Tuesday, May 20, 2014

OBAMACARE.. OBAMA LIAR... OBAMA CHEAT OBAMA FRAUD

The full scale of the ObamaCare launch disaster is revealed

Remember back in the old days, when we had an inquisitive media filled with “reporters” who would do whatever it took to get the real facts of a story, especially if they thought powerful officials might be lying to the American people? We’ll probably get such an environment back, if a Republican becomes President in 2016. But ever since Barack Obama was elected, the media has served more as a volunteer ignorance militia, blindly disseminating whatever talking points the Administration gives them with very little challenge. When vital information is withheld from the American people, Obama’s palace-guard media shrugs and says, “Hey, what are you gonna do?”
Well, one thing you can do is file Freedom of Information Act requests, and if the Obama Administration illegally refuses to respond, you can file FOIA lawsuits. Only independent watchdog groups do that sort of digging now. The “mainstream media” stirs in its easy chairs, roused from fond nappy-time dreams of how much fun they had at the second Obama inaugural, and harrumphs in confusion as each new nugget of long-buried truth is excavated by these outsiders. It’s nothing short of astonishing that none of the big FOIA bombshells are coming from our huge, well-staffed, highly funded media organizations. And they’re not exactly eager to pump the headlines full of astonishing truth, even when someone else drops it into their laps.

Judicial Watch, which did investigative work the mainstream media willfully refused to do on the Benghazi and IRS scandals, just emerged from the Obama Temple of Doom with yet another long-lost treasure of hard information: a 106-page document from the Department of Health and Human Services, revealing the breathtaking scope of the ObamaCare launch disaster. In accordance with standard Obama scandal protocols, all of this information was kept from the public until a few crucial news cycles had rolled past.

Let us note, as too much reporting on these latter-day revelations fails to do, that this HHS document was procured with a lawsuit, not a Freedom of Information Act “request.” Judicial Watch made such a request in October 2013, but the Obama Administration illegally refused to comply, prompting the watchdog group to follow up with court action in late November.
The people who call themselves “reporters” will probably relegate this new document to Page A-26 and claim it’s all “old news.” The important thing to remember is that they refused to report it, or even push hard for the information, back when it was piping-hot news, and might have caused public anger to grow incandescently hot. Obama’s political team understands that every scandal grows less damaging over time, if you have a friendly media that doesn’t make a big deal about the outrageous stonewalling necessary to drag out damaging revelations.
One of the amazing facts in this HHS document was already revealed long after it would have provoked a firestorm of national outrage: only one ObamaCare enrollment was received on the first day of history’s most expensive website launch. But the other details unearthed by Judicial Watch paint a portrait of staggering incompetence and mendacity:

On October 1, there were 43,208 accounts created and 1 enrollment. (Page 49)

As of October 31, 2013, there were 1,319,425 accounts created nationwide – but only 30,512 actual enrollments in Obamacare. (Page 19)

On October 1, 2013, at the end of the first day (4:30), the Senior Advisor at Center forConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Brigid M. Russell, sent out an email to her staff with a subject line celebrating “2 enrollments!” The body copy of the email read: “We have our second official FFM enrollment! The first two Form 834s sent out are to: 1) CareSource in Ohio, 2) BCBS of North Carolina. (Page 90)

Official figures contained in the HHS report provide conflicting figures as to the number of enrollments. FFM [Federally Facilitated Marketplace] statistics show 23,259 cumulative to-date applications submitted as of 10/2/13 and 286 completed plan selections. Earlier numbers show 356 enrollments created as of 7pm on 10/2/13 that were completed with Form 834s sent. (Pages 91-92)

An October 2, 2013, email from HHS Special Assistant Marianne Bowen indicated serious problems with congressional enrollments: “The Congressional issue (68 attempts for Direct enrollment) was an issue stemming from incomplete applications being sent through (started, not finished, sent anyway) and the way the issuers are assigning unique numbers. Turns out there were only 4 complete Direct Enrollment applications that went through, the other 64 were not complete.” (Page 93) [The U.S. Congress has approximately 24,000 professional staffers.]

On October 2, 2013, the Obamacare website had 70,000 page views but only 5,000 were unique visitors, and 48% of registrations failed. The large number of page views may have been the result of visitors repeatedly hitting the “refresh” button due to long waiting times. (Page 106)

It cannot be stressed enough that all of this information was kept from the American people, for no good reason. ObamaCare isn’t some national-security project whose failure would jeopardize public safety, if it became known to America’s enemies. Every one of these developments should have been forthrightly admitted to the public immediately. There is no justification for the Obama Administration keeping us in the dark “for our own good,” to prevent angry voters from acting against the wishes of their benevolent masters in the next election.
Corporatist government-business projects like ObamaCare should be held to far higher standards of accountability and transparency than purely private-sector enterprises, because corporations are ultimately responsible to shareholders, survive only through sustainable business models, and have government regulators breathing down their necks. (And as we saw from the GM recall debacle, when the government becomes senior partner in a corporation, those regulators grow notably less enthusiastic.) There’s no question ObamaCare would be dead and gone if it were a private business; CEO Barack Obama would spend the rest of life in court, or jail, fending off lawsuits from defrauded customers. A document such as the one Judicial Watch unearthed would become prized evidence at the messy ObamaCare Inc. bankruptcy hearings.
But instead, we get far less transparency and accountability when Big Government and Big Business get together to unleash their mutant progeny upon the population. We get spokespeople and their willing media enablers lying about how everything is going fine, when it clearly isn’t. The people who preside over unspeakable disasters are allowed to retire gracefully, with thanks for all their hard work. Top officials cite their lack of awareness of critical problems as a defense against being held responsible for failure.
And even when the media knows that everything they’ve been instructed to relay to us about ObamaCare was a lie, they grant default credibility to the next set of fairy tales, such as the lingering mystery of just how many of the reported ObamaCare “enrollments” are bogus – a question Judicial Watch asks in their press release:

On April 17, 2014, President Obama announced that eight million people had signed up for health insurance on Affordable Healthcare Act exchanges. That figure, however, may be substantially over-inflated. According to testimony in May by the America’s Health Insurance Plans association before the House Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Oversight, “Because of the challenges that surfaced with the launch of the Exchanges in October 2013, some consumers were advised to create a new account and enroll again. As a result, insurers have many duplicate enrollments in their system for which they never received any payment.”
“Once again, Judicial Watch is able to get information through FOIA that no one else had gotten – the specifics about the unmitigated failure of the Obamacare healthcare.gov collapse,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration tried to cover this up, Congress failed to follow through, but we managed to get the truth about the $667 billion Obamacare website. Imagine what would have happened to Obamacare if the American people knew only one person was able to enroll on its first day? What other Obamacare failures is President Obama hiding?”

We’re forced to rely on industry analysts reading tea leaves to guess at the percentage of those 8 million claimed “enrollments” that turn out to be invalid due to non-payment, distorted data, or duplicate data entry – twenty percent? Thirty? Forty? But meanwhile, for a few precious news cycles, the President got to tout an 8 million figure the media knows is wrong, and they let it pass without much in the way of challenge… never mind the flinty-eyed skepticism they should be displaying, coupled with shouted demands for the release of hard data.
ObamaCare is an enduring example of Big Government incompetence and deception, mirrored precisely in the currently exploding VA scandal, which gives Americans a very accurate forecast of what our ultimate, hellish single-payer socialized future will look like. Your future under the combined domination of Big Government and Big Business will be a series of expensive frauds. Truth will be treated like a radioactive isotope that must be kept buried until its political half-life has expired. And if you grow angry when the facts are finally revealed, mainstream media “reporters” will be standing by to insult you for obsessing over old news.
Update: The expanding Serco scandal is another example of the mainstream media sleeping through bad news for ObamaCare. Serco is a contractor that was caught by local media paying a huge staff of employees at an ObamaCare “processing center” to do nothing all day. Another such office has been uncovered in Arkansas… by another Missouri news station. Apparently none of our vaunted mainstream media “reporters” could be bothered to follow upon a story of outrageous taxpayer money wasted in the name of President Boyfriend’s “signature achievement,” so Missouri reporters went to Arkansas to continue the investigation.
Update: Have document requests been filed with the Obama Administration by the local reporters investigating the Serco scandal mentioned above? Why, yes, they have. And maybe one day, six months or a year from now, after a couple of lawsuits, we might finally get to see those documents. But for right now, the usual stonewall is in effect, as the high and mighty mainstream press slumbers on.

