ASK THE DEMOCRATS AND THE BLACK COMMUNITY LEADERS AND BILL GATES AND THE GATES FOUNDATION...WHO ARE THE RACISTS !
NANCY PELOSI, CHUCK SCHUMER AND THE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY...
(THE PARTY OF THE KKK).. HAVE FOUND AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD RIGHT UNDER
THE NOSES OF POOR BLACKS, TO REDUCE THEIR POPULATION! THIS IS WHAT
REAL RACISM LOOKS LIKE!
THEY DO NOT WANT BLACKS IN THEIR VOTER POOL. THEY DO NOT WORK AS HARD. THEY WANT HARD WORKING SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICANS IN THEIR VOTER POOL AND THEY WANT THEM TO WORK WITHOUT COMPLAINING!
Abortion, by the numbers, is a racist institution. This statement has nothing to do with agendas or intent. It has everything to do with the simple, undeniable reality that in the United States, abortion kills minority children at more than three times the rate of non-Hispanic, white children.
The Reverend Clenard H. Childress calls this phenomenon "black genocide," and has built a national ministry around its exposure. Alveda C. King, daughter of slain civil-rights leader A.D. King and niece of Martin Luther King, Jr., quotes her uncle often when outlining her opposition of abortion.
She writes:
[Martin
Luther King, Jr.] once said, “The Negro cannot win as long as he is
willing to sacrifice the lives of his children for comfort and
safety.” How can the “Dream” survive if we murder the children?
Every aborted baby is like a slave in the womb of his or her mother.
The mother decides his or her fate.
Lest you feel these claims
are an exaggeration, consider the numbers. According to 2010 census
data, African Americans make up 12.6% of the U.S. population2 but the
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that black women accounted
for 35.4% of all abortions in 2009.3
The Guttmacher Institute (AGI) puts the percentage of black abortions at 30% of the U.S. total.
Their most recent numbers are from 2008. Similarly, AGI tells us that Hispanic women accounted for 25% of all U.S. abortions in 2008,6 though Hispanics make up just 16.3% of the U.S. population.
The CDC lists the percentage of Hispanic abortions at 20.6%.8 Compare those numbers to non-Hispanic whites, who make up 63.7% of America's population, but account for only 36% of all U.S. abortions (37.7% according to the CDC).
Every day in America, an average of
3,315 human beings lose their lives to abortion. Based on the
percentages above, between 683-829 of those babies are Hispanic,
between 1,193-1,174 are white, and between 995-1,207 are black. Not
only are black children being killed at a far greater percentage than
white children, it's possible they're being killed in greater
numbers, period. Is that not shocking?!
Though the white population
in the U.S. outnumbers the black population five to one, abortion may
well be killing more black children each day than white children.
John Piper, a white pastor with a heart for "racial justice", remarks
on the disparity of abortion this way:
The de facto effect (I
don’t call it the main cause, but net effect) of putting abortion
clinics in the urban centers is that the abortion of Hispanic and
Black babies is more than double their percentage of the population.
Every day 1,300 black babies are killed in America. Seven hundred
Hispanic babies die every day from abortion. Call this what you
will—when the slaughter has an ethnic face and the percentages are
double that of the white community and the killers are almost all
white, something is going on here that ought to make the lovers of
racial equality and racial harmony wake up.
In 2009, a total
of 286,623 blacks died in the U.S.
That same year, an estimated 1.21 million abortions took place in the United States. If 35.4% were performed on black women, that means almost twice as many blacks were killed by abortion as by all other causes.
In 2010, the black population in the U.S. stood just shy of at 39 million.
The CDC reports that during the 1970's, roughly 24% of all U.S. abortions were performed on black women.
That percentage rose to 30% in the 1980's, 34% in the 1990's and 36% in the 2000's.
That means that about 31% of all U.S. abortions since 1973 have been performed on African American women.
Based on the January 2013 estimate that there have been 55.7 million abortions in the United States since 1973, we can deduce that approximately 17 million of the aborted babies were black. Despite an overall black population growth of 12% between 2000 and 2010, the U.S. Census Bureau reports that the black population "grew at a slower rate than most other major race and ethnic groups in the country."
CBS News reported in 2009 that "Hispanics have surpassed blacks as the nation's largest minority group." Can there be any question about the role abortion has played in this demographic shift? Despite similar population numbers, Hispanic women currently account for about 20% of all U.S. abortions, whereas African-American women account for 35%. From 1973 to 2012, abortion reduced the black population by 30%, and that doesn't even factor in all the children that would have been born to those aborted a generation ago. To put it bluntly, abortion has thinned the black community in ways the Ku Klux Klan the RACIST ENTERPRISE FOUNDED BY DEMOCRATS....could have only dreamed of.
