The “objections” and “call for objections”
required by our Constitution and 3 U.S.C. § 15 have not been made.
Therefore Obama has never been determined in accordance with the
“electoral and Congressional processes” to be a “qualified” President
elect and is not the President of the United States.
“Chief Justice” John Roberts did
not have any authority to administer oaths to Obama nor did Obama have
the right to take the oaths. Why? Because the “objections” and the “call for objections” that are procedurally required in our Constitution and in 3 U.S.C. § 15 have never been made.
The required “objections” and “call for objections”
are not technicalities, but procedural safeguards provided to protect
the United States from foreign enemies — more specifically from enemy
infiltration. But these highest and foremost safeguards for our Republic
have been entirely disregarded by all the “members” of Congress, all the “judges” and “justices” in our courts, and all the other so-called “public officers.”
Apparently, they are not only acting in a seditious conspiracy against
the Government of the United States, but aiding and comforting foreign
enemies of the United States, and overtly assembling an unconstitutional
army—levying war against the United States.
NOTE: We
the People of the United States in fact do not have representation in
Congress, do not have a president, and do not have honorable judges and
justices in our courts. Instead, they have in fact been acting in a
conspiracy of silence—all of them violating their oath of
office—conspiring against We the People of the United States in back
room deals to remain silent about their usurpation of the Office of
President while committing other treasonous crimes.
3 U.S.C. 15
states in part as
follows:
“Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of
the Senate shall call for objections, if any.”
The word “shall” in 3 U.S.C. 15 (above) means that it is mandatory that the President of the Senate “call for objections.”
This law does not permit the President of the Senate to decide not to
do so: There is no discretionary decision to be made — the President of
the Senate must do as the law requires, i.e., as the People of the
United States require. The words “if any” do not imply that the
President of the Senate should or would know in advance of the count
that “objections” are going to be registered. The word “shall” with “if any” mean that he must call out loudly, “Are there any objections?”
When John McCain was sued in federal
court for his ineligibility (he was born in the Coco Soto “family
hospital” outside the jurisdiction of the United States), Obama and
Hillary Clinton co-sponsored Senate Resolution 511 to persuade United
States District Judge William Alsup to dismiss the lawsuit and motion
for a preliminary injunction alleging that McCain was not a “natural
born Citizen” and must therefore be struck from the ballot in the 2008
election. Obama, Clinton and other senators presented Senate Resolution
511 to the Senate Judiciary Committee and it was then unanimously agreed
to on April 30, 2008. (See Senate Resolution 511) The full text of Resolution 511 is also seen below.
A
person MUST BE born in the United States to “American citizens”
(plural) to be a “natural born Citizen” under the provision of Article
II, Section 1 of our Constitution.
NOTE: The text of Senate Resolution 511 specifically includes the “Whereas” stating that John McC’ain “was born to American citizens” (plural).
This is an illegitimate “presidency” and “vice presidency.”
Judge Alsup did not make a decision
during most of the 2008 campaign and then he dismissed the case,
including its motion for preliminary injunction, just prior to the
election. In the first paragraph of his order to dismiss Alsup stated
that “John McCain’s parents were both United States citizens” (plural). Alsup then in the conclusion of his order to dismiss the motion for a preliminary injunction, wrote, “It is highly probable, for the purposes of this motion for provisional relief, that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen.” See Judge Alsup’s order.
NOTE: Having dismissed the case, Judge
Alsup in fact did not make a decision as to whether or not McCain was a
“natural born Citizen,” but only wrote that it is “highly probable” that he is one and based his statement only on the fact that McCain was born to “United States citizens” (plural), not on the fact that McCain was born outside the jurisdiction of the United States.
Both Senate Resolution 511 and Judge Alsup’s order to dismiss specifically acknowledge that John McCain “was born to American citizens” (plural). Every member of Congress, including Obama, judge and justice in the United States knows that a person must be “born to American citizens” (plural) to be a “natural born Citizen”. Senate Resolution 511 states as follows:
“Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens [plural] of the United States … Now, therefore, be it Resolved that John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘natural born Citizen‘ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”
Judge Alsup and all the senators who
sponsored and agreed to Senate Resolution 511 know that the two
requirements in the term “natural born Citizen” are:
1) A person must have been born in the United States, and
2) His/her parents must have been United States citizens (plural).
NOTE: Judge Alsup’s acknowledgment that “John McCain’s parents were both United States citizens” (plural) and his subsequent statement that “It is highly probable, for the purposes of this motion for provisional relief, that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen,” is the FORMAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT of a United States federal court that a person, to be eligible to assume the Office of President, must have been born to “United States citizens” (plural).
It is in the meaning of “natural born
Citizen” that a person, in order to be eligible to be the President of
the United States, must be 100% under the jurisdiction of the United
States, i.e., not only born on United States soil, but also born to two “citizens of the United States” (plural), i.e., not owing allegiance to anyone else.
These two men and their numerous other co-conspirators are conspiring against the United States Constitution.
