EXPOSED: THE WORST OFFENSE OF A SECRETIVE THUG ADMINISTRATION. NOW ALL OF IT MAKES SENSE. BLACKMAIL!
First lets cut the crap and call it what it is.
"Unmasking" in simple terms is "SPYING".
Why Justice Roberts switched his vote. Why Angela Merkel became the Pro Islamic German leader she is. Why Pope Benedict suddenly retired. Why John Boehner sided with Obama and suddenly retired. Why Romney Ryan were always one step behind in the 2012 elections. Why the Republicans were always exposed and why Key Conservatives like John McCain and Lindsay Graham switched sides in the fight. They had all their dirty little secrets!
BLACK MAIL IS A POWERFUL TOOL USED BY SPYMASTERS AROUND THE GLOBE.
The National Security Agency under former President Barack Obama
routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through
overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems
until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last
fall, according to once top-secret documents that chronicle some of the
most serious constitutional abuses to date by the U.S. intelligence
community.
More than 5 percent, or one out of every 20 searches seeking upstream
Internet data on Americans inside the NSA’s so-called Section 702
database violated the safeguards Obama and his intelligence chiefs vowed
to follow in 2011, according to one classified internal report reviewed
by Circa.
The Obama administration self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door
hearing Oct. 26 before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that
set off alarm. Trump was elected less than two weeks later.
The normally supportive court censured administration officials,
saying the failure to disclose the extent of the violations earlier
amounted to an “institutional lack of candor” and that the improper
searches constituted a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue,” according
to a recently unsealed court document dated April 26, 2017.
The admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the
intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to
justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans.
Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data
searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s
identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy
rules in 2011.
Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have
argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule
changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly
monitored to avoid abuses.
The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true. The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed
violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and
strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to
police itself and safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the
Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and
seizure.
Yes ...
Obama Intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years.
For what you have to ask yourself. Not because it could.. but because they had a plan. To STEAL AMERICA! No other answer will make sense! You can see the results.
The National Security Agency under former President Barack Obama
routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through
overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems
until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last
fall, according to once top-secret documents that chronicle some of the
most serious constitutional abuses to date by the U.S. intelligence
community. More than 5 percent, or one out of every 20
searches seeking upstream Internet data on Americans inside the NSA’s
so-called Section 702 database violated the safeguards Obama and his
intelligence chiefs vowed to follow in 2011, according to one classified
internal report reviewed by Circa. The Obama administration
self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door hearing Oct. 26 before the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that set off alarm. Trump was
elected less than two weeks later. The normally supportive court censured administration officials,
saying the failure to disclose the extent of the violations earlier
amounted to an “institutional lack of candor” and that the improper
searches constituted a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue,” according
to a recently unsealed court document dated April 26, 2017. The
admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the
intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to
justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans.
Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data
searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s
identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy
rules in 2011. Officials like former National Security Adviser
Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called
minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies
were strictly monitored to avoid abuses. The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true. “Since
2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person
identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under
Section 702,” the unsealed court ruling declared. “The Oct. 26, 2016
notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such
queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency
than had been previously disclosed to the Court.” Speaking
Wednesday on Fox News, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said there was an apparent
effort under the Obama Administration to increase the number of
unmaskings of Americans. "If we determine this to be true, this is an enormous abuse of power," Paul said. “This will dwarf all other stories.” “There are hundreds and hundreds of people,” Paul added. The
American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are
