FACEBOOK FACISTS CENSOR ME FOR CALLING JORGE RAMOS A "MEXICAN LINE JUMPING BEANER"

The Politically Correct Bullshit Of Facebook is out in full force.

FACEBOOK MUST BE ATTACKED AND DESTROYED IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION

I have been blocked and banned from facebook for my conservative views for 30 days at a time 15 times in 3 years.

Meanwhile the Progressives and Islamists spout their views against us day in and day out!

Facebook and its censorship department needs to be taught a lesson they will remember!

Patriots you know what to do !!

RRR

CHINA WORKING TO DESTROY US DOLLAR.. ITS OUR GOVERNMENTS FAULT.

BE PREPARED!! THE DOLLAR IS GOING DOWN!

WARNING.. THE DISASTER IS COMING.. AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO EXCEPT PRAY!!

China Declares Currency War on US Dollar Ahead of September Showdown
IMF’s Christine Lagarde gave a press conference in Washington DC making September 15th the deadline for the US to agree to give China more power within the International Monetary Fund.

Here, from Reuters:

“The IMFC, which is one of the key governing institutions of the IMF, has decided that if by the 15th of September this matter is not resolved satisfactorily, then we have to select the interim step that we will take … to make sure that there is an element of down payment on the quota increase…”

It’s not quite clear what Lagarde intends to do but the problem is a serious one. The US is obviously reluctant to cede too much control of the IMF to China and other developing countries. If Lagarde pushes too hard, she may significantly degrade relations between the US and China.

Not that they need further souring. Against US wishes, China has just devalued the yuan and the move “clobbered” markets around the world and especially in the US.

Reports were that when the damage was tallied after Tuesday’s trading, the MSCI All World Index of global shares had fallen 1 percent. US exports will no doubt suffer as well.

Bill McQuaker, co-head of the multi-asset team at Henderson Global Investors reportedly commented, “What is good for growth in China is unfortunately bad for everybody else.”

Of course it’s questionable whether a depreciated currency is ever “good.” In this topsy-turvy Keynesian world we live in, people have gotten the idea that when their currency is debased the economy will somehow improve.

This is only one fallacy that people hold. Another is that the US military-industrial complex is a necessary evil that is dedicated to providing a bulwark of national security to keep people safe. Nothing could be further from the truth. A military-industrial complex, as Dwight D. Eisenhower warned, is inevitably going to manufacture wars and military crises to stay in business and increase funding. Like it’s done for decades now.

China is going down this road, using its fiat-currency (the yuan) to fund a huge military binge. It is contesting certain waters in the South Pacific and has started building islands in the area. To protect the islands, China has increased its air-force presence and has also started to build more sophisticated planes and ships.

Chinese “aggression” has the US reportedly considering the use of its own naval and air power to confront the Chinese. John Kerry has traveled to China to personally make the US stance clear. Meanwhile, Chinese President Xi Jinping is due in Washington in September to discuss the military standoff.

It’s not clear if Kerry will discuss the festering IMF issue, but these three points of contention – as mentioned above – certainly constitute a trio of potentially disastrous sore spots.

There’s no doubt that the corrupt and dictatorial Chinese government is panicked by recent events. China’s stock market has lopped off over US$1 trillion in wealth in a dramatic and unexpected bear market.

The Chinese government has a kind of pact with its people. In return for providing prosperity, the Chinese people cede political power to the ruling party. And their hold on power is even more tenuous than in the US or Europe which means the Chinese government is liable to be a lot more desperate as a result.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see a good deal more tension – if not possible military action – in the fall, if the Chinese economic situation doesn’t improve. And there are plenty of things a desperate Chinese government can do to temporarily stabilize the Chinese situation that will have a destabilizing effect on the world economy.

China, for instance, could further debase the yuan, crushing the feeble “recovery” that US and European officials currently insist is taking place in the West. Alternatively China could begin dumping its trillion dollar reserve of US currency – and maybe it already has begun. There are reports to that effect.

Such dumping could set US price inflation soaring, forcing the Fed’s hand on a significant rate hike and plunge the US into a Greater Depression.

But avoid the worst case and one still faces significant difficulties. The combination of currency debasement, currency dumping and increased military tensions could heat up in the fall considerably.

What really is catching our attention is on how these events all seem to be coming to a head in September. Even Christine Lagarde has mentioned the exact date of September 15 of this year as a deadline… this is the exact date that we have mentioned in our viral video, “SHEMITAH EXPOSED: Financial Crisis Planned For September” as being the possible beginning date of a crisis. And then to have the Chinese President also coming to the US in September has us wondering if the crisis we are expecting will be China/Yuan/SDR related.

The Chinese have a saying, “may you live in interesting times” – and September looks increasingly interesting on a number of fronts.

GOOD GOD.. ITS ALMOST TOO LATE !!

An Illegal alien has a child on American soil, the Constitution does not require the child be granted American citizenship.

Are children of illegal aliens born on American soil U.S. citizens? The Constitution says no. 

Here is the actual language of the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” 

Birthright citizenship only belongs to those who were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States the moment they were born. But children of illegal aliens are not. 

Their parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States but rather of their home country, which is why they can be immediately deported if identified and apprehended. You can’t do that to an American citizen. 

Since the parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, neither are their children. They are, in plain fact, not citizens of the U.S. by birth. 

This is why the children of diplomats who are born on U.S. soil are not U.S. citizens. Since their parents are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, neither are the children. 

We are all familiar with the concept of “diplomatic immunity,” which diplomats often use to get themselves and their children out of trouble on American soil by claiming that the children are not under the authority of American law. All the American government can do in such circumstances is send them back to their home country. That is, all they can do is deport them. 

SO: 

If an illegal alien has a child on American soil, the Constitution does not require the child be granted American citizenship. 

