Saturday, August 29, 2015


The Politically Correct Bullshit Of Facebook is out in full force.


I have been blocked and banned from facebook for my conservative views for 30 days at a time 15 times in 3 years.

Meanwhile the Progressives and Islamists spout their views against us day in and day out!

Facebook and its censorship department needs to be taught a lesson they will remember!

Patriots you know what to do !!


Sunday, August 23, 2015




China Declares Currency War on US Dollar Ahead of September Showdown
IMF’s Christine Lagarde gave a press conference in Washington DC making September 15th the deadline for the US to agree to give China more power within the International Monetary Fund.

Here, from Reuters:

“The IMFC, which is one of the key governing institutions of the IMF, has decided that if by the 15th of September this matter is not resolved satisfactorily, then we have to select the interim step that we will take … to make sure that there is an element of down payment on the quota increase…”

It’s not quite clear what Lagarde intends to do but the problem is a serious one. The US is obviously reluctant to cede too much control of the IMF to China and other developing countries. If Lagarde pushes too hard, she may significantly degrade relations between the US and China.

Not that they need further souring. Against US wishes, China has just devalued the yuan and the move “clobbered” markets around the world and especially in the US.

Reports were that when the damage was tallied after Tuesday’s trading, the MSCI All World Index of global shares had fallen 1 percent. US exports will no doubt suffer as well.

Bill McQuaker, co-head of the multi-asset team at Henderson Global Investors reportedly commented, “What is good for growth in China is unfortunately bad for everybody else.”

Of course it’s questionable whether a depreciated currency is ever “good.” In this topsy-turvy Keynesian world we live in, people have gotten the idea that when their currency is debased the economy will somehow improve.

This is only one fallacy that people hold. Another is that the US military-industrial complex is a necessary evil that is dedicated to providing a bulwark of national security to keep people safe. Nothing could be further from the truth. A military-industrial complex, as Dwight D. Eisenhower warned, is inevitably going to manufacture wars and military crises to stay in business and increase funding. Like it’s done for decades now.

China is going down this road, using its fiat-currency (the yuan) to fund a huge military binge. It is contesting certain waters in the South Pacific and has started building islands in the area. To protect the islands, China has increased its air-force presence and has also started to build more sophisticated planes and ships.

Chinese “aggression” has the US reportedly considering the use of its own naval and air power to confront the Chinese. John Kerry has traveled to China to personally make the US stance clear. Meanwhile, Chinese President Xi Jinping is due in Washington in September to discuss the military standoff.

It’s not clear if Kerry will discuss the festering IMF issue, but these three points of contention – as mentioned above – certainly constitute a trio of potentially disastrous sore spots.

There’s no doubt that the corrupt and dictatorial Chinese government is panicked by recent events. China’s stock market has lopped off over US$1 trillion in wealth in a dramatic and unexpected bear market.

The Chinese government has a kind of pact with its people. In return for providing prosperity, the Chinese people cede political power to the ruling party. And their hold on power is even more tenuous than in the US or Europe which means the Chinese government is liable to be a lot more desperate as a result.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see a good deal more tension – if not possible military action – in the fall, if the Chinese economic situation doesn’t improve. And there are plenty of things a desperate Chinese government can do to temporarily stabilize the Chinese situation that will have a destabilizing effect on the world economy.

China, for instance, could further debase the yuan, crushing the feeble “recovery” that US and European officials currently insist is taking place in the West. Alternatively China could begin dumping its trillion dollar reserve of US currency – and maybe it already has begun. There are reports to that effect.

Such dumping could set US price inflation soaring, forcing the Fed’s hand on a significant rate hike and plunge the US into a Greater Depression.

But avoid the worst case and one still faces significant difficulties. The combination of currency debasement, currency dumping and increased military tensions could heat up in the fall considerably.

What really is catching our attention is on how these events all seem to be coming to a head in September. Even Christine Lagarde has mentioned the exact date of September 15 of this year as a deadline… this is the exact date that we have mentioned in our viral video, “SHEMITAH EXPOSED: Financial Crisis Planned For September” as being the possible beginning date of a crisis. And then to have the Chinese President also coming to the US in September has us wondering if the crisis we are expecting will be China/Yuan/SDR related.