some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into
question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and
safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth
Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure. “I
think what this emphasizes is the shocking lack of oversight of these
programs,” said Neema Singh Guliani, the ACLU’s legislative counsel in
Washington. “You have these problems going on for years that only
come to the attention of the court late in the game and then it takes
additional years to change its practices. “I think it does call
into question all those defenses that we kept hearing, that we always
have a robust oversight structure and we have culture of adherence to
privacy standards,” she added. “And the headline now is they actually
haven’t been in compliance for years and the FISA court itself says in
its opinion is that the NSA suffers from a culture of a lack of candor.” The
NSA acknowledged it self-disclosed the mass violations to the court
last fall and that in April it took the extraordinary step of suspending
the type of searches that were violating the rules, even deleting prior
collected data on Americans to avoid any further violations. “NSA
will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely
mention a foreign intelligence target,” the agency said in the statement
that was dated April 28 and placed on its Web site without capturing
much media or congressional attention. In question is the
collection of what is known as upstream “about data”about an American
that is collected even though they were not directly in contact with a
foreigner that the NSA was legally allowed to intercept. The NSA
said it doesn't have the ability to stop collecting ‘about’ information
on Americans, “without losing some other important data. ” It, however,
said it would stop the practice to “reduce the chance that it would
acquire communication of U.S. persons or others who are not in direct
contact with a foreign intelligence target.” The NSA said it also
plans to “delete the vast majority of its upstream internet data to
further protect the privacy of U.S. person communications.” Agency
officials called the violations “inadvertent compliance lapses.” But
the court and IG documents suggest the NSA had not developed a
technological way to comply with the rules they had submitted to the
court in 2011. Officials "explained that NSA query compliance is
largely maintained through a series of manual checks" and had not
"included the proper limiters" to prevent unlawful searches, the NSA
internal watchdog reported in a top secret report in January that was
just declassified. A new system is being developed now, officials said. The
NSA conducts thousand of searches a year on data involving Americans
and the actual numbers of violations were redacted from the documents
Circa reviewed. But a chart in the report showed there three types
of violations, the most frequent being 5.2 percent of the time when NSA
Section 702 upstream data on U.S. persons was searched. The
inspector general also found noncompliance between 0.7 percent and 1.4
percent of the time involving NSA activities in which there was a court
order to target an American for spying but the rules were still not
followed. Those activities are known as Section 702 and Section 705
spying.
The
IG report spared few words for the NSA’s efforts before the disclosure
to ensure it was complying with practices, some that date to rules
issued in 2008 in the final days of the Bush administration and others
that Obama put into effect in 2011. “We found that the Agency
controls for monitoring query compliance have not been completely
developed,” the inspector general reported, citing problems ranging from
missing requirements for documentation to the failure to complete
controls that would ensure “query compliance.” The NSA’s Signal
Intelligence Directorate, the nation’s main foreign surveillance arm,
wrote a letter back to the IG saying it agreed with the findings and
that “corrective action plans” are in the works.
NOW YOU KNOW...
DO NOT LET SOME FOOLISH TALKING HEAD SWAY YOUR UNDERSTANDING. WE ARE LIVING IN A POLICE STATE IF THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT PROSECUTE AND HANG THE PERPETRATORS!
JUST LIKE OBAMA AND SO MANY OTHERS IN THE LAST 8 YEARS OF CRIME AND FRAUD AND CHICANERY... and like her predecessor, Eric Holder, former Attorney General and like her Boss Barack Hussein Obama who all use FAKE emails to hide their crimes, Loretta
Lynch used an email alias to conduct government business to cover her tracks on making sure Hillary Clinton was protected from Indictment from crimes tied to her own crookedness.
Call the Justice Department Phone 202 514 2000 Ext. 4 and tell them to Investigate NOW!.
Several of Lynch’s emails were included in 413 pages
of DOJ documents provided to the conservative groups Judicial Watch and
the American Center for Law and Justice. Both groups had filed lawsuits
for records regarding Lynch’s controversial meeting with President Bill
Clinton at the Phoenix airport last June 27. Using the pseudonym “Elizabeth Carlisle,” Lynch corresponded with DOJ
press officials to hammer out talking points in response to media
requests about the meeting. She wanted to be sure to cover her tracks and minimize the impact by working with lackeys in the press corp at the NY Times and the Washington post and alphabet Networks.
The tarmac was exposed by a lone reporter on the ground and rightfully encountered criticism from
conservatives because Lynch was overseeing the federal investigation
into whether Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information on her
private email system. The meeting was revealed not by Lynch in her testimony, Clinton, the FBI under James Comey or the Justice Department but by a reporter in Phoenix working based on a tip.
