BIDEN THE GREAT WHITE DOPE

BIDEN THE GREAT WHITE DOPE

Obama unleashes Joe Biden, the “Idiot in Waiting”!

Posted on March 16, 2012 by The Compassionate Conservative

Why Obama is unleashing Joe Biden on 2012 campaign trail

Vice president Joe Biden spoke to auto industry workers in Ohio Thursday about the auto bailout. Biden speaks to working-class American voters, say analysts, in a race that could be between two Harvard-trained presidential candidates – Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.
By Andy Sullivan, Reuters / March 15, 2012

• 

Vice President Joe Biden reacts to a fan prior to speaking at a union hall in Toledo, Ohio, Thursday March 15, 2012.

TOLEDO, OHIO

In a presidential election that could feature two Harvard-trained candidates not known for their common touch, President Barack Obama‘s campaign deployed a new weapon on Thursday: Vice President Joe Biden.
With a tough re-election fight looming in November, Obama campaign officials hope Biden’s back-slapping demeanor and humble origins will help win the support of blue collar voters.
Though Obama did not win the white working class vote in 2008, he will have to hold losses to a manageable level in order to win industrial Midwestern states likeOhio that will be crucial battlegrounds in the fall, analysts say.
RELATED: How well do you know the 44th US President? Take the quiz
Biden flew to this battered industrial city to celebrate the revival of the Us auto industry and criticized the Republican presidential candidates who say the government should not have stepped in to help it.
He had another message for the auto workers who have seen factories go dark and neighborhoods empty out: I understand what you are going through.
“As a kid I saw my dad trapped in a city where all the good jobs were gone,” Biden said, referring to his childhood in the faded industrial town of Scranton, Pennsylvania.
The election is likely to turn on the state of the economy and the Obama administration sees the auto bailout as one of its best chances to convince voters that the deepest recession since the 1930s could have been much worse.
For Obama, the auto industry bailout is a chance to win back working-class white voters who have abandoned the party in droves over the past decades.
Obama won in 2008 thanks to a coalition of minorities, young people and college-educated white voters. In Ohio, he lost the white working-class vote by 10 percentage points even as he carried the state.
But those voters can still swing an election, as Obama’s fellow Democrats found out in the 2010 midterm elections when strong support from seniors and working class voters helped Republicanswin control of the House of Representatives.
Obama will need to limit his losses among this group in order to win Ohio and other Rust Belt states, according to an analysis by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank.
He could catch a break if front-runner Mitt Romney secures the Republican nomination. Romney, a former private equity executive worth as much as $250 million, has struggled to win working-class voters as he battles Rick Santorum, a former U.S. senator, and Newt Gingrich, former U.S. House speaker, in the state-by-state Republican nominating contest.
A number of gaffes – such as challenging a rival to a $10,000 bet and stating that “I like firing people” – has given critics ammunition to argue that he is out of touch with ordinary voters.
TCC: WAKE UP AMERICA! NO ONE is as out of touch with AMERICA as Obama and his Socialist Administration, PERIOD!

O is for Outsourcing...Obama is a FREAKING TWO FACED LYING SACK OF KENYAN SHIT

O is for Outsourcing...Obama is a FREAKING TWO FACED LYING SACK OF KENYAN SHIT!!

Obama campaign bashes Romney for Bain offshoring, employs call center in Canada

BY:By  Bill McMorris - June 26, 2012 2:07 pm

The Obama campaign spent nearly $4,700 on telemarketing services from Pacific East between March and June, a Washington Free Beacon study of federal election filings shows.

a Canadian telemarketing company called

Pacific East is not the only foreign telemarketing firm raking in cash from the president’s reelection campaign. Obama paid a call center in Manila, Philippines $78,314.10 for telemarketing services between the start of the campaign and March.

Pacific East is headquartered in British Columbia, Canada, though the campaign issued more than a dozen checks to a P.O. box located in Washington State—about 1,000 feet from the Canadian border and 9 miles from its headquarters in Canada.

Neither Obama for America nor Pacific East returned requests for comment.

Obama has blasted Republican nominee Mitt Romney as an “outsourcer in chief” after the Washington Post published a story Friday about his private equity firm’s role in outsourcing factory jobs overseas. Vice President Joe Biden blasted Romney Tuesday as a “true believer” in outsourcing while stumping in the former governor’s native Michigan.

Some of Obama’s biggest supporters have endorsed outsourcing as necessary to a healthy world economy. Psycho-historian Paul Krugman, who pens the New York Times blog “Conscience of a Liberal,” is a stalwart defender of outsourcing. In the run up to the 2004 election, he criticized Democratic leaders, including New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, for criticizing the Bush administration on outsourcing.

“Outsourcing is less than a threat than is widely perceived,” Krugman said in an interview with The Left Coaster. “The reason it seems so bad right now is we have a generally weak economy and generally poor employment. If that were improved, then we’d have a very different perspective on it and it would require pretty modest steps.”

Obama’s outsourcing was not limited to telemarketing. The Daily Caller reports that Obama also booked flights through corporate travel company Egencia’s Bellevue, Washington office. Egencia maintains a large presence in southeast Asia, including call centers in India and China.

"UNITED SOCIALIST STATES OF AMERIQUA"...

RIGHT UNDER OUR COLLECTIVE NOSES..... OBAMA AND THE LEFTY CABAL ARE SETTING UP FOR THE FINAL REVEAL !!! ...TADAAAA!!!..... JANUARY 2013...

"UNITED SOCIALIST STATES OF AMERIQUA"...  

where will you be ???

Obama Quietly Gives Himself Power to Seize Internet

Wednesday, 11 Jul 2012 08:29 PM

By Todd Beamon

Another late-Friday afternoon release from the White House — this one on how agencies should communicate with the public in emergencies — has Internet privacy advocates crying foul over a possible power grab.

The executive order — “Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions” — was released last Friday in the late afternoon. The Friday before, the White House issued data showing that its payroll had increased 14.1 percent over the last year of the Bush administration.

President Barack Obama’s new order outlines procedures for government agencies to follow in preparing plans so they can communicate with “the public, allies, and other nations” should a national crisis occur, CNBC reports.

Editor's Note: Will Obama Be Defeated? Vote Here!

Essentially, it says the government can take control of private telecommunications technology, presumably including those used for the Internet, for government communications in an emergency.

“Under the Executive Order the White House has … granted the Department [of Homeland Security] the authority to seize private facilities when necessary, effectively shutting down or limiting civilian communications,” wrote the Electronic Privacy Information Center in a blog post.

This is what has Internet privacy advocates worried. They say the document represents a power grab on behalf of the federal government, CNBC reports.

They’re particularly concerned about language like this, from section 5.2(e): “The Secretary of Homeland Security shall … satisfy priority communications requirements through the use of commercial, Government, and privately owned communications resources, when appropriate.”

But White House officials told CNBC that the order does nothing more than update existing authority dating from a 1984 executive order signed by Ronald Reagan to reflect modern communications technology.

No new expansions of authority come in the order, they said, and the measure just directs agencies to develop plans for the government should they need to communicate with the public during a natural emergency like a nuclear attack or terrorist strike.

“The Internet is an international network of networks; no one person, organization or country can control or shut down the Internet,” a government official wrote in an email to CNBC.

