IF YOU HAVE NOT FIGURED THIS OUT.... YOU TOO ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. OPEN YOUR BRAIN TO LOGIC AND CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE!
SIMPLY PUT... FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL! IT LEADS TO ALL THE CROOKS IN THE OBAMA THUGMINISTRATION!
It’s been my contention since 2012 when the OBAMA NSA spied on "Old Pope Ratzinger" and Angela Merkel and Justice John Roberts and John Boehner and Romney and Ryan...that Obama and his gang of Thugs with the money and direction from The George Soros Organization... have been working to "Fundamentally Transform America" into a different country AND.. working with Hillary Clinton... "steal as much money as they could" along the way.
The FBI’s 2016 involvement in both the Hillary e-mail investigation and the Trump/Russia investigation were essentially political operations directed by the Obama White House to cover their tracks and also to be assured that WHEN Hillary Clinton won, the roles could be reversed and Obama could get the lions share of the spoils as did the Clinton Foundation and Hillary would look the other way as Obama did for Hillary. A prefect 16 year QUID PRO QUO arrangement. All the while performing on the Soros gang plan to Change America forever!
When Trump won.. they had to go to "Plan B" . He had the ability to expose everything. He the ability to EXPOSE the "WHY"
IF ANYONE DOES NOT SEE THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THIS PLAN.. YOU ARE SIMPLY PUT...
"AN IDIOT"!
I’ve argued that this represents a scandal worse than Watergate because we’re basically talking about the Obama Administration abusing federal law enforcement to achieve more than goals as the Watergate burglars sought by bugging the Democratic National Committee headquarters back in 1972. Nixon wanted to win... Obama was covering his tracks. The Trail is a lot more than a tactic to help Hillary because of his "Big Kenyan Heart"! He was not running so why was he helping Hillary ? THAT'S THE EASY QUESTION TO ANSWER !
ASK THE QUESTION "WHY"
Nixon’s people used two-bit criminals. Obama used the FBI. Obama’s offense is worse because he took what is supposed to be a non-political agency dedicated to the law and used it as a tool to let one candidate get away with a felony, while wiretapping and infiltrating the other under the thinly veiled guise of a legitimate criminal investigation.
.
ASK THE QUESTION "WHY"
The texts between the FBI’s Peter Strzok and Lisa Page more starkly point us in that direction:
With a standard criminal investigation undertaken by the FBI, there would be little to no involvement from the White House or from any other political entity. There may be cases that the White House would take an interest in and want to be briefed on, but everyone would understand that professional investigators would take the lead – if it’s really a matter of law and not politics.
The fact that they’re even having this conversation means, at the very least, someone in the Obama White House wants to be in charge of this, and the only conceivable reason for that is that the investigation is driven by politics and not by a legitimate question of law.
We’ve learned in recent days that the FBI likely planted a mole within the Trump campaign. There’s much speculation about the name of this individual, and while we’ve seen it, we won’t repeat it here until it’s confirmed. But this begs another question, doesn’t it? If the Obama White House was directing the FBI to investigate the Trump campaign for political reasons, and the FBI tapped a mole to infiltrate the Trump campaign, was the mole’s purpose to gather evidence for a criminal case or to relay campaign secrets that could then be shared with Hillary’s campaign?
In other words, did Obama direct the FBI to initiate a sham criminal investigation that included the infiltration of the Trump campaign, with the real purpose being to report back intelligence to the Clinton campaign? Because if he did, that’s an abuse of the FBI that’s more serious than what the Nixon campaign did when it broke into the Watergate and planted those listening devices.
And if that is what happened, then we know who Rod Rosenstein is trying to protect with his foot-dragging and stonewalling.
He’s trying to protect Barack Obama.
The presumption of the Obama White House was clearly that Hillary would win and none of this would ever see the light of day. When Trump shocked everyone by winning, all of this was suddenly at risk of exposure, and everything that’s happened since then has been for the purpose of covering it up.
By the way, what was the real purpose of that tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch? No one believes they were talking about grandchildren. Was Lynch there to brief Clinton on what the FBI’s mole had learned about the Trump campaign? Or about the FBI’s larger effort to sabotage Trump on Hillary’s behalf under the guise of a legitimate investigation?
I am still so angry that our Conservative Talking Heads like Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Carlson, Ingraham and all the other LEVEL 2 Conservative Politicos do not have the common sense or the Courage to LAY IT OUT FOR YOU!/
HERE IT IS.
THEN THERE IS THE IRAN DEAL...
Obama through John Kerry got kick backs from Iran.. Here is the proof
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=7598305043466213826#editor/target=post;postID=4806771864830024987;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=5;src=postname
MAY 23rd, 2020
UPDATE..
THE RECENTLY DECLASSIFIED INFO FROM THE DOJ, RELEASED BY ACTING DNI RICK GRENNEL PROVES WHAT I KNEW ALL ALONG!!
THE OBAMA THUGMINISTRATION WAS SPYING ON TRUMP TO REMOVE HIM.... AND YES IT WAS A COUP.
This is Sedition and by Law Seditionists should be HUNG FOR TREASON!
SIMPLY PUT... FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL! IT LEADS TO ALL THE CROOKS IN THE OBAMA THUGMINISTRATION!
It’s been my contention since 2012 when the OBAMA NSA spied on "Old Pope Ratzinger" and Angela Merkel and Justice John Roberts and John Boehner and Romney and Ryan...that Obama and his gang of Thugs with the money and direction from The George Soros Organization... have been working to "Fundamentally Transform America" into a different country AND.. working with Hillary Clinton... "steal as much money as they could" along the way.
