Nuclear Option is 51 Votes in Senate to approve all things without a Fillibuster. Republicans have it NOW! USE IT!

Please read and Share!
DONALD TRUMP CAN GET HIS WAY WITH A REPUBLICAN SENATE.. WITH THE NUCLEAR OPTION TO BLOCK DEMOCRAT OBSTRUCTIONIST FILIBUSTERS:

LIKE HUSSEIN OBAMA ONCE SAID.. "ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES" 

AND I SAY "PAYBACK IS A BITCH... BITCHES!"

YES.. HAHA !! IN 2017 and we have the right to do what Harry Reid did. I HOPE MITCH MCCONNEL HAS THE BALLS!

Look we must do it. When they lose the want to change the rules from Electoral College to Popular Vote. Right? So why should we go back to the old rules when they changed the rules. YES HARRY REID CHANGED THE RULES AND WON WHAT THEY WANTED PASSED. WILL THEY REVERSE THEIR WINS.. HELL NO! LEARN HOW THE LEFT PLAYS. BEAT THEM AT THEIR GAME OR THEY WILL HAVE OUR HEADS.

When The Left wins they want our Heads
When they lose they want us to be bipartisan.

How long will it take you all to see their plan to win?


Democrats may be on the verge of reaping the bitter harvest of the seeds sowed in November 2013.

The then-majority Democrats used a controversial parliamentary gimmick to unilaterally reinterpret existing Senate rules. By use of the so-called "nuclear option," they established the principle that a simple majority in the Senate can overrun any rule at any time.

It is often written that the Senate Democrats led by then-Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) "changed" the filibuster rule as it applies to judicial nominations (with an exemption for Supreme Court nominees). They did nothing of the sort. They were in the Majority and they wanted it all.Democrats, by fiat, altered the way the Senate interprets Rule XXII, which governs the procedure for cutting off debate and ending a filibuster. The rule continues to prescribe that when a cloture vote occurs, the question must be put, "Is it the sense of the Senate that the debate shall be brought to a close?"
It goes on to state that cloture is invoked if "the question [is] decided in the affirmative by three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn."

But Reid raised a point of order, claiming that the words "three-fifths" mean "a simple majority." The presiding officer, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), on the advice of the Senate parliamentarian, rejected the point of order.
So...
However, the majority, by a 52-48 vote (three Democrats voted "no"), was able to overturn the ruling of the chair, creating the new precedent that "three-fifths" or 60 senators means a simple "majority."
It doesn't take difficult math or much knowledge of the English language to see that this is ridiculous.

TOO LATE NOW BITCHES... The Democrats paved the way. Now in the minority, early in the 115th Congress, Democrats will be confronted by a Supreme Court nominee chosen by President Donald Trump. They will also be confronted on any nomination.
They won't like it. If nothing else, they will rightfully feel that the nomination legitimately belonged to President Obama. The Republicans stonewalled it for 10 months. Democrats will believe that the seat was stolen and that the Trump nomination is therefore illegitimate.

Consequently, a filibuster may occur. Thats when we MUST LEARN TO PLAY HARDBALL. THE DEMOCRATS USED IT.. NOW WE MUST USE IT TOO...

This could cause Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to trot out the nuclear option precedent and try to extend it to cover the Supreme Court, allowing the GOP to cut off debate and use its majority to confirm the nomination. ALL NOMINATIONS. SCREW THE LEFT. PLAY TO BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF THEM.

Ofcourse this will piss off the Democrats. The nuclear option, which Vice President Joe Biden, while a senator, called "a lie about a rule," was given its label by former Rules Committee Chairman Trent Lott (R-Miss.) in 2005 because Democrats were threatening that if the Republicans used the ploy to overcome their filibuster of several George W. Bush-nominated judges, the angry Democrats would bring the Senate to a halt by obstructing everything.

The bitterness created by the twin outrages of eliminating the right to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee, coupled with the unprecedented and constitutionally suspect stonewalling of Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, will further polarize an already deeply torn Senate. TOO BAD BITCHES. ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.

Remember this.. WE MUST NOT FORGET AND WE MUST REMIND MITCH MCCONNEL LEST HE FORGET.... In October, when it seemed possible that the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, would be the next president, Republicans Sens. Ted Cruz (Texas), John McCain (Ariz.) and Richard Burr (N.C.) were threatening to block any Clinton nominee. The Democrats' vice presidential nominee, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), in turn hinted that if that happened, Democrats would use the nuclear option to thwart a filibuster.

In 2010, just a few months before his death, Hillary Clinton's mentor and former KKK Wizard...Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) declared that:

"If the rules are abused, and senators exhaust the patience of their colleagues, such actions can invite draconian measures. But those measures themselves can, in the long run, be as detrimental to the role of the institution and to the rights of the American people as the abuse of the rules."

SO NOW THAT HARRY REID CREATED THE OPENING...LETS RESTORE AMERICA AND GIVE TRUMP WHAT HE NEEDS TO MAKE AMERICAN GREAT AGAIN.

Remember that the Social Democrats always have this slick pitch.

When they win.. they say "they have the gold so they make the rules."

WE WON SO NOW ITS TIME TO BITE BACK.. YES BITE BACK... HARD AND CHEW OFF SOME FLESH IN THE PROCESS... THOSE KIND OF RULES.

When they lose they want Bipartisanship.

I SAY HELL NO WAY...

Now the Nuclear Option will make repealing Obamacare way easier!

Conservatives are outraged over Harry Reid pulling the trigger on the so-called nuclear option in the Senate, making it impossible for Republicans to stop President Obama from nominating anyone he wants to positions in the government. 

