THE DONALD TRUMP CAMPAIGN MUST USE THE OLD FASHIONED METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED LEAFLETS TO REACH THE DISAFFECTED VOTER

 THE DONALD TRUMP CAMPAIGN MUST USE THE OLD FASHIONED METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED LEAFLETS TO REACH THE DISAFFECTED VOTER WHO DOES NOT TRADITIONALLY VOTE FOR THE REPUBLICANS AND EXPLAIN DONALD TRUMP'S POSITIONS.

The opposition is very good at it but they do not have the numbers we do. LETS MOBILIZE!!

 

LEAFLET CAMPAIGNS HAVE BEEN USED IN OUR COUNTRY IN THE PAST TO BYPASS THE BIASED MEDIA!
See pic below

 

ITS BEING DONE ALL AROUND THE WORLD..

Shown below are the facts about how people who vote get their information.  
The U.S. turnout in the 2012 presidential election which was 53.6%, based on 129.1 million votes cast and an estimated voting-age population of just under 241 million people.
I realize that on social media that we the “political preachers” are preaching to the political choir of our kind of people! Some choirs are bigger than others!
To win we have to start preaching in other people's churches ( metaphorical! ) The public square. Main Street America.
We have to use fliers and leaflets that are printed on copy machines across the country .. in offices we own or work at.. (so there is no extra cost to the Trump Campaign)
Then we must be bold and march out across the country and hand them out at flea markets, supermarkets, churches, colleges, train stations, subway stations, malls anywhere where cross sections of people move through or congregate!
We the Trump Army must be ready to mobilize in cities across the USA.. and change the minds of those who do not hear the real message.
WE MUST NEUTRALIZE THE LEFTIST PRO HILLARY MEDIA THAT IS TRYING TO CONTROL THE NARRATIVE.
WE ASK THE DONALD TRUMP CAMPAIGN TO JUST PROVIDE THE WEEKLY OR DAILY MESSAGE ON A ONE PAGE PDF SO WE CAN PRINT AND DISSEMINATE THE MESSAGE ACROSS AMERICA.
SHARE THIS CALL. I HAVE REACHED OUT TO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND SO SHOULD YOU!

********************************************************************************

About nine-in-ten Americans learn about the election in a given week, but they are divided over the most helpful type of source

By Jeffrey Gottfried, Michael Barthel, Elisa Shearer and Amy Mitchell

News and information about the contentious 2016 presidential election is permeating the American public, according to a new survey of 3,760 U.S. adults by Pew Research Center. About nine-in-ten U.S. adults (91%) learned about the election in the past week from at least one of 11 types of sources asked about, ranging from television to digital to radio to print.

This is true even among younger Americans, as 83% of 18- to 29-year-olds report learning about the presidential election from at least one stream of information, according to the survey conducted Jan. 12-27, 2016, using Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel.

This high level of learning about the 2016 presidential candidates and campaigns is consistent with recent research that has shown strong interest in this election, even more so than at the same point in the previous two presidential elections.¹

Americans are divided, though, in the type of sources they find most helpful for that news and information.

When asked if they got news and information about the election from 11 different source types, and then asked which they found most helpful, Americans were split: None of the source types asked about in the survey was deemed most helpful by more than a quarter of U.S. adults.

At the top of the list is cable news, named as most helpful by 24% of those who learned about the election in the past week. That is at least 10 percentage points higher than any other source type. Our past research indicates though, that the 24% is likely divided ideologically in the specific network they watch and trust.

After cable, five source types are named as most helpful by between 10% and 14% of those who got news about the election: Local TV and social networking sites, each at 14%, news websites and apps at 13%, news radio at 11% and national nightly network television news at 10%.

In the bottom tier are five source types named by no more than 3% of Americans who learned about the election. This includes print versions of both local and national newspapers, named by 3% and 2% respectively. It also includes late night comedy shows (3%) as well as the websites, apps or emails of the candidates or campaigns (1%) and of issue-based groups (2%).

As a platform, television and the Web – and even radio to a lesser degree – strongly appeal to certain parts of the public, while print sits squarely at the bottom. As many people name late night comedy shows as most helpful as do a print newspaper.

Age, education level and political party account for some of the differences here. Cable television’s overall popularity is pronounced among those who are 65 and older and also among Republicans, while social media is the clear favorite among the youngest age group, 18- to 29-year-olds.

About four-in-ten (43%) of those 65 or older who learned about the election in the past week say cable television news is most helpful, 26 percentage points higher than any other source type and much higher than any other age cohort. In fact, only 12% of 18- to 29-year-olds who learned about the election say that cable news is the most helpful.

Instead, about a third (35%) of 18- to 29-year-olds name a social networking site as their most helpful source type for learning about the presidential election in the past week. This is about twice that of the next nearest type – news websites and apps (18%), another digital stream of information. Social media drops off sharply for older age groups, with 15% of 30 to 49-year-olds, 5% of 50 to 64-year-olds, and just 1% of those 65 years and older saying the same. This is consistent with our previous research, which has shown that social media is the most prominent way that Millennials get political news, more so than any other generation.

The data also reveal the weight network television news and local TV news still carry among those 50 or older. Radio, though, shows consistent appeal across most age groups. Between 11% and 13% of those ages 18-29, 30-49 and 50-64 name radio as most helpful (a figure that falls to 5% among those 65+).

The area of difference that stands out most prominently along party lines is cable news. Republicans are almost twice as likely to say cable news is the most helpful than are Democrats (34% vs. 19%, and 24% among independents). Democrats are slightly more likely to name local TV news, but the gap is much smaller (18%, compared with 12% for both Republicans and independents).

Finally, those with a college degree are more likely than those with some college and those with a high school diploma or less to name radio, national papers in print, and news websites or apps as the most helpful type of source. Those who do not have a college degree are tied more closely to a preference for cable and local TV news.

Beyond what is most helpful, the majority of the public learns about the election from several types of sources

Even as U.S. adults find one type of source most helpful, the majority still get election news in a given week from multiple different source types. Indeed, of those who learned about the presidential election in the past week, just 9% learned from just one stream of information. In fact, almost half (45%) learned from five or more information streams.

Television sources again rise to the top. About three-quarters of U.S. adults (78%) learned about the election from at least one of the four TV-based source types asked about. Local TV and cable news reach the greatest percentages overall (57% and 54% respectively).

This was followed not by another traditional platform, but instead by digital. About two-thirds (65%) of U.S. adults learned about the 2016 election in the past week from digital source types, which includes social networking sites and news websites, as well as digital communication from issue-based groups and the candidates.

Coming in last: print versions of newspapers. Only about one-in-three (36%) U.S. adults learned about the campaign in the past week from either a local or national newspaper in print. The survey specifically asked about the print version of the paper and does not include the representation of newspapers in the digital space (48% of Americans got election news and information from news websites or apps in past week). This is an important distinction, as newspaper properties make up three of the top 10 digital news entities, according to comScore data compiled for our annual State of the News Media report. But it does speak to the precipitous decline of print as a mode of news – even as print-only consumers remain a key part of newspapers’ audiences.

In fact, more Americans cite radio as a source of election information in the past week (44%) than cite a print newspaper. And U.S. adults are roughly as likely to learn about the presidential election from an issue-based group’s website, app, or email (23%) or from late night comedy shows (25%) as from a national print newspaper (23%). And they are only slightly more likely to learn from their local print paper (29%).