Congress can give citizenship to anyone it wants, but the Fourteenth Amendment only commands citizenship to persons born on U.S. soil to parents who are not citizens of a foreign country... 

While many erroneously claim that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born on American soil, the reality is that is not the law and has never been the law. Current immigration law–found at 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)–specifies that a baby born on American soil to (1) a foreign ambassador, (2) head of state, or (3) foreign military prisoner is not an American citizen. 

But if the view promoted by the Left that citizenship is automatic (and parroted by many in the middle and even on the Right who have not seriously studied the issue) is correct, then those three exceptions would be unconstitutional. The debate over birthright citizenship turns on what the Citizenship Clause means by the words “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” 

Every provision of the Constitution has a fixed meaning. Because only “We the People” can adopt a constitutional provision–all 27 amendments in the Constitution were proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, then ratified by three-fourths of the states–the only legitimate way to interpret the Constitution is in accordance with the original meaning of those terms. 

So the question becomes: What was the meaning of the Jurisdiction Clause in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified? One of the best tools for determining that is looking at the Civil Rights Act of 1866, enacted the same year that the Fourteenth Amendment was written by Congress... 

The Civil Rights Act included a provision to define American citizenship to secure it for former slaves. It read, “All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States...”

  

[T]he Civil Rights Act’s parallel language, “and not subject to any foreign power,” instead shows the Jurisdiction Clause excludes all citizens of any foreign country. The Citizenship Clause was intended to overrule the most infamous Supreme Court case in American history–the 1857 Dred Scott case–and ensure free blacks born in America could not be denied citizenship. It was never designed to make a citizen of every child born to a foreigner. 

The way forward is simple. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives power to Congress to “enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” 

Donald Trump in 2016 will work with a conservative Congress, which has the sole authority under the Constitution to determine immigration policy, to enact a law specifying in no uncertain terms that children of illegal aliens born on American soil are not American citizens. 

Some well-meaning Republican candidates are calling for an amendment to the Constitution to ban birthright citizenship. But in truth the Constitution does NOT need to be amended. It only needs to be applied.

Bottom line: Are children of illegal aliens American citizens? No. Why? Because the Constitution says they aren’t.

ANY QUESTIONS?

George Sorros will Crown Hillary Clinton the Next President of AMERIKA. Mark my words.

America is being destroyed from Within:

George Sorros will Select Hillary Clinton as the next President of the DISUNITED STATES OF AMERIKA.

ONLY REVOLUTION WILL STOP THIS.  REVOLT AND SECEDE. WE CANNOT CO-EXIST!

Some might think this premature but unless Americans start reacting to the dangers of collectivism consuming our Republic, it is inevitable and it will be soon. We are racing to that finish line in no small part thanks to George Soros, his money and his connections. Soros is a Socialist who believes in a new world order. He sees the U.S. Republic as standing in the way of his globalist vision.

The United States is a lot less free than it was decades ago, even five years ago, and a globalist victory must of necessity end our sovereignty, our Bill of Rights and Constitution. They can’t co-exist in a collectivist society.
Putting an end to the Republic is the Soros goal. He is the cat and we are the mouse.
“I realized [as a young man] that it’s money that makes the world go round,” says Soros, “so I might as well make money.… But having made it, I could then indulge my social concerns.” Invariably, those concerns center around a desire to change the world generally—and America particularly—into something new, something consistent with his vision of “social justice.”
Soros’ social justice vision is identical to Karl Marx’ social justice except Soros believes in a small elite and privileged society of which he would be a member.
Soros founded The Open Society. The term “open society” was originally coined in 1932 by the French philosopher Henri Louis Bergson, to describe societies whose moral codes were founded upon “universal” principles seeking to enhance the welfare of all mankind—as opposed to “closed” societies that placed self-interest above any concern for other nations and cultures.
He does not believe in sovereignty or in absolutes such as God. He believes in all things being relative and morals that can shift according to the common good as defined by the collective.
Soros-funded initiatives aim at voting; open borders; forcing through progressive candidates and legislation’ disarming the US; abolishing the Second Amendment; corrupting Christianity; particularly the Catholic Church; forcing leftist values into the judicial system; universal health care; organizations that force leftist ideals into music, art, and all media; radical environmentalism; drug legalization; global government; radical feminism; euthanasia; and anti-Israel agreements with Palestine. I won’t go into all of them here. A few is quite enough.
Soros has a radical anti-gun agenda. He has teamed up with Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the Bloomberg initiative, which was recently outed as an organization whose goal is to confiscate guns. Over 50 mayors have quit because of it, according to Townhall.
According to Ammoland, the Soros organization, the National League of Cities, is actively pushing extreme anti-gun measures:

• Registration of all handguns
• Banning semi-automatic firearms
• Cracking down on gun shows
• A thirty-day waiting period on all gun purchases
• Ending the manufacture of magazines holding more than 10-rounds
• Turning parks, libraries and other public places into so-called “gun free” zones.