But some on the right are finding comfort in the theory that Reid’s legislative maneuver could actually make it easier for Republicans to eventually repeal Obamacare — if all the pieces come together in 2017.

George Will had this to say:

“There’s no limiting principle in the principle they’re invoking,” Will said on Special Report on Fox News on Thursday night. “That is majorities should rule all the time.” 

He continued: “What this means is if in the spring of 2017 there’s a Republican president, which there could be, the Republicans still hold the House, and they have 51 senators, they can repeal Obamacare with 51 votes. And I’m not sure the people who did this today have thought this.”

Why Clintons were involved with a Pedophile ring around Washington DC? BLACKMAIL.

URGENT.. PLEASE READ AND SHARE.. 
When I saw the headline a few days ago..

"BOMBSHELL! Hillary Clinton Pedophile Sex Ring Continues to be Exposed by Insiders"

I asked myself...

Why are they involved??

Well I have the answer. Share if you agree!

                 BLACKMAIL !!

 

Definition of blackmail

"the crime of threatening to tell secret information about someone unless the person being threatened gives you money or does what you want."

READ UP !!

Weiner’s Emails Expose Huge Pedophile Ring In Washington DC: Hillary and Bill Clinton Implicated.

Hillary Clinton hopped on the ‘Lolita Express’ with her husband many many times. These rumors have turned into accusations that the Hillary Clinton email scandal could reveal damning evidence that she used the Lolita Express to photograph officials to blackmail and buy their silence.

If you haven’t heard of the ‘Lolita Express’ it is a private jet owned by convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Hillary Clinton has done many twisted things over the years to make money and gain political power, but thanks to Anthony Weiner’s emails that prompted the FBI to reopen Hillary’s case, the world is about to learn just how CUNNING this woman and her Gang of Thugs truly are. They have used every Saul Alinsky "Rules for Radicals" trick and even using tricks and traps used by the KGB and the CIA to grow their CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

To Protect your criminal Enterprise.. BLACKMAIL AND PAYOLA AND GRAFT ARE THE KEYSTONES.

Obama and his Thugs used the NSA and other Data mines to BLACKMAIL Justice Roberts, and even the Old Pope into Resigning! See my older blogs.

A former state official is coming forward attesting to the contents of those emails, and the information should ruin Hillary and likely place her behind bars for many years to come if Donald Trump is elected and Obama does not Blanket Pardon the whole gang of THUGS.

Pedophiles are the vilest humans walking among us. It’s amazing that Anthony Weiner and Epstein and the Arab Potentates who freely practice it are free to walk the earth, when at the very least he should be locked away in prison for repeatedly preying upon innocent little girls.

Anthony Weiner sending pics of his junk to underage girls, all while his kid sleeps nearby.

Hillary Clinton and her thugs found a perfect way to use Blackmail and how convenient, Anthony Weiner already had that depravity in him and he is married to Huma Abedein who can set it all up.

According to a bombshell from a former State Department Official, Hillary is at the center of a pedophile ring in Washington, D.C. She was actively placing little girls into the hands of pedophiles, just like Anthony Weiner, all while using the Clinton Foundation as a cover to mask the illegal activity. WHY ?? BLACKMAIL!

Wild rumors began flying several days ago as to what’s in the contents of these 650,000 Weiner emails. The story involving Hillary and the Clinton Foundation actually began back in July, after an anonymous FBI informant began posting to the online message board frequently used by anonymous hackers, known as 4chan.
The informant explained how the email server from Hillary’s previous email investigation wasn’t the “real prize,” but how the focus should be on the Clinton Foundation, who’s at the center of a pedophile ring that involves sickos within the United States and foreign countries as well.

“The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought,” the informant said.
One person responded: “Ok. Do tell. What about the human trafficking? I assume that those who can be indicted are involved.”
“Pedophiles and sex traffickers everywhere. Many politicians trade girls like cattle,” The FBI informant responds.
“Sex rings are popular in all governments, but pedophilia is primarily in British parliament & Saudi Arabia, and that’s why HRC and Bill Clinton love foreign donors so much. They get paid in children as well as money,” the informant responds. “Dig deep and you can find it. It will sicken you.”

The FBI informant’s bombshell allegations against Hillary seemed far-fetched at the time, but now in the light of the FBI reopening their case against Hillary, other insiders are stepping forward to corroborate the claims.

only a stupid detective couldn't figure this out. Watch if the information ever gets out you will find the names of many in the Justice Department, IRS and other Federal agencies on the list of those being blackmailed.

SO PEOPLE.. its too naive and shortsighted to imagine that Hillary and Bill are just sexual deviants. Thats too easy. Look at the big picture. Its a big plan and it fits into everything else they are doing in the State Department and the Clinton Foundation.

Read some history on Blackmail by the Russians and others:

They are called the "Honey Traps"

Yes this kind of seduction is known as a "honey trap." Are honey traps real, or are they found only in James Bond movies? 

Oh, they're real. Honey traps, also called "honey pots," have been a favorite spying tactic as long as sex and espionage have existed—in other words, forever. Perhaps the earliest honey trap on record was the betrayal of Samson by Delilah, who revealed Samson's weakness (his hair) to the Philistines in exchange for 1,100 pieces of silver, as described in the book of Judges. The practice continued into the 20^th century and became a staple of Cold War spy craft. Governments around the world set up honey traps to this day, but it's an especially common practice in Russia and China. The Central Intelligence Agency doesn't comment on whether its agents use their sexuality to obtain information, but current and former intelligence officials say it does happen occasionally.