The FBI’s 2016 involvement in both the Hillary e-mail investigation and the Trump/Russia investigation were essentially political operations directed by the Obama White House to cover their tracks and also to be assured that WHEN Hillary Clinton won, the roles could be reversed and Obama could get the lions share of the spoils as did the Clinton Foundation and Hillary would look the other way as Obama did for Hillary. A prefect 16 year QUID PRO QUO arrangement. All the while performing on the Soros gang plan to Change America forever!
When Trump won.. they had to go to "Plan B" . He had the ability to expose everything. He the ability to EXPOSE the "WHY"
IF ANYONE DOES NOT SEE THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THIS PLAN.. YOU ARE SIMPLY PUT...
"AN IDIOT"!
I’ve argued that this represents a scandal worse than Watergate because we’re basically talking about the Obama Administration abusing federal law enforcement to achieve more than goals as the Watergate burglars sought by bugging the Democratic National Committee headquarters back in 1972. Nixon wanted to win... Obama was covering his tracks. The Trail is a lot more than a tactic to help Hillary because of his "Big Kenyan Heart"! He was not running so why was he helping Hillary ? THAT'S THE EASY QUESTION TO ANSWER !
ASK THE QUESTION "WHY"
Nixon’s people used two-bit criminals. Obama used the FBI. Obama’s offense is worse because he took what is supposed to be a non-political agency dedicated to the law and used it as a tool to let one candidate get away with a felony, while wiretapping and infiltrating the other under the thinly veiled guise of a legitimate criminal investigation.
.
ASK THE QUESTION "WHY"
Yet most of the coverage of this story, even in conservative
media, has not focused on one element of the story that strikes me as
increasingly obvious: All of the redactions, stonewalling and
excuse-making are for the purpose of doing one thing: Protecting Barack
Obama by hiding the fact that he was driving this whole thing.ASK THE QUESTION "WHY"
On the afternoon of August 5, Strzok and Page engaged in a tense conversation which involved an imminent meeting with “agency people” — an apparent reference to the CIA. Strzok suggested that, for the new case, they should conduct Monday, Wednesday, and Friday morning meetings “with [REDACTED]” just “like we did with mye” — Mid Year Exam, the Clinton probe.
Finally, after some back-and-forth over who should be invited to a major meeting about the new case, a meeting was held. In the aftermath, at about 4:30 p.m., Strzok and Page had the following exchange:
Strzok: And hi. Went well, best we could have expected. Other than [REDACTED] quote: “the White House is running this.” My answer, “well, maybe for you they are.” And of course, I was planning on telling this guy, thanks for coming, we’ve got an hour, but with Bill [Priestap] there, I’ve got no control….
Page: Yeah, whatever (re the WH comment). We’ve got the emails that say otherwise.
It would be interesting to know what is in the emails that apparently clarify how the Obama administration divided responsibility for running the Trump-Russia investigation. Just like it would be interesting to know what is behind all the many redactions in these texts about how and why the Trump-Russia investigation got started.
DO YOU GET IT PEOPLE..ASK THE QUESTION "WHY"
Do note that Strzok and Page are furiously pushing back on the
idea that the White House is running the investigation, but that’s
immaterial. What we clearly see here is that there’s a power struggle
for who is going to be in control of it, and there’s at least someone –
because of the redactions, we don’t yet know who – who is trying to
assert to Strzok that the White House is in the driver’s seat.
You
can argue if you want that Page’s response casts doubt on my premise.
But if you really think about it, you have to know that’s disingenuous.With a standard criminal investigation undertaken by the FBI, there would be little to no involvement from the White House or from any other political entity. There may be cases that the White House would take an interest in and want to be briefed on, but everyone would understand that professional investigators would take the lead – if it’s really a matter of law and not politics.
The fact that they’re even having this conversation means, at the very least, someone in the Obama White House wants to be in charge of this, and the only conceivable reason for that is that the investigation is driven by politics and not by a legitimate question of law.
We’ve learned in recent days that the FBI likely planted a mole within the Trump campaign. There’s much speculation about the name of this individual, and while we’ve seen it, we won’t repeat it here until it’s confirmed. But this begs another question, doesn’t it? If the Obama White House was directing the FBI to investigate the Trump campaign for political reasons, and the FBI tapped a mole to infiltrate the Trump campaign, was the mole’s purpose to gather evidence for a criminal case or to relay campaign secrets that could then be shared with Hillary’s campaign?
In other words, did Obama direct the FBI to initiate a sham criminal investigation that included the infiltration of the Trump campaign, with the real purpose being to report back intelligence to the Clinton campaign? Because if he did, that’s an abuse of the FBI that’s more serious than what the Nixon campaign did when it broke into the Watergate and planted those listening devices.
And if that is what happened, then we know who Rod Rosenstein is trying to protect with his foot-dragging and stonewalling.
He’s trying to protect Barack Obama.
The presumption of the Obama White House was clearly that Hillary would win and none of this would ever see the light of day. When Trump shocked everyone by winning, all of this was suddenly at risk of exposure, and everything that’s happened since then has been for the purpose of covering it up.
By the way, what was the real purpose of that tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch? No one believes they were talking about grandchildren. Was Lynch there to brief Clinton on what the FBI’s mole had learned about the Trump campaign? Or about the FBI’s larger effort to sabotage Trump on Hillary’s behalf under the guise of a legitimate investigation?
ONCE YOU READ THIS YOU WILL UNDERSTAND HOW OBAMA AND THE CLINTONS AND ALL THE FBI AND DOJ CROOKS ARE CONNECTED.