On June 28, a reporter with Phoenix’s ABC News affiliate contacted
the Justice Department to inquire about the meeting. Internal DOJ emails
show that the request touched off a mad-dash to develop talking points
and statements to respond to the developing story. Just remember that Loretta Lynch is supposed to be the top Law enforcement Officer in the land.. and she is up to her eyeballs in CRIME to COVER UP Hillary's Crimes. Bought and Paid for based on Idelogy and Skin Color. Lynch, using the Elizabeth Carlisle account, which was hosted on the
Justice Department’s system, was involved in directing those discussions. Crooks cover their tracks in the hope they do not get caught. Eric Holder hiding information to protect Obama used the alias “Lew Alcindor” — the birth name of NBA legend
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar — as his email handle until he left DOJ in 2015. The Carlisle emails were discovered over the weekend by followers of
Reddit accounts that support President Trump. Some users developed the
theory that Lynch used her grandmother’s name as a her pseudonym. Others
concluded that Lynch broke the law by using a pseudonym, though it is
not illegal for government officials to do so unless they do it in the interpreting or covering up of a CRIME.
In one email, sent just minutes after ABC News inquired about the
tarmac meeting, Melanie Newman, the director of DOJ’s public affairs
office at the time, wrote an email to the Elizabeth Carlisle
account that she addressed to “AG Lynch.” This shows that the Alphabet Networks were partners in the crime since they already knew the Loretta Lynch secret email address. Lynch responded later in the day to Newman and other DOJ officials. “Thanks to all who worked on this,” reads the reply, which was ended with the initials “AG.” Using the Carlisle account, Lynch was involved in several other email
exchanges discussing drafts of talking points regarding her interaction
with Clinton. We are certain that these were not the only times she used this email. She has used this email to direct payers of bribes and kickbacks to certain secret accounts in payment for her roles in the various schemes cooked up by the Clinton Gang. Nobody does illegal things for FREE!! On June 29, Newman sent an email to the account — again with a
greeting for “AG Lynch” — containing TV clips of news coverage of the
airport encounter. Lynch then went on to lie and downplay her meeting with Clinton, even though it had significant influence on the Clinton email probe. This is the Obstruction of Justice that the new Trump Justice Department must investigate!
The laws in this country were not written for the Citizen and excluded the Political connected and the Law Enforcers.
Lynch lied then that the former president boarded her airplane
uninvited and spoke for about 30 minutes with her and her husband. She
said that the conversation centered on grandchildren and other mundane
issues like golf. Another lie. She has insisted that the Hillary Clinton email investigation
was not discussed. Another lie. Heads must roll for such abuses of power and lying! Cornered Lynch reluctantly relinquished control over the email
investigation after acknowledging that the meeting could be interpreted
in a negative light. ( Yeah Right!!) Then she passed the baton onto another crook. He was instructed what was to be said and done to cover for Hillary. FBI Director James Comey stepped in to oversee the investigation,
which came to an end on July 5 when he gave a press conference
announcing that charges would not be filed against Clinton. This was all part of the crooked dealings of the past administration.
Though Comey
said that there was not enough evidence to prosecute the former
secretary of state, he criticized her carelessness in using a private
email account to send and receive classified information. Other Obama administration officials have been caught using email aliases. Tarmac Meeting Another bombshell revealed in ACLJ’s release concerns several of the
emails obtained address the secretive “tarmac” meeting between Bill
Clinton and Loretta Lynch, which happened right around the time the
Obama administration began issuing FOIA requests to unmask the Trump
team. Per ACLJ:
One with the subject line “FLAG”was
correspondence between FBI officials (Richard Quinn, FBI
Media/Investigative Publicity, and Michael Kortan) and DOJ officials
concerning “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting
between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official
instructs the FBI to “let me know if you get any questions about this”
and provides “[o]ur talkers [DOJ talking points] on this”. The talking
points, however are redacted.
Another email to the FBI contains the subject line “security details coordinate between Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton?”
On July 1, 2016 – just days before our FOIA request – a DOJ email chain under the subject line, “FBI just called,” indicates
that the “FBI . . . is looking for guidance” in responding to media
inquiries about news reports that the FBI had prevented the press from
taking pictures of the Clinton Lynch meeting. The discussion then went
off email to several phone calls (of which we are not able to obtain
records). An hour later, Carolyn Pokomy of the Office of the Attorney
General stated, “I will let Rybicki know.” Jim Rybicki was the Chief of
Staff and Senior Counselor to FBI Director Jim Comey. The information
that was to be provided to Rybicki is redacted.