The Chinese have a saying, “may you live in interesting times” – and September looks increasingly interesting on a number of fronts.


Wednesday, August 19, 2015

An Illegal alien has a child on American soil, the Constitution does not require the child be granted American citizenship.

Are children of illegal aliens born on American soil U.S. citizens? The Constitution says no. 

Here is the actual language of the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” 

Birthright citizenship only belongs to those who were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States the moment they were born. But children of illegal aliens are not. 

Their parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States but rather of their home country, which is why they can be immediately deported if identified and apprehended. You can’t do that to an American citizen. 

Since the parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, neither are their children. They are, in plain fact, not citizens of the U.S. by birth. 

This is why the children of diplomats who are born on U.S. soil are not U.S. citizens. Since their parents are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, neither are the children. 

We are all familiar with the concept of “diplomatic immunity,” which diplomats often use to get themselves and their children out of trouble on American soil by claiming that the children are not under the authority of American law. All the American government can do in such circumstances is send them back to their home country. That is, all they can do is deport them. 

If an illegal alien has a child on American soil, the Constitution does not require the child be granted American citizenship. 

Congress can give citizenship to anyone it wants, but the Fourteenth Amendment only commands citizenship to persons born on U.S. soil to parents who are not citizens of a foreign country... 

While many erroneously claim that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born on American soil, the reality is that is not the law and has never been the law. Current immigration law–found at 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)–specifies that a baby born on American soil to (1) a foreign ambassador, (2) head of state, or (3) foreign military prisoner is not an American citizen. 

But if the view promoted by the Left that citizenship is automatic (and parroted by many in the middle and even on the Right who have not seriously studied the issue) is correct, then those three exceptions would be unconstitutional. The debate over birthright citizenship turns on what the Citizenship Clause means by the words “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” 

Every provision of the Constitution has a fixed meaning. Because only “We the People” can adopt a constitutional provision–all 27 amendments in the Constitution were proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, then ratified by three-fourths of the states–the only legitimate way to interpret the Constitution is in accordance with the original meaning of those terms. 

So the question becomes: What was the meaning of the Jurisdiction Clause in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified? One of the best tools for determining that is looking at the Civil Rights Act of 1866, enacted the same year that the Fourteenth Amendment was written by Congress... 

The Civil Rights Act included a provision to define American citizenship to secure it for former slaves. It read, “All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States...”

[T]he Civil Rights Act’s parallel language, “and not subject to any foreign power,” instead shows the Jurisdiction Clause excludes all citizens of any foreign country. The Citizenship Clause was intended to overrule the most infamous Supreme Court case in American history–the 1857 Dred Scott case–and ensure free blacks born in America could not be denied citizenship. It was never designed to make a citizen of every child born to a foreigner. 

The way forward is simple. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives power to Congress to “enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” 
Donald Trump in 2016 will work with a conservative Congress, which has the sole authority under the Constitution to determine immigration policy, to enact a law specifying in no uncertain terms that children of illegal aliens born on American soil are not American citizens. 

Some well-meaning Republican candidates are calling for an amendment to the Constitution to ban birthright citizenship. But in truth the Constitution does NOT need to be amended. It only needs to be applied.

Bottom line: Are children of illegal aliens American citizens? No. Why? Because the Constitution says they aren’t.


Friday, August 7, 2015

George Sorros will Crown Hillary Clinton the Next President of AMERIKA. Mark my words.

America is being destroyed from Within:

George Sorros will Select Hillary Clinton as the next President of the DISUNITED STATES OF AMERIKA.


Some might think this premature but unless Americans start reacting to the dangers of collectivism consuming our Republic, it is inevitable and it will be soon. We are racing to that finish line in no small part thanks to George Soros, his money and his connections. Soros is a Socialist who believes in a new world order. He sees the U.S. Republic as standing in the way of his globalist vision.