I HAVE CONNECTED THE DOTS AND EVERYTHING MAKES SENSE NOW!
Please read and share this so our Political Pundits have clarity about the REASON WHY THE ALPHABET AGENCIES WORKED TO PROTECT OBAMA AND HILLARY!
I HAVE CONNECTED THE DOTS AND EVERYTHING MAKES SENSE NOW!
Please read and share this so our Political Pundits have clarity about the REASON WHY THE ALPHABET AGENCIES WORKED TO PROTECT OBAMA AND HILLARY!
I am still so angry that our Conservative Talking Heads like Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Carlson, Ingraham and all the other LEVEL 2 Conservative Politicos do not have the common sense or the Courage to LAY IT OUT FOR YOU!/
HERE IT IS.
Understand why Robert Mueller and his gang of Enforcers moved
forward working on "Obstruction of Justice" and not "Russia Collusion"
and why they are working feverishly to beat the clock. If there was no Collusion or Obstruction... the whole "shit and Kaboodle" is going to expose the plot. The 2 pronged plot.
Prong A... "Fundamentally Transform America"
Prong B... " Steal a Boatload of Money along the way"
Its the Banana Republic way!
Prong A... "Fundamentally Transform America"
Prong B... " Steal a Boatload of Money along the way"
Its the Banana Republic way!
Let me lay it out for you! The FBI and THE DOJ bosses like Comey and Lynch and Mueller and others are just "Level 2" Soldiers. Paid Mercenaries doing the work and getting paid well for their work. None of them have a past history of any rabid political ideology. So ask your self WHY they did it? MONEY.
Search through my blog and I have detailed exposes of Comey and Mueller and Rosenstein and others. Read through it and you will understand the "WHY"
Search through my blog and I have detailed exposes of Comey and Mueller and Rosenstein and others. Read through it and you will understand the "WHY"
The
obvious fact is that Obama and his Crooked Cabinet and enforcers were
getting a cut of money from every deal that went down in America.
.. From Clinton Foundation where they were paid to look the other way
.. From Green Energy deals make to his lefty Pals
.. From Iran for the "Money Pallet"
.. From Uranium One Deal to look the other way
.. From the Bowe Berghdahl deal
Look,
Obama lied that he knew nothing about the Clinton Server.. when he was
actually communicating with her USING A BOGUS FAKE NAME ON THAT SAME
SERVER!
ASK YOUR SELF WHY ! WHY YOU THINK ?
He did not even like the Bitch. Its because he liked the money he collected!
Loretta Lynch was on Clinton's email server too .. WITH HER BOGUS NAME !
Dig deep into those 30,000 lost emails and you will find that Comey, Strzok, Holder, Biden, Kerry were all there on that Server with Bogus names! There was a plan hatched and the communication was on burner phones and Hillary's email server.
ASK YOUR SELF WHY ! WHY YOU THINK ?
He did not even like the Bitch. Its because he liked the money he collected!
Loretta Lynch was on Clinton's email server too .. WITH HER BOGUS NAME !
Dig deep into those 30,000 lost emails and you will find that Comey, Strzok, Holder, Biden, Kerry were all there on that Server with Bogus names! There was a plan hatched and the communication was on burner phones and Hillary's email server.
Yes..
and many more. Now it was not just Obama who was on the take. He
"spread the money and the crime loot" around. By giving crooks like
Comey and Mueller and Holder and Lynch and Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes and
Kerry and Biden.. Valerie Jarrett made sure no one would squeal. They
all were Dirty!
When
the election cycle began, they went to work to make sure Hillary would
win the elections. They rigged it every way they could. They were making
sure that none of this Skimming and Racketeering would ever be exposed.
All for one and one for all.
If
Hillary won the Statute of Limitations may have run out before they got
caught. If Hillary won they would have Loretta Lynch back as head of
DOJ. She was on the take so.. she was not going to investigate or squeal
right? No she would not even investigate! Matter of fact she was the
First Attorney General in History to plead the 5th when questioned about
some of this.
But
the polls had them scared a bit .. they needed the paid goons at the
FBI like Comey and Strzok and the "Level 2 Guys" at the DOJ like
Rosenstein and Sally Yates to be ready for the “Insurance Policy” move.
The “Hail Mary” in the unlikely even that Trump won.
WELL TRUMP WON.. by a razor thin margin of WORKING BLUE COLLAR VOTES IN KEY STATES.
So now… they were in trouble. They were into the first stages of PLAN B.
Plan
B was to start a story about Russia Collusion. It was set up by John
Podesta and The Clinton Gang with the help of Ben Rhodes as a liaison
from the Obama Gang. They were looking to get FISA warrants on Trump
Campaign. They wanted something they could use to Frame Trump. Russia
“Collusion” seemed a great ploy They could listen in on every call and
find something to put on Trump.
Here is the SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR FAKE FISA WARRANTS AND WHY THEY DID IT!.
THIS WAS DONE WITH A DISTINCT PURPOSE. TO PROTECT THE CRIMES OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION FROM BEING EXPOSED AND BEING PROSECUTED !
Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent;
Then, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump)
and so, third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump.
Who were involved in this ALONG WITH OBAMA ?
1. John Brennan
2. James Clapper
3. Ben Rhodes
4. Susan Rice
5. Samantha Powers
6. James Comey
7. Andrew McCabe
8. Peter Strzok
9. James Ohr
10. Sally Yates
11. Rod Rosenstein
and some others.
They did it because the Obama Cabal has been skimming money from every deal that the Clinton Foundation had been scamming, and also had their own rackets going on like the Iran Money Pallet, the Green Energy Kick Backs, The Cash for Clunker Kick Backs etc etc.