Judge William Alsup also, as grounds for
his decision in 2008 to dismiss the case alleging that John McCain’s is
not a natural born Citizen and the motion for a preliminary injunction
to strike McCain from the ballot in the 2008 election, stated in his
order to dismiss that the time and actions to challenge a person who is
not a “natural born Citizen” is to bring the arguments regarding his or
her lack of qualifications “to the voting public before the election”
and in “objections” to be registered after the electoral votes are
counted, as specified in the electoral procedure provided in 3 U.S.C 15.
Judge Alsup stated, “the statute provides a mechanism for objections to
be registered and resolved,” and he also quoted from the statute and
the Twentieth Amendment of our Constitution:
“[e]very objection shall be made in
writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument,
the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one
Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be
received. When all objections so made … shall have been received and
read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be
submitted to the Senate for its decision: and the Speaker of the House
of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the
House of Representatives for its decision.”
ibid. The Twentieth Amendment further provides:
“… if the President elect shall have
failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President
until a President shall have qualified, and the Congress may by law
provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice
President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as
President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be elected,
and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice
President shall have qualified.”
Judge Alsup continues in his order as follows:
“It is clear that
mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any
challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are
counted and that the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how
to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify. Issues
regarding qualifications for president are quintessentially suited to
the foregoing process. Arguments concerning qualifications or lack
thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and,
once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral
votes are counted in Congress. The members of the Senate and the House
of Representatives are well qualified to adjudicate any objections to
ballots for allegedly unqualified candidates. Therefore, this order
holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the
Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the
first instance. Judicial review — if any — should occur only after the
electoral and Congressional processes have run their course. Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300–02 (1998).”
Judge Alsup makes a specific point of stating above that the “The
members of the Senate and the House of Representatives are well
qualified to adjudicate any objections to ballots for allegedly
unqualified candidates.” In other words, he very clearly
(specifically) stated that the members of the Senate and the House of
Representatives know all of the eligibility requirements of the United
States Constitution and are required by the People of the United States
to apply them. Judge Alsup stated that “judicial review — if any — should occur only “after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.”
NOTE: Although Judge Alsup’s decision to
dismiss the case and motion for a preliminary injunction were in a case
regarding McCain, he carefully outlined the processes that are required
by law to take place in determining whether a candidate can be a
“qualified” President elect, and the fact is that neither of the processes stated in Judge Alsup’s order to dismiss took place. The voting public was not
informed during the campaigns in 2008 and 2012 of the fact that Obama
was ineligible to assume the Office of President. Dick Cheney, the
President of the Senate, never made the “call for objections”
required by 3 U.S.C. 15 and the members of Congress, although they all
knew that Obama was ineligible to assume the Office of President, did
not make the required “objections”. These procedural
processes carefully established in the law as safeguards against enemy
infiltration and specifically cited within Judge Alsup’s order, were in
fact willfully violated by all of the “candidates and members of Congress.”
We
no longer have three branches of government to check and balance
powers: They have all united under Obama and are in fact levying war
against the United States.
The People of the United States do not
need a court/judge to see that Obama did not take the required
(provided) qualification test, (i.e., that his ineligibility was not
exposed during the campaign, that the required “call for objections” was not made and that all the “members of Congress,” although they knew well that he was ineligible did not make “objections”), and that the clear and only conclusion is that Obama did not and does not qualify as the President elect.
NOTE: No doubt McCain and all of the
senators who sponsored and passed Senate Resolution 511, including Obama
and Clinton, read Judge Alsup’s order. What is really very interesting
is that Judge Alsup stated in his order that “arguments concerning qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election,”
but Clinton, McCain and numerous others who, under their oaths of
office had the responsibility to do so, did not bring up Obama’s lack of
qualifications. McCain in fact conspired with Obama and others not to
bring up the subject of the lack of qualifications, because McCain is
also not a natural born Citizen. Neither did Romney bring up Obama’s
ineligibility. And Clinton was ordered by the Democrat Party to keep her
mouth shut. They all conspired against “the voting public”
and people of the United States before and after the election in 2008.
And not only for the 2008 election, but also before and after the 2012
election.
NOW FOR TWO BIG QUESTIONS
1. Was Dick Cheney, the President of the
Senate and presiding officer after the count of the electoral votes
required by law to make the “call for objections”?
The answer is YES, ABSOLUTELY !!!
3 U.S.C. 15 states in part as follows:
“Congress shall be in
session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the
electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall
of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the
afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their
presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part
of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to
whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate,
all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the
electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened,
presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States,
beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same
in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the
votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes
having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this
subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the
President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the
vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the
persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United
States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the
Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or
paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.”
The word “shall” in 3 U.S.C. 15 (above) means that it is mandatory
that the President of the Senate “call for objections.” This law does
not permit the President of the Senate to decide not to do so. There is
no discretionary decision to be made: The President of the Senate must
do as the law requires, i.e., as the People of the United States require
in their law. The words “if any” do not imply that the President of the
Senate should or would know in advance of the count that “objections”
are going to be registered. The word “shall” with “if any” simply mean that he must call out loudly, “Are there any objections?”