Sunday, May 18, 2014

WIRELESS CHAT ROOMS. START TESTING THIS OUT IN YOUR AREA. PATRIOTS THIS APP COULD LET US CONTACT EACH OTHER WHEN OBAMA USES THE INTERNET "KILL SWITCH" AGAINST THE REVOLUTION!

The app that lets you chat WITHOUT an internet or phone connection: FireChat uses hidden iOS feature to relay messages:
THIS APP COULD LET US CONTACT EACH OTHER WHEN OBAMA USES THE INTERNET "KILL SWITCH"

The iOS 7 feature is called Multipeer Connectivity Framework (MCF)
It creates what's called a wireless mesh, or peer-to-peer, network
Instead of sending messages using a mobile signal, the free app creates its own network where each mobile on it becomes a 'node'
This means people in close proximity can message other nodes
Messages are also sent over long distance by relaying data from one node to another anonymously

Buried within the settings of Apple’s iOS 7 is a feature that could revolutionise how we communicate.

Called the Multipeer Connectivity Framework (MCF), it lets you send messages and photos even when a person has no signal.

Now a group of developers has created a free iPhone app called FireChat that takes advantage of this feature - and it even works over long distances.

The FireChat app was developed by the crowdsourced firm Open Garden. When a user opens the app, they can pick a screen name to start sending messages.
Within the app there are 'chatrooms' with 'Everyone' and 'Nearby' options.
The former will search for all users, while the latter option applies to people within Bluetooth and Wi-Fi range who are also using the app.
This is particularly useful when on a plane, or the underground. It can also be used to save money on data plans, for example.
Apple added MCF to its iOS 7 software last year.

It creates what is called a wireless mesh network that connects phones to each other.

In 'Nearby' mode, instead of sending messages using a mobile or data signal, the feature lets users send messages to people in close proximity that are in Bluetooth or Wi-Fi Direct range - up to around 30 feet (9 metres).
It does this by creating a localised network in which each phone becomes a node, and the data is passed between nodes.
Apple uses the framework for its AirDrop feature, for example, which makes it easy to send files and data to other connected iPhone users.

The FireChat app, pictured was developed by Open Garden. In the app there are 'chatrooms' including Everyone and Nearby. The former searches for all users, while the latter applies to people within Bluetooth and Wi-Fi range. It takes advantage of the same iOS 7 tool Apple uses for its AirDrop feature, pictured right

WHAT IS MULTIPEER CONNECTIVITY?

Apple added Multipeer Connectivity Framework (MCF) to its iOS 7 software last year.
It creates what’s called a wireless mesh network that connects phones to each other.
Instead of sending messages using mobile or data signal, the features lets users send messages to people in close proximity that are in Bluetooth or Wi-Fi Direct range - up to around 30 feet (9 metres).
It does this by creating a localised network in which each phone becomes a node and the data is passed between nodes.
Apple uses the framework for its AirDrop feature, for example, which makes it easy to send files and data to other connected iPhone users.

These messages are sent securely, so the individual nodes can’t read them.
Users can also send messages anonymously to avoid snooping, for example, because data is sent from app usernames, as opposed to mobile numbers.
Elsewhere, because the feature doesn’t use an internet connection, it can’t be infiltrated by hackers.
The 'Everyone' Setting allows people to send information further however.
It does this by bringing all its nodes onto one network and relaying messages from one node to another until it reaches the final recipient.
It is not known whether there is a maximum distance the app will work within, and in theory it will work wherever there are nodes, but MailOnline has contacted the company to find out more.
The distance a message can be sent is probably dependent on whether a given region has the nodes needed to relay the messages.
Nodes are simply a vehicle for passing data along a network. On a traditional internet network any device that’s connected to the network is also called a node.
For example, if a network has a phone, tablet, two computers and a printer connected to it there are five nodes on the network.
Each of these devices have a network address which is used to uniquely identify each one. This helps keep track of where data is being transferred to and from on the network.

There is an Android version of the mesh networking feature, developed by Open Garden, but it is not a chat app and is instead used for file sharing.

Description( Click here for the link: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id719829352?mt=8 )

FireChat introduces a new way to chat: "off-the-grid".
Now you can chat with people around you - even if there is no Internet connection or mobile phone coverage. It just works and it’s free.

Could social networks be like parties?

As a step in this direction, the new FireChat introduces a new type of communication: "firechats". These are live, fast-paced, and anonymous group discussions. You can join firechats or move easily from one to another, just as you might when attending a party.

And you can also create your own firechats, about the topics, people or communities that interest you - whether it's the NY Yankees, UC San Diego, Game of Thrones, League of Legends or Italian food.

Last but not least, firechats work even if no connection to the Internet or cellular phone coverage is available.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

THE BOKO HARAM - BENGHAZI CONNECTION WITH THER OBAMA CABAL.. READ AND SHARE!!

THIS IS HOW THE OUSTING OF KHADAFI, ARMING THE LIBYAN REBELS, THE BENGHAZI ATTACK, THE SMUGGLING OF ARMS OUT OF LIBYA TO ARM SYRIAN REBELS AND OTHER AL QAEDA GROUPS..

GAVE BOKO HARAM THE WEAPONS TO WAGE ISLAMIC JIHAD TODAY!
Since 2010, Boko Haram Islamists have perpetrated drive-by shootings and suicide bombings that have killed 1,548 people. Boko Haram, which means "Western education is sacrilege," has said it wants its imprisoned Jihadi Islamists released and for the current Nigerian government to institute Sharia law throughout the nation.

READ ON...
( For more details on the Benghazi Story click here : http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2013/05/president-obama-former-secretary-of.html)

When the revolt first broke out against Libyan dictator Muamar Gadhafi in March, 2011, the Obama administration determined to remove him from power. Not because it was necessary, because he’d long passed his “sell-by” date as an evil mastermind, but because it could. Unlike the peaceful decamping of the dictators in Tunisia and Egypt, this would be a test bed on how to overthrow a dictator on the cheap.
The first problem was arming the rebels. Libya was under a UN arms embargo and any movement of arms into Libya would be illegal if you really care about such flummery.

Arming the Libyan Rebels

We know the Obama administration encouraged France, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar to arm the rebels. The Egyptians did so from their own volition because they shared a common ideology with the rebels: a particularly violent form of islamofascism.
We know that the idea of the US arming the Libyan rebels was hotly debated inside the administration with the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, seemingly the most enchanted with the idea of arms trafficking:

-The Obama administration is engaged in a fierce debate over whether to supply weapons to the rebels in Libya, senior officials said on Tuesday, with some fearful that providing arms would deepen American involvement in a civil war and that some fighters may have links to Al Qaeda.
The debate has drawn in the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon, these officials said, and has prompted an urgent call for intelligence about a ragtag band of rebels who are waging a town-by-town battle against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, from a base in eastern Libya long suspected of supplying terrorist recruits
…
While Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the administration had not yet decided whether to actually transfer arms, she reiterated that the United States had a right to do so, despite an arms embargo on Libya, because of the United Nations Security Council’s broad resolution authorizing military action to protect civilians.
…
Gene A. Cretz, the American ambassador to Libya, said last week that he was impressed by the democratic instincts of the opposition leaders and that he did not believe that they were dominated by extremists. But he acknowledged that there was no way to know if they were “100 percent kosher, so to speak.”

We also know that John McCain (Songbird McCain http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2013/06/22/songbird-john-mccain-made-more-than-32-communist-videos-against-united-states/ ) was in favor of arming the rebels,
Eventually, covert aid was authorized for the Libyan rebels and though we have no direct evidence of US running arms we know that the Obama's CIA had an on the ground presence. We know Obama was not opposed to the idea of running arms to the rebels.

Obama said the U.S. had not ruled out providing military hardware to rebels.
‘It’s fair to say that if we wanted to get weapons into Libya, we probably could. We’re looking at all our options at this point,’ the President told ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer.

And we know that $200 million worth of small arms was shipped by an American arms dealer to Qatar with an export license granted by the US government.