Lynch had previously said that
the tarmac meeting was ‘unscheduled’ described as an ‘ambush’ by
former President Bill Clinton, and that she ‘wouldn’t do it again.’ The
ACLJ’s document dump suggests otherwise, as the FBI and DOJ scrambled to
do damage control.
It has been exposed that crooks and Cohorts in the schemes tied to the Obama cabal all used phony names and aliases to cover their illegal acts.
AND THEN THERE IS THE PERJURY=> Loretta Lynch LIED UNDER OATH – She Told Trey Gowdy She Only Uses Official Email (Video) A Black Face Lie since we now expose the truth. AG Loretta Lynch told Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) under oath that she
only uses official email in November 2016 — after these above emails
were sent.
Watch the video . and ask yourself. HOW DARE THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LOOK THE OTHER WAY?
Former IRS official Lois Lerner, who targeted conservative non-profit
groups seeking tax-exempt status, occasionally used the alias “Toby
Miles” to send and receive work emails. Lisa Jackson, the former administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency, infamously used the alias “Richard Windsor” to
conduct work business and yes Head Crook Barack Hussein Obama used a phony email ON THE CLINTON SERVER to conduct his extortion and kick back schemes while lying to the people through CBS 60 Minutes that he knew nothing about the Clinton Server until it was brought up in the press. YES. HE LIED... WHILE HE WAS CONDUCTING HIS ILLEGAL MONEY SCHEMES. THIS IS THE LEVEL OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.
So my question to you all is ..."If they are allowed to get away with it.. who do you blame?"
My Answer.. " Blame us ALL"
If we do not demand justice in this society and get it.. we are no better off than Venezuela or Cuba. Only that our facade is prettier and more clean!
If the Trump Justice Department looks the other way and chase low hanging fruit like MS 13 and illegal aliens while the bigger crooks reside in their mansions comfortable in the knowledge that they will not be touched... THEN WE HAVE LOST THE REPUBLIC!
ACT NOW.. CALL THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND DEMAND INVESTIGATIONS AND SUBPOENA'S.
Not through Congress that is a TOOTHLESS TIGER with no power to Indict.. BUT THROUGH THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT! Call the Justice Department Phone 202 514 2000 Ext. 4 and tell them to Investigate NOW!. More Info on Loretta Lynch and Hillary Connections: http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2016/11/loretta-lynch-is-protecting-hillary.html
How Congress ( 100 Senators and 540 Congressmen + their staff) Fraudulently claimed to be a ‘Small Business’ to Qualify for Obamacare Subsidies while the rest of us were screwed!
This scandal shows that the SWAMP has both Republicans and Democrats.Obama presided over this FRAUD as a bribe to get them to pass this FRAUD!
Read and SHARE how key administration and
Congressional officials connived to create, under cover of Obamacare,
special health insurance subsidies just for members of Congress. CROOKS & LIARS.
So now you know why they are in no hurry to REPEAL OBAMACARE. THEY HAVE A GOOD THING GOING!
DONALD TRUMP CAN STOP THIS FRAUD BY EXECUTIVE ORDER AND MAKE THEM FEEL THE PAIN TOO!
Here’s the blow by blow in this scam
Rushing
to enact the giant Obamacare bill in March 2010, Congress voted itself
out of its own employer-sponsored health insurance coverage—the Federal
Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). Section 1312(d)(3)(D)
required members of Congress and staff to enroll in the new health
insurance exchange system. But in pulling out of the Federal Employees
Health Benefits Program, they also cut themselves off from their
employer-based insurance contributions.
(It should be noted
that, before final passage, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, offered an
amendment that would have provided Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program subsidies for congressional enrollees in Obamacare, but Senate
Democrats defeated it on a procedural vote, 56-43.)