The classic honey trap is seduction to extract secrets. Perhaps the best-known trap layer was the Dutch exotic dancer Mata Hari, who was executed by firing squad in France in 1917 for allegedly passing secrets along to the Germans. Other times, spies set honey traps to draw their victims into their enemy's clutches. In 1978, undercover Sandinista operative Nora Astorga lured a Nicaraguan general into her bedroom, where assailants slit his throat. When Israeli technician Mordechai Vanunu went public with secrets about Israel's nuclear capabilities in 1986, he fled to London, only to be seduced by a woman who led him to Mossad agents in Rome. (A rabbi later determined that the Mossad's actions were, in fact, kosher.)

Honey trapping often leads to blackmail—though some of the more famous examples didn't go according to plan. In one 1957 case, the Soviets recruited an attractive man to seduce legendary (and gay) American columnist Joseph Alsop. When KGB agents tried to blackmail Alsop with compromising photos, he went to the American authorities and told them everything. London Daily Telegraph correspondent Jeremy Wolfenden got similarly ensnared in the 1960s, when the KGB photographed him having sex with another man. Wolfenden told the British embassy, and they asked him to become a double agent. The stress drove him to drink. He died at age 31. When the KGB tried to blackmail Indonesian President Achmed Sukarno with videotapes of the president having sex with Russian women disguised as flight attendants, Sukarno wasn't upset. He was pleased. He even asked for more copies of the video to show back in his country.

Women, too, have been honey-trap targets.  During the Cold War, East German intelligence chief Markus Wolf sent Stasi "Romeo spies" into West Germany to seduce powerful women and extract their secrets.* In the early '80s, a CIA agent stationed in Ghana fell in love with a man who turned out to be a Ghanaian intelligence officer.

No one has perfected the honey trap quite like the Russians. One former KGB agent has said that the Soviet intelligence agency didn't ask Russian women to stand up for their country but "asked them to lay down." One of the biggest Cold War spy cases was that of Clayton Lonetree, a Marine Corps security guard entrapped by a female Soviet officer, then blackmailed into sharing documents. In 1987, he became the first Marine convicted of espionage. Russian spy craft didn't disappear with the Soviet Union. Russian political satirist Viktor Shenderovich was recently filmed cheating on his wife with a young woman named Katya, who had also seduced a half dozen other Kremlin critics. A similar trap appeared to catch  an American diplomat in Moscow in 2009, but the State Department said the evidence was fabricated as part of a smear campaign.*  China, too, seems to employ honey traps regularly. When former Deputy Mayor of London Ian Clement was seduced and drugged in his Beijing hotel room in 2009 only to find his BlackBerry stolen the next day, he admitted that he "fell for the oldest trick in the book."

The Clintons took it up a notch.. Pedophile rings. That gets the results even better. JAIL TIME is caught!

WISE UP .. PATRIOTS... IF I CAN SEE IT.. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SEES IT.. AND IF THEY DO NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.. ITS BECAUSE THEY ARE DIRTY TOO.

Loretta Lynch is protecting Hillary because Obama is involved in this money scheme and if Hillary is Indicted she will squeal

DOES IT ALL MAKE SENSE NOW? DID YOU KNOW THAT Clinton Campaign HQ is Just Two Floors Below Loretta Lynch NO SHIT!! 

 

 

DOJ's Peter Kadzik from that office is exposed Colluding With Clinton Campaign KNOW THIS...

Loretta Lynch is protecting Hillary because Obama is involved in this money scheme and if Hillary is Indicted she will squeal

like the fat PIG about Obama. 

So Loretta is covering both of them.

Obama will be arrested and tried for corruption if Hillary is BUSTED! Obama will be arrested and put on trial for corruption. THATS THE BIG SECRET!

Now.. DOJ Officials are using private email accounts to tip Hillary of coming investigations too.

Hillary Clinton knows when you're seeking to avoid indictment by the nation's top law enforcement officer, nothing is more important than location... That's why when the Clinton campaign headquarters needed a permanent location, they chose to set up shop here, at 1 Pierrepont Plaza in Brooklyn, a lovely modern building that also houses the New York offices of Attorney General Loretta Lynch. 

 

This was first brought to our attention over the weekend in a tweet from Wikileaks. In 2015 Hillary Clinton's campaign HQ moved to 1 Pierrepoint Plazza just a few floors under DoJ head Lorreta Lynch. pic.twitter.com/ffCGQLGsVV — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) June 13, 2016 Hillary Knows Avoiding Indictment Is All About Location... JUSTICE IS NOT IMPARTIAL AT LORETTA LYNCH'S DOJ. THE WHOLE FUCKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT AND MUST BE TORN DOWN! President Bill Clinton Appointed Loretta Lynch In 1999... Hillary Clinton has received nearly $75,000 in political contributions from employees at the Department of Justice, the agency that will decide whether or not to act if the FBI recommends charges against Clinton or her aides following its investigation into her private email server. THE WHOLE WORM BALL OF CROOKS NEEDS TO BE DESTROYED

NOW MORE ABOUT
DOJ's Peter Kadzik WHO IS Exposed Colluding With Clinton Campaign

Peter Kadzik was the DOJ representative chosen to head up a "thorough" review of the new Huma Abedin emails as revealed by a letter he wrote to Congress.  Given Kadzik's personal relationship with Podesta, it seemed like a "convenient" choice for the Clinton campaign. 

In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.

"Ironically", that is the same Peter Kadzik who has proven his "impartiality" in multiple WikiLeaks emails including this newly released bombshell in which Kadzik provides a very helpful "heads up" about Hillary's email server investigation. This is what Kadzik emailed to John Podesta (via gmail) on May 19, 2015:

There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the emails.

