Can MARCO RUBIO serve as President or Vice President. REad and tell me what you think!

As much as one may like a Candidate... you must love the Constitution  MORE.

The question must be addressed. Can Marco Rubio legally serve as President or Vice President of America. Is it allowed by the Constitution as it is written.. TODAY!

Rubio is, quite simply, not a "natural-born citizen" by the accepted legal, English-language standard as it has been known throughout American history. He was born in Florida to two non-U.S. citizen parents. 
 
I know this question is not a popular notion among Republicans who support either Rubio or Ted Cruz.
 
Remember it wasn't popular among Democrats when we challenged Obama's eligibility.

Shouldn't the Constitution always trump political expediency ?

You cannot be a Consistent Conservative with principles to Restore America .... IF you apply on standard of Obama and another standard for Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.


If we don't adhere to the Constitution on matters as significant as Presidential eligibility, then the Constitution ceases to be a meaningful document for guiding our nation. 

If not then, it becomes the kind of living document that many liberals have claimed it should be - ever changing to new circumstances. Who knows when someone can then challenge the 2nd amendment and change that too?

Here are the facts:

Mario and Oriales Rubio became naturalized U.S. citizens on Nov. 5, 1975, four years after Marco Rubio was born.

That's really all you have to know. That simple fact — one not in dispute — disqualifies him legally, barring an amendment to the Constitution or a complete and deliberate misinterpretation of the Constitution, from being president or vice president. 

Those are the only two offices in the U.S. that have such a requirement.

The definition of natural-born citizen approved by the first U.S. Congress can be seen in the Naturalization Act of 1790, which regarded it as a child born of two American parents. The law, specifying that a natural-born citizen need not be born on U.S. soil, stated: "The children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States."

While the act was repealed five years later, it, nevertheless, represented the will of the Congress that someone with dual loyalties not lead the U.S.

Rep.John Bingham of Ohio, a principal framer of the 14th Amendment, affirmed in a discussion in the House on March 9, 1866, that a natural-born citizen is "born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty." 

"The Law of Nations," a 1758 work by Swiss legal philosopher Emmerich de Vattel, was read by many of the American founders and informed their understanding of law later established in the Constitution.

Vattel specified that a natural-born citizen is born of two citizens and made it clear that the father's citizenship was a loyalty issue: "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. ... In order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."

Significantly, when the U.S. Senate resolved in 2008 that Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the Republican presidential nominee, was a natural-born citizen, it specified that his parents were American citizens.

The non-binding resolution, co-sponsored by then-Sen. Obama, stated that McCain — born to two American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936, "is a 'natural-born citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States." Slick don't you think? It made sure that McCain would not challenge Obama's Status! Two peas in an illegal pod scheme!

Of course, this raises a question: What about Obama? It's a good question — and goes right to heart of all the controversy about Obama's eligibility for the last four years. He is not eligible. He never was. It doesn't matter where he was born. It never did. What mattered — and still matters — is who his parents were. According to Obama and the limited and questionable documentation he has provided to date, his father was a Kenyan student who never became a U.S. citizen. 

Therefore, he NEVER met the test of eligibility. The fact that he has reluctantly provided highly questionable documentation to establish his birth in Hawaii is irrelevant, except that it suggests he is trying to obscure the real facts and the real substance of his eligibility. I guess if his father was Frank Marshall Davis we might have another discussion. A DNA test could help to set the record straight once and for all!!

But now... back to the issue of Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. It would by hypocritical and wrong and set a dangerous precedent for all section in our Constitution if we accept the Leftis notion that the Constitution is not ABSOLUTE!!
 
America permited an ineligible Obama to serve as president by a de facto changing of the constitutional standard through neglect and ignorance for the future. Now if we look the other way for our Candidates we have lost our moral high ground with regards to the Constitution and we open the door for interpretation of every ammendment!

Sure if America wants to have a national debate about the meaning of this requirement, let's have it in ways allowed by the Constitution. If not dissolve the Constitution and start anew ( that would be Revolution). But let's not allow conventional expedient wisdom on this matter to become so corrupted that we accept this on our side blithely as though it does NOT MATTER because it affects our Candidate's eligibility. If we do we have become political bastards just like them. We have no standing in the future!

And let's not stumble into nominating a president or vice president who tests the boundaries of eligibility in such a monumentally important election in 2016.

WE MUST STAND ON PRINCIPLE OR LOSE OUR REPUBLIC !

Can TED CRUZ legally serve as President or Vice President? Read and tell me what your think.

I like Ted Cruz.. I really Do!

....but in this extremely volatile dangerous world can we afford any controversy when it comes to choosing our NEXT President?  We cannot afford the controversy of the Obama Citizenship issue in our ranks. We need a total true focus on winning without any distractions

Here is the Cruz Citizenship Timeline (documented)
This is an authenticated timeline of known facts concerning the citizenship of Senator Ted Cruz.

I like Ted Cruz, 

I have been doing some detailed research and some gut wrenching soul searching and I have come to the conclusion that Ted Cruz is ineligible to be President or Vice President.

Sure there are many scholars who have argued that Cruz like Obama are both "Natural Born Citizens" but read the post and tell me why I am wrong? 

I really like Cruz and wanted him to be Donald Trump's VP and then go on to be the President 8 years from 2016 but I cannot in good conscience endorse him after the research I have done. Ted Cruz is a great American who would be a great VP to Trump and President in the future, but if I am to be consistent I cannot support Cruz in those two positions. I do this with a heavy heart, but the Constitution trumps my emotions.

FACTUAL CRUZ CITIZENSHIP TIMELINE

(Everything presented in this timeline is a matter of public record. All of it is based upon publicly reported events, public statements made by Rafael Cruz, Ted Cruz, officials with the Elect Ted movement or US and Canadian officials."

