Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Obama lied and Obama spied starting in 2011

EXPOSED: THE WORST OFFENSE OF A SECRETIVE THUG ADMINISTRATION. NOW ALL OF IT MAKES SENSE. BLACKMAIL!

First lets cut the crap and call it what it is. 

"Unmasking" in simple terms is "SPYING".

 


Why Justice Roberts switched his vote. Why Angela Merkel became the Pro Islamic germa leader she is. Why Pope Benedict suddenly retired. Why John Boehner sided with Obama and suddenly retired. Why Romney Ryan were always one step behind in the 2012 elections. Why the Republicans were always exposed and why Key Conservatives like John McCain and Lindsay Graham switched sides in the fight. They had all their dirty little secrets!

BLACK MAIL IS A POWERFUL TOOL USED BY SPYMASTERS AROUND THE GLOBE.

The National Security Agency under former President Barack Obama routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall, according to once top-secret documents that chronicle some of the most serious constitutional abuses to date by the U.S. intelligence community. 

More than 5 percent, or one out of every 20 searches seeking upstream Internet data on Americans inside the NSA’s so-called Section 702 database violated the safeguards Obama and his intelligence chiefs vowed to follow in 2011, according to one classified internal report reviewed by Circa.

The Obama administration self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door hearing Oct. 26 before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that set off alarm. Trump was elected less than two weeks later.

The normally supportive court censured administration officials, saying the failure to disclose the extent of the violations earlier amounted to an “institutional lack of candor” and that the improper searches constituted a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue,” according to a recently unsealed court document dated April 26, 2017.

The admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans.

Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy rules in 2011.

Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly monitored to avoid abuses.

The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true.
The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.


Yes ...

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years.

For what you have to ask yourself. Not because it could.. but because they had a plan. To STEAL AMERICA! No other answer will make sense! You can see the results.

The National Security Agency under former President Barack Obama routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall, according to once top-secret documents that chronicle some of the most serious constitutional abuses to date by the U.S. intelligence community.

More than 5 percent, or one out of every 20 searches seeking upstream Internet data on Americans inside the NSA’s so-called Section 702 database violated the safeguards Obama and his intelligence chiefs vowed to follow in 2011, according to one classified internal report reviewed by Circa.

The Obama administration self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door hearing Oct. 26 before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that set off alarm. Trump was elected less than two weeks later.
The normally supportive court censured administration officials, saying the failure to disclose the extent of the violations earlier amounted to an “institutional lack of candor” and that the improper searches constituted a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue,” according to a recently unsealed court document dated April 26, 2017.
The admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans.

Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy rules in 2011.
Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly monitored to avoid abuses.

The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true.

“Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702,” the unsealed court ruling declared. “The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries inviolation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

Speaking Wednesday on Fox News, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said there was an apparent effort under the Obama Administration to increase the number of unmaskings of Americans.

"If we determine this to be true, this is an enormous abuse of power," Paul said. “This will dwarf all other stories.”

“There are hundreds and hundreds of people,” Paul added.


The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.

“I think what this emphasizes is the shocking lack of oversight of these programs,” said Neema Singh Guliani, the ACLU’s legislative counsel in Washington. 
“You have these problems going on for years that only come to the attention of the court late in the game and then it takes additional years to change its practices.
“I think it does call into question all those defenses that we kept hearing, that we always have a robust oversight structure and we have culture of adherence to privacy standards,” she added. “And the headline now is they actually haven’t been in compliacne for years and the FISA court itself says in its opinion is that the NSA suffers from a culture of a lack of candor.”
The NSA acknowledged it self-disclosed the mass violations to the court last fall and that in April it took the extraordinary step of suspending the type of searches that were violating the rules, even deleting prior collected data on Americans to avoid any further violations.
“NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target,” the agency said in the statement that was dated April 28 and placed on its Web site without capturing much media or congressional attention.
In question is the collection of what is known as upstream “about data”about an American that is collected even though they were not directly in contact with a foreigner that the NSA was legally allowed to intercept.
The NSA said it doesn't have the ability to stop collecting ‘about’ information on Americans, “without losing some other important data. ” It, however, said it would stop the practice to “reduce the chance that it would acquire communication of U.S. persons or others who are not in direct contact with a foreign intelligence target.”
The NSA said it also plans to “delete the vast majority of its upstream internet data to further protect the privacy of U.S. person communications.”