“The United States relies on the Internet to perform essential functions including to operate critical infrastructure and to maintain essential national security capabilities. That is why the President has designated our digital infrastructure as a strategic national asset.

“This Order is about communications resilience — the Administration’s goal is to maintain this connected environment during the worst disasters, even in circumstances when our adversaries may wish to deprive us of their use,” the email said.

But that did not satisfy everyone. The Daily Caller that the federal government already has its own emergency communications network, the National Communications System, which allows members of the federal government to make use of private carriers during the event of a disaster.

And the blog ExtremeTech asked, "If there’s a possible terrorist threat, is that grounds for locking down the US cellular carriers? If Iran attacks the US with a Stuxnet-like virus, is that grounds for the disabling of core internet routers?"

Thomas Sowell: The real 'war on women' & American Crossroads: "Obama's War on Women"

Thomas Sowell: The real 'war on women

By THOMAS SOWELL

Syndicated columnist

opinion@ocregister.com

REPUBLICAN Congressman tells Conservative Activists that fighting for the Constitut...

Republican Congressman tells Conservative Activists that fighting for the Constitution is a loosing battle? Watch the fireworks as Unite In Action's Director of Legal Affairs KrisAnne Hall and 912 Project National Co-Chair, Unite In Action President, Stephani Scruggs respond.

Obamacare Headlines Are GROSSLY Misleading... A GREAT READ

 A GREAT READ !!!

Today’s Obamacare Headlines Are GROSSLY Misleading By Craig Andresen on July 12, 2012 at 7:36 am

Yesterday, in the House, yet another vote to repeal Obamacare was held. It was the 33rd time such a vote was taken in the House since the passage of the bill nobody could know what was in until they passed it.

33 times in the house.
How many times has this been debated in the Senate?
Zero.
That’s because Harry Reid, just as he’s done with 30 some odd jobs bills passed in the House and all the various budgets passed in the House…Refuses to allow them to see the light of day in the Senate.
Liberals and socialists love to tell you that it’s the republicans obstructing congress or doing nothing in congress but, they’re lying.
The headlines today will read something to the effect of, “REPUBLICANS VOTE FOR OBAMACARE REPEALED…AGAIN” or…”REPUBLICANS PLAY POLITICS WITH BILL DEEMED CONSTITUTIONAL BY SUPREME COURT” or…”REPUBLICANS PASS SYMBOLIC VOTE INSTEAD OF DEALING WITH JOBS.”
There will be a great many variations of the headlines but, essentially, they’ll be talking about republicans voting for repeal and getting nowhere doing it.
That, however, should NOT be the headline.
HERE’S what the headline SHOULD be:

185 HOUSE LIBERALS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY – SENATE LIBERALS TO AFFIRM LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY BY NOT VOTING AT ALL!!!

THAT is what REALLY took place yesterday.
Obamacare IS a tax bill…So sayeth the United States Supreme Court. Were it anything BUT a tax bill, it would NOT have been found Constitutional…SO SAYETH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
To ALL conservatives running for seats in the House and to ALL conservatives running for a seat in the Senate…MAKE THE LIBERAL/SOCIALISTS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE OWN YESTERDAY’S VOTE!!!
If you are running for anything from the village DOG CATCHER to the WHITE HOUSE and you are a republican…what took place yesterday IS your platform!!!
At a time when the economy is stagnant, when unemployment hovers at 8.2 percent, when consumer confidence is down, while small business confidence is at its lowest point since Obama became the Emperor, when food stamp use is at its highest point and while our national debt is soaring to never before imagined levels…
185 HOUSE LIBERALS IN THE HOUSE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY AND LIBERALS IN THE SENATE WILL JOIN THEM BY REFUSING TO VOTE ON IT AT ALL.
THAT is a STUNNING reality but it’s not the ONLY reality.
YOU CAN ADD TO THAT THE FACT THAT OBAMA AND THE LIBERAL/SOCIALISTS IN CONGRESS ALSO WANT TO HIKE TAXES ON THOSE MOST LIKELY TO SPUR BUSINESS GROWTH AND PROVIDE HIRING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THOSE 8.2 % OF THE POPULATION “OFFICIALLY” UNEMPLOYED.
Here are some OTHER factual headlines you’ll never see anywhere but in The National Patriot…
“OBAMA WATERS DOWN JOB MARKET FOR AMERICANS BY DUMPING MORE THAN 800,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS INTO THE POOL!!!”
“ OBAMA WANTS TO EXTEND TAX BREAKS FOR 98% OF AMERICANS FOR ONLY 1 MORE YEAR AND THEN…KATY BAR THE DOOR…HE’LL JACK UP THEIR RATES TOO!!!”
“LIBERALS TO HIRE 16,500 NEW IRS AGENTS TO ENFORCE BILL THEY CLAIM IS NOT A TAX!!!”
“3^RD CITY IN THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA RUNS OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY, DECLARES BANKRUPTCY!!!”
“OBAMA PANDERS TO BLUE COLLAR WORKERS IN CLEVELAND – HOURS LATER, ATTENDS $40,000 PER PLATE NY FUNDRAISER WITH HOLLYWOOD ELITES!!!”
“DEBBIE WASSERMAN SHULTZ ATTACKS ROMNEY’S SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS WHILE IGNORING HER OWN!!!”
“PARTY WHO VOTED AGAINST EMANCIPATION AND IN FAVOR OF JIM CROW LAWS CALLS PARTY WHO WON ENAMCIPATION AND FOUGHT AGAINST JIM CROW LAWS RACISTS!!!”
“OBAMA COVERS FOR FAST AND FURIOUS GUNS TO MEXICAN DRUG LORDS – NOW WANTS TO CEDE YOUR 2^ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO U.N. AND IRAN!!!”
“ERIC HOLDER SAYS NO TO TEXAS VOTER ID LAW YET INSISTS PRESS SHOW VALID ID TO COVER HIS EVENT IN TEXAS!!!”
“LIBERALS WHO CLAIM SHOWING A VALID ID TO VOTE IS RACIST WILL REQUIRE EVERYONE TO HAVE AN OBAMACARE ID CARD!!!”
“DHS SECRETARY WHO SAYS SOUTHERN BORDER IS SAFER NOW THAN EVER BEFORE WILL NO LONGER SUPPORT ARIZONA LAW ENFORCEMENT OR EXISTING IMMIGRATION LAWS THERE!!!”
“BLACK AG, ERIC HOLDER, CLAIMS VOTER ID LAWS ARE RACIST AND SAYS IN PERSON VOTER FRAUD NONEXISTENT WHILE WHITE CONSERVATIVE REGISTERS TO VOTE AS…AG ERIC HOLDER!!!”
“OBAMA HIRES JOB CREATION ADVISER WHO SENT ENTIRE GE DIVISION TO CHINA THEN CALLS ROMNEY AN OUTSOURCER!!!”
“BIDEN DEMANDS TO SEE ROMNEY’S TAX “PAPERS” BUT FAILS TO DEMAND TO SEE OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE, SOCIAL SECURITY, SELECTIVE SERVICE OR COLLEGE “PAPERS!!!”
“OBAMA SAYS CONSTITUTION AND LAWS ON THE BOOKS PREVENT HIM FROM ENACTING DREAM ACT ON HIS OWN THEN, ENACTS DREAM ACT ON HIS OWN!!!”
These are but a smattering of factual headlines which SHOULD have been seen in print over the last 3 ½ years but have never been written.
We all know that far TOO many people ONLY read headlines and never read the articles. Of those who READ the articles, few bother to investigate them on their own. In today’s 24 hour news cycle and Twitter age, people tend to get their news in 140 characters or less and think they have the full story.
It’s all they need to know or, so they think.
A perfect example of the situation is the FACT that those who relied ONLY on NBC for their news, had NO idea of the Fast and Furious scandal UNTIL…the day Holder was found in contempt because, up to that moment, through more than a year and a half of congressional hearings, subpoenas, investigations and even the death of Agent Brian Terry, NBC had devoted exactly 15 seconds to the story.
So…Today, when you see or hear a headline stating that Obamacare was repealed in the house but it won’t mean a thing because the Senate will not take it up at all…Know the REAL headline…

185 HOUSE LIBERALS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY – SENATE LIBERALS TO AFFIRM LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN U.S. HISTORY BY NOT VOTING AT ALL!!!