While few Americans say issue-based groups or the campaigns themselves are most helpful, their presence as a direct source of information in the digital space comes through in these findings. At least two-in-ten U.S. adults learn about the presidential election directly from the websites, apps or emails of campaign and issue-based groups.

Level of usage differed notably by political party identification for late night comedy shows. They are a source for three-in-ten Democrats, but only 16% of Republicans and a quarter of independents. About a third of those ages 18-29 (34%) learned about the campaigns and candidates from late night comedy shows, higher than any other age group.

Another way to understand the dynamics of these different types of sources is by examining the portion of adults who learn from a type of source who also find that source most helpful. While local and cable TV news are cited at roughly the same rates overall, for example, cable news is far more likely to be named as the most helpful source. About four-in-ten (41%) U.S. adults who say they learned about the election from cable TV news in the past week name it as the most helpful type of source, while this is true of only 22% of those who got news about the presidential election from local TV. Local TV news, then, may be a common, but not crucial source for viewers. (This mirrors past findings that local TV news is the single most common source of political information in the U.S.)

Sharing about the election on social networking sites is much less common than getting news there

As we have seen in the past, getting news from social media is far more common than sharing news on social media. About half (51%) of social networking users learned about the presidential election from these sites. But only about one-in-five social networking users (18%) actually share election-related information on social media, whether by posting about it or by replying to or commenting on a post. That amounts to 15% of U.S. adults overall.

Those who learn from more source types are also more likely to share news and information, as are those for whom social media was most helpful for learning about the election. Almost three-in-ten of social media users who learn from 5 or more source types share something related to the presidential election on social media (29%), compared with no more than 12% of those who learned from fewer source types. And a third of those who name social media as their most helpful source (33%) share news and information about the election on these sites. Comparatively, this is true of only 20% of those who name cable news as their most helpful source type and a mere 8% who name local TV news.

Finally, while those with higher incomes are more likely to use social networking sites in general, it is lower income users who are more likely to share election-related content: About 20% of social networking users with household incomes under $75,000, compared with 14% of those with incomes of $75,000 or more.

Though it is common to learn about the election on at least one social networking site, Facebook is far and away the site where that is most likely to happen. This is not surprising, given that Facebook is the social networking site used by the most Americans, and is an increasingly common news destination, especially for Millennials. As we have seen before, there is also evidence that getting news from multiple social networking platforms is common: 41% of those who learn about the election on social media get election information from more than one social networking site.

Likely primary voters tend to have wider mix of source types

There are a number of ways that the election news habits of Americans who are most likely to participate in the upcoming presidential primaries and caucuses stand apart from those who are less likely to participate.

Overall, those who say they are very likely to participate in their state’s primary or caucus are more likely to learn about the election from multiple source types. Half of those who said they are very likely to participate learned from five or more source types, compared with 40% of those who are less likely to participate.

Within this mix of information streams, there are also differences between the two groups in the source types deemed most helpful. While cable ranks first among both groups, those who are very likely to participate show somewhat greater tendency to name both cable (27% vs. 22%) and radio (12% vs. 9%) as most helpful. Conversely, they have a lower tendency to name local TV news (10% vs. 17%) and social media (11% vs. 16%) as most helpful than those who are less likely to participate in their state’s primary or caucus.

Even though those who say they are very likely to participate in their state’s primary or caucus are less likely to name social media as their most helpful source type, they seem to be more engaged in that space: 21% share information about the election on social media, through original posts or replies to content posted by others, compared with 15% of those less likely to participate.

Obama and Kerry Kickbacks from Iran exposed!

                       ARE WE THE PEOPLE SO DUMB ??
                         ARE THE MEDIA SO CORRUPT
          IS THE CONGRESS SO CASTRATED AND INEPT ?
                  HAS OUR COUNTRY BEEN CO_OPTED ??

                         THE ANSWER IS YES!

CAN WE DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?? YES..!!
START BY GETTING DONALD TRUMP ELECTED.
HE IS A FIREWALL AT BEST!


Here is Another brick in the wall...
Obama is Stonewalling on Details of the $1.7 Billion in Iransom Payoffs. I KNOW WHY.. I THINK YOU KNOW WHY! BUT THE LEFTY PRESS AND THE FOOLS IN CONGRESS PRETENDS THEY DO NOT KNOW WHY!!
LET ME EXPOSE IT ONCE AND FOR ALL.. THE WORK IS "KICK BACKS!" THAT'S THE WAY IT WORKS IN ARAB COUNTRIES!
The structured transfers of $1.3 billion from a Treasury slush fund remain shrouded in mystery.
Confidentiality”? MY ASS!! BUT Yes, that’s the State Department’s story on why the Obama administration is stonewalling the American people regarding the president’s illegal and increasingly suspicious Iransom payoff. 

The administration refuses to divulge any further information about the $1.7 billion the president acknowledges paying the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. 

Grilled on Wednesday about how Obama managed to pay the final $1.3 billion installment — particularly given the president’s claim that it is not possible to send Tehran a check or wire-transfer — State Department spokesman Mark Toner decreed that the administration would continue “withholding this information” in order “to protect confidentiality.” Whose confidentiality? The mullahs’? That of the intermediaries the president used? Whose privacy takes precedence over our right to know how Obama funneled our money to our enemies? The closest thing to an answer we have to the latest round of questions comes courtesy of the perseverance of the investigative journalist Claudia Rosett. (You weren’t expecting the Republican Congress to be minding the purse, were you?) Recall that we have been asking about the $1.3 billion payment since the first revelations about this sordid affair. After all, if, as Obama and his toadies maintain, the payment is totally on the up and up — just a routine legal settlement involving Iran’s own money — then why won’t they answer basic questions about it? Why are such matters as the administration’s process in tapping a congressionally appropriated funding source for the settlement — a settlement Congress did not approve and seems to be in the dark about paying for — being treated as if they were state secrets so sensitive you’d need have a Clinton.mail account (or be a Russian hacker of a Clinton.mail account) to see them? 

Generally speaking, the State, Treasury, and Justice Departments cannot issue press releases fast enough to salute themselves over legal settlements that supposedly benefit taxpayers by billions of dollars — at least according to the same math that brought you all those Obamacare savings. How is it that, in what is purportedly a completely above-board legal case, we are not permitted to know how our own money was transferred to the jihadist plaintiff? With the administration taking the Fifth, it was left to Claudia to crawl through Leviathan’s catacombs. In her New York Sun report on Monday, we learned that she hit pay dirt: stumbling upon a bizarre string of 13 identical money transfers of $99,999,999.99 each — yes, all of them one cent less than $100 million — paid out of an obscure Treasury Department stash known as the “Judgment Fund.” The transfers were made — to whom, it is not said — on January 19, just two days after the administration announced it had reached the $1.7 billion settlement with Iran. They aggregate to just 13 cents shy of $1.3 billion, the same amount the State Department claims Iran was owed in “interest” from the $400 million that our government had been holding since the shah deposited it in a failed arms deal just prior to the Khomeini revolution. So, stacked atop of the pallets of $400 million in foreign cash that Obama arranged to shuttle from Geneva to Tehran as ransom (or, as the administration prefers, “leverage”) for the release of American hostages — via an unmarked cargo plane belonging to Iran Air, a terrorist arm of the mullahs’ terrorist coordinator, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps — we now have a second whopping money transfer that (a) violates federal criminal laws against providing things of value to Iran and (b) looks like it was conceived by Nicky Barnes. 