1957  - After working as a teen to help Fidel Castro gain power in Cuba, and being imprisoned for his actions by the Batista regime, Cuban Rafael Cruz applies for admittance to the University of Texas as a foreign student and enters the US on a four year student visa to attend four years of college. He is a Cuban citizen attending a US college on a student visa obtained through the US Consulate in Havana.

1961 – 1962 After graduating college at the University of Texas, and upon the expiration of his student visa, Cruz Sr. applied for and received “political asylum” and was issued a “green card”.  A green card is a permit to reside and work in the United States, without becoming a “citizen” of the United States, in this case, under political asylum from Castro’s Cuba. His citizenship status was that of a Cuban national living and working in the United States, under a green card work permit. According to US laws, the “green card” holder must maintain permanent resident status, and can be removed from the United States if certain conditions of this status are not met.

1964-1966  Cruz Sr. takes a few odd  jobs, marries and moves to Canada to work in the oil fields. The Cruz family resides in Canada for the next eight years. “I worked in Canada for eight years,”  Rafael Cruz says. “And while I was in Canada, I became a Canadian citizen.” – (From an interview with  NPR )

 1970  - Ted Cruz is born in Canada, to two parents who had lived in Canada for at least four years at that time, and had applied for and received Canadian citizenship under Canadian Immigration and  Naturalization Laws, as stated by Rafael Cruz. As a result, US statutes would have voided the prior “green card” status which requires among other things, permanent residency within the United States and obviously, not becoming a citizen of another country during the time frame of the US green card.

1974   The Cruz family moves to the United States when Ted is approximately four years old. Rafael Cruz has publicly stated that he remained a citizen of Canada until he renounced his Canadian citizenship when he applied for and became a US Naturalized citizen in 2005. As a result, his wife and son were also Canadian citizens, his son being born a citizen of Canada in 1970.

2005 - Rafael Cruz applies for legal US citizenship and renounces his Canadian citizenship. No record of Ted renouncing his Canadian citizenship or applying for US citizenship exists as of 2005

2013   Freshman Senator Ted Cruz is a rising star in the Tea Party movement, and calls for him to run for the White House begin. in July, Ted Cruz is questioned by the press about his interest in running for President, and the issue of his Canadian born citizenship is brought up

August 2013  As Ted’s political stock rises , so do press questions about his eligibility for office. Ted decides to quiet the questions by releasing his birth certificate, which now becomes absolute proof of  Ted’s Canadian citizenship at birth, 1970, Calgary. The release of  the Canadian birth records only serve to further fuel the controversy

Ted seeks legal counsel, as the media is now pressing members of Canadian Immigration and  Naturalization to clear the matter up, when instead, Canadian officials confirm the Ted Cruz was in fact  born a legal citizen of Canada, the son of two parents who had also applied for and received Canadian citizenship prior to Ted’s birth.

Generally speaking, under the Citizenship  Act of 1947, those born in Canada were automatically citizens at Birth unless their Parent was a  foreign diplomat.

So Ted’s Legal counsel advises Ted to “renounce his Canadian citizenship” in order to make himself eligible to run for the Presidency. Of course, renouncing one’s original citizenship only further proves one’s original citizenship.

May  2014  Ted Cruz legal counsel files to renounce Ted’s Canadian citizenship in an effort to make him eligible to run for high office under the natural born Citizen clause Article 11 in the US Constitution.

 

Austin, TX   Ted Cruz has given up his citizenship from his birth country of Canada.

 News that he had renounced his citizenship was first reported by the Dallas Morning News. The newspaper also broke that Cruz had dual Canadian- US Citizenship when he released his birth certificate in August.

However  the Constitution does not require that one be only an American citizen, but rather a natural born Citizen.

SO THE CONTROVERSY RAGES ON AS TO WHO IS A “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” IF OBAMA IS NOT.. THEN TED CRUZ IS NOT!!

My question remains .. CAN WE AFFORD THE DISTRACTION OF THE CONTROVERSY? AMERICA’S POSITION IS SO PRECARIOUS THAT I PREFER A CLEAN PATH

This problem exists for Marco Rubio as well.

A “natural born Citizen” of the United States is a child born in the USA of two (2) U.S. Citizens. The parents can be Citizens by Birth or they can be Citizens by Naturalization after immigrating to the USA. But to create a “natural born Citizen” of the United States both parents must be Citizens at the time the child is born in the USA. See this legal reference book used by the founders and framers of our Constitution: Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law, Vol.1 Chapter 19 Section 212, Emer de Vattel, 1758-1797.  The overwhelming majority (probably 85%+) of citizens in the United States are natural born Citizens.

This clause was added for future presidents as a national security clause. It is from the group of natural born Citizens that our founders prescribed in the presidential eligibility clause in Clause 5, Section 1 of Article II of the U.S. Constitution that we shall choose a President and Commander in Chief of our military as a strong check against foreign influence via birth allegiances on the person in that singular and most powerful office. One needs all three citizenship legs to be a natural born Citizen and have sole allegiance and claim on you at birth to one and only one country — the United States: 1. Born in the USA. 2. Father must be a U.S. Citizen (born or naturalized). 3. Mother must be U.S. Citizen (born or naturalized). Like a three legged stool if you take away any of these three citizenship legs of the Article II constitutional intent and requirement to being a natural born Citizen, i.e., being born with unity of citizenship in and sole allegiance to the USA, the child is born with more than one country’s citizenship and claim of allegiance/citizenship on them at their birth and thus they are NOT a natural born Citizen of the United States.  And as in the analogy of a stool designed to stand on three legs and it is missing a leg, it falls down, likewise the person’s claim to natural born Citizenship fails if the person does not have all three citizenship legs required to be a natural born Citizen at the time of their birth.