The case of Marc Turi, the American arms merchant who had sought to provide weapons to Libya, demonstrates other challenges the United States faced in dealing with Libya. A dealer who lives in both Arizona and Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, Mr. Turi sells small arms to buyers in the Middle East and Africa, relying primarily on suppliers of Russian-designed weapons in Eastern Europe.
In March 2011, just as the Libyan civil war was intensifying, Mr. Turi realized that Libya could be a lucrative new market, and applied to the State Department for a license to provide weapons to the rebels there, according to e-mails and other documents he has provided. (American citizens are required to obtain United States approval for any international arms sales.)
He also e-mailed J. Christopher Stevens, then the special representative to the Libyan rebel alliance. The diplomat said he would “share” Mr. Turi’s proposal with colleagues in Washington, according to e-mails provided by Mr. Turi. Mr. Stevens, who became the United States ambassador to Libya, was one of the four Americans killed in the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11.
Mr. Turi’s application for a license was rejected in late March 2011. Undeterred, he applied again, this time stating only that he planned to ship arms worth more than $200 million to Qatar. In May 2011, his application was approved. Mr. Turi, in an interview, said that his intent was to get weapons to Qatar and that what “the U.S. government and Qatar allowed from there was between them.”

When you read news coverage of the period (set your Google search dates for the period February 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011) you get the feeling that the policy consensus was that running guns to the Libyan rebels had some risks but the benefits far outweighed those risks. You find no major players writing or speaking against the idea and, curiously, coverage of the debate disappears within a week of the approval of covert aid to Libya.

Letting the Arms Get Away

To no one’s great surprise outside the White House, the weapons we directly or indirectly provided to the Libyan rebels, now known to be largely al Qaeda, slipped from western control.

The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

We don’t know what “some” means, but as much as $500 million worth of foreign weapons may have found their way into al Qaeda hands in Libya.

Boko Haram

Boko Haram has been in the news recently both because of their savage attacks in Nigeria, such as the one that resulted in over 240 school girls kidnapped and Michelle Obama beclowning herself with a Twitter hashtag picture.

,
If you look at the timeline of Boko Haram attacks, you are struck by how they coincide with the arming of the Libyan rebels and how they increase in ferocity following the death of Gaddafi. That is because those arms have made their way from Libya to Nigeria via Boko Haram’s al Qaeda connection.

Boko Haram, under the leadership of fiery, gun-toting militant Abubakar Shekau, is thought to be getting closer to achieving its dream of creating some kind of Islamic rule in the lawless areas around Lake Chad, where even the police have fled.
“They are now holding territory,” Kole Shettima, chairman of the Centre for Democracy and Development, said. “The next step is to create institutions: justice, social services,” as Malian Islamists did before the French forced them out of its cities.
The Bama attack showed their substantial firepower, including machine guns, large numbers of rocket propelled grenades (RPGs) and pick-up trucks mounted with anti-aircraft guns, a sign the weapons flood from the Libyan war that helped rebels seize parts of Mali last year has reached Nigeria, officials say.

Oddly enough, one of the reasons Glen Doherty, who was killed in the phony-scandal on our Benghazi consulate, was in Libya was to try to regain control of more sophisticated weapons, such as man-portable air defense systems, that were in circulation.
The US participation in the overthrow of Gaddafi was ill advised. For no greater reason than to make a political point, the Obama administration encouraged allies to arm al Qaeda fighters in Libya and evidence indicates that after March 2011 we were arming them directly. The result was that Libya became an armed camp and al Qaeda safe haven.
A foreseeable consequence of this policy was al Qaeda in Libya becoming a supplier of arms to its affiliates in Africa. As a result, the victory on the cheap in Libya is substantially destabilizing the northern rim of Sub-Saharan Africa.
The Obama administration has sown the wind by its benighted policy in Libya, now the resulting whirlwind is being reaped in Nigeria.

*********************************ITS TIME TO STOP OBAMA AND HIS CABAL.... EMPOWERING ISLAMISTS AND JIHADIS AROUND THE WORLD!

REVOLUTION NOW AMERICA !!

Friday, May 9, 2014

A Pope who was "selected" by the Socialist Cabal that used the NSA Evesdropping to Blackmail the last Pope to resign... Now makes his master directed play!!

The New Socialist Pope's Wealth Redistribution exposes his true colors.

His "Economic Plan" is pure unadulterated Socialist Bullshit hidden behind a curtain of incense and myrrh and smoke and mirrors.

Pope Francis demands wealth redistribution. He forgets St. John Paul's recognition of the "positive role of business, the market, private property" as "the model which ought to be proposed" for the Third World.

Addressing U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and other officials on Friday, the first supreme pontiff from Latin America called for "the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the state."
Excuse the irreverence, but his holiness may be forgetting the hundreds of millions of souls whose lives have been improved, lengthened, even saved by maximizing capitalism and minimizing government.
As Steve Forbes points out, "capitalism is more moral than any and all alternatives," producing over the last 300 years "more advances — in incomes, standard of living, social mobility and longevity — than in all the previous centuries put together."
George Gilder, in "Wealth and Poverty," often referred to as the Bible of the Reagan White House, observed: "Capitalism begins with giving. Not through greed, avarice or even self-love can one expect the rewards of commerce, but from a spirit closely akin to altruism, a regard for the needs of others. ... Not taking and consuming, but giving, risking and creating are the characteristic roles of the capitalist."
Calls for government to rectify "inequality" are based on a fallible assumption: that wealth is finite, not created by free human beings. With statism rising in Russia and China, and the New Deal entrenched in America, Ludwig von Mises in 1949 posed the choice between capitalism and socialism as choosing "between social cooperation and the disintegration of society."
Von Mises and other champions of the free market weren't foes of Christian charity. "We may fully endorse the religious and ethical precepts that declare it to be man's duty to assist his unlucky brethren whom nature has doomed," he wrote. The question is "what methods should be resorted to" in doing that duty. If government is in charge, "the discretion of bureaucrats is substituted for the discretion of people whom an inner voice drives to acts of charity."
That inevitably means massive waste, corruption and other unintended negative consequences.
Pope John Paul II, canonized as a saint by Pope Francis just last month, addressed capitalism's morality in 1991, asking if "capitalism should be the goal of the countries now making efforts to rebuild their economy and society" and "the model which ought to be proposed to the countries of the Third World which are searching for the path to true economic and civil progress?"
His conclusion: If capitalism "recognizes the fundamental and positive role of business, the market, private property and the resulting responsibility for the means of production, as well as free human creativity in the economic sector, then the answer is certainly in the affirmative" — although "market economy" or "free economy" might be a more accurate name than capitalism.
Pope Francis' fans extol his open-mindedness. We hope he'll open the great books by von Mises, Adam Smith, Friedrich von Hayek, Milton Friedman and others that make the powerful moral case for free markets.

Pope Francis has spent a year on the Throne of Peter. In that time, his modest style and high-minded ideals have ignited a new optimism and fervor among Roman Catholics, including those who left because of disagreements with some of its teachings.

Francis has gone out of his way to voice support for the world’s poorest citizens, rightly noting that their plight is too often ignored or brushed aside.

Until this week, his statements have called for voluntary action by wealthier countries and individuals as the right way to relieve economic inequality. He appealed to our better selves, and in so doing, made us all ask if we could be kinder and more generous. The answer, of course, is yes.

On Friday, however, Francis chose a meeting with – of all people -- officials of the United Nations to endorse what he called “the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the state, as well as indispensable cooperation between the private sector and civil society.”

By appearing to sanction what amounts to forced redistribution, Francis grievously exceeded his authority and became what amounts to a robe-wearing politician.

By appearing to sanction what amounts to forced redistribution, Francis grievously exceeded his authority and became what amounts to a robe-wearing politician. He also exposed his Church, one of the wealthiest institutions in the world, to inevitable charges of hypocrisy. And he put himself in a position of having to back up his frothy talk with ruinous action.

Let’s see: for starters, perhaps the Catholic Church and its affiliated non-profit organizations should start voluntarily paying income and real estate tax in the United States, from which it has traditionally been exempt. Yeah how about that??