While “the most transparent administration in history” continues to insist that this transaction is completely legit, Claudia could not find the 13 transfers of $99,999,999.99 by searching for “Iran” listings in the judgment fund. Acknowledgment of payments to Iran is nowhere to be found. Instead, she happened upon this $1.3 billion (minus the 13 cents) by locating cases in which the State Department was a party. And with that, another intriguing wrinkle emerged: a 14th unexplained transfer by Treasury, on State’s behalf, in the amount of $10 million — bringing the total to $1.31 billion. How is it that, in what is purportedly a completely aboveboard legal case, we are not permitted to know how our own money was transferred to the jihadist plaintiff? 

Is that extra $10 million a sweetener for someone in this deal? Who knows . . . the administration won’t tell us. ;-) Ofcourse they wont.. WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK ITS FOR ?? OBAMA KERRY AND THE UNDERLINGS!! 

It won’t even confirm that the string of transfers was for Iran, though that appears undeniable: Not only does the amount fit; the administration has grudgingly conceded in response to inquiries from Representatives Ed Royce (R., Calif.) and Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) that it got the money to pay Iran from the judgment fund. You might think that members of Congress, the branch of government that is supposed to approve all spending by the federal government, would not have to ask where the executive branch got money to pay a government obligation. But in Obama’s eccentric interpretation of the Constitution, there are apparently special Iran clauses. So in this instance, lawmakers have to ask because this is not a bill they ever agreed to pay; and Obama had to try to sneak it by them because he knows that, had he asked for more piles of money — in addition to the tens of billions in sanctions relief — to bestow on an incorrigible jihadist enemy of the United States, Congress would have said “No.”
That’s where the judgment fund comes in. It would be better labeled the “slush fund.” As Claudia reports, Treasury portrays this fund as a “permanent, indefinite appropriation” available to pay legal judgments against federal agencies “where funds are not legally available to pay the award from the agency’s own appropriations.” Really? There is only one reason why funds would not be “legally available to pay . . . from an agency’s own appropriations”: namely, that Congress has not made an appropriation that gives the agency permission to pay the funds in question. In case you’re scoring, that is supposed to mean the agency does not pay. 

Could Congress appropriate a finite fund with respect to which it vests the executive branch with discretion to pay court judgments up to a certain amount without seeking legislative authorization? Sure it could. But a “permanent, indefinite appropriation”? No way. It is one thing to say a judgment fund should be “permanent” in the sense that litigation goes on every year and the government is bound to be on the losing end of some cases, so Congress should make an annual appropriation — just as it does for, say, FEMA, despite the absence of foreknowledge of what emergencies will arise. And it is one thing to say that particular pay-outs from this judgment fund are “indefinite” in the sense that Congress will not know when it passes the budget what specific judgment amounts will be during the coming year. But a fund cannot constitutionally be “permanent and indefinite” in the sense of being an all-purpose, limitless reservoir of money that empowers the president to pay anything to anyone simply by orchestrating a lawsuit and then “settling” it. 

The Constitution requires definite appropriations. That is a key limitation on executive power without which the Constitution would not have been adopted in the first place. And here, that’s not the half of it. Obama has not just orchestrated a king’s ransom — better, an ayatollah’s ransom — for the benefit of the Death to America regime in the absence of congressional authorization. He refuses to tell us how he transferred it to them. Why not a single transfer? Why structure it with 13 payments just under $100 million? And what is the other $10 million about? Is that related to this deal? 

Lets face it.. Obama and Kerry are crooks and they have got a secret Pay out. They do not want us to know .. Period...CAN WE DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?? YES..!!
START BY GETTING DONALD TRUMP ELECTED.
HE IS A FIREWALL AT BEST!

HERE ARE REASONS WHY HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD NOT BE ELECTED PRESIDENT.

44 Reasons to NOT Elect Hillary Clinton

Hillary sold her soul for power a long time ago. It’s no secret – and people are starting to realize it.

To elect Hillary Clinton

would be a foolish and dangerous mistake for America – not to mention the entire world. Hillary is currently in first place for the position of Democratic frontrunner. Those who know her lying, manipulative and psychopathic nature shudder at how much the New World Order agenda would be brought forward under her (mis)leadership. Hillary sold her soul for power a long, long time ago, and people are beginning to realize it. She’ll say anything to get elected. Here is a list of top 44 reasons to not elect Hillary Clinton. Even if some of these are ostensibly scandals of Bill, the pair still function as a close-knit criminal team, so they still serve as valid reasons not to elect Hillary:

1. Benghazi: Committing Perjury or Lying Under Oath

Hillary has repeatedly committed perjury or lied under oath throughout her career. One of the most telling examples was during her Benghazi testimony when she claimed a video had inspired a protest that ended up killing Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans. This was subsequently shown to be a lie. Hillary famously declared, “What difference does it make?” when the questioning got too tough, in regards to the causes of the American deaths and personnel she was supposedly in charge of protecting. She stated she had submitted all documents, but 20 months later, FOIA requests uncovered 41 new documents. Yet another lie.

2. Faking Uncontrollable Fits of Coughing

Check out this compilation of clips where Hillary pretends she can’t stop coughing in order to avoid answering tough questions or testify on an issue at all. On the Benghazi issue, Clinton testified 4 months late to Congress.

3. Email Gate: Illegally Mixing Government and Personal Emails

In the latest scandal over emails, dubbed Email Gate by some, Clinton set up a homebrew server to hold official Government property in terms of classified information. She also used her official Government work email to conduct private and personal business.

4. Email Gate: Endangering National Security and State Secrets

Another aspect of Email Gate was the reckless endangering of Governmental secrets Clinton engaged in. Although many readers of The Freedom Articles will be all too aware of the way Government abuses the concept of national security, the fact remains that there is some need for it. Numerous officials have stated there is no doubt – zero ambiguity – that her emails endangered national security, due to the fact many were classified SAP (Special Access Program). However, she may have been doing this deliberately (see point 6).

Hillary and 30,000 deleted emails. Image credit: Youngcons.com

5. Email Gate: Obstruction of Justice, Destruction of Evidence

Email Gate has many aspects to it. A further aspect is Hillary’s deliberate withholding (and deleting) of around 30,000 emails. Her excuse was that these were the personal, private ones, yet Congress had asked to see them all. Given what we know of Hillary as a cover up agent extraordinaire, what are the chances that she wasn’t deleting them to destroy information? It remains to be seen what will come of the deletion, since the FBI is reported to have the server and flash drives (with all the emails) in its possession.

6. Selling State Secrets to Foreign Countries

Mike Rivero (WhatReallyHappened.com) puts forth impressive evidence that Hillary has deliberately sold US Government State secrets to foreign countries. She and Bill did this with China during Bill’s presidency. Hillary may also have intentionally set up her homebrew server with weak security that could easily be hacked, so that the hackers could get the information and Hillary could claim the problem was “weak or flawed security” rather than a deliberately set up situation to leak data.

7. Bill the Rapist, Hillary the Coverup Agent

As I covered in the article Billary Clinton: Rapist and Coverup Team Par Excellence, Hillary has been covering up for Bill’s violent sexual escapades and rape for decades, threatening his female victims into silence, sometimes with death threats. Some of them have been outright killed.