These measures would only be the beginning. Confiscation is Soros’ end goal. The National League of Cities is made up of 49 affiliated state Municipal Leagues, who are ACTIVELY working in state legislatures and city councils nationwide.
Anyone who has looked into the UN Small Arms Treaty knows confiscation is the goal of the left.
Soros is a philanthropist who has used his charities to inculcate recipients of his largesse with indoctrination. Take the Catholics and other religious groups.
They are an easy mark because they believe in social justice. However, social justice in religion and in politics are not necessarily the same. He funds the Sojourners which makes wealth redistribution into a biblical mandate. There is the Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good which brands individualism and capitalism as evil. Catholics for Choice is pushing for full abortion rights. If Soros can defeat pro-lifers, he can completely corrupt the church and its 100 million followers in the U.S.
Soros also funds organizations like the  Progressive States Network which aggressively seeks to pass Progressive legislation in the States; and his Progressive Change Committee which campaigns for the most Progressive candidates. Indeed, the leftists have most of the cities under their control.
George Soros, the socialist billionaire who helps fund the Center for American Progress, has the ear of the president on every issue.
Soros has a dream for the world and in order to make it work, he must defeat the Republic and turn the United States into a democracy, which is a euphemism for socialism. His Open Society is a social justice, economic justice, environmental justice, pro-abortion, pro-population control, UN-friendly, Marxist society.
The Center of American Progress’s president, John Podesta, is now working with the Administration at the White House to push through Obama’s decidedly leftist agenda by circumventing Congress.
The Center for American Progress, an arm of George Soros, laid out the blueprint for the use of executive orders, rule making, agencies et al, to circumvent Congress in the organization’s definitive report, “The Power of the President, Recommendations to Advance Progressive Change.”
To quote Mr. Podesta, ‘The ability of President Obama to accomplish important change through these powers should not be underestimated.’
Using obfuscating language, the essay encourages the President to use the powers they think he has to ignore Congress and the confines of the Constitution. It outlines a plan for an extremely powerful Executive Branch.
They advise the President to use his “constitutional powers:”

• Executive orders
• Rulemaking
• Agency management
• Convening and creating public-private partnerships [crony socialism]
• Commanding the armed forces [sequestration?]
• Diplomacy [lying?]

On the issue of open borders, which is what amnesty condones, almost all the groups opposing any restrictions on immigration reform are funded by Soros. This past week several groups promised to “punish” Republicans who do not support immigration reform with a path to citizenship now. The groups such as the  The Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM), America’s Voice, and Center for Community Change are all Soros-funded groups.
We can’t allow a shadow culture to continue in our society and something must be done but Soros hopes to make ill use of the opportunity.
The immigration fight has successfully been turned into racism against Hispanics when in fact, forty percent of the people sneaking into the U.S. are from countries other than Mexico, Central and South America. The propaganda has worked and it is why Soros funds untold numbers of far-left groups.
His Migration Policy Institute seeks to create “a North America with gradually disappearing border controls … with permanent migration remaining at moderate levels.”
The issue for Soros isn’t just about helping illegal immigrants, it’s about erasing our borders and our sovereignty. It’s about legalizing tens of millions of Democrats because people from statist nations vote for statists which is what the Democratic Party is becoming with little pushback from moderates.
If you really have doubts, look at the symbols they use. Here is one in which they use the communist fist:

Catalist Seeks is a Soros organization building a Progressive voter database. Mr. Obama is using Obama for America in the same way.
The Brennan Center for Justice which is Soros-funded, aims to restore voting rights to felons immediately following conviction because felons overwhelmingly vote for Democrats according to polls. Everyone is falling in line and buying into the idea that it will be part of their rehabilitation. This is in no small part due to the media.
When the Brennan Center for Justice, part of NYU’s Law School, came out against voting law changes, including voter ID as racist and anti-poor, based on a study before the 2012 election, The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and CBS News failed to note that the study was funded by George Soros. They do make a point of the Koch Brothers funding Libertarian or Conservative causes.
The price tag for the study came to over $10 million, according to Newsbusters.
As reported by Discover the Networks, Soros has a strong hand in the media.
The Media Research Center, in 2011, found that he spent $48 million in funds for: NBC, ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Columbia Journalism Review, ProPublica, the Center for Public Integrity, the Center for Investigative Reporting, The Lens, the Columbia School of Journalism, the National Federation of Community Broadcasters, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists, the Organization of News Ombudsmen, National Public Radio, the Pacifica Foundation, The American Prospect Inc. (the owner and publisher of The American Prospect magazine), the Nation Institute, the Media Fund, the Independent Media Center, the Independent Media Institute, Media Matters For America, and Free Press.
He funds “nonpartisan” watchdog organizations such as the Kansas City Chapter of The League of Women Voters.
Soros’ Open Society Institute and the Tides Foundation fund hundreds of groups devoted to pushing America to the left, including extreme environmentalists and avowed communists.
Soros has cultivated black communities and sold his Marxist philosophy to them. Some Soros groups have focused their efforts on spreading the belief that white racism is undiminished and intractable.
He funds the NAACP which should be renamed the NAAFLCP, the National Association for the Advancement of Far-Left Colored People.
When Lt. Col. Allen West said 80 House Democrats “are members of the Communist Party, it’s called the Congressional Progressive Caucus”, the NAACP ousted him. If he had said the Tea Party was racist they would have given him an award.
West’s statement was correct but he wasn’t armed with the proof at the time.
Soros’ Legal Defense and Education Fund provides legal and educational services for the NAACP. The NAACP supports racial preferences in employment and education, as well as the racial gerrymandering of voting districts. Underpinning its support for race preferences is the fervent belief that white racism in the United States remains an intractable, largely undiminished, phenomenon.
Soros funds organizations that help corrupt the vote.
He recently gave $1 million to the NAACP to fight voter ID laws. The NAACP recently held a march and, ironically, no one could join without a photo ID.

In 2012 Soros gave the Advancement Project, an organization funded by the convicted felon George Soros, sued Wisconsin over the new state Voter ID law. This is something he has done repeatedly.
Project Vote is funded by him and it is the voter mobilization arm of the infamous ACORN, and, yes, ACORN does still exist.
Project Vote, another Soros group, is the voter-mobilization arm of the Soros-funded ACORN. A persistent pattern of lawlessness and corruption has followed ACORN/Project Vote activities over the years. While the IRS is targeting Catherine Englebrecht of True the Vote, an organization that tries to keep the vote honest, Project Vote operates freely in the shadows of numerous minority communities.
George Soros is funding his son Jonathan’s efforts to destroy the Electoral College with an initiative that would bypass Congress called the National Popular Vote (NPV) or the National Popular Vote Compact (NPVC). They are close to having the number of states needed to pass it. It would ensure a permanent Democratic President and Vice President and it would enshrine voter corruption.
It is very complex. The article on this link helps explain the NPV. The corrupt scheme will give the power of the election to as few as 11 states in some instances. The big cities, which are liberal, will decide the election. When the Framers devised the college, it was for the express purpose of giving less-populated states a say in the presidential election. NPVC would destroy that.
It has bipartisan support in what can only be described as foolish or betrayal. Check out this interview on the subject.
Soros shows up everywhere, at CPAC, the Conservative Union PAC, as a funder of an anti-Israel Evangelical group, and even as a supporter of the 9/11 Truthers which he uses to push for his type of election reform.
When you see extremism and moral corruption in our society, look for George Soros and do consider this, the Republic cannot survive alongside a collective state as he has envisioned.