There is no doubt that the addition of tax revenue from the Church would be considerable, if hard to estimate. The 17,000-plus parishes may not all measure up to architectural wonders like St. Patrick’s in New York or the newer Our Lady of the Angels in Los Angeles. But few Catholic churches have absolutely no value. What would 39.5% of all that be?

How could Francis, or his subordinates in the United States object to voluntarily turning over part of their vast revenue?

The notion of the church paying taxes is certainly not heretical. Italy – which surrounds Vatican City where the pope lives – began taxing Catholic Church property last year as a way of helping to relieve its enormous economic problems. At last check, St. Peter’s was still standing.

Further, Francis might consider selling off the artworks stored at the Vatican museum and in churches throughout the world, and the thousands upon thousands of ancient books and manuscripts in its library.

The Pietá, for instance, should fetch a pretty penny, especially if the buyer is, say, a backer of Al Qaeda who can afford to smash it to pieces as soon as it is acquired.

The Pope is the head of the Church. He is the Vicar of Christ and is infallible on matters of doctrine.

When it comes to economics, however, Francis should stick to making suggestions for how to voluntarily reduce economic inequality and leave tax policy to the politicians.

Perhaps he can help by offering a prayer for them. God knows, they need it.

YES I SAY THE POPE SHOULD STICK TO TALKING OF GOD AND THE HEREAFTER.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

ARREST OBAMA FOR FALSE REPRESENTATION OF WHO HE IS. ARREST HIS ENABLERS TOO!

Who IS This Man? HE IS A FAKE!!

For over years now, We the People have been asking this question, “Who is this man?” Today we are no closer to the answer than before. In fact, we become more confused by the day.
Is his name Barack Hussein Obama II, as contended in two books arguably written by him and on a specious COLB presented to a gullible lamestream media on partisan blogs and campaign websites? Or is his name Barack Obama Jr., as he was called in the infamous FactCheck blog defense of his British/Kenyan citizenship? Or is his name Barry Obama, as (it is claimed) he was known in school in Hawaii? Or is his name Barry Soetoro, as school registration forms from Indonesia seem to indicate? Or is his name Soebarkah, as his mother’s passport records seem to indicate? (A one word name, in keeping with Indonesian tradition, because he was adopted by his stepfather.) Or is his name Barry Dunham, Steve Dunham, or the latest: Barrack Houssein Obama II, as indicated on records from a U.S. MILITARY Court-Martial of patriotic American, LTC Lakin, who himself put his life and freedom on the line in a quest to learn the answer to this question: WHO IS THIS MAN?
Link to the records; see for yourself:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37124816/Court-Martial-of-LTC-Terrence-Lakin-Ruling-on-Discovery-2-Sep-2010

Why would a transcript from a U.S. government court-martial refer to the president of the United States as Barrack Houssein Obama II? Has anyone before seen that spelling of his name? What does this court, this judge, know that We the People do not know? Will this man answer our question: WHO ARE YOU?
This is an open thread. Feel free to comment at will. I’d like to request, also, that anyone who can, please tell us what is represented on those gold drapes that this POTUS is so frequently photographed in front of. In addition, can anyone familiar with Muslim names, please inform us as to the possible differences in meaning between Barack versus Barrack, and Hussein versus Houssein?

UPDATE, 9/15/2010.

I forgot this alias: Barack Abdallah Husein Obama, kindly provided to us by this Tanzanian online newspaper.
http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/magazines/32-political-platform/2708-zanzibar-could-reverse-trend-to-have-president-from-pemba.html
Second UPDATE of the day:
Baracka Hussein Abu Amama from http://www.alarabiya.net/views/2010/08/24/117453.html
They post that his mother changed Abu Amama to Obama. Goodness gracious. How many names do YOU have?
UPDATE 11/01/2010: We have yet another name for this person, “Wuod Sarah”, Dholuo for “the son of Sarah.” In addition, persons who know Luo naming conventions have pointed out that his name, technically, should be Barack Hussein. Just that. No Obama.
UPDATE 06/05/2011:   Lawyer Stephen Pidgeon claims that Barry’s name was changed to its current form from Barak Mounir Ubayd in British Columbia in 1982.
UPDATE 09/01/2011: Researchers turned up an alias for Barry: Harrison J. Bounel. During the 2008 campaign, Obama was adopted by a Native American family (Crow) and given this name: Awe Kooda bilaxpak Kuuxshish
UPDATE 09/07/2011: h/t Kathy and Gateway Pundit. Gaddafi the tyrant of Libya wrote to Barry: “Our dear son, Excellency, Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama, your intervention in the name of the U.S.A. is a must, so that Nato (NATO) would withdraw finally from the Libyan affair.” A commenter on another blog explained that Abu in Arabic means “the father of”, and Oumama refers to Obama’s daughters because it means the female children of Umama, the Arabic root of Obama. Makes sense. But here’s another name and it seems Gaddafi is tweaking him, doesn’t it? What does Gaddafi know? Strangely enough, the man who owned the home where Obama’s Uncle Omar lived when he was arrested for DUI and evading a deportation order is named Ouma.   This man also owned the home where Uncle Omar lived in 1987-1991, when the IRS placed a lien against Omar for non-payment of taxes. So Mr. Ouma helped Omar for over twenty years. Is he kin? Did he shorten his name to Ouma, a variation of Obama?
UPDATE: March 5, 2012: When Obama appeared in a panel discussion with other Alinsky-lovers in 1998, his name was advertised on a poster as Senator BARAKA Obama. Minutes of a Board of Education from Paterson, NJ, where they talked about students being introduced to IL State Sen. Baraka Obama. Now where did they get that spelling? h/t SEO.
UPDATE: April 17, 2012: Obama carved his name in cement near his school in Hawaii: King Obama.
In a hearing before an administrative law judge, about Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the New Jersey primary ballot, Judge Jeff S. Maslin dismissed the complaint against Barak Obama (p. 7). On the first two pages of the ruling, which seem to reprise the petitioners’ filing, Barack Obama is referred to as “the respondent” and “president”. But which is his LEGAL name?   Does the judge know? Is that why the judge used Barak, while the petitioners used Barack?
UPDATE: March 3, 2013: Obama apparently used the name Barack Soetoro at Columbia University, 2960 Broadway, in NYC.ARREST THIS MAN... HE IS A FRAUD!!!

SO WHAT IS HIS NAME ???

Barack Hussein Obama II
Barack Obama Jr.
Barry Obama
Barry Soetoro
Soebarkah
Barry Dunham
Steve Dunham
Barrack Houssein Obama II (U.S. Military – Lakin)
Barack Abdallah Husein Obama (Tanzanian newspaper)
Baracka Hussein Abu Amama (Abu Amama changed to Obama)
Barack Hussein
Wuod Sarah - (Dholuo for the “Son of Sarah”)
Barak Mounir Ubayd (Stephen Pidgeon – British Columbia)
Harrison J. Bounel – (Name associated with SSN).
Awe Kooda bilaxpak Kuuxshish – (Crow adoption)
Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (Gaddafi, Libya)
Baraka Obama (Alinsky Poster -Breitbart)
The One
Zero
King Obama (written in cement by Obama)
Barak Obama (NJ ALJ Jeff S. Maslin, ruling, p. 7)
Barack Soetoro

ARREST OBAMA FOR FALSE REPRESENTATION OF WHO HE IS. ARREST HIS ENABLERS TOO!

Who IS This Man? HE IS A FAKE!!

UPDATE, 9/15/2010.