Agency officials called the violations “inadvertent compliance lapses.” But the court and IG documents suggest the NSA had not developed a technological way to comply with the rules they had submitted to the court in 2011.

Officials "explained that NSA query compliance is largely maintained through a series of manual checks" and had not "included the proper limiters" to prevent unlawful searches, the NSA internal watchdog reported in a top secret report in January that was just declassified. A new system is being developed now, officials said.
The NSA conducts thousand of searches a year on data involving Americans and the actual numbers of violations were redacted from the documents Circa reviewed.
But a chart in the report showed there three types of violations, the most frequent being 5.2 percent of the time when NSA Section 702 upstream data on U.S. persons was searched.
The inspector general also found  noncompliance between 0.7 percent and 1.4 percent of the time involving NSA activities in which there was a court order to target an American for spying  but the rules were still not followed. Those activities are known as Section 704 and Section 705 spying.

NSaUpstreamComplianceChart.JPG
Review | The NSA inspector general's highly redacted chart showing privacy violations.

The IG report spared few words for the NSA’s efforts before the disclosure to ensure it was complying with practices, some that date to rules issued in 2008 in the final days of the Bush administration and others that Obama put into effect in 2011.

“We found that the Agency controls for monitoring query compliance have not been completely developed,” the inspector general reported, citing problems ranging from missing requirements for documentation to the failure to complete controls that would ensure “query compliance.”
The NSA’s Signal Intelligence Directorate, the nation’s main foreign surveillance arm, wrote a letter back to the IG saying it agreed with the findings and that “corrective action plans” are in the works.

NOW YOU KNOW...

DO NOT LET SOME FOOLISH TALKING HEADWAY YOUR UNDERSTANDING. WE ARE LIVING IN A POLICE STATE IF THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT PROSECUTE AND HANG THE PERPETRATORS!

Monday, August 7, 2017

Loretta Lynch As Attorney General used a Bogus email name JUST LIKE OBAMA!

JUST LIKE OBAMA AND SO MANY OTHERS IN THE LAST 8 YEARS OF CRIME AND FRAUD AND CHICANERY... and like her predecessor, Eric Holder, former Attorney General and like her Boss Barack Hussein Obama who all use FAKE emails to hide their crimes, Loretta Lynch used an email alias to conduct government business to cover her tracks on making sure Hillary Clinton was protected from Indictment from crimes tied to her own crookedness.


Call the Justice Department Phone 202 514 2000 Ext. 4 and tell them to Investigate NOW!.


Several of Lynch’s emails were included in 413 pages of DOJ documents provided to the conservative groups Judicial Watch and the American Center for Law and Justice. Both groups had filed lawsuits for records regarding Lynch’s controversial meeting with President Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport last June 27.
Using the pseudonym “Elizabeth Carlisle,” Lynch corresponded with DOJ press officials to hammer out talking points in response to media requests about the meeting. She wanted to be sure to cover her tracks and minimize the impact by working with lackeys in the press corp at the NY Times and the Washington post and alphabet Networks.

The tarmac was exposed by a lone reporter on the ground and  rightfully encountered criticism from conservatives because Lynch was overseeing the federal investigation into whether Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information on her private email system.

The meeting was revealed not by Lynch in her testimony, Clinton, the FBI under James Comey or the Justice Department but by a reporter in Phoenix working based on a tip.