SO IF WE AS CONSERVATIVES ARE TO APPLY THE SAME STANDARD FOR ALL.. IT IS WITH A HEAVY HEART THAT I MUST CONCLUDE THAT TED CRUZ IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT. HE WOULD MAKE AN AWESOME ATTORNEY GENERAL.

OBAMA DITCHES US FLAG FOR ARABIC GOLD CURTAINS. Obama also has an Islamic Wedding Ring.

Have you too noticed that the decor at the White House has changed since Barack Hussein Obama moved in.

The Oval Office is now stripped of the traditional red, white, and blue, and replaced with middle eastern wallpaper, drapes, and decor. The hallway that he walks out of to talk to the press now has middle eastern chairs, drapes, etc. 

 

And the thing that has bothered me the most is the bright yellow drape behind him every time he speaks from the white house. Hideous Billious Yellow Gold.

It's supposed to be a Middle Eastern Style Curtain with exotic Middle Eastern style prints on it, to subtly symbolize his Islamic allegiances and has been there from the beginning. 

What is missing at Barack Hussein Obama's press conferences most of the time?

No it is not the teleprompters. See the other president's pics for a clue.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (aka BARRY SOETORO)



GEORGE WALKER BUSH

 

WILLIAM JEFFERSON BLYTHE CLINTON



GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH



RONALD WILSON REAGAN



That's right...no American flags and if there ever is one.. they are coyly and obscurely placed as an after thought so that the Hideous Yellow Gold Silk brocade is front and center.!!!

So do you believe it was just an accident! It is intentional. So I ask, why is it intentional?

He told you he would change America, didn't he? He also said all this....


Yes here is another Picture

Its a Gold Arabic Vanity Curtain...

 

THEN THERE IS OBAMA'S 

 WEDDING RING..

As a student at Harvard Law School, then-bachelor Barack Obama’s practice of wearing a gold band on his wedding-ring finger puzzled his colleagues.

Now, newly published photographs of Obama from the 1980s show that the ring Obama wore on his wedding-ring finger as an unmarried student is the same ring Michelle Robinson put on his finger at the couple’s wedding ceremony in 1992.
Moreover, according to Arabic-language and Islamic experts, the ring Obama has been wearing for more than 30 years is adorned with the first part of the Islamic declaration of faith, the Shahada: “There is no God except Allah.”
The Shahada is the first of the Five Pillars of Islam, expressing the two fundamental beliefs that make a person a Muslim: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is Allah’s prophet.
Sincere recitation of the Shahada is the sole requirement for becoming a Muslim, as it expresses a person’s
rejection of all other gods
Egyptian-born Islamic scholar Mark A. Gabriel, Ph.D., examined photographs of Obama’s ring at WND’s request and concluded that the first half of the Shahada is inscribed on it.
“There can be no doubt that someone wearing the inscription ‘There is no god except Allah’ has a very close connection to Islamic beliefs, the Islamic religion and Islamic society to which this statement is so strongly attached,” Gabriel told WND.

“Dreams from My Real Father” producer Joel Gilbert, an Arabic speaker and an expert on the Middle East, was the first to conclude that Obama’s ring, reportedly from Indonesia, bore an Islamic inscription.
Photographs published last week by the New Yorker from Obama’s time at Occidental College, taken by fellows students, indicate that the ring Obama wore three decades ago is the one he is wearing in the White House.
As WND reported in July, previously published photos have shown Obama wearing a gold band on his wedding-ring finger continuously from 1981 at Occidental, through graduation at Columbia in 1983, in a visit to Africa in 1988 and during his time at Harvard from 1988 to 1991. But none, until now, have displayed the ring with enough detail to identify it as the one he currently is wearing.
WND reported a satirical edition of the Harvard Law Review published by students in 1990 contains a mock Dewers Scotch profile advertisement poking fun at Obama. Among a list of Obama’s “Latest Accomplishments” is: “Deflecting Persistent Questioning About Ring On Left Hand.”
The comment suggests the ring was a subject of student curiosity at the time and that Obama was not forthcoming with an explanation.
He still has not explained why he wore the band on his wedding-ring finger before he married Michelle.
The Occidental ring
The photographs published last week by New Yorker magazine indicate Obama was wearing the ring at Occidental College.
One photo shows Obama sitting alongside Occidental roommate Hasan Chandoo in 1981, apparently waiting for a meal to be served.

Obama’s extended left hand clearly shows the ring

In the above photo, the ring’s design can be seen, including a series of parallel bars that distinguish its outer circumference.
Declaration
Gabriel, born to Muslim parents in Upper Egypt, grew up immersed in Islamic culture. He memorized the Quran at age of 12 and graduated in 1990 with a Masters degree from the prestigious Al-Azhar University in Cairo, the preeminent Sunni Muslim institution of learning.
He explained that on Obama’s ring, the declaration “There is no god except Allah” (La Ilaha Illallah) is inscribed in two sections, one above the other. On the upper section, “There is no god” is written in Arabic letters, from right to left: Lam, Alif, Alif, Lam, Ha. On the lower section is “except god,” written in Arabic letters from right to left: Alif, Lam, Alif, Alif, Lam, Lam, Ha.
In the lower section, the word “Allah” is written partially on top of the word “except,” noted Gabriel, the author of “Islam and Terrorism” and “Journey Inside the Mind of an Islamic Terrorist.” It is common in Islamic art and Arabic calligraphy, especially when expressing Quranic messages on jewelry, to artfully place letters on top of each other to fit them into the allotted space.
The exhibit below shows how the Arabic inscription fits over the two parts of the Obama ring.

“There is no God except Allah” overlaid on Obama ring

‘I have known Islam on three continents’
Filmmaker Joel Gilbert, an expert on Islamic history, noted Obama wore the ring during his high-profile speech in Cairo on June 4, 2009, in the first months of his presidency.
“Now we have a new context for what Obama meant when he told the Islamic audience in Cairo that he has ‘known Islam on three continents,” Gilbert said. “He also told the Cairo audience that he considered it part of his responsibility as president of the United States ‘to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.’ All religious Muslims are by definition required to defend Islam.”
The Obama wedding ring
The ring was mentioned in a New York Times article in 2009 recounting the Obamas’ wedding.