The
fact that black leaders, like Ex President Obama, support abortion
rights does not change the reality of what is happening. How many
candidates for public office have abandoned a prior conviction so as
to be consistent with a party platform? This is perhaps nowhere more
evident than in Reverend Jesse Jackson's flip-flop on abortion. Prior
to having ambitions as a Presidential candidate for the Democratic
Party, he was an incredibly eloquent and outspoken opponent of
abortion. Though his public stance on abortion has reversed, his
earlier remarks remain as applicable as ever, and show that there is
more than mere numbers at stake. Abortion attacks the "moral
fabric" of an entire people.
The following remarks come from his
1977 article for the National Right to Life News:
The question
of "life" is The Question of the 20th century. Race and
poverty are dimensions of the life question, but discussions about
abortion have brought the issue into focus in a much sharper way.
How
we will respect and understand the nature of life itself is the
over-riding moral issue, not of the Black race, but of the human
race.
The question of abortion confronts me in several different
ways. First, although I do not profess to be a biologist, I have
studied biology and know something about life from the point of view
of the natural sciences. Second, I am a minister of the Gospel and,
therefore, feel that abortion has a religious and moral dimension
that I must consider. Third, I was born out of wedlock (and against
the advice that my mother received from her doctor) and therefore
abortion is a personal issue for me.
From my perspective, human
life is the highest good, the summum bonum. Human life itself is the
highest human good and God is the supreme good because He is the
giver of life...
There are those who argue that the right to
privacy is of higher order than the right to life. I do not share
that view. I believe that life is not private, but rather it is
public and universal.
If one accepts the position that life is
private, and therefore you have the right to do with it as you
please, one must also accept the conclusion of that logic. That was
the premise of slavery. You could not protest the existence or
treatment of slaves on the plantation because that was private and
therefore outside of your right to concerned.
Another area that
concerns me greatly, namely because I know how it has been used with
regard to race, is the psycholinguistics involved in this whole issue
of abortion. If something can be dehumanized through the rhetoric
used to describe it, then the major battle has been won. Those
advocates of taking life prior to birth do not call it killing or
murder, they call it abortion. They further never talk about aborting
a baby because that would imply something human. Rather they talk
about aborting the fetus. Fetus sounds less than human and therefore
can be justified.
… What happens to the mind of a person, and
the moral fabric of a nation, that accepts the aborting of the life
of a baby without a pang of conscience? What kind of a person, and
what kind of a society will we have 20 years hence if life can be
taken so casually?
It is that question, the question of our
attitude, our value system, and our mind-set with regard to the
nature and worth of life itself that is the central question
confronting mankind. Failure to answer that question affirmatively
may leave us with a hell right here on earth.
The majority of
Planned Parenthood's abortion clinics are located in communities with
minority populations that exceed the city or state averages. Is this
a bizarre coincidence, or is it merely an extension of the eugenic
principles that seem to have driven Planned Parenthood's founder,
Margaret Sanger, a founder who is documented as saying, "We do
not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro
population." This statement, written in a 1939 letter to a
colleague, can be taken in one of two ways. Either she didn't want
the black community to wrongly assume that her efforts promoting
birth control were an attempt to eliminate them, or she didn't want
the black community to find out that this is exactly what she had in
mind. Planned Parenthood assumes the first; her opponents assume the
latter. Based on the greater context of her writings, the truth
likely lies in between. She probably didn't have in mind the
elimination of all blacks, but it is quite reasonable to infer that
she did want to keep them in submission and in line.
Whatever
the case may be, the bottom line is this. Margaret Sanger's vision of
social purification was rooted in birth control and sterilization.
Compared with abortion, these were minor threats to minority
communities. Planned Parenthood's contemporary vision of social
purification is much more menacing. No longer is the organization
driven by pregnancy prevention, it is now driven by pregnancy
elimination. We can debate the racial intent of Planned Parenthood
past and present, but we cannot debate the results. Abortion is by no
means an equal opportunity killer.
A NEW WRINKLE TO BE ADDED TO THIS
DID YOU KNOW THAT BILL GATES' FATHER WAS THE HEAD OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOR A TIMNE?
Read UP..
