Nuclear Option is 51 Votes in Senate to approve all things without a Fillibuster. Republicans have it NOW! USE IT!

Please read and Share!
DONALD TRUMP CAN GET HIS WAY WITH A REPUBLICAN SENATE.. WITH THE NUCLEAR OPTION TO BLOCK DEMOCRAT OBSTRUCTIONIST FILIBUSTERS:

LIKE HUSSEIN OBAMA ONCE SAID.. "ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES" 

AND I SAY "PAYBACK IS A BITCH... BITCHES!"

YES.. HAHA !! IN 2017 and we have the right to do what Harry Reid did. I HOPE MITCH MCCONNEL HAS THE BALLS!

Look we must do it. When they lose the want to change the rules from Electoral College to Popular Vote. Right? So why should we go back to the old rules when they changed the rules. YES HARRY REID CHANGED THE RULES AND WON WHAT THEY WANTED PASSED. WILL THEY REVERSE THEIR WINS.. HELL NO! LEARN HOW THE LEFT PLAYS. BEAT THEM AT THEIR GAME OR THEY WILL HAVE OUR HEADS.

When The Left wins they want our Heads
When they lose they want us to be bipartisan.

How long will it take you all to see their plan to win?


Democrats may be on the verge of reaping the bitter harvest of the seeds sowed in November 2013.

The then-majority Democrats used a controversial parliamentary gimmick to unilaterally reinterpret existing Senate rules. By use of the so-called "nuclear option," they established the principle that a simple majority in the Senate can overrun any rule at any time.

It is often written that the Senate Democrats led by then-Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) "changed" the filibuster rule as it applies to judicial nominations (with an exemption for Supreme Court nominees). They did nothing of the sort. They were in the Majority and they wanted it all.Democrats, by fiat, altered the way the Senate interprets Rule XXII, which governs the procedure for cutting off debate and ending a filibuster. The rule continues to prescribe that when a cloture vote occurs, the question must be put, "Is it the sense of the Senate that the debate shall be brought to a close?"
It goes on to state that cloture is invoked if "the question [is] decided in the affirmative by three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn."

But Reid raised a point of order, claiming that the words "three-fifths" mean "a simple majority." The presiding officer, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), on the advice of the Senate parliamentarian, rejected the point of order.
So...
However, the majority, by a 52-48 vote (three Democrats voted "no"), was able to overturn the ruling of the chair, creating the new precedent that "three-fifths" or 60 senators means a simple "majority."
It doesn't take difficult math or much knowledge of the English language to see that this is ridiculous.

TOO LATE NOW BITCHES... The Democrats paved the way. Now in the minority, early in the 115th Congress, Democrats will be confronted by a Supreme Court nominee chosen by President Donald Trump. They will also be confronted on any nomination.
They won't like it. If nothing else, they will rightfully feel that the nomination legitimately belonged to President Obama. The Republicans stonewalled it for 10 months. Democrats will believe that the seat was stolen and that the Trump nomination is therefore illegitimate.

Consequently, a filibuster may occur. Thats when we MUST LEARN TO PLAY HARDBALL. THE DEMOCRATS USED IT.. NOW WE MUST USE IT TOO...

This could cause Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to trot out the nuclear option precedent and try to extend it to cover the Supreme Court, allowing the GOP to cut off debate and use its majority to confirm the nomination. ALL NOMINATIONS. SCREW THE LEFT. PLAY TO BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF THEM.

Ofcourse this will piss off the Democrats. The nuclear option, which Vice President Joe Biden, while a senator, called "a lie about a rule," was given its label by former Rules Committee Chairman Trent Lott (R-Miss.) in 2005 because Democrats were threatening that if the Republicans used the ploy to overcome their filibuster of several George W. Bush-nominated judges, the angry Democrats would bring the Senate to a halt by obstructing everything.

The bitterness created by the twin outrages of eliminating the right to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee, coupled with the unprecedented and constitutionally suspect stonewalling of Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, will further polarize an already deeply torn Senate. TOO BAD BITCHES. ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.

Remember this.. WE MUST NOT FORGET AND WE MUST REMIND MITCH MCCONNEL LEST HE FORGET.... In October, when it seemed possible that the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, would be the next president, Republicans Sens. Ted Cruz (Texas), John McCain (Ariz.) and Richard Burr (N.C.) were threatening to block any Clinton nominee. The Democrats' vice presidential nominee, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), in turn hinted that if that happened, Democrats would use the nuclear option to thwart a filibuster.

In 2010, just a few months before his death, Hillary Clinton's mentor and former KKK Wizard...Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) declared that:

"If the rules are abused, and senators exhaust the patience of their colleagues, such actions can invite draconian measures. But those measures themselves can, in the long run, be as detrimental to the role of the institution and to the rights of the American people as the abuse of the rules."

SO NOW THAT HARRY REID CREATED THE OPENING...LETS RESTORE AMERICA AND GIVE TRUMP WHAT HE NEEDS TO MAKE AMERICAN GREAT AGAIN.

Remember that the Social Democrats always have this slick pitch.

When they win.. they say "they have the gold so they make the rules."

WE WON SO NOW ITS TIME TO BITE BACK.. YES BITE BACK... HARD AND CHEW OFF SOME FLESH IN THE PROCESS... THOSE KIND OF RULES.

When they lose they want Bipartisanship.

I SAY HELL NO WAY...

Now the Nuclear Option will make repealing Obamacare way easier!

Conservatives are outraged over Harry Reid pulling the trigger on the so-called nuclear option in the Senate, making it impossible for Republicans to stop President Obama from nominating anyone he wants to positions in the government. 

But some on the right are finding comfort in the theory that Reid’s legislative maneuver could actually make it easier for Republicans to eventually repeal Obamacare — if all the pieces come together in 2017.

George Will had this to say:

“There’s no limiting principle in the principle they’re invoking,” Will said on Special Report on Fox News on Thursday night. “That is majorities should rule all the time.” 

He continued: “What this means is if in the spring of 2017 there’s a Republican president, which there could be, the Republicans still hold the House, and they have 51 senators, they can repeal Obamacare with 51 votes. And I’m not sure the people who did this today have thought this.”