George Soros-Backed SuperPAC Targeting Allen West Confidential Memo Leaked

Soros-Backed SuperPAC Targeting Allen West Confidential Memo Leaked

July 11, 2012 | Filed under: Allen West | Posted by: Javier Manjarres

By Javier Manjarres
By Javier Manjarres

The ‘Dump West’ Super PAC, backed by George Soros himself, is taking aim at Conservative Congressman Allen West. As we reported earlier, a “top national Democrat operative has been retained by a new George Soros-backed super-PAC to target Congressman Allen West for defeat this November.”

 The Super PAC has been christened “Dump West” and is expected to file with the Federal Election Commission early next week.  Sources have told The Shark Tank that a website along with a targeted web advertising campaign will soon be launched.  Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi asked former Congressman Larry Smith, who’s now working as a lobbyist, to help line up initial funding for the group. West is said to be at the top of Pelosi’s hit list.

 Sources have also us that left wing billionaire George Soros is among those who committed to a $5 million war chest to defeat West. “It’s not surprising that the hard Left is seeking to beat West”  said Florida Tea Party leader Eric Von Tausch “West’s a conservative hero.”-(Source-Soros SuperPAC)

 Our source has confirmed that the PAC will indeed file early next week, most probably on Tuesday, and hope to immediately start fundraising.
Now the Shark Tank has obtained the actual ‘Confidential Memorandum” that was circulated among “Interested Parties.

Here is the Memo


DONATE TO ALLEN WEST CAMPAIGN:

https://www.allenwestforcongress.com/contribute/

COME ON ROMNEY LIGHT OUR FIRES... Palin to Romney: 'Light Our Hair on Fire'

Palin to Romney: 'Light Our Hair on Fire'

Wednesday, 11 Jul 2012 07:52 AM

By Greg McDonald

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says Mitt Romney has the right message on the economy to win the White House this year, but needs to do a better job of connecting with independents and the party’s “base supporters,” who want the presumptive GOP nominee to “light our hair on fire.”

“He’s already got the right message,” the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee told Fox News’ Sean Hannity Tuesday.

But Palin added, “There are a lot of his base supporters — independents — who are saying, well, light our hair on fire, then! Remind us how important it is that we get engaged in the presidential election because it is the election of our lifetime.”

The Fox News contributor encouraged the former Massachusetts governor to be more “courageous and bold and passionate” in presenting his case, a point that many GOP and conservative leaders have been making over the past couple of weeks.

Palin also ventured a guess on what Romney is looking for in a vice presidential running mate.

Recalling her own controversial ride in the 2008 campaign as Republican nominee John McCain’s partner, Palin said, “I think Gov. Romney will probably play it safe, relatively speaking, in terms of finding someone who is a known commodity — so that the media doesn’t do what the media did to me.”

© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

WE HAVE THE NUMBERS!!!

DHS continues to target conservatives and ignore Islamists

"Groups that believe that one's personal and/or national 'way of life' is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent." describes potential terrorists? WTH? DHS is using left wing hate groups and even Islamic groups with ties to terrorism as consultants to determine who are threats.

From a Jan, 2011 article "How Dept. of Homeland Security identifies 'right wing extremists':

The radical leftist group Southern Poverty Law Center has partnered with the Department of Homeland Security in a 'Working Group' called Countering violent Extremism to paint conservatives as hate groups and extremists.
...

Former Attorney General Edwin Meese says it is "despicable" for the Southern Poverty Law Center to classify the Family Research Council and a dozen other top conservative organizations as "hate groups" similar to the Ku Klux Klan.

The SPLC has a history of targeting conservatives and conservative groups as racist, homophobic, or extremist if they disagree with the radical left positions of the SPLC on any number of issues. An article at Discover the Networks.org says "What makes the Southern Poverty Law Center particularly odious is its habit of taking legitimate conservatives and jumbling them with genuine hate groups (the Klan, Aryan Nation, skinheads, etc.), to make it appear that there's a logical relationship between say opposing affirmative action and lynching, or demands for an end to government services for illegal aliens and attacks on dark-skinned immigrants. The late novelist/philosopher Ayn Rand called this "the broad-brush smear.""

.....
The SPLC has joined the Department of Homeland Security in a 'Working Group' called Countering violent Extremism. John Cohen, President and CEO of SPLC is listed as a member and Laurie Wood, Analyst, Southern Poverty Law Center/Instructor, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center is listed as an 'expert in subject matter'. The members of the group also include three from Muslim organizations but we don't see any conservatives. (see the list at the end of the report)

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) which has been determined by the courts to be a terrorist support group proudly points out on their Facebook page that its Michigan members 'participated a Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Working Group meeting with law enforcement officials and community advocates in Dearborn, Mich.'[ibid].

So we have the Southern Poverty Law Center, also known as The Church of Morris Dees, which calls groups and individuals like the Family Research Council, Eagle Forum, the Heritage Foundation, Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Rep. Steve King (R-IA), and Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) 'right wing extremists' and the Council on American-Islamic Relations which the FBI has proven to be linked to a terrorist organization teaming up with the US Department of Homeland Security to determine what groups in America should be categorized as 'extremist' and potentially violent.
Now you can see why the DHS came out with its Rightwing Extremism report in April of 2009 that warned of potential violence by people against illegal immigration and gun control, and returning military veterans. Now that's change.

Obama issues Executive Order that gives him control of the internet! Its coming People...

OBAMA issues Executive Order that gives him control of the internet

• By Sebastian Anthony
  
  REFUSE TO COMPLY..... OR SOON WE ARE DONE AS A REPUBLIC.
  
  
  • By Sebastian Anthony on July 10, 2012 at
  Without even the faintest toot of a fanfare, President Barack Obama has issued an Executive Order that outlines an extreme level of communications preparedness in case of crisis or emergency, including the ability to take over any communication network, including the internet.