Who is the REAL "TROJAN HORSE" HUSSEIN OBAMA? ANOTHER THEORY WORTH READING ABOUT

The REAL Obama: Is he an An INDONESIAN, Muslim, Socialist Puppet The National Patriot ^By Craig Andresen

 

Over the last several days, conservatives across social media have been circulating an image, a split screen cut and paste of Obama and Mohammed (Pak) Subud along with a link to a very well thought out piece from Jason Kissner at American Thinker.

That piece brings several…”Coincidences” to light.

When it comes to politics and Obama’s past, there are no such things as “coincidences.”

Kissner shows links between Obama’s “mother” Stanley Ann Dunham to a certain Subud spiritual cult and also documents the verifiable link between the Subud cult and one Loretta Fuddy.

Fuddy, you will remember, was the woman who had been appointed in January, 2011, to head the agency in Hawaii that “verified” Obama’s birth certificate…The one he finally, after years of questions, displayed to the world in March of 2011.

Fuddy also was the lone non-survivor of a small plane crash off the coast of Hawaii just a couple of months ago.

No coincidences…Remember?

The idea being promoted is that this Mohammad Subud, the founder of the Subud cult, is Obama’s real father but, before we get to that, there IS something regarding that split-screen image you should know.

It is a composite.

According to Adrien Nash who wrote an article yesterday, “I copied and reversed Subud’s eye and replaced Obama’s which was squinting.”

A composite/split-screen that makes the 2 look more like each other than they otherwise might is not only the wrong way to highlight the visual similarities but, it is completely unnecessary.

The speculation is and, let’s remember, when it comes to Obama’s past we MUST speculate as his official past has been completely buried, that this Subud fathered the man we know as Barack Hussein Obama.

For the speculation to be true, one must assume that in 1960, Subud and Stanley Ann Dunham met, somewhere, and he, got her, pregnant thus leading to a child who would, after several name changes…Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Obama, Steven Dunham , Barry Soetoro and the name first noticed back in 2011 regarding an application for a passport extension filed by Stanley Ann Soetoro in 1968.

THAT name was found in the section for either including or exempting a child’s name from the passport and the name she placed THERE before crossing it out was, Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah)

Soebarkah, is has been suggested, is a combination name Soe (from Soetoro, Obama’s “adoptive” father) Bar (from the Islamic Aramic meaning, SON) and Kah (which roughly translates from Indonesian as “was” or, in some cases, in names is used to denote a QUESTION regarding “WHO?”)

It has also been suggested “Soebarkah” was a name provided by the Subud cult as Loretta Fuddy went by the Subud name of “Deliana” Fuddy.

Either way, it does nothing to either verify or debunk Pak Subud as being Obama’s real father.

What I am about to propose is speculation and, at first glance, seems pretty far out there but, upon consideration, may well be plausible.

There is a theory that Dunham traveled to Kenya in 1961 and it has been said that the reason for that trip was to give birth to her child and leave that child with the Obama family.

Then there is the theory that Dunham gave birth in Hawaii.

Which is true? Simply, there is no verifiable evidence for either theory but…The Kenyan birth would answer those swirling questions regarding those IN Kenya, including his grandmother, who claim to have been there FOR the birth and the claims of Kenyan officials who say that Obama was born in Kenya.

Those in the Dunham family who wanted an AMERICAN son could have simply written the announcement that appeared in the Hawaiian newspaper as there was never any verification or proof of birth needed to run such an announcement whether or not he was born THERE and simply returned FROM Kenya with Dunham-Obama.

Could she have returned to Hawaii with the son because the Kenyan Obama clan refused to take him?

In 1965 or so…Stanley Ann Dunham then traveled to Indonesia…With her son, where she was hired to start an English language, business communications department and, where SHE recruited and hired several teachers who were MEMBERS OF SUBUD.

No Coincidences…Remember?

Consider this scenario…

At some point before traveling to Indonesia, she met and was impregnated BY…Subud…NOT by Obama Sr. which would explain why Obama Sr. was never a part of Obama JR.’s life.

Could Subud had fathered a child (Soebarkah) by someone other than his wife?

Subud, before his “spiritual epiphany” was a Muslim and we are all aware of the monogamous fidelity of that ideology not to mention the dubious history of such strength of character in cult leaders…Especially in those who feel kinship with the Almighty.

What to do?

Since the teenage Dunham was sexually promiscuous anyway…Simply claim the child wasn’t HIS and she would then assume it belonged to someone ELSE…In this case…Obama Sr.

However, several years later, Dunham-Obama would have had to notice that her son looked nothing like the man she THOUGHT was the father and, the OTHER man she knew she had been with at the same time was…Subud…Living in Indonesia.

Is there any better explanation for why this young woman, with no ties to that country, would go to live there?

That would also explain how Barack Hussein Obama, adopted IN Indonesia by the INDONESIAN LOLO SOETORO, was able to attend school IN Indonesia as his records indicated, with Indonesian citizenship.

He was Indonesian all along.

It would also account for the attempted name inclusion on the passport extension application with Soebarkah, in parentheses, then crossed out.