As we also reported previously (see below), prior to joining the DOJ, Kadzik was the attorney of Marc Rich, whose records the FBI released yesterday, as well as Podesta; in facat, the Clinton campaign chairman infamously wrote that Kadzik was a “fantastic lawyer” who “kept me out of jail.”
And since we have no reason to doubt his "fantastic" legal skills, perhaps Mr. Kadzik can explain to our readers - and the American public -  why this particular message was delivered via his private, gmail account rather than his official DOJ email account?

Sure, who needs an independent investigator, this guy will do just fine.
* * *
And for readers who missed our original report on the long-running relationship between John Podesta and his close friend Peter Kadzik, here is an excerpt from our most recent article on the topic:

In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.

#BREAKING Senior DOJ official sends letter to lawmakers responding to request for more information about email review.#8days pic.twitter.com/PCgT2ODkQd

— Just the Facts (@JTF_News) October 31, 2016

So far so good, even if one wonders just how active the DOJ will be in a case that has shown an unprecedented schism between the politically influenced Department of Justice and the FBI.
And yet, something felt odd about this.
Kadzik... Kadzik... where have we heard that name?
Oh yes. Recall our post from last week, "Clinton Campaign Chair Had Dinner With Top DOJ Official One Day After Hillary's Benghazi Hearing" in which we reported that John Podesta had dinner with one of the highest ranked DOJ officials the very day after Hillary Clinton's Benghazi testimony?
It was Peter Kadzik.

In other words, the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton's Campaign chair, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.
For those who missed it, this is what we reported previously:

The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, Hillary's campaign chairman met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, who is currently a top official at the US Justice Department serving as Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs.

The post-Benghazi dinner was attended by Podesta, Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures. The first mention of personal contact between Podesta and Kadzik in the Wikileaks dump is in an Oct. 23, 2015 email sent out by Vincent Roberti, a lobbyist who is close to Podesta and his superlobbyist brother, Tony Podesta. In it, Roberti refers to a dinner reservation at Posto, a Washington D.C. restaurant.  The dinner was set for 7:30 that evening, just one day after Clinton gave 11 hours of testimony to the Benghazi Committee.

Podesta and Kadzik met several months later for dinner at Podesta’s home, another email shows. Another email sent on May 5, 2015, Kadzik’s son asked Podesta for a job on the Clinton campaign.

As the Daily Caller noted, the dinner arrangement "is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of state’s email practices." As one former U.S. Attorney tells told the DC, the exchanges are another example of the Clinton campaign’s “cozy relationship” with the Obama Justice Department.
The hacked emails confirm that Podesta and Kadzik were in frequent contact. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podesta’s birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik’s son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.
“The political appointees in the Obama administration, especially in the Department of Justice, appear to be very partisan in nature and I don’t think had clean hands when it comes to the investigation of the private email server,” says Matthew Whitaker, the executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, a government watchdog group.
“It’s the kind of thing the American people are frustrated about is that the politically powerful have insider access and have these kind of relationships that ultimately appear to always break to the benefit of Hillary Clinton,” he added, comparing the Podesta-Kadzik meetings to the revelation that Attorney General Loretta Lynch met in private with Bill Clinton at the airport in Phoenix days before the FBI and DOJ investigating Hillary Clinton.
Kadzik's role at the DOJ, where he started in 2013, is particularly notable Kadzik, as helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.
It gets better because, as we further revealed, if there is one person in the DOJ who is John Podesta's, and thus the Clinton Foundation's inside man, it is Peter Kadjik.
Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office. That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account. In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon flagged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign. Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House transition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a “fantastic lawyer” who “kept me out of jail.”