I forgot this alias: Barack Abdallah Husein Obama, kindly provided to us by this Tanzanian online newspaper.
http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/magazines/32-political-platform/2708-zanzibar-could-reverse-trend-to-have-president-from-pemba.html
Second UPDATE of the day:
Baracka Hussein Abu Amama from http://www.alarabiya.net/views/2010/08/24/117453.html
They post that his mother changed Abu Amama to Obama. Goodness gracious. How many names do YOU have?
UPDATE 11/01/2010: We have yet another name for this person, “Wuod Sarah”, Dholuo for “the son of Sarah.” In addition, persons who know Luo naming conventions have pointed out that his name, technically, should be Barack Hussein. Just that. No Obama.
UPDATE 06/05/2011:   Lawyer Stephen Pidgeon claims that Barry’s name was changed to its current form from Barak Mounir Ubayd in British Columbia in 1982.
UPDATE 09/01/2011: Researchers turned up an alias for Barry: Harrison J. Bounel. During the 2008 campaign, Obama was adopted by a Native American family (Crow) and given this name: Awe Kooda bilaxpak Kuuxshish
UPDATE 09/07/2011: h/t Kathy and Gateway Pundit. Gaddafi the tyrant of Libya wrote to Barry: “Our dear son, Excellency, Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama, your intervention in the name of the U.S.A. is a must, so that Nato (NATO) would withdraw finally from the Libyan affair.” A commenter on another blog explained that Abu in Arabic means “the father of”, and Oumama refers to Obama’s daughters because it means the female children of Umama, the Arabic root of Obama. Makes sense. But here’s another name and it seems Gaddafi is tweaking him, doesn’t it? What does Gaddafi know? Strangely enough, the man who owned the home where Obama’s Uncle Omar lived when he was arrested for DUI and evading a deportation order is named Ouma.   This man also owned the home where Uncle Omar lived in 1987-1991, when the IRS placed a lien against Omar for non-payment of taxes. So Mr. Ouma helped Omar for over twenty years. Is he kin? Did he shorten his name to Ouma, a variation of Obama?
UPDATE: March 5, 2012: When Obama appeared in a panel discussion with other Alinsky-lovers in 1998, his name was advertised on a poster as Senator BARAKA Obama. Minutes of a Board of Education from Paterson, NJ, where they talked about students being introduced to IL State Sen. Baraka Obama. Now where did they get that spelling? h/t SEO.
UPDATE: April 17, 2012: Obama carved his name in cement near his school in Hawaii: King Obama.
In a hearing before an administrative law judge, about Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the New Jersey primary ballot, Judge Jeff S. Maslin dismissed the complaint against Barak Obama (p. 7). On the first two pages of the ruling, which seem to reprise the petitioners’ filing, Barack Obama is referred to as “the respondent” and “president”. But which is his LEGAL name?   Does the judge know? Is that why the judge used Barak, while the petitioners used Barack?
UPDATE: March 3, 2013: Obama apparently used the name Barack Soetoro at Columbia University, 2960 Broadway, in NYC.
ARREST THIS MAN... HE IS A FRAUD!!!

SO WHAT IS HIS NAME ???

Barack Hussein Obama II
Barack Obama Jr.
Barry Obama
Barry Soetoro
Soebarkah
Barry Dunham
Steve Dunham
Barrack Houssein Obama II (U.S. Military – Lakin)
Barack Abdallah Husein Obama (Tanzanian newspaper)
Baracka Hussein Abu Amama (Abu Amama changed to Obama)
Barack Hussein
Wuod Sarah - (Dholuo for the “Son of Sarah”)
Barak Mounir Ubayd (Stephen Pidgeon – British Columbia)
Harrison J. Bounel – (Name associated with SSN).
Awe Kooda bilaxpak Kuuxshish – (Crow adoption)
Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (Gaddafi, Libya)
Baraka Obama (Alinsky Poster -Breitbart)
The One
Zero
King Obama (written in cement by Obama)
Barak Obama (NJ ALJ Jeff S. Maslin, ruling, p. 7)
Barack Soetoro

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Communist China to beat Capitalist America in a Global Economic Battle? REALLY ? WTF??

China poised to pass US as world’s leading economic power this year

By Chris Giles, Economics Editor

The US is on the brink of losing its status as the world’s largest economy, and is likely to slip behind China this year, sooner than widely anticipated, according to the world’s leading statistical agencies.

The US has been the global leader since overtaking the UK in 1872. Most economists previously thought China would pull ahead in 2019.

China’s crisis is coming – the only question is how big it will be

Financial crisis in China has become inevitable. If it happens soon, its effects can be contained. But, if policy makers use further doses of stimulus to postpone the day of reckoning, a severe collapse will become unavoidable within a few years.
The country is in the middle of by far the largest monetary expansion in history. On one widely used measure, M2, its money supply has tripled in the past six years, an expansion four times as large as that of the US over the same period.

With the IMF expecting China’s economy to have grown 24 per cent between 2011 and 2014 while the US is expected to expand only 7.6 per cent, China is likely to overtake the US this year.

The figures revolutionise the picture of the world’s economic landscape, boosting the importance of large middle-income countries. India becomes the third-largest economy having previously been in tenth place. The size of its economy almost doubled from 19 per cent of the US in 2005 to 37 per cent in 2011.

Russia, Brazil, Indonesia and Mexico make the top 12 in the global table. In contrast, high costs and lower growth push the UK and Japan further behind the US than in the 2005 tables while Germany improved its relative position a little and Italy remained the same.
The findings will intensify arguments about control over global international organisations such as the World Bank and IMF, which are increasingly out of line with the balance of global economic power.

When looking at the actual consumption per head, the report found the new methodology as well as faster growth in poor countries have “greatly reduced” the gap between rich and poor, “suggesting that the world has become more equal”.
The world’s rich countries still account for 50 per cent of global GDP while containing only 17 per cent of the world’s population.
Having compared the actual cost of living in different countries, the report also found that the four most expensive countries to live in are Switzerland, Norway, Bermuda and Australia, with the cheapest being Egypt, Pakistan, Myanmar and Ethiopia.

Please share this article with others using the link below, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d79ffff8-cfb7-11e3-9b2b-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz30TytbeQN

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

EXPOSED.... THE REASONS WHY HARRY REID WANTS THE BUNDY RANCH. Harry Reid’s BLM Land Scams, Bribes, Mafia Links and Nepotism!

Harry Reid’s BLM Land Scams, Bribes, Mafia Links and Nepotism!

This is way more than a grievance about unpaid ‘grazing fees’, as Senator Harry Reid’s involvement with BLM is evidence of how Agenda 21-led policies are rapidly seeping out of the Capitol Hill swamp.Liberal oriented media, along with their neo-conservative counterparts on the right, are once again reading from the same page and conveniently over concerned with Cliven Bundy’s alleged ‘racist’ comments than they are about Americans’ having the ability to retain their inherent constitutional rights as a whole.

UPDATED 5/2/14

Smoking BLM Gun – Public Records – Harry Reid Owns 93 Acres Next to Bundy Ranch

While Senator Harry Reid professes that he is running the Bundy cattle off of public land because it’s the right thing to do, evidence indicates that Dirty Harry might have a personal interest in seeing that the Bundy’s join the other 52 ranchers they’ve run out of business.
Parcels held by an entity, Reid Bunkerville, LLC, which is partially owned by the Nevada Senator are in close proximity to the Bundy ranch.
The parcels appear to be in the path of future development, which may even involve a freeway interchange and loop, all west of Bunkerville in the same general area as those “trespass cattle.”
The parcel numbers below link to the Clark County Assessor’s Office, with all of the pertinent information and property descriptions shown.
They total 93.33 acres in size.

Reid Bunkerville L L C Dst-901 # 002-26-301-002

Reid Bunkerville L L C Dst-800 #002-26-301-004
Reid Bunkerville L L C Dst-800 #002-26-301-005
Reid Bunkerville L L C Dst-800 #002-26-701-001

The ‘race storm’ media buzz turned out to be a well-crafted hoax, engineered by left-wing Media Matters and the New York Times, and a deliberate attempt to divert the public’s attention away from the obvious federal government despotism on display two weeks ago in Bunkerville, Nevada – the latest federal power grab in a frightening trend which is presently overrunning the United States today.

IMAGE: ‘Dirty’ Harry Reid – A Democratic United States Senator from Nevada and Senate Majority Leader, is at the center of controversy over his support of the forced seizure of cattle at the Bundy Ranch and his involvement in the acquisition of land in Nevada, as well as his ties to former aide Neil Kornze, who is now a director at the Bureau of Land Management. (photo credit truthrevolt.org)Nevada and the BLM land scam Former Nevada Gaming Comissioner, now Democratic Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, appears to have made a lucrative career out of ‘gaming’ the political system, seemingly for his own personal gain. His role in the siege at Cliven Bundy’s ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada, has only started to unfold, revealing highly questionable connections to the Chinese energy corporation ENN, through its Nevada counterpart ENN Mojave Energy. The land deal was reportedly a steal for Chinese business investors, who were set to receive a sweetheart deal of 87 percent discount for the shadowy land purchase.