8. Failed Stint as Secretary of State 2009-2013

A State Department spokesperson could not point to a single tangible achievement by Clinton. Hillary wasted $80 million on an Afghan US consulate. She lost $6 billion due to improper filing of contracts. She refused to classify Boko Haram as a terrorist group, leading to the kidnapping of 300 school girls. She called off internal investigations into her State Department involving the endemic engagement of prostitutes by her security, drug use by State Department contractors and the US Ambassador to Belgium soliciting male child prostitutes.

9. A Giant Whopper: Pretending to be Under Fire in Bosnia

Hillary claimed she was under attack by snipers when she landed in Tuzla, Bosnia, 1996, but subsequent CBS footage showed her walking calmly along the tarmac there and even stopping to greet a young girl. Liar, liar, pants on fire.

10. Flip-Flopping: NAFTA

This video (also embedded above) shows how Hillary has flip-flopped on the issue of NAFTA, saying to some people that she favored it (“NAFTA has proven its worth”) while saying to others she opposed it (“I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning”). Anything to get elected!

11. More Lies: Gun or No Gun?

In the same video, Hillary claimed her grandfather taught her to shoot, yet later on, claimed she grew up in a house without any guns. Which is it?

12. More Lies: Bringing Peace to Northern Ireland?

Hillary claimed she brought Protestants and Catholics together in a Town Hall meeting for the first time. However, as this video states, “negotiators from the parties that helped broker the Good Friday agreement in 1998 told the Daily Telegraph that her role was peripheral and that she played no part in the grueling political talks over the years.”

13. Flip-Flopping: Marriage Equality

Hillary has variously claimed that she opposes gay marriage and supports gay marriage at different times. It’s all about opportunism and pandering to a political base.

14. Hillary during Watergate Investigations: An “Unethical, Dishonest Lawyer”

Bill Clinton was asked to serve on the special staff to handle the Nixon impeachment inquiry. He declined and suggested they hire his girlfriend Hillary Rodham instead. As Mike Rivero writes:

“Hillary Clinton was later fired from the staff of the House Judiciary committee investigating the Watergate scandal in 1974. She was fired by her supervisor, lifelong Democrat Jerry Zeifman, who stated, “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer,” he said. “She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” Zeifman refused to give Clinton a letter of recommendation, one of only three employees he refused during his entire career.”

What will it take for the American people to not elect Hillary?

15. Blood Gate: Selling AIDS-Infected Blood

When Bill Clinton became Governor of Arkansas, he awarded a fat contract to a Little Rock company called Health Management Associates (HMA). The company was paid $3 million a year for “medical services” for the state’s prison system. The game was to pay prisoners for their blood ($7 per pint) then resell it at massive profits on the international plasma market ($50 a pint). HMA’s entry into the blood market coincided with the rise of AIDS in America, but HMA did not screen the prisoners’ blood, even after the FDA issued special alerts about the higher incidents of AIDS and hepatitis in prison populations. In Canada alone, more than 7,000 people died from contaminated blood transfusions, many of them hemophiliacs. More than 4,000 of them died of AIDS. In 1986, public outrage forced the cancellation of HMA’s contract.

16. Whitewater Scandal

The Whitewater Scandal involved Bill using the power of office of Governor of Arkansas to build public roads to the Clintons’ private land. The Clintons and McDougals made money with real estate contracts for Whitewater property that included harsh clauses. This resulted in elderly buyers defaulting on land payments and repossessions. The habit of using State power to personally enrich themselves is a very common theme running through the Clintons’ careers.
Hillary was the first woman ever subpoenaed by a Grand Jury in relation to Whitewater. Pervasive conflicts of interest were discovered between Rose Law Firm (Hillary) and Madison Guaranty (McDougal). Billing records disappeared (presumed stolen) from Vince Foster’s office the night he died. They reappeared in the Clinton residence following their acquittal, covered with Hillary’s fingerprints. Susan McDougal refused to testify against the Clintons, so went to prison, but was pardoned by President Bill. 15 Clinton friends were found guilty of 40 federal crimes. This cost US taxpayers around $145 million.

17. Cattle Gate: Insider Trading – Hillary’s Magical Trade

Hillary invested $1000 and turned it into $100,000 through insider trading. She entered and exited the market at the exact right time. According to economists at Auburn and Nth Florida University, 1995, who concluded in their study in the Journal of Economics and Statistics, the probability of Hillary’s trade being genuine and not an insider trade was 1 in 250,000,000! The broker involved was given a 3 year suspension.
The trade was connected to Tyson Foods, the largest employer in Arkansas and a big Clinton donor.

18. Eliminating Drug Testing at the White House

In an effort, no doubt, to avoid embarrassment over Bill’s cocaine-snorting habits, the Clintons eliminated random drug testing at the White House through the appointment Patsy Thomasson.

19. File Gate: The Clintons’ Enemy List

The Clinton Administration improperly requested and received FBI background reports on 900 Republican officials in 1996. These FBI files contained sensitive information on average American citizens. It turned into a “Compilations of Enemies” list. Hillary was the source of the requests. The NYT called Hillary a “congenital liar”. Congressman Bob Barr commented:

“Clearly what the Clinton Administration is trying to do is an orchestrated systematic effort to thwart justice, to thwart the rule of law, to thwart legitimate investigations by the Congress, whether it is impeachment proceedings or regular oversight … to derail investigations (and) derail prosecutions.”

20. China Gate: The China Connection

Bill Clinton and Al Gore took money from rich Chinese donors who ran prostitution rings. Again in 1996, agents of the Chinese Government and military funneled money into the Clinton re-election campaign, Clinton Legal Defense Fund and Democratic National Committee, in violation of US law.

21. Prison Population Explosion under Bill

The total prison population increased by 673,000 people under Clinton’s tenure or by 235,000 more than it did under President Ronald Reagan, according to a study by the Justice Policy Institute.

22. Supporting Human Rights Abuse in Colombia

The Clintons also have ties to human rights abuses in Colombia.

23. Clinton Foundation Corruption

The Clintons have used their foundation as a vehicle to accept foreign money to fund Hillary’s presidential campaign – which is illegal. You can read more here about the incredible corruption of the Clinton Foundation. The New York Times referred to the organization as having “moral and fiscal chaos, shameless fundraising” and being “mired in conflicts of interest”. Hillary travelled to Moscow and pressured Russia to buy jets from Boeing. Then, 2 months later, contract in hand, Boeing donated $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Foreign donations to the Foundation increased by 70% when Hillary ran in 2008.

24. Destroying and Profiting Off Haiti

Bill and Hillary have made money off Haiti too. Their Clinton Foundation took in billions, yet Haiti is still devastated. As this Washington Post article states:

““(The people here) think he’s (Bill’s) here making money,” said Leslie Voltaire, a former government official who worked with Clinton on post-earthquake reconstruction. “There is a lot of resentment about Clinton here. People have not seen results. . . . They say that Clinton used Haiti.””

25. Accepting Bribes Gifts from Foreign Nations

Hillary Clinton plays the politics game – you want influence, you pay her and Bill. Look at all the lavish gifts she has received – gold necklaces from Saudi Arabia worth $500,000, plus other gifts from 3 other nations in the Middle East.

26. Hillary’s Doesn’t Care About Women

This leads us to the next point – how does Hillary expect to convince women voters she cares about women, while she accepts gifts from nations like Saudi Arabia, with horrendous abuses against women?