If Hillary lost then the jig was up. Their Criminal Enterprise would be exposed. Trump said if he won Hillary "was Going to Jail" Remember?
When Trump won.. their worst fears would be realized. That whole list of folks we er paid off to work with the Obama Gang. They were all exposed and so the "Soft Coup" was executed.
YOU HAVE TO REALIZE THEY KNOW THAT TRUMP MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE THEY COUNTRY GETS TO THE TRUTH. PLAN B WAS EXECUTED
Here is the SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR FAKE FISA WARRANTS AND WHY THEY DID IT!.
THIS WAS DONE WITH A DISTINCT PURPOSE. TO PROTECT THE CRIMES OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION FROM BEING EXPOSED AND BEING PROSECUTED !
Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent;
Then, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump)
and so, third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump.
Who were involved in this ALONG WITH OBAMA ?
1. John Brennan
2. James Clapper
3. Ben Rhodes
4. Susan Rice
5. Samantha Powers
6. James Comey
7. Andrew McCabe
8. Peter Strzok
9. James Ohr
10. Sally Yates
11. Rod Rosenstein
and some others.
They did it because the Obama Cabal has been skimming money from every deal that the Clinton Foundation had been scamming, and also had their own rackets going on like the Iran Money Pallet, the Green Energy Kick Backs, The Cash for Clunker Kick Backs etc etc.
If Hillary lost then the jig was up. Their Criminal Enterprise would be exposed. Trump said if he won Hillary "was Going to Jail" Remember?
When Trump won.. their worst fears would be realized. That whole list of folks we er paid off to work with the Obama Gang. They were all exposed and so the "Soft Coup" was executed.
YOU HAVE TO REALIZE THEY KNOW THAT TRUMP MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE THEY COUNTRY GETS TO THE TRUTH. PLAN B WAS EXECUTED
Plan
B included the members of the FBI Mafia. The paid Goons we have heard
about recently. They went about trying to discredit Trump through the
Russia Collusion angle. They worked on it hard. It was not working
They
got Jeff Sessions to recuse himself so Rosenstein who is a member of
the Justice Mafia to take over when Sally Yates was exposed and fired.
Plan B had many layers.
With
Rosenstein as Acting AG and Comey as FBI hold Over Director, behind the
scenes things were falling into place UNTIL Comey got fired. That is
because Admiral Rogers had tipped off the Trump Campaign about Comey’s
Gang Snooping on Trump Campaign.
When Comey got fired plan B had a secondary trigger. Get Mueller in as Special Counsel.
Mueller
now was tasked to show “some form of Russia Collusion” The Lefty Media
Dogs and the Useful Idiot Congress were pressed into the battle to find
some Collusion.
But
11 months of looking found nothing. But what it also did is that it got
the Conservatives ACTIVE and they started their own investigations.
What they found was even more dastardly. They found that America was
being run by a Political Mafia tasked with making sure that Obama’s
Corrupt Government did not get exposed and that Hillary would win.
The
more they tried to hide it the more that got exposed. This was getting
to be a time of extreme anxiety for the Justice Mafia. They were paid to
derail the Administration of a duly elected President and they were
failing. Russia Collusion did not exist but FBI and Democrat Operative
Collusion DID exist. It was being exposed.
So
Robert Mueller turned his focus from "Russia Collusion" to “Obstruction
of Justice” and maybe look into some past Financial Deals that Trump
may have done. It is very possible that as a Business man he may not
have been working to the exact letter of the Law. As a Businessman I am
sure there must be something a Billionaire has done that can be
construed as “irregular or even illegal”. But that was not the reason
for the Special Counsel. It was about Russia Collusion. But they press
on.
So why are they pursuing Trump now ?
YOU HAVE TO REALIZE THEY HAVE TO STOP TRUMP BEFORE THE COUNTRY GETS TO THE TRUTH.
THE
TRUTH WILL UNRAVEL ALL THE GAINS THE SOCIALIST OLIGARCH HAVE MADE TO
MAKE AMERICA A SOCIALIST OLIGOPOLY. IT WILL BE DESTROYED IF OBAMA AND
THE HENCHMAN ARE EXPOSED.
So
you see…there are two tracks with two trains roaring down parallel
rails. Down the road they will converge to one set of tracks...
Who gets there first will determine where America will be 2 years from now!
They
are trying to get something on Trump with regards to Obstruction of
Justice or… Some Financial Deal that they can lay on him.. AND OFFER HIM
A COMPROMISE..
The Compromise will be that his Administration LAY OFF ALL THE OBAMA CLINTON INVESTIGATIONS AND THEY LAY OFF HIM
THERE WILL BE A TARMAC MEETING OF SOME SORT.
I
FEAR THAT NO ONE WILL BE PROSECUTED AND THE LEFTY THUGS WILL WIN ACCEPT
THE LOSS OF THIS ROUND AND WAIT FOR TRUMP TO LOSE IN 2020 AND THEN THE
WILL CONTINUE WITH THEIR PLAN TO DISMANTLE AMERICA!
I AM A MAN WHO TRIES TO PEER OVER THE HORIZON. THIS IS WHAT I SEE!
What are your thought Patriots ?
regards
John Gaultier
PS.
This plan to "FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA" BEGAN in 2008 when Obama Stole The elections. Read how on my other blog!
Had Hillary won they would have 16 years to dismantle America as we know it.. but also become the TWO RICHEST FAMILIES IN THE WORLD. THE CLINTONS AND THE OBAMAS.
That was the Ultimate Plan. Not some Lofty Ideology. It was all about MONEY. IT ALWAYS IS!