The United States is a lot less free than it was decades ago, even five years ago, and a globalist victory must of necessity end our sovereignty, our Bill of Rights and Constitution. They can’t co-exist in a collectivist society.
Putting an end to the Republic is the Soros goal. He is the cat and we are the mouse.
“I realized [as a young man] that it’s money that makes the world go round,” says Soros, “so I might as well make money.… But having made it, I could then indulge my social concerns.” Invariably, those concerns center around a desire to change the world generally—and America particularly—into something new, something consistent with his vision of “social justice.”
Soros’ social justice vision is identical to Karl Marx’ social justice except Soros believes in a small elite and privileged society of which he would be a member.
Soros founded The Open Society. The term “open society” was originally coined in 1932 by the French philosopher Henri Louis Bergson, to describe societies whose moral codes were founded upon “universal” principles seeking to enhance the welfare of all mankind—as opposed to “closed” societies that placed self-interest above any concern for other nations and cultures.
He does not believe in sovereignty or in absolutes such as God. He believes in all things being relative and morals that can shift according to the common good as defined by the collective.
Soros-funded initiatives aim at voting; open borders; forcing through progressive candidates and legislation’ disarming the US; abolishing the Second Amendment; corrupting Christianity; particularly the Catholic Church; forcing leftist values into the judicial system; universal health care; organizations that force leftist ideals into music, art, and all media; radical environmentalism; drug legalization; global government; radical feminism; euthanasia; and anti-Israel agreements with Palestine. I won’t go into all of them here. A few is quite enough.
Soros has a radical anti-gun agenda. He has teamed up with Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the Bloomberg initiative, which was recently outed as an organization whose goal is to confiscate guns. Over 50 mayors have quit because of it, according to Townhall.
According to Ammoland, the Soros organization, the National League of Cities, is actively pushing extreme anti-gun measures:
• Registration of all handguns
• Banning semi-automatic firearms
• Cracking down on gun shows
• A thirty-day waiting period on all gun purchases
• Ending the manufacture of magazines holding more than 10-rounds
• Turning parks, libraries and other public places into so-called “gun free” zones.
These measures would only be the beginning. Confiscation is Soros’ end goal. The National League of Cities is made up of 49 affiliated state Municipal Leagues, who are ACTIVELY working in state legislatures and city councils nationwide.
Anyone who has looked into the UN Small Arms Treaty knows confiscation is the goal of the left.
Soros is a philanthropist who has used his charities to inculcate recipients of his largesse with indoctrination. Take the Catholics and other religious groups.
They are an easy mark because they believe in social justice. However, social justice in religion and in politics are not necessarily the same. He funds the Sojourners which makes wealth redistribution into a biblical mandate. There is the Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good which brands individualism and capitalism as evil. Catholics for Choice is pushing for full abortion rights. If Soros can defeat pro-lifers, he can completely corrupt the church and its 100 million followers in the U.S.
Soros also funds organizations like the  Progressive States Network which aggressively seeks to pass Progressive legislation in the States; and his Progressive Change Committee which campaigns for the most Progressive candidates. Indeed, the leftists have most of the cities under their control.
George Soros, the socialist billionaire who helps fund the Center for American Progress, has the ear of the president on every issue.
Soros has a dream for the world and in order to make it work, he must defeat the Republic and turn the United States into a democracy, which is a euphemism for socialism. His Open Society is a social justice, economic justice, environmental justice, pro-abortion, pro-population control, UN-friendly, Marxist society.
The Center of American Progress’s president, John Podesta, is now working with the Administration at the White House to push through Obama’s decidedly leftist agenda by circumventing Congress.
The Center for American Progress, an arm of George Soros, laid out the blueprint for the use of executive orders, rule making, agencies et al, to circumvent Congress in the organization’s definitive report, “The Power of the President, Recommendations to Advance Progressive Change.”
To quote Mr. Podesta, ‘The ability of President Obama to accomplish important change through these powers should not be underestimated.’
Using obfuscating language, the essay encourages the President to use the powers they think he has to ignore Congress and the confines of the Constitution. It outlines a plan for an extremely powerful Executive Branch.
They advise the President to use his “constitutional powers:”
  • Executive orders
  • Rulemaking
  • Agency management
  • Convening and creating public-private partnerships [crony socialism]
  • Commanding the armed forces [sequestration?]
  • Diplomacy [lying?]
On the issue of open borders, which is what amnesty condones, almost all the groups opposing any restrictions on immigration reform are funded by Soros. This past week several groups promised to “punish” Republicans who do not support immigration reform with a path to citizenship now. The groups such as the  The Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM), America’s Voice, and Center for Community Change are all Soros-funded groups.
We can’t allow a shadow culture to continue in our society and something must be done but Soros hopes to make ill use of the opportunity.
