“Who controls the past controls the 
future. Who controls the present controls the past.”
 That line from George Orwell’s 
“Nineteen Eighty-Four” might serve as a sort of motto for the woke apparatchiks 
who run our lives today.
That line from George Orwell’s 
“Nineteen Eighty-Four” might serve as a sort of motto for the woke apparatchiks 
who run our lives today. 
Perhaps it's because they have, as 
one wag put it, mistaken Orwell’s stern admonition about the dangers of 
totalitarianism for a how-to manual.
 
In any event, the present’s attack on 
the past by those holding the reins of power continues apace.
And the goal, just as in Orwell’s 
novel, is to revamp the future by redefining the past.
John Calhoun was an apologist for 
slavery, so the college named for him at Yale must be renamed.
Never mind that he was valedictorian 
at Yale, a member of the House of Representatives, a senator, Secretary of War, 
Secretary of State, and vice president.
Never mind, too, that he was one of 
the most powerful minds and greatest orators of his day.
He had beliefs that the beautiful, 
pampered people of today find objectionable.
So he had to go.
It was the same with the great mining 
magnate Cecil Rhodes.
He made a stupendous fortune in 
what's now South Africa, endowed Oriel College, Oxford, with part of his 
fortune, and established the Rhodes scholarship program.
He too was insufficiently 
enlightened, so a campaign to besmirch his memory and remove all traces of his 
presence from Oriel College has been underway for years.
From 1924 to 2021, a large equestrian 
statue of Robert E. Lee stood in a place of honor in Charlottesville, 
Virginia.
In the wake of the Black Lives Matter 
riots, the statue was removed. Last fall, in a sort of pyromaniacal ritual, it 
was cut apart with a blow torch and then melted down.
Last month, President Joe Biden had 
the 109-year-old Reconciliation Monument removed from Arlington National 
Cemetery.
 
Just a few days ago, the Biden 
administration announced that it was removing a statue of William Penn, the 
founder of Pennsylvania, from a park that had been his home.
That spot will undergo a “rehabilitation” and, in place of Penn, the 
administration will place a statute of an American Indian in order, to provide a 
more “inclusive ... interpretation of the Native American history of 
Philadelphia.”
The attack on the past is proceeding 
apace.
Its goal is to efface the 
contributions of white Europeans, especially white male Europeans, to the 
formation of Western civilization.
Over the past several years, we have 
seen a rising tide of assaults on statues and other works of art representing 
our nation’s history by those who are eager to squeeze that complex story into a 
box defined by the evolving rules of political correctness.
A vocal minority, claiming victim 
status, demands the destruction, removal, or concealment of some object of which 
they disapprove.
Usually, the official response is 
instant capitulation.
It's worth noting that the monument 
controversy signifies something much larger than the attacks on the Old 
South.
Indeed, the attack involves not just 
artworks or commemorative objects.
Rather, it encompasses the resources 
of the past writ large.
It's an attack on the past for 
failing to live up to our contemporary notions of virtue.
In the background is the conviction 
that we, blessed members of the most enlightened cohort ever to grace the earth 
with its presence, occupy a moral plane superior to all who came before 
us.
Consequently, the defacement of 
murals of Christopher Columbus—and statues of later historical figures such as 
Teddy Roosevelt—is perfectly virtuous and above criticism since human beings in 
the past were by definition so much less enlightened than we.
The psychopathology behind these 
occurrences is a subject unto itself.
What has happened in our culture and 
educational institutions that so many students jump from their feelings of being 
offended—and how delicate they are, how quick to take offense!—to self-righteous 
demands to repudiate the thing that offends them?
The more expensive education becomes, 
the more it seems to lead, not to broader understanding, but to narrower 
horizons.
The iconoclasm that accompanies this 
existential narrowing takes different forms.
The disgusting attacks on the past 
and other religious cultures carried out by the Taliban, for example, are quite 
different from the toppling of statues of Saddam Hussein by liberated Iraqis 
after the Gulf War.
Different again was the action of 
America’s own Sons of Liberty in 1776, who toppled a statue of the hated George 
III and melted down its lead to make 40,000 musket balls.
It's easy to sympathize with that 
pragmatic response to what the Declaration of Independence called “a long train 
of abuses and usurpations.”
It's worth noting, however, that 
George Washington censured even this action for “having much the appearance of a 
riot and a want of discipline.”
While such attacks on the past depend 
upon a reservoir of iconoclastic feeling, they represent not the blunt 
expression of power or destructiveness but rather the rancorous, self-despising 
triumph of political correctness.
The exhibition of wounded virtue, of 
what we now call “virtue-signaling,” is key.
Of course, impermissible attitudes 
and images are never in short supply once the itch to stamp out history gets 
going.
At Charlottesville it was a statue of 
Robert E. Lee.
But why stop there?
Why not erase the entire history of 
the Confederacy?
There are apparently some 1,500 
monuments and memorials to the Confederacy in public spaces across the United 
States.
According to one study, a majority of 
them were “commissioned by white women, in hope of preserving a positive vision 
of antebellum life.”
A noble aspiration, inasmuch as the 
country had recently fought a civil war that devastated the South and left more 
than 700,000 Americans dead.
These memorials were part of an 
effort to knit the broken country back together.
As at Arlington, our leaders have set 
about obliterating them in earnest.
What they want isn't reconciliation 
but capitulation.
Thomas Jefferson and George 
Washington and James Madison have all been queued up for “rehabilitation” if not 
ostracism.
After all, they all owned slaves, as 
did 41 of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence.
As I say, many of our politically 
correct culture warriors seem to regard “Nineteen Eighty-Four” as a how-to 
manual.
Orwell saw clearly where it 
ends.
“Every record has been destroyed or 
falsified,” Orwell wrote, “every book has been rewritten, every picture has been 
repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has 
been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. 
History has stopped.”
 
 
We stand by and watch it happen sitting on our asses as we watch the obliteration of our culture and Legacy by People who did nothing to build up this country! And don't tell me that black slaves built America. That's bullshit if it weren't the blacks it would have been donkeys and horses and the Irish and who ever else until the Industrial Revolution took hold.