Such a theory, speculative, as we must speculate where no verifiable evidence is available, also would go a long ways toward covering the whole fraudulent birth certificate issue as a child, born in Kenya, would not HAVE a Hawaiian birth certificate and who better to “authenticate” the forged certificate that Loretta…”DELIANA” Fuddy…A woman who WAS the CHAIRWOMAN OF SUBUD USA FROM 2006 UNTIL 2008 IN SEATTLE???

A woman who may…MAY…Have known the TRUTH regarding the “son” of Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro.

Was the Obama we know today…REALLY FATHERED BY AN INDONESIAN, FORMER MUSLIM AND FOUNDER OF A SPIRITUAL CULT??

QUITE POSSIBLY BORN IN KENYA…TO A MOTHER TOO YOUNG TO LEGALLY TRANSFER U.S. CITIZENSHIP???

WHO ATTENDED SCHOOL IN INDONESIA AS AN INDONESIAN CITIZEN WITH NO RECORD OF EVER BECOMING A UNITED STATES CITIZEN????

Well…That is exactly what those who took Obama from a Community Organizer to the white house clearly wouldn’t want known.

Isn’t it?

By spending millions of dollars, a mere pittance to the people who buried his past, they found a man who held no underlying allegiance to the United States and a man whose ideology was the same as their own.

In order to “fundamentally transform” the United States…They needed a SOCIALIST…NOT an AMERICAN who would become their willing puppet, doing what he was told, reading from their teleprompter text, a Muslim who would befriend our enemies while turning his back on our allies.

And Obama himself must have known all along as all the records pertaining to his past would not have been buried without his knowledge.

Who paid for his pricey Ivy League education? Saudis with no connection to him or the wealthy Indonesian leader of a spiritual movement who DIDN’T want to be connected to him, as hush payments?

Obama has never been conflicted because he was half WHITE…He, as a young man, was conflicted because he WASN’T half BLACK as, being BLACK in America during those college years would clearly have afforded Obama some entitlements.

And while, in this day and age, it can never be said for certain that pictures don’t lie but…They have and always will say 1000 words.

Now you tell me…Who is more likely to be the father of the current occupant of the oval office…

Barack Obama SR?

Or…

Mohammed (Pak) Subud???

Hey…Barack Hussein Obama…Barack Obama…Barry Obama…Steven Dunham…Barry Soetoro…Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah)…

Black Lives matter only if there is a Buck in it for the Progressives. Read and share how black babies are just "Matter"

inShare1

The Negro Project was initiated in 1939 by Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. It was a collaborative effort between the American Birth Control League and Sanger’s Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau.¹ For a eugenist, it wasn’t controversial, it was integral to the implementation of eugenics to eliminate the ‘unfit’. Eugenics is “a science that deals with the improvement (as by control of human mating) of hereditary qualities of a race or breed”.² Negative eugenics focused on preventing the birth of those it considered inferior or unfit. This was the foundation of Sanger’s Birth Control Policy and advocated throughout her writings, speeches, and her periodicals including “Pivot of Civilization”, “Plan for Peace” and countless Birth Control Review articles. The pseudo-science (racial hygiene theory) of negative eugenics influenced social policy and eugenics-based legislation (Immigration Act of 1924³, segregation laws, sterilization laws) and led to the racial hygiene theory adopted by the Nazis. Noted eugenist, Eugen Fischer, who was funded by The Rockefeller Foundation (one of many same organizations that also financially supported Sanger’s work), was responsible for the Nazi adoption of racial hygiene theory at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute that led to the eugenics implementation of the holocaust.⁴ The connection between American Eugenics and the horrors of Nazi Germany are irrefutable. The preponderance of evidence of where Sanger wanted to go (although she decried the atrocities of the holocaust after WWII) shows the ignorance and naivete of eugenics philosophy and its eventual conclusion, left undeterred.  The Negro Project was but a precursor to what eugenists wanted to implement on a much larger scale.

“…those of us who believe that the benefits of Planned Parenthood as a vital key to the elimination of human waste must reach the entire population, also believe that a double effort must be made to extend this program as a public health measure to Negroes who need is proportionately greater.”

– Dr. Dorothy Ferebee (black physician serving as the Chairman of the Family Planning Committee of the National Council of Negro Women) at 1942 annual Planned Parenthood meeting. (One should note that, today, both Planned Parenthood and the National Council of Negro Women are radically pro-abortion.)

MAAFA21 is a powerful documentary that exposes the eugenic racism of Planned Parenthood. Watch it, free, online at www.Maafa21.com

MORE INFO AT http://www.blackgenocide.org/negro.html

This is the same Sanger who persuaded a few reluctant, yet incredibly influential, black ministers to join in her Birth Control movement. To dispel the rising doubts among those who objected to Birth Control on religious and moral grounds, Sanger wrote that “the ministers work is also important…offering to train him in their ideals because “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members”.⁶ Many use this statement to bolster the claim that Sanger wanted to exterminate all of the black population, but this statement is about reducing a certain type of black individual that Sanger believed should be eliminated, sterilized, or segregated onto farms.⁷ Those who were poor and (supposedly) less intelligent. Eugenists believed the entirety of the black population were intellectually and racially inferior. (Sanger’s ideological agreement and written/spoken solidarity with the eugenics movements does throw legitimate doubt on whether it was only a segment of the black population that was being targeted.) With the help of elite and famous African-Americans Mary McLeod Bethune, W.E.B. DuBois, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, Sr., the Negro Project was able to be sold as a solution to poverty and high birth rates. It is crucial, however, to understand this endeavor in conjunction with Sanger’s dominant efforts of ‘eliminating the unfit’ and her hatred of charitable organizations.  She devotes an entire chapter on charities and how those who finance them “are dropping millions into rosewater philanthropies and charities that are silly at best and vicious at worst.”⁸

“Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease…Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks [of people] that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.”

– Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, Chapter V, “Cruelty of Charity”

Abortion is today’s Birth Control.

Here is the simple truth.  The intent of Sanger’s Negro Project is firmly intact. Nearly 40% of all African-American pregnancies end in induced abortion.⁹ There is more access to birth control than ever before and the huge disparity in poverty rates between whites and blacks continues. Fatherlessness and poverty are rampant. Unintended pregnancy rates in the black community continue to rise. Today, the same mouthpieces for Planned Parenthood are claiming “lack of access” while black women access abortion clinics at 5 times the rate of white women. This is by design. Abortion kills more black lives (363,705)¹⁰ than all other causes of death combined (285,522).¹¹ In NYC, home of Planned Parenthood, more black babies are aborted than born alive! Abortion, no matter the race, is a tragedy. But in the black community, it is epidemic. Mainstream media, black celebrities, health care professionals and so-called black leaders continue to shill for Planned Parenthood, while our churches (who stood against injustice during the Civil Rights Movement) are mostly silent. Regardless, the truth screams loud and clear. Under the false liberty of ‘reproductive freedom’ we are killing our very future.

Footnotes

¹http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/bc_or_race_control.html

²http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eugenics

³http://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/ImmigrationAct

⁴http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/deadlymedicine/profiles/

⁵“Planned Parenthood as a Public Health Measure for the Negro Race”, Speech by Dr. Dorothy Ferebee, January 29th, 1942

⁶http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/bc_or_race_control.html

⁷“Plan for Peace” by Margaret Sanger, Birth Control Review, April 1932

⁸“Pivot of Civilization” by Margaret Sanger, pg 264

⁹2008 Abortion Surveillance Report, CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6015a1.htm

¹⁰2008 Abortion Stats, National Reproductive Health Profile, Guttmacher.org. Download PDF here.

¹¹http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_10.pdf

Obama was Illegally selected as President without Following the Constitution. Read and Share. Its time for revolution

The “objections” and “call for objections” required by our Constitution and 3 U.S.C. § 15 have not been made. Therefore Obama has never been determined in accordance with the “electoral and Congressional processes” to be a “qualified” President elect and is not the President of the United States.

These two men, the “members” of Congress, “judges and justices” in our courts, and other enemies are conspiring and levying war against the People of the United States.

“Chief Justice” John Roberts did not have any authority to administer oaths to Obama nor did Obama have the right to take the oaths. Why? Because the “objections” and the “call for objections” that are procedurally required in our Constitution and in 3 U.S.C. § 15 have never been  made.

The required “objections” and “call for objections” are not technicalities, but procedural safeguards provided to protect the United States from foreign enemies — more specifically from enemy infiltration. But these highest and foremost safeguards for our Republic have been entirely disregarded by all the “members” of Congress, all the “judges” and “justices” in our courts, and all the other so-called “public officers.” Apparently, they are not only acting in a seditious conspiracy against the Government of the United States, but aiding and comforting foreign enemies of the United States, and overtly assembling an unconstitutional army—levying war against the United States.

NOTE: We the People of the United States in fact do not have representation in Congress, do not have a president, and do not have honorable judges and justices in our courts. Instead, they have in fact been acting in a conspiracy of silence—all of them violating their oath of office—conspiring against We the People of the United States in back room deals to remain silent about their usurpation of the Office of President while committing other treasonous crimes.

NOTE: Obama was not elected, but hand picked by enemies of the United States, including oath-breakers who are masquerading in our Government and courts.

3 U.S.C. 15 states in part as follows:                                                                   “Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.”

The word “shall” in 3 U.S.C. 15 (above) means that it is mandatory that the President of the Senate “call for objections.” This law does not permit the President of the Senate to decide not to do so: There is no discretionary decision to be made — the President of the Senate must do as the law requires, i.e., as the People of the United States require. The words “if any” do not imply that the President of the Senate should or would know in advance of the count that “objections” are going to be registered. The word “shall” with “if any” mean that he must call out loudly, “Are there any objections?”

Not only is he trespassing — he’s a spy that has infiltrated and degraded all of our national defenses—levying war against the United States.

NOTE: Obama and his co-conspirators have apparently obtained an unlawful residency at the White House, but have never acquired the “Office of President,” because he did not have the right to take the “Oath” for the “Office”. Obama can never acquire the status of “President” and in fact all of the “laws,” “executive orders” and “appointments” he has signed are void ab initio.

When John McCain was sued in federal court for his ineligibility (he was born in the Coco Soto “family hospital” outside the jurisdiction of the United States), Obama and Hillary Clinton co-sponsored Senate Resolution 511 to persuade United States District Judge William Alsup to dismiss the lawsuit and motion for a preliminary injunction alleging that McCain was not a “natural born Citizen” and must therefore be struck from the ballot in the 2008 election. Obama, Clinton and other senators presented Senate Resolution 511 to the Senate Judiciary Committee and it was then unanimously agreed to on April 30, 2008. (See Senate Resolution 511) The full text of Resolution 511 is also seen below.

A person MUST BE born in the United States to “American citizens” (plural) to be a “natural born Citizen” under the provision of Article II, Section 1 of our Constitution.

NOTE: The text of Senate Resolution 511 specifically includes the “Whereas” stating that John McC’ain “was born to American citizens” (plural).

This is an illegitimate “presidency” and “vice presidency.”

Judge Alsup did not make a decision during most of the 2008 campaign and then he dismissed the case, including its motion for preliminary injunction, just prior to the election. In the first paragraph of his order to dismiss Alsup stated that “John McCain’s parents were both United States citizens” (plural). Alsup then in the conclusion of his order to dismiss the motion for a preliminary injunction, wrote, “It is highly probable, for the purposes of this motion for provisional relief, that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen.” See Judge Alsup’s order.

