Sunday, March 31, 2019


    TWITTER HAS SHUT ME DOWN COMPLETELY 

     THIS IS CENSORSHIP OF CONSERVATIVES!






  1. John Gaultier

    John Gaultier

    @JohnGaltier

    I AM A FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE.American Patriot. 100% for
    San Antonio, TX
    facebook.com/TPFAR
    Joined December 2011
    1,796 Photos and videos
    Your Tweet activity
    Your Tweets earned 3,209 impressions over the last 24 hours
    7PM
    7PM
    View your top Tweets

    ·
    · View all


    Find people you know Import your contacts from Gmail

    Trends for you

    · Change Change trend settings

    Tweets

    1. 1h1 hour ago
    John Gaultier Retweeted John Gaultier
    Friends..READ AND RE TWEET!
    John Gaultier added,

    🤯🤯🤯🤯 EXPLOSIVE NEW INFO ! WOW ! 🤯🤯🤯🤯 …
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
  3. 4h4 hours ago

    4. The noose is tightening.. Hillary will have to squeal and make a deal.. I THINK HILLARY WILL COMMIT SUICIDE PRETTY SOON ( Yeah they will do to her what her thugs did to so many other people. Then they will Eulogize her and Cover their tracks. The powers are bigger than her!
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  5. 4h4 hours ago

    6. John Gaultier Retweeted Fox News
    EXACTLY! This is what emboldened assholes do in any country that gives them a break. Its the same with Muslims all over Europe. ARE WE AS STUPID AS THE EUROPEANS? I THINK NOT!
    John Gaultier added,


    8:29
    .: “Citizenship is a privilege. We don’t grant it to people because they think they deserve it.”
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  7. Retweeted
    6h6 hours ago

    8. Replying to
    yes--exactly correct. Rosenstein is aiding & protecting the guilty DOJ/FBI. And what's worse AG Sessions has defended Rosenstein as being "a good man" FIRE THEM BOTH ASAP Pres, Trump..
    0 replies 1 retweet 1 like





  9. 6h6 hours ago

    10. Rod Rosenstein should not have any position in President Trump’s administration, let alone one with so much power to harm the Office of the Presidency.
    1 reply 0 retweets 1 like





  11. 6h6 hours ago

    12. Loretta Lynch As Attorney General used a Bogus email name JUST LIKE OBAMA!
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  13. 7h7 hours ago

    14. FACEBOOK & TWITTER CENSORS CONSERVATIVES. CONGRESS MUST BREAK IT UP UNDER MONOPOLIES ACT! We must ask CONGRESS & Trump Admin to file an Anti Monopoly Lawsuit against Facebook & TWITTER
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  15. 7h7 hours ago

    16. Who is John Podesta? Here's everything you need to know! THIS IS JOHN PODESTA! Handmaiden to George Soros Paid whore and Leftist Money Raker!
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  17. 7h7 hours ago

    18. Breaking News. Hillary Clinton broke the same Campaign Laws that Dinesh Desouza did. He was locked up Shouldn't she be ? LOCK HER UP JEFF SESSIONS!
    0 replies 3 retweets 4 likes





  19. 7h7 hours ago

    20. Rod Rosenstein SECRETLY EXPANDED THE SCOPE of Mueller Probe? Where is Jeff Sessions?
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  21. 7h7 hours ago

    22. SHADOW BANNING ... HOW FACEBOOK AND THE SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS CENSOR CONSERVATIVES EXPOSED: FACEBOOK IS SHADOW BANNING ME AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER CONSERVATIVES.
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  23. 7h7 hours ago

    24. THE DACA CON:
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  25. 7h7 hours ago

    26. THE OBAMA CLINTON FBI DOJ CONNECTION. Once you understand it everything makes sense.
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes





  27. 7h7 hours ago

    28. Yes take America Back to the Good Old Days when America was "AMERICA" I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS.
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  29. Retweeted
    11h11 hours ago