27. Soul For Sale to the Highest Bidder: Hillary’s Massive Bribes “Speaking Fees” from Big NWO Banks

Hillary Clinton is the bankers’ candidate, hands down. While Bernie Sanders, a man of principle, has refused money from the banks, Hillary has dollars galore from the big banks. According to the Daily Wire, the Clintons have made more than $160 MILLION in speaking fees since Bill left the White House. That’s effectively bribery – as thanks for previous gifts and as thanks for things to come. Listen to Hillary’s absurd explanation of why she deserves $250,000 for a single speech to Goldman Sachs. Wake up America!
At the time of writing, 4 of her top 5 donors were Big Banks:

Corporation	Total	Individuals	PACs
Citigroup Inc	$824,402	$816,402	$8,000
Goldman Sachs	$760,740	$750,740	$10,000
DLA Piper	$700,530	$673,530	$27,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co	$696,456	$693,456	$3,000
Morgan Stanley	$636,564	$631,564	$5,000

28. Witches’ Covens

Former Clinton Larry Nichols has attested to how Hillary would use taxpayer Government money, when Bill was Governor of Arkansas, to fly out to California to attend a monthly witch’s coven in California. In and of itself, that is not necessarily bad, but given the elite obsession with Satanism and black magic, and the propensity of the elite to engage in dark rituals inside of secret societies like the Bohemian Club, this is another red flag if you’re wanting to elect Hillary.
Years ago David Icke pointed out that Hillary was higher up than Bill in the Illuminati hierarchy. If this is true, perhaps Hillary’s activities as a witch are related to this …

29. Zionist Stooge: Israel First

Like almost every US politician who aspires to become President, Hillary has gone on the record praising Israel’s virtues to the Heavens. Her main backer is arch-Zionist Haim Saban. You can read more about how she puts Israel first here.

30. Puppet: Taking Orders from the CFR

Hillary admitted on video that she takes orders from the Rockefeller CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), one of the key Round Table groups running the New World Order.

31. Cold-Heartedness: Laughing at How Gaddafi was Assassinated

Look at the way Hillary laughed in delight at how the US murdered Gaddafi, who had elevated Libya to the highest standard of living among all the African nations. This was an outright assassination and murder of a sovereign foreign leader, yet Hillary cackled “We came, we saw, he died”.

32. Warmongering: Workin’ Real Hard to Start a War with Iran

Look at Hillary cackling again at the thought of starting war with Iran.

33. Hillary Care

Bill put Hillary in charge of healthcare. Hillary admitted at the time, “I’m not an expert on healthcare.” She kept the Presidential Task Force on National Health Care Reform shrouded in secrecy. Hillary Care was rejected by many. It cost taxpayers $32 million. Hillary and others were ultimately fined $450,000, and the court costs to US taxpayers was $725,000.

34. Travel Gate

When Bill came to power in 1993, the Clintons fired the White House Travel Office, which had served 7 presidents. Their installed their wealthy Hollywood friends to take over the travel business worth $31 million annually. Hillary was at the center of 5 investigations (DOJ, FBI, GOA, Oversight Committee, Whitewater Independent Counsel) for these actions. She claimed the firings were due to employee misconduct, but the employees were cleared of all charges. The Clintons were forced to reinstate all of them.

35. Clinton Legal Defense Fund

The Clintons have been in so much legal trouble for their crimes over the years that they established a Clinton Legal Defense Fund. The point was that individuals or companies hoping to garner favor with the Clintons could help pay the Clinton’s endless legal bills.

36. IRS abuses

The Clintons used the IRS to harass enemies (just as Obama did later) including Republicans, the White House Travel Office, the NRA, Judicial Watch, the Heritage Foundation and other conservative organizations. A senior IRS official admitted that Clinton opponents were singled out for audits. Also audited were Bill Clinton’s female accusers (i.e. mostly rape victims) including Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick and Elizabeth Ward Gracen.

Do not elect Hillary, unless you want more tyranny. Love those eyes! Medusa herself couldn’t do a better death stare …

37. Pardon Gate

Just before leaving office, Bill Clinton pardoned 450 people for crimes ranging from kidnapping to terrorism to cocaine smuggling. Several pardons personally benefited Hillary Clinton and were investigated for direct ties to her NY senate bid. One person on this list was Marc Rich, a billionaire fugitive. His ex-wife Denise Rich funneled millions into Clinton funds. Former President Carter called this list “shameless” and “disgraceful”.
Hillary was intimately with many of these presidential pardons. She met with “New Square Four”, a Jewish group who had defrauded the Government of millions, and got their votes in exchange for pardons. Two criminals (Carlos Vignali and Almon Braswell) paid Hillary’s brother Hugh Rodham high fees to obtain the pardons. She also met with FALN (Fuerzas Armadas de Liberation Nacional, or in English “Armed Forces of National Liberation”), a group that exploded bombs in NYC and Chicago. Hillary also cut a deal with them to get votes for pardons. Congress requested additional information on all this, but Bill claimed Executive Privilege, preventing anyone involved from testifying.

38. State-Reared Children: Hillary’s Book It Takes a Village

Did you know Hillary has called for the State to rear children? Hillary’s 1996 book, It Takes a Village generated poor sales, perhaps because it called for Government to replace parents in the raising of children. That’s not socialism, that’s communism, but regardless of the “ism” you use to describe it, it’s a leaf straight out of the eugenics book. Alders Huxley warned in Brave New World of the NWO plan to have State hatcheries where the Government strictly controlled reproduction. It can also be found in various key conspiracy documents.

39. Reporting Violation: 2000 Hillary New York Senate Election Campaign

This was the largest election fraud in US history. In July 2000, Hillary was recorded calling and thanking felon Peter Paul for organizing a gala event. She said it cost $500,000 instead of $1.5 million. Hillary was fined $50,000 for intentional under-reporting.

40. Broken Ethical Code: Hillary’s New York Senate Term

Hillary helped secure millions in federal assistance for a New York developer who donated $120,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary was investigated by the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, and was found to have broke the Senate Code of Conduct. What a surprise!

41. Fraud: 2008 Hillary Presidential Election Campaign

More fraud. Jeffrey Thompson and other fundraising “bundlers” for Hillary pled guilty to conspiracy and campaign fund law violations.

42. More Illegal Funding: Donor Victor Pinchuk

Victor Pinchuk, reportedly the 4th richest man in Ukraine, channeled money through the Clinton Foundation ($8.3 million) and in doing so violated US law by overriding sanctions on Iran. Hillary, head of the State Department at the time, the branch of the Government responsible for enforcing these sanctions, refused to charge Pinchuk, who coincidentally happened to promise the Clinton Foundation millions more.

43. Using Mind Controlled Sex Slaves? Cathy O’Brien, Rape Victim of Hillary

Cathy O’Brien, a former mind control victim who suffered horrific SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse), was programmed her to become a sex slave. Her book Trance-Formation of America details what she underwent. She explicitly mentions being abused and repeatedly raped by many high-ranking politicians including George Bush Sr., Dick Cheney, Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton.