Obama wedding ring, Huffington Post, March 18, 2010

In the story, Jodi Kantor described its “intricate gold design,” noting it came from Barack Obama’s boyhood home of Indonesia and was not traditional, like Michelle’s.
Kantor wrote:
Just before the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. pronounced Barack Obama and Michelle Robinson man and wife on the evening of Oct. 3, 1992, he held their wedding rings – signifying their new, enduring bonds – before the guests at Trinity United Church of Christ. Michelle’s was traditional, but Barack’s was an intricate gold design from Indonesia, where he had lived as a boy.
There was no mention in the article that Obama already had been wearing the ring for more than a decade.
The photos of the ring from the 1980s can be compared with more recent photos, such as the ones published by the Huffington Post in 2010 in an article by Anya Strzemien, “Obama’s ‘Intricate’ Indonesian Wedding Band

SURE ITS ALL CO-INCIDENTAL RIGHT ???

gold, Arab vanity curtain.

gold, Arab vanity curtain.

If you want a strong Republican Led Congress for the next 12 month... WE NEED NEWT GINGRICH

󾔰  FRIENDS. IF YOU WANT A STRONG REPUBLICAN CONTROLLED CONGRESS WHO WILL STAND UP TO HUSSEIN OBAMA.....YOU HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO DO THIS..

 ➡Please read and share and Act Now. We have 10 Days from October 10th before the Vote in the House 󾔰

 ➡ We Conservatives desperately need a SPEAKER of the House of Representatives who has proved his Political Conservative Cred (once again) during the 2012 Republican Presidential Campaign and yes actually almost beat Romney.

󾓊 Newt Gingrich is the most experienced House of Representative's Politician who could fill the seat of SPEAKER.

 ➡ ➡ ➡ Here is the LINK to find the number of your Congressman

                        http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/

This Is Newt's Facebook Page. Go there and ask him to accept the Position.

                   ❌    https://www.facebook.com/newtgingrich  ❌

Some other good names have been floated like Allen West and and Rudy Gulliani and others but the fact is that to be a competent Speaker of the House.. you need a "specialized skill set" and not just an ideology. Its a SKILL. NEWT HAS THEM. 

Here are some of his accomplishments. Some Kool Aid Drinkers will call him an NWO... or a Progressive... but these facts are re-searchable. OK let me also be clear I do not agree with him 100%. Like his view of the Pope... but being Speaker of the house.. is about Containing HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE LEFTIST SENATE AND THE OLIGARCHS! 

Yes...Newt has a long history of accomplishments. He faced down GHW Bush over proposed tax increases; the face-off actually shut down the government. It led Bush to endorse Romney. Yes its GHW Bush who is the NWO, Agenda 21 president & he does not endorse Newt.

He faced down Clinton, cut spending, balanced the budget, reduced the debt and reformed welfare. He is the only person in modern history to cut the size of government. Clinton said he can work with people to get things done.

He ushered in a Republican take-over of the house for the first time in 40 years; everyone said it couldn’t be done.

The Washington Times has called Newt Gingrich “the indispensable leader” and Time magazine, in naming him Man of the Year for 1995, said, “Leaders make things possible. Exceptional leaders make them inevitable. Newt Gingrich belongs in the category of the exceptional.”

Newt served on the Defense Policy Board under President George W. Bush, which provided strategic counsel to the Pentagon and Secretary of Defense on how to better address threats facing the United States. He is also the longest-serving teacher of the Joint War Fighting course for Major Generals at Air University and taught officers from all five services.

In 2003, Newt founded the Center for Health Transformation to develop free market healthcare reforms to foster a 21st Century System of health and healthcare that is centered on the individual

He is the only Speaker in the history of Modern America to have

* Four consecutive balanced budgets

* Over $500 billion of debt paid off

* Major welfare reform accomplished

* 11 million new jobs for America

* Unemployment falling to under 4%.

It takes negotiating skills and a firm understanding of issues and procedures and a whole lot of courage to dare a lawless president to do something illegal.

Some of you are touting Paul Ryan.... !! Really ? Nice guy but he choked when Joe Biden said "Boo" in the VP Debates.

  

Newt Gingrich for Speaker

Republicans should rattle the political system by bringing back the former speaker.

There are a number of things that recommend him for the job – most of all the fact that it is almost certain he doesn't want it. His return to the office would not mark a return to power or to the political life so much as it might be the act of a modern day Cincinnatus returning to the arena not out of ambition but because he is needed. It would be a call by Conservative America for a champion to deal with a increasingly despotic President backed by an emboldened Leftist/Progressive movement that sees abject weakness in the current gaggle of Republicans.

Gingrich is primarily a teacher. As the restored head of the Republican conference in the House, he would have the opportunity to mentor his more junior colleagues in the art of governing and leadership modeled on his successful "Listen, Learn, Help, Lead" formula.

As to the complaints from the back benches that Boehner and his leadership team have been too timid and too accommodating when it comes to taking on Obama, remember: Gingrich is the man who took on Bill Clinton, who on his worst day was a far cagier and far better politician than Obama will ever be at his absolute best. Gingrich will get more than he has to give up.

So come on people be smart and swallow your political pride and induct some who can do the job and does not actually want it. He will have no ulterior motive than to help HIS country survive the last of a LAWLESS Period in American History.

Look we will EVEN HAVE ONE EXTRA VOTE IN THE HOUSE!!

☎ Please contact your Congressman and blast his office with demands that he Vote for Newt Gingrich as Speaker. We need 247 Votes....☎

Here is the LINK to find the number of your Congressman

                        http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/

This Is Newt's Facebook Page. Go there and ask him to accept the Position.