The immigration fight has successfully been turned into racism against Hispanics when in fact, forty percent of the people sneaking into the U.S. are from countries other than Mexico, Central and South America. The propaganda has worked and it is why Soros funds untold numbers of far-left groups.
His Migration Policy Institute seeks to create “a North America with gradually disappearing border controls … with permanent migration remaining at moderate levels.”
The issue for Soros isn’t just about helping illegal immigrants, it’s about erasing our borders and our sovereignty. It’s about legalizing tens of millions of Democrats because people from statist nations vote for statists which is what the Democratic Party is becoming with little pushback from moderates.
If you really have doubts, look at the symbols they use. Here is one in which they use the communist fist:
Catalist Seeks is a Soros organization building a Progressive voter database. Mr. Obama is using Obama for America in the same way.
The Brennan Center for Justice which is Soros-funded, aims to restore voting rights to felons immediately following conviction because felons overwhelmingly vote for Democrats according to polls. Everyone is falling in line and buying into the idea that it will be part of their rehabilitation. This is in no small part due to the media.
When the Brennan Center for Justice, part of NYU’s Law School, came out against voting law changes, including voter ID as racist and anti-poor, based on a study before the 2012 election, The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and CBS News failed to note that the study was funded by George Soros. They do make a point of the Koch Brothers funding Libertarian or Conservative causes.
The price tag for the study came to over $10 million, according to Newsbusters.
As reported by Discover the Networks, Soros has a strong hand in the media.
The Media Research Center, in 2011, found that he spent $48 million in funds for: NBC, ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Columbia Journalism Review, ProPublica, the Center for Public Integrity, the Center for Investigative Reporting, The Lens, the Columbia School of Journalism, the National Federation of Community Broadcasters, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists, the Organization of News Ombudsmen, National Public Radio, the Pacifica Foundation, The American Prospect Inc. (the owner and publisher of The American Prospect magazine), the Nation Institute, the Media Fund, the Independent Media Center, the Independent Media Institute, Media Matters For America, and Free Press.
He funds “nonpartisan” watchdog organizations such as the Kansas City Chapter of The League of Women Voters.
Soros’ Open Society Institute and the Tides Foundation fund hundreds of groups devoted to pushing America to the left, including extreme environmentalists and avowed communists.
Soros has cultivated black communities and sold his Marxist philosophy to them. Some Soros groups have focused their efforts on spreading the belief that white racism is undiminished and intractable.
He funds the NAACP which should be renamed the NAAFLCP, the National Association for the Advancement of Far-Left Colored People.
When Lt. Col. Allen West said 80 House Democrats “are members of the Communist Party, it’s called the Congressional Progressive Caucus”, the NAACP ousted him. If he had said the Tea Party was racist they would have given him an award.
West’s statement was correct but he wasn’t armed with the proof at the time.
Soros’ Legal Defense and Education Fund provides legal and educational services for the NAACP. The NAACP supports racial preferences in employment and education, as well as the racial gerrymandering of voting districts. Underpinning its support for race preferences is the fervent belief that white racism in the United States remains an intractable, largely undiminished, phenomenon.
Soros funds organizations that help corrupt the vote.
He recently gave $1 million to the NAACP to fight voter ID laws. The NAACP recently held a march and, ironically, no one could join without a photo ID.
voter ID req
In 2012 Soros gave the Advancement Project, an organization funded by the convicted felon George Soros, sued Wisconsin over the new state Voter ID law. This is something he has done repeatedly.
Project Vote is funded by him and it is the voter mobilization arm of the infamous ACORN, and, yes, ACORN does still exist.
Project Vote, another Soros group, is the voter-mobilization arm of the Soros-funded ACORN. A persistent pattern of lawlessness and corruption has followed ACORN/Project Vote activities over the years. While the IRS is targeting Catherine Englebrecht of True the Vote, an organization that tries to keep the vote honest, Project Vote operates freely in the shadows of numerous minority communities.
George Soros is funding his son Jonathan’s efforts to destroy the Electoral College with an initiative that would bypass Congress called the National Popular Vote (NPV) or the National Popular Vote Compact (NPVC). They are close to having the number of states needed to pass it. It would ensure a permanent Democratic President and Vice President and it would enshrine voter corruption.
It is very complex. The article on this link helps explain the NPV. The corrupt scheme will give the power of the election to as few as 11 states in some instances. The big cities, which are liberal, will decide the election. When the Framers devised the college, it was for the express purpose of giving less-populated states a say in the presidential election. NPVC would destroy that.
It has bipartisan support in what can only be described as foolish or betrayal. Check out this interview on the subject.
Soros shows up everywhere, at CPAC, the Conservative Union PAC, as a funder of an anti-Israel Evangelical group, and even as a supporter of the 9/11 Truthers which he uses to push for his type of election reform.
When you see extremism and moral corruption in our society, look for George Soros and do consider this, the Republic cannot survive alongside a collective state as he has envisioned.