  The Order, “Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions,” takes many of the US government’s existing emergency communications preparations, and codifies the exact responsibilities of the various US secretaries/departments and intelligence agencies. For the most part, the Order is very sensible; basically, no matter what — come hurricanes, earthquakes, or nuclear war — the US government “must have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions.”
  To this end, the Order instructs the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (DOSTP) to issue an annual report detailing any changes that should be made to the national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) communications programs, capabilities, and policies. The DOSTP must also ensure that he has up-to-date information about the readiness of NS/EP systems, and advise the President on other matters, such as radio spectrum prioritization. The Order also outlines responsibilities for the Secretary of Defense, and other officials.
  When we get to Section 5.2, however, there’s this interesting tidbit: “The Secretary of Homeland Security shall: … satisfy priority communications requirements through the use of commercial, Government, and privately owned communications resources, when appropriate.” In short, while it’s stressed that the government must have its own secure networks in place, the Executive Office reserves the right to do whatever it likes with commercial and private networks, in times of emergency or crisis. I’m not an expert on US law, or Executive Orders, so I will go easy on the possible interpretations or implications of Section 5.2 — but I would guess that this will mostly come down to how easily the President and his Executive Office can declare a state of emergency or crisis. If there’s a possible terrorist threat, is that grounds for locking down the US cellular carriers? If Iran attacks the US with a Stuxnet-like virus, is that grounds for the disabling of core internet routers?
  It’s also worth noting that the US President has, since the Communications Act of 1934, the power to “suspend or amend… the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of emitting electromagnetic radiations within the jurisdiction of the United States” — i.e. Obama already has an internet kill switch (as did Bush and every other president since Hoover). The last few years have seen some proposed bills that would give the US government more control over the internet, ostensibly in the name of improved cybersecurity, but so far none of these bills have passed into law.
  While Congress’s attempt to introduce improved cybersecurity measures has generally been received by the press as an attempt to curtail our internet liberties, the fact remains that cybersecurity will become an actual threat to our glorious country at some point. Cyberwarfare is undeniably in our midst; when so much can be achieved without political posturing or scrambling jets, countries would be crazy to not launch cyber attacks. It will be interesting to see how the President and Congress eventually deal with these threats, without stepping on the ACLU’s toes. As always, it will probably take a massive disaster or attack to pass a bill.
  Another interesting point, I think, is the implementation. In the case of Section 5.2, the President assumes that the Secretary of Homeland Security can basically just… take over a private or commercial network. How does she do this? Can she demand that Verizon installs a core router in the White House bunker? Can she jump in a limo, head over to Verizon HQ, and announce to everyone that she’s now in charge?
  

  In the case of a kill switch, it would require some 8,000 US ISPs (yes, there are that many) to comply with the President, or to attach their core infrastructure to a remotely-accessible power switch. The other option, of course, would be for the ISPs to install a physical switch at the White House, where, in case of emergency or crisis, the President could shut down the internet by gleefully mashing dozens of buttons at a time with his big hands. Thinking about it, he would probably get a special mallet made for the occasion.
  
  

Survey: 83% of Doctors Considered Quitting Over Obamacare

SHARE PLEASE:
SO HUSSEIN....WILL WITCH DOCTORS FROM AFRICA FILL THE POSITIONS??? ARE YOU KIDDING ME ?? THIS IS FREAKING BULLSHIT!

PATRIOTS WE MUST ACT NOW !! END THIS REGIME!>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Survey: 83% of Doctors Considered Quitting Over Obamacare
Eighty-three percent of American physicians have considered leaving the profession over President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform law – and 63 percent have called for repealing all or part of it, according to a survey by the Doctor Patient Medical Association.

The results from the non-partisan association of doctors and patients, founded last fall and headquartered in Alexandria, Va., is based on a national survey of 699 physicians, the Daily Caller reports.

The Affordable Care Act was upheld last month by the U.S. Supreme Court.
By 2020, the U.S. is expected to face a shortage of at least 90,000 doctors. Because the new healthcare law expands insurance coverage, it will increase physician demand.

“Hands down, doctors blame government involvement for the current problems in medicine, and are not shy to say they want it out,” the association says in a report on the survey findings.

“The reasons cited range from the deluge of regulatory compliance that siphons time away from patient care, to de facto rationing achieved through complex payment schemes, to cushy relationships that favor corporations and special interests in medicine.”

The DPMA found that many doctors just don't believe the legislation will give more Americans quality care, co-founder of the DPMA Kathryn Serkes said.

“Doctors clearly understand what Washington does not — that a piece of paper that says you are ‘covered’ by insurance or ‘enrolled’ in Medicare or Medicaid does not translate to actual medical care when doctors can’t afford to see patients at the lowball payments, and patients have to jump through government and insurance company bureaucratic hoops,” she said

As for Obamacare specifically, the association said: “Doctors say that a key government provision in the Affordable Care Act, the huge expansion of Medicaid enrollees, is likely to backfire, as 49 percent say they will stop accepting Medicaid payments.”


Read more on Newsmax.com: Survey: 83% of Doctors Considered Quitting Over Obamacare

Brad Pitt's mom in fear after slamming Obama ..IF THE LEFT DOES IT... WHY ARE WE SO WEAK ?? WE MUST DO THE SAME WHEN THEY SPEAK OUT AGAINST OUR VALUES! ... Brad Pitt’s mom in fear after slamming Obama!!

WND EXCLUSIVE

Brad Pitt's mom in fear after slamming Obama

Welcome to the Death Camp of Tolerance.
Jane Pitt is the mother of actor Brad Pitt. On Tuesday, the Springfield News-Leader published her letter in support of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Via Life News:

Any Christian who does not vote or writes in a name is casting a vote for Romney’s opponent, Barack Hussein Obama — a man who sat in Jeremiah Wright’s church for years, did not hold a public ceremony to mark the National Day of Prayer, and is a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage.

Gasp! A pro-life Christian who doesn’t support gay marriage? Time for the Left’s self-proclaimed arbiters of tolerance to teach her a lesson with their hateful, misogynist slurs and death wishes.

THIS IS WHAT THE LEFT POSTED ABOUT HER!!

I HATE BILL MAHER: Bill Maher Likes His Black Men Violent and His Black Women Prostitutes

Wayne Brady: Bill Maher Likes His Black Men Violent and His Black Women Prostitutes

The entertainer responds to the HBO host's racist insult with a devastating rebuttal.

Bill Maher, possibly the whitest guy on the planet, believes he’s the reigning authority on what blackness means. While pontificating on the personality of the president, he wished Obama were more like Suge Knight, gangster thug and criminal, and less like Wayne Brady, successful, law-abiding entertainer. For those of you unfamiliar with the gangster rap world, Knight was guilty of many crimes, including theft, assault, and weapons charges. For more on him, just read his Wikipedia entry to be thoroughly disgusted.
Maher clearly believes a person can’t be truly considered black unless he has a criminal record. Wayne Brady, who worked incredibly hard to become successful, is just not black enough in Maher’s eyes because he never beat anyone up…yet. It looks like Maher might not want to encounter Brady without a bodyguard after his insult. Brady responded to Maher on a Girl on Guy podcast with Aisha Tyler:

So, that means it’s a diss to Obama to be called me because he wants a brother-brother, or what he perceives. Just because you f*** black hookers, just because you have that particular black experience. … Now, I’m not saying I’m Billy Badass, but if Bill Maher has his perception of what’s black wrapped up, I would gladly slap the shit out of Bill Maher in the middle of the street, and then I want to see what Bill Maher would do.