                   ❌    https://www.facebook.com/newtgingrich  ❌

PLEASE SHARE ...

More Info...

When you need the "Plumbing fixed"... you call the Plumber. When you need stuff Exterminated you call the Exterminator.

Look do not let your heart rule your logical mind. Using all the rules of Congress is not for someone who has not been there and done that! This position needs someone who has the experience and the skills in Congress to maneuver through all the arcane rules and regulations and play to win.

There are only a few people with the experience of how to negotiate with the asshole who is President right now ( That would be Obama ) like New Gingrich can. Remember his fiery Debate Performances in 2012?

He is a Conservative and I challenge anyone to produce any evidence to the Contrary. ( A video with Pelosi is not proof.. get real! )

And here is more proof that he left hates his guts:

http://therightscoop.com/must-read-the-truth-about-gingric…/

YES WE NEED A MAN LIKE NEWT GINGRICH FOR SPEAKER:

Please read my post and understand my Logic.

We need an outsider with no POLITICAL "RE ELECTION" AGENDA OF HIS OWN THAT MAKES HIM NEED TO APPEASE.

HE HAS BEEN THERE BEFORE... HE HAS THE GUTS TO SHUT DOWN GOVERNMENT TO REIN IN SPENDING AND HAS WON AGAINST BILL CLINTON.

HE KNOWS THE MOVES AND THE EXPERIENCE!

READ HIS CONTRACT WITH AMERICA THAT HE GOT THROUGH !!

http://www.rialto.k12.ca.us/rhs/planetwhited/AP%20PDF%20Docs/Unit%2014/CONTRAC7.PDF

NEW GINGRICH... WAIT YOU SAY....HE IS NOT IN THE HOUSE.. YES.. ALL THE BETTER..

Read MY POSTULATION.. THEN TELL ME WHY YOU DISAGREE!

✨

CONSIDER AND SHARE THIS ON YOUR WALL AND IN EVERY GROUP YOU BELONG TO... TIME IS SHORT !!

THIS COULD BE A STOP GAP MEASURE!! CONSIDER THIS OPTION PATRIOTS:

NEWT Gingrich for Speaker of the House of Representatives: He worked with Clinton and knows how to kick DEMOCRAT ass!!

Here is the Scenario.

THE Speaker of the United States House of Representatives:

The Constitution DOES NOT require that the Speaker be an elected Member of Congress.

The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives (or Speaker of the House) is the presiding officer of the chamber. The office was established in 1789 by Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which states in part, "The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker...

The Constitution DOES NOT require that the Speaker be an elected Member of Congress.

The Speaker is second in the United States presidential line of succession, after the Vice President and ahead of the President pro tempore of the U.S. Senate. The speakership of the House is a leadership position in the majority party and the office-holder actively works to set that party's legislative agenda; the office is therefore endowed with considerable political power. The Speaker does not usually personally preside over debates, instead delegating the duty to freshman members of the House from the majority party.

Aside from duties relating to heading the House and the majority political party, the Speaker also performs administrative and procedural functions, and represents his or her congressional district.

Selection

The House of Representatives elects the speaker of the house on the first day of every new Congress. Each party nominates a candidate. There is usually some degree of consensus within each party's leadership as to who the favored candidate will be. Whoever receives a simple majority of the votes is elected. The new Speaker is then sworn in by the Dean of the House, the chamber's longest-serving member.

Click on the Link here and you can see there is no requirement that the SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE... be an elected member. Its elects a Speaker by SIMPLE MAJORITY!!

NEWT GINGRICH FOR SPEAKER...WHAT DO YOU SAY ?? IF YOU THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA..AND THAT HE WOULD PUT A CHECK ON OBAMA... WITHOUT HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT A POLITICAL BACKLASH SINCE HE IS NOT RUNNING FOR ANY SEAT!!

COPY PASTE AND SHARE IF YOU THINK THIS WOULD BE A GREAT IDEA TO EXPLORE!

Read this to understand  the process of selecting a Speaker

http://www.shmoop.com/constitution/article-1-section-2.html

How Eisenhower Dealt With America’s First Illegal Alien Crisis.... Lesson For Donald Trump. Do not be afraid!

FYI READ AND SHARE...

 

🔨 THIS IS A HISTORY LESSON: How Eisenhower Dealt With America’s First Illegal Alien Crisis 🔨

🌟Read and Share! READ WHERE THE TERM OPERATION "WETBACK" CAME FROM!! 🌟

This is not the first time the US has dealt with an illegal immigration problem. Only last time it was dealt with in a decidedly swifter and sterner manner. The response, coordinated by President Dwight Eisenhower, resulted in nearly 3 million illegal immigrants being sent home. We can do it again.
During his administration, Eisenhower became the first American president forced to deal with problems stemming from illegal immigration. Only, in Eisenhower’s time the politically correct culture of liberal sensitivities had yet to emerge. There was not much in the way of sympathy for those who had crossed into the country illegal.
Eisenhower told the New York Times exactly what had caused the problem: “The rise in illegal border crossing by Mexican [illegal immigrants] to a current rate of more than 1 million cases a year has been accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of the federal government.”
‘Ike’ took quick and decisive action. He used 1,075 Border Patrol Agents to seal the border. In doing so, he achieved a task our government today deems impossible with a force that is 10% larger. Once the border was sealed, Eisenhower went about the process of removing the millions of illegal aliens.
In June of 1954, he appointed retired General Joseph “Jumpin’ Joe” Swing to head “Operation Wetback,” which sent local and federal officials on sweeps of Mexican neighborhoods looking for illegals.
Within one month 50,000 illegals had been captured and deported, while nearly half a million more fled the country to avoid arrest. By September 80,000 more illegals had been removed from the state of Texas alone, and between 500,000-700,000 more had fled the country.
These illegals weren’t just dropped at the border; Swing arranged for buses and trains to take immigrants deep into Mexico before releasing them. Tens of thousands more were shipped by boat from Texas to Vera Cruz, Mexico.
Using less man power and resources than the federal government has today, Eisenhower was able to seal the border and send nearly 3 million illegal aliens home. The policy had the added effectiveness of deterring future illegal crossings.
Whereas today illegal immigrants are given government aid and college tuition, policies which have undoubtedly contributed to an increase in illegal immigration.
The economic effects aside, the level of illegal immigration today represents a grave national security concern. Whereas Eisenhower’s policies deterred such activity, President Obama’s executive amnesty will only further encourage the flow of these illegal aliens over our southern border.
This skews our Voting electorate even if they do not vote because based on the census the Electoral College awards seats based on population and for example California gets 5 additional Electoral College votes based on the Illegal Aliens in California and that neutralizes smaller state like North Dakota and Montana who have only 3 Electoral College Votes.
THIS MUST STOP.. and DONALD TRUMP IS THE MAN WHO WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