John Gaultier
PS.
This plan to "FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA" BEGAN in 2008 when Obama Stole The elections. Read how on my other blog!
Had Hillary won they would have 16 years to dismantle America as we know it.. but also become the TWO RICHEST FAMILIES IN THE WORLD. THE CLINTONS AND THE OBAMAS.
That was the Ultimate Plan. Not some Lofty Ideology. It was all about MONEY. IT ALWAYS IS!
THEN THERE IS THE IRAN DEAL...
Obama through John Kerry got kick backs from Iran.. Here is the proof
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=7598305043466213826#editor/target=post;postID=4806771864830024987;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=5;src=postname
MAY 23rd, 2020
UPDATE..
THE RECENTLY DECLASSIFIED INFO FROM THE DOJ, RELEASED BY ACTING DNI RICK GRENNEL PROVES WHAT I KNEW ALL ALONG!!
THE OBAMA THUGMINISTRATION WAS SPYING ON TRUMP TO REMOVE HIM.... AND YES IT WAS A COUP.
This is Sedition and by Law Seditionists should be HUNG FOR TREASON!
Obama, Biden Oval Office Meeting On January 5 Was Key To Entire Anti-Trump Operation
Look you can understand why a Paid Lackey like Susan Rice would write that bizarre Inauguration Day email about
that meeting. It helps to explain the campaign of leaks, lies, and obstruction
that has been goinbg on since they began spying in the early days of this THUGMINISTRATION ( As I call it! ).
Information released in the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss
the case it brought against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn confirms the
significance of a January 5, 2017, meeting at the Obama White House. It
was at this meeting that Obama gave guidance to key officials who would
be tasked with protecting his administration’s utilization of secretly
funded Clinton campaign research, which alleged Trump was involved in a
treasonous plot to collude with Russia, from being discovered or stopped
by the incoming administration.
“President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia,” National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote in an unusual email to herself about the meeting that was also attended by Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director James Comey, and Vice President Joe Biden.
A clearer picture is emerging of the drastic steps that were taken to accomplish Obama’s goal in the following weeks and months. Shortly thereafter, high-level operatives began intensely leaking selective information supporting a supposed Russia-Trump conspiracy theory, the incoming National Security Advisor was ambushed, and the incoming Attorney General was forced to recuse himself from oversight of investigations of President Trump. At each major point in the operation, explosive media leaks were a key strategy in the operation to take down Trump.
Not only was information on Russia not fully shared with the incoming Trump team, as Obama directs, the leaks and ambushes made the transition chaotic, scared quality individuals away from working in the administration, made effective governance almost impossible, and materially damaged national security. When Comey was finally fired on May 9, in part for his duplicitousness regarding his handling of the Russia collusion theory, he orchestrated the launch of a Special Counsel probe that continued his efforts for another two years. That probe ended with Mueller finding no evidence of any American colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election, much less Trump or anyone connected to him.
An analysis of the timeline from early 2017 shows a clear pattern of behavior from the federal officials running the collusion operation against the Trump campaign. It also shows how essential media leaks were to their strategy to sideline key law enforcement and intelligence officials and cripple the ability of the incoming Trump administration to run the country.
Here’s a timeline of the key moments and news articles of the efforts, per Obama’s direction, to prevent the Trump administration from learning about the FBI’s operation against it.
January 4: Following the closure of a pretextually dubious and politically motivated FBI investigation of Flynn at the beginning of January, the leadership of the FBI scrambled to reopen a case against Flynn, the man who in his role as National Security Advisor would have to review their Russia collusion investigation. FBI officials openly discussed their concern about briefing the veteran intelligence official on what they had done to the Trump campaign and transition team and what they were planning to do to the incoming Trump administration. Flynn had to be dealt with. The FBI’s top counterintelligence official would later memorialize discussions about the FBI’s attempts to “get [Flynn] fired.” No reopening was needed, they determined, when they discovered they had failed to close the previous investigation. They found this mistake “amazing” and “serendipitously good” and said “our utter incompetence actually helps us.” Even more noteworthy were texts from FBI’s #2 counterintelligence official Peter Strzok to FBI lawyer Lisa Page noting that the “7th floor,” a reference to Comey and his deputy director Andrew McCabe, was running the show.
January 5: Yates, Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper briefed Obama on Russia-related matters in the Oval Office. Biden and Rice also attended. After the Obama briefing, the intelligence chiefs who would be leaving at the end of the term were dismissed and Yates and Comey, who would continue in the Trump administration, were asked to stay. Not only did Obama give his guidance about how to perpetuate the Russia collusion theory investigations, he also talked about Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to both Comey and Yates. Interestingly, Clapper, Comey, and Yates all said that they did not brief Obama about these phone calls. Clapper testified he did not brief Obama on the calls, Yates learned about the calls from Obama himself during that meeting, and Comey also testified he didn’t brief Obama about the calls, even though the intelligence was an FBI product. Rice, who publicly lied but later admitted under oath to her widespread use of unmasked intelligence at the end of the Obama administration, likely briefed Obama on the calls and would have had access to the intelligence. Comey mentions the Logan Act at this meeting.
It was this meeting that Rice memorialized in a bizarre inauguration-day email to herself that claimed Obama told the gathered to do everything “by the book.” But Rice also noted in her email that the key point of discussion in that meeting was whether and how to withhold national security information, likely including details of the investigation into Trump himself, from the incoming Trump national security team.