Obamacare’s
insurance subsidies for ordinary Americans are generous, but capped by
income. No one with an annual income over $47,080 gets a subsidy. That’s
well below typical Capitol Hill salaries. Members of Congress make
$174,000 annually, and many on their staff have impressive,
upper-middle-class paychecks.
So, let’s follow the thickening plot: Act One—Congress Has a Panic Attack Realizing
what they had done, Congressional leaders sought desperately to get
fatter taxpayer subsidies in the Obamacare exchange system. In a
nutshell, they wanted special funding unavailable to other Americans.
The standard excuse was that, without a special “sweetener,” a Capitol
Hill “brain drain” would ensue; the best and brightest would flee to the
private sector to get more affordable employment-based coverage.
From
2010 to 2013, House and Senate leaders schemed to get extra taxpayer
subsidies—past “the Tea Party rabble”—without a lot of noise, and secure
a nice, quiet “administrative” remedy from the Obama administration.
Their
hopes centered on a compliant Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the
agency that administers the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program,
providing the unauthorized relief. No recorded votes. No ugly floor
fights.
Act Two—Congress Gets Taxpayers’ Money Without Appropriating It
Anticipating an attempted “end run” around the law, on August 2, 2013, the Heritage Foundation published a detailed paper
outlining the legislative history of the controversy. The analysis
concluded that neither the Affordable Care Act nor Chapter 89 of Title V
(the law governing the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program)
authorized the transfer of monies in the Federal Employees Health
Benefits Program trust fund for use in health plans outside of the
program.
Shortly thereafter, on August 13, 2013, Timothy Jost, professor of law at Washington and Lee University, wrote in his Health Affairs Blog:
“The
exchanges are only open to individuals and small employers. No large
employers can participate in the exchange, at least not yet. There is no
provision, therefore for large employers, including the largest—the
United States government—to pay for exchange coverage. “Digging
into the role of former House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid,D-Nev., on Oct. 1, 2013, Politicoreported, ‘OPM initially ruled that lawmakers and staffers couldn’t receive the subsidies once they went into the exchanges.’”
So, on August 7, 2013, just as Congress was getting out of town for the August recess, OPM ruled
that members of Congress and staff enrolled in the exchange program
would get Federal Employees Health Benefits Program subsidies, even
though they were no longer in the program.
Act Three—Congress Magically Becomes a "Small Business" with under 50 employees.
In
a second iteration of its rule-making, OPM declared that Congress and
staff were eligible to enroll in the Washington D.C. “SHOP” Exchange, a
health insurance exchange reserved for small businesses with fewer than
50 employees. The exchange offers special insurance subsidies to
participating small businesses.
The problem was, of course, that
Congress is not a “small business,” at least under any clinically sane
definition of the term, and no section of the Affordable Care Act
provided for any congressional exemption from the ban on large-employer
participation in the SHOP exchanges. It’s hard to imagine a more
arbitrary ruling.
Act Four—Congressional Bureaucrats File False Paperwork In
filing to get the special insurance subsidies for enrolling lawmakers
and their staff members in the D.C. “SHOP” Exchange , congressional
officials claimed that the Senate and House each had only 45 employees.
That false information allowed both chambers to meet the magic number
requirement.
In Feb. 2015, Sen. David Vitter, R-La., a member of
the Senate’s Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee, attempted to
subpoena these un-redacted documents, only to be stymied by all nine
Committee Democrats and five Republicans.
According to National Review,
Sen.Vitter’s effort was opposed by the Senate leadership. As for the
five Committee Republicans, they alibied their votes with excuses that
ranged from the merely lame to the transparently absurd.
Now the
issue is simmering again. This month, Michael Cannon of the CATO
Institute and John Malcolm, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Meese
Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, wrote in The Hill:
“Documents
obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show that unnamed
officials who administer benefits for Congress made clearly false
statements when they applied to have the House and Senate participate inD.C.’s ‘SHOP’ Exchange for 2014. Notably, they claimed the 435 member
House had only 45 members and 45 staffers, while the 100-member Senate
had only 45 employees total. Rather than a good faith clerical error,
this was an intentional falsehood, which makes it a crime under both
federal and D.C. law.”CROOKS! THEY ARE ALL CROOKS!