The Urgency of Population Issues
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated billions to the cause of improving global health, largely by sponsoring vaccine and agricultural programs in Third World countries. In an interview on the PBS program NOW with Bill Moyes (May 9, 2003), Moyes asked Gates how, given his background at Microsoft, he came to this champion this particular cause. Bill Gates responded:
The two areas that are changing in this amazing way are information technology and medical technology. Those are the things that the world will be very different 20 years from now than it is today.
I’m so excited about those advances. And they actually feed off of each other. The medical world uses the information tools to do their work. And so when you have those advances you think will they be available to everyone. [pause]
The one issue that really grabbed me as urgent were issues related to population… reproductive health.
Then he revealed that, for a time, his father, William H. Gates, Sr. was the head of Planned Parenthood.
Decreasing Population Through Better Health Care?
As did Sanger, Gates believes in the eugenist Thomas Malthus’s idea that the sustainability of the world’s resources is completely dependent upon maintaining population control. Ironically, Gates believes that improving health care, primarily through vaccinations, will accomplish this.
And maybe the most interesting thing I learned … is that, as you improve health in a society, population growth goes down.
You know…before I learned about it, I thought it was paradoxical. Well if you improve health, aren’t you just dooming people to deal with such a lack of resources where they won’t be educated or they won’t have enough food? You know, sort of a Malthusian view of what would take place.And the fact is that health leads parents to decide, “Okay, we don’t need to have as many children because the chance of having the less children being able to survive to be adults and take care of us, means we don’t have to have 7 or 8 children.” Now that was amazing. (Bill Gates, NOW interview).
Gates emphasizes vaccination programs as the best means of combating Third World poverty. However, as with birth control and The Negro Project, this exclusive focus on vaccines has raised some suspicion among the civic leadership. For example, in 2014, the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association and the Kenyan Catholic Bishops Conference issued a statement expressing concern that a UNICEF/WHO Tetanus vaccine was tainted with hCG, a contraceptive hormone. While this accusation has been denied by the agencies involved, the Catholic groups remain wary.
“Innovating to Zero”
Population control is also central to the issue of climate change, another of Gates’s passionate causes. In a talk titled, Innovating to Zero, presented at the 2010 Technology, Entertainment and Design (TED) Conference, Gates proposed a goal of achieving zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2050. He explained his mathematical formula by which that goal may be achieved.
CO2=Population x Services x Energy x Emissions.
So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero…[so]…Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
Noting that the first factor in the equation is population, Gates remarked:
The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.
To that end, since 2012, Melinda Gates, a Catholic, has pledged over a billion dollars from the Gates Foundation to support Family Planning 2020 (FP2020). She helps lead this international effort whose goal is to get birth control to 120 million more women by 2020. This despite strong objections from groups such as Culture of Life Africa who resent “the disturbing encroachment of the bold and wealthy proponents of the Culture of Death.”
“All Lives Have Equal Value”
It remains, even if well-intentioned, the activities of Bill and Melinda Gates, like Margaret Sanger, are in direct opposition to the teachings of the Catholic Church. As stated by Pope Francis In his encyclical, Laudato Si:
Instead of resolving the problems of the poor and thinking of how the world can be different, some can only propose a reduction in the birth rate. At times, developing countries face forms of international pressure which make economic assistance contingent on certain policies of “reproductive health”. Yet while it is true that an unequal distribution of the population and of available resources creates obstacles to development and a sustainable use of the environment, it must nonetheless be recognized that demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and shared development. To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. (50)
It is remarkable that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation webpage has as its slogan, “All Lives Have Equal Value.” Would that they and Margaret Sanger actually believed that was true.
Bill Gates’ father is William H. Gates Sr., a Co-Founder of Preston Gates & Ellis (they had offices across the United States and China). A prominent banker and lawyer, William H. Gates Sr. was also deeply involved with politics and “philanthropy”. In the era before Roe v. Wade, he sat on the board of Margret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood. https://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_gates.html
Why is that important? The Roe v. Wade case legalized abortion, but almost no body knows that legal abortion was a law formed by eugenicists, to “genetically improve” the population, by “reducing” the population.
In his book, ‘Vaccine-Nation: Poisoning the Population, One Shot at a Time’, Andreas Moritz, documented the very real eugenics connection between the Rockefeller Foundation (and family) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (and family). In it, He write this about them… “While launching the initiative called the Global Fund for Children’s Vaccines, Bill Gates had said in 2000, “It seems like every new corner we turn, the Rockefellers are already there. And in some cases, they have been there for a long, long time.”
Gates made that speech while announcing that his foundation was pledging $555 million to health programs across the globe.