44. Serial Murder: The Clinton Body Count

The Clinton body count is a very long one, stretching back decades to their days in Arkansas. It is full of suicides, car accidents, plane crashes, explosions, people dying of gun shot wounds to the back of the head and people dying from falling out of high apartment buildings. Since the overwhelming majority were officially ruled as suicide, the Clintons enjoy plausible deniability, which the elite regularly use as a legal shield behind which to hide their horrendous crimes. Here is what Gary Aldrich, who worked in the White House as a FBI agent, had to say about it:

“My name would be mud, my FBI career would be over, and I might even be in danger, if the stories coming from Little Rock were true – about how so many enemies of the Clintons ended up having fatal accidents.”

Here is a partial list of those who knew or were close to the Clintons:
July 1978: Susan Coleman is shot in the back of the head after allegedly becoming pregnant to Bill Clinton. Verdict: “suicide”.
August 1991: Danny Cassolaro is found dead in bathtub after investigating corruption including the Clintons. Verdict: “suicide”.
July 1992: C. Victor Raiser II (and son Montgomery) die in a plane crash/explosion, and Herschel Friday dies in a separate plane crash/explosion, both deemed “accidents”.
September 1992: Paul Tulley dies to unknown causes.
December 1992: Paula Gober, speechwriter for Clinton, dies in a car accident.
December 1992: Jim Wilhite dies in a skiing accident.
January 1993: Ed Cauley, former Clinton Arkansa campaign manger, dies.
May 1993: John Wilson, former DC city councilman with inside knowledge of Whitewater, is found hanged in his room. Verdict: “suicide”.
July 1993: Paul Wilcher, an attorney, wrote a 105 page letter to then attorney general Janet Reno, describing knowledge of the Mena, Arkansas gun-running and drug-dealing activity. He is found dead in his apartment. The coroner did not rule on the cause of death.
July 1993: Vince Foster, who knows Rose Law Firm (Hillary’s old law firm) and the Clintons’ financial secrets very well, dies under highly mysterious circumstances. The day before, on 7/14/93, Bill fired FBI chief William Sessions out of the blue. Assistant Attorney General Webster Hubbell on July 20th, 1993, concludes: “Don’t believe a word you hear. It was not suicide. It couldn’t have been …”
July 1993: Jerry Parks, who collected a dossier of photos on Bill Clinton, as ordered by Vince Foster. Foster was ordering Parks to conduct surveillance on Bill, allegedly for Hillary, to see how vulnerable her husband would be if he ran for President. Foster gave files to Hillary. 2 days later Foster was dead. Later Parks is shot and the files are allegedly taken from his home.
August 1993: Jon Walker, a senior investigator for the Resolution Trust Corporation, looking for source of a suspicious $50 million transfer related to $40 million embezzlement scheme involving Whitewater and the Clintons, falls to his death from a high apartment building. Verdict: “suicide”.
September 1993: Dr. Stanley Heard and Attorney Steve Dickson, family doctor for the Clintons, are killed in 2 plane crashes.
November 1993: Sexual harassment victim Kathleen Willey’s second husband, Edward E. Willey Jr., commits “suicide” on November 29, 1993, the day Kathleen claimed Clinton’s sexual misconduct against her took place.
March 1994: Dr. Donald Rogers, family dentist of the Clintons, is killed in plane crash, ruled an “accident”.
May 1994: Gandy Baugh, attorney, commits “suicide” by jumping out of an apartment building.
June 1994: Stanley Huggins, a partner in Memphis law firm investigating the Madison loan, is found dead of viral pneumonia.
July 1994: Calvin Walraven dies of a gun wound to head. Verdict: “suicide”.
October 1994: Florence Martin, who had the PIN to bank account of $1.46 million set up for Barry Seal, is found dead of gun shot wounds to the head.
April 1996: Department of Commerce worker Ron Brown dies in a plane crash, after voicing displeasure at Clinton’s White House perverting point of energy swaps. Nico Josic was the ground investigator and was shot to death. It was ruled a suicide before he could be questioned.
November 1996: Barbara Wise, worker at the Department of Commerce, is found dead.
July 1997: Mary Caitrin Mahoney, a former White House intern, is found shot at Starbucks. The store is not robbed.
March 1998: Johnny Franklin Lawhon, who found cashier’s check to Clinton in car worth $27,000, later died mysteriously.

Conclusion: Do Not Elect Hillary! Share the Truth Far and Wide

If you know anyone who is still considering voting to elect Hillary in 2016, please share this with them. The truth has to be told and known. If people know even a portion of this, they will not elect Hillary. This isn’t about Left or Right. This about tyranny and freedom, deception and truthhood, criminality and justice. The population in general has a very short-term memory; it’s time to remind people of the utter depravity and ruthless criminality of the Clintons so they do not get re-elected and the Clinton body count does not continue to rise in 2017 and beyond.

JOHN GAULTIER'S FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE BULLETIN: Huma Abedin will be Hillary Clinton's Chief of Sta...

JOHN GAULTIER'S FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE BULLETIN: Huma Abedin will be Hillary Clinton's Chief of Sta...: THIS WOMAN COULD BE HILLARY CLINTON'S CHIEF OF STAFF IF CLINTON IS ELECTED!! Huma Abedin -- wife of Anthony Weiner and deputy ...

Huma Abedin will be Hillary Clinton's Chief of Staff with access to State Secrets. God Help Us if we allow that to happen.

THIS WOMAN COULD BE HILLARY CLINTON'S CHIEF OF STAFF IF CLINTON IS ELECTED!!

ASK YOURSELF AND YOUR FRIENDS .. ....WHO IS MORE DANGEROUS.. AN ISLAMIC MOLE LIKE ABEDIN.. OR TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN CEO STEVE BANNON? C'MON.. REALLY!! THE LEFTY MEDIA IS PLAYING YOU FOR A FOOL!

Huma Abedin -- wife of Anthony Weiner and deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton -- is a Muslim Mole... her mother was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood! That is a fact. 

Huma Abedin is to Hillary Clinton what Valerie Jarret is to Obama. Hillary is already being given security briefings and Huma is undoubtedly passing this information on to her Islamic Controllers. If the Islamic Enemy knew our secrets when Hillary was Secretary of State... just imagine the disaster  it will be if Huma Abedin has access to National Security information any time she is asked to provide it! 
 

The lefty Western media purposely hid what has been revealed in several Arab newspapers and left it an open secret in American government circles, particularly in the State Department where the Islamic Influence has completely taken over all sense of requirement of National Security of the United States.

Al-Liwa Al-Arabi (translated here) claims to have leaked an extensive list, partially published by Al-Jazeera and several other major Arab newspapers, that includes Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin, in the Brotherhood’s secret women's division -- known as the Muslim Sisterhood or International Women's Organization (IWO).

Information about the IWO can readily be found at the Muslim Brotherhood's official website. An excerpt from its goal, translated from the Arabic, states:

The Women Organization's goal, in accordance with the Muslim Brotherhood rules, is to gain and acquire a unified global perception in every nation in the world regarding the position of women, and the necessity of advocacy work at all levels in accordance with the message of the Brotherhood, as written in Women in Muslim Society, and the rearing of women throughout the different stages of life [emphasis added].

The Egyptian paper Al-Dostor revealed that the Sisterhood includes 63 international members across 16 different countries -- a claim confirmed by the Arab Center for Studies, headed by researcher Abdul Rahim Ali.

Neither Huma nor any major Western media outlets even mention this bit of common knowledge in the Arab world.