Podesta was caught in a sticky situation in both the Lewinsky affair and the Rich pardon scandal. As deputy chief of staff to Clinton in 1996, Podesta asked then-United Nations ambassador Bill Richardson to hire the 23-year-old Lewinsky. In April 1996, the White House transferred Lewinsky from her job as a White House intern to the Pentagon in order to keep her and Bill Clinton separate. But the Clinton team also wanted to keep Lewinsky happy so that she would not spill the beans about her sexual relationship with Clinton.
Richardson later recounted in his autobiography that he offered Lewinsky the position but that she declined it.
Podesta made false statements to a grand jury impaneled by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr for the investigation. But he defended the falsehoods, saying later that he was merely relaying false information from Clinton that he did not know was inaccurate at the time. “He did lie to me,” Podesta said about Clinton in a National Public Radio interview in 1998. Clinton was acquitted by the Senate in Feb. 1999 of perjury and obstruction of justice charges related to the Lewinsky probe. Kadzik, then a lawyer with the firm Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky, represented Podesta through the fiasco.
Podesta had been promoted to Clinton’s chief of staff when he and Kadzik became embroiled in another scandal.
Kadzik was then representing Marc Rich, a billionaire financier who was wanted by the U.S. government for evading a $48 million tax bill. The fugitive, who was also implicated in illegal trading activity with nations that sponsored terrorism, had been living in Switzerland for 17 years when he sought the pardon. To help Rich, Kadzik lobbied Podesta heavily in the weeks before Clinton left office on Jan. 20, 2001. A House Oversight Committee report released in May 2002 stated that “Kadzik was recruited into Marc Rich’s lobbying campaign because he was a long-time friend of White House Chief of Staff John Podesta.”
The report noted that Kadzik contacted Podesta at least seven times regarding Rich’s pardon. On top of the all-hands-on-deck lobbying effort, Rich’s ex-wife, Denise Rich, had doled out more than $1 million to the Clintons and other Democrats prior to the pardon. She gave $100,000 to Hillary Clinton’s New York Senate campaign and another $450,000 to the Clinton presidential library.
Kadzik's current role
In his current role as head of the Office of Legislative Affairs, Kadzik handles inquiries from Congress on a variety of issues. In that role he was not in the direct chain of command on the Clinton investigation. The Justice Department and FBI have insisted that career investigators oversaw the investigation, which concluded in July with no charges filed against Clinton.
But Kadzik worked on other Clinton email issues in his dealings with Congress. Last November, he denied a request from Republican lawmakers to appoint a special counsel to lead the investigation.
In a Feb. 1, 2016 letter in response to Kadzik, Florida Rep. Ron DeSantis noted that Kadzik had explained “that special counsel may be appointed at the discretion of the Attorney General when an investigation or prosecution by the Department of Justice would create a potential conflict of interest.”
DeSantis, a Republican, suggested that Lynch’s appointment by Bill Clinton in 1999 as U.S. Attorney in New York may be considered a conflict of interest. He also asserted that Obama’s political appointees — a list which includes Kadzik — “are being asked to impartially execute their respective duties as Department of Justice officials that may involve an investigation into the activities of the forerunner for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.”
It is unknown if Kadzik responded to DeSantis’ questions.
Kadzik’s first involvement in the Clinton email brouhaha came in a Sept. 24, 2015 response letter to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley in which he declined to confirm or deny whether the DOJ was investigating Clinton. Last month, Politico reported that Kadzik angered Republican lawmakers when, in a classified briefing, he declined to say whether Clinton aides who received DOJ immunity were required to cooperate with congressional probes.
Kadzik also testified at a House Oversight Committee hearing last month on the issue of classifications and redactions in the FBI’s files of the Clinton email investigation.
Finally, it is also worth noting that Kadzik's wife, Amy Weiss, currently at Weiss Public Affairs worked on the 1992 Clinton/Gore Campaign as a Press Secretary, and Communications Director for the Democratic National Committee, and a White House Deputy Assistant to the President/Deputy Press Secretary to President Bill Clinton.
* * *
And now it seems that Kadzik will be in charge of the DOJ's "probe" into Huma Abedin's emails. Which is why we are a little skeptical the DOJ will find "anything" of note.

Amy Weiss, Peter Kadzik, with lobbyist Tony Podesta, brother of John Podesta.

AND TONY PODESA IN THIS PICTURE ?? John's Brother?? gets 140,000 a months from the SAUDI GOVERNMENT AS THE INSIDER TO CLINTON THROUGH JOHN.

Brother of Hillary’s Campaign Chief John Podesta Gets $140K Per Month to Lobby for Saudis

Getty

TEL AVIV — The Saudi government has contracted the communications and strategy firm of Tony Podesta, the brother of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta, paying the group $140,000 per month to work for Saudi interests in the U.S.

The Saudi government and its affiliates have spent millions of dollars on U.S. law, lobby and public relations firms to raise the country’s visibility in the United States and before the United Nations at a crucial time.
And some of Washington’s premier law and lobby firms — including Podesta Group, BGR Government Affairs, DLA Piper and Pillsbury Winthrop — have been tasked with the job, according to a review of Justice Department filings.

The Post added some specifics about the Saudi contract with the Podesta Group but failed to report the significant detail that the firm’s owner, who is personally working on the Saudi account, is John Podesta’s brother. The Post only identified Tony Podesta as “a top Democratic lobbyist and major contributor to Hillary Clinton.”
Tony Podesta is a financial bundler for the Democratic Party, including Clinton’s campaigns.
The newspaper reported:

The lobby firm Podesta Group has an ongoing contract with the Center for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court, a government entity, for $140,000 monthly. Barring any changes to the fee schedule, the year-long work would earn the firm $1.68 million by the end of 2016. The firm’s founder Tony Podesta, a top Democratic lobbyist and major contributor to Hillary Clinton, is working personally on the matter, according to a March filing.  Podesta president Kim Fritts, a longtime Republican consultant and adviser to Jeb Bush, is listed on the contract, which the firm would not elaborate on.

John Podesta, meanwhile, is the founder of the Center for American Progress, the highly influential progressive think-tank.  Prior to heading Clinton’s 2016 campaign, he served as counselor to the Obama White House.
This reporter previously documented that some of the CAP’s major corporate donors have also been listed as clients to Tony Podesta’s firm.
In 2013, I reported:

SourceWatch documents that Tony Podesta’s website previously listed the firm’s clients, which reportedly included Google.
Google is also a corporate donor to John Podesta’s PAC, it has been revealed.
Besides corporate clients, Tony Podesta has represented foreign governments, including Iraq and Egypt.
The Huffington Post reported that another CAP donor is the Livingston Group. Livingston is not currently listed on CAP’s donor page, but the Huffington Post said it was provided the donor list by CAP itself.
A cached version of the CAP donor page finds Livingston on the list.
Livingston provided a statement to the Hill saying it was the “interlocutor” of the donation, which was actually made by a mining company, Anglo American, a Livingston client.
“We didn’t make the contribution. The contribution was made by a client of ours. We were the interlocutor. That’s all. It was an honest mistake,” said the Livingston Group spokeswoman.

Until 2012, Livingston represented the Egyptian government with Tony Podesta’s firm.
The Washington Free Beacon reported in 2012 that Tony Podesta’s firm was among a group of 50 companies that toured Egypt under the rule of Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohamed Morsi to open business ties with the new government. Numerous firms represented by Tony Podesta visited Egypt.
The Free Beacon reported:

Ten of the 50 companies present on the tour have been clients of lobbying firms separately run by Podesta’s brother and sister-in-law, leaving some observers wondering what role the Democratic insider may have played in determining which companies earned slots on the potentially lucrative junket.
One of the firms, The Podesta Group, is operated by Tony Podesta, who is John’s brother. The other, Heather Podesta + Partners, is run by John’s sister-in-law.
During the several-day jaunt, business leaders from the finance, defense, and aerospace sectors, among others, were exposed to investment opportunities in Egypt’s burgeoning public and private sectors.