Maher is a known misogynist, calling conservative women all manner of horrible names that aren’t fit for print, but Brady’s accusation that Maher likes black prostitutes is more than just speculation. Maher had a famous relationship with rap video girl and porn star Karrine Steffans, who became famous for writing a tell-all novel about the rap world and her experience as a “whore” for rappers (her words). Steffans, a victim of abuse from childhood and from her choices as an adult, didn’t fare better under Maher, who loves to call conservatives racists. Steffans spilled the beans in an issue of Vibe magazine as reported by the New York Post:

Bill wants someone he can put down in an argument, tell you how ghetto you are, how big your butt is, and that you’re an idiot. That’s why you never see him with a white girl or an intellectual. I might as well have been a Muslim woman with my head wrapped, walking 10 paces behind my man. [But] I couldn’t be “Bill Maher’s girlfriend” any more – not when I’m Karrine Steffans . . . best-selling author.

Not at all shocking.


MORE DETAILS VISIST: http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2012/07/07/bill-maher-likes-his-black-men-violent-and-his-black-women-prostitutes/?singlepage=true

IN SEPTEMBER ...SMALL BUSINESSES NEED TO GO ON STRIKE....To flex our muscle with this Administration:

FLEX OUR SMALL BUSINESS MUSCLES!!!
EVERY SMALL BUSINESS SHOULD HOLD A MEETING WITH ITS EMPLOYEES AND EXPLAIN THAT WITH BUSINESS BEING TIGHT AND ALL.... YOU ARE GOING TO LAY OFF ONE EMPLOYEE THIS SEPTEMBER...THANKS TO OBAMA'S ANTI BUSINESS POLICIES:...

Obama Invites Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood ...Anti Israel....Islamist Leader to US. Ofcourse he does. Muslims are his Brothers.

Obama Invites Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood ...Anti Israel....Islamist Leader to US. Of course he does. Muslims are his Brothers. 

Sunday, 08 Jul 2012 06:26 PM

 

Barack Obama has invited Egypt's newly elected Islamist president, Mohammed Morsi, to visit the United States in September, an Egyptian official said on Sunday, reflecting the new ties Washington is cultivating with the region's Islamists.
Washington, long wary of Islamists and an ally of ousted President Hosni Mubarak, shifted policy last year to open formal contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood, the group behind Morsi's win. Morsi formally resigned from the group after his victory.
Morsi's success at the polls mirrors the rising influence of Islamists in countries across the Middle East and North Africa in the wake of revolts and protests against autocratic rulers who have led the region for decades.
"President Obama extended an invitation to President Morsi to visit the United States when he attends the U.N. General Assembly in September," Egyptian aide Yasser Ali said after Morsi met U.S. Deputy Secretary of State William Burns in Cairo.
Burns, who did not mention the invitation at a news conference earlier, pledged U.S. support for Egypt's battered economy and said he welcomed Morsi's promise to uphold international treaties, which include a peace deal with Israel.
"We have taken careful note and appreciated President Morsi's public statements about a commitment to international obligations and we certainly attach great importance to Egypt's continuing role as a force for peace," Burns said.
Israel has watched with growing concern the political gains of the Brotherhood, an inspiration for the Palestinian militant group Hamas. The 84-year-old Brotherhood renounced violence as a means to achieve political change in Egypt decades ago.
Analysts say that one way the United States could influence the direction of policy in Egypt, a nation at the heart of Washington's regional policy since a peace treaty was signed with Israel in 1979, would be through economic support.
Washington provides $1.3 billion a year in military aid as well as other assistance and could help mobilise other donors, lenders and investors. Those could prove vital as Egypt tries to stave off a balance of payments and budget crisis.
"The United States is firmly committed to doing everything that we can to support Egypt's economic revival. We understand the challenges that lie ahead and also the president does," Burns told reporters after his two-hour meeting with Morsi.
Burns, whose trip precedes a visit to Egypt on July 14 by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said he had discussed a $3.2 billion loan package that Cairo has been negotiating with the International Monetary Fund.
"We talked in general terms about the value of moving ahead with the IMF in the interest of Egypt, trying to work out an equitable agreement that addresses Egypt's concerns and needs," he said.
He said the IMF package "can produce not only much needed resources but also sends an important positive signal to investors and donors and Egyptians as they move ahead on economic revival."
© 2012 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.


Read more on Newsmax.com: Obama Invites Egypt's Islamist Leader to US

Obama Pledge: I Will Raise Taxes on the Rich... WHO ARE THE RICH ?? Businesses earning $ 250,000 a year? (Thats kills jobs you Kenyan Idiot!)

Obama Pledge: I Will Raise Taxes on the Rich

Monday, 09 Jul 2012 12:59 PM

By Newsmax Wires

More ways to share...

President Barack Obama will veto any congressional legislation that extends Bush-era tax cuts to wealthier Americans, the White House made clear on Monday.

"He would not support it. He would not sign that bill," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters when asked whether Obama would veto any bill passed by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives that keeps tax cuts in place across-the-board for all income levels.

Carney spoke after Obama called for a one-year extension of the Bush-era cuts for families earning less than $250,000 a year, seeking to put Republicans on the defensive and reinforce his re-election campaign mantra of being a middle-class champion.

Obama wants to let tax cuts enacted by Republican President George W. Bush, his predecessor, expire on Jan. 1 for higher income earners.

During his speech, Obama — eager to shift election-year attention away from the nation's lackluster jobs market — called on Congress to extend tax cuts for only low and middle income earners while allowing taxes to increase for families that make more than a quarter-million a year.

"Let's not hold the vast majority of Americans and our economy hostage while we debate the merits of another tax cut for the wealthy," said Obama, flanked by a dozen people the White House said would benefit from the middle class-oriented tax cut extension.

Obama wants Congress to pass a one-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts for households making less than $250,000 before they expire at the end of the year. He said the outcome of his November election contest with Republican rival Mitt Romney would then determine the fate of the tax cuts for higher income earners.

"My opponent will fight to keep them in place. I will fight to end them," he said.

Obama has long supported expiration of the tax cuts for those making more than $250,000. But the White House and the president's re-election team are reviving his arguments now as a way to paint congressional Republicans as obstructionists and Romney as a protector of the wealthy, suggesting the GOP push for an across-the-board extension of the tax cuts puts the middle class at risk.

The president's announcement also follows Friday's dismal jobs report, which showed the nation's unemployment rate stubbornly stuck at 8.2 percent.

Romney supports extending the tax cuts for all income earners. His campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul said Monday that Obama's proposal amounted to a "massive tax increase" and proved that the president "doesn't have a clue how to get America working again and help the middle class."

The contours of the tax debate are largely the same as they were when the cuts were due to expire at the end of 2010. While Obama opposed an extension for higher income earners then as well, he ultimately agreed to full two-year extension, in part to win concessions for other legislation.

The president did not say whether he would veto legislation this year that again extended the whole range of tax cuts in full, leaving that to Carney to spell out.

Democrats see the tax debate as part of a larger coordinated attack on Romney, which includes intensifying calls for him to explain offshore bank accounts and release several years of tax returns.

The strategy is aimed at portraying Romney, whose personal wealth could exceed $250 million, as disconnected from middle-class voters.

Romney aides say the Democratic attacks on the presumptive GOP nominee's wealth an "unfounded character assault."

Romney hasn't shirked from his wealth in the face of renewed Democratic criticism. He held a $50,000 per person fundraisers Sunday in the Hamptons, New York's exclusive string of waterfront communities on Long Island's South Shore.

Romney aides also announced that the campaign and the Republican National Committee raised a combined $106 million in June, the former Massachusetts governor's biggest monthly haul so far. The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee raised $71 million last month.