Sunday, August 2, 2015


The REAL Obama: Is he an An INDONESIAN, Muslim, Socialist Puppet The National Patriot ^By Craig Andresen


Over the last several days, conservatives across social media have been circulating an image, a split screen cut and paste of Obama and Mohammed (Pak) Subud along with a link to a very well thought out piece from Jason Kissner at American Thinker.
That piece brings several…”Coincidences” to light.
When it comes to politics and Obama’s past, there are no such things as “coincidences.”
Kissner shows links between Obama’s “mother” Stanley Ann Dunham to a certain Subud spiritual cult and also documents the verifiable link between the Subud cult and one Loretta Fuddy.
Fuddy, you will remember, was the woman who had been appointed in January, 2011, to head the agency in Hawaii that “verified” Obama’s birth certificate…The one he finally, after years of questions, displayed to the world in March of 2011.
Fuddy also was the lone non-survivor of a small plane crash off the coast of Hawaii just a couple of months ago.
No coincidences…Remember?
The idea being promoted is that this Mohammad Subud, the founder of the Subud cult, is Obama’s real father but, before we get to that, there IS something regarding that split-screen image you should know.
It is a composite.
According to Adrien Nash who wrote an article yesterday, “I copied and reversed Subud’s eye and replaced Obama’s which was squinting.”
A composite/split-screen that makes the 2 look more like each other than they otherwise might is not only the wrong way to highlight the visual similarities but, it is completely unnecessary.
The speculation is and, let’s remember, when it comes to Obama’s past we MUST speculate as his official past has been completely buried, that this Subud fathered the man we know as Barack Hussein Obama.
For the speculation to be true, one must assume that in 1960, Subud and Stanley Ann Dunham met, somewhere, and he, got her, pregnant thus leading to a child who would, after several name changes…Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Obama, Steven Dunham , Barry Soetoro and the name first noticed back in 2011 regarding an application for a passport extension filed by Stanley Ann Soetoro in 1968.
THAT name was found in the section for either including or exempting a child’s name from the passport and the name she placed THERE before crossing it out was, Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah)
Soebarkah, is has been suggested, is a combination name Soe (from Soetoro, Obama’s “adoptive” father) Bar (from the Islamic Aramic meaning, SON) and Kah (which roughly translates from Indonesian as “was” or, in some cases, in names is used to denote a QUESTION regarding “WHO?”)
It has also been suggested “Soebarkah” was a name provided by the Subud cult as Loretta Fuddy went by the Subud name of “Deliana” Fuddy.
Either way, it does nothing to either verify or debunk Pak Subud as being Obama’s real father.
What I am about to propose is speculation and, at first glance, seems pretty far out there but, upon consideration, may well be plausible.
There is a theory that Dunham traveled to Kenya in 1961 and it has been said that the reason for that trip was to give birth to her child and leave that child with the Obama family.
Then there is the theory that Dunham gave birth in Hawaii.
Which is true? Simply, there is no verifiable evidence for either theory but…The Kenyan birth would answer those swirling questions regarding those IN Kenya, including his grandmother, who claim to have been there FOR the birth and the claims of Kenyan officials who say that Obama was born in Kenya.
Those in the Dunham family who wanted an AMERICAN son could have simply written the announcement that appeared in the Hawaiian newspaper as there was never any verification or proof of birth needed to run such an announcement whether or not he was born THERE and simply returned FROM Kenya with Dunham-Obama.