January 6: An ostensibly similar briefing about Russian interference efforts during the 2016 campaign was given to President-elect Trump. After that briefing, Comey privately briefed Trump on the most salacious and absurd “pee tape” allegation in the Christopher Steele dossier, a document the FBI had already used to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump campaign affiliate Carter Page. Comey told Trump he was telling him because CNN was looking for any reason it could find to publish a story about Russia having compromising information on him, and he wanted to warn Trump about it. He did not mention the dossier was completely unverified or that it was the product of a secretly funded operation by the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee.
January 10: In an amazing coincidence, CNN found the excuse to publish the Russia claims after a high-level Obama intelligence operative leaked that Comey had briefed Trump about the dossier. This selective leak, which was credulously accepted by CNN reporters Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto, Jake Tapper and Carl Bernstein, may have been the most important step in the operation to harm the incoming Trump administration. The leak of the briefing of Trump was used to legitimize a ridiculous dossier full of allegations the FBI knew to be false that multiple news organizations had previously refused to report on for lack of substantiation, and created a cloud of suspicion over Trump’s campaign and administration by insinuating he was being blackmailed by Russia.
January 12: The next part of the strategy was the explosive leak to David Ignatius of the Washington Post to legitimize the use against Flynn of the Logan Act, a likely unconstitutional 1799 law prohibiting private individuals, not public incoming national security advisors, from discussing foreign policy with foreign governments. Ignatius accepted the leak from the Obama official. He wrote that Flynn had called Kislyak. “What did Flynn say, and did it undercut the U.S. sanctions? The Logan Act (though never enforced) bars U.S. citizens from correspondence intending to influence a foreign government about ‘disputes’ with the United States. Was its spirit violated?” Flynn’s routine and appropriate phone call became fodder for a developing grand conspiracy theory of Russia collusion. In discussions with investigators, both DOJ’s Mary McCord and Comey conspicuously cite this Ignatius column as somehow meaningful in the approach they would take with Flynn. “Nothing, to my mind, happens until the 13th of January, when David Ignatius publishes a column that contains a reference to communication Michael Flynn had with the Russians. That was on the 13th of January,” Comey said of the column that ran online on January 12. In fact, quite a bit had happened at the FBI prior to that leak, with much conversation about how to utilize the Logan Act against Flynn. And the leak-fueled Ignatius column would later be used by FBI officials to justify an illegal ambush interview of Flynn in the White House.
January 23: Another important criminal leak was given to Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller of the Washington Post, also based on criminal leaks. Their article, headlined “FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit,” was intended to make Flynn feel safe and put him at ease about the FBI stance on those calls the day before they planned to ambush him in an interview. The article was used to publicize false information when it said, “Although Flynn’s contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were listened to, Flynn himself is not the active target of an investigation, U.S. officials said.” In fact, emails prior to this date confirm Flynn was their prime target. This article was later cited by McCabe as the reason why they were justified in concealing from Flynn the real purpose of their interview. Flynn later asked McCabe if he knew how all the information about his phone calls had been made public and whether it had been leaked. Any potential response from McCabe to Flynn has been redacted from his own notes about the conversation.
January 24: Comey later admitted he broke every protocol to send agents to interview Flynn and try to catch him in a lie. FBI officials strategized how to keep Flynn from knowing he was a target of the investigation or asking for an attorney to represent him in the interview. The January 23 Washington Post article, which falsely stated that Flynn was not an FBI target, was key to that strategy. Though the interviewing agents said they could detect no “tells” indicating he lied, and he carefully phrased everything in the interview, he later was induced to plead guilty to lying in this interview. Ostensibly because White House officials downplayed the Kislyak phone calls, presumably in light of what Flynn had told them about the calls, Yates would go to the White House the next day and insinuate Flynn should probably be fired.
February 9: The strategy to get Flynn fired didn’t immediately work so another leak was deployed to Greg Miller, Adam Entous and Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post. That article, headline “National security adviser Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador, despite denials, officials say,” was sourced to people who happened to share senior FBI leadership’s views on the Logan Act. This article was also based on criminal leaks of top secret information of phone call intercepts and laid out the FBI’s case for why Flynn’s contacts with a foreign adversary were a problem. The fact that such phone calls are routine, not to mention Flynn’s case that improved relations with Russia in a world where China, North Korea, and Iran were posing increasing threats, never made it into these articles for context.
February 13: The operation finally succeeded in getting Flynn fired and rendering him unable to review the operations against the Trump campaign, Trump transition team, and Trump administration.
March 1: Flynn was the first obstacle who had to be overcome. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was the next. The Trump loyalist with a strong Department of Justice background would also need to be briefed on the anti-Trump efforts unless he could be sidelined. Comey admitted that early in Sessions’ tenure, he deliberately hid Russia-related information from Sessions because, “it made little sense to report it to Attorney General Sessions, who we expected would likely recuse himself from involvement in Russia-related investigations.” To secure that recusal, yet another leak was deployed to the Washington Post’s Adam Entous, Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller. The leak was intended to tar Sessions as a secret Russian agent and was dramatically spun as “Sessions Spoke Twice To Russian Envoy: Revelation contradicts his testimony at confirmation hearing.” One meeting was in passing and the other was in his function as a United States Senator, but the hysteria was such that the Post authors could get away with suggesting Sessions was too compromised to oversee the Department of Justice’s counterintelligence operations involving Russia. It is perhaps worth noting that the Special Counsel idea was pushed in this article.