On June 28, a reporter with Phoenix’s ABC News affiliate contacted the Justice Department to inquire about the meeting. Internal DOJ emails show that the request touched off a mad-dash to develop talking points and statements to respond to the developing story.
Just remember that Loretta Lynch is supposed to be the top Law enforcement Officer in the land.. and she is up to her eyeballs in CRIME to COVER UP Hillary's Crimes. Bought and Paid for based on Idelogy and Skin Color. Lynch, using the Elizabeth Carlisle account, which was hosted on the Justice Department’s system, was involved in directing those discussions.
Crooks cover their tracks in the hope they do not get caught. Eric Holder hiding information to protect Obama used the alias “Lew Alcindor” — the birth name of NBA legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar — as his email handle until he left DOJ in 2015.
The Carlisle emails were discovered over the weekend by followers of Reddit accounts that support President Trump. Some users developed the theory that Lynch used her grandmother’s name as a her pseudonym. Others concluded that Lynch broke the law by using a pseudonym, though it is not illegal for government officials to do so unless they do it in the interpreting or covering up of a CRIME.

In one email, sent just minutes after ABC News inquired about the tarmac meeting, Melanie Newman, the director of DOJ’s public affairs office at the time, wrote an email to the Elizabeth Carlisle account that she addressed to “AG Lynch.” 

This shows that the Alphabet Networks were partners in the crime since they already knew the Loretta Lynch secret email address.
Lynch responded later in the day to Newman and other DOJ officials.
“Thanks to all who worked on this,” reads the reply, which was ended with the initials “AG.”
Using the Carlisle account, Lynch was involved in several other email exchanges discussing drafts of talking points regarding her interaction with Clinton. We are certain that these were not the only times she used this email. She has used this email to direct payers of bribes and kickbacks to certain secret accounts in payment for her roles in the various schemes cooked up by the Clinton Gang. Nobody does illegal things for FREE!!
On June 29, Newman sent an email to the account — again with a greeting for “AG Lynch” — containing TV clips of news coverage of the airport encounter.
Lynch then went on to lie and downplay her meeting with Clinton, even though it had significant influence on the Clinton email probe. This is the Obstruction of Justice that the new Trump Justice Department must investigate!

The laws in this country were not written for the Citizen and excluded the Political connected and the Law Enforcers.
 

Lynch lied then that the former president boarded her airplane uninvited and spoke for about 30 minutes with her and her husband. She said that the conversation centered on grandchildren and other mundane issues like golf. Another lie.  She has insisted that the Hillary Clinton email investigation was not discussed. Another lie. Heads must roll for such abuses of power and lying!
Cornered Lynch reluctantly relinquished control over the email investigation after acknowledging that the meeting could be interpreted in a negative light. ( Yeah Right!!) Then she passed the baton onto another crook. He was instructed what was to be said and done to cover for Hillary.
FBI Director James Comey stepped in to oversee the investigation, which came to an end on July 5 when he gave a press conference announcing that charges would not be filed against Clinton. This was all part of the crooked dealings of the past administration.

Though Comey said that there was not enough evidence to prosecute the former secretary of state, he criticized her carelessness in using a private email account to send and receive classified information.

Other Obama administration officials have been caught using email aliases.
Tarmac Meeting
Another bombshell revealed in ACLJ’s release concerns several of the emails obtained address the secretive “tarmac” meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch, which happened right around the time the Obama administration began issuing FOIA requests to unmask the Trump team.
Per ACLJ:

One with the subject line “FLAG”was correspondence between FBI officials (Richard Quinn, FBI Media/Investigative Publicity, and Michael Kortan) and DOJ officials concerning “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official instructs the FBI to “let me know if you get any questions about this” and provides “[o]ur talkers [DOJ talking points] on this”. The talking points, however are redacted.

Another email to the FBI contains the subject line “security details coordinate between Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton?”

On July 1, 2016 – just days before our FOIA request – a DOJ email chain under the subject line, “FBI just called,” indicates that the “FBI . . . is looking for guidance” in responding to media inquiries about news reports that the FBI had prevented the press from taking pictures of the Clinton Lynch meeting. The discussion then went off email to several phone calls (of which we are not able to obtain records). An hour later, Carolyn Pokomy of the Office of the Attorney General stated, “I will let Rybicki know.” Jim Rybicki was the Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor to FBI Director Jim Comey. The information that was to be provided to Rybicki is redacted.
Lynch had previously said that the tarmac meeting was ‘unscheduled’ described as an ‘ambush’ by former President Bill Clinton, and that she ‘wouldn’t do it again.’ The ACLJ’s document dump suggests otherwise, as the FBI and DOJ scrambled to do damage control.

