votes.

✅ Then the stacked the bureaucracy with their ideologues and we did nothing ...because we did not understand their method of destroying our laws.

✅ Then they attacked our Capitalist System and destroyed our economic system with massive deficits and we did nothing ... because we still had money to spend.

✅ Then they installed their political operatives in Government and we complained but did nothing else... because we were too busy trying to make ends meet.

✅ Then they changed the rules in immigration and let in millions of people who were not like us and we complained on social media and nothing else.. because we were too busy with our own lives.

✅ Then they slowly removed the Judeo-Christian code from the fabric of our society in the name of multiculturalism and we did nothing ... because we were afraid we would be called Racist if we objected.

✅ Then they infiltrated the News Media and planted their own propagandists pretending to be Newsmen and we did nothing but complain... because we had "alternative" media to use.

✅ Then they Infiltrated the Social Media like Twitter and Facebook and began banning all things that pertain to our culture and values.. and we complained some more...because we are not cohesive to act as one to tear them down.

✅ Then THEY HIRED MEN AND WOMEN TO RUN OUR FBI AND OUR DOJ AND OUR SUPREME COURT AND FEDERAL COURTS WHO FLAUNT THE LAW AND RULE AGAINST THE PEOPLE AND DARE US TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT . ( FBI in the case of Hillary as an example)
BUT WE ARE COWARDS WHO COLLECTIVELY DO NOT HAVE THE COURAGE OR THE WILL TO TAKE UP ARMS AND STAND SHOULDER TO SHOULDER TO TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY....

✅ Soon they will take away your ability to buy bullets so you guns will only be usable as clubs

✅ Soon they will control the Internet and all Social media and control your ability to communicate.

✅ Soon they will control your Religious beliefs, your children, your Money and Gold, tax your 401K, limit your property rights and mandate your Healthcare requirements and ultimately your American way of life with smaller government. 

 
✅ Big Brother Government will soon find excuses to limit your freedom of speech, you freedom of travel, your access to real news and information and you will end up being spoon fed what they want you to know and hear and see. Censorship is a election cycle away!

 
✅ AND THEN YOU WILL LOOK AROUND YOU AND SAY AS THOUGH YOU DID NOT SEE IT COMING...

"WOW"!!! IT ALL HAPPENED SO SUDDENLY!!

 

Fight back noww My Fellow Americans while we still have our guns and our limited Freedom of Speech. 

Time is shorter than you think. The enemies of America are arrayed to steal America one way or another. They already control the voting apparatus as you have read in my previous posts. 

I have warned the Complacent Trump Admin about the voting machines.

They are planning to steal America! 

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS

Facebook spying to collect your Data Long Term

💢💢💢🛑🛑📣📣📣🔈⛔⚠️⚠️⚠️❌❌❌❗

ATTENTION ALL AMERICANS!!

💢💢💢🛑🛑📣📣📣🔈⛔⚠️⚠️⚠️❌❌❌❗

WARNING! SHARE AND GET OUT QUICK..

Facebook is Stealing our DATA

Today its for Profit.. but Tomorrow it could be arrest us! ⚠️⚠️⚠️ PLEASE SHARE NOW !
YOU ARE BEING SPIED ON ON! ORDERED BY FACEBOOK. THE DATA MIGHT ALREADY BE IN THE HANDS OF GEORGE SOROS AND SOCIALIST OLIGARCHS!
Facebook Is now even Stealing Hospital Records of Their Users For Advanced Spying Programs
Facebook has asked several major U.S. hospitals to share data about their patients, such as illnesses and prescription info, for a proposed research project. Facebook was intending to match it up with user data it had collected, and help the hospitals figure out which patients might need special care or treatment. (Right !! )
Cambridge Analytica data leak scandal has raised public concerns over how Facebook and others collect and use detailed information about Facebook users.
But as recently as last month, the company was talking to several health organizations, including Stanford Medical School and American College of Cardiology, about signing the data-sharing agreement.
They claim that the data shared would obscure personally identifiable information, such as the patient's name, Facebook proposed using a common computer science technique called "hashing" to match individuals who existed in both sets. Facebook says the data would have been used only for research conducted by the medical community. If you believe that you probably believe Facebook is not Censoring Conservatives!
The project raised new concerns about the massive amount of data Facebook collects about its users, and how this data can be used in ways users never expected.
That issue has been in the spotlight after reports that Mark Zuckerberg gave the Obama Campaign massive amounts of data for Free in 2012 so that it could manipulate political discourse. It also has given Cambridge Analytica, a political research organization that did work for Donald Trump, Yes all kinds of detailed information about Facebook users without their permission. Remember facebook has asked for ID in the past.. particularly from users with large followings!
Facebook said on Wednesday that as many as 187 million people's data might have been shared this way. T
WHAT IS BUILDING 8?
The exploratory effort to share medical-related data was led by an interventional cardiologist called Freddy Abnousi, who describes his role on LinkedIn as "leading top-secret projects." It was under the purview of Regina Dugan, the head of Facebook's "Building 8" experiment projects group, before she left in October 2017. Now the whole project has gone underground.
Facebook's pitch, according to two people who heard it and one who is familiar with the project, was to combine what a health system knows about its patients (such as: person has heart disease, is age 50, takes 2 medications and made 3 trips to the hospital this year) with what Facebook knows (such as: user is age 50, married with 3 kids, English isn't a primary language, actively engages with the community by sending a lot of messages).
The project would then figure out if this combined information could improve patient care, initially with a focus on cardiovascular health. For instance, if Facebook could determine that an elderly patient doesn't have many nearby close friends or much community support, the health system might decide to send over a nurse to check in after a major surgery.
GET THE PICTURE ?
Then they can use that info any way they choose WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION !
Facebook gets your "anonymous medical data" from the Hospitals!
Then they can geo track to link you to the info.
You might have posted... "going in for Gall Bladder surgery".. then they track all those in your area that had the surgery to when you went to a Hospital in your area and connect the post with their snoop algorithm!
They can use this kind of information in many ways.
Then they can use that info any way they choose WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION !
YOU ARE BEING SPIED ON AND YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW IT!

THEIR ALGORITHM KEEPS US SEPARATE BY INTENT. SOMEONE WROTE THE ALGORITHM AND IT WAS APPROVED BY FACEBOOK.. SO THEY OWN IT!

Go back 4 years on my page and you will see that with far fewer Friends and Followers I had more that 1000 likes and shares per post!

We all need to be aware that FACEBOOK IS INTENTIONALLY CENSORING US!

The Algorithm sorts by sequential multiple factors.
1. Conservative.... Y or No
2. Pro Gun .. Y or No
3. Pro Life Y or No
4. Pro Legal Immigration Y or No
5.Pro Republican Y or No
6. Pro Trump Y or No
7. Large group of followers and Friends..
500-1000,
1000-5000
5000- 10,000
10,000- 20,000


Hell by the end of this sort... people like me have very little impact within this social Media program.

If it works and no one stops them then Twitter and Youtube and other Media will join the censorship and if we still do nothing I wager that they will finally shut down Trump and any Republican who dares to confront the ideology they support. Its comin if we do not have a Revolution. Its your choice! Fight now or lose it all!

IT IS VERY SIMPLE TO WRITE THIS KIND OF CODE!
FACEBOOK NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED FOR WHAT IT IS DOING!

It has stolen our data and they are now profiting on our information while the destroy our Republic!

THIS MUST STOP.