Republican lawmakers immediately balked at Obama's call for a partial extension.

"No one should see an income tax hike next year — not families, not small businesses and other job creators," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

The president's pitch may also face some opposition from congressional Democrats. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Charles Schumer, of New York., a member of the Democrats' Senate leadership, have both advocated denying the tax cut extension to those making above $1 million annually.

Extending the tax cuts only for households making below $250,000 costs the government about $800 billion less over 10 years than extending them for everyone. The full cuts cost the government about $4.5 trillion over a decade.

Obama was to continue the tax debate Tuesday during a campaign trip to Iowa. His re-election team was also promoting the president's tax policy at a series of events this week in battleground states, including New Hampshire, Colorado and Nevada.

The Bush-era tax cuts are due to expire at the end of the year unless Congress votes to extend them. Economists worry that across-the-board tax increases, along with automatic spending cuts also scheduled to take hold at year's end, could be a blow to the shaky U.S. economy.

© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Obama Pledge: I Will Raise Taxes on the Rich
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

HEY OBAMA DON'T LIE... YOU KNOW... The Real Unemployment Rate Is Nearly 15%

The Real Unemployment Rate Is Nearly 15%

Would you be shocked to learn that the unemployment rate the mainstream media reports does not actually reflect the true unemployment rate in the U.S.?

The reported unemployment rate is 8.2%.

This is the percentage of people who are out of work but are still pounding the pavement looking for a job in the PAST 4 WEEKS !!.

That is different from the more important number, called the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR). This number represents all of the people in the entire workforce who could look for work if they tried. When people give up looking for work, they exit the workforce.

Have a look at this graph, courtesy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

As you can see, the LFPR climbed from the 1960s on as women entered the workforce. Now, there are various periods of recession. From 1956 to late 1962, the LFPR fell from 60.2% to as low as 58.4%. This included two recessionary periods. The period from 1990-1991 saw the rate drop from 66.8% to 66.0%.

Now here’s the really bad news: The LFPR is now at its lowest level since 1983, at 63.8%, just off its low of 63.6%. It has fallen by 1.9% points (down from 2.1%) — the largest drop under any president and the largest drop in any period since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started keeping track.

Thus, the real unemployment rate isn’t anywhere close to 8.2% because the reported number doesn’t account for all those folks who have given up and left the workforce. The real number?  Are you ready?  It’s 14.8%.

Oh. My. Gosh. Wait — is this right?  Yes. Here’s how the math works:

Let’s say you’re in a town with 100 people. That’s your labor force, and everyone is looking for work. Let’s say 70 of those people are working, and 30 are not. So you have a Labor Force Participation Rate of 100%, employment of 70%, and an unemployment rate of 30%.

Now, 10 people get frustrated and give up looking for work. So you have a Labor Force Participation Rate of 90% since 70 people are working, 20 are not and 10 have given up. That gives you 77% employment and only 23% unemployment!

What about those 10 dejected people who aren’t being counted? 

THEY RE REDUCING THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FOR OBAMA...
YES THAT'S RIGHT STOP LOOKING FOR A JOB AND YOU HELP OBAMA REDUCE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES AND THAT GET HIM RE ELECTED!!

WHAT A PLAN !!

For starters, since real unemployment was a lot worse, it explains some of the spending recovery. Now, however, the easy recovery is over. The question is, where do we go from here?

One problem, as I’ve pointed out, is that there’s a capital strike. I believe this will continue as long as President Obama remains in office. So if you think the election will go his way, then I’d not count on much recovery from here.

THE GOVERNMENT BLUFFS THE REAL U-# UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: Real U-3 Unemployment Rate: 11.6%

Real U-3 Unemployment Rate: 11.6%

Submitted by Tyler Durden
Propaganda unemployment rate: 8.1%; Real unemployment rate: 11.6%. Reason for difference: organic growth of labor force which grows alongside the broader population. Don't be confused by cheap explanations on TV why the labor force should be declining (especially with ZIRP meaning pre-retirement workers have to stay in the labor force ever longer to supplant their meager fixed income): the widely accepted definition of the labor pool, that used by the CBO and all other government forecasting agencies, assumes a 90,000 growth in the labor force every month as it has to keep in line with the growth of the US population! The implication is simple: using a real labor force participation rate long-term average of 65.8%, the real unemployment rate in April was 11.6%, based on the 5.4 million additional workers that should be counted as part of the U-3 which then means that the real number of unemployed is not 12.5 million but 17.9 million, which in turn implies a 11.6% unemployment rate in the US. This also means that the spread between the propaganda, and the real number is now 3.5%: the most it has been since the early 1980s.

Sick of the BLS propaganda?


Then do the following calculation with us: using BLS data, the US civilian non-institutional population was 242,269 in January, an increase of 1.7 million month over month: apply the long-term average labor force participation rate of 65.8% to this number (because as chart 2 below shows, people are not retiring as the popular propaganda goes: in fact labor participation in those aged 55 and over has been soaring as more and more old people have to work overtime, forget retiring), and you get 159.4 million: that is what the real labor force should be. The BLS reported one? 154.4 million: a tiny 5 million difference. Then add these people who the BLS is purposefully ignoring yet who most certainly are in dire need of labor and/or a job to the 12.758 million reported unemployed by the BLS and you get 17.776 million in real unemployed workers. What does this mean? That using just the BLS denominator in calculating the unemployed rate of 154.4 million, the real unemployment rate actually rose in January to 11.5%. Compare that with the BLS reported decline from 8.5% to 8.3%. It also means that the spread between the reported and implied unemployment rate just soared to a fresh 30 year high of 3.2%. And that is how with a calculator and just one minute of math, one strips away countless hours of BLS propaganda.
Difference between Reported and Implied Unemployment Rate

And why the Labor Force Participation rate is not declining due to retirement.

HEY OBAMA THE MORON.. ...85,000 Americans went on disability benefit in June (while only 80,000 jobs were added in same period)

85,000 Americans went on disability benefit in June (while only 80,000 jobs were added in same period)

WTF ????  And this a great job recovery track ???

On Top of all the Obama Cabal Taxes: ...U.N. Proposes Global Taxes to Fund ‘Global Challenges’ Such As Climate Change

U.N. Proposes Global Taxes to Fund ‘Global Challenges’ Such As Climate Change

By Patrick Goodenough

July 6, 2012

CNS NEWS:

Participants in an Occupy Dallas tax day protest demonstrate a Citigroup shareholders’ meeting in Dallas, Texas on Tuesday, April 17, 2012. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

(CNSNews.com) – Prompting warnings of a “global governance” push, the United Nations released a report Thursday proposing mechanisms including a global carbon tax, currency transaction tax and a “billionaire’s tax,” to finance development and global needs such as combating climate change.

The U.N. World Economic and Social Survey (WESS) says such taxes could raise more than $400 billion a year, at a time when donor countries are unwilling or unable – “in the midst of difficult financial times” – to maintain the levels of development aid necessary.

“Donor countries have fallen well short of their aid commitments and development assistance declined last year because of budget cuts, increasing the shortfall to $167 billion,” said survey author Rob Vos in a statement.

“Although donors must meet their commitments, it is time to look for other ways to find resources to finance development needs and address growing global challenges, such as combating climate change,” he said.

“We are suggesting various ways to tap resources through international mechanisms, such as coordinated taxes on carbon emissions, air traffic, and financial and currency transactions.”