Reid has also maintained a longstanding history with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Nevada, a corporate division of the US Department of Interior. The BLM oversees public land acting as a manager for the United States government and Reid and his crony associates have been caught distorting laws for development projects across the state of Nevada for many years, abusing environmental protection clauses to ‘fast track’ unsavory land deals. Reid worked behind the scenes with BLM to change the boundaries of the desert tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the planned development of a top financial donor, Harvey Whittemore.

Attorney Jonathan Emmord explains, “The desert tortoise is only a justification against development of those who are not politically connected to Reid. Whittemore gave Reid and Reid’s Political Action Committee $45,000. If Cliven Bundy were a Reid financial backer, his fate might well be different, but he is not. Bundy opposes Reid.”

IMAGE: Like Father, Like Son – Rory Reid of Lionel Sawyer & Collins, the well-known law firm, functions as lobbying group out of Nevada, largely because of its Las Vegas hotel and casino connections. (photo credit burstupdates.wordpress.com)For self-appointed oligarchs, it’s always important to keep the money in the family, and if one member of the family controls the political strings, then it’s a fairly straight forward operation. Harry Reid, the highest ranking Democratic Senator, is said to have been busy brokering a $5 Billion dollar deal to secure a solar farm site in Laughlin, Nevada – through his son Rory Reid, a shareholder and attorney at Lionel Sawyer & Collins, heading the law firm’s Gaming and Regulatory Law Department. Emmord adds here:

“Reid has been one of the project’s most prominent advocates, helping recruit the company during a 2011 trip to China and applying his political muscle on behalf of the project.”

“Chinese magnate Wang Yusuo, with an estimated net worth of $2.2 billion, owns ENN Group. In 2011 Reid ventured to ENN’s headquarters in Langfang, China, to tour the company and then worked to get this enormous company favored by the Chinese Communist government to take on development of a massive solar energy project in southern Nevada that would endeavor to supply California with 30% of its energy needs. Wang spoke at Reid’s Fourth Annual National Clean Energy Summit last year.”

This cozy little set-up violates all fundamental ethics regarding an elected official’s conflict of interest code, but these days in Washington DC, guilt-free corruption has become the norm, as Senators spend most their quality time lining theirs and their family’s pockets while in office – with the US taxpayer covering all of their ‘business overheads’.

IMAGE: ‘The 64th Legislator’ – Harvey Whittemore a former lawyer and lobbyist for the Lionel Sawyer & Collins – He’s maintained a close supportive relationship with Senator Harry Reid over the years, having helped out four of Reid’s sons get their start at the well-known law firm in Nevada. He has been the subject of a controversial land deal called Coyote Springs. Attorney John Dawson also worked at the firm and allegedly transferred funds for the firm to offshore accounts in the Cook Islands.(photo credit freebeacon.com) Partners in crime
Harvey Whittemore, was a senior managing partner at Rory Reid’s law firm, Lionel Sawyer & Collins, and was once the firm’s top lobbyist. A close friend of Harry Reid, he was convicted on three out of four felony charges and sentenced to two years in jail for contributing nearly $150,000 in illegal funds to Senator Reid’s re-election committee in 2007. In May of 2013, a federal jury found Whittemore – a close friend of Reid’s, guilty of the charges levied against him and he was ordered to pay $100,000 dollars in fines and is set to serve time behind bars. Incredibly, but like so many scandals of this sort, Senator Reid managed to brush off his part in the corruption scandal, most likely with the help of ‘friends’ in high places – like the White House.

Another solar farm company Brightsource Energy was slated to benefit greatly from the Whittemore Coyote Springs development and all the perks that came with the federal land easement. The land was leased to Brightsource from Whittemore’s company and was considered a fast track land deal and federal money received through the American Recovery and Reinvestment act (ARRA) that was granted to Nevada via a government stimulus. Harry Reid reportedly received more money from alternative energy for his campaign than any other lawmaker. In 2003, Whittemore is said to have sold company interests in the Wingfield Nevada Group and its affiliate LLC, Coyote Springs Investment to Thomas Seeno and his brother, Alberto Seeno, both development corporations were linked to a $30 billion dollar land deal on 43,000 acres just North of Las Vegas. The Seenos’ a 70-year Nevada family dynasty, with alleged ties to organized crime, became the subject of a federal investigation by several agencies in 2010, for a number crimes including tax debt, extortion and fraud.

The corruption in this story leads right up to Washington DC. In 2007, the Seeno family reportedly contributed $38,800 dollars to Harry Reid’s re-election bid. Congress moved for ‘Federal easement’ in 2004, accepting Whittemore’s $10.4 million dollars penance payment in the process while pushing the Coyote Spring’s project forward. Whittemore’s Coyote Springs company and the Bureau of Land Management was subsequently sued by two public lands issue groups over what was said to be an illegal land swap in 2006. Senator Reid has been said to have helped facilitate Whittemore’s corrupt Coyote Springs development project by procuring the necessary ‘environmental waivers’.

In 1998, Whittemore paid a defense contractor named Aerojet-General Corp $15 million for the title of the privately owned land for the Coyote Springs site. He also managed to negotiated for the same “rent-free government lease of the tortoise habitat” for his new friends. Whittemore was said to have pushed for an “unrestricted use” of the tortoise habitat within the project area.

“The law clearly wouldn’t allow a ‘boundary adjustment’ of 10,000 acres,” said Janine Blaeloch of the Western Lands Project, a group that advocates for public lands. “Congress drew the map of the leased lands. Congress would have to change it.” – (LA Times) The suit against BLM and Coyote Springs was upheld by Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, who was a District Judge in 2007 prior to defeating Rory Reid in the race for Governor in 2010. Sandoval has seemingly been engineered for a future Vice Presidential slot. Interestingly, he’s also said to be one of the few GOP Governor’s in the United States that is actively implementing Obamacare much to the chagrin of those on the right and those for individual sovereignty on that issue.

Nevada: America’s Most Politically Corrupt State

The Governor of Nevada was also named in a court case involving the Employer’s Insurance Company of Nevada (EICON) while he was Attorney General, accusing Sandoval of taking part in or at least turning a blind eye to a multi-billion dollar transfer of funds over the last decade involving the insurance company – when it should have been put in a Trust held at the Nevada State Treasury. While Sandoval has initially come out in support of the Bundy’s during their standoff with the BLM and stifled some controversial land deals during his time as a District Judge, though it should be noted that his interests in these events should be held under scrutiny. In the political den of corruption that is Nevada, public officials spend a great deal of time and effort reinventing their public image in order to ready themselves for their next step up the political latter, as the political machine in Nevada feeds directly into the Washington DC machine.

In 2010, Utah Attorney General John Swallow was also implicated, apparently helping to engineer what has been described as a ‘bribe’ between a well-known Utah businessman Jeremy Johnson, and of course… Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

A lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) led to an investigation into Johnson due to credit charges and for allegedly misrepresenting products that were sold through a company called I Works and its shadowy collection of ‘shell’ companies. It has been said that Johnson’s company took in around $350 million dollars between 2006 – 2010. Even though it appears as though his business practices were unsavory, he contends he was made to believe he could pay Harry Reid $600,000 dollars to make the federal investigation into his company ‘disappear’. Once again, and somehow – the scandal doesn’t stick to Dirty Harry.

Rigging the Game There have been other alleged connections to organized crime for Senator Reid, perhaps most notably through Attorney Jay Brown, a lawyer with his feet close to the casino mob fire, and a longtime family and business associate of Reid’s. Brown has been the subject of numerous investigations over the years and in 1981 settled a federal securities case out of court.

In the late 1990′s Reid apparently bought two plots land in Nevada, one outright and the other with Jay Brown and in 2001, Reid sold it to a company created by Brown for an equal share in the company. Reid never disclosed this sale to Congress, and in the process the land was still listed as an asset. Reid reportedly collected $1.1 million in the process. Reid’s name was never formally attached to Brown’s company, however in 2006, he filed a correction to his ethics form for a ‘better representation’ of the land deal that took place. Again, the scandal somehow slides off the back of Senator Reid.
It appears that BLM, Senator Reid, as well as a host of shadowy casino characters and corrupt lawyers – have gamed the system when it comes to Nevada and Utah land deals, operating a golden circle of business seemingly outside of anything that would be considered ethical, or even legal for that matter.