It has been exposed that crooks and Cohorts in the schemes tied to the Obama cabal all used phony names and aliases to cover their illegal acts.

AND THEN THERE IS THE PERJURY=> Loretta Lynch LIED UNDER OATH – She Told Trey Gowdy She Only Uses Official Email (Video) A Black Face Lie since we now expose the truth.
AG Loretta Lynch told Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) under oath that she only uses official email in November 2016 — after these above emails were sent.

Watch the video . and ask yourself. HOW DARE THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LOOK THE OTHER WAY?



 Former IRS official Lois Lerner, who targeted conservative non-profit groups seeking tax-exempt status, occasionally used the alias “Toby Miles” to send and receive work emails.
Lisa Jackson, the former administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, infamously used the alias “Richard Windsor” to conduct work business and yes Head Crook Barack Hussein Obama used a phony email ON THE CLINTON SERVER to conduct his extortion and kick back schemes while lying to the people through CBS 60 Minutes that he knew nothing about the Clinton Server until it was brought up in the press. YES. HE LIED... WHILE  HE WAS CONDUCTING HIS ILLEGAL MONEY SCHEMES. THIS IS THE LEVEL OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

So my question to you all is ..."If they are allowed to get away with it.. who do you blame?" 

My Answer.. " Blame us ALL"

If we do not demand justice in this society and get it.. we are no better off than Venezuela or Cuba. Only that our facade is prettier and more clean!

If the Trump Justice Department looks the other way and chase low hanging fruit like MS 13 and illegal aliens while the bigger crooks reside in their mansions comfortable in the knowledge that they will not be touched... THEN WE HAVE LOST THE REPUBLIC!

ACT NOW..  CALL THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND DEMAND INVESTIGATIONS AND SUBPOENA'S.

Not through Congress that is a TOOTHLESS TIGER with no power to Indict.. BUT THROUGH THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT!

Call the Justice Department Phone 202 514 2000 Ext. 4 and tell them to Investigate NOW!.

More Info on Loretta Lynch and Hillary Connections: http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2016/11/loretta-lynch-is-protecting-hillary.html


More info on Obama using fake email address

http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2016/10/obama-used-fake-name-on-clinton-server.html

Friday, August 4, 2017

How House & Senate Defrauded America to get out of Obamacare

How Congress ( 100 Senators and 540 Congressmen + their staff) Fraudulently claimed to be a ‘Small Business’ to Qualify for Obamacare Subsidies while the rest of us were screwed!



This scandal shows that the SWAMP has both Republicans and Democrats.Obama presided over this FRAUD as a bribe to get them to pass this FRAUD!

Read and SHARE how key administration and Congressional officials connived to create, under cover of Obamacare, special health insurance subsidies just for members of Congress. CROOKS & LIARS.

So now you know why they are in no hurry to REPEAL OBAMACARE. THEY HAVE A GOOD THING GOING!

DONALD TRUMP CAN STOP THIS FRAUD BY EXECUTIVE ORDER AND MAKE THEM FEEL THE PAIN TOO!

Here’s  the blow by blow in this scam

Rushing to enact the giant Obamacare bill in March 2010, Congress voted itself out of its own employer-sponsored health insurance coverage—the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP).
Section 1312(d)(3)(D) required members of Congress and staff to enroll in the new health insurance exchange system. But in pulling out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, they also cut themselves off from their employer-based insurance contributions.

(It should be noted that, before final passage, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, offered an amendment that would have provided Federal Employees Health Benefits Program subsidies for congressional enrollees in Obamacare, but Senate Democrats defeated it on a procedural vote, 56-43.)

Obamacare’s insurance subsidies for ordinary Americans are generous, but capped by income. No one with an annual income over $47,080 gets a subsidy. That’s well below typical Capitol Hill salaries. Members of Congress make $174,000 annually, and many on their staff have impressive, upper-middle-class paychecks.