Also on that Egypt trip was John Podesta, the Free Beacon reported.

SMOKING GUN. WIKILEAKS SHOWS CLINTON THUG CHERYL MILLS TRIES TO COVER UP OBAMA EMAIL TO HILLARY SERVER. OBAMA LIED!

The Smoking Gun: Cheryl Mills Tells John Podesta "We Need To Clean This Up - Obama Has Emails From Her"

DOJ AND FBI WILL NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT AND HOPES HILLARY WINS ELECTION.

We have inside information about the Contingency plans if Hillary does not win the Presidency.

1. Obama Plans to pardon ALL Clinton Camp Thugs including John Podesta, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin and of course Bill and Hillary Clinton.

2, The Clintons have bought a $ 200,000 Million dollar home and Island in Maldives to run to ( BECAUSE THERE IS NO EXTRADITION TREATY WITH MALDIVES) https://www.ncscooper.com/wikileaks-clintons-purchase-200-million-maldives-estate/
3. Obama has bought expensive Homes in Saudi Arabia and Dubai in case he has to run. 

Obama Buys $4.9 Seaside Mansion in Non-Extradition Country of Dubai
https://thelastgreatstand.com/2016/02/21/obama-buys-4-9-seaside-mansion-in-non-extradition-country-of-dubai/

4. George Sorros has set up electronic Voting Machines in 16 States to ensure Fraudulent Vote Counting.


http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/concern-grows-over-soros-linked-voting-machines/
 

GET THE PICTURE...

Recall that in a March 2015 interview with CBS, just after the NYT reported of Hillary's use of a private email server, president Obama told the American public he had only learned about Hillary's "unusual" arrangement from the press.
As we further reminded readers one month ago, CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante asked Mr. Obama when he learned about her private email system after his Saturday appearance in Selma, Alabama. "The same time everybody else learned it through news reports," the president told Plante. "The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived," Mr. Obama said. "I'm glad that Hillary's instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed."

They lied, and the "transparency" of the Obama administration was severely tarnished in late September, when in the FBI's interview notes with Huma Abedin released by the FBI it was first revealed that Obama had used a pseudonymous email account: "Once informed that the sender's name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: 'How is this not classified?'" the report says. "Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president's use of a pseudonym ( FAKE NAME OBAMA WAS USING TO COVER HIS TRACKS) and asked if she could have a copy of the email."


To be sure, this was not definitive evidence that Obama was aware of Hillary's email server, nor that there may have been collusion between the president and the Clinton campaign.
That changed today, however, when in the latest Podesta dump we learn that in an email from Cheryl Mills to John Podesta, the Clinton aide upon learning what Obama had just said...

I have some questions here pic.twitter.com/ufkeoZCx2m

— Katherine Miller (@katherinemiller) March 7, 2015

... countered with something quite stunning:

we need to clean this up - he has emails from her - they do not say state.gov

That, ladies and gentlemen, is proof that the president not only lied, but did so with the clear intention of protecting the Clinton campaign.

As a further reminder, Politico previously reported that the State Department had refused to make public that and other emails Clinton exchanged with Obama. Lawyers cited the "presidential communications privilege," a variation of executive privilege, in order to withhold the messages under the Freedom of Information Act. It is therefore unknown what the president's "alternative" email account was, or who hosted it.
This also explains why in a prior Wikileak, Podesta told Mills in an email titled "Special Category" that she thinks "we should hold emails to and from Potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I(t) seems like they will." Mills did not respond by email.
The Clinton-Obama emails were turned over to the State Department, which later announced it would not release them.
* * *
So just how did Mills and Podesta "clean up" the fact that Obama lied to the American people, a tactic some could allege is evidence of an attempt to cover up a presidential lie to protect Hillary Clinton.
What we do know, and we assume this is completely unrelated, between March 25-31, just a couple of weeks after Mills said "we need to clean this up," Bleachbit was used to wipe Hillary's private server clean. But of course, that is purely a coincidence.
Since we are confident others will also demand an answer, in light of the latest revelation hinting at a collusive cover up extending to the very top of US government, or as Cheryl Mills dubbed it a "clean up", perhaps it is time for the State Department to unveil just what was said between the president and the Clinton campaign?

Hillary State department Bribes FBI.. Corrupt Justice Department Laughs it off. Congress MUST DEMAND INVESTIGATION NOW!

Hillary State Department Official Tried to BRIBE the FBI. OBAMA JUSTICE DEPARTMENT KNOWS THIS BUT LOOKS THE OTHER WAY!

THIS IS THE CROOKED STATE DEPARTMENT LACKEY OF HILLARY CLINTON..
PATRICK KENNEDY

Thanks to the whistleblowers at WikiLeaks and fighters in the Republican Congress, we’re beginning to know the true extent of Hillary Clinton’s corruption.

The media can ignore the revelations and try to protect Hillary, but Americans are learning the truth: Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy made a series of attempts to bribe the FBI in an effort to protect Hillary Clinton.
Kennedy offered a ‘quid pro quo’ to an FBI agent, in which he promised to open up overseas slots for FBI agents in exchange for the FBI retroactively declassifying an email marked SECRET that was found on Clinton’s unsecured illegal private email server.
This revelation comes from summaries of FBI interviews, called 302s, from their criminal investigation of Clinton.