But there is more. Also confirmed by Arab sources is that Huma Abedin has a brother who works at Oxford University named Hassan Abedin. Oxford, which has long been infiltrated by Islamists who founded the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), has Huma's brother listed as a fellow and partner with a number of Muslim Brotherhood members on the Board -- including al-Qaeda associate Omar Naseef and the notorious Muslim Brotherhood leader Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi. Both have been listed as OCIS trustees. Naseef continues to serve as Board chairman.

In 2009, Qaradawi's role within Oxford and the Muslim Brotherhood was championed by the notorious Sheikh Rached Ghannouchi of Al-Nahda – a Muslim Brotherhood affiliate now active in Tunisia. OCIS has even presented an award for great scholarly achievement to Brotherhood member Shaykh Abd Al-Fattah Abu Gudda, whose personal history goes back to the Brotherhood's founder, Hasan al-Banna.

Even the Sunday Times acknowledges that the cradle of Islamic jihad -- Al-Azhar University -- actively attempts to establish links with OCIS, where Huma's brother serves.

Was Huma unaware of all this as she accompanied Hillary Clinton to the Dar El-Hekma women's college in Saudi Arabia? Huma's mother is co-founder and vice dean at the college and an active missionary on issues regarding Muslim women.

Another member listed as belonging to the Sisterhood mentioned by Al-Jazeera is Suheir Qureshi. Alongside Huma's mother, Saleha Abedin, as well as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was brought in due to her connection with Huma, Qureshi spoke on issues of women in Muslim society. An Arabic news report of what happened during Hillary's visit stated that:

Suheir Qureshi spoke of how elated she was of Hillary's historic visit.... Saleha Abedin spoke after Suheir Qureshi and beamed in the presence of Secretary Clinton. Saleha's speech preceded the former first lady's. Then Hillary stood. She donned a broad smile as she approached the podium....Clinton started with a strong word and she spent a long time complimenting Dr. Saleha Abedin regarding her daughter. Hillary explained that Huma holds an important and sensitive position in her office. She ended her speech by speaking of Saleha Abedin's daughter (Huma), that a person must be happy if mentioned in a positive light but there is no happiness that equals the compliment given to children in front of a parent [emphasis added].

It is sacrilege in Islam for Huma's mother to accept the reality that her daughter is married to a Jew. Yet neither Saleha nor Huma's brother Hassan denounces her marriage to Weiner, especially when it was considered null and void by some of the highest authorities on Islamic Sharia rulings.

 

Influence: The Muslim Brotherhood in America and Huma Abedin's Role

8 Things to Know About Huma Abedin’s Involvement with an Islamist Journal

At the very least, these connections should raise some red flags.

from Kyle Shideler · @ShidelerK |

Following a New York Post article, which released new and revealing snippets from the pages of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, a 2012 controversy about the nature of Huma Abedin’s associations, has again kicked into high gear. While some in the media have attempted to defend Abedin, and the journal, they’ve played fast and loose with the facts.

About the Author

Kyle Shideler

Kyle Shideler is the Director of the Threat Information Office at the Center for Security Policy.

@ShidelerK 
 

At the heart of the matter is Abedin’s involvement with an organization founded by a man named Abdullah Omar Naseef, a Saudi official who spent decades involved with organizations which would go on to be designated for engaging in terror finance.
Here’s what you need to know:

1. Huma Abedin and terror-funder Abdullah Omar Naseef are directly connected.

This isn’t six degrees of Kevin Bacon. Huma Abedin served as the associate editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs for 12 years from 1996-2008, and appeared on the masthead of the organization’s journal right up until the time she began to work at the State Department for Hillary Clinton. This included the time she was working as an intern for Hillary Clinton at the White House.  Nassef held the position of Chairman of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs. Huma Abedin and Naseef overlapped at IMMA for a period of seven years. As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy noted, “the journal was the IMMA’s raison d’etre.”

2. The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs was the Abedin family business.

Syed Abedin, Huma’s father, founded the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs with Abdullah Omar Naseef in the 1970s. The Abedin patriarch was the editor, until passing away after which time Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin took over the journal and held the same position, and still does to this day. Abedin’s brother and sister have also all held positions with the IMMA.

3. The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs promotes views on Sharia, Islam and a Muslim’s role in the West popularized by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Editions of the journal openly endorsed the positions of known Muslim Brotherhood theoreticians, including Sayyid Qutb, and called for the imposition of sharia law among Muslim minorities residing in the West. “Muslim minority affairs” primarily refers to questions of the Fiqh (jurisprudence) of Minorities, the area of Sharia law jurisprudence concerned with the role and status of Muslims who have immigrated to non-Muslim states, popularized by Muslim Brotherhood thinker Yusuf Al Qaradawi. Qaradawi is best known for his fatwas supporting Hamas suicide bombing and attacks on Americans in Iraq during the 2003 Iraq War.

4. The Journal’s benefactor, Abdullah Omar Naseef, served as Secretary General of the World Muslim League.

The controversy about Naseef stems from his role with the Muslim World League. Naseef held the position of Secretary General of MWL for a decade, from 1983-1993. The purpose of the Muslim World was to support efforts to proselytize Islam in the West. The organization combined Saudi funds with the intellectual efforts of Muslim Brotherhood thinkers including Said Ramadan and Taha Jaber Alwani who served as founding members.

Read Next

Sharia

What's Wrong with These Four Approaches to "Deprogramming" Jihad?

You have to look past what you wish were true.

BY CounterJihad

5. The Muslim World League was specifically mentioned as a funding source by Osama Bin Laden.

The Muslim World League was specifically mentioned by Osama bin Laden as a source of funding and after 9/11 the Muslim World League offices in Herdon, VA were raided by law enforcement.  A Muslim World League subsidiary, the International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO), would have two of its branches named as specially designated global terrorist entities.

6. Abdullah Omar Naseef created another organization, the Rabita Trust, which was also shut down for terrorism.

Another WML subsidiary founded by Nassef, the Rabita Trust, is also a specially designated global terrorist entity according to the U.S. Treasury Department. Nassef also appointed Rabita Trust Director General Wael Hamza Julaidan, a close associate of Osama Bin Laden. The U.S. Treasury department would eventually designate Julaidan as a specially designated global terrorist.

7. In addition to Al Qaeda finance connections, Naseef also worked for a group of Hamas financiers. So did Huma’s mom.

In addition to his Muslim World League ties, Naseef also held a position as an officer with the International Islamic Council for Daw’a and Relief, a position he shared with Abedin’s mother Saleha. The IICDR is a member of the Hamas finance coalition known as the Union of the Good, which the U.S. government considers a specially designated global terrorist entity.  Yusuf al Qaradawi, a preeminent Muslim Brotherhood jurist, runs the Union of the Good.

8. Huma’s mom ran a women’s organization dedicated to supporting Sharia law in place of women’s rights.

Saleha Abedin’s position at the International Islamic Council for Daw’a and Relief was to run the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC). The IICWC is a group which advocates for sharia law provisions of family law and seeks the repeal of Egypt’s Mubarak-era prohibitions on female genital mutilation, child marriage, and marital rape. For the IICWC’s positions on matters of sharia jurisprudence the Committee turned to Hamas supporting Muslim Brotherhood cleric Yusuf Al Qaradawi.

WARNING. HILLARY CLINTON...WILL WEAR A SECRET HEARING DEVICE DURING DEBATE... SCRAMBLE THE SOUND !!

WARNING TO DONALD TRUMP & CAMPAIGN.