So, let’s follow the thickening plot:
Act One—Congress Has a Panic Attack
Realizing what they had done, Congressional leaders sought desperately to get fatter taxpayer subsidies in the Obamacare exchange system. In a nutshell, they wanted special funding unavailable to other Americans. The standard excuse was that, without a special “sweetener,” a Capitol Hill “brain drain” would ensue; the best and brightest would flee to the private sector to get more affordable employment-based coverage.

From 2010 to 2013, House and Senate leaders schemed to get extra taxpayer subsidies—past “the Tea Party rabble”—without a lot of noise, and secure a nice, quiet “administrative” remedy from the Obama administration.

Their hopes centered on a compliant Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the agency that administers the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, providing the unauthorized relief. No recorded votes. No ugly floor fights.

Act Two—Congress Gets Taxpayers’ Money Without Appropriating It 

Anticipating an attempted “end run” around the law, on August 2, 2013, the Heritage Foundation published a detailed paper outlining the legislative history of the controversy. The analysis concluded that neither the Affordable Care Act nor Chapter 89 of Title V (the law governing the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program) authorized the transfer of monies in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program trust fund for use in health plans outside of the program.

Shortly thereafter, on August 13, 2013, Timothy Jost, professor of law at Washington and Lee University, wrote in his Health Affairs Blog:
“The exchanges are only open to individuals and small employers. No large employers can participate in the exchange, at least not yet. There is no provision, therefore for large employers, including the largest—the United States government—to pay for exchange coverage.
“Digging into the role of former House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,D-Nev., on Oct. 1, 2013, Politico reported, ‘OPM initially ruled that lawmakers and staffers couldn’t receive the subsidies once they went into the exchanges.’”

But, at a July 31 closed-door meeting with Senate Democrats, President Obama had promised he would “fix” the mess they made of their health coverage.

So, on August 7, 2013, just as Congress was getting out of town for the August recess, OPM ruled that members of Congress and staff enrolled in the exchange program would get Federal Employees Health Benefits Program subsidies, even though they were no longer in the program.

Act Three—Congress Magically Becomes a "Small Business" with under 50 employees.

In a second iteration of its rule-making, OPM declared that Congress and staff were eligible to enroll in the Washington D.C. “SHOP” Exchange, a health insurance exchange reserved for small businesses with fewer than 50 employees. The exchange offers special insurance subsidies to participating small businesses.

The problem was, of course, that Congress is not a “small business,” at least under any clinically sane definition of the term, and no section of the Affordable Care Act provided for any congressional exemption from the ban on large-employer participation in the SHOP exchanges. It’s hard to imagine a more arbitrary ruling.

Act Four—Congressional Bureaucrats File False Paperwork
In filing to get the special insurance subsidies for enrolling lawmakers and their staff members in the D.C. “SHOP” Exchange , congressional officials claimed that the Senate and House each had only 45 employees. That false information allowed both chambers to meet the magic number requirement.

In Feb. 2015, Sen. David Vitter, R-La., a member of the Senate’s Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee, attempted to subpoena these un-redacted documents, only to be stymied by all nine Committee Democrats and five Republicans.

According to National Review, Sen.Vitter’s effort was opposed by the Senate leadership. As for the five Committee Republicans, they alibied their votes with excuses that ranged from the merely lame to the transparently absurd.

Now the issue is simmering again. This month, Michael Cannon of the CATO Institute and John Malcolm, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, wrote in The Hill:
“Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show that unnamed officials who administer benefits for Congress made clearly false statements when they applied to have the House and Senate participate in D.C.’s ‘SHOP’ Exchange for 2014. Notably, they claimed the 435 member House had only 45 members and 45 staffers, while the 100-member Senate had only 45 employees total. Rather than a good faith clerical error, this was an intentional falsehood, which makes it a crime under both federal and D.C. law.”CROOKS! THEY ARE ALL CROOKS! 

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/d-c-government-concedes-law-not-allow-congress-obtain-obamacare-small-business-exchange/