NOTE: As I have stated above, Dick Cheney, did not
“call for objections,” and there is nothing in the law above requiring
members of Congress to notify him prior to the count of the electoral
votes that they have an “objection” to register. The “call for
objections” is not conditioned on whether the President of the Senate
knows if there are going to be “objections”. If it was conditioned on
the President of the Senate’s knowledge that there would be
“objections,” then the the word “will” would be in the place of the word
“shall”: The word “will” with “if” is conditional. The word “shall” with “if” is not.
This requirement for the President of the
Senate to “call for objections” stems from our Constitution, which in
the last sentence of the 12th Amendment says, “But
no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall
be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.” This
last sentence of the 12th Amendment makes it clear that both the
President elect and Vice President elect must qualify to assume the
Office of President.
2. Were the members of Congress required
by the Twelfth and Twentieth Amendments and 3 U.S.C. 15 to present
“objections” regarding Obama’s lack of qualifications to Dick Cheney
after the count of the electoral votes?
The answer is YES, ABSOLUTELY !!!
Obama, Biden and all the other members of
Congress in 2008 and 2012 willfully violated procedural safeguards
stemming from the United States Constitution, specified in 3 U.S.C. 15
and additionally outlined by a federal court. And these procedural
safeguards are specifically to protect the United States from foreign
enemies infiltrating our highest office and national defenses. The
members of Congress MUST BE held accountable to the United States
Constitution (the will of the people), otherwise they are not
representatives of the people. All the members of Congress knew or
should have know (from Obama’s books) that Obama’s father was never an
American citizen, and that Obama was, therefore, ineligible to assume
the Office of President. We are talking about lawyers in Congress
(experts who were trusted by the people). Many of them had read Senate
Resolution 511 and they passed it knowing the meaning of the term
“natural born Citizen”. For the few ignorant members of Congress there
is no excuse. It is in fact their job to know the meaning of “natural
born Citizen”.
“No Person except a
natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of
the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
President;…”
Second, Congress does not have authority
to redefine “natural born Citizen,” and in fact the First Congress did
not redefine it. It is in fact not possible to redefine a Natural God
Given Right. The First Congress did not state in 1790 that children of
citizens [plural] of the United States born beyond the sea, or out of
the limits of the United States were “natural born Citizens.” What the
First Congress stated is that “children of citizens (plural) born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as, [i.e., accounted as or deemed as], natural-born citizens,” not that they are “natural born Citizens.”
The Naturalization Act of 1790 states that “children
of citizens [plural] of the United States, that may be born beyond the
sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens.”
NOTE: The members of Congress are not
permitted to change the meaning of “natural born Citizen” as it stands
in our Constitution. They know the meaning of the term and that they are
not permitted to define or redefine the term, and yet there were many
attempts by members of Congress in the years leading up to the 2008
election to change the meaning (redefine) “natural born Citizen”. And
their attempts reveal that they know that a “natural born Citizen” is a
person born within the United States of citizen parents (plural).
NOTE: Nowhere in Judge Alsup’s order did
he decide that the Congress has the role to define the term “natural
born Citizen.” Alsup stated Congress has “the role of defining citizenship, including citizenship by reason of birth,” but he did not decide that Congress has the role of defining “natural born Citizen”. He in fact clarified that “the Fourteenth Amendment set a floor on citizenship, but to not define “natural born Citizen”), and provided that all born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, were citizens.” Judge Alsup also did not determine that those who had acquired “citizenship” under the Fourteenth Amendment were “natural born Citizens.” John Bingham (the author of the 14th Amendment) wrote as follows:
“All
from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a
compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted
citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the
Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens.”
CONCLUSION:
These are willful violations of
procedural law which have no place in our Republic and in fact these
violations denied The People of the United States representation — these
required “processes” did not took place. First of all,
numerous members of Congress, including Barack Obama, John McCain,
Hillary Clinton, and Mick Romney obviously knew full and well the
meaning of the term “natural born Citizen, but as Judge Alsup states,
did not inform the voting public of Obama’s ineligibility “before the election.”
Neither did Dick Cheney “call for objections” after the counting of the
electoral votes. And these violations of law in fact immediately
disqualified Obama as the “President elect” and render his claimed “presidency” void ab initio. He is not “the President.” In fact Obama cannot be lawfully impeached: Only a president can be impeached.
As Judge Alsup has stated in his order to
dismiss, a “call for objections” must be made and the objections
“registered”. And after the objections are registered the objections
must be “resolved” by both the Senate and House of Representatives.
‘This is the law, not because Judge Alsup says so, but because our
Constitution and 2 U.S.C. 15 say so. Until the required objections to
Obama’s ineligibility are “registered” and “resolved,” the People of the
United States are willfully denied lawful representation, denied a
president and denied the protection of the laws under three branches of
government. In fact today, the courts are making the law, Obama is
violating the law and Congress is conspiring with them.
ITS TIME FOR REVOLUTION.
THE WHOLE SYSTEM HAS BEEN CO-OPTED
Stanley Ann Soetoro in 1968.
Then there is the theory that Dunham gave birth in Hawaii.
He was Indonesian all along.
Well…That is exactly what those who took Obama from a Community Organizer to the white house clearly wouldn’t want known.