March 2: Sessions recused himself from oversight of the FBI’s anti-Trump operation, providing no meaningful oversight to an operation that would be spun into a Special Counsel by mid-May. With the removal of Trump’s National Security Advisor and his Attorney General, there was no longer any chance of Trump loyalists discovering what Obama holdovers at the FBI were actually doing to get Trump thrown out of office. After Trump fired Comey for managerial incompetence on May 9, deceptively edited and misleading leaks to the New York Times ordered by Comey himself were used to gin up a Special Counsel run exclusively by left-wing anti-Trump partisans who continued the operation without any meaningful oversight for another two years.
This stunning operation was not just a typical battle between political foes, nor merely an example of media bias against political enemies. Instead, this entire operation was a deliberate and direct attack on the foundation of American governance. In light of the newly declassified documents released in recent days, it is clear that understanding what happened in that January 5 Oval Office meeting is essential to understanding the full scope and breadth of the corrupt operation against the Trump administration. It is long past time for lawmakers in Congress who are actually interested in oversight of the federal government and the media to demand answers about what really happened in that meeting from every single participant, including Obama and Biden.
More to come.. but you get the picture... now they are trying to Cover their crooked tracks.
“President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia,” National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote in an unusual email to herself about the meeting that was also attended by Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director James Comey, and Vice President Joe Biden.
A clearer picture is emerging of the drastic steps that were taken to accomplish Obama’s goal in the following weeks and months. Shortly thereafter, high-level operatives began intensely leaking selective information supporting a supposed Russia-Trump conspiracy theory, the incoming National Security Advisor was ambushed, and the incoming Attorney General was forced to recuse himself from oversight of investigations of President Trump. At each major point in the operation, explosive media leaks were a key strategy in the operation to take down Trump.
Not only was information on Russia not fully shared with the incoming Trump team, as Obama directs, the leaks and ambushes made the transition chaotic, scared quality individuals away from working in the administration, made effective governance almost impossible, and materially damaged national security. When Comey was finally fired on May 9, in part for his duplicitousness regarding his handling of the Russia collusion theory, he orchestrated the launch of a Special Counsel probe that continued his efforts for another two years. That probe ended with Mueller finding no evidence of any American colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election, much less Trump or anyone connected to him.
An analysis of the timeline from early 2017 shows a clear pattern of behavior from the federal officials running the collusion operation against the Trump campaign. It also shows how essential media leaks were to their strategy to sideline key law enforcement and intelligence officials and cripple the ability of the incoming Trump administration to run the country.
Here’s a timeline of the key moments and news articles of the efforts, per Obama’s direction, to prevent the Trump administration from learning about the FBI’s operation against it.
January 4: Following the closure of a pretextually dubious and politically motivated FBI investigation of Flynn at the beginning of January, the leadership of the FBI scrambled to reopen a case against Flynn, the man who in his role as National Security Advisor would have to review their Russia collusion investigation. FBI officials openly discussed their concern about briefing the veteran intelligence official on what they had done to the Trump campaign and transition team and what they were planning to do to the incoming Trump administration. Flynn had to be dealt with. The FBI’s top counterintelligence official would later memorialize discussions about the FBI’s attempts to “get [Flynn] fired.” No reopening was needed, they determined, when they discovered they had failed to close the previous investigation. They found this mistake “amazing” and “serendipitously good” and said “our utter incompetence actually helps us.” Even more noteworthy were texts from FBI’s #2 counterintelligence official Peter Strzok to FBI lawyer Lisa Page noting that the “7th floor,” a reference to Comey and his deputy director Andrew McCabe, was running the show.
January 5: Yates, Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper briefed Obama on Russia-related matters in the Oval Office. Biden and Rice also attended. After the Obama briefing, the intelligence chiefs who would be leaving at the end of the term were dismissed and Yates and Comey, who would continue in the Trump administration, were asked to stay. Not only did Obama give his guidance about how to perpetuate the Russia collusion theory investigations, he also talked about Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to both Comey and Yates. Interestingly, Clapper, Comey, and Yates all said that they did not brief Obama about these phone calls. Clapper testified he did not brief Obama on the calls, Yates learned about the calls from Obama himself during that meeting, and Comey also testified he didn’t brief Obama about the calls, even though the intelligence was an FBI product. Rice, who publicly lied but later admitted under oath to her widespread use of unmasked intelligence at the end of the Obama administration, likely briefed Obama on the calls and would have had access to the intelligence. Comey mentions the Logan Act at this meeting.
It was this meeting that Rice memorialized in a bizarre inauguration-day email to herself that claimed Obama told the gathered to do everything “by the book.” But Rice also noted in her email that the key point of discussion in that meeting was whether and how to withhold national security information, likely including details of the investigation into Trump himself, from the incoming Trump national security team.
January 6: An ostensibly similar briefing about Russian interference efforts during the 2016 campaign was given to President-elect Trump. After that briefing, Comey privately briefed Trump on the most salacious and absurd “pee tape” allegation in the Christopher Steele dossier, a document the FBI had already used to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump campaign affiliate Carter Page. Comey told Trump he was telling him because CNN was looking for any reason it could find to publish a story about Russia having compromising information on him, and he wanted to warn Trump about it. He did not mention the dossier was completely unverified or that it was the product of a secretly funded operation by the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee.
January 10: In an amazing coincidence, CNN found the excuse to publish the Russia claims after a high-level Obama intelligence operative leaked that Comey had briefed Trump about the dossier. This selective leak, which was credulously accepted by CNN reporters Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto, Jake Tapper and Carl Bernstein, may have been the most important step in the operation to harm the incoming Trump administration. The leak of the briefing of Trump was used to legitimize a ridiculous dossier full of allegations the FBI knew to be false that multiple news organizations had previously refused to report on for lack of substantiation, and created a cloud of suspicion over Trump’s campaign and administration by insinuating he was being blackmailed by Russia.