FACEBOOK BLOCKS ME AGAIN FOR 30 DAYS.. 10/9/15

ANOTHER 30 DAY BLOCK BY FACEBOOK..

THE BANNED ME FOR 30 DAYS for this..

Message from facebook:
We Removed Something You Posted We removed the post below because it doesn't follow the Facebook Community Standards:

John Gaultier

Until we feel that the threat to Regular Americans has subsided... I believe we must plan to Intern and re educate Muslims or deport them. hey.. don't forget we did it to the Germans, Italians and Japanese during WW-2 Do not forget.. The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim The Beltway Snipers were Muslims The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims The London Subway Bombers were Muslims The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims The Kenyan U.S. Embassy Bombers were Muslims The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims The Beslan Russian School Attackers were Muslims The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims The Ohio Thug who sliced a woman's head off was a Muslim The Shooters at the Texas Paint Mohammed Cartoons were Muslims The Oregon College Shooter who asked everyone their Religion was Muslim The LIST GOES ON AND ON!! FEELING SAFE YET? OBAMA IS THEIR CONDUIT..



THIS GOES AGAINST COMMUNITY STANDARDS??

WTF

Oregon Shooter's True Identity Hidden by Obama and Cabal

Oregon Mass Shooter On Terror List Obama Refused To Take From Russia. They used this man to further Gun Control, just like in Sandy Hook.

RAW INFO... FOR IMMEDIATE REVIEW AND SHARING!!

The Federal Security Services (FSB) is reporting today that an American black-Islamist terror suspect, who yesterday committed an act of mass murder in the State of Oregon (United States), had been included on a list of 87,000 “known/suspected” Islamic terrorists that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) refused last month to accept from the Federation due to its not being “politically viable in the present atmosphere”.
According to this report, the black-Islamist terrorist who committed this act of terror, Chris Harper Mercer, had previously been indentified by electronic intelligence specialists within the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) as being an Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) adherent after he had attempted to gain passage to Syria via Turkey during the first week of September, 2015.
By the Obama regime refusing to accept this terror list from the Federation, this report continues, Mercer was able to accomplish his terror act when yesterday he killed 9 people and wounded 7 others at the Umpqua Community College prior to his being shot and killed by local US police forces.

Most critical to note about this FSB report is that where it ends, the mysterious, and hugely read, Russian publication Reedus (Ridus.ru) continues—and to fully understand this information one must note that Russian intelligence agencies (SVR/FSB) frequently use Reedus to put information into the public sphere that otherwise would have serious international consequences should the government be found to be behind it—thus giving Reedus its current status known as “a Kremlin resource” and an “agency of Orthodox journalism”. [Русский]
And the information relating to the black-Islamist terrorist Mercer “leaked” into Reedus by the SVR/FSB is, to say the least, shocking and disturbing–including that immediately after the Oregon mass shooting, his Internet personal profile was changed from his true identity as an ISIS/ISIL terror supporter to one of his being a “white conservative Republican”. [Русский]

Also important to be noted was Mercer’s association with the ISIS/ISIL terrorist Mahmoud Ali Ehsani, who is banned in Russia [Русский], and was one of only two of Mercer’s MySpace “friends” and who praises the Islamic State, calls for the killing of Jews and glorifies in pictures on his MySpace page his rapture of these terrorists.

With the true knowledge of Mercer being known as the black-Islamic terrorist he truly was, information which the Obama regime refused to accept from Russia, his mass terror act in identifying and killing Christians becomes immediately understandable.
As to why the Obama regime and their propaganda media lapdogs are disguising the truth from the American people about this horrific act of Islamic terror against them, especially to the families of the dead and wounded, it is not known—but shouldn’t really surprise anyone as that government has been nothing but a mountain of lies for years.

Oregon College Gunman Identified As Chris Harper Mercer- Update: Only Two Myspace Friends, One Who Praises Islamic Terrorists, Urges Killing Of Jews-Update: Admired Black Gay Killer Who Shot Journalists On Live T.V.

Obama is already politicizing without even knowing the facts behind it. If the students said they were Christians, the shooter shot them in the head.
Via Washington Times:

Chris Harper Mercer, 26, has been identified as the gunman who killed nine people on Thursday at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon, according to news reports.
Mercer was killed in a shootout with Douglas County sheriff’s deputies, according to Sheriff John Hanlin.
Mercer reportedly was not a student at the college. The New York Times, quoting law enforcement officials, reported that he lived in the Roseburg area.
Mercer reportedly demanded to know the religions of those around him before opening fire.
Four guns — three handguns and a long gun — were reportedly found at the scene.