In an exchange that included redacted names, the interview notes state that “[REDACTED] received a call from [REDACTED] of the International Operations Division (IOD) of the FBI, who ‘pressured’ him to change the classified email to unclassified. [REDACTED] indicated he had been contacted by PATRICK KENNEDY, Undersecretary of State, who had asked his assistance in altering the email’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo.’”

Attempted bribery of a government official is a felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison. But as we’ve seen over and over again in the corrupt Obama administration, they will use their power to commit crimes and then protect themselves from any responsibility.
The State Department’s official response has been: “Pat Kennedy is going to stay at his job, and he has the full confidence of the Secretary of State.” The FBI has denied the existence of a quid pro quo. The State Department admits no wrongdoing. But we have the evidence! What can we do about it?
Right now citizens are petitioning Congress to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Kennedy. We already know that if enough people make their voice heard, the politicians are forced to listen.
The Republican Congress should absolutely investigate Obama’s State Department for criminal wrongdoing.
Donald Trump called Kennedy’s duplicity “one of the great miscarriages of justice in the history of our country.” Newt Gingrich and Marco Rubio have both called for Kennedy to be suspended and investigated.
Republican Congressmen Jason Chaffetz and Devin Nunes have called on President Obama to suspend Kennedy and convene an investigation.
America needs real leadership. We can no longer sit silently while the political establishment breaks any law they feel like!

Congress MUST appoint a special prosecutor to investigate this bribery claim? He is also the same State Department Lackey who headed the Benghazi Investigation..

The Bureaucrat at the Center of Hillary’s Scandals

 

Patrick Kennedy has been linked to Benghazi and Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Here's how he survived years of GOP and FBI investigations.

From Justice Jeanine Pierro
"This is the same Patrick Kennedy that Hillary put in charge of her blue ribbon accountability review board for lessons learned from Benghazi.  By the way, already learned from the Khobar towers review board,  lessons never implemented by Hillary. 

The same Patrick Kennedy who appointed the Clinton pals who then chose not to question Hillary the secretary of state. 
Kennedy knows the urgency of destroying this particular email as opposed to thousands of others, so he engages in what some say is an attempt to bribe and others say is a quid pro quo discussion offering the fbi long sought positions overseas in exchange for getting rid of top secret emails.
Curious that our ambassador personally and his staff requested security more than 600 times to protect their lives ..yet Kennedy can come up with positions to cover Hillary's¦ career. 
Fbi agents summaries known as 302's say Kennedy actually offered a quid pro quo. FBI positions to declassify and then mark with code 9, which would archive the email in the basement of the department of state-never to be seen again.  The agent -- although he felt pressured--  refused the offer. Kennedy then makes the same offer to  the FBI head of counter intelligence.   And when this offer is refused, Kennedy knowing the criminal investigation is already underway  asks- will the FBI make a public statement about this?   When told they will not, he knows the coast is clear.  They'll deal with the FBI and the DOJ later,but for now Hillary can  publicly lie to all of us. 
So now Kennedy - one of the darkest characters in the  Clinton playbook - and that's saying something folks-skates.   But then the 302's are released.  Congress says wait a minute-that sounds like bribery, obstruction of justice, contempt of congress.  Is it?
The state department-the one that wouldn't allow the inspector general oversight and had no Hillary Clinton information available to the press -suggests that the FBI is lying.  Really?  Both  agents lying?  - maybe they misunderstood.  By the way, since the state department is willing to say that the FBI got it wrong, do the whole mounty.  How about the FBI director got it wrong when he said she shouldn't be charged?
Others say quid pro quo's, horse trading is what they do in Washington. We're just not used to watching them make sausage. Come on.  But not declassifying and destroying top-secret information on benghazi which is under federal subpoena to be retained and preserved of a pathological liar who is running to be commander in chief. 
Others say this is just what they do in dc : no crime
Since when in the history of American criminal justice does one have to announce: 'here ye here ye it is my intent to now commit this crime' before he can be held to account.
And if  there was no intent to prevent congress from knowing, answer this:  why did no one tell congress? Of at least the attempt to bribe federal officials or quid pro quo.  The FBI didn't (which makes me think they knew there would be no charges before they even started¦)  Kennedy sure as hell didn't. And I spoke with one: Trey Gowdy, the chair of the select committee on benghazi who told me  no one reached out to tell him that there was an attempt to prevent him and congress from getting the information he had subpoenaed."

WHAT PATRICK KENNEDY DID WAS A FELONY AND IT WAS DONE ON BEHALF OF THE CLINTONS.. BECAUSE HUSSEIN OBAMA IS INVOLVED. HE USED A FAKE NAME ON AN UNSECURE SERVER TO COMMUNICATE WITH HILLARY ABOUT SHARING SOME OF THE LOOT IN THE CLINTON FOUNDATION SCAM.

FELONY UNDER... 18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses

(a) For the purpose of this section—

(1)

the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;

(2)

the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and

(3)

the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.

(b) Whoever—

(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

(A)

to influence any official act; or

(B)

to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C)

to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;

(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A)

being influenced in the performance of any official act;

(B)

being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C)

being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;

(3)

directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;

(4)

directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom;shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

(c) Whoever—

(1) otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—

(A)

directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or

(B)

being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

(2)

directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;

(3)

directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

(d)

Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and testifying.

(e)

The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this title.

 

Can A Devout Practicing Catholic Vote For Clinton/Kaine? ABSOLUTELY NOT! Read and Share!