January 12: The next part of the strategy was the explosive leak to David Ignatius of the Washington Post to legitimize the use against Flynn of the Logan Act, a likely unconstitutional 1799 law prohibiting private individuals, not public incoming national security advisors, from discussing foreign policy with foreign governments. Ignatius accepted the leak from the Obama official. He wrote that Flynn had called Kislyak. “What did Flynn say, and did it undercut the U.S. sanctions? The Logan Act (though never enforced) bars U.S. citizens from correspondence intending to influence a foreign government about ‘disputes’ with the United States. Was its spirit violated?” Flynn’s routine and appropriate phone call became fodder for a developing grand conspiracy theory of Russia collusion. In discussions with investigators, both DOJ’s Mary McCord and Comey conspicuously cite this Ignatius column as somehow meaningful in the approach they would take with Flynn. “Nothing, to my mind, happens until the 13th of January, when David Ignatius publishes a column that contains a reference to communication Michael Flynn had with the Russians. That was on the 13th of January,” Comey said of the column that ran online on January 12. In fact, quite a bit had happened at the FBI prior to that leak, with much conversation about how to utilize the Logan Act against Flynn. And the leak-fueled Ignatius column would later be used by FBI officials to justify an illegal ambush interview of Flynn in the White House.
January 23: Another important criminal leak was given to Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller of the Washington Post, also based on criminal leaks. Their article, headlined “FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit,” was intended to make Flynn feel safe and put him at ease about the FBI stance on those calls the day before they planned to ambush him in an interview. The article was used to publicize false information when it said, “Although Flynn’s contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were listened to, Flynn himself is not the active target of an investigation, U.S. officials said.” In fact, emails prior to this date confirm Flynn was their prime target. This article was later cited by McCabe as the reason why they were justified in concealing from Flynn the real purpose of their interview. Flynn later asked McCabe if he knew how all the information about his phone calls had been made public and whether it had been leaked. Any potential response from McCabe to Flynn has been redacted from his own notes about the conversation.
January 24: Comey later admitted he broke every protocol to send agents to interview Flynn and try to catch him in a lie. FBI officials strategized how to keep Flynn from knowing he was a target of the investigation or asking for an attorney to represent him in the interview. The January 23 Washington Post article, which falsely stated that Flynn was not an FBI target, was key to that strategy. Though the interviewing agents said they could detect no “tells” indicating he lied, and he carefully phrased everything in the interview, he later was induced to plead guilty to lying in this interview. Ostensibly because White House officials downplayed the Kislyak phone calls, presumably in light of what Flynn had told them about the calls, Yates would go to the White House the next day and insinuate Flynn should probably be fired.
February 9: The strategy to get Flynn fired didn’t immediately work so another leak was deployed to Greg Miller, Adam Entous and Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post. That article, headline “National security adviser Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador, despite denials, officials say,” was sourced to people who happened to share senior FBI leadership’s views on the Logan Act. This article was also based on criminal leaks of top secret information of phone call intercepts and laid out the FBI’s case for why Flynn’s contacts with a foreign adversary were a problem. The fact that such phone calls are routine, not to mention Flynn’s case that improved relations with Russia in a world where China, North Korea, and Iran were posing increasing threats, never made it into these articles for context.
February 13: The operation finally succeeded in getting Flynn fired and rendering him unable to review the operations against the Trump campaign, Trump transition team, and Trump administration.
March 1: Flynn was the first obstacle who had to be overcome. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was the next. The Trump loyalist with a strong Department of Justice background would also need to be briefed on the anti-Trump efforts unless he could be sidelined. Comey admitted that early in Sessions’ tenure, he deliberately hid Russia-related information from Sessions because, “it made little sense to report it to Attorney General Sessions, who we expected would likely recuse himself from involvement in Russia-related investigations.” To secure that recusal, yet another leak was deployed to the Washington Post’s Adam Entous, Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller. The leak was intended to tar Sessions as a secret Russian agent and was dramatically spun as “Sessions Spoke Twice To Russian Envoy: Revelation contradicts his testimony at confirmation hearing.” One meeting was in passing and the other was in his function as a United States Senator, but the hysteria was such that the Post authors could get away with suggesting Sessions was too compromised to oversee the Department of Justice’s counterintelligence operations involving Russia. It is perhaps worth noting that the Special Counsel idea was pushed in this article.
March 2: Sessions recused himself from oversight of the FBI’s anti-Trump operation, providing no meaningful oversight to an operation that would be spun into a Special Counsel by mid-May. With the removal of Trump’s National Security Advisor and his Attorney General, there was no longer any chance of Trump loyalists discovering what Obama holdovers at the FBI were actually doing to get Trump thrown out of office. After Trump fired Comey for managerial incompetence on May 9, deceptively edited and misleading leaks to the New York Times ordered by Comey himself were used to gin up a Special Counsel run exclusively by left-wing anti-Trump partisans who continued the operation without any meaningful oversight for another two years.
This stunning operation was not just a typical battle between political foes, nor merely an example of media bias against political enemies. Instead, this entire operation was a deliberate and direct attack on the foundation of American governance. In light of the newly declassified documents released in recent days, it is clear that understanding what happened in that January 5 Oval Office meeting is essential to understanding the full scope and breadth of the corrupt operation against the Trump administration. It is long past time for lawmakers in Congress who are actually interested in oversight of the federal government and the media to demand answers about what really happened in that meeting from every single participant, including Obama and Biden.
More to come.. but you get the picture... now they are trying to Cover their crooked tracks.
If you understand WHY then share an enlighten the rest of them!
ReplyDelete