    30. Headline.ws Retweeted Scott Baio
    A male Hollywood actor supporting & movement is prime target. We live in social media era where accused is guilty on accusation alone. Do your own research & hear both sides before casting judgment. Better yet, let courts & God cast judgment.
    Headline.ws added,

    My Facebook live statement about the claims.
    8 replies 104 retweets 166 likes





  31. 8h8 hours ago

    32. John Gaultier Retweeted John Gaultier
    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 GAME ON... and arrest the illegals!
    John Gaultier added,

    👮🏼👮🏼👮🏼 GAME ON !! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 Pelosi threatens to bring 'Dreamers' to the State of the Union, Trump fires back that he will bring ICE agents…
    0 replies 1 retweet 3 likes





  33. 8h8 hours ago

    34. 👮🏼👮🏼👮🏼 GAME ON !! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 Pelosi threatens to bring 'Dreamers' to the State of the Union, Trump fires back that he will bring ICE agents GAME ON 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
    1 reply 4 retweets 10 likes





  35. 9h9 hours ago

    36. Working with Democrats is like working with the Camel. Once you figure that out... negotiations can be adjusted. are you listening??
    0 replies 1 retweet 1 like





  37. 9h9 hours ago

    38. John Gaultier Retweeted Tom Fitton
    It's a race against the Trump Removal Clock. They have a plan to remove Trump and anything that inhibits that progress will be handed over very very slowly.
    John Gaultier added,

    " knew there were text messages to be had. We sued back in Sept for texts of the # two at the FBI, Andrew McCabe. And they just told us this week they gave us everything they were gonna give us and not one text message was turned over."
    0 replies 0 retweets 1 like





  39. 9h9 hours ago

    40. John Gaultier Retweeted Ava Armstrong
    John Gaultier added,

    Organizing For Action A nice name for sedition, treason. This sick bastard is dangerous.…
    0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    (1) This is . He is in his 40s. He works for the . He was the only person to interview , with no recording, on her investigation .
    219 replies 1,679 retweets 1,687 likes










  41. Jan 18
    42. (2) How many family members are there? There are only 100 total Americans out of 300 million with this name . You can Google this. must be unique in such a small family, right?
    9 replies 194 retweets 233 likes










  43. Jan 18
    44. (3) The father of (ii) is Peter Strzok Sr, and he was in the Army core of engineers. Oh, he was actually a career expert in sanctions and nuclear activity in .
    6 replies 247 retweets 280 likes










  45. Jan 18
    46. (4) The younger brother of Sr is who works for - They are world leaders in big cranes, with a speciality in moving nuclear Reactors.
    4 replies 220 retweets 253 likes










  47. Jan 18
    48. (5) The son of is , who is a coast guard graduate and now also lives in DC .
    1 reply 146 retweets 191 likes
Posted by at No comments:

Friday, March 29, 2019

THE FUTILE CASE FOR THE DEMS IN THE HOUSE TO TRY AND IMPEACH TRUMP

PATRIOTS.. BE PREPARED TO TAKE UP ARMS!

 THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO PUSH THROUGH AN ILLEGAL IMPEACHMENT PROCESS!

IMPEACHMENT DOES NOT MEAN REMOVAL FROM THE PRESIDENCY. Impeachment is a 3 Part Process. Understand it!


HERE IS THE INFO ON HOW 

 

IMPEACHMENT ACTUALLY WORKS!.

 

The Impeachment Process
A common misconception is that impeachment of an official means his or her removal from office. In fact, impeachment functions as an indictment of a public official; it allows the legislature to bring formal charges against a civil officer of government. After an official has been impeached, or formally charged, a trial is held to determine whether or not the official will be removed from office.
In the US Federal Government, the House of Representatives impeaches government officials and the trial takes place before the Senate. The House votes on the articles of impeachment, requiring a simple majority to pass them. Upon passage of the articles, an individual has been impeached.