Could she have returned to Hawaii with the son because the Kenyan Obama clan refused to take him?
In 1965 or so…Stanley Ann Dunham then traveled to Indonesia…With her son, where she was hired to start an English language, business communications department and, where SHE recruited and hired several teachers who were MEMBERS OF SUBUD.
No Coincidences…Remember?
Consider this scenario…
At some point before traveling to Indonesia, she met and was impregnated BY…Subud…NOT by Obama Sr. which would explain why Obama Sr. was never a part of Obama JR.’s life.
Could Subud had fathered a child (Soebarkah) by someone other than his wife?
Subud, before his “spiritual epiphany” was a Muslim and we are all aware of the monogamous fidelity of that ideology not to mention the dubious history of such strength of character in cult leaders…Especially in those who feel kinship with the Almighty.
What to do?
Since the teenage Dunham was sexually promiscuous anyway…Simply claim the child wasn’t HIS and she would then assume it belonged to someone ELSE…In this case…Obama Sr.
However, several years later, Dunham-Obama would have had to notice that her son looked nothing like the man she THOUGHT was the father and, the OTHER man she knew she had been with at the same time was…Subud…Living in Indonesia.
Is there any better explanation for why this young woman, with no ties to that country, would go to live there?
That would also explain how Barack Hussein Obama, adopted IN Indonesia by the INDONESIAN LOLO SOETORO, was able to attend school IN Indonesia as his records indicated, with Indonesian citizenship.
He was Indonesian all along.
It would also account for the attempted name inclusion on the passport extension application with Soebarkah, in parentheses, then crossed out.
Such a theory, speculative, as we must speculate where no verifiable evidence is available, also would go a long ways toward covering the whole fraudulent birth certificate issue as a child, born in Kenya, would not HAVE a Hawaiian birth certificate and who better to “authenticate” the forged certificate that Loretta…”DELIANA” Fuddy…A woman who WAS the CHAIRWOMAN OF SUBUD USA FROM 2006 UNTIL 2008 IN SEATTLE???
A woman who may…MAY…Have known the TRUTH regarding the “son” of Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro.
Well…That is exactly what those who took Obama from a Community Organizer to the white house clearly wouldn’t want known.
Isn’t it?
By spending millions of dollars, a mere pittance to the people who buried his past, they found a man who held no underlying allegiance to the United States and a man whose ideology was the same as their own.
In order to “fundamentally transform” the United States…They needed a SOCIALIST…NOT an AMERICAN who would become their willing puppet, doing what he was told, reading from their teleprompter text, a Muslim who would befriend our enemies while turning his back on our allies.
And Obama himself must have known all along as all the records pertaining to his past would not have been buried without his knowledge.
Who paid for his pricey Ivy League education? Saudis with no connection to him or the wealthy Indonesian leader of a spiritual movement who DIDN’T want to be connected to him, as hush payments?
Obama has never been conflicted because he was half WHITE…He, as a young man, was conflicted because he WASN’T half BLACK as, being BLACK in America during those college years would clearly have afforded Obama some entitlements.
And while, in this day and age, it can never be said for certain that pictures don’t lie but…They have and always will say 1000 words.
Now you tell me…Who is more likely to be the father of the current occupant of the oval office…

Barack Obama SR?
Mohammed (Pak) Subud???
Hey…Barack Hussein Obama…Barack Obama…Barry Obama…Steven Dunham…Barry Soetoro…Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah)…