The WESS is produced each year by the U.N.’s Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Voss is director of the department’s Development Policy and Analysis Division.

The proposed mechanisms in this year’s report, entitled “In Search of New Development Finance,” include:

-- Carbon Tax: A tax of $25 a ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted in developed countries would raise an estimated $25 billion a year. The money could be collected by national authorities, but be earmarked for international cooperation. CO2 is the “greenhouse gas” blamed most often for climate change.

Australia’s Labor government on Sunday launched a controversial carbon tax, charging 500 major companies $23 for every ton of CO2 emitted. The conservative opposition has vowed to scrap the measure if it returns to power at the next general election.

-- Currency Transaction Tax: A tax of 0.005 percent on all trading in four major currencies – the U.S. dollar, the euro, the yen and pound sterling – would yield around $40 billion a year for international initiatives. The decades-old idea of levying a small charge on financial transactions is sometimes called a “Robin Hood tax” since it supposedly taxes rich nations to benefit poor ones.

The European Union’s executive Commission has proposed the introduction of such a tax – 0.1 percent for shares and bonds and 0.01 percent for derivatives – in the 27-member union with effect from January 1, 2014, an initiative expected to raise just over $70 billion a year. The WESS says a portion of that could be earmarked for international cooperation.

-- SDRs: Allocation of International Monetary Fund Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) could yield $100 billion a year to purchase long-term assets that could then be used for development finance. Set up in the 1960s, SDRs are used by governments and some international institutions. It is not itself a currency, but its value is based on a basket of the dollar, euro, pound sterling and yen. Some countries, including Russia, China and Brazil, have been pushing the idea of SDRs replacing the greenback as the world’s reserve currency.

-- Billionaire’s Tax: A tax of around one percent on individual wealth holdings of $1 billion or more, “with the revenue destined to finance internationally agreed global development purposes.” The WESS says this mechanism, which it estimates could raise $50 billion a year, is an option that could be explored but needs further technical elaboration.

“Realizing the potential of these mechanisms will require international agreement and corresponding political will, both to tap sources as well as to ensure allocation of revenues for development,” said Vos.

‘Unaccountable’ taxing authority

Myron Ebell, director of energy and global warming policy at the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute, warned that the proposals were dangerous and should be opposed by “anyone who believes in our national sovereignty and opposes global governance.”

“The chief ambition of the United Nations for many years has been to increase funding for their vast bureaucracy by creating some sort of new global tax that flows automatically without any control by the U.N.’s member governments,” he said late Thursday.

“Such a taxing authority would thus be totally unaccountable to elected officials in the U. S. (or to officials in any other country for that matter),” Ebell said. “Money is power: hundreds of billions of dollars in additional annual revenue would allow the U.N. to create the institutions of global governance that are contained in several U.N. environmental treaties but that have never been realized due to lack of funding.

“For example, a global tax could be used by the U.N. to fund a global warming agency to enforce restrictions against countries using more than their ‘fair share’ of fossil energy,” Ebell said.

“If the United Nations tries to impose a global carbon tax or a tax on international currency transactions or any other tax that bypasses payments voted by the national legislatures of member countries, that is the day the United States should pull out of the U.N.,” said Phyllis Schlafly, president of the conservative Eagle Forum.

“It’s become clear that the real purpose of the U.N. is to steal the wealth of the United States and transfer it to anti-American dictators all over the world,” she added.

The WESS says climate change is an area where the potential for innovative financial mechanisms is especially high.

It points to the E.U. emission-trading (cap-and-trade) scheme – which controversially was expanded to cover aviation as of January 1 – as potentially generating $20-$35 billion annually in the coming years.

However, partly due to domestic financial pressures, most E.U. members have up to now been unwilling to commit revenue raised by the cap-and-trade system to international programs, the report says.

Germany is an exception, having committed to earmarking 15 percent of revenue raised to “international climate finance.” The WESS says if other E.U. members follow Germany’s lead, Europe’s cap-and-trade could raise $3-$5 billion a year for international purposes.

The report recognizes the political difficulties its proposals are likely to face.

“Politically, tapping revenue from global resources and raising taxes internationally to address global problems are much more difficult than taxing for purely domestic purposes,” it says.

“But like all political decisions taken for the next generation and not just for the next election, this should be assessed carefully against alternative scenarios, including the very dangerous one of continuing polarization, exclusion, confrontation and insecurity in the world.”

THE ILLEGAL PRESIDENT: How Obama steals elections one at a time

Defeating America from Within

It should be obvious that the best way to defeat America would be to do so from within. What if, the plan from the start was for Obama to defeat the U.S. by becoming it's chief executive? I know you don't want to believe it, but when you connect the dots it seems all the more plausible that this was a careful thought out plan right from the start.
In 1995 Barack Obama, then 35, ran for Alice Palmer's seat in the State Senate when Alice Palmer decided to run for the U.S. Congress. He was backed by his Syrian friend, Antoin (Tony) Rezko and Al Johnson, retired auto dealer who had been in the Mayor Harold Washington administration. When Palmer who had backed Obama to succeed her in the state Senate lost her election for the U.S. Congress, she asked Obama to step aside so she could return to her state Senate seat BUT Obama refused and challenged her re-qualification signatures on the ballot. Palmer was subsequently disqualified and Obama was able to run unopposed.
"[William] Ayers and Dohrn (domestic terrorists of Weather Underground fame) hosted a gathering at their home in the Hyde Park section of Chicago, the neighborhood in which the Obamas lived, at which then- state Senator Alice J. Palmer introduced Barack Obama as her choice for the 1996 Democratic primary. Palmer denied that she organized the political affair for Obama, although she said she attended. Dr. Quentin Young, a longtime physician, who also attended, referred to the gathering as the political coming-out party for Obama. Young said it was a small group-maybe a dozen or so people-who were being introduced to the next senator from Chicago's South Side, and that money was raised for Obama at the event. Although the exact date of the gathering is not known, it was sometime in the second half of 1995, according to Ben Smith, a reporter for The Politico." (See Ireport.com)
During the last days of the presidential election, have you noticed how William Ayers, one of Barack Obama's handlers and the ghost writer of his book[s] has vanished from public view?
"The co-founder of the Weathermen, the anti-Vietnam War group that bombed the Pentagon and US Capitol in the 1970s, has vanished as John McCain seeks to make his links to Barack Obama a central issue in the last weeks of the presidential campaign."
After Obama won the election with the Black vote and the too-young-to-know-better voting block, when it mattered, John McCain didn't fight back using the evidence he had; the sealed documents, the lies and the refusal of Barack Obama to disclose what America was entitled to know.
Most Americans were too disconnected in spite of the longest and most expensive campaign ever. When asked simple questions, most Obama supporters could not even tell you what Wade vs Roe was and many still don't know where Iraq is located or "redistribution" ("to each according to needs") isn't codified inthe Contitution.
"There was no one home when The Times visited Mr Ayers' house in a quiet street three blocks from Mr Obama's mansion in the Hyde Park district of Chicago. The Education Department of the University of Illinois, where Mr Ayers works, said that he had gone on sabbatical. In response to an e-mail he stated: `I'm not available right now. Perhaps in the future. Best, Bill.'..." ( Times Online)
Obama wasn't satisfied with a seat in the state Senate; his plan was to go all the way to the White House. Who doesn't wonder, even those not given to conspiracies, if Obama was planning something bigger even then? Of course he was. He and Rezko and Ayers and the long list of characters already mentioned here over the last two years
Here is how Cynthia Miller, manager of Obama's Senate district office describes Obama's ambition, as described by Dan Morain in the LA Times in September 2008,
"Cynthia K. Miller, who ran his district office, recalls an incident shortly after Obama's election. She had taken a longer-than-normal lunch break and returned to find an impatient state senator waiting for her...He didn't raise his voice, she said, but he turned stern as he explained the importance of time management and the need to focus on goals. Then he shared his own goal: `I plan to be president.'"
Obama was not a professor, as he is sometimes referred to by his friends; he was a part time lecturer, an obvious attempt to make him out to be what he is not. And look who his neighbors are.
"Obama's state Senate district was a mix of mansions, trendy town homes and tenements. It encompassed the leafy campus of the University of Chicago, where Obama worked part time as a law school lecturer before and after his election." (ibid)
"Talk-show host Oprah Winfrey, who is having a fund-raiser for Obama at her Montecito estate in Santa Barbara County today, keeps a residence in the old district. The Rev. Jesse Jackson, who has endorsed Obama, and Minister Louis Farrakhan, head of the black separatist Nation of Islam, live within three blocks of Obama's home." (ibid)
"He teamed with Republican state Sen. Kirk Dillard to revoke a law that allowed lawmakers to convert campaign money to personal use, for some legislators a source of substantial largesse." (ibid)