IMAGE: The Western Way – The Battle of Bunkerville seemed as though it was on the verge of a another Sagebrush Rebellion, the BLM installed free speech zones and rounded up nearly 400 cattle, violating the Bundy’s constitutional rights. (photo credit la.indymedia.org)More BLM Land Grabs Taking Place

Unabashed and with the blessing of President Obama, the BLM are reportedly ready to grab another 90,000 acres of privately owned land in Texas after being turned away at the Bundy ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada.

Some have suggested the Bundy’s may have ‘prescriptive rights’ as to where their cattle can graze, as reported by Ben Swann:

“Montana cattle rancher Todd Devlin says the BLM is now considering new ways of dealing with the Cliven Bundy situation. Devlin, is not just a Montana cattle rancher, but is also a County Commissioner in Prairie County Montana and he has worked with the Department of Interior, having taught workshops for the agency in the past. Monday, Devlin reached out to his contacts in the Department of the Interior to find out why the Bureau of Land Management has refused to work with Bundy rather than simply attempting to run over him.” Delvin posed the question about the possibility of prescriptive rights being used in the Bundy Ranch case:

“Is it possible that this guy (Cliven Bundy) has prescriptive rights?” The response from top officials at the BLM, “We are worried that he might, and he might use that defense.”
Prescriptive Rights legally allow anyone who qualifies the right to use land, if a person or persons have been using that land for at least 5 years without legal action taken by the property owner, as outlined by Ben Swann:

“Because Bundy stopped paying his grazing fees to the BLM in 1993 but continued to use the land for over 20 years, it is possible he now has prescriptive rights to the land.”

IMAGE: A historic standoff with federal agents - The the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) tried unsuccessfully to intimidate Cliven Bundy (seen above) and his family into giving up their sovereignty, cattle, as well as their land. However, some have suggested this event has been a staged provocation between two historically powerful families (Bundy & Reid) meant to gauge public reaction and potentially propel the patriot movement into dissolution. There is nothing concrete to support this claim and it could be seen as a diversion. (photo credit thesleuthjournal.com)

IMAGE: A Solar Landscape – An overview of proposed solar projects throughout Nevada aided by Nevada politician’s like Harry Reid and the BLM. The Bundy Ranch is close to three such sites (photo credit libertyunyielding.com)In addition to Reid’s BLM connections, there has been other disturbing news out of Nevada, implicating Special Agent in Charge of BLM, Daniel P Love and his alleged interest in the BLM siege at the Bundy Ranch, lying to the public about the BLM’s illegal killing of cattle, as well as his unconstitutional stance against the Bundy Family, its property, residents and supporters. This has been covered extensively by Pete Santilli and his GMN team through various audio conversations and people close to the situation in Bunkerville. This is a side of the story that will undoubtedly continue to develop in weeks to come.

MORE INFO ON THAT STAND OFF:

(NaturalNews) Natural News has obtained and is now releasing a secret audio recording of a conversation that took place Thursday, April 10th, between Daniel P. Love, Special Agent in Charge of Region 3 of the BLM and Guerilla Media Network radio host Pete Santilli, serving in the role as a communications liaison between the armed citizen protesters and the BLM.

In this recording, you can hear Daniel Love and Pete Santilli discussing life-and-death confrontations, during which Santilli says Daniel Love and the Sheriff of the county will be arrested if they do not uphold their oath to the United States Constitution.

This audio gives us all a special look inside the twisted mind of BLM Special Agent Dan Love who functions as an agent of government tyranny operating in complete violation of the U.S. Constitution even while telling himself he's backed by the Constitution!

Background: The recording was made during a time when armed citizen protesters were only beginning to arrive, and BLM personnel at the time outnumbered armed citizens. (That situation reversed on Friday when armed citizens vastly outnumbered BLM.)

Click here to hear the audio recording (slightly edited for length, but nothing removed that's inherent to the conversation).

Recording transcript

Note: I typed this in myself (Mike Adams), late on a Saturday night, so I apologize for typos or errors. Doing my best to get this out ASAP for the sake of liberty in America...

The first voice you hear in this audio is of Pete Santilli asking, "Where's the cattle?"

The next voice, the lower voice is of Dan Love from BLM. Some of the highlights of the recording, transcribed (this transcript is EDITED for length and continuity, listen to the actual audio if you want every single word).

Santilli: "We want zero conflict. You know, confrontational, nose to nose..." And then later, "Are we going to be here screaming at you, and you're gonna be tasing, are you gonna do that type of confrontation. What we are trying to do is to completely de-escalate, 100%."

Santilli: "What we're going to ask for to de-escalate and to make sure we are not in confrontation with you... we want to let you know that we're going to come here and it's going to be non-negotiable what we believe in, and what we believe is the right thing to do."

Dan Love: "We have two federal court orders, and if you interfere, you will be arrested. If you impede and interfere, you will be taken into custody."

Santilli: "Tell DC Justice [Eric Holder] this is non-negotiable... but if you choose to go face to face and people get hurt, then we are going to hold you personally accountable."

Dan Love: "And I will hold you legally accountable. And I guarantee that the Constitution is on my side and not that side... Your Constitutions aren't decided on the dirt... you can fight that argument from jail."

Santilli: "It's not gonna be a fight, it's gonna be a non-negotiable terms, peacefully. If you bring violence..."

Dan Love: "If you interfere, if you impede, you will be arrested. I don't know how you plan on arresting me, but good luck with that."

Santilli: "There are gonna be some law enforcement officials who are gonna be going to jail."

Dan Love: "Yeah, don't do that. That's not gonna end well for ya. That doesn't happen. And again, I've seen your numbers right now, you'd better hope that 10,000 show up..."

Dan Love: "You're telling me you're gonna show up and arrest officers? That's not gonna happen, Mr. Santilli."

Santilli: "If anyone is unconstitutional, is not following to abide by their oath to the U.S. Constitution, they are going to be arrested including the Sheriff of this county."

Dan Love: "Okay, you start with him, go arrest Mr. Gillespie, and once you accomplish that you come back..."

Santilli: "He will be incarcerated if he fails to uphold his oath to the U.S. Constitution... he will go to jail."

Dan Love: "I'm telling you right now I'm putting YOU on warning as the messenger, if you violate, if you impede, if you interfere with two lawful court orders, you will be prosecuted, you will be arrested."

Santilli: "They are unlawful court orders.... I did not come here to do anything but to give you the opportunity to prevent a scenario where you're going to make a decision to cause harm to people."

Dan Love: "We're lawfully here! Do you see all these signs? You're in an enclosed area, you're on federal land..."

Santilli: "It's not federal land."

Dan Love: "It is federal land. I am positive."

Santilli: "I'll bet you lunch."

Dan Love: "Mr. Santilli, if you were right, I wouldn't have a job. So you know what? Be right. Get it changed, and then I'm happy not to wear this little gold shield..."

Santilli: "Do you know how dangerous it is for you to run around with a gun and a badge with what you just told me?... That you actually believe that you have the Constitution, and the law behind you, and the entitlement and you have a badge and a gun?"

Dan Love: "If you come unlawfully, to impede or interfere, you will be arrested. Non-negotiable."

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/044697_secret_audio_recording_bundy_ranch_blm_dan_love.html#ixzz30JWUZ1d6

IMAGE: Reid family crest (photo credit englishgathering.co.uk)
The Reid family bloodlineWhen discussing political and financial dynasties in America, it’s important to understand the power structure behind many family names, as it allows one to glean an overall picture of power and control that often stretches beyond US shores and throughout the world.

The Reid family bloodline is certainly no exception, and it’s interesting to note that Harry Reid has been aided throughout his political career by carefully utilizing the ‘rags to riches’ narrative regarding his upbringing. While he may have been brought up from humble beginnings, his family name is nonetheless deeply entrenched with that of the Rockefeller’s and elite society as a whole.