Impeachable Offenses
According to the US Constitution, "Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors" justify impeachment, although the exact definition of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" is often the subject of debate. 
Usually, impeachment is reserved for serious offenses and abuses of power, and it is up to the impeaching body to determine whether or not an offense is impeachable. Offenses do not have to violate criminal law in order to be impeachable.
UNLESS THE SENATE TRIES HIM... THERE IS NO REMOVAL FROM OFFICE.

The Trial
After the House of Representatives impeaches, the Senate tries the accused. Senators are sworn in as jurors and rules for the proceedings are established. When a US President is impeached, the Chief Justice of the United States presides; 
A two-thirds majority is required to convict; otherwise, the accused is acquitted. 

The Consequences
A conviction by the Senate brings immediate removal from office. If an official is convicted, the Senate may take a second vote to determine whether or not to bar the official from holding any public office in the future. The Senate trial does not constitute a criminal trial and the Senate decision does not have power beyond removal from office and barring of future public office. The impeached official is still subject to criminal prosecution for any criminal offenses that were included in the articles of impeachment.
ASK THE QUESTION WHY!
The Democrats are desperate to remove Trump before he exposes the Dirty Secrets yet to come out.
Secrets like how the Obama Gang and the Hillary Gang agreed to share the spoils of "Pay to play" so long as the Obama DOJ looked the other way while Hillary and the Clinton Foundation raked in all the money they could. They shared the spoils.

You really think that the Obama and the DOJ did not know about the Clinton Pay to Play? Really ?? Come on now. The Obama gang was the most suspicious and sneaky administration ever. They poked around about everyone and then used their knowledge to blackmail the offenders to get their own ends. They blackmailed the
Last Pope, Angela Merkel and even Chief Justice Roberts to get their ends.
So you really think that some vague Rouge DOJ and FBI heads acted without the implicit approval of the Obama Gang ? Really ? What planet are you from??
Obama despised Hillary and Bill. Why they got together is very simple. Billions and Billions of Dollars at stake to be stolen.

That is why this whole plan was hatched. To prevent the world from ever knowing what they had done during the 8 years of Obama's Crooked Rule! If Clinton won no one would have ever known.
They had to assure that Hillary won so then they could continue on the path to pillage the Treasury of America!

But Trump won and now they are trying to take him out before the path leads back to the Real crooks behind the scenes.


DON'T BE STUPID.. THAT'S WHY THE "Intelligence Idiots" got is wrong intentionally! If the same information given to the real Intelligence Community they would have figured it out in a heartbeat and also would have found themselves "Suicided"

 








WISE UP

ASK YOURSELVES WHY PEOPLE!





Now back to our discussion.

Can the Senate Decline to Try an Impeachment Case?

Does the Senate have an obligation to conduct a trial of the president if the House impeaches him? With the increased prospects for an impeachment inquiry now that the Democrats have taken control of the House of Representatives, most discussions of impeachment have assumed that, should the House vote to impeachment, the Senate will then hold a trial. 
This is the construction of the Constitution’s provisions setting out the impeachment process: If the House impeaches, then it would follow that the Senate tries the case. (This is what the Senate did on the two occasions, in the cases of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, that the House voted articles of impeachment.)
Do the current Senate Rules allow for variance? They contemplate that when the House has voted an impeachment, the Senate will be notified, the House managers will present their case and trial proceedings, which the rules prescribe in some detail, will begin. 
But it is also possible that, based on the Democrats own modification of the rules when Harry Reid made sure that he protected the Obama Presidency in every way he could... it eroded all institutional practices and norms, so...the current leadership of the Senate could choose to play the Harry Reid card as well and could attempt to prevent the trial of a House impeachment of Donald Trump.  A Constitutional scholar would not have to look far to find the constitutional arguments and the flexibility to revise Senate rules and procedures to accomplish this purpose.
The Constitution does not by its express terms direct the Senate to try an impeachment. In fact, it confers on the Senate "the sole power to try,”   ( Or NOT )  which is a conferral of exclusive constitutional authority and not a procedural command.