Here’s another view:

Update:
Mercer still has a Myspace up, with two connections, a man and a woman. The man, Mahmoud Ali Ehsani, appears to have a great passion for Islamists, posting multiple pictures of ‘Mujahideen’ from every country with Islamic terrorists and saying ‘kill the Jews’.


Update:

He appeared to be enamored of the IRA. He also praised Roanoke killed Vester Flanagan:

Mercer admired black gay killer Vester Flanagan who shot the reporter and cameraman on live T.V.:
In a blog linked to that identity, Harper-Mercer expressed admiration for Roanoke shooter Vester Flanagan.
People “like him have nothing left to live for,” Harper-Mercer wrote on August 31. “On an interesting note, I have noticed that so many people like him are all alone and unknown, yet when they spill a little blood, the whole world knows who they are. … A man who was known by no one, is now known by everyone. His face splashed across every screen, his name across the lips of every person on the planet, all in the course of one day. Seems the more people you kill, the more you’re in the limelight. “

Oregon arrow turned black jihadist LIH

Yesterday, 12:58 | Pavel Gorokhov

Before you pull the trigger, the man asked the victims of what faith they adhere. The killer has been in contact with radical Islamists, and it belongs to the white race - is questionable.

0

- +

24

156

34

0

Opened fire at a US college campus Umpkva Oregon man intentionally killed Christians.
The victims of 26-year-old Chris Harper Mercer, opened fire at the Oregon College became ten people before he was shot dead by police.
Another seven were injured. Three of them are in critical condition.
The father of one of the victims said that before the murder Mercer interest of future victims, what religion they follow.
"If you are Christians, then after a few seconds you will see God" - these words, according to the father of 18-year-old Anastasia Boylan, said the shooter before you proceed with the killings.
Journalists Theconservativehistorian found that on the page Oregon arrow when mySpace only 2 pins, one of which Mahmoud Ali Ehsani - Islamic terrorist banned in Russia and other countries of the radical group "Islamic State".
As proof, they published photos from the page Ali Ehsani:

In this race Mercer, according to one of the leaders of «Black Lives Matter» (The life of the black matter) Johnson, was deliberately "correct" media.
"We can confirm that he was not white, contrary to numerous media reports," - said Johnson, known for his calls to "kill the whites."

Chris Harper Mercer, according to Johnson, is an African-American Islamic jihadists page is hacked Internet trolls. They changed the profile information of Mercer to represent his white conservative Republican.

As evidence of the pro-Islamic ideology Oregon arrow journalists published several messages from Twitter Mercer.
The media also reported that the killer was discussing plans for the Internet to organize the shooting, as dreamed of being the hero of the news. On the bulletin board 4Chan he called "normal guys" do not go to school on October 1 when they learn in the northwest. Post one took seriously. Now, investigators are continuing to study the correspondence Mercer on the web.
Student Chris Harper appeared in Mercer campus on October 1 at 9 am. He chose the largest audience to shoot as many as possible. Since he had a three pistols and one rifle. It was found that the Mercer committed the massacre alone, the first shot in the head killing the teacher.
After the massacre at the college, US President Barack Obama urged to tighten control over the circulation of weapons. Opponents of such a decision argue that the weapons will help protect students from such crimes.
The journalists noted that Obama, in his speech said nothing about the identity of the killer and "forgot to mention" that the United States - the only country that sponsors terrorists and drug cartels LIH.
As the author points out, Obama will never recognize the massacre after an attack from jihadists created with the direct participation of the US leader's group "Islamic State".
"As the president said," thoughts and prayers "are not enough. Except when they include "Allahu Akbar!" And personal prayers every night fighters "- sums up the journalist.


ALL FROM THE BOWELS OF THE INTERNET.. A COVER UP IS UNDERWAY..

COPY THIS .. IT WILL BE REMOVED IN SOME WAY!

FACEBOOK FACISTS CENSOR ME FOR CALLING JORGE RAMOS A "MEXICAN LINE JUMPING BEANER"

The Politically Correct Bullshit Of Facebook is out in full force.

FACEBOOK MUST BE ATTACKED AND DESTROYED IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION

I have been blocked and banned from facebook for my conservative views for 30 days at a time 15 times in 3 years.

Meanwhile the Progressives and Islamists spout their views against us day in and day out!

Facebook and its censorship department needs to be taught a lesson they will remember!

Patriots you know what to do !!

RRR

CHINA WORKING TO DESTROY US DOLLAR.. ITS OUR GOVERNMENTS FAULT.

BE PREPARED!! THE DOLLAR IS GOING DOWN!

WARNING.. THE DISASTER IS COMING.. AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO EXCEPT PRAY!!

China Declares Currency War on US Dollar Ahead of September Showdown
IMF’s Christine Lagarde gave a press conference in Washington DC making September 15th the deadline for the US to agree to give China more power within the International Monetary Fund.

Here, from Reuters:

“The IMFC, which is one of the key governing institutions of the IMF, has decided that if by the 15th of September this matter is not resolved satisfactorily, then we have to select the interim step that we will take … to make sure that there is an element of down payment on the quota increase…”

It’s not quite clear what Lagarde intends to do but the problem is a serious one. The US is obviously reluctant to cede too much control of the IMF to China and other developing countries. If Lagarde pushes too hard, she may significantly degrade relations between the US and China.

Not that they need further souring. Against US wishes, China has just devalued the yuan and the move “clobbered” markets around the world and especially in the US.

Reports were that when the damage was tallied after Tuesday’s trading, the MSCI All World Index of global shares had fallen 1 percent. US exports will no doubt suffer as well.

Bill McQuaker, co-head of the multi-asset team at Henderson Global Investors reportedly commented, “What is good for growth in China is unfortunately bad for everybody else.”

Of course it’s questionable whether a depreciated currency is ever “good.” In this topsy-turvy Keynesian world we live in, people have gotten the idea that when their currency is debased the economy will somehow improve.