I say ironic because the Rockefellers have been notorious in their funding of controversial research, dubbed by some as “genocidal”. This research concerns depopulation programs, communist and socialist programs, ‘mind control’ or behavioural modification experiments and the notoriously controversial experiments of Alfred Kinsey.
But the Gates and Rockefellers are old friends and partners in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI). The alliance, which controls major international vaccine programs, has the following as members: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations, UNISEF, World Bank, WHO, and many national governments.
In vaccine research, it doesn’t get bigger than this. I am detailing this to show just how incestuous the vaccine (and medical) world is. It also illustrates that power is concentrated in just a handful of [unelected] entities.” https://books.google.ca/books?id=zGWAwRZDnxUC&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109&dq=It+seems+like+every+new+corner+we+turn,+the+Rockefellers+are+already+there.+And+in+some+cases,+they+have+been+there+for+a+long,+long+time.%22&source=bl&ots=JVx2QiwRFZ&sig=ACfU3U2raoI_F2uZlD00k99yD6P-7KtS8A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3iZbP6IbpAhWKXM0KHbS0AD8Q6AEwAHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=It%20seems%20like%20every%20new%20corner%20we%20turn%2C%20the%20Rockefellers%20are%20already%20there.%20And%20in%20some%20cases%2C%20they%20have%20been%20there%20for%20a%20long%2C%20long%20time.%22&f=false
If you want to know exactly what those in the Rockefeller-financed eugenics movement think of the common, or “unfit” man, read the following statements made by Margret Sanger…
“But for my view, I believe that there should be no more babies.”
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
“We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population…”
“Eugenics without birth control seems to us a house builded [sic] upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit.”
“No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood.”
As a side note, in 2010, William H. Gates Sr. was also the face of a socialist (communist)-styled State Income Tax Initiative (Initiative 1098), in Washington State.
How do I know for certain, that Bill Gates’ dad is a secret communist (and globalist)? Well, in April of 2003, the Fabian Society, yet another Rockefeller-controlled (globalist) political “think thank”, whose original logo was a wolf in sheep’s clothing (but is a now a slow-moving turtle), wrote a report entitled, ‘Communities In Control’. In this report, it clearly shows a connection between William H. Gates Sr. and the Fabian Society. The report says the following… “In the Foreword to the report, Bill Gates Sr, father of the billionaire Microsoft founder Bill Gates, lends his support to the Fabian proposals and links them to the growing campaign in the United States against President Bush’s proposal to abolish US estate tax. The reform of inheritance tax is also analyzed here by experts including representatives of HM Treasury and the Irish Revenue.” https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2003/09/CommunitiesInControl.pdf
Isn’t that strange? The more we dig into those connected to William H. Gates Sr., the more that word (eugenics) keeps on popping up! But, what is the Fabian Society? Well, Geoffrey Robertson of The Guardian, wrote this about the Fabian Society, in a 2008 article; “Fabian socialists provided the intellectual justification for the eugenics policy that led to the stolen generations scandal.” Please, read the entire article, here. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/feb/14/australia
Along with pushing eugenics policies on the American people; for a century, the Fabians have also been pushing for, and to the dismay of many patriotic freedom-loving Americans, often succeeded in completely undermining Biblical values, the traditional family, property rights, and individual freedom! Their cause is anti-family, and anti-freedom; nothing good can come from their policies! The more one looks into the Fabians, the more treasonous, and evil they appear.
For example, Fabians pride themselves on infiltrating the most key and privileged positions in American society (UK and Canada as well), to flood the society with subversive pro-socialist, communist, and globalist propaganda, in a long-term effort to get the God-fearing, freedom-living American people, to abolish the Constitution of the United States of America “on their own”; and replace it, with a global system of oligarchical collectivism (a new world order). In the words of Bertrand Russell, a famous Fabian Socialist; “The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.”
In 1953, in The Impact of Science on Society (by Fabian Socialist), Bertrand Russell declared the following; “I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology….Various results will soon be arrived at: that the influence of home is obstructive….although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen….Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation. There are, however, two powerful forces opposed to such a policy: one is religion; the other is nationalism….A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government.”
Like father, like son, Bill Gates and his father, this article covers the history of eugenics on a deep level: https://www.raptureready.com/2020/12/29/bill-gates-his-father-and-eugenics-by-geri-ungurean/
When evidence is out there and even just common sense should prevail, . What can you do to show the black population that the Democrats aren’t going to help them and at worse are going to finance their depopulation. Sometimes you just have to figure these things out for yourself.
ReplyDelete