The New York Herald Tribune was owned by the Reid family, and several of their family members have been linked to the powerful secretive group called ‘The Pilgrims Society’. Notable family members include Whitelaw-Reid, Ogden Rodgers-Reid and Ogden Mills-Reid – all publishers and journalists of the well-known American media giant.

The Pilgrims Society has been considered by some as the transatlantic steering body which allow British elites and members of the Royal Family to direct developments in American politics and society, with a list of elite American and British members and patrons – and a membership strictly kept to white Anglo-Saxon protestants. It’s believed to be the backdoor by which European elites are able to wield an undo influence over American affairs.

In understanding some of the deep roots of American hereditary power, another connection that cannot be overlooked, are Pilgrims Society members, the Gould family, as they’ve seemingly played a role in supporting Reid Family enterprises through financial means, and consolidating family power through intermarriage. Throughout history and until today, we’ve seen this kind of family monopoly strategy in the US and Europe, as certain well-to-do families have married into one another. This could vary well be the case in Senator Harry Reid’s life as well, with his marriage to wife Landra Gould.

Not surprisingly, many Pilgrims members are in support of the United Nation’s sustainability projects and have undoubtedly played a role in the creation of the UN’s Agenda 21 sustainable land reform edict. No surprise then that both Edmund de Rothschild and David Rockefeller were listed as notable members of the Pilgrims Society – and during the Rio Earth Summit in 1992 they made their end-run push for the adoption of Agenda 21. The Pilgrims are also said to have heavily infiltrated the Council on Foreign Relations, and other clandestine steering committees and think-tanks.

The Pilgrims Society has also managed to gain influence and control over a chunk of the media operations in the United States and are said to have even had a hand in implementing the CIA’s notorious domestic propaganda program known as Operation Mockingbird through powerful Pilgrims-run media outlets like the New York Times and Time Magazine.

This secretive group has also been linked to the planned 1934 false flag coup on President Franklin D. Roosevelt through the American Liberty League, reportedly backed by many notable wealthy bankers. This concept was partially echoed in the John Frankenheimer feature film, Seven days of May, made in 1964, depicting a secretive plot to overthrow the president. Well respected stalwart and United States Marine Corps major general Smedley Butler alerted a congressional committee about a fascist scheme that was dubbed the Business Plot allegedly to overthrow Roosevelt.

IMAGE (left): ‘Here and everywhere’ - The Pilgrim Society is secretive group that is said to connect those in elite circles within Great Britain and the United States. Other secret groups like Skull & Bones, Quill & Dagger and Scroll & Key have been said to be many pilgrims. Its first meeting was at the Carlton Hotel on July 11th 1902, then called the Pilgrims of Great Britain (photo credit wikispooks.com)

As American dynasties go, so do their European counterparts, and the two even intermarry occasionally.

In the case of Reid Family Dynasty, an apparent stronghold has been developed in the state of Nevada, but could be in jeopardy should the Senator and his son’s shady influence pedaling and under the table dealing be given a proper investigation.

It’s safe to say the regular Americans would all be in agreement about just how dirty and corrupt political life has become in Washington DC, and that the insider trading culture is now a clear and present danger – and now poses a direct threat, to the integrity of the US Constitutional Republic.:

MORE FROM JUDGE JEANINE

The story that I’m about to tell you starts with Dirty Harry’s long-time senior aide, his puppet on a string, with virtually no experience at the Bureau of Land Management, who now runs it.
That bureau today eyeing 116 miles on the border between Texas and Oklahoma, an estimated 90,000 acres that BLM says belongs to the public. So, what’s behind these land grabs? Are they really about protected animals, like tortoises and owls? Or might Dirty Harry be up to something more sinister?
Now, the state of Nevada is essentially desert. For years, Dirty Harry introduced bills transferring federal land to county commissioners to sell to profiteers building homes and shopping malls, not giving a damn about the tortoises, routinely killing them. All sanctioned by BLM. Tortoises be damned.
Now, fast-forward, a new found concern for the tortoise. How dare the cattle graze where the tortoise should roam?
So, Harry Reid, so incensed that armed military type agents come in like storm troopers. The BLM, with no police authority, comes in like military paratroopers to move some cows? You need snipers to move cows, Harry? Really?
And then miraculously, you back off for so called “safety reasons.” So, Harry, why did your guys show up armed to the teeth like they were about to fight al Qaeda if you were so concerned about safety?

Judge Jeanine continues her connecting of Harry’s dirty dealings by explaining why, in her opinion, the Obama BLM backed off of their invasion of the Bundy Ranch, and it has nothing to do with safety.
In attempting to paint Cliven Bundy as a deadbeat, many a liberal pundit, and Harry Reid himself, have claimed that the raid at the Bundy Ranch was only in relation to grazing fees that Bundy owes the government. But, Judge Jeanine demonstrates that the grazing fees are just a handy excuse.

Folks, a little primer here. If a developer wants to build a mall or a solar energy complex where protected species live, they have to find a “mitigation area” to move the protected species there, in this case, the tortoise. Bottom line, building where there is a protected animal requires that you move that animal somewhere else where it can survive.
So, folks, this is bigger than Bundy, whose comments recently, by the way, were outrageous. But, it’s bigger than him. And, herein lies the rub.
Dirty Harry’s son-in-law (she meant is son, Rory Reid) is in a firm that represents a Chinese company that wants to develop the largest solar energy complex in America in, guess where? Nevada. On land occupied by the tortoise. On land that Harry Reid’s son helped locate for the Chinese and helped them purchase at well below market value. Appraisal? Between $28 and $36 million. Purchase price? $4.5 million.
Now, Dirty Harry himself is pals with the owner of that Chinese company, energy tycoon Wang Yu So, who hosted Dirty Harry in China and who Harry featured at one of his events. How to seal the deal? Get rid of those pesky tortoises. Query? Where should the Chinese put the tortoise? Harry and his puppet have an answer. Harry proposes a mitigation area.
The BLM, Bureau of Land Management, actually posts documents on its website designating the mitigation area so that the solar power project can move forward. Unfortunately, that designated mitigation area has cattle on it. So, at first blush, everyone said, “No, this land grab has nothing to do with Harry’s solar energy plant because that was going to be 50 miles away.” But, folks, it has everything to do with the land grab. The land where the cattle grazed was the mitigation area that BLM posted so that the solar power project over here could go forward. BINGO!
In true Dirty Harry mode, you move the cows so we can move the tortoises there, so that Harry’s pal and the Chinese clients of Harry’s son can build the solar energy plant.
Guess what? The BLM deleted the document that was entitled “Cattle Trespass Impact Solar Development.” A little too incriminating you think, Harry?

Harry Reid has been is no stranger to dirty land deals. He has been accused of abusing his position in Congress to profit on numerous occasions. Not missing one piece of the puzzle in the corruption surrounding Harry Reid, Judge Jeanine calls him out for his abuse of power. According to Judge Jeanine, the only safety that Reid was concerned about was that of his reputation.

You know, it’s no surprise that people who represent us in Congress are more concerned with lining their own pockets and the pockets of their family members than they are of representing us. Dirty Harry’s arrogance, his condescension, and his name-calling is only surpassed by his chutzpah.
Now, Dirty Harry came into Congress with $1.8 million. He made a few hundred thousands of dollars a year. And then reports a net worth of more than $10 million. Harry, here’s what I think.
The questions were getting a little too close for comfort, so you called off your paramilitary raid on the cows using “safety” as an excuse. But, safety had nothing to do with it. Unless, of course, you’re talking about the ‘safety’ of your reputation.

It’s easy for Reid to stand before reporters or even on the floor of the Senate and lie. He faces no repercussions and is rarely even questioned about his claims. He lies with ease because he benefits from these lies. If Judge Jeanine had her way, Reid would be on the witness stand with her as the prosecutor.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

OBAMACARE.. OBAMA LIAR... OBAMA CHEAT OBAMA FRAUD

The full scale of the ObamaCare launch disaster is revealed

Sunday, May 18, 2014

WIRELESS CHAT ROOMS. START TESTING THIS OUT IN YOUR AREA. PATRIOTS THIS APP COULD LET US CONTACT EACH OTHER WHEN OBAMA USES THE INTERNET "KILL SWITCH" AGAINST THE REVOLUTION!