PLEASE SHARE ON PAGES WHERE YOU HAVE CATHOLIC WOMEN..

 

Can A Catholic Vote For Clinton/Kaine?
 
Attention Catholics: A vote for Clinton/Kaine (with full knowledge and approval of their declared pro-abortion platform) is a grave mortal sin and would in-effect be an action of self-excommunication.

This is a very serious matter for Catholics and may even require direct confession and absolution from a Bishop.

A Catholic cannot vote for, and in effect participate in, intrinsic evil. The Clinton/Kaine position and documented policy on ABORTION is intrinsic evil. Voting for Clinton/Kaine is approval of these heinous acts.

Just to set the record straight: Kaine is confused on the Roman Catholic Church’s teaching on Capital Punishment. Kaine has professed that the Death Penalty is the equivalent of Abortion. This is FALSE!

Roman Catholic teaching and doctrine on ABORTION is the equivalent to the murder in the highest degree – the murder of a helpless innocent child.

The Church teaching on the Death Penalty is eloquently explained here in the writings of Saint John Paul the Great:
“It is clear that, for the [purposes of punishment] to be achieved,the nature and extent of the punishment must be carefully evaluated and decided upon, and [the state] ought not go to the extreme of executing the offender except in cases of absolute necessity: in other words, when it would not be possible otherwise to defend society. Today however, as a result of steady improvements in the organization of the penal system, such cases are very rare, if not practically non-existent. —Pope John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae 56, emphasis in the original.”

Mr. Kaine is confused and creating scandal by espousing an intrinsically evil philosophy and policy.
Sen. Kaine’s claim that while he is personally against ABORTION, he must bow to the law of the land.
What if we applied Kaine’s argument to NAZI Germany? Could we condone the actions or inactions of NAZI officials who were personally opposed to the Death Camps and Gas Chambers but participated in the genocide because it was at the direction of der Führer – Adolph Hitler?
It was the law of the land – yes?

The Church considers ABORTION as the most serious of murders very much on the level of the Holocaust.
Roman Catholics must give this the most serious consideration before voting for the Clinton/Kaine ticket. It could very well be their ticket to Hell.

WHAT THEY ARE SAYING ABOUT THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN’S ANTI-CATHOLIC BIGOTRY

“[The Emails Illustrate] The Open Anti-Catholic Bigotry Of Her Senior Advisers, Who Attack The Deeply Held Beliefs And Theology Of Catholics.” – Joseph Cella, Founder Of The National Catholic Prayer Breakfast

WSJ Opinion: “It’s no secret that progressive elites despise religion, but it’s still striking to see their contempt expressed so bluntly as in the leaked email chains that include Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.” (WSJ, 10/13/16)

Angela Flood: “It is an attempt to undermine the faith.” (FOX News, 10/13/16)

Raymond Arroyo: “For someone to come and say, ‘I have a political organization to change your church to complete my political agenda or advance my agenda,’ I don’t know how anybody could embrace that.” (WaPo, 10/12/16)

Joseph Cella: The emails illustrate “the open anti-Catholic bigotry of her senior advisers, who attack the deeply held beliefs and theology of Catholics,” (Catholic News, 10/13/16)

Matt Schlapp: “Hillary likes to say she ‘goes high’ but she and her campaign are as low as a snake’s belly.” (Talk Media News, 10/12/16)

Mercedes Schlapp: “the comments are incredibly offensive.” (Talk Media News, 10/12/16)

Former Ambassador Jim Nicholson: “said the emails left him gasping. ‘I was greatly offended and disappointed when I read these comments made by senior members of Hillary Clinton’s staff.’”He said Clinton “absolutely ought to apologize. No religion should suffer this kind of denigration.” (Talk Media News, 10/12/16)

Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.): “’This attack is not limited to just Catholics.’ He implored on the public to “call on your bishops, call on your faith-based leaders” to condemn the remarks.” (Talk Media News, 10/12/16)

Newt Gingrich: “’Calista and I both feel this is an assault on Catholics.’ He referred to Clinton’s “bigoted, anti-Christian, anti-Catholic staff.” (Talk Media News, 10/12/16)

Calista Gingrich: “extremely offensive.” (Talk Media News, 10/12/16)

Speaker Paul Ryan: “If anything, these statements reveal the Clinton campaign’s hostile attitude toward people of faith in general. … All Americans of faith should take a long, hard look at this and decide if these are the values we want to be represented in our next president.” (Fortune, 10/13/16)

CNN: “Dozens of religious leaders who signed the statement expressed their ‘outrage at the demeaning and troubling rhetoric used by those within Secretary Clinton’s campaign.’” (CNN, 10/14/16)

Bill Donohue: “Yesterday, I stopped short of asking Hillary Clinton to fire John Podesta, her campaign chairman. In light of the latest Wikileaks revelations, she has no choice but to cut all ties with this man. The man is hell bent on creating mutiny in the Catholic Church and must therefore be fired.” (Newsmax, 10/13/16)

Washington Times: Clinton campaign mocks Catholics, Southerners, ‘needy Latinos’ in emails “Long before Hillary Clinton called millions of Americans a “basket of deplorables,” her top campaign advisers and liberal allies openly mocked Catholics, Southerners and a host of other groups, according to newly released emails that offer a stunning window into the vitriol inside the Clinton world less than a month before Election Day.” (Washington Times, 10/12/16)

Kellyanne Conway: “For 30 years Hillary Clinton has been openly hostile to practicing Catholics,” she said, citing Clinton’s support of partial birth abortion and the ObamaCare contraception mandate. “Now her staff is caught calling Catholics ‘backwards’ in emails seething with disdain.” (FOX News, 10/13/16)