NOTE: Having dismissed the case, Judge Alsup in fact did not make a decision as to whether or not McCain was a “natural born Citizen,” but only wrote that it is “highly probable” that he is one and based his statement only on the fact that McCain was born to “United States citizens” (plural), not on the fact that McCain was born outside the jurisdiction of the United States.

Both Senate Resolution 511 and Judge Alsup’s order to dismiss specifically acknowledge that John McCain “was born to American citizens” (plural). Every member of Congress, including Obama, judge and justice in the United States knows that a person must be “born to American citizens” (plural) to be a “natural born Citizen”. Senate Resolution 511 states as follows:

“Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens [plural] of the United States … Now, therefore, be it Resolved that John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘natural born Citizen‘ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”

Judge Alsup and all the senators who sponsored and agreed to Senate Resolution 511 know that the two requirements in the term “natural born Citizen” are:

1) A person must have been born in the United States, and

2) His/her parents must have been United States citizens (plural).

NOTE: Judge Alsup’s acknowledgment that “John McCain’s parents were both United States citizens” (plural) and his subsequent statement that “It is highly probable, for the purposes of this motion for provisional relief, that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen,” is the FORMAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT of a United States federal court that a person, to be eligible to assume the Office of President, must have been born to “United States citizens” (plural).

It is in the meaning of “natural born Citizen” that a person, in order to be eligible to be the President of the United States, must be 100% under the jurisdiction of the United States, i.e., not only born on United States soil, but also born to two “citizens of the United States” (plural), i.e., not owing allegiance to anyone else.

NOTE: The word “allegiance” (according to its etymology) is fealty owed to one and only one sovereign exclusively. A child born to a foreign father owes allegiance elsewhere. Obama in fact has no allegiance to the United States.

These two men and their numerous other co-conspirators are conspiring against the United States Constitution.

Judge William Alsup also, as grounds for his decision in 2008 to dismiss the case alleging that John McCain’s is not a natural born Citizen and the motion for a preliminary injunction to strike McCain from the ballot in the 2008 election, stated in his order to dismiss that the time and actions to challenge a person who is not a “natural born Citizen” is to bring the arguments regarding his or her lack of qualifications “to the voting public before the election” and in “objections” to be registered after the electoral votes are counted, as specified in the electoral procedure provided in 3 U.S.C 15. Judge Alsup stated, “the statute provides a mechanism for objections to be registered and resolved,” and he also quoted from the statute and the Twentieth Amendment of our Constitution:

“[e]very objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made … shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision: and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision.”

ibid. The Twentieth Amendment further provides:

“… if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified, and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be elected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”

Judge Alsup continues in his order as follows:

“It is clear that mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are counted and that the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify. Issues regarding qualifications for president are quintessentially suited to the foregoing process. Arguments concerning qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in Congress. The members of the Senate and the House of Representatives are well qualified to adjudicate any objections to ballots for allegedly unqualified candidates. Therefore, this order holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the first instance. Judicial review — if any — should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course. Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300–02 (1998).”

Judge Alsup makes a specific point of stating above that the “The members of the Senate and the House of Representatives are well qualified to adjudicate any objections to ballots for allegedly unqualified candidates.” In other words, he very clearly (specifically) stated that the members of the Senate and the House of Representatives know all of the eligibility requirements of the United States Constitution and are required by the People of the United States to apply them. Judge Alsup stated that “judicial review — if any — should occur only “after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.”

NOTE: Although Judge Alsup’s decision to dismiss the case and motion for a preliminary injunction were in a case regarding McCain, he carefully outlined the processes that are required by law to take place in determining whether a candidate can be a “qualified” President elect, and the fact is that neither of the processes stated in Judge Alsup’s order to dismiss took place. The voting public was not informed during the campaigns in 2008 and 2012 of the fact that Obama was ineligible to assume the Office of President. Dick Cheney, the President of the Senate, never made the “call for objections” required by 3 U.S.C. 15 and the members of Congress, although they all knew that Obama was ineligible to assume the Office of President, did not make the required “objections”. These procedural processes carefully established in the law as safeguards against enemy infiltration and specifically cited within Judge Alsup’s order, were in fact willfully violated by all of the “candidates and members of Congress.”

We no longer have three branches of government to check and balance powers: They have all united under Obama and are in fact levying war against the United States.

The People of the United States do not need a court/judge to see that Obama did not take the required (provided) qualification test, (i.e., that his ineligibility was not exposed during the campaign, that the required “call for objections” was not made and that all the “members of Congress,” although they knew well that he was ineligible did not make “objections”), and that the clear and only conclusion is that Obama did not and does not qualify as the President elect.

NOTE: No doubt McCain and all of the senators who sponsored and passed Senate Resolution 511, including Obama and Clinton, read Judge Alsup’s order. What is really very interesting is that Judge Alsup stated in his order that “arguments concerning qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election,” but Clinton, McCain and numerous others who, under their oaths of office had the responsibility to do so, did not bring up Obama’s lack of qualifications. McCain in fact conspired with Obama and others not to bring up the subject of the lack of qualifications, because McCain is also not a natural born Citizen. Neither did Romney bring up Obama’s ineligibility. And Clinton was ordered by the Democrat Party to keep her mouth shut.  They all conspired against “the voting public” and people of the United States before and after the election in 2008. And not only for the 2008 election, but also before and after the 2012 election.

NOW FOR TWO BIG QUESTIONS

1. Was Dick Cheney, the President of the Senate and presiding officer after the count of the electoral votes required by law to make the “call for objections”? 

The answer is YES, ABSOLUTELY !!!

3 U.S.C. 15 states in part as follows:

“Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.”

The word “shall” in 3 U.S.C. 15 (above) means that it is mandatory that the President of the Senate “call for objections.” This law does not permit the President of the Senate to decide not to do so. There is no discretionary decision to be made: The President of the Senate must do as the law requires, i.e., as the People of the United States require in their law. The words “if any” do not imply that the President of the Senate should or would know in advance of the count that “objections” are going to be registered. The word “shall” with “if any” simply mean that he must call out loudly, “Are there any objections?”