HILLARY CLINTON...WILL WEAR A SECRET HEARING DEVICE DURING DEBATE...

JUST LIKE HUSSEIN OBAMA DID DURING THE 2012 DEBATES.

SHE WILL HAVE HER EARS COVERED BY HER HAIR SO NO ONE WILL SEE IT!

UPDATE September 18 2016
The Media Lackeys are running scared that the Hillary Plan has been busted.

Fecesbook (Facebook) Just Blocked Joe Biggs for putting up a FARCE on Facebook on the Earpiece Story!


 




Update: September 9 2016
TOLD YOU SO!!

  MORE EVIDENCE!
Wikileaks Email Shows Huma Abedin In Charge of Hillary’s Earpiece

‘Crooked’ Hillary Clinton was seen wearing an ear piece in Wednesday night’s Commander in Chief Forum hosted by NBC and MSNBC.  This was the first event where both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were invited to attend together.  Each candidate received a short period with host Matt Lauer.  It was expected that both candidates would provide unaided answers to the questions asked but it appears Hillary did not.
POTUS TRUMP (not the real Donald Trump account) tweeted after the event their disdain for candidate Clinton using the ear piece which provided her a boost in answering questions.

Now this…
Wikileaks released a Hillary Clinton email discussing Hillary’s earpiece.
Apparently, Huma had earpiece duty.

Actor James Woods tweeted this yesterday.

pic.twitter.com/T3gpMPelJl

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 8, 2016

She has used them in the past.. see pictures below.. she is not picking her ear!!

 

 

 The Trump Campaign should use a scrambling device that send distorted signals into her ear sending Hillary Clinton into an epileptic fit on stage. WONT THAT BE SOME FUNNY SHIT!!

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A HEARING DEVICE USED BY STUDENTS TO CHEAT ON EXAMS

ITS NOT SECRET THAT THIS TECHNOLOGY IS AVAILABLE!!

Teenagers may be using James Bond-style hidden earpieces to cheat in their exams, according to the Government's testing watchdog.

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority is investigating concerns that students could be using the devices linked to mobile phones or MP3 players.

A Canadian company is openly promoting the invisible, wireless "micro spy earphone" to exam candidates around the world, The Times Educational Supplement reported.

The Toronto-based company, Examear, uses the advertising slogan: "Helping students succeed. Worldwide!"

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-475995/Invisible-earpieces-help-student-cheat-exams.html#ixzz4Hp883SuH

It’s not a secret that Obama uses ear pieces, because there are numerous photos that show him wearing one at various functions, as you see in the photos below:

Obama adjusts ear piece in photos above
“Gate” posted this close-up photo of Obama (see below) which clearly shows him wearing a clear-colored ear device (a Bluetooth® or  higher-end Kleer® wireless earbud?). However, this photo could not be from the third (or second or first) debate because Obama has jet-black hair in the photo, whereas his hair has grey in it during the three debates:

Pic posted by “Gate”

So I took screen shots from the videos posted on YouTube of the third and first debates, so we can see for ourselves.
Here’s a screen shot from the first debate, followed by a close-up of Obama’s left ear from this screen shot:

Here’s a screen shot I took from a video of the third presidential debate, followed by a closeup of Obama’s left ear from that screen shot:

I painted two red arrows onto the above closeup, pointing to two features that are missing from Obama’s left ear in the first debate:

• The left red arrow points to a strange flesh-colored vertical line that extends from the inner top rim to the lower lobe of Obama’s ear.
• The right red arrow points to a crescent shape in his ear that’s a light flesh-pink color.

I found the same two features in other screenshots of Obama which I took from the video of the third debate.
Here are the closeups of the two ears (left from the 1st debate; right from the 3rd debate) placed side by side so you can better compare them. I’ve painted red dots on that strange flesh-colored vertical line in the picture of his ear from the 3rd debate:

Here are the first pic posted by “Gate” showing clearly a clear-colored ear device in Obama ear (left), side by side with the closeup of his ear from the third debate (right). Do you see how the pink crescent shape is EXACTLY the same U shape as the clear ear device?


Now watch this video of the third presidential debate. Notice, for example beginning at the 0:02:40 mark, how when Romney’s talking, Obama is very still and just stares at Romney, as if he’s intently listening to someone talking into his ear:

This is what Mark McGrew wrote in an email to me:
“I’m sure there are clear ear pieces. But in a clandestine application they would be flesh colored and used with makeup to blend in which is what Obama’s ear looked like in the 3rd debate.
Blue Phone: This is a technique used by sales managers to train new salespeople, who know little about sales methods or their written script (sales pitch). A manager listens in to a call between a salesman and his customer. The customer can not hear the manager. The call is recorded so that the salesman can listen to it later, over and over again, until he understands what to do when he is on his own. The salesman’s only purpose in life, is to watch and listen to every word and every inflection of the manager and the salesman has to duplicate, like an actor, every thing the manager says, in the same tone of voice, the same inflections and the same body motions. The salesman becomes like a Disneyland robot, completely mimicking the manager in every way. In reality, the manger is negotiating with the customer, but using the salesman’s body to do so. The salesman is ‘possessed’. If done properly, the manager at some point can say, ‘I shot John Kennedy and raped your daughter’ and that is exactly what the salesman will tell the customer, and not even know he said it. After the call, the manager can tell the salesman what he said, but the salesman will not believe it until he hears the recording of the call. The salesman is hypnotized during the blue phoning. The manager has complete control over his robot. This technique is used in complicated sales, with many questions coming from the customer, such as securities and investments. If the manager stops the blue phone and walks off, the salesman will not have the faintest idea where he is in the sales call and will take several seconds to ‘come out of trance’ and try desperately to get back in the sales call, usually failing to do so. It is like you dropped a salesman off a 30 story building and he doesn’t realize it until just before he hits the sidewalk.
I personally have blue phoned hundreds of sales calls and know exactly what a blue phoned person looks like: As if in an intense trance. And they are in an intense trance. I am an expert in Blue Phoning and I know what a Blue Phoned person looks like, the expression on his face, the eyeball movements, the stress level, the body movements…..everything.
In debate #2 and debate # 3, Obama was Blue Phoned. Whether it was an ear piece, a teleprompter or a brain implant, I do not know. I only know that he was Blue Phoned.”

Update (Nov. 5, 2012):

Jim McElwee of ItMakesSenseBlog posted these pics of Obama’s right ear taken from the 3rd debate (h/t Sally!):


Here’s a comment from a reader of ItMakesSenseBlog:

Jo Ann Spain:

October 24, 2012 at 6:04 pm

I am a retired Licensed Optician (40 year experience) with a PhD…. I have also fit hearing aids for many years.. I knew he had a device in his ear..( I Told my husband & our Friends what to look for) because when ever Mr. Romney was talking, “Obama” turned his head slightly to pick up on a second person talking in his ear to coach him ;I am sure of this…The last 2 debates he had a ” Prompter Ear Device for help~~”.. (Look how REALLY MISERABLY HE DID IN THE FIRST BEBATE WITH NO HELP!!) I wonder how “CLOSE BY” Mr. Bill Clinton or someone” FAR more knowlegable and SAVAY” (MUCH MORE THAN OBAMA” )was available to feed him INFO.. He is’nt that “SMART” because He still didn’t do that well even with the “HELP HE SO OBVIOUSLY RECEIVED!..