This is only one fallacy that people hold. Another is that the US military-industrial complex is a necessary evil that is dedicated to providing a bulwark of national security to keep people safe. Nothing could be further from the truth. A military-industrial complex, as Dwight D. Eisenhower warned, is inevitably going to manufacture wars and military crises to stay in business and increase funding. Like it’s done for decades now.

China is going down this road, using its fiat-currency (the yuan) to fund a huge military binge. It is contesting certain waters in the South Pacific and has started building islands in the area. To protect the islands, China has increased its air-force presence and has also started to build more sophisticated planes and ships.

Chinese “aggression” has the US reportedly considering the use of its own naval and air power to confront the Chinese. John Kerry has traveled to China to personally make the US stance clear. Meanwhile, Chinese President Xi Jinping is due in Washington in September to discuss the military standoff.

It’s not clear if Kerry will discuss the festering IMF issue, but these three points of contention – as mentioned above – certainly constitute a trio of potentially disastrous sore spots.

There’s no doubt that the corrupt and dictatorial Chinese government is panicked by recent events. China’s stock market has lopped off over US$1 trillion in wealth in a dramatic and unexpected bear market.

The Chinese government has a kind of pact with its people. In return for providing prosperity, the Chinese people cede political power to the ruling party. And their hold on power is even more tenuous than in the US or Europe which means the Chinese government is liable to be a lot more desperate as a result.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see a good deal more tension – if not possible military action – in the fall, if the Chinese economic situation doesn’t improve. And there are plenty of things a desperate Chinese government can do to temporarily stabilize the Chinese situation that will have a destabilizing effect on the world economy.

China, for instance, could further debase the yuan, crushing the feeble “recovery” that US and European officials currently insist is taking place in the West. Alternatively China could begin dumping its trillion dollar reserve of US currency – and maybe it already has begun. There are reports to that effect.

Such dumping could set US price inflation soaring, forcing the Fed’s hand on a significant rate hike and plunge the US into a Greater Depression.

But avoid the worst case and one still faces significant difficulties. The combination of currency debasement, currency dumping and increased military tensions could heat up in the fall considerably.

What really is catching our attention is on how these events all seem to be coming to a head in September. Even Christine Lagarde has mentioned the exact date of September 15 of this year as a deadline… this is the exact date that we have mentioned in our viral video, “SHEMITAH EXPOSED: Financial Crisis Planned For September” as being the possible beginning date of a crisis. And then to have the Chinese President also coming to the US in September has us wondering if the crisis we are expecting will be China/Yuan/SDR related.

The Chinese have a saying, “may you live in interesting times” – and September looks increasingly interesting on a number of fronts.

GOOD GOD.. ITS ALMOST TOO LATE !!

An Illegal alien has a child on American soil, the Constitution does not require the child be granted American citizenship.

Are children of illegal aliens born on American soil U.S. citizens? The Constitution says no. 

Here is the actual language of the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” 

Birthright citizenship only belongs to those who were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States the moment they were born. But children of illegal aliens are not. 

Their parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States but rather of their home country, which is why they can be immediately deported if identified and apprehended. You can’t do that to an American citizen. 

Since the parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, neither are their children. They are, in plain fact, not citizens of the U.S. by birth. 

This is why the children of diplomats who are born on U.S. soil are not U.S. citizens. Since their parents are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, neither are the children. 

We are all familiar with the concept of “diplomatic immunity,” which diplomats often use to get themselves and their children out of trouble on American soil by claiming that the children are not under the authority of American law. All the American government can do in such circumstances is send them back to their home country. That is, all they can do is deport them. 

SO: 

If an illegal alien has a child on American soil, the Constitution does not require the child be granted American citizenship. 

Congress can give citizenship to anyone it wants, but the Fourteenth Amendment only commands citizenship to persons born on U.S. soil to parents who are not citizens of a foreign country... 

While many erroneously claim that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born on American soil, the reality is that is not the law and has never been the law. Current immigration law–found at 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)–specifies that a baby born on American soil to (1) a foreign ambassador, (2) head of state, or (3) foreign military prisoner is not an American citizen. 

But if the view promoted by the Left that citizenship is automatic (and parroted by many in the middle and even on the Right who have not seriously studied the issue) is correct, then those three exceptions would be unconstitutional. The debate over birthright citizenship turns on what the Citizenship Clause means by the words “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” 

Every provision of the Constitution has a fixed meaning. Because only “We the People” can adopt a constitutional provision–all 27 amendments in the Constitution were proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, then ratified by three-fourths of the states–the only legitimate way to interpret the Constitution is in accordance with the original meaning of those terms. 

So the question becomes: What was the meaning of the Jurisdiction Clause in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified? One of the best tools for determining that is looking at the Civil Rights Act of 1866, enacted the same year that the Fourteenth Amendment was written by Congress... 

The Civil Rights Act included a provision to define American citizenship to secure it for former slaves. It read, “All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States...”

  

[T]he Civil Rights Act’s parallel language, “and not subject to any foreign power,” instead shows the Jurisdiction Clause excludes all citizens of any foreign country. The Citizenship Clause was intended to overrule the most infamous Supreme Court case in American history–the 1857 Dred Scott case–and ensure free blacks born in America could not be denied citizenship. It was never designed to make a citizen of every child born to a foreigner. 

The way forward is simple. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives power to Congress to “enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” 

Donald Trump in 2016 will work with a conservative Congress, which has the sole authority under the Constitution to determine immigration policy, to enact a law specifying in no uncertain terms that children of illegal aliens born on American soil are not American citizens. 

Some well-meaning Republican candidates are calling for an amendment to the Constitution to ban birthright citizenship. But in truth the Constitution does NOT need to be amended. It only needs to be applied.

Bottom line: Are children of illegal aliens American citizens? No. Why? Because the Constitution says they aren’t.

ANY QUESTIONS?