NOTE: As I have stated above, Dick Cheney, did not “call for objections,” and there is nothing in the law above requiring members of Congress to notify him prior to the count of the electoral votes that they have an “objection” to register. The “call for objections” is not conditioned on whether the President of the Senate  knows if there are going to be “objections”. If it was conditioned on the President of the Senate’s knowledge that there would be “objections,” then the the word “will” would be in the place of the word “shall”: The word “will” with “if” is conditional. The word “shall” with “if” is not.

This requirement for the President of the Senate to “call for objections” stems from our Constitution, which in the last sentence of the 12th Amendment says, “But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.” This last sentence of the 12th Amendment makes it clear that both the President elect and Vice President elect must qualify to assume the Office of President.

2. Were the members of Congress required by the Twelfth and Twentieth Amendments and 3 U.S.C. 15 to present “objections” regarding Obama’s lack of qualifications to Dick Cheney after the count of the electoral votes?

The answer is YES, ABSOLUTELY !!!

Obama, Biden and all the other members of Congress in 2008 and 2012 willfully violated procedural safeguards stemming from the United States Constitution, specified in 3 U.S.C. 15 and additionally outlined by a federal court. And these procedural safeguards are specifically to protect the United States from foreign enemies infiltrating our highest office and national defenses. The members of Congress MUST BE held accountable to the United States Constitution (the will  of the people), otherwise they are not representatives of the people. All the members of Congress knew or should have know (from Obama’s books) that Obama’s father was never an American citizen, and that Obama was, therefore, ineligible to assume the Office of President.  We are talking about lawyers in Congress (experts who were trusted by the people). Many of them had read Senate Resolution 511 and they passed it knowing the meaning of the term “natural born Citizen”. For the few ignorant members of Congress there is no excuse. It is in fact their job to know the meaning of “natural born Citizen”.

United States Constitution

The senators who sponsored and agreed to Senate Resolution 511 falsely imply in the resolution that the meaning of “natural born Citizen” in Article II, Section 1 clause 5 cannot be understood, and that the First Congress therefore defined “natural born Citizen” in 1790. Their claims are utterly false.

Article II, Section I clause 5 United States Constitution

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;…”

First, the term “natural born Citizen” appears in Article II, Section I clause 5 alongside the term “citizens”: These two terms are obviously not the same. The term “citizens” cannot be interchanged with the term “natural born Citizen” and because “citizens” is within the exception that was made at the time of the adoption of our Constitution, it is very easy to understand what the meaning of the term “natural born Citizen” is.

Second, Congress does not have authority to redefine “natural born Citizen,” and in fact the First Congress did not redefine it. It is in fact not possible to redefine a Natural God Given Right. The First Congress did not state in 1790 that children of citizens [plural] of the United States born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States were “natural born Citizens.” What the First Congress stated is that “children of citizens (plural) born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as, [i.e., accounted as or deemed as], natural-born citizens,” not that they are “natural born Citizens.”

The Naturalization Act of 1790 states that “children of citizens [plural] of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens.”

NOTE: The members of Congress are not permitted to change the meaning of “natural born Citizen” as it stands in our Constitution. They know the meaning of the term and that they are not permitted to define or redefine the term, and yet there were many attempts by members of Congress in the years leading up to the 2008 election to change the meaning (redefine) “natural born Citizen”. And their attempts reveal that they know that a “natural born Citizen” is a person born within the United States of citizen parents (plural).

NOTE: There are also articles now published on the internet which claim that Judge William Alsup decided that McCain was a “natural born Citizen.” One such article is on About.com U.S. Politics written by Tom Murse. It is not the truth. Judge Alsup in fact did not decide that McCain was a “natural born Citizen.” This can be seen in his order to dismiss the case.

NOTE: Nowhere in Judge Alsup’s order did he decide that the Congress has the role to define the term “natural born Citizen.” Alsup stated Congress has “the role of defining citizenship, including citizenship by reason of birth,” but he did not decide that Congress has the role of defining “natural born Citizen”. He in fact clarified that “the Fourteenth Amendment set a floor on citizenship, but to not define “natural born Citizen”), and provided that all born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, were citizens.” Judge Alsup also did not determine that those who had acquired “citizenship” under the Fourteenth Amendment were “natural born Citizens.” John Bingham (the author of the 14th Amendment) wrote as follows:

“All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens.”

CONCLUSION:

These are willful violations of procedural law which have no place in our Republic and in fact these violations denied The People of the United States representation — these required “processes” did not took place. First of all, numerous members of Congress, including Barack Obama, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Mick Romney obviously knew full and well the meaning of the term “natural born Citizen, but as Judge Alsup states, did not inform the voting public of Obama’s ineligibility “before the election.” Neither did Dick Cheney “call for objections” after the counting of the electoral votes. And these violations of law in fact immediately disqualified Obama as the “President elect” and render his claimed “presidency” void ab initio. He is not “the President.” In fact Obama cannot be lawfully impeached: Only a president can be impeached.

As Judge Alsup has stated in his order to dismiss, a “call for objections” must be made and the objections “registered”. And after the objections are registered the objections must be “resolved” by both the Senate and House of Representatives. ‘This is the law, not because Judge Alsup says so, but because our Constitution and 2 U.S.C. 15 say so. Until the required objections to Obama’s ineligibility are “registered” and “resolved,” the People of the United States are willfully denied lawful representation, denied a president and denied the protection of the laws under three branches of government. In fact today, the courts are making the law, Obama is violating the law and Congress is conspiring with them.


ITS TIME FOR REVOLUTION.

THE WHOLE SYSTEM HAS BEEN CO-OPTED