The Constitution couches the power to impeach in the same terms: it is the House’s “sole power.” The House may choose to impeach or not, and one can imagine an argument that the Senate is just as free, in the exercise of its own “sole power,” to decline to try any impeachment that the House elects to vote.
The current rules governing Senate practice and procedure do not pose an insurmountable problem for this maneuver. Senate leadership can seek to have the rules “reinterpreted” at any time by the device of seeking a ruling of the chair on the question, and avoiding a formal revision of the rule that would require supermajority approval. 

So using the obstructionist Harry Reid Rules in the Senate...The question presented in some form would be whether, under the relevant rules, the Senate is required or NOT to hold an impeachment “trial” fully consistent with current rules—or even any trial at all. A chair’s ruling in the affirmative would be subject to being overturned by a majority, not two-thirds, vote.
It can be argued.. that the rules also cannot constitutionally bind the Senate to a trial of a House impeachment if, in the exercise of its “sole power” to try, it decides against one. In this way, the Senate rule may be “reinterpreted.” 
The Senate has options for scuttling the impeachment process beyond a simple refusal to heed the House vote. The Constitution does not specify what constitutes a “trial,” and in a 1993 case involving a judicial impeachment, the Supreme Court affirmed that the Senate’s “sole power” to “try” means that it is not subject to any limitations on how it could conduct a proceeding. Senate leadership could engineer an early motion to dismiss and effectively moot the current rule’s call for the president or counsel to appear before the Senate. The rules in place provide at any rate only that “the Senate shall have power to compel the attendance of witnesses”: they do not require that any other than the president be called. Moreover, the Senate could adjourn at any time, terminating the proceedings and declining to take up the House articles. This is what happened in the trial of Andrew Johnson, in which the Senate voted on three articles and then adjourned without holding votes on the remaining eight.
This discussion does not engage in depth with all the parliamentary possibilities and intricacies. But it is sufficient to say for present purposes that, if the House of Representatives were to impeach the president, Senate Republicans would be in a position, if so inclined, to scuttle any trial and they should because what the Dems are attempting to do is to cover up for their leaders crimes. The Coup failed so now procedural methods are being tried.

Republicans have laid the groundwork for rejecting the legitimacy of a House impeachment. The president and his party’s leadership and supporters have repeatedly and vociferously characterized the strong Democratic criticisms of Trump as infected to the core by unremitting partisanship, personal hatred, anunrelenting refusal since Election Day to accept the result of the 2016 election andunlawful or unethical conduct by the Department of Justice, the FBI, the special counsel and the press. And whatever evidence eventually surfaces, Senate Republicans have already shrugged off the president’s appearance in a successful criminal prosecution as “Individual 1,” an allegedly active participant in a conspiracy to violate the campaign finance laws. As the debate over impeachment process plays out over 2019, and as the 2020 presidential campaign already underway intensifies, those advancing this case may argue for letting the voters decide.
All of this may seem academic in the extreme. The Mueller probe has already EXONERATED TRUMP. The Witch hunt was exhaustive in scope and attempt to undermine Trump..Mueller - the final tally:

675 days, 19 liberal lawyers, 40 FBI Agents, $50 million taxpayer  dollars, 28 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 500 + witnesses, 230 communication reports, 50 phone taps, 12 foreign government intelligent requests, There were Eight convictions on charges unrelated to the purpose of his investigation and unrelated to Trump or the Trump Campaign, a jailed attorney and 25 accused Russians laughing at the USA BUT NO COLLUSION. 
So..the  House has yet to even initiate an impeachment inquiry. Lets see if they dare take on WE THE PEOPLE THROUGH ANOTHER ILLEGAL MANEUVER.
IF THEY DO. DO NOT BE BYSTANDERS AGAIN! ITS TIME TO LOCK AND LOAD!


Posted by at 2 comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)