Things Happen Because
They are Made To Happen

When Obama was interviewed bu George Stephanopoulous on ON ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulous," Senator Barack Obama was asked why he went to Antoin Rezko for help buying his mansion and the lot adjacent to it, he responded with:
"Well, you know, I think that, you know, we had bought a house for the first time and, you know, we were trying to figure out how to set the whole thing up and, you know, this is somebody that I had known for some time. It was an aboveboard legal transaction. I paid more than the price of the property that I purchased and so the assumption was that this was all aboveboard."
How many first homes are in the million dollar range? And the fly in that ointment was it was not the first time. Obama did buy a previous home, a condo in Hyde Park before they purchased the $1.6 million mansion in Kenwood.
This was not the last and has not been the first time Obama couldn't get his facts straight. Like the fact that Obama's connection with Rezko was more complex than has been disclosed or investigated.
Nothing just happens. It happens because it is made to happen.
Obama went to work in Chicago in 1993 in a law firm where the major partner was Allison S. Davis of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Later Davis would leave the firm and invest in Rezko's "government-subsidized" business - which the law firm represented to obtain those contracts, which had been a major part of the law firm's legal work - the same company which Obama decided to join.
Tim Novak of the Chicago Sun-Times (April 23, 2007) wrote:
"Davis and Rezko also went into business together, building upscale homes in the booming Kenwood neighborhood where Davis lives. The legal work on those deals was also done by Davis' former law firm, where Obama was working." (Novak)
"While Davis was running the law firm, he was also a board member of the Woodlawn Preservation and Investment Corp., a not-for-profit company that hooked up with Rezko's Rezmar Corp. on tax-supported projects to rehabilitate apartments for low-income tenants. Davis' firm handled the legal work on those housing deals." (Novak)
"Davis has long been an influential member of the Woodlawn community just south of the University of Chicago. His father was the university's first African-American professor. Since 1991, Davis has been a member of the Chicago Plan Commission, appointed by Mayor Daley, a friend." (Novak)
"Four years ago, Blagojevich appointed Davis to the Illinois State Board of Investment, which controls state pension funds -- one of a series of appointments THE GOVERNOR MADE AT REZKO'S REQUEST."

Obama Stretches Credulity

"In 1991, after Obama became the first black president of the Harvard Law Review, Rezko offered him a job. While Obama declined, the two began a friendship that deepened as Obama launched his political career and Rezko became a key fund-raiser. The two men and their wives used to socialize, meeting for dinner, Obama has said. After earning his degree, Obama returned to Chicago, ran a voter registration drive, began work on an autobiography and in 1993 went to work in a small but influential law firm now known as (Davis) Miner, Barnhill & Galland." (Chicago Tribune)
[The New York Times reported the method of selection changed to insure minority representation. Therefore Obama became the first black law review editor. But there is no record he wrote anything while he was the editor of the Harvard Law Review.]
"The firm also did work in affordable housing and several which involved Rezko's Rezmar Corp. "...one of the law firm's founding partners, Allison Davis, developed personal financial ties to Rezko. Davis later left the firm to become a for-profit developer, sometimes in deals with Rezko..." (Tribune)
There has been a great deal of spin control over this relationship. You see it especially in Daily KOS, which seems to be the leading liberal blog source of pro-Obama propaganda. I have read other blogs where former KOS webloggers have divorced themselves form KOS because of it's unbalanced support for Obama.
"Responding to a Chicago Sun-Times report that Obama's former law firm did legal work for Rezko's low-income housing development business, the Illinois senator said he performed five hours of work on behalf of non-profit housing groups that partnered with Rezko. "We were brought in through them [the non-profits], not through Rezko," Obama said. (Times-Tribune)
BUT, not to forget the socializing and the acquisition of Obama's 1.6 million mansion with Rezko's generosity. One must ask, what was Rezko promised and what did Rezko get in return?
Obama has answered charges of political collusion and special favors by saying he was unaware of the scope of the problem with Rezko's deteriorating housing projects - even though many of them were IN HIS DISTRICT. He said he never heard a complaint from anyone.
"The Sun-Times reported that Rezko donated to Obama at the same time residents were without heat at one of the troubled properties operated by Rezko's firm, Rezmar Corp. The firm received taxpayer help to rehab 30 buildings, including 11 in Obama's state legislative district on the South Side." (Tribune)
The Tribune reported that, "When Obama first ran for the Illinois Senate in 1996, Rezko was among his first political donors. And when Obama ran for the U.S. Senate, Rezko was a major fundraiser." Some of this money, it seems, was funneled through Rezko and may have come from other Arab sources. Rezko is also a native born Syrian. It is as-if Obama and his handlers had planned to take over the government years ago and as slick as the plan was to fly airplanes in the World Towers, this plan would be even more astute and deftly planned. Is Obama a Muslim sleeper?
You have all heard some of the speeches. It is all FLUFF. Where is the beef? As I wrote here once before I've heard a lot of speeches when I worked in Washington at the White House and in the Pentagon - and I admit to having been moved by some of them and given a fair comparison I would have to say, I am not particularly inspired by Obama. I do keep asking, "Where is the beef?" Where are the specifics? And when there is, it lacks substance. Perhaps, it must be my generation, who is far more adroit and far more experienced with politicians, because most of the over 60 crowd will not be supporting Barack Obama. Most of us have heard the snake oil salesman before and Obama sure sounds like a cross between a snake oil salesman and a preacher.
As for Rezko's help acquiring the Obama $1.6 million dollar mansion, a really nice deal which makes a solid case for caring about the poor; doesn't it? As for Rezko, Obama says now, that was a mistake and the legal work really didn't amount to much. We know better than that. They had a long relationship, going back about 17 years and a lot of money flowed to Obama from Rezko.
It stretches credulity to expect anyone to believe it was an honest mistake - if not their intentional mission to infiltrate the political system and grab power from within.